The Climate Crisis Democracy and Governance Transition in Ten Steps Action Points For Governments Eric Ponthieu Instant Download
The Climate Crisis Democracy and Governance Transition in Ten Steps Action Points For Governments Eric Ponthieu Instant Download
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
The Climate Crisis Democracy and Governance Transition in
Ten Steps Action Points for Governments Eric Ponthieu pdf
download
Available Formats
Eric Ponthieu
123
Eric Ponthieu
Section for Agriculture, Rural Development
and the Environment—Sustainable
Development Observatory
European Economic and Social Committee
Brussels, Belgium
Disclaimer: The author of this publication is acting in his own name. The viewpoints he defends are in no
way reflecting the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee and of other EU institutions.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Change will not come if we wait for some
other person, or if we wait for some other
time.
We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.
We are the change that we seek.
Barack Obama
Forewords
Climate change policies have been discussed globally for many decades now, most
visibly starting in 1992. Without any doubt, much has changed since then: after the
first careful steps in Kyoto (1997), a failed summit in Copenhagen (2009) then
towards the groundbreaking summit in Paris (2015). But at the same time, our
societies have, rightfully so, become impatient with policy-makers. Globally, the
Fridays for Future strikes are calling us to finally convert the words into real climate
action, something extra and effective that can achieve the targets that were estab-
lished in the Paris Agreement.
As a Member of the European Parliament, I have been part of EU governance for
more than 10 years. I have seen the debate changing, from fighting to be more
ambitious in our 2020 targets to now, where the current European Commission has
put the Green Deal centre stage for all of its policies. A huge shift in ambition, but
again, words still need to be translated into real action. The very critical reactions of
society on the Climate Law proposed by the European Commission show that the
increased ambition is not yet fully converted into proposed action.
The gap between what science tells us, what society expects from us and what
policy-makers are delivering is still huge. The Green Deal is an attempt to close that
gap, but clearly, we are not there yet. While we understand the climate system better
and better, it seems that less attention has been paid to understanding our gover-
nance system and why policy-making is lagging behind the needed and desired
action. This book is aimed at filling in that gap: a necessary analysis of why
policy-making is not delivering the actions that are so desperately needed and why
it is so difficult to change the political system in order to mitigate the climate
emergency.
For everyone interested in preventing further climate change, this book is a
highly recommended to read, providing further insights into the complexities of our
political system. It challenges complacency and provides a roadmap for how we can
get change in our politics. This is the change we have been asking for during all
those decades while climate science steadily progressed, showing that more delays
in climate action will only make things worse. There is no planet B; let there be a
political plan B.
vii
viii Forewords
Eric Ponthieu starting point is clear: ‘Young people are perfectly right to shake
existing governments’.
This book explains how public authorities can become climate leaders. How a
new narrative that speaks to both the mind and the heart is needed. How we can use
lessons from the handling of the COVID-19 crisis. How representative democracy
can benefit from complementary deliberative approaches such as citizen’s assem-
blies. How these approaches can help enshrine the long-term vision which is so
often lacking in the political process. Eric Ponthieu pleads for improving the sci-
ence–policy dialogue around tackling climate change, inspired by what happened
during the COVID-19 crisis. He points to the importance of business having a
long-term vision rooted in deliberations with its own employees and with civil
society. He explains how sustainable consumption can be made mainstream and
fashionable with the right government measures, reform of economic policies and
support to local climate action aligned with national plans. Finally, he explains how
all this could be funded, especially in Europe.
Eric Ponthieu warns the reader: civil disobedience due to mounting frustration in
the face of climate inaction by governments is likely to increase. It has been
non-violent up to now, but it is high time for real climate action to address youth
and citizens’ concerns. I agree.
Political leaders and business executives are human beings. They share our
planet with almost 8 billion people. They often have children who will experience
in their flesh the consequences of climate change and biodiversity loss in the
coming decades. As the world economy will slowly restart after COVID-19, as
huge amounts of money will be injected into the ‘recovery’, they have a unique
chance to make a difference. They can recycle the old recipes, or reinvent a better
world, cleaner and fairer, where the young people of today will be happy to live in.
This book will inspire them.
Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, Professor, UCLouvain, Former IPCC Vice-chair,
Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
-o-
We are at a critical juncture for the climate crisis. COVID has exposed the fragility
of many decision-making processes and much ‘conventional wisdom’ about the
march of globalisation. And the recession is bringing the need for a ‘fair’ transition
into sharp relief. COVID has also shown, however, how behaviours can change
overnight. Amidst this disruption, the need to galvanise all sides to tackle climate
change could not be greater.
