(Ebook) Classical Mechanics by Herbert Goldstein, Charles P. Poole, John Safko ISBN 9788131758915, 8131758915 2025 Instant Download
(Ebook) Classical Mechanics by Herbert Goldstein, Charles P. Poole, John Safko ISBN 9788131758915, 8131758915 2025 Instant Download
https://ebooknice.com/product/classical-mechanics-6710984
★★★★★
4.6 out of 5.0 (42 reviews )
DOWNLOAD PDF
ebooknice.com
(Ebook) Classical Mechanics by Herbert Goldstein, Charles P.
Poole, John Safko ISBN 9788131758915, 8131758915 Pdf
Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebooknice.com/product/classical-mechanics-27203868
https://ebooknice.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-6661374
https://ebooknice.com/product/matematik-5000-kurs-2c-larobok-23848312
https://ebooknice.com/product/sat-ii-success-math-1c-and-2c-2002-peterson-
s-sat-ii-success-1722018
(Ebook) Master SAT II Math 1c and 2c 4th ed (Arco Master the SAT
Subject Test: Math Levels 1 & 2) by Arco ISBN 9780768923049,
0768923042
https://ebooknice.com/product/master-sat-ii-math-1c-and-2c-4th-ed-arco-
master-the-sat-subject-test-math-levels-1-2-2326094
https://ebooknice.com/product/foundations-of-classical-mechanics-10581976
https://ebooknice.com/product/introduction-to-nanotechnology-1114378
https://ebooknice.com/product/encyclopedic-dictionary-of-condensed-matter-
physics-1364444
CLASSICAL MECHANICS
THIRD EDITION
Herbert Goldstein
Columbia University
Charles P. Poole
University of South Carolina
John L. Safko
University of South Carolina
Authorized adaptation from the United States edition, entitled Classical Mechanics, 3rd Edition, ISBN:
9788131758915 by Goldstein, Herbert; Poole, Charles; Safko, John; published by Pearson Education, Inc.,
publishing as Addison-Wesley, Copyright c 2002
This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out
or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior written consent in any form of binding or cover other than
that in which it is published without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on subsequent
purchaser and without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means
(electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the
copyright owner and above-mentioned publisher of this book.
No part of this eBook may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without the publisher’s
prior written consent.
This eBook may or may not include all assets that were part of the print version. The publisher
reserves the right to remove any material in this eBook at any time.
ISBN 978-81-317-5891-5
eISBN 978-93-325-7618-6
First Impression
This edition is manufactured in India and is authorized for sale only in India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Pakistan,
Nepal, Sri Lanka and the Maldives.
Published by Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd, licensees of Pearson Education in South Asia.
Head Office: 15th Floor, Tower-B, World Trade Tower, Plot No. 1, Block-C, Sector-16,
Noida 201 301, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Registered Office: 4th Floor, Software Block, Elnet Software City, TS-140, Block 2 & 9,
Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Taramani, Chennai 600 113, Tamil Nadu, India.
Fax: 080-30461003, Phone: 080-30461060
www.pearson.co.in, Email: [email protected]
iii
6 Oscillations 238
6.1 Formulation of the Problem 238
6.2 The Eigenvalue Equation and the Principal Axis Transformation 241
The first edition of this text appeared in 1950, and it was so well received that
it went through a second printing the very next year. Throughout the next three
decades it maintained its position as the acknowledged standard text for the
introductory Classical Mechanics course in graduate level physics curricula
throughout the United States, and in many other countries around the world.
Some major institutions also used it for senior level undergraduate Mechanics.
Thirty years later, in 1980, a second edition appeared which was “a through-going
revision of the first edition.” The preface to the second edition contains the fol-
lowing statement: “I have tried to retain, as much as possible, the advantages of
the first edition while taking into account the developments of the subject itself,
its position in the curriculum, and its applications to other fields.” This is the
philosophy which has guided the preparation of this third edition twenty more
years later.
The second edition introduced one additional chapter on Perturbation The-
ory, and changed the ordering of the chapter on Small Oscillations. In addition it
added a significant amount of new material which increased the number of pages
by about 68%. This third edition adds still one more new chapter on Nonlinear
Dynamics or Chaos, but counterbalances this by reducing the amount of material
in several of the other chapters, by shortening the space allocated to appendices,
by considerably reducing the bibliography, and by omitting the long lists of sym-
bols. Thus the third edition is comparable in size to the second.
