Networked Forces in Stability Operations 101st Airborne Division 3 2 and 1 25 Stryker Brigades in Northern Iraq 1st Edition Daniel Gonzales Download
Networked Forces in Stability Operations 101st Airborne Division 3 2 and 1 25 Stryker Brigades in Northern Iraq 1st Edition Daniel Gonzales Download
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-italian-folgore-parachute-
division-operations-in-north-africa-1940-43-paolo-morisi/
https://ebookultra.com/download/special-operations-patrol-vehicles-
afghanistan-and-iraq-1st-edition-leigh-neville/
https://ebookultra.com/download/modern-trends-in-structural-and-solid-
mechanics-1-statics-and-stability-1st-edition-noel-challamel/
Acupuncture 1 2 3 Richard Teh-Fu Tan
https://ebookultra.com/download/acupuncture-1-2-3-richard-teh-fu-tan/
https://ebookultra.com/download/renewable-energy-
volumes-1-2-and-3-r-a-dunlap/
https://ebookultra.com/download/1-2-3-skein-crochet-first-edition-
annies-attic/
https://ebookultra.com/download/uncovering-student-ideas-in-science-
volume-3-another-25-formative-assessment-probes-page-keeley/
https://ebookultra.com/download/fiasco-the-american-military-
adventure-in-iraq-first-edition-1-in-number-line-edition-thomas-e-
ricks/
Networked Forces in Stability Operations 101st Airborne
Division 3 2 and 1 25 Stryker Brigades in Northern Iraq
1st Edition Daniel Gonzales Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Daniel Gonzales
ISBN(s): 9780833044273, 0833044273
Edition: 1
File Details: PDF, 2.24 MB
Year: 2007
Language: english
Networked Forces in
Stability Operations
101st Airborne Division,
3/2 and 1/25 Stryker Brigades
in Northern Iraq
                 Networked forces in stability operations : 101st Airborne Division, 3/2 and 1/25 Stryker
                   brigades in northern Iraq / Daniel Gonzales ... [et al.].
                        p. cm.
                      Includes bibliographical references.
                      ISBN 978-0-8330-4303-0 (pbk. : alk. paper)
                      1. Command and control systems—United States—Evaluation—Case studies.
                   2. Communications, Military—Evaluation—Case studies. 3. Stryker brigade
                   combat teams—Evaluation—Case studies. 4. United States. Army. Airborne
                   Division, 101st—History—21st century. 5. United States—Armed Forces—Stability
                   operations—Evaluation. 6. Iraq War, 2003–—Campaigns. I. Gonzales, Daniel,
                   1956–
                   UA943.N48 2007
                   956.7044'342—dc22
                                                                                             2007041879
Public release of this report was granted by the Chief of the DoD Office of Security Review
on 17 September 2007, per DD Form 1910.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and
effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world.
RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.
                                        R® is a registered trademark.
This case study report examines the network-centric operations (NCO) capabilities
and the operations of Stryker brigades and the 101st Airborne Division that conducted
stability operations in Iraq in the 2003 to 2005 time frame. We investigate how the
NCO capabilities and other resources available to these units were utilized to conduct
stability and counterinsurgency operations and whether these capabilities resulted in
improved mission effectiveness.
      The monograph should interest U.S. Army and joint task force designers, those
concerned with the development of digital battle command and communications sys-
tems, and those interested in the implications of NCO for the transformation of mili-
tary forces.
      This research was sponsored by the Office of Force Transformation and con-
ducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National
Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center spon-
sored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the unified combatant
commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and
the defense Intelligence Community.
      For more information on RAND’s Acquisition and Technology Policy
Center, contact the director, Philip Antón. He can be reached by email, Philip_Anton@
rand.org; by phone at 310-393-0411, ext. 7798; or by mail at RAND, 1776 Main Street,
Santa Monica, California, 90407-2138. More information about RAND is available at
www.rand.org.