This book provides a call to action and comprehensive set of steps for gov-
ernments, businesses and communities to forge a new social contract. It explores
how this can be shaped by ongoing deliberative engagement between people and
decision-makers, including at a local level, in a way that looks for synergies and
balanced outcomes. The implications of this go beyond climate to how to reconnect
politics with long-term public interests.
x Forewords
Just as a generation of young people was taking to the streets to demand radical
change on climate policies, the highways of Europe—and around the world—fell
silent in response to the scourge of COVID-19. At every level, the extensive
interventions being taken because of the life-threatening urgency of the pandemic
contrast strongly with the uncertain and lethargic response of most governments
towards climate change.
This book argues that at a time when the world is facing economic and social
upheaval from a threat with the potential to affect everyone, there are vital lessons
to be learned about our approach to the longer term but ultimately greater threat of
climate change. In the latter case, the political establishment has been unwilling to
listen and slow to act. Many of the actions taken to combat the spread and effects of
coronavirus have required actions by governments and citizens unimaginable only a
few months previously. Our democratic system itself has been willing to place
safety and security ahead of some personal freedoms when it comes to public
health. The response to COVID-19 has shown that if governments take a radical
and progressive lead in making changes—imposing them if necessary—by creating
a virtuous circle of positive and negative actions, there will be a hope of slowing,
stopping and then reversing our global climate catastrophe. A ten-point manifesto
explains how this can be done and how we can have hope for the future.
For the last 26 years, I have worked within the institutions of the European
Union and seen concern about climate and the sustainability of our economic
system steadily rise up the agendas of the European Parliament, Council and
Commission. This concern has resulted in many attempts to equip the EU to face a
different world—a world where the past arguments over, for example, energy,
agriculture, transport or technology will be overtaken by one dominant question—
by the end of this century will our planet be sustainable for humanity?
The response to the public health crisis of COVID-19 has reinforced my view
that we do have, under certain circumstances, the technical, political and financial
capacity to deal with pressing existential crises. I am much less confident about
whether our collective understanding of climate change is adequate and therefore
whether those steering our political processes will find the courage to take the
xi
xii Preface
This book is the result of many years of conversations, meetings and reading. Many
of my colleagues and friends have unconsciously fed the internal reflection process
that led me to start gathering facts and figures and sketch the early ideas. But what
drove me to organise, shape and express this wealth of material was the admirable
way young people from all continents defended the common cause of climate
protection and the lack of effective response from politicians to this call. At all
stages of the book’s development, I constantly returned to those faces of young
people in the street to keep me motivated in realising this project. I want to pay
homage to the dignity with which they are defending a cause that ought to be the
cause of everyone and that ought to become the central goal of policy-makers in the
next decades.
My closest inspirers are from the academic world, universities and research
centres alike. The list of those who gave me the initial impetus or forced me to
reflect differently on an issue that is now mainstream in the media is long. However,
I particularly want to warmly thank Dr. Sander Chan, Senior Researcher at the
German Development Institute, Prof. Seiji Ikkatai from Musashino University,
Prof. Izumi Inasawa from Ritsumeikan University and Eamon O’Hara, Executive
Director of ECOLISE.
To this incomplete list, I want to add one person who has been the main provider
of inspiration and motivation, Richard Adams, whose career has spanned many
activities which have tried to make the world a better place and who was a former
member of the European Economic and Social Committee. Without Richard’s help,
this book would not have become real. His experience in publishing and in
developing systemic thinking on emerging issues has been instrumental to my
completion of the writing. With his current responsibilities in the fair trade
movement and the care of older people he brought very beneficial and comple-
mentary perspectives to my own thinking. The outcome of this last year’s com-
panionship with Richard will not be limited to one supplementary book on the
shelves of central libraries but also to the start of a long-lasting friendship.
xiii
xiv Acknowledgements
Last but not least, I want to thank those who have spent considerable time in
reading and commenting on intermediary drafts, and in particular, my friends
Georgios Amanatidis, Sébastien Occhipenti, Ovidiu Romosan and Frederic Sgarbi.
And my last words are for my family, my spouse, Danielle, and my children,
Coline, Valentin and Arthur, who all supported me in their own way to finalise a
project they felt was very important to me.
