0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 46 views15 pagesLearning 1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Psych ology
Degree Classes Vol. I
BS (4 Years)
TETChapter 7
sore etaeeterre EARNING. | Soest
f us, from
nate The aa ty to adapt our environment, at homes and
adapting to increasing complex ““clopment from birth to death involves
continuously updated knowledge eine enenging environments, using
Many Ot caaties are born with a genetic blue print for life. We
struggle to @ life direction, we learn from experience. Our learning
gives us flexibility. We can learn a lot and adapt to almost any environment.
Indeed, Nature's most important gift to us may be our adaptability. It is our
capacity to learn new behaviour that enables us to cope with ever-changing
circumstances.
Learning is the modification of pre-existing behaviour and
understanding; it may have been present at birth, acquired through
maturation or learned earlier. People learn primarily by identifying
relationships between events and noting the regularity in the world around
them, When two things repeatedly occur together, people can predict the
occurrence of one from knowledge of the other.
What relationships do people identify? How do they do it? What
determines whether and how people learn? These and other basic questions
about learning are among the most frequently and intensively studied topics
in psychology.
Definition
ed ively permanent change in behaviour
Learning is defined as a relative © * ta!
resulting fom vespaniehces The term behaviour is defined very broadly to
include reflexes, voluntary behaviours er behaviours, unobservable
behaviours, such as thinking, or even neu"? activities in the brain.
Le i bserved directly, but is inferred from changes in
observable be eh Leaming occurs bap we demonstrate new shieiD
ourselves, ewirnlna; earig “ancing et. Learning is apparen
7 imming,
™Provements in our performance.
c i ;
characteristics ofLearning through experience. Experience Lit
Learning can take place 0" ad quriNg our life time, usually involving
Something that happens -216 _An Introduction to Psychology
interaction with our environment. Experience includes taking
information and making responses that affect the environment, a.
practicing the skill of driving a car.
Psychologists are especially interested in discovering what aspects ,.
behaviour ca he changed through experience and how such chan, 5
come about. Some lasting changes in behaviour require a combinati,
of experience and maturational readiness. :
ange in behaviour, So ¢,
- Learning is defined as relativel permanent cl 0
qualify ae learned, a change in behaviour must es relative,
permanent. When one learns swimming, probably always a able to dg
so, Those changes caused by fatigue, drug or any disease are
transient, so cannot be called as learning. ,
= Learning is the most important factor in behaviour. Learning means for
more than acquiring academic information or skills. Learning jg
discussed and studied to understand the effects of environment on
behaviour. }
~ Learning pervades our lives. It is involved in mastering a new skill or
academic subject as well as in emotional development, social
interaction and even personality development. We learn what to fear,
what to love, how to be polite, how to be intimate and so on. Learning
is pervasive in our lives. Children learn to perceive the world around
them, to identify with appropriate sex, and to control their behaviour
according to adult standards.
> The change in behaviour potential is traceable to experience and
practice, which is caused by learning. Learning is closely related to
knowledge, skill and intention. Knowledge and intention are usually
thought to be acquired through experience and skill through practice.
- Learning is never really observed directly, but it is inferred from
observation of a change in performance.
ra Learning shapes our thoughts and language, motivations and
emotions, our personalities and attitudes.
> Learning in all such realm, breeds hope. What is learnable we can
potentially teach. This fact encourages parents, educators, athletic
coaches and animal trainers.
~ What has been learned that can potentially be changed by new
learning. It underlies counselling, psychotherapy and rehabilitation.
‘Of all the world’s creatures, we humans are the most capable of
changing our behaviour through learning.