                                          iii
Contents
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii
Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxxv
Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xxxvii
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Analytic Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Sources of Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Organization of Monograph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
CHAPTER TWO
Iraqi Operational Setting and Unit Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Characteristics of Anti-Iraqi Forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Phases of the Insurgency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Unit Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Areas of Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
AO Sizes, Personnel, Funding, and Attached Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Timeline of Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
U.S. Casualties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
                                                                                                     v
vi     Networked Forces in Stability Operations: 101st ABD, 3/2 and 1/25 SBCTs in Northern Iraq
CHAPTER THREE
Force Networking, Quality of Information, and Quality of Shared Situation
    Awareness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Networking Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Effect of Networking Systems on Quality of Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Specific Effects of Networking Systems on Quality of Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Effect of Networking Systems on Quality of Collaboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Quality of Shared Situation Awareness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
CHAPTER FOUR
Tactical Stability Missions, NCO-Enabled Processes, and Tactical Mission
    Effectiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
Tactical Military Operations in Stability Operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
NCO-Enabled Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Speed and Agility of Command. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Responsive Maneuver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Networking with Aerial Support and Surveillance Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
Robustness to Enemy Attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Stability Operations Intelligence Needs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
CHAPTER FIVE
Mission Effectiveness in Stability Operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
U.S. Strategic Objectives and MNF–I Campaign Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Assessment Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Assessment of Effectiveness—Political Progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Assessment of Effectiveness—Defeating Terrorists and Containing the Insurgency . . . . . . . 108
Summary of Mission Effectiveness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
CHAPTER SIX
Summary: Findings and Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                129
Assessment of 101st ABD Mission Effectiveness in Stability Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                            129
Assessment of 3/2 SBCT Mission Effectiveness in Stability Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                           133
Assessment of 1/25 SBCT Mission Effectiveness in Stability Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                            136
Role of NCO Capabilities in Improving Force Effectiveness in Stability Operations . . . . .                                                                                              139
Summary of Network and Intelligence Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                142
                                                                                                                                                                         Contents vii
APPENDIX
A. Director, Office of Force Transformation, Study Authorization Memorandum . . .                                                                                                         147
B. SBCT Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures Used in OIF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                     151
C. Detailed Results of the Quality of Information and Collaboration Surveys . . . . . . .                                                                                               161
D. Iraqi National Elections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                 165
Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
Figures
                                                                                      ix
x   Networked Forces in Stability Operations: 101st ABD, 3/2 and 1/25 SBCTs in Northern Iraq
                                                                         xi
Summary
Background
The Stryker brigade, one of the Army’s newest units, has advanced command, con-
trol, and intelligence capabilities and uses a network-centric concept of operations.
These capabilities include the full complement of Army digital communications and
battle command systems. Its networked capabilities enabled it to employ network-cen-
tric operations (NCO) capabilities down to a lower echelon than other Army units.
An important issue for the Department of Defense and the Army is whether these
improved capabilities translate into an information advantage and, if so, whether that
advantage results in greater mission effectiveness in stability operations.
This study attempts to answer those two questions by focusing on the Stryker brigade’s
performance in stability operations. It employs the case-study methodology to examine
three units that operated in the same area in Iraq between 2003 and 2005: the 101st
Airborne Division (ABD), the 3/2 Stryker brigade combat team (SBCT), and the 1/25
SBCT. All served in Iraq’s northern provinces. The study compares the performance
of the units along a number of dimensions. The comparisons between the 101st ABD
and the Stryker brigades are especially important because, although the 101st ABD
had some advanced battle command systems, it was largely an “analog” unit, i.e., one
that communicated using analog radios and generally used voice-only, line-of-sight
communications at the tactical level. In many respects, the units of the 101st ABD
closely resemble light infantry brigades. In contrast to the 101st ABD, Stryker units
had networked digital communications networks and access to high-capacity satellite
                                         xiii
xiv   Networked Forces in Stability Operations: 101st ABD, 3/2 and 1/25 SBCTs in Northern Iraq
Table S.1
U.S. Stability Objectives
Civilian Deaths
Figure S.1 plots reported civilians killed in action (KIAs) by month for all of Iraq and
for Mosul. As shown, the number of civilian KIAs per month surged in June 2004 and
remained roughly flat or increased slightly thereafter throughout Iraq as a whole. The
data indicate that there has not been any sustained reduction in civilian casualties in
Iraq overall after the peaks in February and August 2005.
