CSR and Business Ethics
CSR and Business Ethics
Written by
STUDENTS:
➢ HANNEBICQ Alice
➢ TALOM KAMDJO Dilane
➢ LOBE Franck Bryan Noé
Supervised By
Father Michael TEKE
i
TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Howard R. Bowen ......................................................................................................2
Figure 2: Caroll's CSR pyramid .................................................................................................3
Figure 3: What is business ethics? ..............................................................................................8
Figure 4: Importance of business ethics..................................................................................... 13
Figure 5: Business ethics vs social responsibility........................................................................ 15
Figure 6: Water reservoirs installed by Coca-Cola ...................................................................... 17
Figure 7: Coca-Cola's equipment ............................................................................................. 18
Figure 8: Parivartan Challenge launched by Coca-Cola ............................................................... 20
ii
Introduction
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and business ethics have become fundamental concepts
in the modern corporate world. These notions involve practices aimed at ensuring a balance
between economic development, social commitment, and environmental protection.
CSR refers to the voluntary commitment of companies to integrate social and environmental
concerns into their activities and interactions with stakeholders. Business ethics, on the other
hand, encompass the principles and values that guide decision-making and business conduct
within an organization.
This presentation will cover CSR and Business Ethics, their definitions, key components,
impacts, and implementation. It will also explore their connection, real-world case studies, and
key lessons on responsible business conduct.
1
Chapter 1: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
I. Etymological Origin
The concept of CSR has evolved over time. The term "responsibility" originates from the Latin
word responsum, meaning "to respond" or "to be accountable." The modern notion of Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR) began to take shape in the mid-20th century. One of the earliest
formal discussions on CSR was introduced by Howard R. Bowen in his seminal work Social
Responsibilities of the Businessman (1953), where he argued that businesses have obligations
to society beyond profit-making. The 1960s and 1970s saw further developments with scholars
like Keith Davis and Archie Carroll refining the concept, leading to Carroll’s famous CSR
pyramid in 1991, which categorized corporate responsibilities into economic, legal, ethical, and
philanthropic dimensions.
For example, Patagonia, the outdoor apparel company, is widely recognized for its strong CSR
commitment. The company donates 1% of its sales to environmental causes, uses recycled
2
materials in its products, and actively supports fair labour practices in its supply chain. This
demonstrates how CSR can be embedded into a company’s core business strategy while
fostering long-term social and environmental impact.
3
CSR can be divided into four main categories:
2. Ethical Labor Practices – Ensuring fair wages, safe working conditions, and
preventing child or forced labour.
Example: Nike improved labour conditions in its factories after past controversies.
These categories highlight how CSR integrates social, environmental, and ethical concerns into
business operations.
Moreover, CSR helps reduce operational risks and costs. For instance, adopting energy-
efficient technologies or sustainable supply chains can lower production expenses while
4
mitigating environmental and regulatory risks. Companies that engage in CSR also
experience a competitive advantage, as consumers and partners increasingly favour
businesses committed to social and environmental responsibility.
Furthermore, CSR enhances employee retention and attracts top talent. In today’s job
market, many professionals prefer to work for socially responsible companies that
prioritize ethical business practices and corporate citizenship.
In essence, CSR fosters ethical and sustainable development, ensuring that businesses
grow responsibly while benefiting people and the planet.
5
IV. Impacts of CSR
Integrating CSR into corporate strategies has significant effects on multiple levels:
➢ On the environment: waste reduction, energy consumption optimization, biodiversity
protection.
V. Implementation of CSR
2. Defining a CSR strategy: setting short- and long-term objectives aligned with the
company’s vision and values.
4. Monitoring and evaluation: measuring the impact of CSR initiatives and adjusting
actions based on the results obtained.
6
Chapter 2: BUSINESS ETHICS
For any decision that affects some individual in a positive or a negative way is a moral
decision—and decisions made by businesses are among those that affect individuals the most!
That being said, anyone who owns, or runs, or works for a business—in short, almost all of us!
—needs to be in the position to know which decisions are morally acceptable, and which are
morally not acceptable.
So, business ethics is the applied ethics discipline that addresses the moral features of
commercial activity. In practice, however, a dizzying array of projects is pursued under its 5
rubrics. Programs of legal compliance, empirical studies into the moral beliefs and attitudes of
business people, a panoply of best-practices claims (in the name of their moral merit or their
contribution to business success), arguments for (or against) mandatory worker participation in
management, and attempts in applying traditional ethical theories, theories of justice, or theories
applicable to firms or to the functional areas of business are all advanced as contributions to
business ethics and especially in its academic literature. These projects vary considerably and
often seem to have little in common other than the conviction, held by those who pursue them,
that whatever each is pursuing is business ethics. Therefore,
• Business ethics is a branch of ethics which prescribes standards regarding how the
business is to be carried out.