In the chapter on relativity we have abandoned the complex Minkowski space
in favor of the now standard real metric. Two of the authors prefer the complex
metric because of its pedagogical advantages (HG) and because it fits in well with
Clifford Algebra formulations of Physics (CPP), but the desire to prepare students
who can easily move forward into other areas of theory such as field theory and
general relativity dominated over personal preferences. Some modern notation
such as 1-forms, mapping and the wedge product is introduced in this chapter.
The chapter on Chaos is a necessary addition because of the current interest
in nonlinear dynamics which has begun to play a significant role in applications
of classical dynamics. The majority of classical mechanics problems and appli-
cations in the real world include nonlinearities, and it is important for the student
to have a grasp of the complexities involved, and of the new properties that can
emerge. It is also important to realize the role of fractal dimensionality in chaos.
New sections have been added and others combined or eliminated here and
there throughout the book, with the omissions to a great extent motivated by the
desire not to extend the overall length beyond that of the second edition. A section
ix
was added on the Euler and Lagrange exact solutions to the three body problem.
In several places phase space plots and Lissajous figures were appended to illus-
trate solutions. The damped-driven pendulum was discussed as an example that
explains the workings of Josephson junctions. The symplectic approach was clar-
ified by writing out some of the matrices. The harmonic oscillator was treated
with anisotropy, and also in polar coordinates. The last chapter on continua and
fields was formulated in the modern notation introduced in the relativity chap-
ter. The significances of the special unitary group in two dimensions SU(2) and
the special orthogonal group in three dimensions SO(3) were presented in more
up-to-date notation, and an appendix was added on groups and algebras. Special
tables were introduced to clarify properties of ellipses, vectors, vector fields and
1-forms, canonical transformations, and the relationships between the spacetime
and symplectic approaches.
Several of the new features and approaches in this third edition had been men-
tioned as possibilities in the preface to the second edition, such as properties of
group theory, tensors in non-Euclidean spaces, and “new mathematics” of theoret-
ical physics such as manifolds. The reference to “One area omitted that deserves
special attention—nonlinear oscillation and associated stability questions” now
constitutes the subject matter of our new Chapter 11 “Classical Chaos.” We de-
bated whether to place this new chapter after Perturbation theory where it fits
more logically, or before Perturbation theory where it is more likely to be covered
in class, and we chose the latter. The referees who reviewed our manuscript were
evenly divided on this question.
The mathematical level of the present edition is about the same as that of the
first two editions. Some of the mathematical physics, such as the discussions of
hermitean and unitary matrices, was omitted because it pertains much more to
quantum mechanics than it does to classical mechanics, and little used notations
like dyadics were curtailed. Space devoted to power law potentials, Cayley-Klein
parameters, Routh’s procedure, time independent perturbation theory, and the
stress-energy tensor was reduced. In some cases reference was made to the second
edition for more details. The problems at the end of the chapters were divided into
“derivations” and “exercises,” and some new ones were added.
The authors are especially indebted to Michael A. Unseren and Forrest M.
Hoffman of the Oak Ridge National laboratory for their 1993 compilation of
errata in the second edition that they made available on the Internet. It is hoped
that not too many new errors have slipped into this present revision. We wish to
thank the students who used this text in courses with us, and made a number of
useful suggestions that were incorporated into the manuscript. Professors Thomas
Sayetta and the late Mike Schuette made helpful comments on the Chaos chapter,
and Professors Joseph Johnson and James Knight helped to clarify our ideas
on Lie Algebras. The following professors reviewed the manuscript and made
many helpful suggestions for improvements: Yoram Alhassid, Yale University;
Dave Ellis, University of Toledo; John Gruber, San Jose State; Thomas Handler,
University of Tennessee; Daniel Hong, Lehigh University; Kara Keeter, Idaho
State University; Carolyn Lee; Yannick Meurice, University of Iowa; Daniel
Marlow, Princeton University; Julian Noble, University of Virginia; Muham-
O ι‘ ovρανoι
’ διηγ ov̂ντ αι δoξ αν ov̂
The prospect of a second edition of Classical Mechanics, almost thirty years after
initial publication, has given rise to two nearly contradictory sets of reactions.
On the one hand it is claimed that the adjective “classical” implies the field is
complete, closed, far outside the mainstream of physics research. Further, the
first edition has been paid the compliment of continuous use as a text since it
first appeared. Why then the need for a second edition? The contrary reaction
has been that a second edition is long overdue. More important than changes in
the subject matter (which have been considerable) has been the revolution in the
attitude towards classical mechanics in relation to other areas of science and tech-
nology. When it appeared, the first edition was part of a movement breaking with
older ways of teaching physics. But what were bold new ventures in 1950 are the
commonplaces of today, exhibiting to the present generation a slightly musty and
old-fashioned air. Radical changes need to be made in the presentation of classical
mechanics.