     Before we turn to a detailed examination of each unit’s performance, we look at
trends in civilian and U.S. casualties in Iraq and in northern Iraq.
                                                                                                                                                              Summary xv
Figure S.1
Civilians Killed in All of Iraq and in Mosul
                                250                                                                                                                             2,500
                                                  101st ABD                       3/2 SBCT                                    1/25 SBCT
Civilian deaths in Mosul area
200 2,000
100 1,000
50 500
                                     0                                                                                                                          0
                                     03
                                                                                                                        05
                                                      3
04
                                                                                       04
                                                                             4
05
                                                                                                                                                         5
                                             -0
                                                            -0
                                                     -0
-0
-0
                                                                                                                                                         -0
                                                                             -0
-0
                                                                                                              -0
                                                                                                       -0
                                 n-
b-
                                                                                                                                     n-
                                                                  b-
                                                                                   n-
                                                          ec
                                                                                                                             pr
                                                   ct
pr
ec
                                                                                                                                                       ct
                                                                                                     ct
                                          ug
                                                                                                                                              ug
                                                                                            ug
                                Ju
                                                                                                                                    Ju
                                                                                                                   Fe
                                                                                  Ju
                                                                 Fe
                                                  O
                                                                                                                                                    O
                                                                                                  O
                                                          D
                                                                                                                         A
                                                                       A
                                                                                                            D
                                         A
                                                                                                                                          A
                                                                                        A
                                                  101st ABD            3/2 SBCT              1/25 SBCT              All of Iraq           Iraqi elections
    RAND MG593-S.1
      Figure S.1 also plots reported civilian KIAs for Mosul and indicates when each
unit operated in Mosul and elsewhere in northern Iraq. In comparison with civilian
KIAs elsewhere in Iraq, civilian KIAs in Mosul fall off sharply after June 2005. This
pattern is consistent with reports that the 1/25 SBCT defeated a major insurgent offen-
sive in Mosul, captured key insurgent leaders, and disrupted insurgent operations.
Figure S.2
U.S. Personnel Killed and Wounded in Action per Enemy Attack
                     0.10                                              0.60
Average number of
                                                                       0.50
                     0.08
    personnel
                                                                       0.40
                     0.06
                                                                       0.30
                     0.04
                                                                       0.20
                     0.02                                              0.10
                     0.00                                              0.00
                             101 ABD       3/2 SBCT     1/25 SBCT                 101 ABD    3/2 SBCT      1/25 SBCT
Figure S.3
U.S. Personnel Killed and Wounded in Action per Offensive Operation
                                                                       2.50
Average number of
                     0.40
                                                                       2.00
    personnel
                     0.30
                                                                       1.50
                     0.20
                                                                       1.00
                     0.10                                              0.50
                     0.00                                              0.00
                             101 ABD      3/2 SBCT      1/25 SBCT                 101 ABD    3/2 SBCT      1/25 SBCT
(adjusted for operational tempo [OPTEMPO] and enemy attacks) are the lowest of all
units in Area of Operation (AO) North.
      Our analysis of SBCT tactical defensive operations indicates the SBCT’s combined
materiel improvements (Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) and
digital communications) and nonmateriel improvements (doctrine; tactics, techniques,
and procedures [TTPs]; training) led to significant improvements in blue force quality
of information and situation awareness. In some cases, the SBCTs were able to capital-
ize on improved blue force awareness to execute a number of advanced tactics, includ-
ing accelerated planning, dynamic force retasking, self-synchronization, and swarm-
ing, which in turn led to improvements in performing tactical defensive missions. The
SBCTs displayed a robust dynamic response to enemy ambushes and attacks.
