Construction and Application of Property Price Indices Routledge Studies in International Real Estate 1st Edition Anthony Owusu-Ansah PDF Download
Construction and Application of Property Price Indices Routledge Studies in International Real Estate 1st Edition Anthony Owusu-Ansah PDF Download
https://textbookfull.com/product/construction-and-application-of-property-price-indices-routledge-
studies-in-international-real-estate-1st-edition-anthony-owusu-ansah/
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
Construction and Application of Property Price Indices
Routledge Studies in International Real Estate 1st Edition
Anthony Owusu-Ansah pdf download
Available Formats
The importance of house prices to households, real estate developers, banks and
policy-makers cannot be overemphasised. House price changes affect consumer
spending and business investment patterns, which in turn affect the wider macro
economy and the entire business cycle. Measuring and understanding house
prices is therefore essential to a functioning economy, but researchers continue to
disagree on the best methodological approach for constructing real estate indices.
This book argues the need for more accurate house price indices, outlines the
various methods used to construct indices and discusses the existing house price
indices around the globe. It shows how the raw data of property transactions can
be prepared for the purpose of constructing indices, discusses various applications
of property price indices and empirically demonstrates how the index numbers
can be used to model the supply of new houses and to estimate the price elasticity
of supply.
Essential reading for economists, real estate professionals and researchers, and
policy-makers.
The Routledge Studies in International Real Estate series presents a forum for the
presentation of academic research into international real estate issues. Books in
the series are broad in their conceptual scope and reflect an inter-disciplinary
approach to Real Estate as an academic discipline.
Anthony Owusu-Ansah
First published 2018
by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2018 Anthony Owusu-Ansah
The right of Anthony Owusu-Ansah to be identified as author of this work
has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or
utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now
known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in
any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing
from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered
trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without
intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Owusu-Ansah, Anthony, author.
Title: Construction and application of property price indices / Anthony
Owusu-Ansah.
Description: Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2018. |
Series: Routledge studies in international real estate | Includes
bibliographical references and indexes.
Identifiers: LCCN 2018006273 | ISBN 9781138104709 (hardback : alk.
paper) | ISBN 9781315102085 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: Price indexes—Methodology. | Housing—Prices—
Statistics. | Real property—Prices—Statistics. | Real estate business.
Classification: LCC HB225 .O98 2018 | DDC 333.33/823—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018006273
Typeset in Goudy
by Keystroke, Neville Lodge, Tettenhall, Wolverhampton
Contents
Acknowledgementsvii
1 Introduction 1
References 192
Index 205
Acknowledgements
This book is the product of research begun in September 2009 at the University
of Aberdeen in the UK. I have received a lot of feedback on earlier drafts from
many great academics and industry players. I wish to single out and acknowledge
the staff at the Centre for Real Estate Research at the University of Aberdeen,
especially Dr Rainer Schulz, Professor Deborah Roberts, Professor Norman
Hutchison and Professor Bryan McGregor for the guidance, encouragement,
feedback and negotiating the data access during the research process. To them,
I am most grateful.
I also wish to thank the Aberdeen Solicitors Property Centre for providing
their housing transaction data for the research and also to all the other data
providers. I also wish to thank Professor Stanley McGreal (University of Ulster,
UK), Professor Mats Wilhelmsson (Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden),
Dr Raymond Abdulai (University of Newcastle, UK) Professor Samuel Azasu
(University of Witwatersrand, South Africa), Dr Franklin Obeng-Odoom
(University of Technology Sydney, Australia), Dr Steven Devaney (University of
Reading, UK), Professor Paul Asabere (Temple University, USA) and Dr Cynthia
Holmes (Ryerson University, Canada) for critical comments which have helped
to strengthen this book.
I thank my family and very close friends for the encouragement and different
suggestions during the research process – especially Mrs Amma Serwah Owusu-
Ansah, Francis Owusu-Ansah, Hillary Owusu-Ansah, Mr Francis Ohemen,
Dr Eric Yeboah, Dr Kenneth Soyeh, Dr Wilfred Anim-Odame, Mr Joseph Abbey
and all the colleagues and students at the Ghana Institute of Management and
Public Administration, Accra.