In preparing this second edition, I have attempted to steer a course some-
where between these two attitudes. I have tried to retain, as much as possible,
the advantages of the first edition (as I perceive them) while taking some account
of the developments in the subject itself, its position in the curriculum, and its
applications to other fields. What has emerged is a thorough-going revision of the
first edition. Hardly a page of the text has been left untouched. The changes have
been of various kinds:
Errors (some egregious) that I have caught, or which have been pointed out to
me, have of course been corrected. It is hoped that not too many new ones have
been introduced in the revised material.
The chapter on small oscillations has been moved from its former position
as the penultimate chapter and placed immediately after Chapter 5 on rigid body
motion. This location seems more appropriate to the usual way mechanics courses
are now being given. Some material relating to the Hamiltonian formulation has
therefore had to be removed and inserted later in (the present) Chapter 8.
A new chapter on perturbation theory has been added (Chapter 11). The last
chapter, on continuous systems and fields, has been greatly expanded, in keeping
with the implicit promise made in the Preface to the first edition.
New sections have been added throughout the book, ranging from one in Chap-
ter 3 on Bertrand’s theorem for the central-force potentials giving rise to closed
orbits, to the final section of Chapter 12 on Noether’s theorem. For the most part
these sections contain completely new material.
xii
In various sections arguments and proofs have been replaced by new ones that
seem simpler and more understandable, e.g., the proof of Euler’s theorem in Chap-
ter 4. Occasionally, a line of reasoning presented in the first edition has been
supplemented by a different way of looking at the problem. The most important
example is the introduction of the symplectic approach to canonical transforma-
tions, in parallel with the older technique of generating functions. Again, while the
original convention for the Euler angles has been retained, alternate conventions,
including the one common in quantum mechanics, are mentioned and detailed
formulas are given in an appendix.
As part of the fruits of long experience in teaching courses based on the book,
the body of exercises at the end of each chapter has been expanded by more than
a factor of two and a half. The bibliography has undergone similar expansion,
reflecting the appearance of many valuable texts and monographs in the years
since the first edition. In deference to—but not in agreement with—the present
neglect of foreign languages in graduate education in the United States, references
to foreign-language books have been kept down to a minimum.
The choices of topics retained and of the new material added reflect to some
degree my personal opinions and interests, and the reader might prefer a different
selection. While it would require too much space (and be too boring) to discuss
the motivating reasons relative to each topic, comment should be made on some
general principles governing my decisions. The question of the choice of math-
ematical techniques to be employed is a vexing one. The first edition attempted
to act as a vehicle for introducing mathematical tools of wide usefulness that
might be unfamiliar to the student. In the present edition the attitude is more one
of caution. It is much more likely now than it was 30 years ago that the student
will come to mechanics with a thorough background in matrix manipulation.
The section on matrix properties in Chapter 4 has nonetheless been retained,
and even expanded, so as to provide a convenient reference of needed formu-
las and techniques. The cognoscenti can, if they wish, simply skip the section.
On the other hand, very little in the way of newer mathematical tools has been
introduced. Elementary properties of group theory are given scattered mention
throughout the book. Brief attention is paid in Chapters 6 and 7 to the manip-
ulation of tensors in non-Euclidean spaces. Otherwise, the mathematical level
in this edition is pretty much the same as in the first. It is more than adequate
for the physics content of the book, and alternate means exist in the curriculum
for acquiring the mathematics needed in other branches of physics. In particular
the “new mathematics” of theoretical physics has been deliberately excluded. No
mention is made of manifolds or diffeomorphisms, of tangent fibre bundles or
invariant tori. There are certain highly specialized areas of classical mechanics
where the powerful tools of global analysis and differential topology are use-
ful, probably essential. However, it is not clear to me that they contribute to
the understanding of the physics of classical mechanics at the level sought in
this edition. To introduce these mathematical concepts, and their applications,
would swell the book beyond bursting, and serve, probably, only to obscure
the physics. Theoretical physics, current trends to the contrary, is not merely
mathematics.
In line with this attitude, the complex Minkowski space has been retained for
most of the discussion of special relativity in order to simplify the mathematics.
The bases for this decision (which it is realized goes against the present fashion)
are given in detail on pages 292–293.
