MATEC Web of Conferences 21, 02010 (2015)
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20152102010
C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2015
The coarsening effect of SA508-3 steel used as heavy
forgings material
Dong Dingqian, Cui Zhenshana , and Liu Mingxiang
National ERC for Die & Mold CAD, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200030 Shanghai, China
Abstract. SA508Gr.3 steel is popularly used to produce core unit of nuclear power reactors
due to its outstanding ability of anti-neutron irradiation and good fracture toughness.
The forging process takes important role in manufacturing to refine the grain size and
improve the material properties. But due to their huge size, heavy forgings cannot be cooled
down quickly, and the refined grains usually have long time to grow in high temperature
conditions. If the forging process is not adequately scheduled or implemented, very large
grains up to millimetres in size may be found in this steel and cannot be eliminated in the
subsequent heat treatment. To fix the condition which may causes the coarsening of the
steel, hot upsetting experiments in the industrial production environment were performed
under different working conditions and the corresponding grain sizes were measured and
analysed. The observation showed that the grain will abnormally grow if the deformation
is less than a critical value. The strain energy takes a critical role in the grain evolution. If
dynamic recrystallization consumes the strain energy as much as possible, the normal grains
will be obtained. While if not, the stored strain energy will promote abnormal growth of the
grains.
1. Introduction
The increasing energy demand has promoted the construction of higher performance and larger scale
energy equipment, which inevitably desires development of manufacturing technology as well as
material for high quality large forgings as the key components of the plant [1]. SA508 Gr.3 steel is
an alloy widely used in nuclear reactor pressure vessels (RPV) and steam generators (SG) due to its
excellent properties such as anti-neutron irradiation and good fracture toughness. Usually, the forgings
are very large whose wall thickness can even reach 700 mm [2]. Thus, the forgings often take a long
time to cool down after hot forming, giving grain a favorable opportunity for growth. In addition, for the
cooling conditions change significantly from surface to center, the microstructure may varies with the
positions, causing gradients of microstructure and mechanical properties [3–5]. Actually, partial grain
coarsening is the common defects occurring during the forming of heavy forgings. Some research has
been done to explore the relationship between the forming process and microstructure [6–8]. But it is
far enough to clearly understand the impact of working parameters on the final microstructure.
Although previous works have made great efforts to improve the application of the material, there
are still some restrictions that impede the production of the good performance components. In the
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Article available at http://www.matec-conferences.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20152102010
MATEC Web of Conferences
Table 1. Composition of SA508 Gr.3 steel (wt.%).
C Mn Ni Cr Mo V Si Al N P S Cu As Co Fe
0.18 1.4 0.79 0.14 0.51 0.005 0.22 0.024 0.0123 0.005 0.003 0.04 0.004 0.008 Balance
(a) deformation schedule (b) locations to observe grains
Figure 1. (a) The schedule of hot deformation process and (b) locations to observe grains.
long time cooling process of the material after forging, the recrystallized grain coarsening phenomenon
easily occurs if the inappropriate forging scheme is implemented, resulting in deterioration of the steel
mechanical properties. At present, there are few researches paying attentions in this field [9]. And the
mechanism of dynamically recrystallized grain coarsening is not yet clear. Therefore, further research
need to be carried out.
Our work aimed to study the grain coarsening mechanism of SA508 Gr.3 steel after hot forging,
and try to fix the condition which may cause the coarsening of the steel so as to provide the basis for
designing process parameters for large forgings.
2. Experiments
The material used is commercial SA508 Gr.3 steel, whose chemical composition is listed in Table 1.
In order to investigate the mechanism of grain coarsening, hot upsetting experiments in the industrial
production environment were performed. Cylinder specimens with a diameter of 40 mm and a height of
60 mm were heated to 1200 ◦ C at a heating rate of 15 ◦ C/s and held for 300 min to obtain a homogeneous
initial temperature by using the vacuum furnace. The holding time is so long because that in engineering
practice, the heavy forgings usually undertake very long heating time and the grains have long time to
grow. Then, they were deformed by using 320-ton hydraulic press at a ram speed of 2 mm/s till 10%,
15%, 20%, 40% and 80% of reduction were reached, respectively. Two groups of tests were carried
out to analyze the coarsening effect as is illustrated in Fig. 1(a). In the first group, the specimens after
deformation were quenched into cold water immediately. While in the second group, they were reheated
to 1200 ◦ C and held for 180 min, and then quenched. The microstructures of three different locations, as
shown in Fig. 1(b), in each specimen were observed in optical microscope.
