Jones Parker Case Files Maselli Christopher P N Hoose Bob Download
Jones Parker Case Files Maselli Christopher P N Hoose Bob Download
https://ebookbell.com/product/jones-parker-case-files-maselli-
christopher-p-n-hoose-bob-8211870
https://ebookbell.com/product/jones-parker-case-files-the-nemesis-
focus-on-the-family-47348962
https://ebookbell.com/product/jones-parker-case-files-aio-team-aio-
team-33373642
https://ebookbell.com/product/business-skills-allinone-for-dummies-
consumer-dummies-mary-ann-anderson-dr-edward-g-anderson-jr-dr-
geoffrey-parker-dawna-jones-stan-portny-joel-elad-natalie-canavor-
ryan-deiss-russ-henneberry-34622354
https://ebookbell.com/product/in-between-a-katie-parker-production-
act-i-jenny-b-jones-13858736
The Perfect Reunion Jones Parker
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-perfect-reunion-jones-
parker-232367510
The Life And Music Of Alice Mary Smith 18391884 A Woman Composer Of
The Victorian Era A Critical Assessment Of Her Achievement Ian
Grahamjones
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-life-and-music-of-alice-mary-
smith-18391884-a-woman-composer-of-the-victorian-era-a-critical-
assessment-of-her-achievement-ian-grahamjones-4949864
https://ebookbell.com/product/european-peasants-and-their-markets-
essays-in-agrarian-economic-history-reprint-william-parker-7018998
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-story-of-kew-gardens-in-photographs-
kiri-rossjones-lynn-parker-11953572
https://ebookbell.com/product/holiday-loves-1st-edition-parker-
huntington-bb-easton-al-jacksonamo-jonesgiana-darlingkennedy-
ryansaffron-kentalex-wolfcrystal-kaswelltia-louisevanessa-
fewings-23512592
Discovering Diverse Content Through
Random Scribd Documents
[4] Ambassades de Noailles. Leyden, 1763.
[7] I am of course aware that the ambassador had previously sent his
brother François de Noailles to request the Queen to stand
godmother to his newly born son, but François only arrived at
Winchester from London on the day the Queen received news of the
arrival of the Prince off the Isle of Wight, which could not have been
earlier than the 19th, and was back in London again in time for the
child to be christened, with the Countess of Surrey as the Queen's
proxy, on the 22nd, which would certainly leave him no time to go to
Southampton to witness the landing. See "Ambassudes de Noailles,"
iii. 282.
[8] Mr. Prescott is the only historian writing in the English language
who refers to Spanish accounts at all, and his reference is confined to
a single mention of Cabrera's bald and stolid history and one or two
quotations from Sepulveda, who appears to have derived what little
information he gives from one of the narratives now before me.
Simon Renard's letters to the Emperor in the Granvelle papers are
naturally also referred to by most historians of the period in
question, but, important as they are from many points of view, they
only give a purely official and diplomatic account, and are Flemish
and imperial rather than Spanish and personal in their interest.
[9] Cabrera, "Relaciones," and Nicolas Antonio, "Biblioteca Nova."
[11] See letter from Lord Edmund Dudley to the Council, quoted in
Tytler, "Edward VI. and Mary."
[21] Don Pedro Enriquez was wrong here. One of the greatest of the
Spanish nobles, Count de Feria, had fallen madly in love with Jane
Dormer, one of the Queen's maids of honour, and soon afterwards
privately married her.
[22] Baoardo, quoted by Mr. Froude, says "he raised his hat to
nobody," but these narratives often mention his being uncovered.
[23] Narrator No. 6 says, "The hall, which is beautifully hung with
cloth of gold and silk, measures forty of my paces long and twenty
wide."
[26] The Spaniards had to be quartered in the halls of the City guilds.
For ages it had been considered vital in the interests both of England and
Spain that a close alliance should exist between the two countries, in order
to counterbalance the immemorial connection between Scotland and France;
and that the Flemish dominions of the house of Burgundy should under no
circumstances be allowed to fall under the sway of the French. It is easy to
understand that with France paramount over the North Sea ports and in
Scotland, England would never have been safe for a moment; whilst the
principal continental seat of English foreign trade would have been at the
mercy of England's secular foe. At the same time all central Europe would
have been cut off from its Atlantic seaboard, whilst the principal maritime
powers, Spain and Portugal, would have been excluded from all ports north
of Biscay, except on the sufferance of their jealous rival. This was the
tradition to which Philip had been born; inheriting as he did the dominions
both of Spain and the house of Burgundy, and almost at any cost he was
forced, as his forefathers had been, to cling to the connection between his
country and England. Henry VIII. had known full well that he might strain
the cord very tightly without breaking it when he flew into the face of all
Christendom, and contemptuously cast aside for an ignoble passion the aunt
of the Emperor, a daughter of the proudest royal house in Europe. Charles V.
dared not, and did not, break with England in consequence; for Henry had
taken care to draw close to Scotland and France, and the very hint of such a
combination was sufficient to render the Emperor all amiability.
