Poetry Notes (ENGL101 - 2025)
Poetry Notes (ENGL101 - 2025)
Poetry Notes
ENGL101 – 2025
What is poetry?
According to William Wordsworth (1772-1834):
“Poetry is the spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings […] recollected in tranquillity.”
“spontaneous overflow”: Wordsworth believed poetry is a natural flow of strong feelings. He thought writing poetry allows your free
feelings and emotions to spill out onto the page.
“recollected in tranquillity”: Wordsworth believed that poets undergo a period of tranquillity after being consumed by strong emotions. He
also emphasised the role of personal emotion in poetry.
***
These definitions of poetry illustrate that poetry is a multifaceted art form. It captures emotions, thoughts, and
experiences in a manner that resonates deeply with both the poet and the reader.
The three main literary genres that the ENGL101 module introduces you to are:
1. Poetry,
2. Prose, and
3. Drama.
You have already encountered the first category; now it is time to learn about poetry. This section of the module aims to teach you about some of
the key concepts and terms involved in reading poetry so that you can clearly comprehend and interpret the poems.
Refer back to the quotes on page 2. What images and feelings do these quotes evoke? These quotes tell us that poetry is meant to engage the
listener's and reader's imagination. Poetry is different from prose because many devices are used to create meaning, evoke emotions and provoke
thought. For example, unlike prose, where meaning is often direct, poetry urges the reader to engage actively with it. It also uses imagery, figures
of speech, sound effects, mood, and tone to convey the meaning.
Think about how language is open to interpretation. Simple phrases we use daily, like “I am fine” and “thank you,” can have different meanings
depending on the context, the speaker’s tone, and what words are stressed when they are being delivered. Therefore, poems can also have many
interpretations. What one reader finds may be different from what another reader understands. Although poems are open to interpretation, it does
not many all interpretations are acceptable. An interpretation can only be accepted when there is substantial evidence from the poem that supports
it. This is why it is important to read the poem more than once.
Although poetry allows for multiple interpretations, there are still guidelines one must follow when analysing a poem:
- Think about what the poem is saying.
- Explain how the poem creates and conveys meaning. To identify this, look at the word choice, structure, sound and imagery.
- Support the statements you make with textual evidence. Providing textual evidence that supports your claims ensures that you do not write
vague statements; instead, point to specific lines, words or literary techniques you see in the poem.
If analysing poetry still feels daunting, follow these guidelines to help you:
1. Title: The title of a poem often provides insight into its themes and subject matter.
2. Unusual Language: Poets are very intentional with their writing. If a word seems out of place, consider why the poet used it.
3. Imagery: Look for figurative language (similes, metaphors, personification) to create vivid images in the reader or listener's mind.
4. Repetition: Are there any repeated lines or phrases? If there are, why are they repeated?
5. Sound Devices: Pay attention to rhyme, rhythm, alliteration, assonance, and onomatopoeia. How do these devices contribute to the
overall meaning of the poem?
6. Contrast and Irony: Are any ideas being compared? What ideas are being subverted? What effect does this have on the poem's overall
meaning?
Example: “Hope is the thing with feathers” compares “hope” to a bird. Notice the difference? Here, it is not stated that hope is like a bird.
Instead, hope is a bird, which suggests that it exists in the soul and never stops [Emily Dickinson].
Metaphors are powerful literary devices because they encourage the reader to look beyond the literal meaning. Metaphors often carry more
profound symbolic interpretations.
Courtly Love
Courtly love (known in Old French as fin’amor) was a medieval European literary and cultural phenomenon that emerged in the 12th
century, primarily within aristocratic courts.
Courtly love was a highly idealised and codified form of romantic love, often exploring themes of unrequited love and centred on the
admiration of a noble lady by a devoted lover, usually a poet or knight, longing for her – a woman of higher status who forever remains out
of his reach.
The male poet-lover would praise his beloved extravagantly. In his poem, he would claim to be suffering greatly due to his love for the
noblewoman and begs her to return his affections or show some sort of favour for him.
This concept was widely depicted in poetry, literature, and courtly life, shaping European ideas of love and romance for centuries.
The sonnet became the preferred form of expressing this kind of devotion, portraying the beloved as an idealised, almost spiritual figure.
The Italian poet Petrarch’s sonnets are some of the most well-known examples of this tradition. We will look at his poem titled “Laura.”
