27-06-2024
Edificio Tamango
Agenda
• Overview
• Structural project
• Future development
• Engineerign team
• Q&A
1
27-06-2024
Tamango Project
• The Project will be located in Coyhaique
district, Aysen
• The first 12-story building in the district
• First hybrid building in Chile and LATAM
Tamango Project: Stage 0
2
27-06-2024
Tamango Project
La madera de ingeniería: tiene la gran ventaja en velocidad de Montaje .Con lo cual se Elevación Eje F
consiguen menos tiempo de construcción. Con menores gastos generales. Baja huella de
carbono y un gran desempeño térmico.
Trabaja principalmente gravitacionalmente.
Tutores : Le proporciona la estabilidad para el diseño sísmico y permite poder cumplir
con la Norma Chilena NCh 433 “Diseño Sísmico de Edificios”
Tamango Project: Stage 1
3
27-06-2024
Tamango Project
Project: Stage 1
Story 3-9
Total floor area x level: 1.017,5m2
Residential floor area: 883,4m2
General floor area: 134,2m2
Tamango Project
Project: Stage 1
4
27-06-2024
Tamango Project
Project: Stage 1
Tamango Project
Project: Stage 1
10
10
5
27-06-2024
Tamango Project
Project: Stage 1
11
11
Project: Stage 1
Tamango Project
UNIT TYPE 1
TOTAL area x level: 120,3m2
12
12
6
27-06-2024
Tamango Project
Project: Stage 1
UNIT TYPE 2
TOTAL area x level: 110,4m2
13
13
Tamango Project: Structural Analysis
SOBRE CARGAS:
• Uso General 200kg/m2
• Balcon 400 kg/m2
• Pasillo 500 kg/m2
PESOS:
• Peso Propio 4 2 1 2 To n
• Densidad 665 kg/m2
• SC 1 5 2 0 To n
1 8 0 1 2 8 1 4 0 SO LICITACIO N ES SISMICAS
k g / m 2 k g / m 2 k g / m 2
• C max = 0,216
• Peso Sismico (25%) = 4592
To n
• Qo = 9 9 1 To n
3 1 0
k g / m 2
14
14
7
27-06-2024
Tamango Project: Structural Analysis
4 kPa
2 kPa
5 kPa
15
15
Tamango Project: The gravity system
was structured as column, beam &
platform
Source: www.canadianarchitect.com 16
Source: Stora Enso Design Manual
16
8
27-06-2024
Tamango Project: Structural Analysis
Seismic Zone: 1
Soil Type: C
R: 7 The lateral
Ro: 11 system
I: 1 considers
concrete walls
Qmin: 0,035*I*P
Qmax: 0,0735*I*P
P = DL + LL
17
Source: NCh433
17
Tamango Project: Modal Analysis
18
18
9
27-06-2024
Evaluation of some variation in the concrete core
The architect team aims to:
• Eliminate some shear wall in Y direction
• Allow us to increase the thickness of the remained walls up to 300 [mm]
23
23
Evaluation of some variation in the concrete core
The architect team aims to:
• Eliminate some shear wall in Y direction
• Allow us to increase the thickness of the remained walls up to 300 [mm]
24
24
10
27-06-2024
Evaluation of the diagonal system on the facade
25
25
Evaluation of the diagonal system on the facade
26
26
11
27-06-2024
Evaluation of the diagonal system on the facade
27
27
Tamango Project: Stage 2
28
28
12
27-06-2024
How was the diaphragm structured?
29
29
Tamango Project: Stage 3
34
34
13
27-06-2024
Tamango Project: Modal Analysis
35
35
Tamango Project: Modal Analysis
36
36
14
27-06-2024
Uno de los desafíos de nuestro Edificio Tamango : Calcular Edificio de altura en Maderas ,con balcones en uno de los países
más sísmico del planeta.
Ejemplos Edificios Internacionales de altura en Maderas ,sin balcones o con balcones menores
Wood Innovation and Design Centre Brock Commons,Canada 39
39
Evaluation of TCC slab
Design criteria
• TCC = 170 [mm] CLT + 100 [mm] H.A (vibration is controlling the desing)
• The long term limit deflection at the cantilever elements should be L/300
= 4[ ]
= 2[ ]
= 100
40
40
15
27-06-2024
Evaluation of TCC slab: Case # 3 L = 1.5 [m]
• According to NCh1537 Of 2009 section 7, the railing of a balcony should include a point load of 0.9 [kN] at the less favourable
point. Moreover, a linear load of 0.5 [kN/m] must be applied in the vertical/horizontal direction.
45
45
Evaluation of gravity system connections:
• Typical beam to column connection (fire exposed)
47
47
16
27-06-2024
Evaluation of gravity system connections:
• Typical beam to column connection (fire exposed)
Carrying
member
Carried
member
Source: CBH design manual – Simpson Strong-Tie 48
48
Evaluation of gravity system connections:
• Typical beam to column connection (fire exposed)
Gap
CBH
Source: CBH design manual – Simpson Strong-Tie
50
50
17
27-06-2024
Evaluation of gravity system connections:
• Typical beam to column connection (fire exposed)
Source: CBH design manual – Simpson Strong-Tie
51
51
Fire Evaluation of Beams, Columns & Slabs:
52
52
18
27-06-2024
Fire Evaluation of Beams, Columns & Slabs:
53
53
Fire Evaluation of Beams, Columns & Slabs:
Charring Depth:
CLT slab + 3 type RF GWB = 42[mm]
CLT wall + 2 type RF GWB = 43 [mm]
LVL columna + 2 type RF GWB =
45[mm]/97[mm]
LVL beams = under evaluation
Source: EC5 54
54
19
27-06-2024
Fire Evaluation of Beams, Columns & Slabs:
Source: TR10, AWC
55
55
Fire Evaluation of Beams, Columns & Slabs:
Source: CBH Design manual
56
56
20
27-06-2024
Columns:
Tamango
Source: Pillar - Design manual/Rothoblass 57
Zapatos
57
Columns:
58
58
21
27-06-2024
Long-term vertical deformation:
Source: Jockwer et al. 2021 59
59
Long-term vertical deformation:
60
60
22
27-06-2024
Long-term vertical deformation:
62
62
Long-term vertical deformation:
63
63
23
27-06-2024
Long-term vertical deformation:
64
64
Progresive collapse:
65
Source: Mpidi et al. 2020/2021/2022
65
24
27-06-2024
Progresive collapse:
66
Source: Mpidi et al. 2020/2021/2022
66
Progresive collapse:
67
Source: Mpidi et al. 2020/2021/2022
67
25
27-06-2024
Progresive collapse:
68
Source: Mpidi et al. 2020/2021/2022
68
Progresive collapse:
69
Source: Mpidi et al. 2020/2021/2022
69
26
27-06-2024
Engineering Team:
Patricio Bertholet Jorge Romeros Diego Valdivieso Valentino Reveco Mario Wagner
Sebastián Cárcamo
Veronica Ugarte Rodrigo Aravena Marcial Salaverry Peter Dechent Gian Carlo Giuliano Juan Acevedo
70
70
Q&A
71
71
27
