Germany: Comprehensive Position on Abortion

Rights and Reproductive Health

Germany’s delegation affirms that access to safe abortion and comprehensive reproductive health services
is essential to women’s human rights and public health. The Federal Republic of Germany aligns its policies
with international standards – including United Nations treaties and Sustainable Development Goals – to
protect women’s dignity, life and health. Under the German Basic Law (Grundgesetz), human dignity is
inviolable and every person has a right to life and physical integrity. While Germany’s Criminal Code
(Strafgesetzbuch §218–§218a) still technically outlaws abortion, it provides broad exceptions (after
mandatory counseling and a short waiting period, or on medical and criminal grounds) 1 2 . In practice,
abortions performed within 12 weeks of conception following counseling, or in cases of rape or serious
health threat, are permitted and not prosecuted 1 2 . Germany actively promotes contraceptive access
and sexual education to reduce unintended pregnancies, and supports women’s voluntary choice and safe
medical care.

Internationally, Germany upholds all women’s sexual and reproductive rights consistent with UN human
rights law. The Sustainable Development Goals explicitly recognize these rights: SDG 3.7 calls on all States
“to ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services, including… information and
education” 3 . The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and WHO
advise that restrictive laws endanger women’s health. For example, the World Health Organization
emphasizes that limiting abortion access does not reduce abortion rates but forces women into unsafe
procedures, with grave consequences 4 5 . WHO notes that almost half of all induced abortions globally
are unsafe, making unsafe abortion “an important preventable cause of maternal deaths and
morbidities” 4 6 . In fact, WHO data show that in regions where unsafe abortions are common, maternal
death rates can exceed 200 per 100,000 procedures 6 . As the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) observes,
“restricting access to abortion does not prevent people from seeking abortion, it simply makes it
more deadly.” 45% of all abortions worldwide are unsafe 7 . The 1994 Cairo Programme of Action – a UN
agreement ratified by Germany – explicitly calls on states to provide post-abortion care regardless of
legality and to ensure all people have quality information about reproductive health and contraception 8 .

International human rights bodies have repeatedly urged Germany (and all states) to liberalize overly
restrictive abortion laws. WHO’s latest abortion-care guidelines recommend shifting “from grounds-based
approaches to restricting access to abortion” toward allowing abortion “on the request of the woman… or
other pregnant person” 9 . The guideline further counsels against requiring medically unnecessary delays
or burdens that can “make abortion inaccessible” 10 9 . Likewise, the UN Human Rights Council and
Treaty Bodies have stressed that forcing delays or stigmatizing counseling violates women’s rights to
health, privacy and non-discrimination 10 . Germany’s current law – which requires counseling and a three-
day waiting period for elective abortions – is a compromise rooted in case law, but Germany acknowledges
these requirements can constitute barriers. The German Government has considered reforms (for example,
recent removal of the advertising ban for abortion services) to ease access while respecting constitutional
protections of life. Germany emphasizes that any policy on abortion must balance women’s autonomy with
ethical considerations, but always with priority on preserving life and health.

1
International Obligations and Standards
• UN Treaties and Declarations: Germany is party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and CEDAW. These instruments recognize the right to the highest
attainable standard of health (ICESCR Art. 12) and obligate states to eliminate discrimination against
women (CEDAW). UN commentary interprets these as requiring access to maternal health care and
family planning. CEDAW’s Committee has repeatedly urged Germany to ensure safe, accessible
abortion and to remove punitive restrictions.
• ICPD and Beijing Platform: Germany fully supports the 1994 International Conference on
Population and Development and the 1995 Beijing Declaration. The ICPD Plan of Action explicitly
linked women’s empowerment and reproductive rights to global development, calling on all
countries to provide family planning and maternal health services. In particular, ICPD stressed that
“all people should be able to access quality information about their reproductive health and
contraceptives” 8 and urged universal access to safe abortion where legal.
• SDG 3 (Health) and SDG 5 (Gender Equality): Under Agenda 2030, Germany works towards SDG 3.7
(“universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services, including family planning”) and
SDG 5.6 (“ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights”).
Germany contributes to UN indicators (e.g. family planning coverage) and aligns its health programs
with these goals.
• WHO Guidelines: Germany relies on WHO technical guidelines for safe abortion and reproductive
health. WHO explicitly includes comprehensive abortion care in essential health services and notes
that when done by trained providers, “abortion is very safe” 11 . WHO counsels that first-trimester
medical abortion can even be self-managed if women have proper information and medication 12 .
WHO’s evidence-based recommendations inform German medical training and protocols.