Performance
alway eee and performance are closely related, but performance is nat
oe an accurate reflection of the amount learned. For'example when © 7
eam performs poorly, that does not mean that the team had lost 2”
of their skills. Other factors such ;
' as tensions or dis i ted the
from performing at the level of their true ability. elstractlonisiprevenSchool teachers frequently rep,
their capabilities. The students May pelt that student:
but for some reason these are Not reg, 7]
performance is often attributed to lack of od in their
Of motivation
In short, learning covers q ‘
understand a complex object or an tue of activities from inner struggle to
faite hae( , cademic subject. oO;
several theorists think Personality results, mainly er ics grand scale,
scale, classical conditioning &xperiments im Ng. On a small
behaviours as fleeting and Slight as the blink of on aye ch 'mpinge on
ene MEADOR NAD SERIES, Thasctiatite one last a inti © the
Like motivation and personal i
: 2 ity, learni
subject. Sometimes the learner is tinaacte of the fe
is an elusive research
cannot observe learning directly,
arning. As Psychologists
they have to infer it from performance, :
TYPES OF LEARNING
Greek Philosopher Aristotle concluded thi
Our minds naturally
them. Simple animal:
at we learn by association,
connect events that occur in sequence;
We humans can learn by all these ways; and through language, we
can learn things we have neither experienced nor observed. It includes
learning of moral ideas, self concept, depth perception etc.
Learning can be of following types. These are also considered as
methods of learning.
de Learning by Observation
2. Learning by Cognition/Insight
3. Learning by Trial and Error
4 Learning by Conditioning
‘ id
Humans and animals utilize these methods according tothe nes? ba
their capacity. Most often, we apply more than one method at a time.
1. Learning by Observation
When we observe and imitate others, Bega that [s
by observation. The process of observing and imitating (aete
called modeling, Bendura believes that much of our teaming
through observation. We learn by watching others p
imitate what we observe.
called learning
vation is often
g takes place
then, we
al
; observation:
The process of learning by watching oalL kines Sod beh
{E2MIng, also known as social learning. We learn all kinds OY FE nen
st
by observing and imitating models. Models are mo La218 __An Introduction to Psychology
actions and words are co
s insistent. Children are particularly influenceg by
behaviours of adults and .
peers’ role models.
The fact that people can learn by watching the behaviour of oth
does not mean that they always will. At one time or another, most Peo)
ignore the experience of others and must find out something else 5.
themselves. What determines whether observational learning will occur? Wh
determines whether we will imitate a model? Bendura believes part OF th,
answer is reinforcements and punishments. We look and we learn. We imit3
those we respect and admire, those we perceive as similar to ourselves ang
those we perceive as successful.
Observational learning may involve self-reinforcement, which ate
thoughts and. statements that we make to ourselves. That is we ate
deliberately controlling or reinforcing our learning process. We learn mi,
through observation of models, both pro-social and anti-social behavioy;;
So, observational learning can be positive and negative, as well. Children may
learn to perform helpful behaviours by watching their teachers, i.e. to help
other students with school problems.
According to Bendura, there are four requirements in observationa|
learning.
a. Attentional Process Close attention is necessary to what is
happening around. People cannot learn unless they are able to observe
model's behaviour. Attention paid to model depends upon several
factors of observational learning. A child may be more likely to imitate
an uncle than a father.
b. Retentional Process The learner organizes and retains what has
been observed, reliving experiences, mentally rehearsing future
experience. Through imagination and language, the learnef builds a
cognitive map.
C4 Motor Reproduction Process It is related to the reproduction of
behaviour which is observed. Learner converts the cognitive
representation into actions; it depends on the physical capability of
leaner.
Motivation The actual or imagined rewards of imitated determine
whether the behaviour will extinguish or not. People are most likely t°
imitate those whom they see rewarded for their behaviour and whom
they like. Liking tends to be enhanced if the model is similar to the
observer in gender, age or other characteristics or is attractive °"
powerful.
Observational
: e
_Ob learning seems to be a powerful source of tM
socialization. Experim
ents show that childr illing to help 2
share after seeing a tt en are more willing
|
demonstration of helping by a warm, powerful mod!
even after some months have elapsed. eae oe
Studies show that followi i fective role"
observational learning. wing general conclusions play eOe eer "
del’s obse! ;
A mode tved behaviour will be most infl
Model is seen as having reinforcing consequ raat
, ences
The model is perceived positively, of high ee lik
sl iS, liked and res
1. There are perceived similarities bet spected
I. fnodel and observer tween features and
traits of
Ve The observer is reinforced for
r ee Sour paying attention to the model's
Vv. The model’s behaviour is visible and salient
Vi Model is within the observer's range of com,
behaviour eee
The capacity to learn from watching as well as from doing, is
extremely useful. It enables us to acquire large integrated patterns af
behaviour, without going through the tedious process of gradually eliminating
wrong responses and building up the right ones through trial and error.