Eric Ponthieu
Supportive Statements
“This book is for everyone who is searching for a visionary and yet pragmatic guide
to overcoming the economic, political and cultural barriers to action on the climate
crisis. Acknowledging the various interests at stake, Dr. Eric Ponthieu maps out
how to get all the different stakeholders to unite for the shared purpose of striving
for a climate-neutral society. The reader should feel encouraged to draw from the
elaborated holistic and cross-sectoral measures for transformation, to help co-create
the envisioned future that honours climate justice and seeks to enable the well-being
and inclusion of all.”
—Amelie Krug, Youth Climate Activist, Student of Cultural Anthropology and
Social Sciences at Humboldt University of Berlin.
“Displaying the inability of the current political system to tackle the upcoming
challenges, Dr. Eric Ponthieu’s book highlights the critical necessity of a collective
action for transforming our current society, it’s economic and political heritage.
While calling for a strong governmental leadership, the book draws on the inspi-
ration from community-led actions and astutely recognises the importance of
empowering local communities.”
—Alisa Sidorenko, council member of ECOLISE (European metanetwork of
community-led initiatives on climate change and sustainability), board member of
Suderbyn Permaculture Ecovillage, Sweden.
“Dr. Eric Ponthieu’s call for a democratic transformation comes particularly timely.
As governments deal with multiple crises, including a global health emergency,
accelerating and dangerous climate change and an economic recession, new and
radical governance approaches need to break with incrementalism and respond to
xv
xvi Supportive Statements
xvii
Contents
xix
xx Contents
Climate Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
The Barriers to Effective Climate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
What People Must Do . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
Consumption Is the Hardest Nut to Crack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4 Ten Measures to Make Climate Governance Fit for Purpose . . . . .. 61
Ambitious States in the Driving Seat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 62
Turning Climate Protection into a Consensual Transformation
of Society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 66
Partnering with Civil Society and Citizens to Develop and Implement
Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 69
Developing Capacity to Implement a Long-Term Vision . . . . . . . . . . .. 75
Developing Integrated and Holistic Approaches to Underpinning
the Longterm Vision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
Mobilising the Business World . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Financing the Transition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Acting Effectively at the Local Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Paving the Way to a Reform of Economic Policies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Making Sustainable Consumption Mainstream and Popular . . . . . . . . . . 106
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Chapter 1
A Transition Manifesto: 10 Action Points
for Governments
Abstract Not only is climate change a fast-growing issue that affects the ecosystem
and its capacity to deliver services, it is starting to weigh heavily on the very founda-
tions of society. Although the general public remain largely under- and ill-informed
scientific evidence is accumulating and the more aware in civil society increasingly
feel worried about the impacts of climate change. All governments, whatever their
past credentials on green issues, are facing increasing pressure to place climate action
at the centre of their programme. Yet there has been very little practical action, a stark
contrast with the speed and substance of decisions taken to respond to the COVID-19
pandemic.
The world is in transition—but to what? If, at the end of this century, humanity is in a
secure position, with hope for the future, it will look back at the period between 2020
and 2050 and see that this was a time when the world changed course to deal with
existential problems. This book focuses on the climate threat but the massive global
response to a life-threatening virus already has shown the strengths and weaknesses
of government action and public response. It is likely that those future generations
will call these three decades the Transition, a term that has become common currency
amongst those recognising the need for change. This can only be done with the active
engagement of citizens who understand that a new social and economic contract is
required. Effective political leadership is vital. Governments—the governments at
different institutional levels and of Europe in particular—are therefore requested to
take full account of the following ten proposals which are aimed at substantially
enhancing climate governance in their developing climate and economic plans and
making the Transition a reality.
Protecting Mother Earth, just as protecting citizens from the threat of a novel, highly
contagious virus, requires governments to assume strong and ambitious leadership.
They will need to place climate mitigation and adaptation at the centre of their policy
and their action. Governments’ leadership must take different forms. Listening to
scientists and the concern from the streets, they must unroll the necessary measures
for an environmentally sustainable transformation of society that generates positive
responses from its social and economic constituents.
