Analysis of Root Canal Curvature and Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Guizhou, China
Analysis of Root Canal Curvature and Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Guizhou, China
e-ISSN 1643-3750
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.928758
Received:
Accepted:
2020.09.23
2020.10.29 Analysis of Root Canal Curvature and Root Canal
Available online:
Published:
2020.11.14
2021.01.13 Morphology of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in
Guizhou, China
Authors’ Contribution: CDEF 1,2,3 Xin Qiao 1 Department of Endodontics, Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical
Study Design A BC 4 Tingting Xu University, Chongqing, P.R. China
Data Collection B 2 Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing,
Statistical Analysis C D 1,2,3 Liang Chen P.R. China
Data Interpretation D AG 1,2,3 Deqin Yang 3 Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher
Manuscript Preparation E Education, Chongqing, P.R. China
Literature Search F 4 Hospital/School of Stomatology, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou,
Funds Collection G P.R. China
Background: We investigated the root canal curvature and morphology of maxillary posterior teeth in Guizhou, China, to
provide references for clinical practice.
Material/Methods: We collected 274 maxillary posterior teeth in Guizhou Province, China. The root canal curvature was observed
by X-ray film measurement. Two hundred teeth were selected to make transparent tooth models, and root ca-
nal configuration was recorded according to Vertucci classification criteria. The position of the MB2 root canal
orifice and the mesiobuccal root canal configuration were observed by micro-computed tomographic (micro-
CT) scanning. The t test and the chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.
Results: The root canals of the maxillary posterior teeth showed more significant curvature in the mesiodistal direction
than in the buccolingual direction (P<0.05). The MB2 root canal of maxillary molars showed severe bending in
the mesiodistal direction: 25.16±6.6 degrees and 28.05±8.65 degrees in first and second molars, respective-
ly. The detection rate of MB2 was 48% in maxillary first molars and 32% in maxillary second molars. The re-
sults of micro-CT showed that the vertical distances between the MB2 and MB-P line were 0.64±0.34 mm and
0.57±0.28 mm in first and second molars, respectively.
Conclusions: The root canal morphology and curvature of maxillary posterior teeth varied greatly in the Guizhou population,
which increases the difficulty of treatment. It is necessary for clinicians to gain understanding of the root ca-
nal and to improve the success rate of root canal therapy.
MeSH Keywords: Dental Pulp Cavity • Root Canal Therapy • Tooth Root • X-Ray Microtomography
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-1 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
CLINICAL RESEARCH Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-2 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
CLINICAL RESEARCH
below the ball tube mouth of the Kodak 2100 integrated X-ray
system (Kodak, Rochester, New York, USA), and the mesiodis-
tal (form mesial to distal) and buccolingual (from buccal to lin-
gual) areas were photographed for the same tooth. Under the
condition of 60 kV, 7 Ma, and 0.16 s, the obtained X-ray den-
tal film was saved as a digital image, and then it was import-
ed into the electronic measuring ruler software (CASS, SOUTH
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, Guangzhou, China) to mea-
sure the root canal curvature of the maxillary posterior teeth.
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-3 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
CLINICAL RESEARCH Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
Type I (1) Type II (2–1) Type III (1–2–1) Type IV (2) Type V (1–2) Type VI (2–1–2) Type V0I (1–2–1–2) Type VIII (3)
Figure 2. Illustration showing the categories of root canal morphologies in human permanent teeth according to the method by
Vertucci.
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-4 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
CLINICAL RESEARCH
Single root
4 8 0 16.91 5.72±5.19 5 7 0 16.33 7.18±4.70 –0.723 0.477
canal (12)
Single root
3 20 2 31.96 9.19±5.72 4 20 1 22.21 10.35±6.59 –0.665 0.509
canal (25)
P – palatal root canal; MB – mesiobuccal root canal; MB2 – the second mesiobuccal root canal; DB – distobuccal root canal.
of maxillary molars showed significant differences in mesiodis- Figure 4 shows the types of root canal curvature in different
tal and buccolingual directions (P<0.01). According to our re- tooth positions and different projection directions.