      The 1/25 SBCT also used these advanced tactics, new networked intelligence
capabilities, and decentralized operations to conduct targeted raids that enabled Stryker
units to respond quickly and effectively to intelligence tips. Further, these new intel-
ligence capabilities were integrated into the tactical capabilities of 1/25 SBCT units.1
These operations would not have been possible without the SBCTs’ information and
networking capabilities embedded at the tactical level.2
Figure S.4 summarizes the materiel and nonmateriel factors contributing to the perfor-
mance of the 101st ABD in Iraq. From a communications network technology perspec-
tive, the 101st ABD benefited from having FBCB2–Blue Force Tracking (FBCB2-BFT)
systems on some command and control (C2) vehicles and many helicopters (68 ground
systems and 88 aviation systems). The rest of its systems were the Army’s standard
issue—they relied on mobile subscriber equipment (MSE) and near-term digital radio
(NTDR) legacy equipment for communications and the All Source Analysis System
(ASAS) and other legacy systems for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance.
                                                                                                                   Operational Performance
                                                 Organization                                                      • Effective in patrols,
          Color legend                                                                                               “soft raid” and
                                       • Force structure: air mobile                                                 reconstruction
                    Worse                division—light infantry                                                     operations
                                         supported by helicopters                                                  • Established social
                                       • Resources: significant                                                       networks with Iraqi
                                         reconstruction funding; three                                               populace and local
                                         engineering battalions; division                                            leaders
                    Better               complements of chaplains, MPs,                                            • Limited effectiveness
                                         and intelligence analysis and                                               in HVT ops,
                                         HUMINT personnel                                                            counter-infiltration
                                                                                                                    Mission Effectiveness
                 Technology                      Information                               Process                 • Fairly high U.S.
                                                                              • Used traditional planning cycles     casualties/event
    • ISR: ASAS and other legacy        • Blue: significant information
      systems, COTS applications          on units at battalion and             to conduct offensive operations    • Number of attacks and
                                          higher; limited information         • Emphasis on law enforcement–         civilian casualties low
    • FBCB2/BFT on some C2
                                          on units below battalion              like patrols and raids               but increased over time
      vehicles and helicopters
                                        • Red and Green: limited,             • Worked with tribal leaders,        • Substantial insurgent
    • Communications: MSE
                                          with decreasing information           encouraged political dialog          infiltration into Mosul
      and NTDR legacy
      equipment                           from the population                                                      • Brought Sunni groups
                                                                              • Infrastructure projects
                                                                                                                     into political process,
                                                                                                                     but arrangements
                                                                                                                     degraded over time
                                                    People
                                                                                                                       External Factors
                                   • Training: focus on MCO-like operations
                                   • Command agility: quick change in focus                                        • Disbanding of Iraqi
                                     from MCO to stability operations                                                army and
                                                                                                                     de-Baathification leads
                                   • Commanders’ intent: focus on law                                                to riots
                                     enforcement–like operations and civil
                                     reconstruction                                                                • Initial collapse of the
                                                                                                                     Mosul police
                                                                                                                                               Networked Forces in Stability Operations: 101st ABD, 3/2 and 1/25 SBCTs in Northern Iraq
3  James Quinlivan conducted a historical analysis of the force ratios required to conduct stability operations.
He found that, historically, ratios of one to four soldiers per thousand residents were sufficient strictly for routine
policing (such as in post–World War II Germany); ratios of four to ten per thousand could be adequate, but at the
cost of carrying out harshly punitive actions; and ratios of ten or more per thousand were the norm for stability
operations. (See “Force Requirements in Stability Operations” Parameters, Winter 1995, pp. 59–69.)
Other documents randomly have
       different content
instruction is more precious than pure gold. The touchstone by
which he tests the quality of instruction, so as to distinguish genuine
teaching from its counterfeit, rote teaching, is thinking. The
schoolmaster who teaches by rote is satisfied if the pupils repeat his
words or those of the book; the true teacher sees to it that the
pupils think the thoughts which the words convey.
