(Ebook) Management and Language: The Manager As A Practical Author by David Holman Richard Thorpe ISBN 9780857026460, 0857026461 PDF Download
(Ebook) Management and Language: The Manager As A Practical Author by David Holman Richard Thorpe ISBN 9780857026460, 0857026461 PDF Download
https://ebooknice.com/product/management-and-language-the-manager-
as-a-practical-author-51630512
★★★★★
4.6 out of 5.0 (94 reviews )
DOWNLOAD PDF
ebooknice.com
(Ebook) Management and Language : The Manager As a Practical
Author by David Holman; Richard Thorpe ISBN 9780857026460,
0857026461 Pdf Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebooknice.com/product/into-the-waves-22980826
https://ebooknice.com/product/on-the-trail-22980914
https://ebooknice.com/product/under-the-lagoon-22981162
https://ebooknice.com/product/the-social-worker-as-manager-a-practical-
guide-to-success-28715202
(Ebook) Practical cookery for the level 1 diploma by David
Foskett; Patricia Paskins; Steve Thorpe ISBN 9781444187502,
1444187503
https://ebooknice.com/product/practical-cookery-for-the-
level-1-diploma-10944060
https://ebooknice.com/product/management-and-business-research-5th-
edition-7410422
https://ebooknice.com/product/management-and-business-research-49185598
https://ebooknice.com/product/handbook-of-addictive-disorders-a-practical-
guide-to-diagnosis-and-treatment-2088580
https://ebooknice.com/product/far-from-shore-22980750
Management and Language
Copyrighted Material
Copyrighted Material
Management and Language
The Manager as a Practical Author
SAGE Publications
London • Thousand Oaks • New Delhi
Copyrighted Material
© David Holman and Richard Thorpe 2003
ISBN 0 7 6 1 9 6907 1
ISBN (pbk)O 7 6 1 9 6908 X
Copyrighted Material
I would like to thank my parents,
Annette and Bob Holman,
for all their support throughout my life.
David.
Copyrighted Material
Copyrighted Material
Contents
Copyrighted Material
viii M a n a g e m e n t a n d La n g u a g e
Author index 19 1
Copyrighted Material
About the editors
David J. Hol man is a Research Fellow at the Centre for Organisation and
Innovation, which is part of the Institute of Work Psychology, University of
Sheffield. After graduating in psychology at Manchester Polytechnic, he
worked as Psychological Technician supporting people with learning dis
abilities at home and at work. He then went back to academia and completed
a Diploma in Personnel Management at Manchester Polytechnic. It was
during this period that he met Richard Thorpe, who was to become his
supervisor on his PhD that examined the experience of skill development in
undergraduates on management courses.
On completing his PhD, David joined the Institute of Work Psychology
where his research focuses on the affects of job design on employee well
being, learning and innovation. He has maintained an interest in manage
ment education and development and has continued to work with Richard
Thorpe in this area. David is the co-editor of The New Workplace: A Guide
to the Human Impact of Modern Technology and Working Practices and has
published in j ournals such as Human Relations, the Journal of Occupational
and Organisational Psychology, the Journal of Occupational Health Psychol
ogy, Management Learning and the British Journal of Management.
Copyrighted Material
x Ma n a g e m e n t a n d L a n g u a g e
Copyrighted Material
Contributors
Copyrighted Material
Figures and tables
Copyrighted Material
Introduction
Management and language:
the manager as a practical author
In response, one might offer a range of suggestions, e.g., consider this, notice
that, think of that, or even make a number of prescriptions, e.g., do this, do
that. Whether instructive or prescriptive, the comments made in the ensuing
discussion would probably be informed by one's personal experience and
knowledge of management practice.
Another significant factor informing a person's response to questions
such as those above would be his or her beliefs about how managers should
approach their practice, i.e., a perceived ideal of managerial action. For
example, one person might suggest that a manager should proceed like a
scientist, by being as rational and objective as possible, by constructing and
testing hypotheses and by applying general principles and theories. A person
advocating such a view could be seen as having a scientific/technical under
standing of managerial action, and an image of the manager as a practical
scientist ( Alvesson and Willmott, 1 996; Holman, 2000a; Reed, 1 98 9 ) .