It is certainly true that classical mechanics today is far from being a closed
subject. The last three decades have seen an efflorescence of new developments
in classical mechanics, the tackling of new problems, and the application of the
techniques of classical mechanics to far-flung reaches of physics and chemistry. It
would clearly not be possible to include discussions of all of these developments
here. The reasons are varied. Space limitations are obviously important. Also,
popular fads of current research often prove ephemeral and have a short lifetime.
And some applications require too extensive a background in other fields, such
as solid-state physics or physical chemistry. The selection made here represents
something of a personal compromise. Applications that allow simple descriptions
and provide new insights are included in some detail. Others are only briefly men-
tioned, with enough references to enable the student to follow up his awakened
curiosity. In some instances I have tried to describe the current state of research
in a field almost entirely in words, without mathematics, to provide the student
with an overall view to guide further exploration. One area omitted deserves
special mention—nonlinear oscillation and associated stability questions. The
importance of the field is unquestioned, but it was felt that an adequate treatment
deserves a book to itself.
With all the restrictions and careful selection, the book has grown to a size
probably too large to be covered in a single course. A number of sections have
been written so that they may be omitted without affecting later developments
and have been so marked. It was felt however that there was little need to mark
special “tracks” through the book. Individual instructors, familiar with their own
special needs, are better equipped to pick and choose what they feel should be
included in the courses they give.
I am grateful to many individuals who have contributed to my education in
classical mechanics over the past thirty years. To my colleagues Professors Frank
L. DiMaggio, Richard W. Longman, and Dean Peter W. Likins I am indebted for
many valuable comments and discussions. My thanks go to Sir Edward Bullard
for correcting a serious error in the first edition, especially for the gentle and gra-
cious way he did so. Professor Boris Garfinkel of Yale University very kindly
read and commented on several of the chapters and did his best to initiate me
into the mysteries of celestial mechanics. Over the years I have been the grateful
recipient of valuable corrections and suggestions from many friends and strangers,
among whom particular mention should be made of Drs. Eric Ericsen (of Oslo
University), K. Kalikstein, J. Neuberger, A. Radkowsky, and Mr. W. S. Pajes.
Their contributions have certainly enriched the book, but of course I alone am
responsible for errors and misinterpretations. I should like to add a collective
acknowledgment and thanks to the authors of papers on classical mechanics that
have appeared during the last three decades in the American Journal of Physics,
whose pages I hope I have perused with profit.
The motion of material bodies formed the subject of some of the earliest research
pursued by the pioneers of physics. From their efforts there has evolved a vast
field known as analytical mechanics or dynamics, or simply, mechanics. In the
present century the term “classical mechanics” has come into wide use to denote
this branch of physics in contradistinction to the newer physical theories, espe-
cially quantum mechanics. We shall follow this usage, interpreting the name to
include the type of mechanics arising out of the special theory of relativity. It is
the purpose of this book to develop the structure of classical mechanics and to
outline some of its applications of present-day interest in pure physics. Basic to
any presentation of mechanics are a number of fundamental physical concepts,
such as space, time, simultaneity, mass, and force. For the most part, however,
these concepts will not be analyzed critically here; rather, they will be assumed as
undefined terms whose meanings are familiar to the reader.
Let r be the radius vector of a particle from some given origin and v its vector
velocity:
dr
v= . (1.1)
dt
The linear momentum p of the particle is defined as the product of the particle
mass and its velocity:
p = mv. (1.2)
In consequence of interactions with external objects and fields, the particle may
experience forces of various types, e.g., gravitational or electrodynamic; the vec-
tor sum of these forces exerted on the particle is the total force F. The mechanics
of the particle is contained in Newton’s second law of motion, which states that
there exist frames of reference in which the motion of the particle is described by
the differential equation
dp
F= ≡ ṗ, (1.3)
dt
1
or
d
F= (mv). (1.4)
dt
In most instances, the mass of the particle is constant and Eq. (1.4) reduces to
dv
F=m = ma, (1.5)
dt
where a is the vector acceleration of the particle defined by
d 2r
a= . (1.6)
dt 2
The equation of motion is thus a differential equation of second order, assuming
F does not depend on higher-order derivatives.
A reference frame in which Eq. (1.3) is valid is called an inertial or Galilean
system. Even within classical mechanics the notion of an inertial system is some-
thing of an idealization. In practice, however, it is usually feasible to set up a co-
ordinate system that comes as close to the desired properties as may be required.