   Thring, who, next to Arnold, was perhaps the Thring’s practice.
greatest teacher England ever had, laid much
stress upon thinking. Sometimes he would startle a dull lad, in the
midst of an exercise, by asking, “What have you got sticking up
between your shoulders?” “My head,” was the reply. “How does it
differ from a turnip?” And by questioning he would elicit the answer,
“The head thinks; the turnip does not.”
  So important is thinking in all teaching that at Views of others.
the World’s Educational Congress, in 1893, one
educator after another rose in his place to emphasize the maxim,
“Make the pupils think.” One of the most advanced of the reformers
shouted in almost frantic tones, “Yes, make even the very babies
think.” After the wise men had returned to their homes, a Chicago
periodical raised the query, “How can you stop a pupil from
thinking?” And the conclusion it announced was that neither the
teacher behind the desk nor the tyrant upon his throne can stop a
pupil from thinking. Evidently, if that which sticks up between a boy’s
shoulders is a head and not a turnip, if the pupil is rational and not
an imbecile or an idiot, he does some thinking for himself; and the
maxim, “Make the pupils think,” requires further analysis before it
can be helpful in the art of teaching.
  We who teach are very apt to overestimate Thinking for one’s
thinking in our own line of work and to undervalue self. Relying on
thinking outside of the school. There is, perhaps, others.
as much good thought in a lady’s bonnet as in the
solution of a quadratic equation. A sewing-machine embodies as
much genuine thought as the demonstration of a geometrical
theorem. The construction of a locomotive or a railway bridge
displays as much effective thinking as Hegel’s “Philosophy of
History,” or Kant’s “Critique of the Pure Reason.” Most men think very
well in doing their own kind of work; in many other spheres of
activity they must let other people think for them. When the
professor of astronomy discusses a problem connected with his
science, he thinks for himself; but when he buys a piece of land, he
gets a lawyer to think for him in the examination of the title and the
preparation of the deed. The lawyer thinks for himself in the court-
house; but when he goes home to dine, he expects his wife, or the
cook, to have done the thinking for him in the preparation of the
dinner. Grover Cleveland had the reputation of thinking for himself:
many a politician found out that this reputation was founded on fact;
but when the ex-President is sick, or has the toothache, he is willing
to let a physician or a dentist think for him. In like manner, a pupil
may think very well upon the play-ground; but if the teacher, whose
very name indicates the function of guiding, fails to guide the pupil
aright, the latter may become a mere parrot in the class-room.
What, then, is involved in making a pupil think?
  The difficulty in answering this question is Thinking defined.
increased by the diversity of meanings of the word
thinking. The teacher who is not clear in his use of the term may
employ exercises calculated to develop one kind of mental activity,
and then accuse the pupils of dulness because they do not show
facility in some other intellectual process. When a text-book on
mental science defines the intellect as the power by which we think,
the term thinking is used to designate every form of intellectual
activity. The Century Dictionary defines thinking as an exercise of the
cognitive faculties in any way not involving outward observation, or
the passive reception of ideas from other minds. The logician defines
thinking as the process of comparing two ideas through their relation
to a third. Many exercises of the school are supposed to cultivate
thinking in the last sense of the word, when in reality they cultivate
thinking only in the widest acceptation of the term.
  The writer saw a normal school principal conduct     A faulty exercise.
an exercise in thinking, as the latter called it.
Turning to one of the pupils, he said, “Charley, will you please think
of something?” As soon as the boy raised his hand the principal
asked, “Does it belong to the animal, the vegetable, or the mineral
kingdom?” Then turning to the other members of the class, he said,
“Who of you can think of the vegetable in Charley’s mind?” The
names of at least forty different vegetables were given and spelled
and written upon the black-board. At last a pupil succeeded in
naming what was in Charley’s mind. Then there was a look of
triumph upon the faces of the principal and the class, as much as to
say, “Isn’t that splendid thinking?” At least one person felt like
burying his face in his hands for very shame; for here was
resurrected from the dead an old exercise of philanthropinism which
was buried more than a hundred years ago. What should one call
that kind of mental activity? Guessing. That is all it is. The exercise
tended to beget a habit very difficult to break up after it has been
formed.