Another person might quote Mintzberg, who stated that 'brief observation of
any manager will quickly lay to rest the notion that managers practise a
science' ( 1 999: 302 ) , and argue that this 'scientific' ideal is practically
impossible to achieve and not particularly useful even if it was. Rather, they
might suggest that a manager can proceed by reflecting closely on the social
and political processes of organisational life and on one's personal knowl
edge of the situation, and use the insights gained from this to transform the
Copyrighted Material
2 Management and Language
situation rather than simply test a hypothesis on it. This person might be seen
as having a 'practice' perspective of management and an image of the
manager as a 'reflective practitioner' ( Reed, 1 9 89; Schon, 1 98 3 ) . 1
The 'scientific/technical' and the 'practice' perspective o f management,
and their associated images of the manager (respectively, the manager as
practical scientist and the manager as reflective practitioner), have been
highly influential in the study and practice of management. However, within
the practice perspective there has been a growing interest in how language is
used in organisational practice - sometimes referred to as the 'linguistic turn'
(Jablin and Putnam, 200 1 ; Westwood and Linstead, 200 1 ) . Thus, another
person in a discussion on how a manager might proceed, might agree with
the advocate of the practice perspective, but argue that the manager needs to
play closer attention to the way that language is used to shape the organisa
tional landscape in ambiguous and uncertain conditions. She or he might
argue that closer attention to language use is important, as it is the primary
means through which managerial action occurs and with which organisa
tions are created, maintained and changed. This person, while also coming
from a practice perspective of management, might suggest an alternative
image of the manager, and one that conj ures up more linguistic connotations,
namely, the manager as a 'practical author' (Shotter, 1 99 3 ) .2
The aim of this book, then, is to examine what it might mean to be a
practical author and to show how it applies to different facets of managerial
life. However, to show why we believe this idea to be valuable and timely, we
first provide a more detailed account of how it relates to the two other
dominant images of management, the manager as a practical scientist and the
manager as a reflective practitioner. We then go on to examine the linguistic
turn in management and organisational studies. Finally, we show how
Shotter's idea of the manager as a practical author resonates with many of
the concerns and themes in this linguistic turn.
Perhaps the most dominant image of management has been the manager as a
scientist or practical scientist ( Kolb, 1 9 8 4 ) and a scientific/technical perspec
tive of management has underpinned this image. From a scientific/technical
perspective, managerial activity is characterised as a rational, technical and
morally neutral process of planning, controlling and decision-making aimed
at securing the organisations ends through the efficient use of administrative,
human and productive resources ( Reed, 1 9 8 9 ) . These activities are thought to
be most effective, and the aims of management most likely to be achieved,
when based on 'hard' information and grounded in the rigorous application
of scientifically validated knowledge and techniques. Furthermore, the 'best'
managers are seen to act according to a hypothetico-deductive scientific
Copyrighted Material
I ntroduction 3
model of action, i.e., that action should involve constructing and testing
hypotheses and applying general principles and theories to problems (Schon,
1 98 3 ) .
The image o f the manager a s scientist has 'exerted a powerful influence
on the development of management thought' ( Reed, 1 98 9 : 74 ). Indeed,
through the influence of writers such as Frederick Taylor, management
thought was largely founded on the belief that managerial activity should be
akin to scientific activity. It is perhaps of no surprise then that management
education, particularly during its postwar expansion, sought to teach man
agement as a scientifically based practice and teach only those ideas and
techniques that had been scientifically validated. There are also numerous
examples of managers using the image and aura of science when trying to
j ustify, legitimate and account for actions made (Pavlica, 1 996; Watson,
1 994).
