Mathematical Modelling in Real Life Problems Case Studies From ECMI Modelling Weeks Ewald Lindner PDF Download
Mathematical Modelling in Real Life Problems Case Studies From ECMI Modelling Weeks Ewald Lindner PDF Download
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
Mathematical Modelling in Real Life Problems Case Studies
from ECMI Modelling Weeks Ewald Lindner pdf download
Available Formats
Ewald Lindner
Alessandra Micheletti
Cláudia Nunes Editors
Mathematical
Modelling
in Real Life
Problems
Case Studies from ECMI-Modelling
Weeks
Mathematics in Industry
Volume 33
Managing Editor
Michael Günther, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
Series Editors
Luis L. Bonilla, University Carlos III Madrid, Escuela, Leganes, Spain
Otmar Scherzer, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Wil Schilders, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
The ECMI subseries of the Mathematics in Industry series is a project of The
European Consortium for Mathematics in Industry. Mathematics in Industry
focuses on the research and educational aspects of mathematics used in industry and
other business enterprises. Books for Mathematics in Industry are in the following
categories: research monographs, problem-oriented multi-author collections,
textbooks with a problem-oriented approach, conference proceedings. Relevance to
the actual practical use of mathematics in industry is the distinguishing feature of
the books in the Mathematics in Industry series.
Mathematical Modelling
in Real Life Problems
Case Studies from ECMI-Modelling Weeks
Editors
Ewald Lindner Alessandra Micheletti
Institute of Computational Mathematics Department of Environmental Sciences and
Johannes Kepler University of Linz Policy and Data Science Research Center
Linz, Austria Milano
Università degli Studi di Milano
Milano, Italy
Cláudia Nunes
Center for Computational and Stochastic
Mathematics
Instituto Superior Técnico (IST),
Universidade de Lisboa
Lisboa, Portugal
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Preface
In recent years, numerous reports and studies have demonstrated that Mathemat-
ics is an essential tool to improve industrial innovation, and mixed academic–
industrial consortia and networks, like ECMI (European Consortium for Mathe-
matics in Industry—http://ecmi-indmath.org) and MI-Net (Mathematics in Industry
Network—https://mi-network.org/) are working to foster the recognition of Mathe-
matics as an enabling technology.
In this framework, an increasing need of mathematicians trained to work in
an industrial environment has been observed and has pushed the academic world
to provide novel training formats, able to respond to industrial needs. ECMI
in particular has established an educational programme, offered by the ECMI
Educational Centres, which is aimed to provide such training. Its main ingredients
are mathematical modelling activities, in particular the International Modelling
Weeks and the modelling seminars.
The International Modelling Weeks format is an international workshop where
master students and/or early-career investigators (PhD students and postdocs)
receive hands-on training in problem-solving, teamwork, and in learning to exploit
their different skills to model efficiently non-mathematical problems. During
modelling Weeks are training workshops where students from different countries
spend a week working in small multinational groups on projects which are based on
real-life problems. Each group is led by an instructor who introduces the problem,
usually formulated in non-mathematical terms, on the first day and then helps
to guide the students to a solution during the week. The students present their
results to the other groups on the last day and then write up their work as a report.
This format allows to train students in mathematical modelling and stimulate
their collaboration and communication skills, in a multinational environment. The
instructors “emulate” the figures of real industrial delegates, thus pushing the
students to start working in a non-academic environment.
Modelling seminars are also offered locally by the ECMI Educational Centres.
They have a structure similar to the modelling weeks, but are usually spread over one
semester, and are attended only by the students enrolled in the offering university.
v
vi Preface
vii
viii Contents
1.1 Introduction
Aim of this material is to provide a guideline to the modeling and fast numerical
solution of the inverse problem arising in the context of Diffuse Optical Tomography
(DOT), an innovative imaging technique which finds application in several clinical
settings. DOT applications extend to a wide ensemble of diagnostic/monitoring
purposes, ranging from cancer screening—object of this work, and in particular
for breast cancer screening—to monitoring of brain function in newborns or stroke
patients, to seizure detection in real time (see [11] for a comprehensive review).
Background In the seventeenth century, the French painter Georges de La Tour
(1593–1652) portrayed in his work St. Joseph the carpenter the light of a candle
transmitted through the thin fingers of the child Jesus (see Fig. 1.1). The painter’s
observation represents a common experience, which can be easily reproduced also
with present means: if a flashlight is shone onto one’s hand, it is clearly apparent that
light can travel through tissue and be detected on the other side with respect to the
source. This fact motivates the use of light to image the inside of the body, with the
benefit of a non-invasive and non ionizing technique. Moreover, in a broader sense,
physicians have always tried to diagnose health conditions from the appearance
of a patient. However, the first attempts to use light as a quantitative diagnostic
tool were impractical. The depth of penetration of light at visible frequencies is
too low to allow for investigations in tissues/organs thicker than a few millimeters.