   Far better was an exercise which the writer A better plan.
witnessed in a graded school. The teacher had
called the class in the second reader. As soon as all the pupils were
seated she said, “You may read the first paragraph.” Instead of
reading orally, the class became so quiet that one might have heard
a pin drop. After most of the hands were raised she called upon one
pupil to tell what the paragraph said. The second paragraph was
read and the substance of it stated in the pupil’s own words. An
omission was supplied by another pupil; an incorrect phrase was
modified by giving the correct words for conveying the thought. In
the course of the lesson it became necessary to clarify the ideas of
some. This was accomplished by a few pertinent questions which
made the pupils think for themselves. After the entire lesson had
been read in this way she dismissed the class without assigning a
lesson. Every member of the class went to his seat, took out his
slate, and began to write out the lesson in his own language. The
interest and pleasure depicted on their faces showed that it was not
a task but a joy to express thought by the pencil. The teacher had
given them something to think about; she had taught them to
express their thoughts in spoken and written language; her
questions had stimulated their thinking, and when, later in the day,
the lesson in oral reading was given, the vocal utterance showed
that every pupil understood what he was reading. There was no
parrot-like utterance of vocables, but an expression of thought based
upon a thorough understanding and appreciation of what was read.
The silent reading was an exercise in thought-getting and thought-
begetting, the language lesson upon the slate was an exercise in
active thinking through written words, and the oral expression
furnished a test by which the teacher could ascertain what she had
accomplished in getting her pupils to think.
   The first thing necessary in making the pupil A suggestive
think is best shown by relating another incident. reply.
The catalogue of a well-known school announced
that the teachers were aiming to get their pupils to read Latin at
sight and to think in more tongues than one. A captious
superintendent wrote to the principal, saying, “I envy you. How do
you do it? We would be satisfied if we could make pupils think in
English.” The reply was equally sharp and suggestive: “You ask how
we make pupils think. I answer, By giving them something to think
about. If you ask how we make them think in more tongues than
one, I answer, By giving them, in addition to the materials of
thought, the instruments of thought as found in two or more
languages.”
   The first step in training a pupil to think is to The first essential.
furnish him proper materials of thought, to develop
in his mind the concepts which lie at the basis of a branch of study,
and which must be analyzed, compared, and combined in new forms
during the prosecution of that study. Just as little as a boy can draw
fish from an empty pond, so little can he draw ideas, thoughts, and
conclusions from an empty head. If the fundamental ideas are not
carefully developed when the study of a new science is begun, all
subsequent thinking on the part of the pupil is necessarily hazy,
uncertain, unsatisfactory. How can a pupil compare two ideas or
concepts and join them in a correct judgment if there is nothing in
his mind except the technical terms by which the scientist denotes
these ideas? The idea of number lies at the basis of arithmetic. How
often are beginners expected to think in figures without having a
clear idea of what figures denote! What teacher has not seen
children wrestling with fractions who had no idea of a fraction save
that of two figures, one above the other, with a line between them!
How many of our arithmetics are full of problems involving business
transactions of which the pupil cannot possibly have an adequate
idea! Not having clear ideas of the things to be compared, how can
the learner form clear and accurate judgments and conclusions?
  So essential to correct thinking is the Proper thought-
development of the concepts and ideas which lie at material.
the basis of each science, that we may designate
the giving to the pupil of something to think about as the first and
most important step in the solution of the educational problem
before us. In other words, the furnishing of the proper materials of
thought is the first step in teaching others to think. The force and
the validity of this proposition are easily seen if we reflect upon the
essential oneness of the manifold diversities of thinking as they
appear at school and in subsequent years.