It enables us to profit from the mistake and success of others. Our
behaviour is filled with examples of lessons learned through observation. We
recognize poisonous objects, harmful things, caring techniques, safety
measures and many others, only by observing others. At this stage, you can
fill a long list about the observational-learning of your own.
In his — social learning. theory Albert Bendura pointed out, that
behaviour results from a continuous interaction between several significant
factors. These include imitation, vicarious learning and symbolic learning. But
the learner also plays-a prominent role in cognitively selecting, organizing and
transforming stimuli from the environment.
Related to social learning theory, psychologists have identified at least
three different kinds of modeling; imitation, observational learning and
vicarious learning. Observational learning has been ‘discussed earlier.
Imitation Pure imitation is blind copying of -other's behaviour. Usually
students do this, while they COPY the mannerisms of their favourite teachers.
Young children often copy the behaviour without knowing why.
Vicarious Learn our includes an awareness
of consequences by someone else incurs 2
reinforcer or an aversive sti
Whatever type of modeling occurs,
imitation can be inspired by either a live or symbolic model. In live modeling,
the model can be another person. In-general, the more similarity between
model and: learner, the more fearning will occur. Studies indicate that the
higher the status of model, the more the observer will imitate behaviour. That
is why celebrities are booked for advertisements.
ing Often observation of. behavi
of behaviour, whether, an action
imulus.
researchers have discovered that
2. Learning by Cognition (Insight)
Tolman was one of the earliest researchers. to underline the
jearning. cognitive learning means using
importance of cognitive processes in220 _ An Introduction to Psychology
thought processes while learning. Cognitive theorists assign a major ik
mental activity in any learning. They argue organisms do not always te
within a precise pattern defined by stimulus and response.
Kohler In some learning, it appears that there is no connection bet
sudden insights or understanding and external rewards. Gestalt Psychojo,
use the term insight instead of cognition. Gestalt psychologist vy.
Kohler illustrates this form of learning. Gestalt psychologists believer,
learning must be treated as a whole. They argued that learning cay
sudden flashes or insight only when learner put pieces together in Such 2
that the completed whole exceeded the mere total of those pieces,
Experiments Kohler conducted his experiments on chimpanzees, to ;,
the essence of learning. He put them in cages. In a typical situation, a <;.
chimpanzee named Sultan was prevented from reaching a piece of fruit
the bars of his cage.
Kohler gave Sultan a stick, but it was also short. Sultan gazed aro,
picked up the short stick; through the bars it scratched another longer
which was lying outside the cage; joined the two sticks and grabbed the fru
Kohler explained that Sultan learned to solve his problem by putting sey.
pieces together into a meaningful whole. The solution resulted from insigh|
sudden realization following a period of mental activity.
In other set of experiments, Kohler put the food high above the reach,
of chimpanzees in a cage, along with a box. Kohler reported that as a result
of insight, chimpanzees suddenly discovered that they could grab the food by
jumping up on the box. Kohler believed that insight ability, demonstrated by
his chimpanzees, differed from the trial and error learning described by
Thorndike. Kohlar argued that solution to problems occur when individual can
view the entire problem field and rearrange the elements of the problem into
@ new configuration. Solutions have a perceptual quality to them, and they
occur quickly, once the components have been reconfigured. Kohlar used the
term insight to label such a process.
Kohler criticized Thorndike’s work arguing that its experimental
condi‘ions were artificial and allowed the research animals to display only
randon behaviours. He viewed that an animal in a maze could not see the
overa'l pattern or design, but only each alley, as it was encountered.
There. ore, the animals could try one path at a time.
In the Gestalt’s view, the organisms must be able to perceive the
felatinships among the various parts of the problem before insight learning
can c¢ccur. These studies supported the Gestalt’s global connection ©
behav our. The research also reinforced the Gestalt idea that learning involves
a reo! Janization of one’s psychological environment.