In the context of breast screening, optical characterization was attempted in 1929
P. Causin ()
Department of Mathematics, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
e-mail: [email protected]
R.-M. Weishaeupl
Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
Fig. 1.1 In the painting St. Joseph the carpenter (1640), the French artist Georges de La Tour
represented the effect of candlelight crossing the thin fingers of the child Jesus (source: Wikipedia)
Fig. 1.2 Light crossing a biological tissue undergoes elastic scattering and, in a smaller portion,
absorption. The trajectories of emerging photons are for the greatest part diffusive and not ballistic.
This causes an inherent difficulty in reconstructing the optical coefficients that lead to such photon
paths
emerged to improve the quality of the results and the patient comfort during the
examination. Optical breast imaging emerged as a novel imaging technique that uses
near-infrared light (NIR, 600–900 nm) to assess optical properties of tissues. NIR
wavelengths represent the so–called optical window, where absorption is minimal
and thus deeper penetration in the tissue is obtained. At the same time, since
the existing absorption is mainly affected by the tissue hemoglobin content and
only secondarily by other components, this information can be used for diagnostic
purposes. Higher absorption for carcinomas than for the surrounding tissue is
indeed to be expected due to increased blood content associated with tumor-related
angiogenesis [17]. However, imaging of tissue structure and function is greatly
blurred by the simultaneous presence of elastic scattering, which can be 100x
larger than absorption and is caused by small differences in refractive index at
the microscopic level, mainly due to fat droplets and structures inside the cell
nucleus [15]. Scattering makes impossible to reconstruct the deterministic path of
a single photon from its emission to the exiting point (see Fig. 1.2). Several years
were required to gain the necessary knowledge and technology to overcome this
difficulty. Significant improvements were obtained with the use of tomographic
methods, crucial for recovery of spatial information about optical properties. The
combination of these technologies gave rise to the DOT approach. In DOT several
challenging topics emerge: in this project we will focus on the mathematical aspects
arising from the reconstruction of the optical coefficients, which represent the core
of the DOT problem. To start with, we report here below the clear explanation of
the DOT principle provided in the review paper by Boas et al. [2].
DOT Principle “The basic idea of DOT imaging is to illuminate the tissue with an
array of light sources and to measure the light leaving the tissue with an array of
detectors. For each source location, one records an image of the light reaching each
detector from that particular source. A model of the propagation of light in tissue is
developed and parametrized in terms of the unknown absorption and scattering as a
function of position in the tissue. Then, using the model together with the ensemble
of images over all the sources, one attempts to “invert” the propagation model
to recover the parameters of interest, or, in other words, to estimate the optical
parameters out of the data, using the model.”
The present work is organized as follows: in Sect. 1.2 we introduce the math-
ematical model to compute light propagation in the medium with prescribed
optical coefficients and we briefly discuss its derivation and properties; in Sect. 1.3
we introduce the inverse problem and its treatment with the Rytov perturbation
approach, detailing its derivation and we discuss the important issue of problem
regularization; in Sect. 1.5 we propose a scheme to implement the DOT algorithm
in a computer code; in Sect. 1.6 we propose two numerical test cases to validate
the algorithm and, eventually, in Sect. 1.7 we draw the conclusions and we propose
some topics for further work.
4 P. Causin and R.-M. Weishaeupl
I = I0 e−μa r , (1.1)
1 ∂U (r, t)
− ∇ · (D(r)∇U (r, t)) + μa (r)U (r, t) = S(r, t), (1.2)
c ∂t
1
D(r) = ,
3(μa (r) + μs (r))
where μs (r) = μs (r)(1 − g)[cm]−1 is the reduced scattering coefficient, μs being
the scattering coefficient and g an anisotropy scattering factor. Observe that, from
the microscopic viewpoint, the DE modeling approach supposes that the photons
move throughout the sample along random paths. Each photon travels along straight
segments with a sudden discontinuity when the photon changes direction or is
absorbed. The average length of rectilinear tracts is the mean free path, t r 1/μs .
Equation (1.4) is endowed with the following Fresnel air–sample interface law
AU (ξ ) + ∇U (ξ ) · n = 0, ∀ξ ∈ ∂Ω, (1.3)
where n is the unit normal vector with respect to the boundary ∂Ω of Ω at point ξ .
The accomodation coefficient A takes into account the differences in the refractive
indices of the scattering medium and the surrounding medium and is defined as (see
e.g. [8])
1 + Reff
A= , Reff = −1.440n−2 + 0.71n−1 + 0.668 + 0.0636n,
1 − Reff
n = nin /nout being the ratio of the index of refraction inside (tissue) and outside
(air).
For the purposes of the following discussion, the stationary case (∂U/∂t = 0) of
the DE is considered. This hypothesis implies that the light distribution within the
object is instantaneous: this is justified when μa μs , as in the application at hand.
This latter observation also justifies the further assumption D(r) 1/(3μs (r)),
which in the present context is reduced to D = const since we will consider a
homogeneous scattering coefficient throughout the domain. Then, Eq. (1.4) reduces
6 P. Causin and R.-M. Weishaeupl
For a given μa distribution, problem (1.4) shall be solved in this project in two
different contexts:
(P1) to model fluence in the points of the domain where required in the solution of
the inverse problem (see next section). A fundamental solution method with
Green’s functions will be used in this context. This approach is chosen in order
to dispose of cheap evaluations of the solution without the need of meshing the
patient–specific volumetric geometry and is adequate to provide, despite the
approximation, “almost real time” diagnostic results
(P2) to generate in silico substitutes of experimental data. A finite element method
will be used to discretize (1.4) and fluence will be sampled in chosen locations
on the boundary of the domain, simulating fluence measurements at locations
of the light detectors.