7
Figure 3: What is business ethics?
8
III. Definition of Business Ethics
According to Kirk O. Hanson, a renowned ethics expert who also doubles as the Executive
Director of the Markkula Centre for Applied Ethics, "business ethics is the study of the
standards of business behaviour which promote human welfare and the good."
Business Ethics can be defined as the critical, structured examination of how people &
institutions should behave in the world of commerce. In particular, it involves examining
appropriate constraints on the pursuit of self – interest or (for firm). Business ethics is defined
by the IBE as ‘the application of ethical values to business behaviour’.
According to R.E. Freeman, A.F. Stoner, “Ethics broadly and simply is the study of how our
decisions affect other people. It is also the study of people’s rights and duties and of the rules
that people apply in making decisions”
According to Wiley “Ethics reflects the character of the individual and more contemporarily,
perhaps the character of the business firm, which is a collection of individuals”.
9
IV. Importance of Business Ethics
Gautama Buddha (c. 5th–4th century BCE), who was a spiritual leader and the founder of
Buddhism, emphasized the significance of ethical business practices, comparing a trader to a
honeybee that extracts nectar without harming the flower. This analogy highlights the symbiotic
relationship between businesses and society—businesses benefit from consumers while also
contributing to their well-being. Ethics serve as the foundation for a successful and sustainable
business system.
● Employee Trust and Morale – Ethical business practices foster trust, equality,
teamwork, and a positive work culture among employees.
● Public and Government Trust – Ethical companies gain recognition and credibility,
strengthening their brand value and leadership position.
10
V. Role of Ethics
We have studied Ethics as the study of morality. It examines the moral standards of a society,
group, profession or religion, whether these standards are reasonable or not, i.e., whether they
are supported by good reasons. It is the process of examining the moral standards of a person
to determine whether these standards are reasonable or unreasonable to hold, in order to apply
them in practical situations and issues. The aim of ethics is to develop a body of moral standards
that we feel are reasonable to hold. We should not come to the conclusion that ethics is the only
way of studying morality. There are several social sciences like Anthropology, Sociology,
Psychology which study about morality.
Ethics is a normative study of morality, while other sciences make only a positive or descriptive
study of morality. We know that normative study inculcates norms in the study. It tells what is
good and what is bad. In other words, normative studies ultimately tell what are good and what
are not good; what are right and what are wrong. It is a study of what should be. On the other
hand, positive or descriptive study tells what it is. This does not reach any conclusion about
good or bad. Instead, it simply describes what they are.
Anthropologists or Sociologists may describe the character and culture of a particular society
or a group of aboriginal tribes. In this context, they may also study about moral standards
involved in the culture of the people. These social scientists would try to investigate the genesis
of that type of culture.
Finally, we have to differentiate between the terms Moral, Immoral and Unmoral. Morality
or moral is an expression connected with ethics which declares as good and right. On the other
hand, ‘immoral’ is a term which is considered as ‘inconsistent with what is right’. It is definitely
wicked or licentious. The term ‘unmoral’ does not connote immorality. Unmoral is an
expression which denotes ‘having no moral attached’. Morality is not given to making moral
reflections. This expression is also called amoral i.e., it is neither moral or immoral; without
moral sense or principles attached. Thus, Ethics is a study of moral standards whose explicit
purpose is to determine, as far as possible, whether a given moral standard (or moral
judgment based on that standard) is more or less correct.
11
VI. Elements of Business Ethics
Throughout the business world, no trait is more important and influential to the success of a
company than practicing respectable business ethics from the inside out. A solid ethics
foundation has four key elements.
12
(iv) Systems for Confidential Reporting:
This serves to provide employees with a means for reporting observed misconduct
or violations without fear of reprisal. This serves to further discourage ethical
violations, while getting everyone involved. It also provides the all-important “do
something about it” option. Additionally, early detection and resolution of ethical
problems may save the company huge amounts of money in cases such as theft or
other misconduct.
➢ Attracting and Retaining Talent: Ethical companies attract top talent and retain
employees by fostering a trustworthy and respectful work environment. An ethical
climate promotes teamwork, productivity, and professional growth.
13
Chapter 3: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CSR AND BUSINESS ETHICS
After clarifying the meaning of the concepts of business ethics and CSR, a question arises: Are
we dealing with two completely different concepts or are they synonymous? Moreover, what
are the fundamental differences or similarities between them in terms of the content of these
concepts?
