0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views6 pages

ORDER of High Court Madras On HCP 229 of 2025

The High Court of Madras heard a Habeas Corpus Petition filed by Vijayapriya seeking custody of her 2½-year-old daughter from her estranged husband, P. Sivapragasam. The court ordered that the child's interim custody be granted to the mother while allowing the father visitation rights every 15 days. The court also directed both parties to approach a Civil Court for a final custody decision, emphasizing that the interim custody should not influence the court's future rulings.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views6 pages

ORDER of High Court Madras On HCP 229 of 2025

The High Court of Madras heard a Habeas Corpus Petition filed by Vijayapriya seeking custody of her 2½-year-old daughter from her estranged husband, P. Sivapragasam. The court ordered that the child's interim custody be granted to the mother while allowing the father visitation rights every 15 days. The court also directed both parties to approach a Civil Court for a final custody decision, emphasizing that the interim custody should not influence the court's future rulings.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

H.C.P.No.

229 of 2 025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.03.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH


AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

H.C.P.No.229 of 2025

Vijayapriya ...Petitioner

Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police,


Superintendent of Police Office,
Villupuram District.

2. State rep. by Inspector of Police,


All Women Police Station,
Tindivanam, Villupuram District.

3. P.Sivapragasam ...Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus and direct the respondents to produce the
petitioner's minor daughter Sri Vaitheeswari D/o.Vijayapriya aged about 2½
years from the custody of the 3 rd respondent before this Court and handover to
the petitioner.

For Petitioners : Mr.V.Navaneethakrishnan


For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, APP
assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John
For R3 : Mr.B.Balavijayan

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/
judis
1/6
H.C.P.No.229 of 2 025

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH,J.)

The petitioner herein is the wife of the 3 rd respondent to whom a 2½

years old minor daughter was born. Owing to an estranged relationship, the

petitioner and the 3rd respondent are living separately. Alleging that the 3 rd

respondent had forcibly sent the petitioner out of the matrimonial house and

retained the minor daughter with him, she has filed the present Habeas Corpus

Petition seeking for securing her minor daughter and handover its custody to

her.

2. When the matter came up for hearing on 03.03.2025, we had taken into

consideration that the petitioner's minor daughter was at a tender age of 2½

years and therefore, her normal custody should be only with her mother and

accordingly directed the 3rd respondent to handover the custody of the minor

daughter to the petitioner. Through the same order, we had also referred the

parties to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to the High Court of

Madras, Chennai, on 05.03.2025.

3. Today, when the matter was called, both the parties had reported that

the conciliation proceedings had ended in failure. It was also mutually


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/
judis
2/6
H.C.P.No.229 of 2 025

submitted that the minor child is now under the care and protection of the

petitioner.

4. Since both the petitioner and the 3 rd respondent had not come to a

mutual understanding with regard to their matrimonial difference, as well as the

custody of their minor daughter, it would be appropriate to relegate the parties

to approach the competent Civil Court of law, seeking for custody of their

minor daughter. However, since the minor child is aged only about 2½ years, it

would be conducive that the interim custody of the minor child is retained by

the petitioner/mother and accordingly, we order so.

5. The 3rd respondent/father is at liberty to visit his minor daughter once

in 15 days for about one hour, at the residence of the petitioner. During such

visits, the petitioner shall not create any disturbance or other inconvenience to

the 3rd respondent and shall ensure that the 3rd respondent has full access to the

child. However, the 3rd respondent shall not take the child out of the petitioner's

house during his visits.

6. In case any of the parties approach the appropriate Family Court/Civil

Court seeking for custody of child, the concerned Court shall deal the petition

s tr ict ly o on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in


https://www.mh c .t n .g o v .i n /jud is

3/6
accordance with law,

4/6
H.C.P.No.229 of 2 025

without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order or grant

of interim custody by this Court.

7. With the above directions, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands disposed

of.

(M.S.R.,J.) (N.S.,J.)
28.03.2025
Index:Yes/No
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
Speaking order/Non-speaking order
hvk

To

1. The Superintendent of Police,


Superintendent of Police Office,
Villupuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police,


All Women Police Station,
Tindivanam, Villupuram District.

3. The Public Prosecutor,


High Court of Madras, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/
judis
5/6
H.C.P.No.229 of 2 025

M.S.RAMESH,J.
AND
N.SENTHILKUMAR,J.

hvk

H.C.P.No.229 of 2025

28.03.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/
judis
6/6

You might also like