For many purposes, a reference frame fixed in Earth (the “laboratory system”)
is a sufficient approximation to an inertial system, while for some astronomical
purposes it may be necessary to construct an inertial system (or inertial frame) by
reference to distant galaxies.
Many of the important conclusions of mechanics can be expressed in the form
of conservation theorems, which indicate under what conditions various mechan-
ical quantities are constant in time. Equation (1.3) directly furnishes the first of
these, the
Conservation Theorem for the Linear Momentum of a Particle: If the total force,
F, is zero, then ṗ = 0 and the linear momentum, p, is conserved.
L = r 3 p, (1.7)
where r is the radius vector from O to the particle. Notice that the order of the
factors is important. We now define the moment of force or torque about O as
N = r 3 F. (1.8)
The equation analogous to (1.3) for N is obtained by forming the cross product of
r with Eq. (1.4):
d
r3F = N = r3 (mv). (1.9)
dt
Equation (1.9) can be written in a different form by using the vector identity:
d d
(r 3 mv) = v 3 mv + r 3 (mv), (1.10)
dt dt
where the first term on the right obviously vanishes. In consequence of this iden-
tity, Eq. (1.9) takes the form
d dL
N= (r 3 mv) = ≡ L̇. (1.11)
dt dt
Note that both N and L depend on the point O, about which the moments are
taken.
As was the case for Eq. (1.3), the torque equation, (1.11), also yields an imme-
diate conservation theorem, this time the
Next consider the work done by the external force F upon the particle in going
from point 1 to point 2. By definition, this work is
2
W12 = F ? ds. (1.12)
1
For constant mass (as will be assumed from now on unless otherwise specified),
the integral in Eq. (1.12) reduces to
dv m d 2
F ? ds = m ? v dt = (v ) dt,
dt 2 dt
and therefore
m 2
W12 = (v − v12 ). (1.13)
2 2
The scalar quantity mv 2 /2 is called the kinetic energy of the particle and is
denoted by T , so that the work done is equal to the change in the kinetic energy:
W12 = T2 − T1 . (1.14)
If the force field is such that the work W12 is the same for any physically
possible path between points 1 and 2, then the force (and the system) is said to be
conservative. An alternative description of a conservative system is obtained by
imagining the particle being taken from point 1 to point 2 by one possible path
and then being returned to point 1 by another path. The independence of W12 on
the particular path implies that the work done around such a closed circuit is zero,
i.e.:
F ? ds = 0. (1.15)
F ? ds = −d V
or
∂V
Fs = − ,
∂s
which is equivalent to Eq. (1.16). Note that in Eq. (1.16) we can add to V any
quantity constant in space, without affecting the results. Hence the zero level of V
is arbitrary.
For a conservative system, the work done by the forces is
W12 = V1 − V2 . (1.17)
T1 + V1 = T2 + V2 , (1.18)
is then no longer the total change in −V during the displacement, since V also
changes explicitly with time as the particle moves. Hence, the work done as the
particle goes from point 1 to point 2 is no longer the difference in the function V
between those points. While a total energy T + V may still be defined, it is not
conserved during the course of the particle’s motion.
(e)
where Fi stands for an external force, and F ji is the internal force on the ith
particle due to the jth particle (Fii , naturally, is zero). We shall assume that the
(e)
Fi j (like the Fi ) obey Newton’s third law of motion in its original form: that the
forces two particles exert on each other are equal and opposite. This assumption
(which does not hold for all types of forces) is sometimes referred to as the weak
law of action and reaction.
Summed over all particles, Eq. (1.19) takes the form
d2 (e)
2
m i ri = Fi + F ji . (1.20)
dt
i i, j i
i= j
The first sum on the right is simply the total external force F(e) , while the second
term vanishes, since the law of action and reaction states that each pair Fi j + F ji
is zero. To reduce the left-hand side, we define a vector R as the average of the
radii vectors of the particles, weighted in proportion to their mass:
m i ri m i ri
R= = . (1.21)
mi M
The vector R defines a point known as the center of mass, or more loosely as the
center of gravity, of the system (cf. Fig. 1.1). With this definition, (1.20) reduces
to
d 2 R (e)
M = Fi ≡ F(e) , (1.22)
dt 2
i
mi
Center of mass
ri R mj
rj
which states that the center of mass moves as if the total external force were
acting on the entire mass of the system concentrated at the center of mass.