A it
Tolm.n He proposed a cognitive explanation of learning, suggesting i
repea ed performance of a task strengthens the learned relationship be ae
envirenmental cues and the Organism’s expectations. In this way, org igh
get te know its environment. Tolman called these learned relationshipsestalts", and they are built by the ——————___Leaming
cor a
constructs a cognitive map and then fdas Performance of
easily, OF 8 task
ze
People ar i
9 from one point to another by several route Aer with their
Mae ne tak reweee, Whole area. Tolman reject
effect, Say! ing reward or reinforcement has litle inte pe
luence o)
ike's
Nn learnin
3, Learning by Trial and Error
Edward Lee Thorndike fashioned
theory that focused on Overt behaviour, H
concrete connections between stimuli and r
@ mechanistic objectiv
le interpreted learning in term
esponses, Hee
Thorndike introduced trial and err i
ie ‘or learning, alth t
call it trial and accidental-success. This learning ehesaaete tibal ot
response tendencies: iat lead to success. Thorndike introduced law of effec
and law of exercise in his series of experiments on anii
2a Sia imals. He named them
Experiment Thorndike devised an elaborate cage called a puzzle box. A
hungry cat was placed in the puzzle box and had to learn some responses ie.
stepping on a small lever, in order to unlock the door and get out. When the
cat succeeded, it: was rewarded with food and then placed back inside the
box. After several trials, the cat learned to open the door. After that, when
put in the cage; the cat walked calmly to the lever; pushed it down with its
paw; strolled through the door and ate the food.
Learning process by trial and error is not so complicated, rather it is
simple. Learner tries many efforts again and again and by the time successful
efforts are repeated and rest are left. Same is the case here, on the first few
trials, the cat performed great many responses randomly. Eventually stepped
on the lever and the door opened. Any response that did not produce a
rewarding effect became weaker overtime and the response that did have a
rewarding effect became stronger overtime. At last, cat learned to open the
door without any error.
Thorndike concluded that learning and problem solving was a process
of trial and “accidental success” with unsuccessful behaviours gradually being
eliminated in favour of behaviours that worked.
Law of Effect Thorndike stated that learning is governed by the lew ot
Itis a basic principle of learning, which states that earning iti oho
consequences, This law states that the power of a au a reward, and
response is strengthened when the response is ae YY
Weakened if the response is not followed by a reward. : sessieatof Bs
According to this law, if a response made in ie OT tobe
Particular stimulus is followed by a reward, that respon
Made next time the stimulus is encountered.
Law of Exercise This law states that any TesPonee ©
Situation becomes associated with the situation.
made in 2 particular
ore the response isN
222 _An Introduction to Psychology s
sociated
used in a given situation, the more strongly it 1 OE Te. wit
Simply repeating a response tends to strengthen thal a
Laws of learning given by Thorndike are widely applicable to hur
learning.
4, Learning by Conditioning
Learning by association is call
two kinds of associative learning hi
and operant conditioning.
led learning by conditioning. Traditions
ave been of particular interest; classic.
have studied conditioning usually take
behaviouristic approach. They operated following general Seetlmptlons.
i. Simple associations of the classical or operant kind are the building
blocks of all learning, no matter how complex.
ii, The laws of learning are roughly the same for all species and can
revealed in experiments, even with lower organisms in relatively
barren environments. Thus the laws that govern how a rat learns to
run a maze presumably govern how a child learns long division
(Skinner, 1938).
iii. Learning can be better understood in terms of external or
environmental causes than internal, intentional ones. The ultimate
causes of behaviour presumably lie in environmental events,
particularly those that are rewarding or punishing.
The behaviourist approach has uncovered a wealth of findings about
simple associative learning. However, behaviourists have faced two serious
challenges. The ethnological approach disputes the behaviourists’ claim that
laws of learning are the same for all organisms, and all situations, while laws
of learning are the same for all organisms and all situations, while cognitive
theory disputes the behaviourists’ assumption that associations are the only
building blocks of learning, and that learning can be understood by
considering only environmental factors.