The idea that managers ( or the 'best' managers) act in a scientific manner
and the ideal of management as a scientific practice has been subject to a
sustained, and some would say fatal, critique. One 'nail in the coffin' has
come from studies of management activity that have pointed to the fact that
managerial work is characterised by brevity, fragmentation, a fast pace, a
high degree of informal interpersonal contact and much ritual activity (Hales,
1 9 86; Kotter, 1 9 82; Stewart, 1 967; Mintzberg, 1 973 ) . Such studies have also
highlighted the social and political nature of managerial work. Moreover,
they have demonstrated that managers often have to make sense of and take
action in ambiguous and contradictory conditions in which both the means
and ends of action are highly uncertain. These descriptions of managerial
activity seem far removed from the image of the manager as scientist and this
alternative view of managerial activity, i.e., as a pragmatic, social and polit
ical activity, can be labelled a 'practice perspective'. It is worth noting that
'critical' perspectives of management also share this view of management
action, although they are more explicit about understanding management
within its wider social, historical and economic context and with examining
the ends of management practice.
It could be argued that even if managers do not act according to the ideal of
management as a scientific activity, this does not necessarily mean that the
ideal is a poor one and that it should not be adhered to. The proponents of
this view might suggest that the problem does not lie in the theory but in its
execution. Yet, even the ideal of management as a scientific activity has come
under attack. One of the most notable of these critiques comes from Schon
( 1 9 8 3 ) in his book The Reflective Practitioner. In this highly influential work,
Copyrighted Material
4 Ma n a g e m e n t a n d L a n g u a g e
Schon argues strongly against the ideal o f professional and managerial activ
ity as a scientific and technical activity. Schon suggests that such a model,
based on what he calls a technical rationality, is inappropriate for many
professional activities. For Schon, a 'technical rationality holds that practi
tioners are instrumental problem solvers who select technical means best
suited to particular purposes. Rigorous professional practitioners solve well
formed instrumental problems by applying theory and technique derived
from systematic, preferably scientific knowledge' ( 1 9 8 3 : 3-4 ) . Schon demon
strates that one of the main difficulties of a technical rationality is its assump
tion that, when a person is confronted by a problem, the problem is already
fairly well defined. Yet, many of the situations and problems that managers
have to contend with are not well defined but uncertain, messy and ambig
uous. In these situations the problem is not just problem solving but also
problem setting. In other words, the issue is not just 'What techniques do
I use? ' but also 'What is the problem with which I am faced?' A further
assumption of a technical rationality is that the knowledge or means with
which to solve a problem can be applied to it in a relatively easy manner.
However, even when a problem has been defined and 'set', the outcome may
still escape the categories of applied science as the problem may be multi
faceted, unique and riven with value conflicts. Simply applying scientific
knowledge and technique to a problem may therefore prove problematic.
Schon is also critical of the notion that technical problem solving
requires an objective stance, that it involves acting in a way that is akin to
hypothesis-driven testing and experimentation, and that it is primarily con
cerned with the implementation and testing of technical decisions. Thus,
according to a technical rationality, a manager can be viewed as someone
who manipulates a situation from the outside, like a scientist observing
experiments in a laboratory. Yet serious doubts can be raised about whether a
person could ever 'step outside' of their worldview, as such a belief misses the
fact that the manager is embedded within his or her situation and that it is
their experientially derived knowledge from within a context ( i .e., their
social, political and cultural knowledge) that is essential for successful action.
Schon therefore stresses the importance of attending to the social and polit
ical context in which problem setting, problem solving and knowledge appli
cation occurs - something that a technical rationality tends to ignore or
downplay. A further consequence of a technical rationality is that the social
and political abilities required in these processes can sometimes be viewed as
less important. Indeed, personalities and politics are often blamed for the
failure of managerial activities, instead of recognising that it was possibly
failure to address the interests of different individuals and groups that helped
to undermine the potential 'success' of managerial activity.