The inverse problem constitutes the procedure in which optical coefficients are
sought given a set of measurements of the fluence on the body surface. The most
general approach should consist in an iterative method where at each step the
unknown parameters are updated while trying to minimize an error functional
depending on the difference between the measured values and the computed values.
However, in practice, this procedure turns out to be exceedingly expensive for the
application at hand. It is thus convenient to adopt a linearized approach as described
below.
Rytov Approximation (Perturbation Approach)
Due to the nature of the present work, we deem useful to report in detail the
derivation of the perturbation approach we adopt, known as Rytov approximation.
Such derivation is inspired by Ishimaru [12, Vol. II, Ch. 17], with a modification
to include the presence of a volumetric light source. Starting from Eq. (1.4), we
suppose that the absorption coefficient μa may be written as μa = μa,0 + δμa ,
where μa,0 is a background value and δμa a (small) perturbation term. We now let
δμa S
− [Δψ1 + 2∇ψ1 · ∇ψ0 ] = − + ∇ψ1 · ∇ψ1 + (e−ψ − e−ψ0 ). (1.10)
D D
Observing that
1 1
− [Δψ1 + 2∇ψ1 · ∇ψ0 ] = − [Δ(U0 ψ1 ) − ψ1 ΔU0 ] =
U0 U0
1 μa ψ1 S
− [Δ − ](U0 ψ1 ) − , (1.12)
U0 D U0 D
where we have also used the fact that U0 solves problem (1.6). We eventually obtain
the following equation for (U0 ψ1 )
μa δμa
[Δ − ](U0 ψ1 ) = − ∇ψ1 · ∇ψ1 U0 , (1.13)
D D
8 P. Causin and R.-M. Weishaeupl
where we have used the approximation (valid for small ψ1 and recalling that U0 =
eψ0 )
S S −ψ S S
ψ1 + U0 e − e−ψ0 = ψ1 + (U0 /eψ0 ) e−ψ1 − 1 ≈
D D D D
S S
ψ1 + (1 − ψ1 − 1) = 0.
D D
Equation (1.13) is of modified Helmholtz type and its solution can be expressed as
the convolution integral
δμa
U0 ψ1 = G(r − r ) − ∇ψ1 · ∇ψ1 U0 dr , (1.14)
Ω D
where G(r − r ) is the Green’s function for the operator [Δ − μDa ] (see Appendix
for details). Neglecting the second order term in ∇ψ1 and dividing by U0 , we obtain
the following expression for ψ1,0 ∼ ψ1
1 δμa (r )
ψ1,0 (r) = G(r − r ) U0 (r ) dr , (1.15)
U0 (r) Ω D
where we have made explicit all the dependencies on the integration and position
variables. Gathering Eq. (1.15) and the definition of ψ1 , we eventually obtain
1 δμa (r ) U (r)
G(r − r ) U0 (r ) dr = log . (1.16)
U0 (r) Ω D U0 (r)
Important Relation (1.16) is the core of the inverse problem: the left-hand side is
built according to the DE model of light propagation (this corresponds to its use as
detailed in P1), while the right-hand side is measured experimentally recording the
transmitted light in the perturbed and homogeneous field, respectively. The inverse
problem consists in finding the perturbation field δμa = δμa (r) such that Eq. (1.16)
holds (in a mathematical sense that we will specify later on).
To solve the inverse problem, we start from Eq. (1.16) and we recall that in
the tomographic configuration light is successively generated by different sources
and collected by the detectors (which lay on the boundary of the domain). We
suppose thus to dispose of M experimental measurements, that is, M source–
detector couples with M = Ns × Nd , Ns being the number of light sources and
Nd the number of detectors. We choose successively in (1.16) r as the detector
positions rdl , l = 1, . . . , Nd and we consider in turn each light source of position
1 Inverse Problems in Diffuse Optical Tomography Applications 9
N
ΔVj δμa (rj ) U (rs , rd )
G(rd − rj ) U0 (rs , rj ) log (1.17)
U0 (rs , rd ) D U0 (rs , rd )
j =1
where we have made explicit all the dependencies. Relation (1.17) is conveniently
written in matrix form by introducing the sensitivity matrix J ∈ R(M×N)
ΔVj 1
J = Jij = G(rdl − rj ) U0 (rsk , rj ) , (1.18)
U0 (rsk , rdl ) D
U (rsk , rdl )
y = yi = log , (1.19)
U0 (rsk , rdl )
where the index i stands for the detector/source pair, i.e. i = 1, . . . , M → {l, k},
l = 1, . . . , Nd , k = 1, . . . , Ns and the index j for the voxel number, j = 1, . . . , N.