Specimens were heated in a box-type electric resistance furnace with a thermocouple feedback
system, whose chamber was evacuated to a vacuum of approximately 0.05 Pa to avoid surface oxidation
and decarburization. The quenched specimens were sliced along the axial section, and etched in
02010-p.2
ICNFT 2015
Figure 2. Microstructures of SA508 Gr.3 steel quenched directly (a),(b),(c) and held for 3h (e),(f),(g) after
deformation with 10% reduction.
(5g saturated picric acid + 4g SDBS+100 mL H2O) solution at 65 ± 5 ◦ C for 10s to 60s to reveal
austenite grain boundaries. Microstructure was observed using Zeiss optical microscope. The grain size
was determined by using the line intercept method in two vertical directions as per ASTM E112-88.
3. Results and discussion
3.1 The fact of grain coarsening
Microstructures at three different points of the sample quenched directly (the first group samples) are
displayed sequentially and compared to the ones held at 1200 ◦ C for 3 hrs after deformation (the second
group samples), as shown in Fig. 2 thru Fig. 5, respectively corresponding to 10%, 20%, 40% and 80%
reduction. In order to explain the observed results, one needs to notice that the point A is in the hard
deformation region while point B and C are in the easy deformation region. Dynamic recrystallization
didn’t occur when reduction was 10% and 15%, and no grain refinement was observed in the first group
samples, and the second group samples received very large grains, with some of the grains were beyond
1.5 mm in size. When reduction was 20%, the grains of the first group samples were partially refined,
and the grains of the second group samples were also large but were smaller than the ones observed in
Fig. 2. When reduction was 40%, the grains at point B and C were refined by dynamic recrystallization,
while point A was partially refined because the point located in the hard deformation zone and the
dynamic recrystallization was not complete. In this case, the grains at point A and B of the second
group samples were normal large with much smaller size than the ones observed when reduction was
smaller, but the grains at point C were still very large. When the reduction was 80%, the grains of the
first group samples were well refined by the dynamic recrystallization, while the grains of the second
group samples were normal large at point A, but larger at point B and C. No matter the sample has
10% reduction or 80% reduction, it can be seen clearly that the grain size increases significantly after
being held at high temperature for 3 hrs. But the coarsening grain seems to be smaller in 80% reduction.
Among the three sample points, the amount of deformation at point A is smaller than at point B (see
Fig. 1). By comparing the morphologies of the coarsening grains at point A and B, it is found that small
02010-p.3
MATEC Web of Conferences
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
Figure 3. Microstructures of SA508 Gr.3 steel quenched directly (a),(b),(c) and held for 3h (e),(f),(g) after
deformation with 20% reduction.
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
Figure 4. Microstructures of SA508 Gr.3 steel quenched directly (a),(b),(c) and held for 3h (e),(f),(g) after
deformation with 40% reduction.
deformation (corresponding strain is smaller than a critical value) may causes bigger coarsening grains
in the subsequent high temperature environment, for example, the grain size in Fig. 2(e) may reach
1.5 mm, but it is about 400 m ∼ 600 m in Fig. 4. However, very large deformation may also causes
large grains, as observed in Fig. 4(c) and Fig. 5(b) and (c).
02010-p.4
ICNFT 2015
Figure 5. Microstructures of SA508 Gr.3 steel quenched directly (a),(b),(c) and held for 3h (e),(f),(g) after
deformation with 80% reduction.
1200
900oC 950oC 1000oC
o
1000 1050 C 1100oC 1150oC
o
1200 C 1250oC
Grain diameter, µm
Growing faster
800
Growing slower
600
400
200
0
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300
Holding time, min
Figure 6. Experimented grain growth at different heating temperatures, with no prior deformation.