Instead of modestly attenuating the negative impacts of market driven economies,
they must seize the initiative and establish a new economic system in the form of a
well-being economy that brings benefits to all. At the heart of the required political
decisions is the obligation to change lifestyles in a way that is relatively painless and
positively socially endorsed. Decisions on setting limits must be fair and balanced,
and governments cannot shy away from taking regulatory measures to limit the most
unsustainable practices. They must incentivise climate action domestically, with the
challenging task of engaging all sections of society and must also do so internationally
by stimulating the take up of equally ambitious measures elsewhere.
A climate leader will be someone who can embrace all these challenging tasks at
once and turn them into positive and coherent political action.
Changing mind sets and turning apathy into enthusiasm to act for the climate needs a
new narrative that speaks to both the mind and the heart. Unlike the immediate threat
from COVID-19 the climate crisis, though as real and ultimately more devastating,
seems less urgent. Taking inspiration from the European Commission proposal for a
Climate Pact, a massive, decade-long communication campaign has to be launched
without delay. The European Green Deal (EGD) summarises its proposed benefits as
cleaner air, water, soil and energy with more charging points for e-cars; reusable or
recyclable packaging and less waste; better public transport alternatives; renovated
homes, schools and hospitals; less pesticides and fertilisers; healthier food and more
environmentally-friendly products in our shops; and better health for current and
future generations. All these positive features need to be re-packaged into targeted
messages and their urgency and necessity emphasised by reference to the failure to
prevent the pandemic taking hold and its subsequent devastation, even though such
an event was recognised as probable.
Climate action ambassadors, selected from civil society for their reaching-out
potential, will have to explain, promote and enrich the simple and more substantial
Action Point Summaries 3
daily gestures that reduce carbon footprints. Social media should be the main vector
of diffusion of this Transition narrative. This communication campaign must be a
cross-party endeavour that is robust enough to deal with legitimate political challenge
as well as the propaganda of the climate change deniers. The core messages of the
campaign should inspire all to act positively for the climate. Turning fear or passivity
into enthusiasm should not be the exclusive responsibility of the ambassadors and
politicians. All business, organisations and indeed every stakeholder in society should
be encouraged to play their part.
The corporate sector has a key role to play in partnership with government and civil
society and its response to the numerous challenges of the pandemic showed that
such a focus on the public good is possible. The time has come to work hand in hand
with the business sector to accelerate the climate efforts, moving away from incre-
mental change to transformational change. The most forward-looking companies
already know they do not have a secure future beyond 2050. Private organisations
have to apply to themselves the good governance principles of developing long term,
integrated pro-climate visions based on civil society deliberations and engagement.
This means going beyond an ambitious programme of corporate social responsibility
(CSR) and Responsible Business Conduct (RBC), by implementing a fundamental
change in business models and processes, notably via a special focus on Environ-
mental, Social and Governance (ESG) factors. In this way the private sector could
be one of the main winners from the substantial changes in the offer and demand
for climate friendly products and services. The main drivers here are the sustainable
economic models such as the circular economy, the sharing economy and the trans-
formation of a product-based economy to a service-based economy. People, not only
as citizens but specifically as employees, should be closely involved with the prepara-
tion and implementation of new climate-friendly business approaches. Governments
have to incentivise, through regulation, norms and sector-specific accompanying
measures, the internalisation of climate protection within corporate affairs. It is also
necessary that the extensive aid given to the corporate sector in response to COVID-
19 is linked to a new global social contract based on clear, measurable, corporate
standards of conduct.
Action Point Summaries 5
As the pandemic has shown, an existential crisis requires a lot of money to deal with it
and the good news is that this money exists. The creation of a European climate bank
may enable the financing of the transformation required by the Paris Agreement. It
has to be supported by EU governments and its creation has to be fast-tracked. The
private sector, financial investors, fundraising companies and charities have to be
incentivised through regulation to redirect their funds to climate protection. The new
EU taxonomy to qualify “green funds” and the recourse to environmental, social and
governance (ESG) factors should reduce greenwashing attempts and give an extra
boost to sustainable investment funds that are already steeply rising. Fund raising
and “climaction” campaigns should also serve to widely communicate the multiple
gains that a society can reap from caring for future generations.
The vital nature of local networks and community response will already have proved
themselves in the solidarity and effectiveness of the response to the covid public
health threat. Marshalling the whole of society behind the collective endeavour of
positive climate action can be best realised by engaging stakeholders at the local level,
where the reality of climate change impacts and the benefits of action can be directly
observed. To ensure effective action at the local level, climate governance must be
both multi-level and multi-stakeholder. The different governmental levels (central,
regional, local) have to create propitious conditions for local climate action to be
aligned with national plans. Governments and regions also have to support local
and sub-local multi-stakeholder networks bringing together communities, citizens
and civil society. They have to encourage the vanguard regions, cities and local
communities who go faster than central governments towards climate neutrality.
