RAG and Its Variants

Understanding Graph RAG, Light RAG, and Agentic RAG

Standard RAG Graph RAG Light RAG Agentic RAG

A Comparative Analysis of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Technologies

Exploring the technical differences, performance metrics, and optimal use cases

July 24, 2025 Advanced AI Technologies

What is Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)?

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an architectural approach that enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by
connecting them to external, authoritative knowledge bases. Instead of relying solely on pre-trained data, the LLM
retrieves relevant, up-to-date information from a specified data source and uses this as context to generate more
accurate responses.

User Query Retrieve Augment Generate Response

External Knowledge Retriever Augmenter Generator (LLM)

Base Converts user queries into Combines retrieved information Uses the augmented prompt
vectors and searches the with the original user query to along with its pre-existing
Repository of external data
knowledge base for the most create an "augmented prompt" knowledge to generate the final,
broken down into smaller
relevant chunks of information. for the LLM. informed response.
"chunks" and stored as
embeddings in a vector
database.

Key Benefits of RAG

Enhanced accuracy and reduced hallucinations Access to current information beyond the Increased trust and transparency through
model's knowledge cutoff citations

Cost-effective alternative to fine-tuning or Greater developer control over information Integration of new knowledge without
retraining sources computational costs

2/16
Standard RAG Architecture
Standard RAG consists of four interconnected components that work together to enhance LLM capabilities by
grounding responses in external knowledge.

User Query 1. External KB 2. Retriever 3. Augmenter 4. Generator Response

External Knowledge Base Retriever

Repository of external data that the LLM does not have in its Component responsible for searching the knowledge base for
training set. relevant information.

Consists of document repositories, databases, or APIs Converts user's query into a vector representation

Data is broken down into smaller, semantically relevant Uses relevancy search to find the most relevant chunks
"chunks"
Typically returns multiple chunks based on semantic similarity
Chunks are converted into numerical representations
May apply filters or reranking to improve results
(embeddings)

Embeddings are stored in a vector database for efficient

retrieval

Augmenter Generator (LLM)

Combines retrieved information with the original user query. The augmented prompt is sent to the Large Language Model.

Creates an "augmented prompt" that provides context Uses the new context along with its pre-existing knowledge

Uses sophisticated prompt engineering techniques Generates the final, informed response for the user
Formats the combined information in a way that's accessible Can be any Large Language Model (ChatG, GPT, etc.)
to the LLM
The quality of the response depends on the LLM and prompt
Ensures the prompt is structured to achieve the desired design
output

3/16
Benefits of Standard RAG

Implementing a Standard RAG architecture offers significant advantages for generative AI applications, addressing
many of the inherent limitations of standalone LLMs.

Enhanced Accuracy Current Information Increased Trust

By grounding responses in verifiable, RAG systems can be connected to Because the system retrieves specific
external data, RAG significantly reduces continuously updated data sources, information to formulate an answer, it
the likelihood of the LLM generating allowing them to provide responses can provide citations and references to
false or misleading information based on the most current information the source documents, increasing user
(hallucinations). available, overcoming the knowledge trust and confidence in the AI's output.
cut-off limitation of statically trained
LLMs.

Cost-Effectiveness Developer Control

RAG is a cost-effective alternative to Developers have direct control over the
fine-tuning or fully retraining an LLM for information sources used by the RAG
specific domains. It allows for the system. They can update, add, or
integration of new knowledge without remove data as needed, restrict access
incurring the high computational costs to sensitive information, and more RAG effectively addresses key limitations of
and time associated with model easily troubleshoot the system. standard LLMs
training.

4/16
Introduction to RAG Variants
While standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) significantly improves LLM performance, its reliance on simple
vector-based retrieval can be limiting for complex queries. To address these shortcomings, several advanced RAG
variants have been developed, each enhancing different aspects of the RAG pipeline.

GraphRAG LightRAG Agentic RAG

Integrates knowledge graphs into the retrieval Simple, fast, and cost-effective alternative Transforms LLMs by integrating autonomous
process, structuring data into a network of incorporating lightweight graph structures into AI agents that can reason, plan, and use tools
entities and their relationships. text indexing and retrieval. for dynamic retrieval.

Knowledge Graph Integration Graph-Enhanced Indexing AI Agent Integration

Replaces vector-only databases with Streamlined graph integrated with vector Embbeds autonomous agents that make
structured graphs representations decisions and take actions

Multi-Hop Reasoning Dual-Level Retrieval Dynamic Planning

Traverses multiple nodes to answer complex Two-tiered process for efficiency and context Decomposes queries and adapts retrieval
questions strategies

Incremental Updates
Enhanced Retrieval Efficient data integration reducing update time Multi-Agent Frameworks
Graph traversals combined with semantic by ~50% Specialized agents collaborate for complex
search tasks

Key Insight: Each RAG variant addresses specific limitations of standard RAG, offering enhanced capabilities for different types of queries
and use cases. The choice between them depends on factors like query complexity, performance requirements, and cost constraints.