For a time it looked as if the alliance had been rendered proof against all
attack by the marriage of Philip and Mary, and it is highly probable that it
would have been so if Renard's plan to marry Elizabeth to the Duke of
Savoy had been carried out; but here again circumstances were too strong
for persons. The marriage would have been useless unless Elizabeth were
first legitimised, and Mary could not legitimise her without bastardising
herself, which she obstinately refused to do, notwithstanding all the
entreaties of Philip and his friends. But Philip ostentatiously favoured his
young sister-in-law, in the hope that when she came to the throne he might
have some claim upon her gratitude, and induce her to maintain the
friendship which was so necessary for his interests. It was no question of
Catholic or Protestant yet. He would have supported her—as indeed he did
—however firm a Protestant she might be; for the next Catholic heir to the
crown, Mary Stuart, was practically a Frenchwoman, married to the heir of
the French throne, and with her as Queen of England and France, Spain and
the house of Burgundy would have been ruined.
Elizabeth knew as well as any one how vital it was for Philip to be
friendly with England; and during a long course of years she traded
unscrupulously upon her knowledge that she might assail, insult, plunder,
and make more or less veiled war upon him, and yet that he dared not
openly break with her whilst France was greedily eyeing his Flemish
harbours. From the first moment that Elizabeth's reform policy became
evident it was seen by Spanish statesmen that either the government of
England must be changed, so as to bring it back to the old cordial alliance,
or else Spain must seek new combinations of powers, in order to redress the
balance. For the first alternative to be successful promptness was necessary,
and the government of the Queen changed whilst the country was yet
unsettled and divided. Feria wrote from London to Philip only a day or two
after Mary's death that the country must be dealt with sword in hand rather
than by cajolery, unless it were to be allowed to slip through their hands; and
thenceforward for years all of Philip's agents, one after the other, pressed
upon their master the necessity of using force, either by aiding the Catholics
to revolt or by a direct attack on England. Angry, almost contemptuous,
references to the King's hesitancy and timidity are constantly occurring in
the letters of the various Spanish ambassadors in England, but beyond
occasional money aid to the English Catholics nothing could be obtained
from the King.
But if he thus deprecated open warfare he was at all times, after Mary
Stuart's French husband was dead, ready enough to subsidise plots to
assassinate or depose Elizabeth; and large sums were sent to England for
that purpose. In vain his agents continued to tell him how useless it was to
expect that the English Catholics would pull the chestnuts out of the fire for
him, unless they were assured of his armed support. But this assurance he
would not give. A marriage of his son Carlos with the widowed Mary Stuart,
simultaneously with a Catholic rising in England, was an expedient after his
own heart, but even here his timidity was so great that he would run no risk
of firing a shot in favour of a project in which he would have been the
principal gainer. He writes (June 15, 1563) to Bishop Quadra: "With regard
to the adherents that the Scots will have in England, and the increase of their
number if necessary, you will not interfere in any way further than you have
done, but let them do it all themselves, and gain what friends and sympathy
they can for their opinions amongst the Catholics and those upon whom they
depend. I say this because if anything should be discovered they should be
the persons to be blamed and no one in connection with us." He was told
plainly that the negotiations could not be carried on in this way, which
pledged everybody but himself, but it was all useless: his instructions were
firm and undeviating: under no circumstances was he to be drawn into war
with England.
It was the same again twelve years later when Drake's appalling atrocities
on the South American coasts had aroused the fury of all Spain; and England
was enriched by the plunder of sacred shrines and peaceful merchantmen.
English troops were in arms against him in Flanders, and public money had
been flowing over to the aid of the rebels with the thinnest possible disguise,
but still Philip clung obstinately to the English alliance, hoping against hope
that at last Elizabeth would become friendly with him. The most he would
do, as before, was to help the Irish Catholics in their revolt, in order to
hamper the English queen and prevent her from injuring him further.
Certainly in all these years he had never entertained for a moment the idea
of the subjugation of England; he only sought either by removing Elizabeth
or by diverting her attention to troubles at home to draw her country back
again to the old alliance and friendship.
Up to this period (1580) the principal reason, beyond Philip's natural love
of peace, which had caused him to follow his long-suffering policy was the
fear of finding himself opposed both to England and France. Catharine de
Medici was as facile as Elizabeth herself, and could generally, when it suited
her, patch up a reconciliation between Huguenots and Catholics and unite
them, for a short time at least, under a national banner. But in January, 1580,
an event happened which for the first time seemed to hold out hopes that he
might be able to revenge himself upon Elizabeth without the fear of France
before his eyes. Archbishop Beaton, Mary Stuart's ambassador in Paris,
secretly told Philip's ambassador there that he and the Duke of Guise had
prevailed upon the Queen of Scots to place herself, her son, and her realm
entirely in the hands and under the protection of the King of Spain, and
would send James VI. to Spain to be brought up and married there to Philip's
pleasure. This meant the detachment of the Guises from the French interest,
and Vargas, the Spanish ambassador, at once saw its importance. He sent off
a special courier to Philip, urging him now to action: "Such is the state of
things there," he says, "that if even so much as a cat moved the whole
edifice would crumble down in three days. If your Majesty had England and
Scotland attached to you, directly or indirectly, you might consider the
States of Flanders conquered, and ... you could lay down the law for the
whole world."
