Moral Ecologies: Histories of Conservation,

Dispossession and Resistance Carl J. Griffin pdf

download
https://textbookfull.com/product/moral-ecologies-histories-of-conservation-dispossession-and-
resistance-carl-j-griffin/

★★★★★ 4.6/5.0 (38 reviews) ✓ 99 downloads ■ TOP RATED

"Amazing book, clear text and perfect formatting!" - John R.

DOWNLOAD EBOOK
 Moral Ecologies: Histories of Conservation, Dispossession
and Resistance Carl J. Griffin pdf download

TEXTBOOK EBOOK TEXTBOOK FULL

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide TextBook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 EDUCATIONAL COLLECTION - LIMITED TIME

INSTANT DOWNLOAD VIEW LIBRARY

Collection Highlights

Geographies of Forced Eviction: Dispossession, Violence,

Resistance 1st Edition Katherine Brickell

Biota Grow 2C gather 2C cook Loucas

Making Ecologies on Private Land Conservation Practice in

Rural Amenity Landscapes Benjamin Cooke

The Moral Psychology of Forgiveness Kathryn J. Norlock

Introduction to Intelligence Studies Carl J Jensen Iii

The University as a Site of Resistance: Identity and

Student Politics Gaurav J Pathania

The Age of Atlantic Revolution Patrick Griffin

Fundamentals of Management 8th Edition Ricky W. Griffin

The Moral Meaning of Nature Nietzsche s Darwinian Religion

and Its Critics 1st Edition Peter J. Woodford
 Palgrave Studies in
World Environmental History

MORAL ECOLOGIES
Histories of Conservation,
Dispossession and Resistance

EDITED
ED TED B
BY

Carl J. Griffin, Roy Jones,

and Iain J. M. Robertson
Palgrave Studies in World Environmental History

Series Editors
Vinita Damodaran
Department of History
University of Sussex
Brighton, UK

Rohan D’Souza
Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies
Kyoto University
Kyoto, Japan

Sujit Sivasundaram
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, UK

James John Beattie

History
Victoria University of Wellington
Wellington, New Zealand
The widespread perception of a global environmental crisis has stimu-
lated the burgeoning interest in environmental studies and has encour-
aged a range of scholars, including historians, to place the environment
at the heart of their analytical and conceptual explorations. An under-
standing of the history of human interactions with all parts of the culti-
vated and non-cultivated surface of the earth and with living organisms
and other physical phenomena is increasingly seen as an essential aspect
both of historical scholarship and in adjacent fields, such as the history of
science, anthropology, geography and sociology. Environmental history
can be of considerable assistance in efforts to comprehend the traumatic
environmental difficulties facing us today, while making us reconsider
the bounds of possibility open to humans over time and space in their
interaction with different environments. This series explores these inter-
actions in studies that together touch on all parts of the globe and all
manner of environments including the built environment. Books in the
series come from a wide range of fields of scholarship, from the sciences,
social sciences and humanities. The series particularly encourages inter-
disciplinary projects that emphasize historical engagement with science
and other fields of study.

More information about this series at

http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14570
 Carl J. Griffin · Roy Jones
Iain J. M. Robertson
Editors

Moral Ecologies
Histories of Conservation, Dispossession
and Resistance
Editors
Carl J. Griffin Roy Jones
University of Sussex Curtin University
Brighton, UK Perth, WA, Australia

Iain J. M. Robertson
University of the Highlands
and Islands
Dornoch, UK

Palgrave Studies in World Environmental History

ISBN 978-3-030-06111-1 ISBN 978-3-030-06112-8 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06112-8

Library of Congress Control Number: 2018967773

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights
of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction
on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and
retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology
now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and
information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied,
with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have
been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published
maps and institutional affiliations.

Cover illustration: Courtesy of Corbis Historical/Getty Images

This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
 Contents

1 Moral Ecologies: Histories of Conservation,

Dispossession and Resistance 1
Carl J. Griffin, Roy Jones and Iain J. M. Robertson

Part I Conservation as Dispossession

2 Politics of Conservation, Moral Ecology and Resistance

by the Sonaha Indigenous Minorities of Nepal 37
Sudeep Jana Thing

3 Global Ecologies and Local Moralities: Conservation

and Contention on Western Australia’s Gascoyne Coast 59
Roy Jones, Joseph Christensen and Tod Jones

4 From Activists to Illegally Occupying Land: Aboriginal

Resistance as Moral Ecology in Perth, Western Australia 83
Shaphan Cox and Christina Birdsall-Jones

5 Ghosts in the Forest: The Moral Ecology of

Environmental Governance Toward Poor Farmers
in the Brazilian and US Atlantic Forests 99
Scott William Hoefle

v
vi    Contents

Part II Conservation as Occupation

6 Crimes against Cultures: How Local Practices of

Regulation Shape Archaeological Landscapes in
Trowulan, East Java 129
Tod Jones and Adrian Perkasa

7 Of Necessary Work: The Longue Durée of the Moral

Ecology of the Hebridean Gàidhealtachd 159
Iain J. M. Robertson and Mary MacLeod Rivett