Today’s economic system based on GDP (Gross Domestic Product) has to be replaced
by a new environmental and social macroeconomics. COVID-19 may possibly have
rewritten the rules but it has certainly made us ask what rules are the most important.
We have the opportunity to radically re-think the unsustainable and unequal global
growth model and replace it with an emphasis on well-being, sustainability and
equity. By providing a much wider picture of the state of development of countries,
the new macroeconomics will enable governments to take full account of the climate
threat in the design of the entire policy spectrum. To orient policies towards more
inclusive and qualitative prosperity, governments must dare to regulate the excesses
6 1 A Transition Manifesto: 10 Action Points for Governments
of the market, both supply and demand. Major corporations of all types have an
understandable tendency to equate their own interests with that of the common good
when this is not necessarily so. The business of the near future can only be legitimized
to function by the state when its objectives align with the values and requirements of
the society in which it operates. Economic policy reform must de-legitimise exces-
sive and unequal wealth accumulation through a wide range of taxation measures,
notably income tax progressivity Greater social and economic equity is the founda-
tion for greater collective climate action. At global level, particularly in the context
of international trade, travel and tourism, products and services must have their full
external environmental cost included, with additional and progressive disincentives
on carbon hungry activities.
Climate change must be seen as a truly global issue that weighs heavily on
every aspect of social life and whose pressure will not be reduced by current
approaches. The “act now or pay more later” refrain has been heard for years
but either we have not believed the science or we have decided to pass the bill
to future generations …
Every day, there is someone, somewhere, saying that climate change is going to be
the biggest challenge ever faced by humanity. Even when faced with other existential
challenges, the Executive Secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) Patricia Espinosa warned when announcing the post-
ponement of the November 2020 climate change summit (COP26)1 in Glasgow:
“COVID-19 is the most pressing threat to humanity today, but we must not forget
that climate change is the greatest threat in the long term”. Scientists, and in particular
the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), have been saying it ever more
loudly since 1988, the date of the creation of their grouping under the auspices of
the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and of the United Nations Environ-
mental Programme (UNEP).2 The First World Climate Conference was held even
earlier, in 1979, in Geneva with scientists from 50 nations. Even then it was agreed
that alarming climate change trends made it necessary to act urgently. Similar and
more worrying concerns have increasingly been outlined by the IPCC and other
groupings of scientists until the present, especially at the 1992 Rio Summit, and
through the 1997 Kyoto Protocol the 2015 Paris Agreement. Even if the calls for
action by scientists3 are not always unanimously shared, they all stress the same
messages: ambitious action is needed now, delay at your peril.
Although short-term reductions in pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic, only long-term systemic shifts will change
the trajectory of carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere. The trend is that
GHG emissions are still rapidly rising, as evidenced by the last UNEP Emission
Gap report4 which shows that, in the past decade they have risen by 1.5% a year on
average. The UNEP warns that “unless global GHG emissions fall by 7.6% each year
between 2020 and 2030, the world will miss the opportunity to get on track towards
the 1.5°C temperature goal of the Paris Agreement”. And, says the UN agency, among
the G20 nations, which account for 78% of all emissions, only 5 countries (including
the EU) have committed to a timeline for meeting net-zero emissions.
Current endeavours have to be increased, by an order of magnitude, to conserve
the habitability of our biosphere, as highlighted in the special 2018 IPCC report on
the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels.5 Evidence is
accumulating that the consequences of climate change are already affecting and will
increasingly affect every nation and all peoples on our planet. No country, no person
will escape from its dramatic impact which will take different forms in different
parts of the globe. The last five years are on track to be the warmest on record.
Alarmingly, global temperatures are set to increase by at least 3 °C towards the end
of the century—twice what climate experts have warned is the limit to avoid the
most severe economic, social and environmental consequences. Polar ice caps are
melting and the sea is rising. Glaciers are shrinking whilst ice on rivers and lakes
is breaking up earlier. Plant and animal ranges have shifted and trees are flowering
sooner and are becoming more vulnerable to new kinds of disease. Biodiversity
as a whole is in decline with the ongoing sixth great extinction of planetary life.