The male lover expresses his devotion through extravagant praise, comparing her beauty and virtue to celestial or natural elements like the sun,
stars, angels, or flowers. The blazon [an extended metaphor] often achieves this by detailing her physical attributes as symbols of purity and moral
perfection. The admirer’s life is filled with suffering as he experiences deep emotional turmoil, unfulfilled longing, and even physical decline. He
praises her endlessly, pleads for her affection, and when ignored, blames himself for the hopelessness of his love. Nevertheless, he still continues.
Secrecy plays a crucial role, as this love is typically forbidden. The admirer passes secret messages, many stolen glances are exchanged between
the admirer and the beloved, and secret meetings intensify the romance, thus making it even more dramatic and unattainable. The knight/lover
serves his lady in the same way he would serve his lord, continuously proving his endless devotion through heroic deeds or noble acts. She may
return his devotion with a small token or a favour, but oftentimes, she remains distant and emotionally inaccessible.
Courtly love is ultimately seen as a transformative force. The devotion of the admirer becomes the key defining point of his character. Even though
he spends all his efforts on his unattainable noblewoman, the love is doomed. This narrative is found in many courtly love narratives.
As you read through these notes, you will encounter two words that may be unfamiliar:
1. Blazon, and
2. Contreblazon.
What do these two words mean?
1. The Blazon
The blazon is a poetic device used in Courtly Love poetry that describes and praises the physical features of an idealised and unattainable woman
in an exaggerated manner. It is commonly found in Petrarchan sonnets. The structure of a blazon moves in order through a woman’s physical
attributes. It will begin by describing her eyes, lips, cheeks, hair, and feet, all the while comparing them to nature or granting them celestial qualities.
For example:
In line 3 of Petrarch’s poem, Laura, the speaker’s beloved is described as having “eyes [that are] brighter than the radiant west.” This is a vivid
metaphor which compares the woman’s eyes to a beautiful sunset. The speaker is saying that her beautiful eyes can be compared to the radiant
evening sky.
2. The Contreblazon
The contreblazon is a subversive response to the Petrarchan sonnet's unrealistic and unattainable beauty standards. In other words, it parodies the
traditional blazon. In the contreblazon, the speaker does not idealise his beloved; instead, he undermines/critiques her features. What you will find
in the contreblazon are exaggerated comparisons that mock the over-the-top romantic comparisons found in the blazon.
For example:
In line 1 of Shakespeare’s sonnet, My Mistress’ Eyes Are Nothing Like the Sun, the speaker begins by immediately rejecting the conventions of
blazon poetry and states that his “mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun.” He does not compare her eyes to “the radiant west” like the speaker in
Petrarch’s poem. This immediate rejection sets the tone for the rest of the poem. Instead of describing his beloved in an unrealistic way, the speaker
presents his beloved as an ordinary woman. Although the woman is not described as a divine being with untouchable beauty, the speaker is sincere
in his expression of love.
Therefore, in Courtly Love Poetry, the blazon presents the unattainable woman, while the contreblazon critiques these unrealistic beauty standards
and ideals, leading to more realistic depictions of love and beauty.
- THE SONNET -
STRUCTURE AND CHARACTERISTICS
A sonnet is a 14-line poem traditionally written in iambic pentameter [a rhythmic pattern of stressed and unstressed syllables that is used in poetry
and verse drama] with a fixed rhyme scheme. While classical sonnets conform to strict structural rules, modern poets often experiment with form,
maintaining the 14-line framework while breaking away from the traditional rhyme scheme.
What seems to remain common in all sonnets is a personal voice, themes of deep emotion, and a structured argument.
Like all lyric poetry, a sonnet is an intimate expression of personal thought and emotion. The speaker shares deep and emotional inner reflections
and thoughts, giving the reader the role of a secret confidant.
Sonnets explore deep feelings like love, loss, grief, and longing. In addition to these raw emotions, the speaker also engages in intellectual
exploration.
Sonnets are defined by a key characteristic: their ability to present and develop an argument. The poem progresses logically, moving from a problem
to a resolution, a question to an answer, or a thought to a revelation.
Although the sonnet has undergone many changes over the centuries, it still remains a very powerful poetic tool as it balances emotion and intellect.
It compresses deep feelings into a compact yet structured space, making it both a lyrical confession and a compelling argument.
The descriptions provided for Laura’s beauty are celestial. She is described as having golden hair, bright eyes, and divine grace. She, therefore, has
an almost angelic presence. She is pure and untouched.