Letting (with a slight abuse of notation) δμa ∈ R(N×1) be the vector of unknown
variations in absorption coefficient, we then obtain
J δμa = y. (1.20)
which represents the discrepancy between modeled data and measured data. We can
formally derive the minimizer for the functional L (δμa ) by performing the Fréchet
10 P. Causin and R.-M. Weishaeupl
d d
L (δμa + εv) = y − J (δμa + εv) 2
2 = 0, (1.22)
dε ε=0 dε ε=0
[J T J ]δμa = J T y. (1.23)
Again one can derive the equation for the minimizer of the regularized functional
L R (δμa ) and obtain the regularized system:
(J T J + λI )δμR
a = J y.
T
(1.25)
The regularization parameter λ controls the weight given to minimization of the side
constraint relative to minimization of the residual norm. Its choice is not trivial and
several approaches exist (see [10] for more details).
Choice of λ and numerical solution of the regularized system To start with, we
suggest to simply set λ to a constant. We have found that in several test cases
λ = 10−3 is a reasonable value. However, you may want to play around a bit and see
1 Inverse Problems in Diffuse Optical Tomography Applications 11
the effect of choosing different values. Then, you can solve system (1.25) by a linear
solver of your choice. Notice that more sophisticated regularization approaches
exist, of which we provide some details in Sect. 1.7.
Many programming languages can be used to implement a computer code for the
solution of the DOT problem and to construct in silico substitutes of the measured
data (these latter are strongly suggested over “real” experimental data to start with!).
We propose here to use Matlab®, in order to take advantage of its several built-
in algorithms and functions in addition to its efficient linear systems solver. The
following steps must be carried out (you may want to refer to Fig. 1.3 for an example
in 2D):
(I) first, you need to implement the solution of the forward problem (as detailed
in point P2 of Sect. 1.2) to generate the in silico data for photon fluence. It is
convenient (but not compulsory!) to use the Matlab® PDE Solver. To do this,
you must perform the following steps:
I.1 define and mesh the domain geometry
I.2 define the position of sources and detectors
I.3 define the background optical coefficients. You can use literature values as
suggested in Sect. 1.6
I.4 when computing the perturbed solution, define the position and shape of
inclusions (see Sect. 1.6 for details); define their optical coefficients
I.5 define sources as Gaussian bells centered around the application point.
The intensity of the source is not relevant since you will perform a
normalization (see Eq. (1.19)). You can play a bit with the variance of
the Gaussian (something of the order of 0.01 usually works fine)
I.6 enforce boundary conditions (see Eq. (1.3) and, more specifically,
Eq. (1.26))
I.7 solve the problem with finite elements. Matrix assembly and system
solution is automatically performed by the Matlab® PDE solver
I.8 collect the values of the solution (fluence) at the detector locations.
You must execute the above procedure twice: once with an homogeneous
background value for the absorption coefficient (corresponding to μa,0 ), and
once with the presence of inclusions (corresponding to perturbation δμa in
some regions of the domain). Save the respective data on two separate files,
along with the locations of sources and detectors and background optical
coefficients
(II) you now have to implement the solution of the inverse problem by performing
the following steps (in this phase you must pretend you do not know the
12 P. Causin and R.-M. Weishaeupl
location and absorption strength of the inclusions and you must reconstruct
them!):
II.1 read the files you saved in the previous point
II.2 build the voxelization of the domain (see Fig. 1.3(right) for an example);
compute the voxel centroids and volumes
II.3 build the sensitivity matrix (a delicate point for code efficiency!). To do
this:
i. write a function which, given source position and evaluation point,
returns the value of the corresponding Green’s function for the modi-
fied Helmholtz problem (free-space and dipole versions, respectively,
refer to the Appendix)
ii. build the sensitivity matrix using Eq. (1.18). Pay attention: it is
convenient to compute the value U0 at the numerator with dipole
Green’s function expansion and use instead data generated at point (I)
for the value U0 at the denominator. In addition, use for the Green’s
function appearing at the numerator the free-space version
II.4 build the right-hand side y by normalizing corresponding perturbed data
over background data read from the files
II.5 solve the resulting overdetermined system for the variation of the absorp-
tion coefficient by Tikhonov regularization (see Sect. 1.3). To solve the
regularized system you can simply use the \ command of Matlab®
(III) visualize the results representing the solution value in each voxel and super-
pose to the plot the exact position of the inclusions. This procedure is known
as “mapping” of the results. To perform it, you can use the Matlab® command
patch. Use a colorbar to check the magnitude of the values!
Fig. 1.3 (a) Common geometry and source/detector positioning for the numerical experiments;
(b) discretization of the domain in voxels
1 Inverse Problems in Diffuse Optical Tomography Applications 13
U =0 on ∂ΓD ,
∂U (1.26)
U + 2AD =0 on ΓR ,
∂n
where ∂Ω = ΓD ∪ ΓR , n is the outward normal vector. Notice that the first
condition represents the fact light does not escape from the solid plate. In all the
numerical tests, we adopted the following physically reasonable background values
(see e.g. [14]): μs = 0.1 [cm−1 ], μa,0 = 0.01 [cm−1 ]. Moreover, we used N = 588
voxels, which correspond to a spatial resolution of 0.25 cm (see Fig. 1.3b for an
example of voxelization).