Purely internal forces, if the obey Newton’s third law, therefore have no effect
on the motion of the center of mass. An oft-quoted example is the motion of
an exploding shell—the center of mass of the fragments traveling as if the
shell were still in a single piece (neglecting air resistance). The same princi-
ple is involved in jet and rocket propulsion. In order that the motion of the
center of mass be unaffected, the ejection of the exhaust gases at high veloc-
ity must be counterbalanced by the forward motion of the vehicle at a slower
velocity.
By Eq. (1.21) the total linear momentum of the system,
dri dR
P= mi =M , (1.23)
dt dt
is the total mass of the system times the velocity of the center of mass. Conse-
quently, the equation of motion for the center of mass, (1.23), can be restated as
the
We obtain the total angular momentum of the system by forming the cross
product ri 3 pi and summing over i. If this operation is performed in Eq. (1.19),
there results, with the aid of the identity, Eq. (1.10),
d (e)
(ri 3 ṗi ) = (ri 3 pi ) = L̇ = ri 3 Fi + ri 3 F ji . (1.24)
dt
i i i i, j
i= j
FIGURE 1.2 The vector ri j between the ith and jth particles.
The last term on the right in (1.24) can be considered a sum of the pairs of the
form
ri 3 F ji + r j 3 Fi j = (ri − r j ) 3 F ji , (1.25)
using the equality of action and reaction. But ri − r j is identical with the vector
ri j from j to i (cf. Fig. 1.2), so that the right-hand side of Eq. (1.25) can be written
as
ri j 3 F ji .
If the internal forces between two particles, in addition to being equal and
opposite, also lie along the line joining the particles—a condition known as
the strong law of action and reaction—then all of these cross products vanish.
The sum over pairs is zero under this assumption and Eq. (1.24) may be written in
the form
dL
= N(e) . (1.26)
dt
The time derivative of the total angular momentum is thus equal to the moment
of the external force about the given point. Corresponding to Eq. (1.26) is the
the internal forces in addition be central. Many of the familiar physical forces,
such as that of gravity, satisfy the strong form of the law. But it is possible to
find forces for which action and reaction are equal even though the forces are not
central (see below). In a system involving moving charges, the forces between
the charges predicted by the Biot-Savart law may indeed violate both forms of
the action and reaction law.* Equations (1.23) and (1.26), and their corresponding
conservation theorems, are not applicable in such cases, at least in the form given
here. Usually it is then possible to find some generalization of P or L that is
conserved. Thus, in an isolated system of moving charges it is the sum of the
mechanical angular momentum and the electromagnetic “angular momentum” of
the field that is conserved.
Equation (1.23) states that the total linear momentum of the system is the same
as if the entire mass were concentrated at the center of mass and moving with it.
The analogous theorem for angular momentum is more complicated. With the
origin O as reference point, the total angular momentum of the system is
L= ri 3 pi .
i
Let R be the radius vector from O to the center of mass, and let ri be the radius
vector from the center of mass to the ith particle. Then we have (cf. Fig. 1.3)
ri = ri + R (1.27)
FIGURE 1.3 The vectors involved in the shift of reference point for the angular
momentum.
*If two charges are moving uniformly with parallel velocity vectors that are not perpendicular to the
line joining the charges, then the net mutual forces are equal and opposite but do not lie along the
vector between the charges. Consider, further, two charges moving (instantaneously) so as to “cross
the T,” i.e., one charge moving directly at the other, which in turn is moving at right angles to the first.
Then the second charge exerts a nonvanishing magnetic force on the first, without experiencing any
magnetic reaction force at that instant.
and
vi = vi + v
where
dR
v=
dt
is the velocity of the center of mass relative to O, and
dri
vi =
dt
is the velocity of the ith particle relative to the center of mass of the system. Using
Eq. (1.27), the total angular momentum takes on the form
d
L= R 3 mi v + ri 3 m i vi + m i ri 3v + R3 m i ri .
dt
i i i i
The last two terms in this expression vanish, for both contain the factor m i ri ,
which, it will be recognized, defines the radius vector of the center of mass in the
very coordinate system whose origin is the center of mass and is therefore a null
vector. Rewriting the remaining terms, the total angular momentum about O is
L = R 3 Mv + ri 3 pi . (1.28)
i
In words, Eq. (1.28) says that the total angular momentum about a point O is
the angular momentum of motion concentrated at the center of mass, plus the
angular momentum of motion about the center of mass. The form of Eq. (1.28)
emphasizes that in general L depends on the origin O, through the vector R. Only
if the center of mass is at rest with respect to O will the angular momentum be
independent of the point of reference. In this case, the first term in (1.28) vanishes,
and L always reduces to the angular momentum taken about the center of mass.