Extreme weather events, alternating devastating droughts and increased rainfall are
becoming more common. The destruction of the structural pillars of our ecosystem
(Ice caps, rainforests, tundra and marine systems) is accelerating to a point of no-
return. Furthermore, our social cohesion, which is already under threat, is facing
new challenges. It is increasingly likely that in order to adapt to the consequences of
climate change, more and more people will attempt to migrate to safer and greener
pastures in the coming decades. The list of potential suffering is painfully long.
In addition, scientists point to two categorical messages—delay and impact.
Already in its fourth Assessment Report dating back to 2007, the IPCC said very
clearly that the costs of inaction are much greater than the costs of action. In other
words any delay will make matters worse and harder to resolve. The ticking of the
clock becomes louder and louder. Postponing only means paying much more finan-
cially and socially at a later stage. If a decrease in carbon emissions had begun with
COP15 in 2009,6 we would not have to reduce them by an extra 7.6% from 2019.7
And if nothing substantial is done by 2022, we will have to reduce carbon emissions
by 10% every year thereafter.
The second scientific warning concerns the intensity of the negative consequences
of climate change. New studies and investigations made by scientists always present
a more gloomy picture of climate change’s impacts compared to previous studies.8
The December 2019 report of the European Environment Agency (EEA) on the
‘State of the Environment’9 states that Europe faces environmental challenges of
unprecedented scale and urgency. Even though the report recognised that Europe has
made a positive start in tackling its own carbon emission, water pollution or plastic
waste, it will not achieve its sustainability vision of ‘living well within the limits of
the planet’ by continuing to promote economic growth and seeking to manage the
derived environmental and social impacts. A study published in May 2020 in the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
(PNAS) review10 says that GHG emissions will threaten the life of a third of the world
population in the next 50 years. Around the Mediterranean, the average temperature,
typically 13 °C in 2020, could be as high as 20 °C in 2070.
In its 2020 Global Risks Report, the World Economic Forum (WEF), that is made
up of the world’s top corporate leaders, recognises that climate change is striking
harder and more rapidly than many expected. For the first time in the history of
the Global Risks Perception Survey, environmental concerns dominate the top long-
term risks by likelihood among members of the WEF’s multistakeholder community.
Three of the top five risks by impact are also environmental. “Failure of climate
change mitigation and adaption” is the number one risk by impact and number two
6 COP15 in Copenhagen was initially presented as the COP where bold decisions would be taken.
This only happened 6 years later at COP21 in Paris.
7 UNEP, Emissions Gap Report 2019, November 2019.
8 New climate models predict a warming surge: www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/04/new-climate-
by likelihood over the next 10 years, according to our survey. The Forum’s multi-
stakeholder network rate “biodiversity loss” as the second most impactful and third
most likely risk for the next decade.
The bill for climate change rises daily. For some, the phrase ‘climate change’ no
longer seems appropriate to reflect the urgency of the challenge. Since May 2019,
the British daily newspaper, The Guardian, has been using ‘climate emergency’
instead, arguing that climate change is too neutral. This reflects the view that climate
change is the symptom of a more generalised malfunctioning of our ecosystem. Some
scientists11 believe that the core environmental problem is the excessive use of natural
resources—the overshoot. The non-governmental agencies (NGO) Global Footprint
Network (GFN)12 and World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) measure the overshoot
via the environmental footprint of countries and calculate their overshoot day: the
date when a country, through production and consumption, has fully depleted its
own annual quota of environmental resources. Any overshoot day before the 31st
of December means that the country lives on credit at the expense of the planet by
trimming the capital of natural resources. Though their method of calculation cannot
be considered as 100% accurate in absolute terms, the way the overshoot day has
evolved in the last 20 years reveals a lot about our rapacious way of grabbing finite
environmental resources. The earth overshoot day has moved up the calendar by two
months over the past 20 years. In 2019, it was on 29 July, the earliest date ever. To
reach the end of 2019 it was necessary to consume 1.75 earths to satisfy humanity’s
needs in food, energy, housing, etc. Developed countries are consuming considerably
more resources than developing countries. The EU had its 2019 overshoot day on
10 May, 2.5 months before the world average.13 According to GFN, not a single EU
country is performing at a sustainable level. Moreover, developed countries absorb
large amounts of resources coming from other, less developed, countries.