Germany’s Legal Framework on Abortion

While not enumerated in the Basic Law, Germany’s constitution (Grundgesetz) provides the legal backdrop:
- Human Dignity and Life (Art. 1 & 2): “Human dignity is inviolable… It shall be respected and protected by
all state authority.” Every person has a “right to life and physical integrity.” These provisions underlie the
German court’s view that unborn human life deserves protection, but also that the pregnant woman’s rights
must be balanced.
- Gender Equality (Art. 3): Guarantees equal rights for men and women. The State must promote de facto
equality. Germany interprets this to support women’s access to health care and to eliminate discrimination
in reproductive health.
- Marriage and Family (Art. 6): Declares marriage and the family under special state protection;
“Motherhood is under the special protection of the state.” This has been used to justify both protecting the
unborn child and providing support for families and mothers.

Under this constitutional framework, Germany’s Criminal Code §§218–219b strictly regulates abortion:
- §218 StGB (Abortion): “Whosoever terminates a pregnancy shall be liable to imprisonment up to three
years or a fine.” (Specially serious cases up to five years.) If a woman undergoes an abortion herself, the
punishment is lighter (up to one year or a fine) 13 14 .
- §218a StGB (Exemptions): Provides that an abortion is not unlawful (i.e. exempt from §218) if: (1) the
pregnant woman obtains mandatory counseling at least three days prior and then requests the abortion;
(2) the abortion is performed by a physician; and (3) it occurs within 12 weeks of conception 1 . In addition,
an abortion is exempt if a physician certifies it is medically necessary to avert danger to the woman’s life or

2
her physical or mental health 2 , or if the pregnancy is the result of a sexual crime (rape/incest) and is
within 12 weeks 15 . Beyond 12 weeks, abortions are only lawful if two physicians determine the woman is
in “special distress” and termination up to 22 weeks is permitted 16 .
- §219a StGB (Advertising): Until recently, physicians were prohibited from “advertising” abortion services.
This was overturned in 2019, following a court decision and public debate, so doctors can now freely inform
patients about their services. This reflects Germany’s effort to reduce stigma and barriers.

In summary, Germany’s law decriminalizes most abortions in practice, subject to procedural safeguards.
Mandatory counseling (often by state-certified centers) serves to inform and ensure voluntary consent; the
three-day waiting period is intended as a reflection period. Germany’s Supreme Court has twice (1975,
1993) upheld this framework as a “compromise” balancing woman’s autonomy with fetal protection. Current
proposals in the Bundestag aim to simplify procedures and protect patient autonomy (for example, by
eliminating fees for counseling or ensuring insurance coverage), all while maintaining health exceptions.

German Policies and Initiatives

Beyond legislation, Germany implements numerous measures to support reproductive health:
- Family Planning and Sex Education: Comprehensive sexuality education is mandatory in German
schools. The Federal Centre for Health Education (Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung) provides
evidence-based programs on contraception and healthy relationships. Modern contraceptives and
counseling are widely available and reimbursed by public insurance. These preventive measures keep
Germany’s unintended pregnancy rate relatively low among comparable countries.
- Health Insurance Coverage: Under Germany’s social health insurance, medically indicated abortions (e.g.
to protect the woman’s health or in cases of rape) are fully covered. Abortions under §218a (after
counseling) are not covered as a medical need; however, the counseling itself is paid for by the government.
Non-profit women’s clinics and hospitals perform procedures at minimal or no cost. Germany is reviewing
whether to expand insurance coverage, as part of gender equality policy.
- Reproductive Rights Advocacy: German civil society (e.g. Deutscher Frauenrat) and government regularly
assess abortion access. In 2019, the government responded to UN criticism by promising to alleviate
practical barriers (such as lack of providers in rural areas and linguistic obstacles for migrants). Germany
funds international sexual and reproductive health projects via the Federal Ministry for Economic
Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and foreign aid programs, emphasizing safe abortion in humanitarian
settings as part of global maternal health aid.
- Data Monitoring: The Federal Statistical Office compiles annual data on abortion (nearly 100,000 in 2020)
and reports them to the Federal Health Ministry. Germany also cooperates in WHO and EU research on
abortion safety and maternal mortality. In parliamentary reports, the government affirms that improved
access and education help keep Germany’s abortion rate below the EU average.