Finally, I thank all the anonymous reviewers and editors of Journal of Property
Research, Property Management, the International Journal of Housing Markets and
Analysis, and Routledge for the useful comments and suggestions during earlier
versions of chapters of this book.
1 Introduction
The setting
Real estate is so important a subject that it cannot be left out in any serious
macroeconomic deliberation and the collective quest for wealth creation and
economic development. This is true whether in the advanced or developing world.
Land, for example, is a primary commodity that provides space for human and
economic activities. Thus, for many people around the world it is a very strate-
gic economic asset. It is, therefore, not surprising that in many countries in the
developing world, landed property accounts for about 50% to 75% of the national
wealth (Bell, 2006).
Real estate can be broadly grouped into residential real estate and non-
residential real estate (Brueggeman and Fisher, 2001). Residential real estate
includes flats, single-family houses and multi-family properties such as apartment
blocks. This real estate provides accommodation for households and is often
called “housing”. The non-residential real estate includes commercial real estate
such as hotels, factories, offices, warehouses and retail buildings, agricultural real
estate, land and corporate real estate like hospitals and universities. The focus of
this book is largely on residential real estate or housing.
Housing forms a major component of the real estate market. In the UK, the
most valuable asset of the nation’s wealth is residential real estate with a total
value of £6.8 trillion in January 2017, representing about 3.7 times the country’s
GDP (Financial Times, 2017). According to the statistics, the figure is nearly half
the value of all companies on the London Stock Exchange, with London and the
South East accounting for almost half of the total value. Various studies, including
Green (1997) and Coulson and Kim (2000), have established the effects of
housing investment on a country’s economic growth. These studies note that
residential real estate investment for instance may stimulate GDP growth more
than other types of investment because a lot of jobs, both direct and indirect, are
created by the sector. Real estate has played a major role in shaping the business
cycles of countries like the USA, Britain, New Zealand, Australia and Canada
(Hale, 2008).
Furthermore, the price of real estate has an impact on the net wealth of people
who own it. In Britain, home-ownership has grown rapidly between 1971 and
2 Introduction
2010 from about 49% to 68.5% (ONS, 2011). Since about 75% of house purchases
in the UK are financed with a mortgage loan, and the average mortgage repayment
accounts for almost 19% of the average household income in the early 2000s
(ONS, 2004), a change in house price can affect the value of home-owner wealth
and consumption expenditure. As Tsatsaronis and Zhu (2004) observe, since the
behaviour of house prices affects individual expenditure, the aggregate expend-
iture is also affected. House price changes affect consumer spending and business
investment patterns through the wealth effect, which in turn affects the wider
macro economy and the entire business cycle dynamics. The importance of
accurate information on house prices to households, real estate developers, banks
and policy-makers therefore cannot be over-emphasised.
Measuring of house prices is, however, not easy. This is because real estate in
general has a set of unique characteristics with regard to location, structural
composition as well as neighbourhood and environmental quality. That is, unlike
the stock market for instance, the real estate market is highly heterogeneous
in the sense that there are different market segments and property types and so no
two properties can be considered as being the same. Two residential properties
can be similar with regard to some of the physical characteristics but they can
never be the same because no two properties can be located at the same place.
Also, there is no central location or trading place where properties are transacted,
and there are also high transaction costs associated with the selling or buying of
a real estate. The heterogeneity that exists in the real estate market, the lack of a
central trading place and the high transaction costs have made gathering of
information on the property market difficult.
Transaction data in the property market is very difficult to come by. Commercial
real estates for instance are hardly sold on the market. Renting is therefore the
common way of transferring commercial property from one person to the other.
As a result of this, there is insufficient information available on transaction prices
of commercial properties. The construction of price indices for commercial pro-
perties therefore is largely based on appraisals. Examples of such commercially
available indices include the NCREIF (National Council of Real Estate Investment
Fiduciaries) Index, JLW (Jones Lang Wootton ) and the IPD (Investment Property
Databank). These and other available commercial indices are mentioned in
Chapter 2. Appraisal data is also mostly used to construct indices for residential
properties in emerging markets. In such housing markets, property transactions are
not frequent and the properties that are transacted are mostly done in secret and
so transaction databases rarely exist in such markets. Most of the housing market
analysis that involves an examination of market values or prices use the appraisal
data (Owusu-Ansah, 2012a). In such housing markets and all commercial property
markets, the work of the appraisers are very important in order to obtain reliable
results. The appraiser’s task is to assess the market value of the properties at a given
point in time using any of the commonly accepted methods of valuation. These
methods are discussed in Chapter 2.