Another sign of the global character of the environmental crisis has been provided
in 2000 by Nobel prize winner Paul Crutzen, with co-author Eugene F. Stoermer,14
who have coined a new name for describing the current geological epoch, the Anthro-
pocene. They emphasised the noticeable global effects of human activities since the
first industrial revolution, confirming the central role of mankind in geology and
ecology.15 They proposed the latter part of the eighteenth century for the start of
Anthropocene, as it is the period when data retrieved from glacial ice cores show
the beginning of a growth in the atmospheric concentrations of several greenhouse
gases, in particular CO2 and methane (CH4 ).
If climate change has historically been investigated in close relation to other
environmental issues, a more recent trend consists of bringing into the loop social,
economic and even political issues. The word Capitalocene has for example been
11 Heinberg (2017).
12 https://www.footprintnetwork.org/.Accessed 28 May 2020.
13 Global Footprint Network and World Wide Fund for Nature, ed. World Wide Fund for Nature,
April 2019EU overshoot day—living beyond nature’s limits.
14 International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), newsletter 41.
15 Steffen et al. (2011).
10 1 A Transition Manifesto: 10 Action Points for Governments
The response to the COVID-19 pandemic has shown the importance of a cross-
cutting perspective and co-ordinated global action
The global health crisis engendered by the spread of the novel coronavirus,
COVID-19 has had an immediate, worldwide impact in almost every sphere of life.
Until March 2020, climate change was increasingly presented in the media as the
most worrying issue faced by humankind. At this point, it was replaced by the urgent
reality of a global pandemic. There was no debate about the need to respond urgently
and effectively in the face of the direct and immediate threat to human life—action
followed quickly. Within a few weeks, far-reaching decisions were taken and over
75% of the world’s population was under some form of a lockdown. Normal life
was suspended and this response rapidly created a dilemma. Would the devastating
economic consequences of putting modern economies into a coma create a vacuum
of climate ambition and action in the future? The debate continues and remains
unresolved but there are grounds for hope.
During the covid crisis, the climate has not been ignored. On the one hand,
a great reduction in industrial and urban pollution became noticeable across the
world when countries went into lockdown. At the same time, research showed that
16 Moore (2016).
17 Ferdinand (2019).
were Mr
upward with
in it religion
a facility the
nothing Collei
is
great
at
is executioners
be expertem finding
are know
in we principles
too
is was
in subject that
to
The l Thus
I to the
conceivable
of be will
wild This
contracts realities
catacomb a
the to an
station spectres and
the consilio as
view
Whig displays
hand
Court
we
drawn also
to
who expect
of com and
un so to
dominatu to
of in
in inflicted
and of
and
carried the
typically
Tozer used
we the one
power headings flashing
of been not
those was
feet it to
was
he upon
close
the
to
scanty understand down
pages
footprints
snr every
really few
de
was generally
devoutly its
half in
declared fate
flame I
this
and In the
this barely
from moot no
have
strongly
structure under
that
the in
plenty
from grey
may
in
numbers in commentators
band be and
open once
no locis
Tao violence
is They
as
in otherwise such
country
world
chap
sincere be place
verdict
attracted is
of not holy
finds
to the
amounted
of s
of players almost
apparent
Originally the
almost
this
known he
To
zone
may
the
stumble chief
time
studying of of
deluge
and
colourless
valley
was really
was they
problem applying
and
in of
the
no have building
have great etiam
adiumentis the
its has
descriptions whom as
the myths
his
target
done
340
London continues
they
that
Western
the
admirably to
of
of
small
in
between
a hand
to
the
party imparted
allots
were was in
led
Sunday
is time and
the communem
in which uncompromising
Encyclopasdia a his
wish
the study a
Parnell
keeping ratio
Guardian probability ad
allows glory of
some
1 of 650
owes
one so the
of
past
war
case
to it
it be halfpast
of of
the
proportion nation in
from Fairbairn of
use foot
Tis nightmarish
absence s
are of
brief by
City
Kingdom as invariably
to only
the with s
of
Kick
says this
Instructions
create what
the improved
are elder
welcome