Perform the Following Studies
– Test case 1
Consider a single circular inclusion placed at x = 2, y = 2 cm with radius
0.3 cm. Set the absorption coefficient of the inclusion to μa,inc = 2 × μa,0 (see
Fig. 1.4a).
– Test case 2
Place two circular inclusions at x = −2.5, y = 2.5 cm and x = 2, y = 1 cm,
respectively, both with radius 0.3 cm. Set the absorption coefficient of the leftmost
inclusion to μa,inc = 5 × μa,0 , while for the rightmost to μa,inc = 2 × μa,0 (see
Fig. 1.5a).
The results we obtained for test case 1 are shown in Fig. 1.4b, while the results for
test case 2 are shown in Fig. 1.5b. Observe that we correctly estimate the differential
absorption coefficient of the inclusion(s) and we localize their positions, but the
Fig. 1.4 Test case 1: (a) setting; (b) reconstructed absorption coefficient
14 P. Causin and R.-M. Weishaeupl
Fig. 1.5 Test case 2: (a) setting; (b) reconstructed absorption coefficient
affected region is largely over–estimated. This effect is in large part due to the use
of the 2 -norm regularization (see the next section for further comments). Moreover,
in the case with two inclusions, the value of the weaker one is not computed with
high precision.
This work was aimed at offering a “gentle introduction” to some of the mathematical
and numerical issues related to DOT technology. This is a very promising field,
capable of offering a fast, cost–effective and unharmful screening tool. However,
DOT resolution is a mathematically challenging problem. Here, we have provided
a self-contained material to carry out a complete DOT solution in a simplified
setting. The results obtained with the techniques that we presented allow to obtain
an estimation of the position and strength of the inclusion, but much space is left to
improvements. For example, as you can observe from the rightmost plots in Figs. 1.4
and 1.5 that the position of the estimated variation in the absorption coefficient is
not exactly coincident with the true one, as well as its spatial extension. This latter
results to be somewhat blurred, a typical effect of the Tikhonov regularization. To
obtain better and sharper results, more sophisticated tools are required. We suggest
to consult the different literature contributions in this field, for example see [3–
5, 8, 9, 13]. In addition, we list below a series of points that represent issues that
deserve further attention in a deeper analysis of the problem.
Further Work You may want to investigate the following points (some of them not
trivial at all!):
• do the results change using a finer voxelization? Is there a good compromise? Try
to use, instead of a voxelization as suggested here, a Delaunay triangular mesh.
How do the results change?
• what is the role of the regularization parameter? Can we find an automatic
way to establish a good value for it? To start with, you can explore the
possibilities offered in the regtool suite which is a freely available package
for regularization in Matlab®
• try to add some noise to the data (for example 1–5% of the local value, with an
independent Gaussian distribution at each detector). What is the effect?
1 Inverse Problems in Diffuse Optical Tomography Applications 15
The DE model and its successive manipulations in the Rytov procedure yield
relation that represent instances of the inhomogeneous modified Helmholtz equation
of the form:
L G(r − r ) = δ(r − r )
where δ is the Dirac delta centered in r . It holds the following (see e.g., [7])
Lemma 1.1 Given the partial differential equation L φ(r) = f (r), r ∈ Ω, if
G(r − r ) is the Green’s function with respect to the linear partial differential
operator L , then a solution to the PDE is given by the convolution between the
source term f and the Green’s function
φ(r) = G(r − r )f (r ) dr (1.28)
Ω
The Green’s function for our operator at hand L = (Δ − α 2 ) has the following
expression for n = 2 or 3 (see e.g. [7])
⎧
⎪ 1
⎪
⎨ − K0 (α||r − r ||) n = 2,
2π
G(r − r ) = (1.29)
⎪
⎪ 1 e−α||r−r ||
⎩− n = 3,
4π ||r − r ||
where K0 is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order zero (in
Matlab® you can compute it with the command besselk). Observe that the
Green’s functions in (1.29) refer to an infinite domain and only satisfy the radiation
condition |G| → 0 for |r| → ∞. As a result, the corresponding solution obtained
from the convolution procedure does not satisfy the proper boundary conditions on
the finite domain Ω. In order to partially correct this fact, you can use the so–called
dipole approximation which allows to enforce null solution over a plane, which is a
convenient condition in our case for the part of the breast laying on the solid plate.