Let us note that the term ethics is a combination of two well-known terms: "ethics" and
"business". CSR, on the other hand, is a term that combines three terms: "corporate", "social"
and "responsibility" (Dimitriades, 2007). The meaning of the terms constituting the above-
mentioned concepts also determines, at least in some sense, the meaning of the concepts we are
interested in this article (Zhou, 2022). The two eponymous concepts have been discussed above.
A brief history of business ethics as part of general ethics and various dimensions of the CSR
definitions have been also presented. Companies doing business activities are an integral part
of social, economic and biological life. Conducting business in accordance with the principles
of CSR results from the belief which has accompanied people for a long time that business is
not an amoral field and therefore, like any type of human activity, it is also subject to ethical
assessment.
The concept that connects CSR with ethics is moral responsibility, especially the moral
responsibility of an organization. Most often, the organization's responsibility for ensuring
financial success and economic growth was emphasized, leaving aside moral considerations
This view suggested that managers or employees do not need to focus on moral issues related
to decision-making in the company. The concept of economic responsibility dominated this
approach. However, if an organization chooses an action plan based on moral rather than
economic responsibility, the ethical behaviour of the organization is then manifested in social
systems such as CSR policies, codes of conduct or ethical principles developed within ethics
(Eriksson et al., 2013; Ha-Brookshire, 2017).
Many studies show that the individual moral responsibility of organizational employees and the
moral responsibility of the organization are interrelated (LoMonaco-Benzing, Ha-Brookshire,
2016; Poonamallee, Joy, 2018). This is a relation of the type that if the set goals of the
organization are consistent with the principles of moral responsibility, then it strengthens the
moral responsibility of employees and vice versa.
14
The close connection between the moral responsibility of an organization and its employees
results from the fact that organizations are social institutions. If we realize that ethics also arises
as an attempt to organize interpersonal relations, then we see a direct relationship between
business ethics and CSR.
The following definition of CSR seems to be explanatory according to which CSR is “the
integration of an enterprise’s social, environmental, ethical and philanthropic
responsibilities towards society into its operations, processes and core business strategy…”
(Rasche et al., 2017, p. 6).
In the light of the above definition, the concept of CSR appears as an attempt to implement
various dimensions of responsibility, including social responsibility, in business. It should also
be remembered, although this issue requires a separate study, that practitioners and academic
researchers have a different view of the relationship between business ethics and CSR (Ferrell
et al., 2019).
The development of business ethics and the concept of CSR in a practical dimension has given
us the paradigm of an entrepreneur as a person who combines business life with ethical life.
This is a person who produces goods and services for society but also treats other stakeholders
in a fair and equitable manner. The summary of the quite long scientific discourse on CSR shows
that this concept has not lost its vitality. Some problems were caused by framing CSR as an
issue related to the actions or results of a single entity, subject to self-regulation within legal
limits with a wide range of possibilities, and resulted in a frustrating and in many respects futile
discussion (Owen, Kemp, 2023). Linking the issues of CSR in the context of business ethics,
i.e. in the social context, allows us to avoid these difficulties. Also, responsibility outcomes are
better viewed from the point of view of multiple actors. because one is always responsible to
someone.
15
Chapter 4: Practical Case Study - Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Practices at Coca-Cola
Overview
The Coca-Cola Company, founded in 1886 and headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, is one of the
world’s most iconic and valuable brands, present in over 200 countries. Given its massive global
footprint, Coca-Cola bears significant responsibility for the social, environmental, and
economic impact it creates. Consequently, CSR is not just a peripheral strategy but a core pillar
of its long-term sustainability and license to operate.
1. Environmental sustainability
2. Community development
1. Environmental Sustainability
a. Water Stewardship
Water is a vital resource for Coca-Cola, making water stewardship one of its most ambitious
CSR goals.
• Water Replenishment Goal: Coca-Cola became the first Fortune 500 company to
claim it replenished 100% of the water used in its global beverages and production
processes by 2015—equivalent to over 191.9 billion liters annually.
• Projects: The company partners with governments, NGOs, and local communities to
implement watershed protection projects, improve irrigation, and restore wetlands.
Notable projects include:
o India: Coca-Cola partnered with TERI and other institutions to support local
water harvesting and recharge techniques.
16
o Mexico: Support for reforestation and watershed conservation projects in
drought-prone regions.