Germany’s International Engagement

Germany champions women’s rights and reproductive health in the UN and EU. We note:
- Condemnation of Unsafe Practices: German delegates have supported UN Human Rights Council
statements on gender-based violence, including obstetric violence and forced pregnancy. Germany calls for
implementation of WHO recommendations, such as safe abortion care in the UN’s global health agenda.
- Humanitarian Settings: Germany emphasizes that abortion services are lifesaving in crises. As UNFPA
warns, rolling back reproductive health aid forces “women in crisis zones … to give birth without medicines,
midwives or equipment, putting their lives and their babies’ lives in jeopardy” 17 . Germany contributes to

3
humanitarian aid for sexual health (including funding for emergency obstetric care and contraception in
refugee camps) and calls on partners to include safe abortion in emergency medical kits.
- Engagement with UN Women: We welcome UN Women’s leadership on gender equality. Although
specific UN Women quotes on abortion are not available, Germany supports joint UN calls (by WHO, UNFPA,
UNICEF etc.) affirming that reproductive rights are human rights. Germany encourages UN Women to
highlight access to safe abortion as part of gender equality, since only by protecting women’s bodies can
true parity be achieved.

Confronting Other Delegations

In multilateral debate, the German delegation will firmly challenge countries that deny or severely restrict
abortion access. Citing UN data and human rights norms, Germany will ask pointed questions of nations
with poor records on women’s reproductive rights:

• To the Islamic Republic of Iran: We note UN human rights experts have condemned Iran’s 2021
“Youthful Population” law as a “crippling” assault on women’s health, explicitly violating the rights to
life, health and equality 18 . The law criminalizes nearly all abortions (even for contraceptive failure)
and threatens women with life imprisonment or worse. Germany asks: How does the Islamic Republic
reconcile these punitive restrictions with its international obligations to protect women’s lives and health?
According to WHO and UNFPA data, such bans do not stop abortions but lead to clandestine, unsafe
procedures 4 7 . Is Iran prepared to bear the public health consequences of refusing safe
abortion care?

• To the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: While we respect cultural differences, Germany is deeply
concerned that Saudi law effectively prohibits abortion (except in extremely limited cases),
compounding maternal risks. WHO warns that “restrictive abortion regulation” increases unsafe
abortions and “violates a range of human rights” 10 . How does Saudi Arabia address the maternal
mortality and suffering caused by such strict limits? The German delegation expects clarification on
compliance with treaties like CEDAW that commit all parties to ensure women’s health.

• To the Federal Republic of Nigeria: Nigeria is an important partner, but its near-total abortion ban
(with penalties up to 10 years) correlates with a maternal mortality rate among the world’s highest.
WHO data show unsafe abortion is a leading killer of Nigerian women. Germany asks: What steps is
Nigeria taking to reduce unsafe abortion and maternal deaths, given these laws? Nigeria’s restrictions
run counter to the ICPD programme, which urges post-abortion care to save lives, irrespective of
legality 8 .

• To the Republic of Poland: As a neighboring EU member, Poland’s near-complete abortion

prohibition (struck down recently by its Constitutional Tribunal) is troubling. Germany questions: How
can Poland, a signatory of human rights instruments, justify banning abortion even in cases of fetal
disability, when WHO guidelines advise against forcible pregnancy continuation in such cases 9 ? EU law
emphasizes women’s health, and yet Polish law has forced many women to travel abroad for care or
risk lethal clandestine abortions. Germany urges Poland to adhere to the EU Charter of Fundamental
Rights, which guarantees equality and human dignity for all women.

• To the United States of America: Germany considers the USA a close friend, yet we must
diplomatically address recent developments. After the US Supreme Court’s overturn of Roe v. Wade,

4
 Germany seeks understanding: In reversing a long-standing precedent, how does the US intend to fulfill
its commitments to women’s health and gender equality? We note that UNFPA has stressed that rolling
back abortion access anywhere “gives legitimacy to growing anti-women’s rights” globally. Germany
respectfully calls on the US delegation to confirm that humanitarian funding and health programs
for women’s reproductive services in crisis regions (which the US previously supported) will continue,
despite domestic legal changes. (See also Germany’s stance below on the US situation.)