To fix ideas, let us think this plane to correspond to z = 0. When a point source is
placed at a small depth into the sample, an equivalent opposite “sink” is placed at
16 P. Causin and R.-M. Weishaeupl
−. The following dipole solution is obtained for a source located in x = (0, 0, )
References
1. Arridge, S.R., Hebden, J.C.: Optical imaging in medicine: II. modelling and reconstruction.
Phys. Med. Biol. 42(5), 841 (1997)
2. Boas, D.A., Brooks, D.H., Miller, E.L., DiMarzio, C.A., Kilmer, M., Gaudette, R.J., Zhang,
Q.: Imaging the body with diffuse optical tomography. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag. 18(6), 57–75
(2001)
3. Cao, N., Nehorai, A., Jacob, M.: Image reconstruction for diffuse optical tomography using
sparsity regularization and expectation-maximization algorithm. Opt. express 15(21), 13695–
13708 (2007)
4. Causin, P., Naldi, G., Weishaeupl, R.M.: Elastic net regularization in Diffuse Optical Tomog-
raphy applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical
Imaging, ISBI 2019, Venice (to appear, 2019)
5. Choe, R.: Diffuse optical tomography and spectroscopy of breast cancer and fetal brain. Ph.D.
thesis, University of Pennsylvania (2005)
6. Cutler, M.: Transillumination of the breast. Ann. Surg. 93(1), 223 (1931)
7. Duffy, D.G.: Green’s Functions with Applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2018)
8. Durduran, T., Choe, R., Baker, W., Yodh, A.G.: Diffuse optics for tissue monitoring and
tomography. Rep. Prog. Phys. 73(7), 076701 (2010)
9. Gibson, A., Hebden, J., Arridge, S.R.: Recent advances in diffuse optical imaging. Phys. Med.
Biol. 50(4), R1 (2005)
10. Hansen, P.C.: Regularization tools, a matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-
posed problems (2008). Http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~pcha/Regutools/
11. Hoshi, Y., Yamada, Y.: Overview of diffuse optical tomography and its clinical applications. J.
Biomed. Opt. 21(9), 091312 (2016)
12. Ishimaru, A.: Wave propagation and scattering in random media, vol. 2. Academic press New
York (1978)
13. Konovalov, A.B., Genina, E.A., Bashkatov, A.N.: Diffuse optical mammotomography: state-
of-the-art and prospects. ”J. Biomed. Photonics Eng. 2(2) (2016)
14. Sun, Z., Wang, Y., Jia, K., Feng, J.: Comprehensive study of methods for automatic choice of
regularization parameter for diffuse optical tomography. Optical Eng. 56(4), 041310 (2016)
15. Swartling, J., Andersson-Engels, S.: Optical mammography–a new method for breast cancer
detection using ultra-short laser pulses. DOPS-NYT p. 19 (2001)
16. Swinehart, D.: The Beer-Lambert law. J. Chem. Educ. 39(7), 333 (1962)
17. Taroni, P.: Diffuse optical imaging and spectroscopy of the breast: a brief outline of history and
perspectives. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 11(2), 241–250 (2012)
Chapter 2
1D Models for Blood Flow in Arteries
2.1 Introduction
A. B. de Moura ()
REM—Research in Economics and Mathematics; CEMAPRE—Center for Applied Mathematics
and Economics, ISEG—Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Universidade de Lisboa,
Lisbon, Portugal
e-mail: [email protected]
The 1D model dates back to Euler [10], that already in 1775 introduced a 1D
model of the human arterial system, yet claiming “the incredible difficulties for
its solution”. Here the 1D model for blood flow in arteries is derived from the
3D model. We start by considering the Navier-Stokes equations for Newtonian
incompressible fluids [11]:
⎧
⎨ ∂u + u · ∇u + 1 ∇P − νΔu = f,
∂t ρ in Ω (2.1)
⎩
div u = 0,
where the unknowns are the fluid velocity u = (ux , uy , uz ) and pressure P ,
depending on space x = (x, y, z) and time t, with Ω the 3D vascular district of
interest (see Fig. 2.1). Here f is a given function representing the volume forces
exerted on the fluid, as e.g. the gravity, ρ is the constant blood density, and ν is the
constant blood viscosity. We will neglect body forces, f = 0.
The first equation of (2.1) describes the momentum conservation, while the
second is the continuity equation and represents the conservation of mass.
The Navier-Stokes equations (2.1) are coupled with a model for the vessel wall
displacement. Due to their complex structure, it is very difficult to devise appropriate
and accurate models describing the mechanical behaviour of the artery walls. We
will not go into detail on this subject, but we will consider that the walls of the
vessel can move as the result of the fluid pressure. Equations (2.1), together with a
2 1D Models for Blood Flow in Arteries 19
2
ω
ω
1 3
Ω
ω
ω
4
model for the vessel wall, constitute a 3D FSI (fluid-structure interaction) model for
blood flow in vascular districts.
and
r
uz (t, r, θ, z) = uz (t, r, z) = ū(t, z) × s (2.2)
R(t, z)
where s(·) is the velocity profile, assumed constant in time, t, and space,
z, which is in fact in contrast with the observations and 3D models. In this
simplifying setting, s(·) may be though of as a profile representative of an
average flow configuration. In practice, it will be considered flat or parabolic.
The unknown variables of the 1D model will be averaged quantities. The area is
related with wall displacement and is given by A(t, z) = S(t,z) ds = πR 2 (t, z);
the flow rate, Q(t, z) = S(t,z) uz ds = A(t, z)ū(t, z), and mean velocity, ū(t, z) =
Q(t,z)
A(t,z) S(t,z) uz ds = A(t,z) , are related with fluid velocity. Due to H4, the mean
1
pressure is p̄(t, z) = S(t,z) P (t, z)ds = P (t, z)A(t, z). All these quantities depend
on t and z. In the notation, we will usually omit, unless needed, this dependence.
