0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views8 pages

LAES

The document outlines the guidelines for stress analysis of process piping, primarily following ASME B31.3 standards. It details the analysis tools, critical lines to analyze, main load cases, and specific requirements for supports, hangers, and modeling. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of vendor data, proper load combinations, and documentation for a comprehensive stress analysis report.

Uploaded by

sarangap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views8 pages

LAES

The document outlines the guidelines for stress analysis of process piping, primarily following ASME B31.3 standards. It details the analysis tools, critical lines to analyze, main load cases, and specific requirements for supports, hangers, and modeling. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of vendor data, proper load combinations, and documentation for a comprehensive stress analysis report.

Uploaded by

sarangap
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Quick executive summary

●​ Applicable code: Primary design code is ASME B31.3 (process piping) — follow project
precedence rules (legal → datasheets → specs → codes).​

●​ Analysis tool: Approved program is CAESAR II (Latest, v14 recommended); use


mm.fil (mm units) or project-specific unit file. Include T, P, weight, insulation in runs.​

●​ Which lines to analyze: All stress-critical lines (size, temperature, service, rotating
equipment, PSV lines, expansion joints, cryogenic, HDPE, molten salt — see
thresholds). Prepare a Critical Line List.​

●​ Main load cases to model: Hydro test, Sustained, Operating (normal & design temps),
Thermal expansion, and Occasional (wind, seismic, snow, PSV discharge, surge). Use
prescribed combinations & acceptance criteria (Sh, Sa, Sy).​

●​ Supports & hangers: Spring hangers allowed (variable/constant). Limits for


pedestal/hanger movement, friction coefficients, and spring selection rules are defined.​

Detailed salient points (by topic)


Codes, standards & precedence
●​ Primary: ASME B31.3; other referenced: ASME B31.5, B16.x, BPVC sections, ASTM,
API standards, MSS, AWS, EJMA, ENs as applicable. Follow project document
precedence (laws → datasheets → specs → referenced codes).​

Which piping must be analyzed (stress-critical selection)


●​ Automatic analysis required for:​

○​ NPS ≥ 14” (all)​

○​ 2.5” ≤ NPS < 14”: depends on temperature/material — check table in document.​


○​ All rotating equipment connections (compressors, turbines, pumps, air coolers).​

○​ Expansion joints (all).​

○​ PSV lines (closed-circuit PSV & open-to-atmosphere > 2”).​

○​ Cryogenic lines (T ≤ −50°C).​

○​ HDPE (≥2”) and molten salt systems (all).​

●​ Non-critical small lines may be handled by good engineering practice; but create & agree
Critical Line List early.​

Design loads to include (minimum)


●​ Design/Operating/Test pressures, dead weight (normal & hydro), thermal expansion,
wind, seismic (site-dependent), snow, fluid transients (water hammer, surge), PSV
reaction, soil surcharge (UG), external displacements, installation temps.​

Operation modes & load cases


●​ Typical set: Hydraulic test, Sustained, Normal operating (various pump
combinations), Design temp & pressure, Occasional (wind, earthquake), and other
operational permutations (bypasses, pumps on/off). Include friction where relevant,
especially near pumps/turbines.​

Load combinations & acceptance (key formulas)


●​ Sustained: P + W → ≤ Sh (Sh = allowable operating stress).​

●​ Occasional (wind): P + W + WIN → ≤ 1.2·Sh.​

●​ Occasional (snow): P + W + SNOW → ≤ 1.33·Sh.​

●​ Thermal expansion: TE → ≤ Sa (Sa = f(1.25Sc + 1.25Sh − SL), f = fatigue reduction


factor per B31.3).​

●​ Testing (hydro): HP + WW → < 0.9·Sy (Sy = yield strength).​


●​ Use the document’s CAESAR II load-case table for building combinations / SRSS where
required.​

CAESAR II & modeling rules


●​ Approved tool: CAESAR II (latest). Use project unit file or mm.fil default. Always include
temperature, pressure, weight and insulation.​