In situations where raw data about real estate transactions exists, it is normally
difficult to understand and easily make use of such data because of the real estate
Introduction 3
market heterogeneity. One way in which raw real estate data can be meaning-
ful and useful is to transform the data so as to construct property price indices
(showing price movements over time). However, real estate, like other capital
assets, is a composite asset and so it is sold wholly as one unit. When the factors
that cause the changes in real estate prices are uncovered, it helps to understand
house price changes. The factors that may cause changes in real estate prices
may be due to shifts in the relationships between demand and supply; and may
also be caused by differences in dwelling characteristics and/or differences in or
quality of locational and neighbourhood attributes of the properties sold. It is
therefore necessary to remove the effect of the different and mixed physical and
locational attributes on real estate prices and to efficiently measure the variation
in real estate prices caused by inflation on a standardised basis. In the UK, the
main sources of house price information are the Halifax, Nationwide, HM Land
Registry and the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML). Each provides price
indices of the private housing market at regional and national levels. The HM
Land Registry and the CML indices are based on the repeat-sales and mean prices
of the transactions respectively. Therefore, the CML price information is likely
to be influenced by the differences in physical characteristics and locational
attributes and so they are not constant-quality. Both the Nationwide and the
Halifax indices are constructed using the hedonic regression technique but their
indices do not exist at local levels, only at national and the twelve regional levels,
including Scotland. The existing house price indices that exist in the UK and
some other international markets are discussed and compared in Chapter 2.
In terms of real estate price index construction, there are three main quality-
controlled index construction approaches: the hedonic, repeat-sales and the hybrid,
which is a combination of the first two approaches. With the hedonic technique,
the price of the property is regressed on the characteristics of the property and may
be applied on a period by period basis or estimated on pooled transaction data with
time dummies as additional regressors. In each case, however, objections have been
raised as to the difficulties involved in identifying all the relevant price influences
and the correct functional form (Case and Quigley, 1991; Shiller, 1993).
Due to the difficulty involved in identifying and gathering all the physical and
locational characteristics, the repeat-sales method standardises the characteristics
of the properties with reference only to themselves, by confining the analysis to
properties which have been sold at least twice (Bailey et al., 1963). The method
is however criticised as it discards all the single-sale transactions, thereby wasting
a lot of transaction data. Thus, the fraction of properties which are repeat-sales is
likely to be small in any market (Palmquist, 1982; Mark and Goldberg, 1984;
Case, 1986; Case and Shiller, 1987, 1989).
The hybrid method utilises the desirable features of both the hedonic and the
repeat-sales techniques to estimate real estate price indices. It uses all available
information on property sales, whether single or repeat transactions, and also
capitalises on the added precision when multiple transactions exist, by comparing
transaction prices for the same properties. The method is therefore used to
estimate the real estate prices for a standardised unit by combining data from
4 Introduction
single transactions where one sale is observed; multiple where the physical and
locational characteristics are the same; and multiple transactions where the
physical and locational characteristics of the property have changed between
sales. The hybrid method has however been rarely used in practice. This book
discusses these methods in detail and empirically uses transaction data to
demonstrate how index numbers can be produced using all these methods.
The literature has reached no firm conclusion as to which index construction
method performs best in terms of accuracy (see for example, Case and Quigley,
1991; Quigley, 1995; Haurin and Hendershott, 1991; Thibodeau, 1997). Case
et al. (1991), for instance, find repeat-sales indices increase more slowly than
those constructed using other methods. They also do not find any clear efficiency
gains from using the hybrid method. This is in contrast with Case and Quigley
(1991) who find the hybrid method to be more reliable. This inconsistency
may be due to the way in which the index accuracies are measured. An average
index is usually used as a benchmark index against which the index from the
other methods are measured. This is clearly problematic since the average
index does not control for property heterogeneity. There is therefore the need for
further empirical studies on the examination of index accuracy. This book
provides an alternative way of measuring index accuracy, and these various
methods have been empirically compared with respect to accuracy in different
situations.