5/16
GraphRAG: Architecture & Implementation
GraphRAG represents a significant evolution from traditional RAG by integrating knowledge graphs into the retrieval
process. Instead of treating information as isolated text chunks, GraphRAG structures data into a network of entities
and their relationships, enabling a deeper contextual understanding.

Knowledge Graph Integration GraphRAG Knowledge Graph Structure

Replaces or augments vector-only databases with knowledge graphs,
allowing the system to represent and query relationships between
different pieces of information explicitly.

Graph Generation
Knowledge graphs can be constructed by using an LLM to extract
entities and relationships from unstructured text documents and
represent them in a graph structure.

Multi-Hop Reasoning
The interconnected nature of the graph allows the system to traverse
multiple nodes and relationships to answer complex questions that
require synthesizing information from various sources.

Technical Implementation Highlights

Enhanced Retrieval Leverages structured graph data to inform the LLM

Retrieval is performed through graph traversals, which can be Enables reasoning across multiple hops in a knowledge graph
combined with semantic search to find the most relevant subgraphs for
Combines graph traversals with semantic search for relevant
a given query, providing more contextually rich information.
subgraphs

Provides more contextually rich information compared to simple vector

search

6/16
GraphRAG: Real-World Applications
GraphRAG's ability to model complex relationships makes it ideal for domains where understanding connections is
critical.

Finance and Banking Healthcare and Biotech

GraphRAG excels in fraud detection and risk assessment by GraphRAG connects patient data with medical literature and
analyzing connections between transactions and accounts. biological pathways.

Identifies anomalous patterns in transaction networks to detect Enables drug discovery by connecting molecular structures and
fraud disease targets

Assesses risk by analyzing account relationships and behavior Supports clinical trial analysis through patient stratification and
patterns outcome tracking

Scores credit based on payment history and interconnected Diagnoses diseases by correlating symptoms with medical
financial data conditions and treatments

Legal and Compliance Supply Chain Management

GraphRAG facilitates review of contracts and regulations by GraphRAG helps assess risks and ensure compliance in complex
mapping legal precedents. supply networks.

Analyzes contract terms and their relationships with legal cases Models supply chain networks to identify single points of failure
Maps case law and regulations to identify relevant legal Conducts risk assessments by analyzing supplier relationships
precedents and dependencies

Ensures compliance by tracking regulatory changes and Facilitates compliance monitoring through product lifecycle
relationships tracking

7/16
LightRAG: Technical Framework
LightRAG is an innovative framework designed to be a simple, fast, and cost-effective alternative to more complex
RAG systems. It incorporates lightweight graph structures into the text indexing and retrieval process, optimizing for
efficiency without sacrificing contextual awareness.

User Query LightRAG Knowledge Base LLM Response

Graph-Enhanced Text Indexing Dual-Level Retrieval System Incremental Update Algorithm

Constructs a knowledge graph from the text Employes a two-tiered retrieval process. Low- Designed for dynamic environments, featuring
corpus and integrates it with vector level retrieval targets exact matches for an incremental update mechanism that
representations to facilitate efficient retrieval. entities and relations, while high-level retrieval efficiently integrates new data by unioning it
This lightweight graph structure enables explores broader thematic connections and with the existing graph. This reduces update
contextual understanding without the multi-hop neighbors to gather rich context. time by approximately 50% compared to
complexity of full knowledge graphs. traditional methods.

Dual-Level Retrieval Process

Low-Level Retrieval High-Level Retrieval Augmented Context

Explores broader thematic connections and multi-hop
Targets exact matches for entities and relations Rich, multi-faceted information for the LLM
neighbors
Precise entity matching Comprehensive context
Thematic neighborhood expansion
Direct relationship lookup Enhanced understanding
Contextual connection discovery

8/16
LightRAG: Performance Benefits

Query Latency Improvement Update-Related Costs Reduction

Standard RAG ~120ms Standard RAG 100%

LightRAG ~80ms LightRAG 50%

30% reduction in query latency 50% reduction in update-related costs

Efficiency Cost-Effectiveness Mobile & Resource-Constrained

LightRAG significantly reduces query latency by By optimizing API calls and token processing, Well-suited for mobile environments or other
about 30%, achieving response times of around LightRAG offers a more affordable solution, cost-sensitive deployments where a balance
80ms versus 120ms for standard RAG. especially for handling data updates. between performance and resource
consumption is crucial.