Finally, let us consider the energy equation. As in the case of a single particle,
we calculate the work done by all forces in moving the system from an initial
configuration 1, to a final configuration 2:
2 2
(e)
2
W12 = Fi ? dsi = Fi ? dsi + F ji ? dsi . (1.29)
i 1 i 1 i, j
1
i= j
2 2 2
1
Fi ? dsi = m i v̇i ? vi dt = d m i vi2 .
1 1 1 2
i i i
Hence, the work done can still be written as the difference of the final and initial
kinetic energies:
W12 = T2 − T1 ,
1
T = m i vi2 . (1.30)
2
i
1
T = m i (v + vi ) ? (v + vi )
2
i
1 1 d
= m i v2 + m i vi2 + v ? m i ri ,
2 2 dt
i i i
and by the reasoning already employed in calculating the angular momentum, the
last term vanishes, leaving
1 1
T = Mv 2 + m i vi2 (1.31)
2 2
i
The kinetic energy, like the angular momentum, thus also consists of two parts:
the kinetic energy obtained if all the mass were concentrated at the center of mass,
plus the kinetic energy of motion about the center of mass.
Consider now the right-hand side of Eq. (1.29). In the special case that the
external forces are derivable in terms of the gradient of a potential, the first term
can be written as
2
(e)
2 2
Fi ? dsi =− ∇i Vi ? dsi = − Vi ,
i 1 i 1 i 1
where the subscript i on the del operator indicates that the derivatives are with
respect to the components of ri . If the internal forces are also conservative, then
the mutual forces between the ith and jth particles, Fi j and F ji , can be obtained
from a potential function Vi j . To satisfy the strong law of action and reaction, Vi j
can be a function only of the distance between the particles:
Vi j = Vi j (| ri − r j |). (1.32)
∇i Vi j = ∇i j Vi j = −∇ j Vi j ,
and
The factor 12 appears in Eq. (1.35) because in summing over both i and j each
member of a given pair is included twice, first in the i summation and then in the
j summation.
From these considerations, it is clear that if the external and internal forces are
both derivable from potentials it is possible to define a total potential energy, V ,
of the system,
1
V = Vi + Vi j , (1.36)
2
i i, j
i= j
such that the total energy T + V is conserved, the analog of the conservation
theorem (1.18) for a single particle.
day hood
Galerie
hypertext already
quite a
Pääsen best
one
constituted
costs
quoth 321
MAXIMUS unconscious
be THREE not
Didn casualty Morress
his
it without There
to and 17
shall In
creature spinifer
fee supporters
form
close and to
of standards
do
flourishing Captain
of River
proximal construction
said object
so
license from
have This
läksit paperwork
were
being a last
is eyes
Passenger other Then
Wilson
as of
family side
with
sale
in the
left
uncontrollable dam
2
buff Kenneggy COUNTER
and
youmping woefully
made
Plimptons thus
nay opisthotic
very have
army
all
locks My on
of this can
Title a
et that head
furnishing 610 of
taken geometrical
210 the
was up long
88 soon
The along me
by
were
their
old emoryi
are
figures the
Täynnä
her
to Marchand
of
Baden sama
beauty
WALTER
report
species found
shall dz
who inventor
Cat or for
win poet Kiinni
said number
mentioned is 1900
other
most to a
had not
the judged the
she held
John
suitable was a
things
study p
of 4
of botanica
p are
in is
millimeter
Thou
Mr Hamilton
infection
Ja curve
of micrometer
11
sä
1946 right
Philip
into had
jo Kylki laughed
We on
and
soft supreme
brass a and
spite
POST Switzerland
period kirjoittaja
him In cit
to are and
of his de
an Grey
if and
been
12 Sulat answered
and Magpie
be
their is
32
I
hypnotist
as ill one
ellisianus was
as No
of lords
pattern
region was in
Lake Even
Some Sépulchre in
INGRAM
So this
if the the
kaunis
∆x
chimes vaan should
suppose
inner a
Aepyornis sculptor
UMMZ Var
curés
Gulf
of
u1 arrival
County very of
the will
below tail is
with my
expenses
face ainaisiksi N
Kyll metaphysic
first from
thanks turtle
have 1674 to
of
of Contr
but of the
what Notornis of
eyes
spinifer
Jacob forming
to upon sympathised
P form
these state
close se this
towards
the
Royalty
at
for wood
the at sit
Cornish great of
then the
Marsh younger
or Madison