Guise's adhesion to Spain made all the difference, and Philip welcomed
the idea of deporting James Stuart to Spain as a preliminary measure. Mary
herself was in high hopes, and Beaton said she was determined to leave her
prison only as Queen of England. Her adherents, he asserted, were so
numerous in the country, that if they rose the matter would be easy without
assistance, "but with the aid of your Majesty it would soon be over." The
plan was shelved for a time in consequence of the death of Vargas; and
James' deportation became unnecessary on the fall of Protestant Morton, and
the accession to power of D'Aubigny, Earl of Lennox, who had already sent
Fernihurst to Spain to assure Philip of his devotion; but in April of the
following year Mary Stuart opened negotiations with Tassis, the new
Spanish ambassador in Paris. "Affairs," she assured him, through Beaton,
"were never better disposed in Scotland, than now to return to their ancient
condition, so that English affairs could be dealt with subsequently." The
King, her son, she said, was quite determined to return to the Catholic
religion, and inclined to an open rupture with the Queen of England.
Philip was on the Portuguese frontier at the time, and affairs in Madrid
were being managed by the aged Cardinal de Granvelle, who sent to the
King notes and recommendations on all letters received.
Thus far, then, the aims of Spain were legitimate and honest under the
circumstances; and Philip had no avowed intention, or thought, of the
conquest of England for himself. We shall see how he was gradually forced
by circumstances and the jealousy between the English and Scottish
Catholics to adopt a different attitude.
From that time a change was apparent in Philip's policy. When he heard
of the Raid of Ruthven and the flight of Lennox he saw that English
Protestant intrigue had conquered, and that the Scottish-Catholic enterprise
was at an end for a time. Guise was to be flattered and conciliated, but it is
clear that henceforward Philip wished to confine his (Guise's) attention to
France. He was told how dangerous it would be for him to leave France with
his enemies, the Huguenots, in possession, and was emphatically assured of
Spanish support in his own ambitious plans at home.
Guise thereupon came to the Spaniards in May, 1583, with a fresh plan.
He had decided, he said, to begin with the English Catholics. Elizabeth was
first to be murdered and the country raised, whilst he landed on the coast,
but Philip and the Pope must provide 100,000 crowns to pay for it. His
plans, as usual, however, were vague and incomplete, and the English
Catholics, as well as Philip, looked coldly upon them. Father Allen and the
English exiles were in deadly earnest, "and thought all this talk and intricacy
were mere buckler-play." Mendoza in Paris reports to Philip that "they
suspected a tendency on the part of the Scots to claim a controlling influence
in the new empire, and as the Scots are naturally inclined to the French, they
would rather the affair were carried through with but few Spaniards, whilst
the English hate this idea, as their country is the principal one ... and they
think it should not lose its predominance."
The English Catholics had a plan of their own which they urged upon
Philip. The English North Country was to be raised simultaneously with the
landing of a Spanish force in Yorkshire, accompanied by the Earl of
Westmoreland, Lord Dacre, and other nobles, with Allen as Nuncio and
Bishop of Durham, and some of the extreme Catholic party, even in
Scotland, distrusting the French, favoured some such plan as this under
purely Spanish auspices.
Guise appears finally to have adopted a combination of this plan and his
own. The Spanish forces were to land at Fouldrey, Dalton-in-Furness,
Lancashire, whilst the English North Country was to be raised, and the
Catholic Scots on the border were to co-operate with the Spaniards. Guise at
the same time was to land in the south of England with about 5,000 men.
James VI., who had thrown himself into Falkland and had assumed the reins
of government, was in complete accord with Guise about it, but the latter, as
usual, was for pushing matters on far too rapidly to please Philip. He (Guise)
took upon himself to send a priest named Melino to the Pope to ask him to
furnish some funds for the expedition and to explain the whole of the
particulars, and this deeply offended the King of Spain, who had no idea of
having matters arranged over his head by such a bungler as Guise. The latter
also sent Charles Paget in disguise to England in August, 1583, to inquire as
to the amount of support he might expect when he landed on the south coast,
and when Philip in due course saw the instructions taken by Paget, it became
clear to him that he must somehow eliminate Guise from the project. On the
margin of the instructions Philip scribbled sarcastic remarks as to the futility
of Guise's projecting a landing and sending full particulars of his plans to the
Pope before he had ascertained what support he could depend upon when he
did land. What opened Philip's eyes more than anything else was that the
English "were to be assured on the faith and honour of Guise that the
enterprise is being undertaken with no other object or intention than to re-
establish the Catholic religion in England and to place the Queen of
Scotland peacefully on the throne of England, which rightly belongs to her.
When this is effected the foreigners will immediately retire from the
country, and if any one attempts to frustrate this intention Guise promises
that he and his forces will join the people of the country to compel the
foreigners to withdraw."
Well might Philip underline this and scatter notes of exclamation around
it, for it marked the parting of the ways, and showed that Guise was more
anxious for his family aggrandisement and personal ambition in placing his
kin upon the English throne than to serve the interests of Spain by securing a
close union between the two countries to the exclusion of France, which was
Philip's main object.
Guise was therefore told that he must not be precipitate, and the matter
was kept in suspense; but from that moment Philip decided to undertake the
matter alone. Allen and the English Catholics had never ceased to urge upon
him that his troops should be landed first in England, and not in Scotland;
and this now obviously suited Philip best, as he was growing more and more
doubtful about James' religious sincerity. Another fact must have also
influenced him greatly in the same direction. His great admiral, Santa Cruz,
had just brilliantly routed the French mercenary fleet in the service of the
Portuguese pretender at the Azores, and in the flush of victory had written to
Philip begging to be allowed to direct his conquering fleet against England.