Ideal Application Scenario

LightRAG is particularly well-suited for building efficient Q&A systems and for use in mobile environments or other cost-sensitive deployments
where a balance between performance and resource consumption is crucial.

9/16
Agentic RAG: Dynamic Intelligence
Agentic RAG introduces a paradigm shift by integrating autonomous AI agents into the RAG pipeline. This transforms
the LLM from a passive generator into an active participant that can reason, plan, and use tools to conduct a more
dynamic and iterative retrieval process.

Routing Agent Vector Search

LLM Agent Hub

Query Planning Agent Graph Database

AI Agent Integration Dynamic Planning & Tool Use

Re-Act Agent External API
Embeds autonomous agents that can perceive their environment, make Agents can decompose complex queries into multiple sub-queries and
decisions, and take actions. These include routing agents, query planning decide which tools to use for each, such as vector search, graph database
agents, and Re-Act (Reasoning and Action) agents. querying, or external API calls.

Adaptive Retrieval Multi-Agent Frameworks

Unlike standard RAG's fixed retrieval strategy, agents can adapt their For complex tasks, multiple specialized agents collaborate. A planning
approach based on query context and gathered information. They learn agent creates strategy, execution agents carry out steps, and a final agent
from past interactions to improve future performance. synthesizes results.

Key Advantages of Agentic RAG

Deep adaptive reasoning capabilities Strategic planning for complex queries Dynamic decision-making during retrieval

Context-aware responses Adaptive learning from interactions Integration with diverse data sources

10/16
Agentic RAG: Implementation & Frameworks
Agentic RAG Framework Technical Implementation

AI Agent Integration
Embeds autonomous agents that can perceive their environment, make
decisions, and take actions. Includes routing agents, query planning agents,
and Re-Act (Reasoning and Action) agents.

Routing Query
Agent Planning
Dynamic Planning and Tool Use
Agents decompose complex user queries into multiple sub-queries and
decide which tools to use for each, such as vector search, graph database
queries, or external APIs.

LLM
Core Model Adaptive Retrieval
Unlike standard RAG's fixed retrieval strategy, agents adapt their approach
based on query context and information gathered during retrieval. They
Tool
Re-Act learn from past interactions to improve future performance.
Using

Multi-Agent Frameworks
For complex tasks, multiple specialized agents collaborate. A planning agent
creates strategy, execution agents carry out steps, and a final agent
Knowledge Base Search API External APIs
synthesizes results.

11/16
Agentic RAG: Application Scenarios
Agentic RAG excels in complex, dynamic tasks requiring adaptability and autonomous decision-making. Its ability to break down
queries, plan retrieval strategies, and learn from interactions makes it ideal for the following real-world applications:

Advanced Customer Support Business Intelligence

Agents adapt responses to specific customer issues Automate retrieval and analysis of Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs)
Proactively offer solutions based on context
Query multiple internal databases and external sources
Learn from interactions to provide personalized experiences
Generate comprehensive reports with insights
Coordinate between multiple support resources
Adapt analysis based on changing business priorities

Scientific Research Internal Knowledge Management

Help researchers identify relevant studies Streamline access to crucial information within organizations

Extract key findings from diverse sources Intelligently navigate different data silos
Synthesize information to answer complex research Contextually understand employee queries
questions
Connect information across departments and systems
Track down citations and research connections

Key Advantage: Agentic RAG's autonomous agents can break down complex queries, decide which sources to query, and refine queries based on initial
results, leading to more accurate and context-aware responses.

12/16
Technical Comparison of RAG Variants
RAG variants differ in their core mechanisms, data representation, contextual understanding, and reasoning capabilities.

Comparison
Category Standard RAG GraphRAG LightRAG Agentic RAG

Retrieves information from an Integrates knowledge graphs Incorporates graph structures Embeds autonomous AI
external knowledge base to to leverage structured into text indexing and agents for dynamic reasoning,
Core Mechanism
augment the LLM prompt. knowledge and relationships employs a dual-level retrieval planning, and tool utilization.
for retrieval. system.

Primarily uses flat data Relies on knowledge graphs Utilizes graph-enhanced text Accesses diverse data
Data Representation representations and vector composed of nodes, edges, indexing combined with sources, external tools, and
databases. and defined relationships. vector representations. dynamic data streams.

Limited, based mainly on Enhanced, as it captures the Enhanced through the Deep and adaptive,
Contextual semantic similarity scores relationships and associated merging of neighboring considering user intent, real-
Understanding between the query and data information between data subgraphs, enabling coherent time context, and external
chunks. entities. multi-hop reasoning. feedback.