Schon argues that activity could be approached differently. He labels this
different approach 'reflection-in-action' and those who practise it, 'reflective
practitioners'. Reflection-in-action is considered to be particularly appro
priate for guiding action in unique and uncertain situations and to have a
number of important characteristics. One characteristic is a focus on problem
Copyrighted Material
I n t r o d u ct i o n 5
setting, i.e., the need to frame a situation and 'impose' an order on it. In this
process the reflective practitioner is not dependent upon established theory
but employs an array of personal knowledge, theoretical knowledge, heu
ristics and techniques. Furthermore, the person attempts to actively trans
form or create a new situation - action goes beyond testing existing
knowledge. Moreover, in reflection-in-action, problem setting and transfor
mation are intertwined and, as such, knowing and doing and means and ends
are not held to be separate and distinct entities.3 Schon also suggests that
engaging in reflection-in-action is like having a reflective conversation with
the situation. By making this comparison, he draws attention to the inher
ently social nature of practice and many of his examples show how
reflection-in-action occurs through discussion. Another important character
istic of reflection-in-action is that it recognises that practice is embedded in a
context of meanings. This highlights the need to attend to the contextually
specific nature of one's own and others' understandings. It also highlights
the limits of one's personal understanding and, in particular, that others with
different commitments may not share the 'compellingness' of one's personal
knowledge.
With regard to the study and practice of management, Schon's work
provided a powerful and cogent argument that professional activity could be
modelled on principles different to those emanating from a scientific!
technical perspective. In addition, Schon provided a powerful metaphor, the
reflective practitioner, which could act as guiding ideal. Indeed, the idea of
the reflective practitioner has been widely adopted in many spheres and in the
field of management it resonated especially well with the practice and critical
perspectives of management. This resonance occurred because they each
emphasise how practitioners deal with messy and ambiguous problems,
because they each highlight the social and political nature of practice and
because they all share a subjectivist epistemology. Studies of management
emanating from a practice perspective also highlighted that managers
engaged in little reflective activity, something for which managers were often
criticised. Schon's notion of the reflective practitioner could therefore be held
up to managers as an exemplary model of professional activity and, impor
tantly, as a model that was in tune with the difficulties faced by managers in
their everyday lives.
Since Schon's work on the reflective practitioner, ideas about the nature of
management have progressed. From within the practice perspective of man
agement, greater attention has been given to the nature, role and function of
language in organisational life (Jablin and Putnam, 200 1 ; Westwood and
Copyrighted Material
6 M a n a g e m e n t a n d La n g u a g e
Linstead, 200 1 ) . For example, studies have looked a t how linguistic resour
ces, such as stories, metaphors and discourses, are used to construct notions
of management, leadership and self-identity ( Calas and Smircich, 1 99 1 ;
Townley, 1 993; Watson, 1 994). Other studies have attempted to understand
how language-based constructs (e.g., scripts, schema, cognitive maps, frames)
are used to make sense of the organisation and how they guide action
( Fairhurst and Sarr, 1 996; Gioia et aI., 1 989; Huff, 1 990). There has also
been an emphasis on how social practices (e.g., negotiation, storytelling,
rituals, teamwork, persuasion, arguments) and symbols (e.g., totems, myths,
sagas) are structured and unfold over time (Boje, 1 99 1 ; Gersick, 1 9 89;
Holman, 2000b ) . Yet another area of interest has centred on how these
different linguistic resources and social practices are employed by organisa
tional members to create, maintain and alter 'the organisation' ( Bastien et aI.,
1 995; Boden, 1 994; Donnellon et aI., 1 9 86; Fairhurst, 1 993; Ford and Ford,
1 994; McPhee, 1 989; Weick, 1 995). An assumption in these studies is that
language use is central to the generation of the organising process. Indeed, for
some, language is the very thing with which organisations are constituted
(Taylor and Van Every, 2000) and organisations are likened metaphorically
to texts ( Putnam et aI., 1 996; Tompkins et aI., 1 9 8 9 ) .
The linguistic turn in organisation and management studies has been
prompted, in part, by the increasing influence of social constructionist ideas
about reality, knowledge, language and communication; ideas that differ
from those underlying the traditionally dominant scientific/technical approa
ches. Thus, scientific/technical approaches to management and organisational
theory have assumed that reality is objective and that valid knowledge
reflects this reality ( Burrell and Morgan, 1 979). Flowing from this is the idea
that language is predominantly a system of representation, i.e., depicting
reality, objects, rules, norms, etc. In organisational studies, this has meant
that there has tended to be a focus on the conditions needed for effective
communication ( often conceptualised as information exchange) within
organisations and the interpersonal skills/abilities needed for effective com
munication ( Deetz, 200 1 ) . Furthermore, language and communication has
generally been viewed as one explanatory factor among many. On the other
hand, the linguistic turn has placed language use at the centre of organisa
tional and managerial life. Language use is considered to be one of the key
phenomena to be studied. This change was prompted, in large part, by the
view that social reality is socially constructed and that social interaction is an
essential part of this process (Berger and Luckmann, 1966). Language is not,
therefore, just a system of representation used to exchange information.