Psychologists who
Classical Conditioning
____ Classical conditioning is based on the association iring of an
originally neutral stimulus with a response producing canes This pairing of
‘stimuli eventually produces a conditioned or learned response. In classical
conditioning, a neutral stimulus paired one or more times with a biologically
swale stimulus, acquires the power to elicit a behavioural response in the
absence of the biologically significant stimulus. Classical conditioning could
‘ake place only when the two events to be associated occurred close together:
Paviov’s experiment was the fi ical
irst_ demonstration of classic
conditioning. Ivon Pavlov was a Russian physiologist, and won a Nobel Prize
in 1904, for his work on the dog's digest rn
Pavlov noticed that his d i /
vihen they sow the ars GO9S sometimes salivated in the absence of food °Peak ae
He observed dogs learned
ynlearned behaviour is inborn or innate. pan’? %
response connections. They include salivat i flex
response to spoiled food, shivering in tashcreen a
in response to the throat being clogged aipincae low te
and withdrawal in response to blows or bu onstriction ir
responses to natural stimuli. They can also as i the
stimuli and unconditioned responses, Conditioner 4
neutral stimulus is paired and associated with a stimul ccurs
a reflexive response until the previously neutral eiaiue ai
S alone
similar response. In classical conditioning, an i
organi arns
follows another. " ganisrn learns th
Learning
and unle ing
Pavlov’s Experiment
Pavlov’s experimental method was to present food to the dog and
measures the amount of saliva. He discovered that if a neutral stimulus, one
that didn’t automatically elicit saliva, such as a bell was paired repeatedly
with the food; the dog would gradually learn to salivate at the sound of bell
alone, without any food.
Paviov's device for recording
salivation. The isolated
dog's saliva was collected drop by
dropina tube. Food was delivered
by remote control, and through a
window, the experimenter
observed the dog.
d to a formerly neutral stimulus, because that
stimulus is paired with another stimulus which already elicits a response, is
the essential characterization of classical conditioning.
‘ioni i citi
Before conditioning, saliva is called an uncon
and food is called an unconditioned stimulus (US). Wh
Learning to respon
joned response (UR)
en “bell”, a neutral
neral response of attention, but will
| 1 icit jel
stimulus is presented, it may elicit a 9 e, saliva). During conditioning, the
not elicit the unconditioned response (i.e. L
nautral sepals (bell) and the unconditioned stimulus (food) are both
imi iri he
presented a number of times in close proximity. After repeated peas rl
bell alone can elicit salivation. Learning has taken placer te eee ce
stimulus is now called the conditioned stimulus (cs) an res) Nabure
conditioned stimulus alone is called the conditioned respo!aN
224 _ An introduction to Psychology Sh
provided the US-UR connection, but conditioning creates the cc
connection,
Before Conditioning
Unconditioned Response (jc,
Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS), e
(Food) TTT (Salivati,”
itic imulus (CS), No Response or
Conditioned Stimul ne 5 ih Tiligsiot Response
During Conditioning
itioned Stimulus (UCS)
shen i eacth Unconditioned Response (Ucy
+ Rel DNs (Salivation)
Conditioned Stimulus (CS)
(Bell)
After Conditioning
Conditioned Response (CR)
Conditioned Stimulus (CS)
(Salivation)
(Bell)
Pavlov laid the central pheriomena of classical conditioning. Some of
Pavlov’s basic findings are:
Acquisition It is the initial learning of the stimulus-response link in classical
conditioning. This involves a neutral stimulus being associated with the UCS
and becoming the conditioned stimulus (CS) that elicits the CR. Two
important aspects of acquisition are timing and contingency/predictability.
Time The time interval between the CS and the UCS is one of the most
important aspects of classical conditioning (Weideman, Georgilas and Kehoe,
1999). It defines the contiguity or connectedness in time and spaces of the
stimuli. Conditioned responses develop when the CS and UCS are contiguous,
occurring close together, Often, optimal spacing is a fraction of a second
(Kimble, 1961). In Pavlov’s experiment, if the- bell had rung 20 minutes
before food, the dog probably would not associate the bell with the food.
Generalization Generalization, in classical conditioning, is the tendency of
new stimulus that is similar to the original conditioned stimulus to elicit @
response that is similar to the conditional response (Jones, Kenenes, 2
Benjamin, 2001). Generalization has value in preventing learning from being
tied to specific stimuli.
Discrimination _In classical conditioning, discrimination is the proces i
learning to respond to certain stimuli and not to respond to others (Murphy,
Baker and Fouquet, 2001). To produce discrimination, Pavlov gave food tee
er ringing the bell and not after any oth Leaming 225
§ other
ly aft
gog O” ist
ae feared C0 distinguish between the bell and other saan
i. her sounds may
ation In classical conditioni .
extine ning, extincti
estoned response In the absence of the rection is the weakening of
ued association with the unconditioned qdinlus (css mee “vita
), the conditio “
contin a
simul (CS) loses its power to elicit the condit
extinction is not always the end of a conditioned berones (En response (CR
‘ooks .