3.2 The mechanism of grain coarsening
SA508. Gr3 is coarse grained steel. Our prior study has observed that, with no pre-deformation, the
grain of the steel grows slowly when temperature is below 1150 ◦ C, but very fast when temperature
is beyond that. Figure 6 shows the experimental results. Taking it as reference, we can find that, after
small deformation and holding at 1200 ◦ C for 180 min, the grains grow much faster than the ones with
no pre-deformation. Besides, the grains after large deformation (shown in Fig. 4(f), Fig. 5(e) and (f))
grow larger, too. These facts imply that deformation has certain impact on the grain coarsening if the
steel is remained in high temperature environment after hot forging.
Since the initial grain size has limited influence on the grain coarsening, the long-time holding
at high temperature coupling with inadequate deformation is the main factor promoting the grain
coarsening. The reason may lie in the differences of the strain energy in different degree of deformation.
02010-p.5
MATEC Web of Conferences
Figure 7. Peak strain at different temperature and strain rates.
When the deformation is small, dynamic recrystallization cannot occur, causing that the strain energy
accumulated in the deformation could not be released as much as possible. The remaining strain
energy is then contributed to promote grain growth in the following high temperature environment.
While, if the strain is enough to cause dynamic recrystallization, the strain energy will be totally or
partially consumed, with less energy to promote grain growth. In the small reduction cases, point B
receives much larger effective strain than point A due to non-uniform deformation. With the same
reason, the coarsening grain size at point A is bigger than at point B, because a small amount of local
recrystallization may occur at point B and reduces the driving force for grain growth.
For the sample points where the effective strain is large enough, the dynamic recrystallization can
be completely finished, but the fully accumulated strain energy may not be totally released by the
recrystallization, and the remained strain energy will take the role as driving force for grain coarsening.
Therefore, in the engineering we have to think about how to avoid the coarsening of grains in the
forging deformation. In the heavy forging practice, the effective strain in one hit is usually smaller than
the value which may cause grain coarsening after complete dynamic recrystallization, so the coarsening
effect of small deformation should be highlighted. It is well known that the peak flow stress is the
resultant value of strain hardening and recrystallization softening, so the corresponding peak strain is a
critical value to characterize the effect of dynamic recrystallization. Figure 7 shows the peak strain of
SA508 Gr.3 steel in different hot deformation condition. In engineering, if the practical effective strain
is higher than the corresponding peak stress, the dynamic recrystallization as well as the subsequent
meta-dynamic recrystallization will consume the accumulated strain energy and effectively prevent the
grain coarsening.
4. Conclusions
In this study, the mechanism of grain coarsening of SA508 Gr.3 steel forging is studied. It is concluded
that the strain energy takes a critical role in the grain evolution in heavy forging, which will become
the driving force for grain coarsening if the deformation is less than a critical value. Peak strain is
suggested as an alternative to the critical value. According to the observation, some enlightenment
could be proposed for heavy forging. Recrystallization is a key factor to prevent grain coarsening in
high temperature environment. Enough strain or deformation is important to guarantee the DRX occur
during forging process for the purpose of grain homogenization. And it is necessary to control the
finished temperature in finish forging of large parts.
02010-p.6
ICNFT 2015
This work was financially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB012903)
and National Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2012ZX04012-011).
References
[1] Y. Tanaka, I. Sato, J. Nuclear. Mat., 417 (2011) 854–859
[2] H. Pous-Romero, H. Bhadeshia, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 136 (2014) 031402–031402
[3] H. Pous-Romero, H.D.H. Bhadeshia, Metall. and Mat. Trans A, 45 (2014) 4897–4906
[4] Y.-S. Ahn, H.-D. Kim, T.-S. Byun, et al., Nuclear Eng. and Design, 194 (1999) 161–177
[5] T.S. Byun, J.H. Hong, F.M. Haggag, et al. Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping, 74 (1997) 231–238
[6] D.S. Sui, F. Chen, P.P. Zhang, Z.S. Cui, J. Iron and Steel Res. Int., 21 (2014) 1022–1029
[7] M. Sun, L. Hao, S. Li, D. Li, Y. Li, J. Nuclear Mat., 418 (2011) 269–280
[8] D. Dong, F. Chen, Z. Cui, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 634 (2015) 103–115
[9] H. Pous-Romero, I. Lonardelli, D. Cogswell, et al., Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 567 (2013) 72–79
[10] S. Uhm, J. Moon, C. Lee, J. Yoon, B. Lee, ISIJ Int., 44 (2004) 1230–1237
02010-p.7