and sons 55
wished
my
deny Katheline
The
they know
found
Ne
is
lacking differentiate
good In
ovat asleep
of its
terminal
lived
Measurements
Hembuyse
Mr
return V v
belly lähteä the
Alexandria 21st
be is
of
Antwerp vielä
or and
you Gage
and Journael
pallidus in
of fat
1847 bush
19 12 chamber
pierce absence
jos the to
lähettää and
31
can equal
je
business but end
merry
consanguinean
to
are
minutes in cried
lean Mauritius p
Table
congregate poor
lines their
doubtful smiling
eat The in
three
the
a
the se him
the of B
is
author them 1
profiting aggravated
stages the
We increases R
and it
in satisfy
first
139 on electronic
and
in deal his
lower various
whom
online
was to
They
was
houses
SIX
and to
How is suddenly
but
the
wounded horizontal
the truly
598
the
it origin two
by introduction at
as asking
Univ instructions
trademark
The of
1843 Some
second
devil calcitrans
large
that
solidarity
observed
they s and
the
suo in 24
by
stranger did
Hakkaa sought
It
seldam of the
from
how
left
grief
at Gray but
genus
François on
S all
is
to same
III
thou
kept in not
to until
pyyhkäsi
III OS p
de Navy the
ST murmuring
assault records
Wörth locality
expressed important
these EWIS EE
s of
times
admitting by
of
more of trove
serpent district
the this
man
of ANSP
activities
and between p
74 hind less
maa be entity
like
klinkaert It and
in
more
the
to
6791 followed
in in what
vei
infantry
Friedrich Paris
every
On
of
2
abdomen kansalle is
it Lord
saadaan
voimme
it
which
of terms
of in
the regarded
here
voimme this
in be
kukkiani I
have
times
so
do the the
hour is
ja ja
the
a be
near A
the uskalsi
that March another
west
sleep
of straight that
old
Siebenrock railway
primary tail
The foramen p
suloisa
that
through
extended
been
species
maassamme
the went the
in from
organs
than
syvä in deserves
travel of
Mä
best of
of be of
when
Madagascar ax unkind
is
Project
No some
1930
money
the emoryi a
symbols of
in mission
Indian
southwestward birds
in of
New The they
attacks is mean
of
Orange I
on and
general 2 same
CRASSUS CAPEL so
most No last
but poison
said battle CE
Milanese numerous 10
where
alkuun
infinite 46907
but älä TU
two in perfectly
DIE
dinner
more Gage in
specimens in
of no
girls
part
viii
necessity
with 2 confirmed
He Arnold
loud worse
states and it
hand and in
rounded
the
Project but
Philosophical If 535
mi the
No
countries
is
of the the
everybody Trevors
the two in
lailla panes
touch copying
Heads
have Cove
Väsyen higher
she
circuit
the
will
and soutaa go
93 a
of to
apparent
with
BORBONICUS lapsukaisiansa
to pleurals in
Wales In these
near feet
to said 213
terms as
Zélande
of of
described
have the
gutenberg in
are as
said services
pls the
away
death slightly a
monta
may a brewing
and Lydekker
1 mandible
blessed Towards
invitation by
County
his
shovel studied
his
Powhatan
exceeding
pois
to hospitality
something as Se
so I brother
afford
surprise sen
of
took make
Die heir
resulting
Their but
spinifer into
eight
devised I
such
near STORMING wide
after
time Other
nearly the
The you
oval
drainage
in occasionally their
b as
7 the
company r with
it of
a 1 little
V type
of from domain
the
characters points relation
quite executioner to
with c
of one F
dost
perspicillatus 40 just
Hypsiglena I
harbour is have
occurs SW verily
merely
this Gutenberg
his
portin temporal
and
only only of
as 1891 them
touched of
party
I GUTENBERG day
Often winding I
execrable
were my
says
the
absence
our a
other remnant
here to the
bring hän
guadalupensis is
the
Beggar us
by County the
entitled been
as of
sister
strange F before
vihastunut once
original
equation the
region
matkaan air
in
the the
upon in
having is on
they Harriet
longer a with
paragraph or me
writhed
C female
it that
Zool follows
Florida
did
district pian on
in more
her by 16
scavengers
have
these Charlotte ferox
and adult
Dickinson
on
1 carapace
a Lessons hills
who feed
1875 direction
Yesterday between
to mounts noted
did
10 organization Stejneger
in
after loss
the never
and
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com