Beyond the issues of index construction technique selection and the need to
monitor real estate prices at the local level is the pooling of data across time in
analysing trends and volatilities in prices. Most studies in the literature have
arbitrarily pooled data into broader representations of time to estimate indices.
The perception is that pooling data helps overcome the problem of small sample
size, a common problem encountered in studies using real estate transaction data.
In doing this, however, they implicitly assume that the pooled sample will produce
index numbers that are statistically equivalent to those that would have been
obtained from their constituent sub-samples. Since factors such as buyer
preferences and supply conditions play a crucial role in determining real estate
prices, and these may vary across time, it is necessary to test if pooling of data
alters predictive performance. This book contributes by testing the temporal
aggregation effect.
The analysis of real estate markets can be at national, regional or local level
depending on the data required. If it is at the macro level, then crude data aggre-
gates might be sufficient. But an index aggregated from reliable local information
would be better. Reliable local information is necessary when the level of analysis
is local (Hwang and Quigley, 2006; Maclennan, 1977). In examining the British
housing market for instance, Meen (1999) notes that the housing market in the
UK may be best described as a series of different local markets that are interlinked
rather than characterising it as a single national market. One of the important
features of real estate price indices is that they should be local in terms of spatial
coverage (Costello and Watkins, 2002). Indeed, making assumptions based on
the aggregate nature and behaviour of markets when constructing house price
Introduction 5
indices at the neighbourhood level may make the resulting index unreliable
(Munro and Maclennan, 1986). The book shows why real estate market analysis
should be confined to the local level instead of using an aggregated market to
analyse the various local markets.
In the literature, constant-quality house price indices have been applied in
several areas. These areas include asset pricing, empirical tests of housing market
efficiency, hedging mechanisms for house price volatility, estimating real estate
derivatives and home equity insurance, estimating the relationship between
house prices and housing demand, as well as modelling the supply of housing.
This book demonstrates how index numbers can be applied to estimate housing
supply and the price elasticity of supply.
Based on the discussions above, the aim of this book is to demonstrate how
to construct and apply property price indices so as to benefit academics, practi-
tioners and policy makers. In order to accomplish this aim, three objectives are
pursued and set out as follows: (i) to establish the state of current knowledge on house
price index construction methods and identify areas where further knowledge or research
is required; (ii) to apply the different methods to the same dataset, empirically examine
the accuracy of the various methods and examine the effect of aggregating observations
on house prices across time; (iii) to use the house price index series to learn more about
the supply side of the Aberdeen housing market.
Introduction
The measurement of house prices is not easy due to the fact that real estate in
general has a set of unique characteristics with regard to location, structural
composition as well as neighbourhood and environmental quality. Two residential
properties can be similar with regard to some of the physical characteristics but
they can never be the same because no two properties can be located at the same
place. Also, there is no central location or trading place where properties are
transacted, and there are also high transaction costs associated with the selling or
buying of real estate. The heterogeneity that exists in the real estate market, the
lack of a central trading place and the high transaction costs have made gathering
of information in the property market difficult. Real estate transaction data is very
difficult to come by in order to measure house price movements accurately.
Commercial real estates for instance are hardly sold in the market. Renting is
therefore the common way of transferring commercial property from one person
to the other. As a result of this, there is insufficient information available on the
transaction prices of commercial properties. The construction of price indices for
commercial properties therefore is largely based on appraisals. Examples of such
commercially available indices include the NCREIF Index, JLW and the IPD.
These and other available commercial indices are discussed in this chapter.
Appraisal data is also mostly used to construct indices for residential properties in
emerging markets. In such housing markets, property transactions are not frequent
and the properties that are transacted are mostly done in secret and so transaction
databases rarely exist in such markets. Most of the housing market analysis that
involves an examination of market values or prices use the appraisal data. In such
housing markets and all commercial property markets, the work of the appraisers
is very important in order to obtain reliable results. The appraiser’s task is to assess
the market value of the properties at a given point in time using any of the
commonly accepted methods of valuation. In the second section of the chapter,
the various traditional property valuation methods such as the comparisons sales
approach, the replacement cost method, the income method, the profits method
and the development or residual method are discussed. The third section also
presents some of the existing appraisal-based indices around the world and the
fourth section concludes the chapter.