  It is universally conceded that education should Thinking in the
be a preparation for life. The thinking at school professions.
should be an adumbration of the thinking beyond
the school. The possession of enough data, or thought-materials, for
reaching trustworthy conclusions, which is the indispensable
requisite of successful thinking at school, is likewise a necessary
requisite of successful thinking in practical life. It behooves us to
inquire into the nature and foundation of the thinking of men in the
professions, and in other vocations, for the purpose of gaining
further light upon the problem before us. Let us, then, inquire into
the nature and foundation of the thinking of men eminent in a
profession or prominent in some other vocation. The professional
man may have less native ability, less general knowledge, less
culture and education, less mental power than the client whom he
advises or the patient for whom he prescribes; and yet his
inferences and conclusions are accepted as more trustworthy than
those of men outside of the given profession, because he has a
knowledge of facts and data which they do not possess. If he be a
physician, special training and professional experience have taught
him how to observe the symptoms of different diseases; how to
eliminate sources of doubt and error; how to reach a correct
diagnosis of difficult cases, and how to apply the proper remedies. If
he be a lawyer, he has been taught how to examine court records;
how to detect and guard against flaws in legal documents; how to
find and interpret the law in specific cases; how to protect the life
and property of his client. The judge on the bench is learned in the
law, though he may be ignorant of science, literature, agriculture,
commerce, and manufactures. He is aided in arriving at correct
conclusions by thought-materials which are not in the possession of
laymen.
   How does the thinking of an expert differ from The thinking of
that of other men? Not so much in the processes of experts.
thought as in the data upon which he reasons. An
                                                       Teaching not a
ordinary witness may testify as to matters of fact; trade.
the expert is supposed to possess extensive
knowledge and superior discrimination in a particular branch of
learning or practice; hence he may be a witness in matters as to
which ordinary observers cannot form just conclusions, and he is
held liable for negligence in case he injures another from want of
proper qualifications or proper use of the thought-materials
necessary to form trustworthy conclusions. From this point of view
we can see new force and beauty in the remark of Fitch that
teaching is the noblest of the professions, but the sorriest of trades.
The aim of a trade is to make something that will sell; its ultimate
aim is money, a livelihood. Teaching and the other professions,
although they cannot be sundered from money-making, have a
nobler aim. This arises out of the thought-materials with which they
deal. If a teacher’s mind does not busy itself with these, he sinks to
the level of a tradesman. A very keen observer said of the head of a
large boarding-school, that he had learned his trade from the
principal of a large normal school under whom he had been trained.
The remark, if true, was severe, but significant. It was an intimation
that the substance of the thinking of these two men was business
rather than education; that their conversation about the quality of
the beef and mutton served, about the loaves of bread, the pounds
of butter, and the bushels of potatoes consumed each week,
indicated that they were thinking more of the stomach and the purse
than of the things of the mind; that their aim was a large attendance
and a large cash-balance at the end of the year rather than the
mental growth and professional preparation of their students. Their
thinking was efficient and trustworthy in the domain in which it was
exercised. It partook of the nature of trade-thinking, and lacked
professional quality because it did not concern itself with problems
of mental growth and moral training, with the proper sequence of
studies, with the educational value of different kinds of knowledge,
and with the best methods of economizing the time and effort of
their students.
   In several aspects teaching is like a trade. Every Mysteries.
art has its mysteries, with which those who
practise it must be familiar if they would succeed. Teaching is no
exception; and if the annual institute or the school of pedagogy fails
to clarify these mysteries by putting the teachers in possession of
materials for thought and of methods of applying knowledge to
beget thinking which are not within the ken of the average parent
and the general public, then failure must be written over the
outcome. A mystery is a lesson to be learned. A scrutiny of the
mysteries which characterize every trade and every art will serve not
merely to emphasize the necessity for furnishing proper thought-
materials, but will be helpful also in paving the way for the
consideration of another essential in training pupils to think. Let us
view them in the concrete.