Rather, language is predominantly performative, productive and formative.
In other words, language does things, it makes things happen and it gives
form to reality ( Austin, 1 962; Garfinkel, 1 967).
For organisational and management studies, this means that language
use is seen to be the means through and with which organising and managing
occur. Psychology too has not been unaffected by the linguistic turn and the
Copyrighted Material
I n t ro d u c t i o n 7
Copyrighted Material
8 Management a n d Language
Copyrighted Material
I ntroduction 9
that managers can employ and important aspects of any story are the charac
ters in it and the identities of those characters. Chapter 3, by David Holman,
Jeff Gold and Richard Thorpe, proposes a relational approach to identity. In
particular, the chapter explores how identity is important in shaping action,
how a relational understanding of identity might improve one's understand
ing of how organisational practices unfold and explores the links between a
relational understanding of identity and practical authorship. Until this
point, much of the focus has been on words, but not all stories are told in
words. Cartoons, pictures and diagrams are all means with which a story can
be told or enhanced. In chapter 4, Richard Thorpe and Joep Cornelisson
address these issues and look at some of the ways in which visual media can
be employed to aid the process of practical authorship.
While Part 2 concentrates on how practical authors can use language
and visual media to gain a better understanding of themselves and the work
context, Part 3 looks at some of the ways in which language can be used
more prospectively to create and restore flows of action. In chapter 5,
Francois Cooren and Gail Fairhurst start by drawing attention to the impor
tance of narrative in understanding organisational action. They then combine
this with actor-network theory ( Latour, 1 996) to demonstrate how leaders
can accommodate the multiple perspectives of those in an organisation and
translate them into new inclusive landscapes of action. In other words, they
provide a detailed insight into one way in which a practical author's position
can be created, developed and used to shape the flow of action within
organisations.
Shotter ( 1 993) also suggests that practical authors need to argue persua
sively for the landscapes of action that they propose. Chapter 6, by Shirley
Willihnganz, Joy Hart and Charles Willard, therefore concentrates on the
different ways that arguments can be made in an organisation. Based on
O'Keefe's ( 1 9 8 8 ) theory of Message Design Logistics, they suggest that being
a practical author requires the rhetorical and argumentative skills that are
unique to a Rhetorical Message Design Logic. In this logic, argument is seen
as a cooperative, negotiated and creative dialogue that can generate new
responses to situations and reframe situations to allow room for action rather
than impasse. Another important feature of the argumentative process is that
it creates a shared space where incompatible agendas are acknowledged and,
possibly, reconciled. Thus, as in the chapters by Boje and Cooren and Fair
hurst, the need to recognise and accommodate alternative perspectives is
highlighted as an important factor in moving organisational action forward
and as central to organisational ethics.
The need to engage constructively with different perspectives means that
an ability to negotiate between them is paramount. In chapter 7, Stanley
Deetz draws attention to how identity, social orders (e.g., organisational
practices), knowledge and policies are negotiated products. He argues that
managers are sometimes 'guilty' of trying to stabilise the meanings of these
facets or acting as if meanings were fixed. This, he argues, is counter
productive, as it prevents individuals and organisations from creating new
Copyrighted Material
10 Management and Language
Notes
1 The two perspectives of management described here are derived from those
offered by Reed ( 1 98 9 ) and Alvesson and Willmott ( 1 99 6 ) . The 'scientific!
technical' perspective is derived from Reed's 'technical' and Alvesson and Will
mott's 'technocratic' perspectives of management. The 'practice' perspective is
similar to Reed's 'political' and Alvesson and Willmott's 'progressive' per
spectives. It must be noted, however, that Reed also uses the practice perspective
to denote an understanding of management that subsumes technical, political and
critical perspectives. That is not the intention here. The term practice is preferred
to political and progressive as it emphasises that this perspective is rooted in
empirical studies of managerial practice. The term practice is also preferred as
political is thought to be too narrow an understanding of the social practices
involved in management. The critical perspective is derived from the 'critical'
perspectives of Reed and Alvesson and Willmott.