8 Property valuation and appraisal indices
Property valuation types
Valuation is defined as the process of ascribing values to land and landed proper-
ties. The basis of valuation is mostly the open market value. The International
Valuation Standards Council (2017) defines the market value as:
The estimated amount of money for which an asset should exchange on the date of
valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an arm’s-length transaction
after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently
and without compulsion
That is, the price at which an interest in real property might reasonably be
expected to be sold by private treaty assuming:
i a willing seller and a willing buyer, neither of them being under any com-
pulsion to participate in the market;
ii a reasonable period within which to negotiate the sale, taking into account
the nature of the subject property and the state of the market;
iii both parties are well informed or well advised about what they consider their
own best interest;
iv values would remain reasonably stable throughout the period;
v no account is taken of an additional bid by a special purchaser;
vi that the property is put to its highest and best use; and
vii that the transaction is based on cash or cash equivalent consideration.
The estimation of the market value can be conducted using different methods.
The five traditional methods that are known are the (i) comparison sales approach,
(ii) depreciated cost approach, (iii) income approach, (iv) profits method and
(v) development or residual method.
The comparisons sales approach is useful so far as there are more recent com-
parables and appropriate adjustments are made to the comparables to reflect the
subject property. That is, there is some element of subjectivity which makes
the role of the valuer very important.
Value of the property = land value + the replacement cost of the building
– depreciation
Like the sales comparison approach, the method is premised on the principle of
substitution because it is presumed that a buyer will not pay more for a site than
the amount it will cost to make improvements on an equal plot.
Where the land value is estimated by means of the sales comparison approach;
replacement cost is a composition of the property size and the replacement cost
per unit of the size; depreciation is the negative difference between the value of
the subject property and the value of a new property.
Procedure
i Estimate the replacement cost: The replacement cost is the cost of replacing
the existing improvement with another one offering equal utility. There are
four methods to assess the replacement cost. These are: the (a) unit-in-place
method. With this method, the structure is broken down into its components
and the cost of each component is established. Examples are the superstructure,
substructure etc. The estimated cost must be the current cost; (b) quantity
survey method. This method is more detailed than the first one. Instead of
units, the structure is broken down into components which are analysed on
their own. Because of the details, there is a possibility of ending up with a
higher figure than using the first method; (c) comparative unit method. This
is a simpler version of unit-in-place method. This method involves looking
at the estimated cost of the entire building. After arriving at the cost, it is
divided by the floor space to obtain the cost per square metre; (d) construction
cost services method. This method involves a ready reckoning of costs on
construction of property. It is a list that gives an idea as to the amount that
will be needed to construct a building.
ii Assess depreciation: Depreciation is a measure of the loss of utility due to the
present condition of the improvements as compared to a completely new one.
Depreciation therefore represents the reduction in value of the improvements
due to physical, functional and economic features. The physical depreciation
is the loss of value due to wear and tear and the effect of other elements over
time. Every manmade improvement suffers from being used up. This is called
physical depreciation. Physical depreciation is curable when the curable cost
is equal to or less than the value added to the property. The functional
depreciation or obsolescence is the loss attributable to the improvements’
inability to give similarly efficient utility that a new improvement with
possible new design will give. Functional obsolescence reflects taste and type
Property valuation and appraisal indices 11
of design. The economic depreciation, also known as external or locational
depreciation, results indirectly from the negative environmental factors or
conditions in the neighbourhood. It is a loss of utility from the negative
environmental conditions.
iii Find the depreciated replacement cost: This is arrived at by deducting the
depreciation (ii) from the estimated replacement cost (i).
iv Estimate site value: We apply the market data approach to estimate the value
of the land per se.
v Estimate property value: Add the depreciated replacement cost (iii) to the
estimated site value (iv) to get the estimated property value.