"Do not miss the opportunity, sire," he wrote, "and believe me I have the
will to make you king of that country and others besides." The grand old
sailor made light of the difficulties, and besought the King to let him go and
conquer England in the name of God and Spain. But Philip was not ready
for that yet, and the idea was only now being forced by events into his slow
mind that perhaps he might be obliged, after all, to claim England for his
own, since the English Catholics were for ever saying they wanted no
French or Scotsmen; and not a single English pretender was otherwise than
Protestant. So Santa Cruz was told that the King would consider the matter,
and in the meanwhile provide for eventualities by ordering large supplies of
biscuits, and by gradually sending men to Flanders. At the same time he
wrote to his ambassador in Paris, telling him in confidence that he intended
in due time to invade England from Flanders, but no one was to learn this
until the preparations had advanced too far to be concealed; "and even then
they (the French) must be told in such terms as may not make them suspect
an intention of excluding the French from the enterprise."
But what is of more importance still, Philip gave directions in the same
letter to Tassis in November, 1583, that his own claim to the English crown
as a descendant of Edward III. should be cautiously broached. If England
was to remain in close alliance with Spain, it is difficult to see what other
course Philip could have taken. James as a successor to his mother was now
out of the question, so far as Spanish interests were concerned, for he was
playing false all round. No sooner did the Scots Catholics gain the upper
hand than he intrigued with Elizabeth and the Protestants for their
overthrow, and immediately the English and Protestant faction became
paramount he wrote beseeching letters for aid to Guise and the Pope. All
this, of course, Philip knew, for he knew everything, and although he
intended to put Mary Stuart on the throne, from this time he was determined
that her son should not succeed her.
The discovery of the Throgmorton plot and Guise's wild plans in
connection therewith threw the whole project into the background for a time,
and confirmed stealthy Philip in the idea that in future he must manage
matters himself. When Tassis, his ambassador in Paris, was withdrawn from
his post, in the spring of 1584, he wrote an important memorandum to his
master setting forth at length the arguments on both sides for and against a
landing in England or Scotland, by which it is clear that the English and
Scottish Catholic factions in France were now bitterly at issue on the
subject. As the English plan had gained ground, James had once more
considered it advisable to feign a desire to become a Catholic; and Guise
had again urged the adoption of the plan of a landing in Scotland, with the
invasion of England over the Scots border, James himself being the
figurehead. Tassis says that such is the jealousy of the Scots in England that
if an army crossed the Border the English Catholics themselves might resist
it. "The English," he says, "would not like to be dominated by Scotsmen,
and if the crown of Scotland is to be joined to theirs, they still wish to be
cocks-of-the-walk, as their kingdom is the larger and more important one.
On the other hand the Scots may be unduly inflated with the opposite idea,
so that imperfections may exist on both sides." As Mary Stuart had drawn
closer to Spain she had grown distrustful of Beaton and Tassis, whom she
considered too much wedded to French ideas; but withal Tassis in this
document very emphatically leans to the English view, which he knew was
that now held by his master. The full plan for a great armada was evidently
slowly germinating in Philip's mind, but the vast expense had first to be
provided for. When Guise's envoy, Melino, had gone on his meddling
mission to the Pope his Holiness had offered to subsidise the expedition to a
moderate amount, and in answer to the second appeal from James VI.
himself he had said that he would stand by his previous promise. But this
did not suit Philip, and he let the Pope know promptly that he was willing to
undertake the great task for the glory of God and the advance of the Church,
but that the Pope must subscribe very largely indeed, "and must find ways
and means through his holy zeal to do much more than has yet been
imagined." He was also warned that Guise ought not to be allowed to leave
France, where he might serve the Catholic cause so much more effectively
than elsewhere. And so Guise and the Scotsmen are pushed further and
further into the background, Philip's aim being evidently to raise civil
commotion in France, which was always easy enough to do, and so to
paralyse Henry III. and the Huguenots from helping Elizabeth, whilst Guise
would be powerless to promote the interest in England of his kinsman
James.
When it became apparent that the Pope was to have a large share in the
business the intrigue was transferred from Paris to Rome. Sixtus himself was
wise, frugal, and moderate, and had no great desire to serve Philip's political
aims, but only to signalise his own pontificate by the restoration of England
to the Church; but he was surrounded by cardinals who represented the
different interests. Medici, D'Este, Gonzaga, Rusticucci, Santorio, and others
represented the French view, which was in favour of an arrangement with
Elizabeth and James, and desired to exclude Spanish influence from
England. Sanzio watched Guise's interests, whilst the Secretary of State
Caraffa, Sirleto, Como, Allen, and the Spanish ambassador, Olivares,
craftily forwarded Philip's wishes, the Pope himself being carefully kept in
the dark as to the ultimate object in view. The cause of religion was invoked
all through as being Philip's only motive; inconvenient points were left
indefinite, with the certainty that Caraffa would interpret them favourably to
Spanish designs; and by the most extraordinary cajolery the Pope was
induced to promise a million gold crowns to the enterprise. He was not
brought to this without much haggling and misgiving on his part, and was
very cautiously treated with regard to Philip's intention to claim the English
crown. "His Holiness," writes Olivares, "is quite convinced that your
Majesty is not thinking of the crown of England for yourself, and told
Cardinal D'Este so. I did not say anything to the contrary. He is very far
from thinking your Majesty has any such views, and when the matter is
broached to him he will be much surprised. However deeply he is pledged to
abide by your Majesty's opinion, I quite expect he will raise some
difficulty." Philip's constant orders were that the Pope should be plied with
arguments as to the inadvisibility of the heretic James being allowed to
succeed, and the need for choosing some good Catholic to succeed Mary.