Similarly to courtly love poets, Petrarch expresses his torment through emotional poetry by describing his pain in great detail. He longs for her yet
cannot have her.
Petrarch sees his love as a refining force that elevates his soul, making him a better poet and a more virtuous man.
Unattainable Love
Idealised Beauty
The Suffering Lover
Love as a Source of Spiritual Transformation
“Laura”
By Francesco Petrarch (1304-1374)
(Translated by Morris Bishop)
***
Laura is the perfect example of a courtly love poem because it embraces the idea of a distant, noble and unattainable
woman. This woman inspires the admirer to express his suffering, undying devotion and admiration.
Ntando Mazibuko 2025
15
Shakespeare’s
‘My Mistress’ Eyes Are Nothing Like the Sun’
& the Rejection of Courtly Love
As Renaissance ideals gradually took over from medieval beliefs, many poets began to challenge or satirise the conventions of courtly love. One
such poet is William Shakespeare.
William Shakespeare’s Sonnet 130: My Mistress’ Eyes Are Nothing Like the Sun, is a satirical take on courtly love poetry. It is satirical because it
directly challenges its exaggerated and unrealistic conventions.
Unlike the poem Laura by Petrarch, Shakespeare’s poem does not place the woman on an unrealistic pedestal. It instead portrays a realistic image
of the speaker’s mistress. Therefore, Shakespeare’s poem subverts the traditional love tropes.
In Shakespeare’s poem, the speaker contradicts typical courtly love metaphors. For example, the speaker does not compare her eyes to the sun, nor
does he compare her lips to red coral.
Instead of describing her hair as golden, her hair is black wires.
He even goes as far as saying that her breath is not sweet or perfumed like roses. Therefore, he contrasts the usual poetic idealisation.
Therefore, this rejection of the conventional courtly love traditions makes Shakespeare’s sonnet a contreblazon (an anti-blazon). In Sonnet
130: My Mistress’ Eyes Are Nothing Like the Sun, Shakespeare reverses and parodies [imitates in order to satirise] the unrealistic
comparisons used in the blazon. Have a look at Petrarch’s descriptions of his beloved and Shakespeare’s descriptions. How are they
different? Which one seems more realistic to you?
Unlike the seriousness of traditional poetic comparisons, Shakespeare’s poem has a playful and mocking tone.
Rather than compare his mistress to a celestial being, he plainly states that she stomps the ground when she walks.
Although he rejects the conventional beauty standards, his love is affirmed. He states that his woman is just as rare as any woman falsely compared
to celestial objects.
Although Shakespeare’s woman is not perfect, he loves her for who she is. Therefore, love is grounded in reality.
After you have looked at Shakespeare’s poem, ask yourself what he is trying to say.
Conventional courtly love places women on pedestals, turns them into goddesses, and objectifies them by merely focusing on their physical
attributes. In Shakespeare’s sonnet, his woman is not unobtainable and a celestial being. Notice how he states that she treads on the ground.
The descriptions he provides of his woman are grounded in reality. He is not saying that the women in other traditional courtly love poetry
are more beautiful than his woman; he just refuses to use unrealistic exaggerations about her beauty. Thus, one can argue that his love for
her is more sincere as it is grounded in truth and reality.
The turn in Shakespeare’s poem takes place in the last two lines:
“And yet”: here, Shakespeare introduces the change (line 13).
“by heaven”: this is an ironic exclamation. In traditional courtly love poetry, the woman is often compared to a celestial being. Therefore,
Shakespeare is mocking this while simultaneously expressing his genuine sincerity.
Comparing Petrarch’s Laura and Shakespeare’s Sonnet 130: My Mistress’ Eyes Are Nothing Like the Sun.
Tone
Purpose
Emotional Impact
Courtly love’s legacy can still be seen today in art, culture, and social interactions. Most notably, it has shaped our ideas of “courtesy,” “chivalry,”
and traditional gender roles. For instance, in many societies, there is still the belief that men should be the ones to pursue while women remain
passive or subtly influential actively. Petrarch’s poem, Laura, embodies this tradition as it idealises the distant and unattainable woman, her physical
and celestial beauty, and the suffering of the devoted suitor. However, Shakespeare’s Sonnet challenges courtly love traditions by describing an
honest love filled with humour and free of unrealistic beauty ideals. His approach is satirical: it critiques the over-the-top nature of courtly love
poetry and instead celebrates a love based on reality rather than unattainable perfection.