Through its “World Without Waste” initiative launched in 2018; Coca-Cola aims to:
Innovations:
17
c. Energy
Coca-Cola also is striving towards reducing energy wastes and expenses by introducing and
promoting renewable energy sources
d. Climate Action
• Target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25% across the value chain by 2030
(compared to 2015 baseline)
18
2. Community Engagement and Social Development
Coca-Cola's CSR programs are heavily geared toward uplifting the communities in which it
operates, particularly in the Global South.
a. Coca-Cola Foundation
The foundation, established in 1984, has awarded more than $1.5 billion in community support
initiatives globally. Focus areas include:
• Women Empowerment
• Natural disaster relief (e.g., hurricane and earthquake support in Haiti and Puerto Rico).
19
c. Economic Responsibilities
• Coca-Cola played an active role in providing employment and giving the community
opportunities to expand and grow
• For every job in the Coca-Cola system, 10 more jobs were created indirectly
• In 2007, they launched an initiative called Parivartan (Change) for training small
retailers in India
a. Product Diversification
• Introduced over 500 low- or no-sugar variants worldwide (e.g., Coca-Cola Zero Sugar,
Diet Coke, Vitamin water Zero).
• Expanded into non-carbonated drinks: juices, dairy, plant-based beverages, teas, and
water (e.g., Dasani, Minute Maid, Smart water).
• Coca-Cola publicly supports balanced diets and physical activity, often partnering with
sports organizations and fitness campaigns.
20
However, critics argue that marketing strategies often target low-income and vulnerable
populations, especially in developing countries, where regulations may be weaker.
• Respect for human rights and labor rights in the supply chain (based on ILO
conventions).
b. Responsible Marketing
c. Corporate Governance
In India (e.g., Kerala and Uttar Pradesh), the company has been accused of excessive
groundwater extraction, contributing to local water shortages. This led to:
21
• Public protests and legal disputes.
• In response, Coca-Cola increased its local water replenishment programs and opened
dialogues with communities.
b. Environmental Pollution
Coca-Cola has been repeatedly listed as a top plastic polluter by environmental watchdogs like
Break Free From Plastic. Activists argue that while Coca-Cola promotes recycling, it also
continues to produce millions of plastic bottles daily.
c. Labor Relations
Accusations of union busting and unsafe working conditions in bottling plants in Colombia and
Guatemala have damaged Coca-Cola’s image in the past. Independent investigations and
boycotts forced the company to review its supplier standards.
Coca-Cola's CSR journey illustrates the complexities and contradictions of global corporate
responsibility:
• On the other, persistent criticism around water rights, plastic waste, and labor
practices suggests that CSR must be more than a corporate branding exercise—it must
be woven into every layer of operations.
As such, Coca-Cola offers a compelling case of both best practices and learning curves,
making it a highly instructive model for CSR implementation in a globalized, ethically-
conscious business environment.
22
Conclusion
The study of Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reveals the growing
recognition that businesses are not only economic entities but also moral agents embedded in
society. As stakeholders—from customers and employees to governments and communities—
demand more accountability, the lines between profit-making and ethical responsibility are
becoming increasingly blurred. In today’s interconnected and transparent world, the long-term
success of a company is closely tied to its ethical standards, social impact, and environmental
stewardship.
The practical case study of The Coca-Cola Company provides a rich illustration of both the
potential and the pitfalls of corporate responsibility. Coca-Cola has made notable strides in
addressing critical global issues such as water conservation, climate change, waste
management, gender empowerment, and public health.
However, the case also highlights that CSR is not without complexity. Controversies over
groundwater usage in India, plastic pollution, and labour rights abuses expose the limitations
of corporate-led sustainability efforts and the ongoing tension between economic interests and
ethical obligations. These challenges underscore the need for transparency, continuous
stakeholder dialogue, independent monitoring, and inclusive decision-making.
Furthermore, this study affirms that business ethics must serve as the compass guiding CSR
initiatives. Ethical decision-making ensures that CSR goes beyond image-building and becomes
a genuine commitment to doing good while doing well.
In conclusion, integrating ethics and CSR into business strategy is not just a path to
legitimacy—it is a pathway to resilience, innovation, and positive global impact. The
responsibility of shaping a better future no longer lies with governments alone; companies, big
and small, must embrace their role as co-architects of a more equitable, sustainable, and humane
world.
23
Bibliography
➢ Bowen, H. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Publisher.
➢ Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making &
Cases. Publisher.
➢ Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and
Cases in a Global Context. Publisher.
➢ Lee, D. R., & McKenzie, R. B. The Ethics of Corporate Social Responsibility. Publisher.
➢ Abera, M. (2015). Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. University of
Punjabi.
➢ Vevere Velga & Svirina Anna. Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility.
EKA University of Applied Science
24