Germany’s Questions and Answers – Delegation of Germany

Anticipating points of inquiry from other delegates about Germany’s policy, we prepare the following Q&A:

• Q: “Why does Germany still have abortion in its Criminal Code (§218) rather than fully
legalizing it on request? Isn’t this outdated?”
A: Germany’s legal regime is the result of constitutional considerations. The Federal Constitutional
Court held that life in the womb must be protected, but that women’s autonomy also matters. Thus,
the current compromise allows abortion without punishment up to 12 weeks after counseling.
Germany has liberalized its law substantially since reunification (e.g. 1995 reforms and recent
removal of the advertising ban). The mandatory counseling is intended to ensure informed consent;
however, Germany acknowledges WHO guidance that excessive barriers should be reduced 10 .
Debate is ongoing in Germany to further ease access (for instance, simplifying procedures and
considering insurance coverage), always within constitutional limits.

• Q: “Some civil society groups argue that requiring a waiting period and counseling stigmatizes
women. Is Germany addressing this?”
A: Germany recognizes this concern. Counseling is conducted by neutral, state-approved centers and
focuses on support and information – it is not meant to dissuade. The three-day period was
instituted as a “cooling-off” measure but was not intended to shame; Germany is reviewing ways to
make this process as respectful and efficient as possible. Importantly, studies show counseling can
ensure women understand all options (including adoption) and confirm their decision is voluntary.
Nevertheless, Germany is open to reforming these procedures in line with WHO’s best practices 9
10 .

• Q: “How does Germany ensure abortion access for disadvantaged or rural women?”
A: Germany’s health insurance and federal policies aim to make abortion available nationwide.
Doctors and clinics in both cities and rural areas provide services (and conscientious objectors must
refer patients to willing providers). Telemedicine has been introduced (especially during the
COVID-19 pandemic) to reach remote patients. Germany also distributes emergency contraception
and has mobile health units. EU cross-border cooperation assists women who cannot obtain services
at home. We continuously monitor that no group faces undue obstacles, in keeping with SDG 3.7 on
universal access to reproductive health 3 .

• Q: “What is Germany’s position on conscientious objection by healthcare providers?”

A: German law protects providers’ right of conscience, but requires that they refer patients to
another qualified doctor promptly. The State ensures sufficient alternate providers are available so
that conscientious objection does not deny women timely care. In fact, WHO specifically
recommends that if conscientious objection blocks access, it should not be permitted 19 . Germany
works to balance these rights and may consider regulation if service gaps arise.

5
 • Q: “Germany strongly supports gender equality. Does it believe abortion is a human right?”
A: Germany regards safe abortion as a component of women’s right to health and autonomy, but
stops short of declaring an absolute “right” to abortion in law. It is treated as a regulated health
service. Germany upholds international standards (ICPD, CEDAW) affirming reproductive choice as
essential. In practice, German health policy makes safe abortion accessible under the exceptions
noted, and treats refusal of necessary abortion as potential human rights violation. The emphasis is
on pragmatic protection of women’s health (a right under Article 12 ICESCR) rather than enshrining
abortion on demand.

Germany’s 200-Word Stance on U.S. Abortion Rights (Diplomatic

Tone)
Germany expresses deep regret over the United States Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in
June 2022. The German Government respects the independence of the U.S. judiciary and the principle of
national sovereignty in constitutional matters. At the same time, Germany notes that this ruling marks a
significant retreat in reproductive rights protection. Germany’s stance is to reaffirm that access to safe, legal
abortion is a global public health and human rights priority. We emphasize that any rights roll-back may
undermine maternal health and gender equality, goals to which both Germany and the United States
remain committed under international law. In multilateral forums, Germany will continue to collaborate
with the United States on shared objectives, including promoting maternal health and protecting women in
crisis regions. Germany calls on all partners to ensure that humanitarian funding (such as for midwifery,
rape treatment, and family planning) remains robust. Diplomatic channels will be used to convey respect for
differing legal systems, while underlining Germany’s firm position that women everywhere benefit from
safe, regulated abortion access and that scientific evidence shows such access saves lives.