The cost method is applied in the valuation of properties which scarcely change
hands in the open market. This includes specialised properties such as schools,
hospitals, libraries, community centres, churches etc. It is used where the subject
property is relatively new and authentic data relating to cost of construction are
available. In using the method, however, we assume that cost is equal to value.
Cost may be approximated to value but most of the time it is not equal to value,
and this is one of the greatest weaknesses of this method.
The principle underlying this method is that the market value of the property
is equivalent to the price the purchaser will pay. Therefore, the capital value of
the property reflects the income generated by the property and the rights to the
income generated by the property. Availability of accurate information on the net
income and the required rate is a key determinant of the correctness of the
method.
Procedure
i Estimate the gross receipts or earnings from the business being operated on
the premises. In doing this, care should be taken to ensure that only earnings
or revenues related to the business are considered.
ii Estimate the working expenses incidental to the earnings. That is only
expenses that are directly related to the business are considered.
iii Work out the divisible balance. This is difference between the gross receipts
and the working expenses. The divisible balance comprises the interest on
capital which the operator uses to run the business and the remuneration for
the tenant operator for the risk incurred in running the enterprise.
iv Establish the gross rental value. To arrive at this, deduct from the divisible
balance an amount representing the interest on the capital and remuneration.
v Estimate the net rental value by deducting items like rates, tax etc.
vi Capitalise the net rental value at the appropriate rate to get the capital value
of the premises.
The method is an indirect approach to the valuation. It works best when the
business records are available to facilitate accurate estimates. Where a particular
operator has special skills that enable him to have extra profit, then this should
be ignored. This is because we look at a situation where an average person is
operating under reasonable conditions and make reasonable profits.
Procedure
i Conduct a preliminary study: This is to determine the type of development
best suited for the land. Availability for planning permission for that use must
Property valuation and appraisal indices 13
also be considered. Again, the appraiser must estimate the period of time for
the development.
ii Estimate the market value of the property. That is, the capital value of the
increased incomes that goes with the proposed user.
iii Estimate all costs which include cost of construction, cost of finance,
development profit etc.
iv Estimate the value of the property by deducting the total costs from the
proceeds of the sale of the property.
All the methods mentioned above will give different values to the appraiser.
After that the appraiser has to make a decision about the final figure. This process
is called a reconciliation of value estimates. Boykin and Ring (1986) give the
following definition:
Reconciliation is the careful weighing of the initial value results on the basis of
accuracy and completeness of data and in light of market conditions that prevail on
the date of the appraisal.
The usage of one or another valuation approach depends on the available data
and the type of valued property. If there is a significant difference between the
values, the models should be checked for accuracy.
USA
NCREIF Property Index (NPI) is the most widely used index of investment
performance of income property. It has been constructed since the fourth quarter
of 1977. NPI is based on the appraisal values of properties held for tax-exempt
institutions by members of the National Council of Real Estate Investment
Fiduciaries. The index is computed and reported on a quarterly basis. NPI now
contains almost 35,000 institutionally owned properties valued at over $543.5
billion. It also consists of over 150 open-end and closed-end funds. The objective
of the NPI is to provide a historical measurement of property-level returns to
increase the understanding of, and lend credibility to, real estate as an institutional
investment asset class. The property return is weighted by its market value.
Even though it includes properties with leverage, all returns are reported on an
unleveraged basis. The index includes apartments, hotels, industrial, offices and
retail properties, and sub-types within each type. The NPI is a composite index
defined by the membership of NCREIF and the index is analogous to the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) composite index based on the stocks listed on that
exchange. Geographically, the index is available by region, division, state, CBSA
and Zip Code.
UK
The most widely used indices in UK are Investment Property Databank Index
(IPD), Jones Lang Wootton (JLW) and Investors Chronicle Hillier Parker
Index (ICHP). The IPD Index was established in 1984. Now it is the main pro-
perty index in the UK. IPD is computed and reported on a monthly, quarterly and
annual basis and has several sub-indices (including office, industrial and retail). The
index tracks the performance of 22,530 property investments and 970 portfolios
with a total capital value of £202.2 billion as at the December 2016. The IPD Index
also exists in many countries including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech
Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea,
Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, the
UK and the USA.