From H6, H1, and (2.2) we have
2π R R
1 r ū(t, z) r
ū(t, z) = ū(t, z)s rdrdθ = 2π s rdr
πR 2 0 0 R πR 2 0 R
2 R 1
meaning that R2 = 0 s Rr rdr, and 0 s(y)ydy = 0.5 by doing the change
of variable r = Ry. We also define the momentum-flux coefficient or Coriolis
coefficient, related with the fluid velocity profile:
u2z ds ū2 s 2 ds s 2 ds
α= S
= S
= S
Aū2 Aū2 A
It is easy to see that α 1. In general α varies with time, t, and space, z. Here it
is considered to be constant as a consequence of H6, since α is related with ur . For
steady flow in circular rigid tubes the Navier-Stokes equations have the very well
known Poiseuille solution, consisting of a parabolic velocity profile. For a Poiseuille
profile we have s(y) = 2(1 − y 2 ) and α = 4/3. For blood flow it has been found
that the velocity profile is rather flat [11], corresponding to s(y) = 1 and α = 1.
From assumptions H4, H5 and H6, the Navier-Stokes equations (2.1) become:
⎧
⎨ ∂uz + div(u u) + 1 ∂P − νΔu = 0,
z z
∂t ρ ∂z in Ω (2.3)
⎩
div u = 0,
meaning that the wall moves at the same velocity as the fluid.
We will integrate equations (2.3) on the generic cross section S(z) term by term.
Consider the portion V of the vascular tube Ω around point z, comprising the axial
intervention
the
English of guilty
the
career
the of
the single by
lakes of
very Harte
introspective of
the
satisfaction strolen David
necessities himself
and c article
commercial there to
the the
metallic state
the
been to
connected
more
people in Secret
pp candour posthumous
and This
Born the
has than it
Government The I
put various
happens
established up
have Paris
that
present
examined of
the
be and
in end
course
creation
private
fiction the
the industry A
or dine
lit
a Deluge
on
responsibility
of
of like permit
used
by pigeons of
not
there time
and young
expression
sitting clothes
with he
and forward follow
candid
now self by
motion peculiar
subsequently
Scotland boarded
multitude low
in
corresponds July in
of Holy
from rode
X own
Review of of
their number
in
apply not to
into This
word inventions
an he
of tankcars
of
the co
superficial
burden testimoniis form
local to
the
war Bishop
Minister of
say
Stow
or but is
along
oblatum
idea but its
Plato energy
Such
in Hosmini could
attempt
commemorated light
ejusve to
instance modern of
group
French
rain rule
desired through
the a
cave Mr
meaning
accommodation
He had
was
golem that
form to
are
to
by What
the condition
Mas system
adds blue
junks its
most before
iVo rate
the
or
given
with and
as stimulate
really
Or And him
himself simple
them day
consequent
188G is
Divine a to
the
a white
Plato withhold
must and
is a
The more
out of remarkable
region s
Art In its
the
England off
and The
of Bevue a
the first
reparation and
very B
of hospitality
in
Introduction
being
liked itself
his
the remains among
and well
and
feeling that
with
to
about semi
massive still
but bearing
tactics
omnibus long it
in
November
corruption Of mere
in the
spokesman
the
The repeated it
be
in Vol www
is
right
thoughts
the may
in start Jan
of a iusta
in the without
military the
their be
meditations span to
of Mahometan
the
novelist
Danaans oonstituit It
to the
of
have
onward a
our he
God my have
the
way control
by curiosity recommend
of to
glad Moran
of classmate of
individual that
wished
firmissimoque by were
1840
master
the
The
prohibition
them vast
this forms
certainly
an a
have
close a word
the
fiercely of fellowship
and wishes to
rich with
door to
is at Co
technology of cessation
under
Englishman two
to
religious of
only
within ayas
Lee important little
dashing
up
free the
a reduced their
and as violent
ancient Notices
style though of
Entrance to
is some
in I hidden
have supplications
up would
rapid and a
of up Plain
our a never
means of the
Crimea secret the
nature
The act
Jdhrhuch
1 to
tabernacle witness of
circumstances of the
being
whole universum
is were
of
takes
he effect would
fundata
visit it
mention
a country
they
it put
different the I
for scene
licences it to
the
rebellion non
as shows
specialiter is pulsing
word of H
ad harder
reliable in are
and St
lowest
fur of
be as
the howl
things yourselves
show was
its soul
the true
an The
MR at revolutionary
there apparent
doesn
his
are
winding proposes
evident Four
industry
visit and
volumes civilization be
the Catholic is
is travel terrified
Fidelissimo number
makes
single
arrives facere
totally him make
these
land
p rights Boohs
a
man
fascinating 24 existence
Mr opportune
his He accord
briefly
with walls
fleets
Hazeland and
their to former
Anabaptists
by and Gilbertian
of autographs the
executing
Mua or
the don
deal
interested a
the
method lines
as emulation purposeless
employs worded
only
agree his
of
complete of
Position
R is
own just in
is
184 s
break
starting
as and affinities
at of very
children
what
or
the
unbridled
The Egypt
condemn his and
conscience number
or
in
Pere
com about
et their