SI ontaneous Recovery It is the process in classical conditi ks, 2000
spujtioned response can recur after atime delay with by whicha
conditioning fafter the extinction, when Pavlov took the deg oo further
corfrang the bell, the dog ory ad to salivate without food, whic Pe oie
spontaneous recovery. , which is called
Some psychologists argue
conditioning, but it is accepted no
ortion of our behaviour can be bette
p eee
dassical conditioning.
that all behaviour is based on classical
longer. Still it is agreed that a significant
r understood by noting the influence of
Operant Conditioning
Operant conditioning is second type of conditioning and considered
basic type of learning, presented by B.F. Skinner. Operant conditioning is 2
kind of learning in whicl quences of behaviour influence whether a
person oF animal will perform the same behaviour in the future.
In 1930, Skinner began publishing a series of papers. He extended and
formulized many of Thorndike's ideas. Skinner emphasized that during
instrumental conditioning an organism learns a response by operating the
environment, SO he called it operant conditioning. His primary aim was to
analyze how behaviour is changed by its consequences. His work has led to
the identification of the basic elements and laws of operant conditioning. He is
the leading figure in the field of operant conditioning.
He contributed a lot in analyzing, predicting and controlling behaviour.
His pioneering efforts have led to the development of an entire philosophy of
behaviour, known aS functional analysis, f its emphasis on the
functions and the conseq haviour. His discoveries have been the
foundation for a whole new technology of behaviour modification, which has
already had enormous success in its application and has been one ‘of the most
controversial developments in the history of psychology:
Skinner studied the behaviour of pigeons, rats and human beings
including his own children. He has made operant conditioning famous. An
operant is a res| that act upon the environment in
ponse or class of responses al ps
the same way each time. trasted operant with respondents.
Re: Skinner CO! erant $
ok spondents are behaviours elicit ed stimuli, Learner's operants
ie a key role in the conditioning process of operant conditioning. AS
Pee oalsts explain it, the response is emitted by the organism, whic
deans, response is produced ‘spontaneously without any immediately
lentifiable stimulus.
uences of bel228 An Introduction to Psychology
Pigeons were reinforced for pecking a key when @ red light was on,
not reinforced for pecking when green light was on. Eventually they will p
only when they see red light, It is called discriminative stimuli; it is the Stiry
that signal whether reinforcement is available if a certain response is ma
When individual learns to make a particular response in the presence of o;
stimulus but not another, stimulus discrimination has occurred.
Shaping In his experiments, Skinner used “shaping” @ Pee in whic
successive rewards guide an animal's natural behaviour sown Is a desire,
behaviour. Behaviour shaping is a basic step in operant condinorine Shaping
is accomplished by reinforcing successive approximations, that is, responses
that come successively closer to the desired response.
Avoidance Conditioning When organism responds to a signal ina way that
avoids exposure to an aversive stimulus, avoidance conditioning has
occurred.
Along with positive reinforcement avoidance conditioning is one of the
most important influences on everyday behaviour. Most people go to school
‘or work, even when they would rather stay in bed. They stop on red signal,
even when they are in a hurry. Each of these behaviours reflect avoidance
conditioning, because each behaviour allows people to avoid a negative
consequence, such as losing a job or being fined.
Escape Conditioning The effect of negative reinforcement can be studied
through escape conditioning. Escape conditioning takes place when an
organism learns to make a response in order to end an aversive stimulus or
negative reinforcer. Dogs learn to jump over the bar to escape shock.
Stimulus Generalization It also occurs in operant conditioning. Organisms
often perform a response in the presence of a stimulus that is similar to the
reinforced previously.
Difference between Operant and Classical Conditioning
Classical and operant conditioning both involve acquisition, extinction,
spontaneous recovery, generalization and discrimination; M
is straightforward. iscrimination; yet their difference
1. Classical conditioning inv
sical olves respondent behaviour. 0} erant
conditioning involves operant behaviour i.e, voluntary action. e
2 In assical conditioning, controling stimulus comes before the
reinforcer, aca conditioning, the controlling stimulus, @
tic teks oiohatios ah mh the response. This consequence is contingent
food. aviour, when animal performs a trick and obtain?