Moderated Caucus Speeches by Germany (60–70 seconds each)

1. Ensuring Access to Abortion in Conflict and Humanitarian Settings

Germany stresses that in crises and conflicts, reproductive health services – including abortion care – are
life-saving. Women in emergencies are at heightened risk of sexual violence and unintended pregnancy.
UNFPA warns that if reproductive health programs are defunded, “women in crisis zones will be forced to give
birth without medicines, midwives or equipment, putting their lives and their babies’ lives in jeopardy.” 17
Germany pledges to maintain safe abortion access in all its humanitarian missions. We call on UN agencies
to include safe abortion in emergency obstetric kits and on all Member States to fund reproductive health in
refugee camps. Ensuring contraception and safe abortion in conflict not only protects lives but honors our
commitments under the SDGs and the 1994 ICPD.

2. Cultural and Religious Barriers to Abortion Access

Germany recognizes that cultural and religious beliefs influence national policies, but insists that such
beliefs must not override women’s rights. WHO emphasizes that restrictive abortion laws can “violate a
range of human rights” and impose heavy burdens 10 . Delegations like the Holy See have explicitly
rejected including abortion under reproductive health 20 , reflecting divergent perspectives. Germany’s
position is that personal beliefs cannot justify policies that endanger women’s health. We urge all countries
to respect medical science and human rights above ideology. Abortion decisions should remain between a

6
woman and her doctor, not dictated by cultural taboos. Germany calls on all Member States to eliminate
laws rooted in dogma and to promote understanding: access to safe abortion and family planning is
compatible with all religious teachings that value life and compassion.

3. Role of UN Women in Advancing Global Abortion Access

UN Women – as the UN’s lead agency on gender equality – plays a crucial role in framing abortion access as
a women’s rights issue. Germany applauds UN Women’s advocacy for comprehensive sexual and
reproductive health in gender policy. Alongside WHO and UNFPA, UN Women has repeatedly affirmed that
reproductive rights are human rights. For example, joint UN statements (by WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, UNAIDS,
and UN Women) have called for unhindered SRH access for all. Germany encourages UN Women to
continue supporting data-driven policies: UN Women’s research on gender gaps directly links women’s
autonomy to socioeconomic development. By championing safe abortion access, UN Women helps advance
SDG 5 (gender equality) and SDG 3 (health). Germany stands ready to back UN Women initiatives – from
training programs to legislative guidance – that empower women to make informed reproductive choices.

4. Ensuring Informed Consent in Abortion Procedures

Germany fully endorses the principle that women must give free, informed consent for any medical
procedure. In abortion care, this means providing comprehensive, unbiased counseling. WHO’s Abortion
Care Guideline mandates that clients have “access to scientifically accurate, understandable information at
all stages” of care 21 . German law’s mandatory counseling requirement is intended to fulfill this – it
informs women of all legal options and medical facts. Germany will continue to train counselors rigorously
to ensure neutrality. We support public campaigns to educate women about their rights. Germany also calls
for international exchange of best practices: for example, WHO recommends using clear decision aids and
multilingual materials. Ensuring informed consent respects women’s autonomy and reduces coercion,
aligning with human rights standards.

5. Implementing Sexual Education for Teenagers to Prevent Unwanted Pregnancies

Prevention is key. Germany’s experience shows that comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) drastically
reduces teen pregnancy and abortion rates. The UN Sustainable Development Goals endorse CSE as vital:
SDG 4 on quality education and SDG 3.7 on health both imply the need for information. Indeed, the ICPD
Programme stressed that “all people should be able to access quality information about their
reproductive health and contraceptives.” 8 . Germany mandates age-appropriate CSE in schools
nationwide, covering contraception, consent, and anatomy. We encourage UN support for similar curricula
globally. Germany also funds youth-friendly health centers. By teaching teenagers early – as WHO data
confirm – societies can lower the incidence of unintended pregnancies and ensure that abortions, when
they occur, are truly voluntary and safe.

6. The Role of Telemedicine and Medical Abortion in Expanding Access

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of telemedicine for abortion, a practice Germany supported.
WHO recognizes that a first-trimester medical abortion can be safely self-managed at home, if the woman
has “access to accurate information, quality medicines and support” 12 . Germany’s regulation now allows
remote prescription of abortion pills by certified doctors, combined with telecounseling. This innovation
expands access for rural women and those under lockdown, without compromising safety. Germany urges

7
UN agencies to promote telehealth: it is especially valuable in pandemic responses and in countries with
few providers. By championing evidence-based telemedicine, we can ensure that legal rights translate into
real care – people who need abortion should not have to travel long distances or delay treatment for
bureaucratic reasons.