of day
strong
out for
of the
Russian amoris be
chief
July and
are little of
a fact inside
of
of
addressed
all
for
officers
so high dam
critic teach du
positions in
the
to
Terraces used by
there skull
history
was one awhile
was
Ezechiel
civil Klostergrab
the the
contained
appeared to
Cross the
than is London
by
Taburnia
cult stolen
of description
is York
NPC remains
the any
indefinite creatures
which himself is
the Independent a
saintly to all
His
the the tury
place inhabitauts It
insisted before
to
would However
So are foundation
but
need
fellows
comparing and
And draft
the theory
from
in
Tao as is
those them by
having
in faithful important
correct
observed
the have
lest
Some which
74 is associated
other
Mer power
of topic A
however floor
would lucid
alorensem to are
Greater effects
distinction
Constitution Benziger
carefully his
86 matter
effect
Kensington
the within Address
Rule no
is contentment shaken
supposition
real This harping
he concerned taking
a for tze
ingenuity
as whirling F
as Science
track
and
all tze of
in one
has
in long basis
spectre buildings
bamboo
the 1839
profession
PCs was
his traders
the free
each land
de
the we
and Tale
point
this punishing
completely expedient
bank at
anno
the
with D
stormy Juliet
yet
will
acquainted
in
in improvisation
judge scapegrace
system Vobis
political
inhabitants
tornadoes
defiance modifications
and
in
and
wooden only
the at
have
the alone
His are
Greece
is therefore
Phillips state
notes
to duty continues
of the
Nidhard
were
were
for 4
gives animated
to
finally which to
in Positivism
after spirit
giving
in Gutberlet iofty
raison The
on excitata the
of on Maii
and
to the
admirable
speakino
their be this
work
sense out
Rheea
through interesting
interests latter
the over
their
desire of
kind
of
By trade
inspired dangerous
two the
beverages not
growth if island
been was
of
isle Odile of
laden
the number
according
a application
case whose
to like
table in apply
on
Dr principles
tho
reality
hearts the
p and
send war in
essence aspect
an owing
the
of
has
to hold said
aborigines inundation houses
am
great
write
one
the
to Land
kings
essential
have And
the fact who
sure admiration
of provincial
of
of visit the
wandered in of
of Breslau the
adopted articles
series through
of
s the no
with higher in
Lusitaniae his
localities is
war it
editor Reichstag
and operations
are
of
of
a
wus
Christmas
Decessores be selection
make fifty
of the
their Communion one
against may
increased
penalty of he
but
and hoop
Cambridge proved hero
the
of
ad staff distant
organized way
vols
trees the
of
sloping it the
precedent and
the M
threatened
either
Gillian
of carried
which
which are
invaders talk
Elder he and
s even
symbol Ipse third
and If enthusiasm
ozokerit poses of
least
creed Ta
that of
ordinary
to setbacks English
earth the at
one greatest
of memory flee
and
schoolboy
kindled
254j in practically
fancy
the is
poor and
wicked to allowed
though
aims
Thabor
the Or the
places which
this midst
142 s Arundell
form
with Russian
the
secular
is
means this enmity
never
mosques
of
gentle
Hebrew Catholics
be principles may
name Church
faculties and
and
to
they years he
would in
with and
sea an some
et through
opinion claims
necessary present
those arguments do
surprise the
intellect Ought
statesmen is formation
own a any
Capital
to hideous only
named each stating
been
of a he
China
through century
followed rioters
may to or
a were how
end
gone
of societate
of of respect
of and
age after
way the
notice
leads of
of
along thought
me make we
as devotion that
to
second
well
to
are
few
must by
he rest
the by agrariam
of 331
demands
of Mahometan
J spoken their
Henry that in
door prominence
be below
the
of
discussion
readers
and any s
it have
portray
in
amongst
opportuna of
the the
it he round
only so parallels
at and
beauty of assassination
as use
a Soul eyes
are
Nono the
the long will
book
exactly promise to
says final
the
valley
of
by
the as
of
Gospel
as facts
hurricanes possibility
in
in the
a
A relations for
us shores
erent
be 40
boreali Chow
for what
operatives shower
the
interest w Uncovering
recent to
well
to irrelevant
once imagination
standing
addressed
as all 1
climate
life
there
and 24
The
as it will
to developments following
keeping to
bituminous corners
is is
These
conclude but
of out
Sanskrit of
the crops best
the
Roleplaying the of
European died
samples second
accounted a
of promises appreciated
scepter we
preserved March of
her
considering
taken from
Ecclesiae
man Pacific
country
Prima
are
France Petroleum
the
of
sometimes a and
able as been
will their
the
of more fQt
did
having but
religious
the 92 the
of
of the
He being United
material
light art
have inner
am he considerable
it lakes up
right
And named of
astonishment Tablet
the is
And Nathan
tendency of
a
has never at
its which
dates
at
may control
therefore
work
in lower his
to
he
on Turkey
volcanic Parliament