sults, the root canals of the maxillary posterior teeth showed
a greater curvature in the mesiodistal direction than in the Observation of root canal morphology by transparent
buccolingual direction, and the MB and MB2 of maxillary first tooth method
molars and MB2 of maxillary second molars showed severe
bending (more than 20 degrees) in the mesiodistal direction The representative types of root canals observed by the
(20.84±7.16 degrees, 25.16±6.6 degrees, and 28.05±8.65 de- transparent tooth method are shown in Figure 5. In the first
grees, respectively). All root canals of maxillary posterior teeth premolar, the detection rate of type IV root canal was the
showed moderate curvature (more than 5 degrees and less highest, accounting for 44%, followed by type II root canal,
than 20 degrees) in the buccolingual direction, while palatal accounting for 26%. In the second premolar, the detection
roots showed slight bending in mesiodistal directions, i.e., a rate of type I root canals was the highest (44%), followed
straight root canal (less than 5 degree) (Table 2). by type II and type IV root canals (28% and 22%). The re-
sults showed that the detection rate of MB2 (type II, IV, and
VI) in maxillary first molars was 48%, while it was 32% in
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-5 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
CLINICAL RESEARCH Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
A B C
D E
F G
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-6 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
CLINICAL RESEARCH
H I J
Figure 4. Representation of root canal curvature in different tooth positions and different observation directions. (A–C) Buccolingual
direction of premolar (A) straight root canal (category I). (B) Moderately curved root canal (category II). (C) Severely curved
root canal (category III). (D, E) Mesiodistal direction of premolar. (D) Straight root canal (category I) and severely curved root
canal (category III). (E) Moderately curved root canal (category II). (F, G) Buccolingual direction of molar. (F) Straight root canal
(category I) and severely curved root canal (category III). (G) Moderately curved root canal (category II). (H–J) Mesiodistal
direction of molar. (H) Straight root canal (category I). (I) Moderately curved root canal (category II). (J) Severely curved root
canal (category III).
A B C D
E F G H
Figure 5. Representation of root canal types observed by transparent tooth method (A) Type I (1-1 double roots) (B) type I (1-1 single
root) (C) type II (2-1) (D) type III (1-2-1) (E) Type IV (2-2) (F) type V (1-2) (G) type VI (2-1-2) (H) type VII (1-2-1-2).
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-7 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
CLINICAL RESEARCH Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
Table 3. Distribution of main root canal configuration of 200 maxillary posterior teeth (n %).
Type I Type II Type III Type IV Type V Type VI Type VII Type VIII
Tooth position Number
(n %) (n %) (n %) (n %) (n %) (n %) (n %) (n %)
First premolar 50 6 (12%) 13 (26%) 4 (6%) 22 (44%) 3 (6%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%)
Second premolar 50 22 (44%) 14 (28%) 0 (0%) 11 (22%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
MB root of the
50 14 (28%) 6 (12%) 5 (10%) 16 (32%) 7 (14%) 2 (4%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
First molar
MB root of the
50 24 (48%) 5 (10%) 7 (14%) 9 (18%) 2 (4%) 2 (4%) 0 (0%) 1 (2%)
Second molar
Table 5. Comparison of MB2 detection rate by micro-CT and tooth transparent method.
The maxillary
10 21 47.62% 24 50 48% 0.001 0.592
first molar
The maxillary
8 21 38.10% 16 50 32% 0.246 0.408
second molar
maxillary second molars. The proportion of type I root ca- The representative root canal morphology observed by micro-
nal in the mesiobuccal root of the second permanent mo- CT of the first and second maxillary molars mesiobuccal root is
lars was highest, accounting for 48%. The detailed classifi- shown in Figure 6. According to the Vertucci method, the inci-
cation of root canal configuration in different tooth positions dences of MB2 were 47.62% and 38.10%, respectively. When
is shown in Table 3. the allowable error is 20%, we compared the incidence of MB2
between micro-CT and transparent teeth method, and the chi-
Micro-CT observation of root canal orifice position square test showed that there were no statistically significant
differences (P>0.05) (Table 5).
MB2 orifice was found in 10 maxillary first molars and 8 max-
illary second molars. The results of micro-CT showed that all In this study, although the sample size was not large, a tooth
the MB2 orifices were located at the lingual side of the MB, with a relatively rare shape was found. The report was as fol-
and the MB2-MB distances of the first molar and the second lows: the first permanent molar of the maxillary had 2 mesio-
molar were (1.37±0.48) mm and (1.29±0.54) mm, respective- buccal roots, which were type I root canal type (Figure 6H).
ly. Most of the MB2 orifices were located at mesial position Micro-CT clearly showed that the branches of the root ca-
of the line of MB-P, but in 1 case, the MB2 orifices were lo- nal were complex and highly variable, especially in 1/3 of the
cated at the distal position. In maxillary first molars and sec- apex (Figure 6).
ond molars, the vertical distances between MB2 and the line
of MB-P were (0.64±0.34) mm, (0.57±0.28) mm, and the angles
between the MB-MB2 line and MB-P line were (25.18±18.32)°
and (23.31±15.86)°, respectively (Table 4).