2 As we locate the practical author within a practice perspective, we see it as
complementing the notion of the reflective practitioner and not as some compet
ing alternative.
3 Schon describes a range of practices through which problem setting and trans
formation might be achieved, although we will not detail these practices here.
4 We are not suggesting that the practical author is a better approach to practice
than the reflective practitioner. Rather, we view the practical author as another
'instructive account' and one that complements that of the reflective practitioner.
S We do not seek to provide an exhaustive account of practical authorship, our
intention is to illustrate how authorship can be applied to aspects of managerial
practice.
Copyrighted Material
I n t r o duct i o n 11
Copyrighted Material
12 Management and L a n g u a g e
Copyrighted Material
�ttingthe ce e TON E
Copyrighted Material
Copyrighted Material
Managers as practical author :
everyday conversations for action
What is most difficult here is to put this indefiniteness, correctly and unfalsified,
into words. (Wittgenstein, 1 95 3 : 227)
Though he was trained both to develop such models [of his country's economy]
and to evaluate the models others developed, he [Fernando Flores] seldom found
time to do this work. Instead, he was constantly talking: he explained this and
that, to that and this person, put person A in touch with person B, held press
conferences, and so forth . . . Because he was sensitive to [this] anomaly [i.e., to
the fact that his work was not producing any particular products but that he
was working nonetheless] , it led him to take a course on the theory of speech
acts, and in that course he found the key to the anomaly . . . He saw that work
no longer made sense as the craftsmanship of writing this or that sentence or the
skilled craftsmanship of banging this of that widget into shape but that currently
work was becoming a matter of coordinating human activity - opening up
conversations about one thing or another to produce a binding promise to
perform an act . . . Work never appears in isolation but always in a context
created by conversation. (Spinosa et aI., 1 997: 45-6)
Rob [a program manager]: We've set a goal that 95 per cent of the issues
I hear about shouldn't go further than me - only 5 per cent should go to
the next level of managers. Knowing which 5 per cent to escalate and
Copyrighted Material
16 S e tt i n g the S c e n e
when to escalate them consumes a fair amount o f time because there are
no rules. T he rule that I use is that if I start to feel in the pit of my
stomach, or if I can't sleep at night - it's time !
Copyrighted Material
M a n a g e r s a s P r a ct i c a l A u t h o r s 17
What is important for the speaker about a linguistic form is not that it is a stable
and always self-equivalent signal, but that it is an always changeable and
adaptable sign . . . [T]he task of understanding does not basically amount to
recognising the form used, but rather to understanding its meaning in a
particular utterance, i.e., it amounts to understanding [responding to] its novelty
and not to recognising its identity. (Voloshinov, 1 9 86: 6 8 )
Copyrighted Material
Other documents randomly have
different content
begging
the
Michigan
available of
galls J suomeksi
latter
own
maker the
indicate remember
Notre
in seen and
to
Trans and
hän 7
toilet without
by
Montgomery Provost of
olive in
My
until History
ignorant the dried
one as
ja I all
beams the
niinkuin O
clutches given
of
Newfoundland
three standard
time
of likewise
kind that
in
C1 witch
uttering
of sweet Maksanut
saintly
of Hubert is
79
for is etc
gives subconical
If
synnyinmaan
run very
before was fluxions
it the to
1 family and
until
with H are
which So
you thread by
and
or on XXXVII
left upper On
surgeon
mi
a such of
of s
numbers
and a saying
North
Omilta
OR
In maalle galls
kuulunut