7. Decriminalization of Abortion: A Public Health Approach

Germany frames abortion decriminalization as a matter of public health. As WHO points out, “restricting
access to abortions does not reduce the number of abortions; however, it does affect whether the abortions that
women and girls attain are safe and dignified.” 5 . Criminal penalties tend to push women toward
clandestine, dangerous procedures. Germany cites UNFPA findings: in countries where abortion is highly
restricted, unsafe abortions surge 7 . Therefore, Germany maintains that moving abortion from the
criminal code to the health code (with medical regulation but without punishment) is vital. Decriminalization
reduces stigma and encourages women to seek professional care. Germany also emphasizes treating
women who have had abortions as patients in need of support, not as offenders. This approach – urged by
international health bodies – improves outcomes for both women and children, and aligns with the right to
life and health.

8. Legal Ambiguities in Abortion Laws and Impact on Healthcare Delivery

Finally, Germany highlights that unclear or contradictory laws on abortion create confusion and endanger
care. WHO’s Abortion Care Guideline warns against “grounds-based approaches” and recommends moving
to abortion-on-request policies 9 . When laws are vague, doctors may refuse treatment out of fear of
prosecution, and women may not know their rights. Germany itself has made its regulations clear: as noted,
counseling and time limits are codified in §218a StGB 1 . Germany proposes that nations simplify their
legal frameworks so that healthcare providers can focus on patient care, not legal technicalities. We support
UN technical assistance to harmonize laws with human rights – for example, ensuring rape exceptions and
eliminating retroactive penalties, as recommended by WHO. Clear, rights-based laws guarantee that women
and girls, especially the most vulnerable, can access timely abortion services without delay.

Questions for Other Delegations: Germany calls on all Member States to reflect on the data and
standards above. In particular, Germany asks: How do you reconcile restrictive national laws with your
obligations under international covenants? What actions are you taking to prevent unsafe abortions, in light of
WHO’s evidence? We especially look to delegations from Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, and Poland – countries
on our delegate roster with troubling practices – to explain how their policies serve women’s health and
fundamental rights. Germany will quote UN experts as needed to underline that every day lost in unsafe
care is a human rights issue.

Conclusion: Germany remains committed to advancing women’s reproductive rights through law, policy,
education, and international cooperation. We will continue to quote and uphold the authoritative findings
of WHO, UNFPA and other bodies (e.g. “45% of abortions are unsafe…countries with restrictive laws see more
unsafe abortion” 7 4 ) in diplomatic debate. By combining principled leadership with practical measures,
Germany seeks to ensure that every woman has the right and ability to decide freely the course of her
pregnancy, fully supported by the healthcare system.

Sources: Authoritative data and guidance from UN agencies and human rights bodies have informed this
position paper, including WHO and UNFPA fact sheets and statements 4 7 9 , the German penal code

8
as reported by the WHO Global Abortion Policies Database 1 2 , and UN General Assembly deliberations
22 . All policy positions above are framed in accordance with these verified sources.

1 2 9 13 14 15 16 19 21 Germany - GAPD - The Global Abortion Policies Database

https://abortion-policies.srhr.org/country/germany/

3 Goal 3 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs

https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal3

4 5 6 10 11 12 Abortion
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion

7 8 UNFPA statement on the global implications of new restrictions to access to abortion

https://www.unfpa.org/press/unfpa-statement-global-implications-new-restrictions-access-abortion

17 Statement by UNFPA Executive Director on the United States Government funding cuts
https://www.unfpa.org/press/statement-unfpa-executive-director-united-states-government-funding-cuts

18 IRAN - Repeal “crippling” new anti-abortion law – UN human rights experts say - International Campaign

for Women's Right to Safe Abortion

https://www.safeabortionwomensright.org/news/iran-repeal-crippling-new-anti-abortion-law-un-human-rights-experts-say/

20 22General Assembly Adopts Inclusive Global Health Resolution, as Several Delegates Reject Language
on Protecting Reproductive Rights, Promoting Access to Medicine | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases
https://press.un.org/en/2019/ga12225.doc.htm