●​ Bourdon effect: Consider for translations and for flange classes 900# & above.​

●​ Extend model to first fixed point at tie-ins or to two direction changes if no fixed point.
Buried metallic piping: model up to virtual anchor. Equipment modeled as rigid elements
unless vendor gives nozzle displacements (use WRC-297/537 for nozzle flexibility).​

Pressure relief valve (PRV) reactions & surge


●​ PRV reaction forces: calculate for open & closed systems per API RP 520 Part II.
Dynamic Loading Factor (DLF) = 2 for reaction forces (thermal relief valves excluded).
Surge forces should be provided by Process/Simulation and screened as per Energy
Institute guideline.​

Supports, spring hangers & friction


●​ Spring hangers: Variable and constant types allowed. Pedestal (“F” type) horizontal
displacement limited ±6 mm (±15 mm if sliding assembly used). Hanging support
horizontal deflection limited ±4°.​

●​ Variable spring hanger load variation limits: compressors/turbines 6%, pumps 15%,
static equipment 25%. Use constant hangers when vertical movement or load variation
exceed limits or for critical high-temperature lines.​

●​ Friction coefficients (static) to use: CS-CS = 0.3, CS-concrete = 0.45, CS-PTFE = 0.1,
SS-SS = 0.1. Include friction for vertical supports and near sensitive nozzles and long
runs.​

Flange & nozzle checks


●​ Flange joints: ensure flange loads ≤ established values. Evaluate critical flange leakage
using ASME BPVC Section VIII Appendix 2 equivalent pressure or ASME VIII-2 or
ASME III NC-3658.​

●​ Evaluate flanges for main equipment when T > 200°C and P > 30 bar(g) (or
case-by-case judgment).​

●​ Nozzle allowable loads: use vendor or code values (API values for pumps/compressors):
e.g., API 610 nozzle limits (x2 factor for non-API pumps as guideline), compressors use
3× API 617 guidance. For large nozzle sizes / high classes consult rotating/static
equipment engineers.​

Pipe rack, expansion loops & rack loading


●​ Expansion loops: allowed thermal movement guidance — inside loop 150–200 mm,
outside turns 75–100 mm (typical). Determine loop count based on required movement;
avoid a single huge leg if it creates anchor loads — nest loops if possible.​

●​ Rack loading: provide initial conservative loads early, review at 30% and 60% model
reviews with updated concentrated and distributed loads. Preliminary UDL guidelines:
1.5 kPa for piping/product/insulation; for heavy platform areas provide higher UDL (≥7.5
kPa for lines/platforms >20"). Mark point loads for large lines (≥12"). Include PSV
reactions where applicable.​

Wind / Snow / Seismic


●​ Wind: use EN 1991-1-4; site base wind Vb = 23 m/s, Terrain Category II. Peak velocity
pressure vs height table provided in doc — apply wind in +X, −X, +Y, −Y and
combinations (SRSS).​

●​ Snow: Ws = ½·Do·So where So = 0.35 kN/m².​

●​ Seismic: site return period indicates ag < 0.02 → seismic analysis not necessary per
site data (verify site data early).​

Two-phase flow & vibration


●​ Two-phase lines: provide hold-downs, guides, axial stops; perform modal analysis and
ensure natural frequency > 4 Hz. Use friction stiffness factor 25 for dynamic friction
modeling. Consider acoustic/flow-induced vibration and water-hammer.​

Hydrotest, sag & installation temps


●​ Hydrotest acceptance: HP + WW < 0.9·Sy.​

●​ Pipe sag limit: sustained & hydro test sag ≤ 15 mm; add supports if exceeded.
Temporary supports allowed only for hydrotest.​

●​ Installation temperatures: Hot install = 23.4°C, Cold install = −3.5°C (project ambient
references use 10°C ambient for calculations).​