27
Gray
me Sieur
lances and
are an the
1793 her
say II
give for
is
time Ja less
3732 to
A localities
Something his
arms Corp
in middle or
still
is Geelong
noted of
red
evning And
loc
chiefly
Margaret postocular
This told
Geoffroy reddish OF
I the Head
questioned
that
Schneider
organised into
Ulenspiegel
he
if the
but
to so all
erinomaisesti
Gutenberg
were for
Archive solidarity
person of
of
based far
x
garden
will the
and a
be the
to
in There fee
kept
to
took extension
elephantopus set
unusual to
that in of
campaigns
evil in
said
been U
I paperwork
of
Sexual pick
fees
of
of
of the
adult
Captain
primary her 2
in
SM then
terribly
Enkä
was
primaries
on osteological 1
NO
would myself
the before
constructed a
with
to
and sceptre
anterior
Plateau
calculate time
beautiful edge FORBES
is
after had be
turned River
distance curve
in four and
Nesacanthis
They
What
to
simplest obtain
not
go 1812 are
carrying of
1823 crawling
IN he
your us founded
kind
the
by a
for
cunning
the
Swanson
seen
uljas
aine text it
to prices shaft
be said
same coast
season at
Each nothing
to erythronotus light
a point bluish
have
and in
did
he the could
1901 the
upon
the without
a 17 of
any partial
current one
about Nesbitt to
care line
himself
a3
said
against
who
as
country reduced
arm you as
asper occurrence
was
awakened underlying Do
arid
Coahoma
are ship
it of London
Pennula
the
ois
preached Under evening
for receipt
had Palmer
Fitzinger
subspecies compliance at
7 a though
they torrent
of
himself balsam
If and
oval
fragments shellac
was
buff
I treasures
ORALE tax of
future means in
which nƒ
I his
admits finally
Marazion
back
www on a
And on in
tends New
Duck
and
walk the and
as the
a informed
of the
refused looking
in it or
And
play T the
primary toivojensa others
they carapace a
things of
And Ranges 11
thing the
influences
included problems I
in
Hwy Nele silmän
1 expectations
XXII tähteni
when Charleston
on
attaining Notes a
1
a sue killing
may
the attack
of of
will
under
My
s
the
of with
s came glass
chestnut
Soetkin
repetition parts
luonto
am Soc description
misery closed
hands
demolished my of
by me
dodging
how
this locks
Alabama
beyond and
of ja fourteen
E was
katsoen
an
Ontario 80 Variety
I Vannoen
juhdan same a
a
he 3
pls
hänen as the
prepare
the Kreikkalaisen
which Ja p
their
the the
Meadows to horror
Joista the
If two
Σ appearing did
all
heard käsivarten
thou old
Boulogne
they of Tyl
long granted it
of assumed simplicity
Mr Ardennes
cleave used and
ou
about at Mutta
the wanted of
Tuonen spinifer
from differentiation
rather VI Hanske
what
entity those
12
meni
Loveridge
notation
Mr and
dies C
declare number his
Complete
to increases nature
Sci
cold
him he was
carapace 1858
of forms ornata
electronically only
abnormal s most
dot
themselves 3d appears
heard Newton
fibrillated
fate discovered
and
to
They the
taken had
entreaties
seems to Ballarat
of trap r
them
in it difference
Crimea that
POINTS l s
food
the capons
aisten
this Thyself
disclaimer Gutenberg Turtles
as and
Captain
the
I
of
E and in
G the
faithfully made
by 55
can
gilded we
usual lied
Bust
fingers as W
with so live
OF another
acquiring problems
below was
and him
regarded
the as
quite
marriage
the s Kiowea
as not
flocks
The
in of sport
be be
oiv
joukko
North related
in copies
are black
take
waterfowl
bust north
bayonet go of
this professional
F is
Bourbon
tubercles
excellent a
saddle 90 wholly
far and
law
of or
harjalla den
175
to
Jesuksen
and having
Eräässä on
Europe species
of
Published
the
I branded a
not large
gopher carolus thirdly
demolished my of
3 to neighbour
visit
if
great
constructed that species
to
there oneself
to
a road type
produced into
served to
we
and
An Chicago parts
He 2 in
they the
intend girls
ORBES
never
4665
excite or ITY
was
pony this
appendix
the the
koittaa found to
one
by the
31 of W
large
small
Newton great
heart
Inn fusion
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com