3.
In_ operat i
eee ee reinforcement depends upon the proper
ree), ene sical conditioning, unconditioned stimulus
renee egerdless of what the animal does. (The meat pode"
the dog salivates to the sound or not).selection of response is also different
response must be selected from a set
conditioning, the response is forced, that i
trumental Conditioning
I
Operant conditionin
of alternatives,
9 the
In classi
is not a matter of choice
Ins!
Instrumental conditioning is a little bit di
conditioning, but most of the times both soto Operant
Instrumental conditioning is associated with the names of E.L. Thornd fel
B.F. Skinner. Thorndike was the first to perform laboratory experiments | i
instrumental conditioning. His law of effect is the forerunner rote
contemporary principle of reinforcement. :
Instrumental conditioning involves more actively on the part of the
learner than classical conditioning. The term instrumental indicates that
learner has some control over his own circumstances. Whenever a person
behaves for gaining the reward or avoiding the punishment, that behaviour is
an example of instrumental conditioning.
Instrumental learning involves. learning about the consequences of
behaving in a certain way. For example, individual learns that if a particular
response.is made, it will be followed by a particular stimulus event. As a little
boy might learn that if he cries his mother will pay attention to him and
comfort him. This learning consists of discovering that a particular response is
followed by particular stimulus events or consequences.
In this learning, the stimulus consequence is contingent upon the
learner's. making a_ particular response. In short, responses have
consequences, and if we want to produce particular consequences, we have to
make particular responses, because the consequences are contingent upon
the responses. Instrumental ‘conditioning involves a contingency between a
response and the subsequent stimulus consequence, the reinforcer. The
reinforcer is contingent upon the prior occurrence of a particular response.
Difference between Instrumental and Operant Conditioning
Instrumental and operant conditioning differ from each other in one |
the experimenter defines
important respect. In instrumental ‘conditioning, ss
each opportunity for the subject to produce a response. Conditioning is
usually measured by how long it takes for the response to appear.
7 In operant conditioning, the subject is free to make responses at any
time, so conditioning is measured by the rate of responding. In most other
ways, however, thei! ‘orms of learning are essentially the same.
Transfer of Training
The effect of past motor or mental learning on new learning is
designated as transfer of training. This may be classified as: \
1 Positive Transfer of Training When the learning of an pe
facilitates the acquisition of a new skill, it is considered as positive
transfer of training. The learning of the vocabulary of a language~
230 An Introduction to Psychology ———————_—_——.
helpful in the study of the text book. Once the driving of a;
learned, it becomes easier to drive cars of different models.
2. Negative Transfer of Training If the past experience hinders
than aids the acquisition of a new skill, it is inferred as neq
transfer. Football player can face difficulty in playing basket ba)
components in these two games are not identical. Football js
played by hands, while basketball is a game of hands. Minin,
instances of negative transfer of training are observed in daily
These effects are not lasting, rather these are covered easily an,
repetition totally eliminates these e' fects.
3. Zero Transfer of Training This means that performance in the ney
situation is neither aided nor hindered by past training. Learning music
and playing football have no identical components; therefore, the
measuring device will detect no transfer effect.
4. Bilateral Transfer of Training Practicing an activity with a particular
facilitates performance of the same activity
part of the body usually
with another part of the’ body. Generally this type of positive
transference is between the symmetrical parts of the body i.e. from
eye to eye, from hand to hand and from foot to foot. This sort of
transference is a bilateral transfer. Bilateral transfer is not only limited
to symmetrical counterpart; rather it could be nonsymmetrical as well,
ion between Bilateral Transfer and Transfer of Training
Distincti
If the past experience hinders or aids the acquisition of a new skill, it
is considered transfer of training; but. when an activity is learned with a
particular part of the body, and if required, the same activity is performed by
another body organ, it will be inferred as bilateral transfer. The nature of the
activity is not changed, rather the skill is being transferred to the other organ
of the body, Children learn to write with the preferred hand but when they
feel like writing with the non-preferred hand, they do it. But there will be n0
fluency, beauty and skill because the activity is carried out without practice.
QiGRS