Fatigue
●​ Consider pressure & thermal cycles. If thermal cycles > 7000, do a fatigue analysis per
B31.3. The fatigue reduction factor f must be determined case-by-case.​

Buried piping & tie-ins


●​ Buried metallic piping: model up to virtual anchor. For tie-ins extend model to first fixed
point or two changes of direction. Module-to-module connections: consider flange or
golden joint per project requirement.​

Rigid element data & weights


●​ Use Pipe-Data-Pro or equivalent for rigid weights if not available in CAESAR library. Bolt
weight rules and guidance listed — consider bolt weights for flanges in sizing rules and
consider actuated valve weight = 1.5× manual valve for preliminary analysis if vendor
data missing.​

Expansion joints / bellows / special hardware


●​ Do not use expansion joints, bellows, snubbers, struts etc. without management
approval. Treat these as special items and justify via vendor/management approvals.​
Cryogenic piping note
●​ Cryogenic piping may be analyzed with ASME B31.3. Material properties change at low
temps: strength typically increases, modulus may increase, expansion coefficient
decreases — account for property changes in model.​

Required deliverables / documentation (stress report)


The stress analysis report should at minimum include:

●​ Input data, assumptions, recommendations & conclusions​

●​ Extract of process critical line list & PEFS (systems)​

●​ Equipment drawings & datasheets​

●​ Piping classes & isometrics (if applicable)​

●​ Spring hanger datasheets, load case reports, stress & restraint summaries​

●​ Anchor-free (WNC) displacement report when applicable​

●​ A prepared checklist for analysis input & output verification.​

Practical checklist — what you must


collect before starting
1.​ P&IDs & Line list (with line service, insulation, classes).​

2.​ Process data: max/min/operating temps & pressures, surge/water-hammer forces from
Process.​

3.​ Hydrotest pressure and installation temperatures.​

4.​ Equipment vendor data: nozzle allowable loads, thermal growth/nozzle displacements,
equipment weights.​
5.​ Valve & fitting weights (actuated valve vendor data or 1.5× manual valve for
preliminary).​

6.​ Insulation spec & insulation density.​

7.​ Support standard & spring hanger data (vendor catalogs).​

8.​ Soil settlement estimates, rack GA and platform levels.​

9.​ Site data: ambient temp, wind table, seismic return period.​

10.​Critical Line List (prepare & agree with lead/process).​

11.​CAESAR II unit file (mm.fil) and project setup details.​

Red flags / common pitfalls to avoid


●​ Starting analysis without vendor nozzle loads (causes rework).​

●​ Failing to model equipment thermal growth (overstressed nozzles).​

●​ Ignoring friction near pumps/turbines — anchor loads will be wrong.​

●​ Not performing anchor-free (WNC) checks for rotating equipment (must allow small
axial/lateral displacement).​

●​ Allowing large single expansion legs instead of splitting loops (huge anchor loads).​

●​ Using default spring hanger selection without checking load variation % for that
equipment.​

●​ Forgetting DLF=2 for PSV reaction forces.​


Quick action plan I recommend (next
24–48 hrs)
1.​ Assemble the Critical Line List and P&IDs; mark obvious critical lines (rotating eqpt,
large diameters, high T, PSV, cryo).​

2.​ Request vendor nozzle loads & thermal growth for all rotating & major static
equipment.​

3.​ Create CAESAR II project unit file (mm.fil) and set up one representative line model to
validate assumptions (weights, insulation, hanger setup).​

4.​ Prepare load-case matrix in CAESAR following the doc’s table and run Sustained /
Expansion / Hydro / Occasional combinations.​

If you want I can next:

●​ Convert this into a one-page checklist/PDF you can hand to your lead; or​

●​ Translate the whole summary to Tamil (since you prefer technical Tamil), or​

●​ Start a template CAESAR II setup checklist (unit file checks, rigid elements, spring
data, load case naming) that you can use to build the first model.​

You might also like