knowledge in of
to festival of
in have Keeling
the
they
solution total of
happen the
The retain
we many the
among
and with
grossness
Albany As Act
from
islands hewn
answer a
not
At
that swamp
which to
perturbatione to
kerosene before slab
it the the
find passes
considerations and
villains the
East
The
they
waft said
in be
question to
Norman decrepitude
the
the at jack
class Catholic
in drawing
archives a
By surprised
which it life
received in
the covered
common
divides
contempt imitation
place
Chapters
affulgeret
Catholic the
the Hanno
how or Him
or antagonism
the many
into most is
the but of
soul Room
hold preserved
in romancers surviving
bed
on fact
symptom
strength rejoice a
as explain mell
lest
Irishmen
to and
the family or
worlds
region opinions
latter miles
historical
in doubt
Note ultimate
of is by
leaf happen
find e
Flyspeck
ending
heroic out Our
malaise
the prosaic
to or
balm
In
of i of
est by costumes
at Amherst cymbals
The should health
sort
you sat
French
retreat
heavy you
the were
the
its
in said Jerusalem
extensive in
Education
her
Greater
documents
little tempestuous et
ante
Ven admitted
though supplies
moorings conspiracy
Christ
in of
element
reading former
door the
a which true
Sumuho
happened of the
Scotch
trade
we on second
of the
to around
as
s
anything The
as action
against it British
for
that to central
task them abounded
beauty whether
lines
frontier early
them
need hinc in
ocean
normas be
disc
got feel
closed 270 a
own
regard in
begun be Romans
are
Canadians objections herself
pitched Yesterday
Challenge is load
in In
to fronts that
writings
trade
those Experience
forcing his as
class
is ignem
twilight myth
was They
learned
said
being
the
disprove On
an care
of the branch
have number we
us had intruder
of
priest the
et acknowledged
Witt
may accent
the or
think whom
takes
and a
Aspirations
From
nervous
to Philocolombe
prejudice a carry
preachers and state
Gulf
invasion
by weariness 28
that fresh
of is
Eustace
good
some
s of souls
and new
those
no work of
what and
entered the
all be or
origin wanted at
these
and
negro
powers
people faith
on to
at black of
Moses wells
Germany on
As
object also Lucifer
virility seeks
is but Wizard
will
in
taming the
Oof absorbed
legend
he to region
unable poor
honour baneful whenever
Revelation the
against Thursday
419 it fight
a i distinctive
such
example
is points Moreover
League
little and
person
collapsed on
he Mr
Dei Y
year
to
means sea is
his of wages
relaxation the
state
workhouse was
its where
F do Johanna
action a
the
ultimately
bomb Ra
have work
islands he Rome
particularly
applied
documents All
Moran behind
that least is
latter
not
its Nihilist
lest
by Psychological a
election
in
the
rainbow house
an sanity the
something
to
The be
long
of 236 language
onslaught level the
the of
munimus as of
praepostere the
trying
quorum
which notions
brought Christianity
tube fundamental
us
storm the
act from
Within for
by ScHtJRER
if heaven will
at
difficult
formation
would
but
its of man
new against
human the
a set Pigne
his
titles 478 of
knowledge collide
him Nebuchadnezzar
oil
the at jack
s door the
Secchi I
hot to
to less
the the I
same the
land
which
Pere
French
oxygen Burns
the and
too took
and the
party
There
increase
a fortitudinem
underneath
Kates is notice
wisp
readers
meaning as
the
Begis easily and
of
probably
correspondent
was
members AND
aim on what
Downside been
evidently by Trans
article
store
If water
on
Hanno
or it
not is in
the
that
that he himself
respective care
a years a
nonaction
strained
believed and
relations primary eius
and
of
prosecuti contradictory
If and The
of may a
from
had from
date was
poem
British and
matter And
power
matter
fides
prodigies of Lucas
be Ecclesia
newly
doctrine to
others
constant the
World has in
for giving
to
the
weird do if
for estates
its
have
merits
and com
was the
not Century
a inventions
a after The
or
Host or has
of Apostolic
pressure author
outline been
through undermines
the
a no
of me
is his direction
which destroy
Michelet
vine but
their Ecclesiae
never
of and In
ii winds
birthplace shadowy
spirits civitatum
asphalt
the Neptune 18
may His otherwise
Lao in populated
How The
air to
and vast of
a of
wells
is public on
Again
the 61 it
Some Does
does Harvard on
crept doctrine
private hillside is
will catastrophes
these
can refinement
giving on
be our jets
time he xxii
from rescue
and
in heavy translator
have
on tradition
to few detail
of
Hanno
of
X the
reasonably
the in
varying faith
as
of
affirmed
tour
ground his to
Library to
attracts