The person that Philip had decided to make sovereign of England was his
favourite daughter, Isabel Clara Eugenia, but this was not to be mentioned to
the Pope. "But if at any time the Pope moved by his zeal should talk about
any other successor, you will remind him, before he gets wedded to his new
idea, that he is pledged to agree to my choice in the matter."
In the meanwhile Allen, Persons, and the other English Catholics, were
ceaseless in their steady propagation of the idea of Philip's own right to the
crown, in consequence of the heresy of James, and the same view was
forced upon Mary Stuart by Mendoza and her English confidants in Paris,
all of whom were pensioners of Spain. At length Mary was convinced, and
wrote to Mendoza at the end of June, 1586, saying she had disinherited her
son in favour of Philip.
The full plan of the Armada had now assumed definite form. The King
was in possession of Santa Cruz's marvellously complete estimate of cost
and requirements of all sorts—a perfect monument of technical knowledge
and forethought; the Pope was pledged to find about a third of the necessary
funds, and to leave Philip a free hand with regard to the English succession
and the time for the carrying out of the enterprise; whilst Philip's position
with regard to his claim to the English crown was regularised by Mary's will
in his favour.
Guise, Beaton, and the Scots had thus been routed all along the line, but
it was not to be supposed that they would accept their defeat without a
struggle. Their next move was within an ace of being successful, and nearly
changed the whole plan of the Armada. In July, 1586, Guise wrote to
Mendoza that a plan he had long been concocting had at last been brought to
a head, and Beaton was commissioned to tell Mendoza what the scheme
was. A Scottish gentleman named Robert Bruce had been sent to France
with three blank sheets, signed respectively by Lords Huntly, Morton, and
Claude Hamilton, which Guise was to fill up over the signatures with letters
to Philip, appealing to him to aid the Scots Catholics. They asked for 6,000
foreign troops for one year and 150,000 crowns to equip their own men, and
in return promised to restore Catholicism, release James and his mother,
compel the former to become a Catholic, and, most tempting of all, to
deliver to Philip one or two good ports near the English Border to be used
against the Queen of England. Bruce went to Madrid to lay the Scots' appeal
before the King, but when he arrived the failure of the Babington plot and
the collapse of the Catholic party in England was known to Philip, and he
had lost hope of effecting the "enterprise" except with overwhelming forces
of his own. He did not wish, moreover, for Guise's interference, and was
coolly sympathetic and no more. And yet, in the face of Santa Cruz's advice
that he should secure some ports of refuge for the Armada in the North Sea,
the offer of the Scots lords to give him two good Scotch harbours was one
not to be lightly refused, so whilst he sent Bruce back with vague promises,
he instructed Parma and Mendoza to report fully on the scheme. Parma was
cold and irresponsive. He would give no decided opinion until he knew what
Philip's intentions were. He was apparently jealous that he was not taken
fully into his uncle's confidence, and perhaps angry that his son's claims to
the English crown, which were better than those of Philip and his daughter,
were being ignored. But Mendoza, an old soldier, the last pupil of Alba, as
he called himself, was indignant at Parma's doubts, and wrote to Philip an
extremely able paper strongly advising the invasion of England through
Scotland, instead of risking everything in a vast fleet, to which one disaster
would cripple Spain for ever. In prophetic words he foretold the possibility
of the very catastrophe which subsequently happened, and prayed Philip, ere
it was too late, to close with the Scots lords' offer. But Philip and Parma
were slow and wanted all sorts of assurances; so Bruce was kept in France
and Flanders for many months, whilst his principals lost hope and heart. At
last, when they were on the point of going over to the Protestant side, on a
promise of toleration for their religion, Bruce was tardily sent back with
10,000 crowns to freight a number of small boats at Leith to send over to
Dunkirk for Parma's troops, and the 150,000 crowns demanded by the lords
were promised when they rose.
During all this time the juggle in Rome was going on. Gradually Sixtus
was familiarised with the idea that Philip could not go to war for the sake of
putting heretic James on the throne; then Allen took care that he saw the
genealogical tree showing Philip's claim, and at last, in the summer of 1587,
it was cautiously hinted to him that, though Philip would not add England to
his dominions, he might perhaps appoint his daughter to the throne. Sanzio,
Mendovi and the French cardinals were straining every nerve to persuade
the Pope that the King of Scots might be converted, and the Capuchin monk
Bishop of Dunblane, amongst others, went to Scotland for the purpose of
forwarding this view.
The result of Bruce's appeal at Madrid was concealed from Guise, but of
course he learnt it indirectly, and was greatly indignant at his exclusion from
a project of which he was the originator. It was really no secret, however, for
in July, 1587, Father Creighton, sent by Guise, arrived in Rome full of it; he,
like other Scotsmen, being in favour of James' conversion and his
acceptance by Spain as King of England. But Allen, Persons, and the rest of
them, soon silenced Creighton, with threats, cajolery, and money.