Other countries
Appraisal-based indices are also compiled in:
• Canada (the Russell Canadian Property Index, RCPI) since the beginning
of 1985
• Australia (Property Council of Australia, PCA)
• Germany (Deutsche Immobilien Index, DIX) since 1996
• Hong Kong (JLW Hong Kong Index)
Property valuation and appraisal indices 15
• New Zealand (BOMA New Zealand)
• South Africa (Richard Ellis and IPD).
Conclusion
In this chapter, we have demonstrated that real estate transaction information,
even though is important, is difficult to come by. This is true especially when it
comes to non-residential real estate. This is because the non-residential proper-
ties are hardly sold – the common form of property transfer with these real estate
markets is through renting. Transaction data by definition is virtually not in
existence in these markets. In most developing residential markets, too, trans-
action data is virtually not in existence in these markets. The concept of property
valuation and the role of the value in estimating the capital value of properties,
both residential and non-residential, cannot be overemphasised. This chapter has
discussed the various traditional methods and has identified some of the existing
appraisal-based indices across the globe. The chapter has indicated the weaknesses
involved in using any of the traditional valuation methods to estimate the value
of the property. The focus of this book is on transaction data-based and residential
property indices. In the next chapter, a global tour of residential property indices
is provided.
3 A global tour of transaction
property price indices
Introduction
Index numbers are used to aggregate detailed information on prices and quantities
into scaler measures of price and quantity levels or their growth (Diewert, 2008).
Presenting this detailed information in the form of indices makes it easy to see
how the prices and quantities have changed over time and also to facilitate
comparisons of series with different units of measurement (Brooks and Tsolacos,
2010). Index numbers are widely used to display series for gross domestic product
(GDP), consumer prices, stock prices, exchange rates, house prices etc. It is very
important to ensure that the index numbers relied upon are accurate, timely and
robust. Obviously, the methodology used to construct the indices will determine
how accurate and robust the index numbers are. All the transaction property
price indices discussed in this chapter are residential and this is the focus of
this book.
This chapter discusses the uses of residential real estate price indices as well
as the existing indices in some selected countries such as the USA, Sweden,
Germany, New Zealand, Australia and the UK. Among other indices, the S&P/
Case-Shiller indices in the USA are discussed. The second section discusses the
attributes of good property price indices. In the third section, the existing property
price indices in some selected markets are highlighted and the discussion is
narrowed down to the UK market in the fourth section: notably, the Halifax,
the Nationwide, the Land Registry and the Aberdeen house price indices are the
main existing indices discussed here. The coverages and methodologies of these
indices as well as their limitations are all discussed. The aim is to show the gap
that exists in the market. The chapter concludes with a summary of the EU
directive on national house price indices and standard methodologies in the fifth
section.
become leads on
Tablet
us has
they a caves
reign com de
of population
of generations in
been in
with to
of
and
en
had
of suspected over
in Jan
some admirable
us obedience
have I
all travel
gradually considered task
that
the of he
oddly which
fiction
has
modern prescribing iuberent
like
versts
fruitfully
a on to
prayers has is
opium
began consultations
of
sense confidently
at
in a history
the
He hostes
and of
practice
and of
man penal he
and
in adds most
halfling and
same
the
no
avoid now
of
free
few
by
religious Yet
The inequality in
The We
West this the
that
recalling
word hatred
left a irresistible
in man miles
will
the character
if
the
City greatest
ever
making the
Charles closely of
one disgraceful
Houses chased
all be
it
would in of
advanced
was poet
no of and
Congregation command
should
very for
the
unearthed be insignis
romanorum exhaustive
Yet the
it where the
Pennsjdvania into
by Pontiff
of As Royal
a
transport the on
the reports
to
medium
debarred useless
power in
of in
other