Basic, often struggling with Enables multi-hop reasoning Supports coherent multi-hop Facilitates advanced, multi-
complex, multi-faceted by traversing the knowledge reasoning for comprehensive step reasoning, strategic
Reasoning Capabilities
queries. graph, effectively handling answers. planning, and dynamic
complex queries. decision-making.

Key Insight: The evolution from Standard RAG to Agentic RAG represents increasing sophistication in how information is represented, retrieved, and leveraged
for generating context-aware responses.

13/16
Performance Metrics Comparison

Accuracy Efficiency Scalability

GraphRAG shows up to 3x improvement in LLM LightRAG reduces query latency by ~30% (from GraphRAG's scalability is hindered by the
response accuracy with scores as high as ~120ms to ~80ms) and cuts update costs by complexity of managing large-scale knowledge
86.31% on the RobustQA benchmark. ~50%. GraphRAG has higher latency but graphs. LightRAG is designed for dynamic
optimized for complex reasoning. environments with its incremental update
Standard RAG Basic algorithm.
Latency (ms) Cost Reduction
Standard RAG ~100ms Standard RAG Base Standard RAG
GraphRAG High (86.31%) Basic scalability, faces challenges as data
volume grows

GraphRAG ~150ms* GraphRAG Higher**

LightRAG Significant Improvement GraphRAG
Hindered by complexity of managing large-scale
knowledge graphs
LightRAG ~80ms LightRAG -50%
Agentic RAG Context-Adaptive
LightRAG
More scalable with incremental update
*Higher latency due to graph traversal complexity
algorithm
**Higher cost due to graph construction and
maintenance
Agentic RAG
Inherently modular, easier scaling by adding
new agents

Key Takeaway: Performance requirements should guide RAG variant selection: use GraphRAG for complex reasoning, LightRAG for efficiency, and Agentic RAG
for adaptive, scalable workloads.

14/16
Use Case Selection Guide

Standard RAG Graph RAG Light RAG Agentic RAG

Standard RAG Graph RAG Light RAG Agentic RAG

Best for straightforward Ideal for domains requiring deep Shines when a balance of Best for complex tasks requiring
applications where basic relational understanding and multi- performance, efficiency, and cost adaptability, planning, and multi-
information retrieval is sufficient. hop reasoning. is paramount. tool interaction.

General Q&A systems Finance (fraud detection) Mobile environments Advanced customer support
Simple chatbots Healthcare (drug discovery) Cost-sensitive deployments Automated business intelligence
Basic document search Legal (case law analysis) General-purpose Q&A systems Scientific research assistance

Key Selection Factors Trade-off Considerations Implementation Guidance

Application Requirements: Consider the Standard vs. Graph: Simplicity vs. deep Start Simple: Begin with standard RAG and
complexity of queries and the domain reasoning capabilities evolve to more complex variants as needed
knowledge needed
Standard vs. Light: Functionality vs. Domain-Specific: Align RAG variant with the
Performance Needs: Evaluate latency efficiency and cost specific industry use case
requirements, computational resources, and
Graph vs. Agentic: Structured knowledge vs. Iterative Approach: Test, evaluate, and refine
cost constraints
adaptive reasoning your approach based on real-world
Scalability Requirements: Consider data performance
Light vs. Agentic: Cost-effectiveness vs.
volume growth and system responsiveness
dynamic capabilities Hybrid Solutions: Consider combining RAG
needs
variants for complex applications
Budget Constraints: Weigh investment in
infrastructure versus desired capabilities

15/16
Future Directions & Conclusion

Standard RAG Graph RAG Light RAG Agentic RAG Future

Standard RAG Graph RAG Light RAG Agentic RAG

Simple and effective for Provides deep contextual Balances efficiency and cost- Introduces dynamic reasoning and
straightforward applications where understanding through structured effectiveness with performance, adaptability for complex tasks,
primary need is grounding LLM knowledge graphs, ideal for optimal for mobile environments best for applications requiring
responses in up-to-date complex queries and multi-hop and cost-sensitive deployments. planning and tool use.
information. reasoning.

Significance for Building Powerful AI Systems

Trust & Reliability Specialized Applications
RAG variants provide different approaches to building trustworthy AI Each RAG variant offers unique advantages for specific use cases, from
systems by grounding outputs in external knowledge and reducing straightforward Q&A to complex reasoning tasks.
hallucinations.

Balanced Approaches Future Innovation

Organizations can select the most appropriate RAG approach based on Continued evolution of RAG technology will likely lead to more
their specific needs, balancing factors like performance, cost, and sophisticated hybrid approaches that combine the strengths of multiple
complexity. variants.

"The evolution from standard RAG to more sophisticated variants marks a significant advancement in building more
powerful, trustworthy, and context-aware AI systems capable of tackling complex, real-world challenges."
16/16