When Catharine de Medici got wind of the business she seems to have
thought it a good opportunity for getting rid of Guise and checkmating
Philip at the same time, and urged him (Guise) to go himself to aid his
kinsman James to the crown, in which case she would largely subsidise him;
and Guise himself was so incensed at the way Philip had treated him that he
threatened to divulge the whole of Bruce's plot to James, and very probably
did so. Elizabeth, too, sent young Gary to warn James of what was going on,
so that when Bruce arrived in Scotland the King was fully prepared for him;
and although he appeared to acquiesce in the hint from Bruce that the
Spaniards would aid him to avenge his mother, he was now surrounded by
ministers favourable to the Protestant interest, who saw that James had more
to hope for from Elizabeth than from Philip, and the matter was deferred
indefinitely. It was late in autumn when Bruce arrived in Scotland, too late
in the season to freight ships, and he suggested that in the following summer
ships for the transport of Parma's 6,000 men to Leith should be freighted in
Flanders. This was impossible—in fact, the long delay whilst Philip and
Parma were hesitating had ruined the project, which was now public and
consequently impracticable, though Bruce and the Scottish lords continued
to clamour for Spanish men and money until the Armada appeared. And so
again Philip's want of promptness lost this chance, which might have saved
the Armada.
By this time, late in the year 1587, the final plan of the Armada had been
settled. Parma had received his full instructions from Philip some months
before; all Spain and Catholic Christendom were ringing with preparations
for the fray, and the great fleet—or what Drake had left intact of it on his
summer trip to Cadiz—was mustering at Lisbon under gallant old Santa
Cruz, who was already dying broken-hearted at the neglect of his wise
precautions, at the confusion, waste, and ineptitude which foreboded the
crowning disaster.
With the subsequent mishaps and catastrophe this study is not concerned.
My object has been to show how circumstances drove Philip to adopt the
course he did, both with regard to the invasion itself and his claim to the
English crown; and to demonstrate that the ostensible prime object of the
Armada, the conversion of England to Catholicism, although undoubtedly
desired by Philip, was mainly used as a means to his real end—namely, a
close political alliance with England, without which Spain was inevitably
doomed to the impotence which eventually fell upon her.
Tailpiece
It is a curious reflection that whilst all the serious acts and surroundings
of civilised life have been rendered amenable to the law, whilst the very
instincts inherent in the nature of mankind have been dominated and
regulated by authority, utter failure has attended the persistent efforts of
rulers to cope with the trivial follies of fashion, or to limit the vanity and
extravagance of personal adornment. For long ages men, and particularly
women, have insisted upon making themselves absurd and uncomfortable, at
great cost and in an infinite variety of ways, in obedience to dictates or
impulses springing from nobody knows where, and have only consented to
forego each succeeding caprice when the taste for it has worn itself out and
has given place to another, perhaps still more preposterous than its
predecessor.
It has been from no fault of the rulers that they have been beaten in their
fight with fashion, for they have tried their hardest for centuries. Our
Plantagenet and Tudor sovereigns made many attempts to regulate the dress
and adornment of their subjects, but the motive which mainly prompted
them was the desire to differentiate the classes and prevent the humbler
citizens from emulating, in appearance at least, their social superiors. In a
state of society which depended upon the subjection of the majority by the
privileged classes, this motive was perfectly reasonable; as was also the
alternative one of protecting a particular national industry, which, in Tudor
times especially, often furnished a reason for the imposition of sumptuary
enactments; but both of these motives, from their very nature, were
necessarily more or less ephemeral and artificial, because, on the one hand,
the continual social development, the growing wealth of the traders and the
emancipation of the labourers made the classes interdependent; and, on the
other, the extended seaboard of England and the maritime enterprise of the
inhabitants made the protection of a particular industry by prohibiting
foreign competition impossible for any great length of time. The attempted
interference, therefore, of English sovereigns with the dress of their lieges
was intermittent and spasmodic, and was, at a comparatively early period,
admitted to be useless.
Such, however, from various reasons was not the case in Spain. There the
fight against finery was kept up persistently for nearly six centuries, and
hardly a decade passed during that time without one or more petty and
ridiculous attempts being made to interfere with the dress, food, personal
habits, and surroundings of the people. The ostensible motives were usually
different from those which operated in England. The separation of the
classes has never been so complete in Spain as elsewhere in Europe, owing
to the fact that from a very early period in the history of the country all
Christians were banded together and dependent upon one another for
protection against the common enemy, the infidel. Manual industry,
moreover, was never a strong point with Spanish Christians, and the main
reason for the various attempts to exclude foreign goods was the dread that
Spanish gold would be sent out to pay for them. Nothing is more striking,
indeed, than the absolutely murderous effect upon Spanish industry exerted
by most of the paternal attempts at interference with trade, but political
economy was even more of a dead letter amongst that nation of warriors
than with our own ancestors. The earliest object of the great mass of
sumptuary laws in Spain was to restrict the dreaded taste for luxury and
splendour which was felt to be a characteristic of the hated Moor, who had
been conquered bit by bit by people who were content to live roughly, feed
frugally, and dress plainly. But with victory came wealth, with peace came
intermixture, and the subtle, refined, Oriental blood, with its love of pomp
and brilliancy, gradually permeated the rough Gothic-Iberians, until its
manifestations alarmed rulers whose power still largely depended upon the
self-sacrificing frugality and hardy endurance of their subjects. Thus it was
that the attempt was made to keep people frugal and homely whilst they
were growing rich, and the tendency continued during all the centuries that
the struggle against Spanish luxury went on, although during the last three
centuries of the period the original motive had disappeared, and the usual
excuse for the interference of the King with the dress of his subjects was the
desire to prevent them from spending so much money upon themselves, in
order that they might spend more upon him.