  A machinist, who was also a skilled mechanic, Examples.
was compelled by circumstances to quit his trade
and to accept a position as janitor. One day the pipe leading from
the sink to the sewer was clogged. The teacher, in conjunction with
a carpenter, worked a long time to fix it, but in vain. The janitor was
called, who in a few moments overcame the difficulty by the
application of a principle in natural philosophy on which the teacher
could have talked learnedly, although he knew not how to apply it in
the given case. The janitor related how the foreman in a foundry
was baffled in the effort to bore a hole through a piece of iron until a
workman, trained under a foreign master, suggested the purchase of
two things at a drug-store by means of which the hole was easily
bored. When the druggist asked about the use that was to be made
of these chemicals, he was told that the use was one of the
mysteries of the machinist’s trade.
   Next, the carpenter fixed the mortise lock of a door which needed
attention, and the others lauded the skill with which he handled his
tools and applied his knowledge. Before the three separated, the
janitor’s son came with a word which he could not find in his lexicon.
With the aid of chalk and black-board and grammar, the teacher
showed how to dig out the roots of a Greek verb and what beautiful
changes occur in its conjugation. The turn had come for the
tradesmen to admire the mysterious skill and power of the teacher.
  In applying the principle of natural philosophy, the janitor made
skilful use of one or two tools which the teacher and the carpenter
had never seen. He could express thought through the tools of his
own handicraft, in ways that they could not. Each one of the three
men knew the tools and the mysteries of his own vocation. During
the entire scene there was not a logical flaw in the thinking of any
one of them. Probably there was little difference in their native
ability; certainly none in the fundamental nature of their thought-
processes. The practical difference resulted from the data at their
command and from the tools they were using to express the
thoughts peculiar to their several vocations.
  The power to use tools, instruments, and              Man, the tool-
machinery lifts man above the brute creation.           user.
There is labor-saving machinery in thinking as well
                                                        Instruments of
as in manual labor. The more perfect the tools with     thought the
which we work the greater the results we can second essential.
achieve without waste of effort. In thinking as well
as in working we must use the best tools in order to attain the
greatest facility and efficiency. Yonder are two wheat-fields. In one
of them a giant is wielding the sickle of our forefathers; in the other
a youth, not yet out of his teens, is at work. At the close of the day
the work of the giant will not bear comparison with that of the lad,
because the latter was sitting upon a self-binder. They had the same
material to work upon, yet, in spite of his superior strength, the
giant could not cope with his weaker though better-equipped
competitor. In like manner, the youth who has mastered the
algebraic equation, or the symbols and formulas of chemistry, is in
many respects the superior of a much brighter man who is not in
possession of these tools or instruments of thought. A boy of
average capacity who goes through a good high school thereby
acquires certain fundamental ideas and the accompanying
instruments of thought by which he is enabled to solve problems
entirely beyond the power of a much brighter boy who never studies
beyond the grammar grade.
   The instruments of thought are generally spoken Confusion in
of as symbols, whilst the materials of thought are thought and
the things for which the symbols stand. In thinking, practice.
the mind may employ the ideas which correspond
to the things in the external world; or it may employ the symbols by
which science indicates things that have been definitely fixed or
quantified. Failure to distinguish the sign from the thing signified,
the symbol from its reality, leads to confusion in thought and to the
most disastrous results in mental development. Loss of appetite for
knowledge must inevitably result from methods of teaching by which
the pupil is expected to learn the sounds of the letters from their
names, or musical sounds from the notation on the staff, or the
ideas of number from the arabic notation, or a knowledge of flowers
from the technical terms of a text-book, or a knowledge of chemical
elements and substances from the definitions, descriptions, and
formulas of a scientific treatise. The symbol is indispensable in
advanced thinking; but to expect the learner to get the fundamental
ideas of a science from words, symbols, and definitions is evidence
that the teacher does not understand the nature of thinking. It may,
therefore, be helpful to set forth clearly the important distinction
between thinking in things and thinking in symbols; to point out
their relative value in mental development; and to fix their place in a
rational system of education.
                               II
    THINKING IN THINGS AND IN SYMBOLS
                               II
             THINKING IN THINGS AND IN SYMBOLS
                               III
                   THE MATERIALS OF THOUGHT
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookultra.com