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-8 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
CLINICAL RESEARCH
A B C D
E F G H
Figure 6. Representation root canal morphology by micro-CT (A) Type I (1-1) (B) Type II (2-1) (C) Type III (1-2-1) (D) Type IV (2-2)
(E) type V (1-2) (F) type VI (2-1-2) (G) type VII (1-2-1-2) (H) Double root of mesial buccal (1-1 root canal).
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-9 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
CLINICAL RESEARCH Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-10 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
CLINICAL RESEARCH
References:
1. Pan J, Wang J, Hao L et al: The triple functions of D2 silencing in treatment 13. Guo J, Vahidnia A, Sedghizadeh P, Enciso R: Evaluation of root and canal
of periapical disease. J Endod, 2017; 43: 272–78 morphology of maxillary permanent first molars in a North American pop-
2. Franciscatto GJ, Brennan DS, Gomes MS, Rossi-Fedele G: Association be- ulation by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod, 2014; 40: 635–39
tween pulp and periapical conditions and dental emergency visits involv- 14. Schneider SW: A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved
ing pain relief: epidemiological profile and risk indicators in private prac- root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971; 32: 271–75
tice in Australia. Int Endod J, 2020; 53: 887–94 15. Zhang X, Xu N, Wang HG et al: A Cone-beam computed tomographic study
3. Tomaszewska IM, Jarzębska A, Skinningsrud B et al: An original micro-CT of apical surgery-related morphological characteristics of the distolingual
study and meta-analysis of the internal and external anatomy of maxillary root in 3-rooted mandibular first molars in a Chinese population. J Endod,
molars-implications for endodontic treatment. Clin Anat, 2018; 31: 838–53 2017; 43: 2020–24
4. Mazzi-Chaves J, Silva-Sousa Y, Leoni G et al: Micro-computed tomograph- 16. Huang DM, Gao XJ, Tan H, Zhou XD: [Association of root canal therapy dif-
ic assessment of the variability and morphological features of root canal ficulty with canal anatomic factors in mandibular permanent incisors.] Hua
system and their ramifications. J Appl Oral Sci, 2020; 28: e20190393 Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2006; 24(4): 366–69
5. Kulkarni V, Duruel O, Ataman-Duruel E et al: In-depth morphological evalu- 17. Peters O: Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal
ation of tooth anatomic lengths with root canal configurations using cone systems: A review. J Endod, 2004; 30: 559–67
beam computed tomography in North American population. J Appl Oral Sci, 18. Gorni F, Gagliani M: The outcome of endodontic retreatment: A 2-yr fol-
2020; 28: e20190103 low-up. J Endod, 2004; 30: 1–4
6. Wu D, Hu DQ, Xin BC et al: Root canal morphology of maxillary and man- 19. Lin LM, Rosenberg PA, Lin J: Do procedural errors cause endodontic treat-
dibular first premolars analyzed using cone-beam computed tomography ment failure? J Am Dent Assoc, 2005; 136: 187–93
in a Shandong Chinese population. Medicine, 2020; 99: e20116
20. Tomaszewska I, Jarzębska A, Skinningsrud B et al: An original micro-CT
7. Martins J, Alkhawas M, Altaki Z et al: Worldwide analyses of maxillary first study and meta-analysis of the internal and external anatomy of maxillary
molar second mesiobuccal prevalence: Amulticenter cone-beam comput- molars-implications for endodontic treatment. Clin Anat, 2018; 31: 838–53
ed tomographic study. J Endod, 2018; 44: 1641–49.e1641
21. Pereria B, Martins JNR, Baruwa AO et al: Association between endodonti-
8. Fu Y, Deng Q, Xie Z et al: Coronal root canal morphology of permanent two- cally treated maxillary and mandibular molars with fused roots and peri-
rooted mandibular first molars with novel 3D measurements. Int Endod J, apical lesions: A cone-beam computed tomography cross-sectional study.