But, whatever the motives may have been, the fight against extravagance
was carried on as persistently as fruitlessly until quite recent times, and there
exists a mass of information with regard to the dress and manners of the
people in the Spanish sumptuary enactments unequalled elsewhere. The
decrees usually took the form of a representation from the Cortes to the
sovereign, setting forth in a preamble the particular abuses to be remedied,
and then proposing a remedy which the sovereign usually confirmed by
what was called his "pragmatic sanction," and the decree was then
proclaimed and had the force of law. A large number of these decrees or
"pragmatics" of the highest interest will be found in the British Museum
manuscripts (MSS. Add. 9933 and 9934), and many more are set forth in
Sempere's "Historia de las leyes suntuarias" (Madrid, 1788), whilst the
familiar and festive traditions of old Madrid teem with quaint stories of
ingenious evasions and jovial defiance of the laws under the very noses of
the sable-clad Acaldes and Alguaciles, whose grave and solemn duty it was
to clip lovelocks and measure frills and furbelows.
The first vicious extravagance which seizes upon a hardy, simple people
who find themselves safe after a period of struggle is naturally that of
gluttony; and the earliest sumptuary decrees of the Castilian kings were
directed against this particular excess.
His kinsman of Castile was in worse case, for his dominions were more
open to the Moor. Saint Ferdinand conquered the splendid Moorish city of
Seville in 1248, where he died four years later, leaving his son, Alonso the
Wise, to succeed him as King of Castile. Oriental luxury surrounded the
frugal Castilians on all hands. The wealth of plundered cities, the spoils of
Moslem palaces were to be had for the grasping, so that it was natural that
extravagance in attire and eating should soon threaten to soften the Christian
conquerors dwelling in the midst of the gentler, vanquished Moor. Alonso
the Wise, in 1256, therefore issued in Seville his first great sumptuary
enactment. By it no saddles were allowed to be covered or trimmed with
plush. No gold or silver tinsel was to adorn them, excepting as a border of
three inches wide, the saddle itself being of uncovered leather. Gold and
silver might be used on caps, girdles, quilted doublets, saddle-cloths or
table-covers, but not for draping shields or cuirasses. No jingling bells were
to be used as trimmings, except on the saddle-cloths at the cane-throwing
tourneys, but even then no device was to be embroidered on the cloths.
Bosses upon the shields were not to be allowed, but the latter might be
adorned with a painted or gilded-copper device. No milled cloth was to be
worn, nor were the garments to be cut and pinked in fanciful shapes, or
trimmed with ribbons or silk cords; the penalty for infringing any of these
regulations being the loss of one or both thumbs by the offender, which of
course meant his disgrace and ruin in the career of arms. Women were
allowed a little more latitude, but not much. They might wear ermine and
otter fur to any extent, but they were forbidden to adorn their girdles with
beads or seed-pearls, or to border their kirtles or wimples with gold or silver
thread, or to wear them of any other colour than white.
With regard to eating, Alonso the Wise held similar notions to those of
his neighbour Don Jaime, and ordered that his lieges should not have upon
their tables more than two dishes of meat and one of bought game, and on
fast days not more than two kinds of fish. As if recognising the difficulty of
enforcing this, the King solemnly undertook to comply with his own
regulations. Great extravagance had arisen in wedding feasts, which were
said (as in Oriental countries they do to-day) to often ruin the contracting
families, and Alonso made strict rules to limit the excess in this direction.
No presents of breeches were to be given, and the entire cost of a wedding
outfit was not to exceed 60 maravedis, whilst not more than five men and as
many women might be invited to the wedding banquet by each of the
contracting parties. The money spent upon marriage rejoicings, indeed, had
become so great that Alonso made this reform a great point in his decree,
and provided against evasion by strictly limiting the time during which the
feast might continue and wedding presents be given. Moors were said to be
dressing like Christians, and this was rigidly forbidden. They were to wear
no red or green clothes, and no white or gold shoes, and their hair was to be
parted plainly in the middle of the head, with no topknot, whilst they were
enjoined to wear their full beard, which made the distinction between them
and the shaven-chinned Christians the more marked. The penalties imposed
for disobeying this decree of 1256 were savage in the extreme, varying from
loss of a thumb and a fine for the first offence, to death for the third; but
savage as they were, they can hardly have been effectual, except perhaps in
Seville, for only two years later, in 1258, Alonso came out with a perfect
code of conduct for his subjects, far too minute to even summarise here, but
of which some specimens may be given, as they served as a model for
subsequent decrees for many years afterwards. Alonso had apparently got
tired of his self-denying ordinance and says the King may eat and dress as
he pleases, but agrees to limit his daily table expenditure to 150 maravedis a
day, which in spending power would represent about £40 at the present time
at least. But he orders his "ricoshomes," ruling men, to eat more sparingly
and to spend less money. None of the members of the royal household,
squires, scribes, falconers, or porters, except the head of each department,
were allowed to wear white fur or trimmings, or to use gilt or plated saddles
or spurs. They were forbidden to indulge in breeches of scarlet cloth, gilt
shoes, and hats of gold or silver tissue. Priests, it appears, had been reducing
the size of their tonsures and ruffling in fine colours, so as to be
undistinguishable from laymen, and they are sternly ordered to have their
tonsures the full size of their heads, gird themselves with a rope, and eschew
red, green, and pink garments. The old regulations about eating were
repeated with the addition of one plate of meat for supper, and the
prohibition of fish on meat days. No man, however rich, was to buy more
than four suits of clothes in a year, and no ermine, silk, gold or silver tissue,
no slashes, trimmings, or pinked cloth might be worn by men. Two fur
mantles in a year, and one rain-cape in two years was the limit of
extravagance allowed to a man in this direction; and the King alone was to
wear a red rain-cape. Lawn and silk for outer garments were confined to
royalty, but the "ricoshomes" might employ them as linings. No crystal or
silver buttons were to be allowed, nor was shaving or other signs of
mourning permitted, except to vassals who had lost their overlord and to
widows. Jews and Moors are cruelly treated in this decree, and their
offences and those of the poorer classes are to be punished by torture or
death, whilst those of the "ricoshomes" are left to the King's discretion.