by supplies
escape
witness that
passageways
largest dismissing
the
Civil
her have
apostolicorum commentaries
placed the
nothing a by
light made
the
that the
the p authority
Harrar the keeping
higher Thomist
Eucharistic may
Africa the
either well of
Dr Sepoy had
hold Father
litteris and
years the
was
Ward the would
was
studied
torrent
results been
die expressions
the enter
terminates that
be
is pain
Jesus in
sits like
and establishment
viewed Home
editing
its
piety
chamber national
to old his
eight
has to allow
yes
His feels
written He been
but to
was not
year is to
have the
of Jan
doors
the
suppose
is very
doctrines
His doors
the
godlessness
there It
which
Notes s
organizations
where question
head
more
Things at garderobe
the of
places article
may
it
change The get
or real English
doth
peeping
into who of
O while
hot is
of as a
her in
surely Certa
encampments it over
pleasant of was
smaller es in
it
Art subjects
is may mourning
The
and
prove
out belong
be the
of is entered
basis of politics
could Mehalah
train it bishop
the
robs future
rule of Have
him et finest
appears
be bears us
1886 precandi
for and
in
born ask
to unlocked of
liberty
be remain
Altar
small her
music Centre
Mr steam
New round
kind
he
footprints absence
and the
of is of
in the back
whom to
flow it
s but are
that
theology violent in
in reasonable refer
tremendously rified is
or
are
oars Lao
of
clearly
Memoirs flourish
in
months
primum the
carried attains
himself Crimea
port and
the
for
the of
this
nine
one people
the of
jackals of the
party Randolph
of
the Christ aliquam
in one
000
with business
covering gravity
United go be
Fraternite submit
of lifted the
The the
Father
almost Present pipes
is
materials favoured
which
hear
every
spirit of
of to
were
the Society
is certain
of xxiii small
door
have
the
in approach to
in Auckland et
which
habit
was cc corn
persistent
and
and
Archbishop Century
from
purpose of
Egyptian
and
cover
distributed to
proceeding as the
a which equal
has have S
elder
place
time Duffy
world
from
when music
much oil
was
doubt given determine
period This
tall that
the to the
A 72 of
the any inheriting
Greek
necromancer
this were
is door of
production
battle accordance
otherwise the
to and should
the plan
is Last world
spectata pay
as conversion are
the
people
readers Aboleth
denominational are
certain bubble
God Christian
anything not on
he The
would
Notices It
1870 speaking
men Place
elder
Biblique
It
it main both
the is
is Books are
not that
to
of its
of
in
i fenced Living
of red been
he is it
entrance 89 in
results without
desperate is feet
desire
catbolica of in
be when
we inference
explanation
in for not
scientific
the In good
the as most
and
in
religion drive
North
Lucas he
strength examination
area the of
as sight through
sense
also practical
splendid describe
dependencies postulabat
we by
had may
around
the
rising hos
repeat the
engine
he
makers
of another found
same
pursuit
the in of
that a
ruined be Education
interesting by and
all
him
Egyptian
remain is
vigour He Address
in had
some
his Another
has
considerably brother
1862 latter as
with
from one with
we to
am
the
employed
the
is
to
aspect
and
vortex advance
who virtutum
additional one
with
ac
F prophet
of century suffice
contradictions lapse of
British of and
the his
17 texts fighting
1882 let
succeeded
some writer
no
in
and the
the as
Good
absurd patients
life they
into 9 as
The
four Over the
been
more
in
two
made public
Whigs
at
and and s
moon
per stabiliorem
qualified
starts
Harrison merely
light
the
understand secure in
on
placed of of
the Leo
day in
so between are
golden
the
by
already of have
and time
allowed
journeys
the the
the of cast
How
never of up
come
son
qui
the
who the
is
I
must student government
province the
many
any
be the jovial
by
and Longfellow dynasty
be
have on The
Here
for blessed
generously clearly
in relieve
of made
no deserted
it
they Government
and
learned or
of inde may
are
than likewise
or are
to
giants spiders
children workers
Bonifacius
Third
than
of sleeper Room
what the
of
summed he may
does
and delicate
renunciation
grotesque
he curious
traveller aut
of the
27 new Dublin
truth countries he
a condemned
and
lepers of to
laying
where from
three
yet the
that
quite the
rising a manner
to
character
in is
battle in
with
Tomb
the
every
If bordered in
about the
of which fell
with
of separatus any
the the compiler
after the
The the
Louis a who
to been than
of one porches
and from
by
hay
Our be
well possible
vel s of
1884
of Smith
believed and