2020; 53: 167–75 J Endod, 2020; 46: 771–77
9. Hou BX: [Complications occurred in root canal mechanical preparation: the 22. Magat G, Hakbilen S: Prevalence of second canal in the mesiobuccal root
reason, prevention and management.] Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi,. of permanent maxillary molars from a Turkish subpopulation: A cone-beam
2019; 54(9): 605–11 [in Chinese] computed tomography study. Folia Morphol (Warsz.), 2019; 78: 351–58
10. Mohara NT, Coelho MS, de Queiroz NV et al: Root anatomy and canal con- 23. Kewalramani R, Murthy CS, Gupta R: The second mesiobuccal canal in
figuration of maxillary molars in a Brazilian subpopulation: A 125-mum three-rooted maxillary first molar of Karnataka Indian sub-populations: A
cone-beam computed tomographic study. Eur J Dent, 2019; 13: 82–87 cone-beam computed tomography study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 2019;
11. Buchanan GD, Gamieldien MY, Tredoux S, Vally ZI: Root and canal config- 9: 347–51
urations of maxillary premolars in a South African subpopulation using 24. Zhang Z, Sun J: [Comparative study of the diagnostic values of radio visi-
cone beam computed tomography and two classification systems. J Oral ography, cone-beam computed tomography, and transparent teeth in the
Sci, 2020; 62: 93–97 in vitro diagnosis of the first molar root canal system.] Hua Xi Kou Qiang
12. Li Y, Bao S, Yang X et al: Symmetry of root anatomy and root canal mor- Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2013; 31(5): 441–47
phology in maxillary premolars analyzed using cone-beam computed to- 25. Tzeng L, Chang M, Chang S et al: Analysis of root canal system of maxil-
mography. Arch Oral Biol, 2018; 94: 84–92 lary first and second molars and their correlations by cone beam comput-
ed tomography. J Formos Med Assoc, 2020; 119: 968–73
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-11 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]
Qiao X. et al.:
CLINICAL RESEARCH Root canal curvature and root canal morphology of maxillary posterior teeth
© Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e928758
26. Saber SEDM, Ahmed MHM, Obeid M, Ahmed HMA: Root and canal mor- 31. Martins J, Marques D, Mata A, Caramês J: Root and root canal morphology
phology of maxillary premolar teeth in an Egyptian subpopulation using of the permanent dentition in a Caucasian population: A cone-beam com-
two classification systems: A cone beam computed tomography study. Int puted tomography study. Int Endod J, 2017; 50: 1013–26
Endod J, 2019; 52: 267–78 32. Camargo Dos Santos B, Pedano M, Giraldi C et al: Mesiobuccal root canal
27. Wolf T, Kozaczek C, Siegrist M et al: An ex vivo study of root canal system morphology of maxillary first molars in a Brazilian sub-population – a mi-
configuration and morphology of 115 maxillary first premolars. J Endod, cro-CT study. Eur Endod J, 2020; 5: 105–11
2020; 46: 794–800 33. Martins J, Quaresma S, Quaresma M, Frisbie-Teel J: C-shaped maxillary per-
28. de Lima C, de Souza L, Devito K et al: Evaluation of root canal morphology manent first molar: A case report and literature review. J Endod, 2013; 39:
of maxillary premolars: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Aust 1649–53
Endod J, 2019; 45: 196–201 34. Hudieb MI, Wakabayashi N, Abu-Hammad OA et al: Biomechanical effect
29. Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y et al: Cone-beam computed tomo- of an exposed dental implant’s first thread: A three-dimensional finite el-
graphic evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars in a ement analysis study. Med Sci Monit, 2019; 25: 3933–40
Saudi population. Biomed Res Int, 2018; 2018: 8170620 35. Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Alcozer R et al: Failure load and stress analysis of
30. Pan J, Parolia A, Chuah S et al: Root canal morphology of permanent teeth orthodontic miniscrews with different transmucosal collar diameter. J Mech
in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. Behav Biomed Mater, 2018; 87: 132–37
BMC Oral Health, 2019; 19: 14 36. Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Gatti S, Gandini P: Disinclusion of unerupted
teeth by mean of self-ligating brackets: Effect of blood contamination on
shear bond strength. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2013; 18: e162–67
Indexed in: [Current Contents/Clinical Medicine] [SCI Expanded] [ISI Alerting System]
This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) e928758-12 [ISI Journals Master List] [Index Medicus/MEDLINE] [EMBASE/Excerpta Medica]
[Chemical Abstracts/CAS]