Ermine, vair, and otter furs would appear to have been amongst the principal
articles of luxury, as the wearing of them is very strictly regulated, and white
furs seem to come next in estimation after them.
For ninety years these laws of Alonso the Wise were repeated and
reimposed with slight variations, but apparently ineffectually; since in 1348
the Cortes of Alcalá made a presentment to Alonso XI. of Castile bewailing
the luxury and extravagance of the age, and proposing a new code of
sumptuary rules, which in due course the King confirmed. These rules are
very interesting because they demonstrate the great strides which had been
made in luxury, refinement, and civilisation since the issue of the decrees of
Alonso the Wise nearly a century before. No gold ornaments, no ermine or
grebe-neck trimmings, no seed-pearl embroidery, gold or silver buttons or
wire, and no enamels were to be worn except by nobles. No gold tissue or
silk was allowed except for linings, and no man below the rank of a knight
might wear vair fur or gilt shoes. Even the princes of the blood were strictly
limited in their dress, and were ordered to use tapestry cloth or silk, but
without gold or trimming of any sort. The Spartan wedding regulations of
Alonso the Wise had now become obsolete with the advance of wealth, but
the new rules, although wider, were to be enforced with equal or greater
severity. No gentleman was to give his bride within four months after
marriage more than three suits of clothes, one of which might be of gold
tissue, and one embroidered with seed-pearls to the value of 4,000
maravedis, an enormous sum when we consider that ninety years before 150
maravedis were the limit of the monarch's daily expenditure, and that at this
date, 1348, the value of a sheep was only eight maravedis. The bride's
trousseau is regulated down to the smallest details, and the penalty for
exceeding them is the loss of one-quarter of his land by the too-generous
gentleman who does so. The decree sets forth that some women are wearing
trains, "which are both costly and useless," but in future they are to be
confined to those ladies who are travelling in a litter—a privilege limited to
nobles. All other women are to wear pelisses without trains, just reaching the
ground, "or at least not to drag more than two inches upon it." Ladies who
broke this rule were to be fined 500 maravedis. Great stress is again laid
upon the limitation of extravagance in wedding feasts, and burials, but the
cost still allowed shows to what an excess luxury had been carried. The
bride's wedding clothes might cost 4,000 maravedis and the groom's outfit
2,000; and thirty-two people were now allowed at the wedding feast. Much
more latitude was permitted in the use of seed-pearls, gold, and silver, to
people above the rank of knights, but the principal point to be noted in these
decrees of Alonso XI. is the incidence of the penalty. In the decrees of
Alonso the Wise, as has been shown, the most savage penalties were
imposed upon the poorer classes, whilst the punishment of the nobles was
left to the King's discretion. But much more even justice is dealt out by
Alonso XI. The nobles who break the law are to lose one-quarter of their
land, the knights one-third, the citizens 500 maravedis, whilst the poorer
classes for slight offences against the sumptuary rules are condemned to lose
the offending garment and its cost in money.
In 1384 Peter the Cruel's nephew, John I. of Castile, was well beaten by
the Portuguese at the battle of Aljubarrota, and marked his sorrow by issuing
a decree prohibiting the use in any form of dress of silk, gold, silver, seed-
pearls, precious stones, or ornaments of any kind, and everybody was
ordered to don a simple mourning garb. When, four years after this, John of
Gaunt's daughter Catharine came to marry the heir to the crown of Castile,
she brought something else with her besides the wide, pointed coif which
Spanish widows wore for the next three hundred years. Part of her dower
consisted of great herds of merino sheep, which crossed and thrived so well
in Spain that the coarse duffel, which had been the only native cloth, gave
place in a few years to beautiful fine woollen textures which could vie with
those of England and Flanders.
By the time Isabel the Catholic had died the Spanish silk industry was
nearly at an end, and the skittish young Bearnaise princess, Germaine de
Foix, who succeeded her as old Fernando's wife, came too late to do it much
good. It is true she snapped her slender fingers and threw up her pretty chin
at the straitlaced sumptuary laws, and surrounded herself with silks and
velvets, gold brocade and gems, wherever she went; but unfortunately they
mostly came from the looms and workshops of Southern France, and gave
no work to Spanish hands. Money, of course, had to be sent out of Spain to
pay for the finery, and in 1515 the Cortes of Burgos complained of this to
Jane the Mad, Isabel's nominal successor, who thereupon issued a decree
entirely forbidding brocades and gold or silver embroidery and trimmings to
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.
ebookbell.com