8 Demographic Fluidity and Moral Ecology: Queenstown

(Tasmania) and a Lesson in Precarious Process 189
Pete Hay

9 ‘Fearless, Free and Bold’: The Moral Ecology

of Kelly Country 217
Graham Seal

10 Squatting as Moral Ecology: Encroachment

and ‘Abuse’ in the New Forest, England 235
Carl J. Griffin

11 A “Moral Ecology” of Afrikaner Settlement

in German East Africa, 1902–1914 265
Thaddeus Sunseri

12 Afterword: On Moral Ecologies and Archival Absences 289

Karl Jacoby

Index 299
 Notes on Contributors

Christina Birdsall-Jones is an Adjunct Research Fellow at the John

Curtin Institute of Public Policy at Curtin University in Western
Australia. Her current research interests are Aboriginal family, kin-
ship and social identity, and Aboriginal heritage and native title. Since
joining the John Curtin Institute of Public Policy in 2007 she has con-
ducted or participated in several major research projects funded by the
Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. These projects con-
cern Aboriginal housing histories, homelessness, home ownership, hous-
ing impacts of the mining boom on Aboriginal communities, Aboriginal
household crowding, welfare conditionality and Aboriginal mobility pat-
terns. She has published in the fields of anthropology, Aboriginal hous-
ing, native title and Aboriginal tourism.
Joseph Christensen is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Asia Research
Centre, Murdoch University, in Perth, Western Australia, where he
works in the fields of maritime and environmental history. He is a grad-
uate (Ph.D., B.A. hons.) of The University of Western Australia. He is
co-editor of the collections Historical Perspectives of Fisheries Exploitation
in the Indo-Pacific (2014) and Natural Hazards and Peoples in the
Indian Ocean World (2016).
Shaphan Cox is a Senior Lecturer in Geography in the School of
Design and Built Environment at Curtin University. His research
explores the politics of space and place through representation. Recent
publications include One Day in Fremantle: TV Representation of

vii
viii    Notes on Contributors

This Alternative to Australia Day (2018), Indigenous Persistence and

Entitlement (2016), and the co-authored book Setting up the Nyoongar
Tent Embassy (2013). Shaphan’s Ph.D. (2012) research focussed on
media representations of contested spaces in the tourist-historic city of
Fremantle, Western Australia. Shaphan lectures in Human Geography
and coordinates the undergraduate programme at Curtin University
and the Graduate Certificate in Geography Teaching through Open
Universities Australia.
Carl J. Griffin is the Head of Department and Professor of Historical
Geography at the University of Sussex. A historical geographer of rural
England from the Restoration to the mid-nineteenth century, his work
has embraced histories of popular protest, including the first recent revi-
sionist study of the Swing riots, more-than-human histories, and histories
of labour and welfare. He is author of The Rural War: Captain Swing
and the Politics of Protest (2012) and Protest, Politics and Work in Rural
England, 1700–1850 (Palgrave, 2014) and (with Briony McDonagh)
Remembering Protest in Britain Since 1500: Memory, Materiality and
the Landscape (Palgrave, 2018). He is co-editor of the journals Rural
History and Southern History.
Pete Hay holds an adjunct position at University of Tasmania, where he
was previously Reader in Geography and Environmental Studies. He was
Chair of the Board of Management of Environment Tasmania. Among
many academic publication credits is Main Currents in Environmental
Thought (University of New South Wales Press/Indiana University
Press 2002, and published in Britain as A Companion to Environmental
Thought, by Edinburgh University Press). His main research interests are
place studies, with an emphasis on island studies, environmental activ-
ism and the contemporary relevance of the medieval ‘fool’ trope. He has
worked as a political staffer at both state and federal levels in Australia.
Scott William Hoefle is Full Professor in the Geography Department
of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro where he lectures in cul-
tural theory and political ecology. He completed his D.Phil. in social
anthropology at University of Oxford in 1983. Since then he has under-
taken research in north, north-east, south-east and central-west Brazil.
Relevant recent publications include ‘Fishing livelihoods, seashore tour-
ism and industrial development in coastal Rio de Janeiro’, Geographical
 Notes on Contributors    ix

Research (2014), ‘Multifunctionality, juxtaposition and conflict in the

Central Amazon’, Journal of Rural Studies (2016) and (with Ana Maria
Bicalho) ‘Conservation units, environmental services and frontier peas-
ants in the central Amazon’, Research in Economic Anthropology (2015).
Karl Jacoby is the Allan Nevins Professor of American History at the
Department of History, Columbia University in New York City. He pub-
lished Crimes against Nature: Squatters, Poachers, Thieves and the Hidden
History of American Conservation in 2001. His subsequent books
include Shadows at Dawn: A Borderlands Massacre and the Violence of
History (2008) and The Strange Career of William Ellis: The Texas Slave
Who Became a Mexican Millionaire (2016). His broader interests fall into
three main fields: environmental history; borderlands; Native American
history. His current project focuses on the aftermath of the 1846–1848
War with Mexico, looking at the incorporation of a vast swath of north-
ern Mexico into the United States.
Roy Jones, Ph.D. (Manchester) is Emeritus Professor of Geography
at Curtin University in Perth, Western Australia, where he has worked
since moving to Australia in 1970. He is a historical geographer with
particular interest in the areas of heritage and tourism. He has authored
or co-authored over 100 refereed publications including the Australian
chapter in The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity.
He was the Human Geography Editor of Geographical Research:
Journal of the Institute of Australian Geographers 2001–2009 and is a
Steering Committee Member of the International Geographical Union’s
Commission on the Sustainability of Rural Systems 2012–2020. In
2013, he was awarded a Distinguished Fellowship of the Institute of
Australian Geographers.
Tod Jones is Associate Professor of Geography at Curtin University
in Perth, Australia, and Co-Director of Curtin University’s Tourism
Research Cluster (TRC). Tod’s research interests are cultural and politi-
cal geographies in Australia and Indonesia. His current research focusses
on Indigenous heritage and urban planning, social movements and herit-
age, and developing innovative approaches to heritage management. He
is the author of Culture, Power, and Authoritarianism in the Indonesian
State. Cultural Policy Across the Twentieth Century to the Reform Era
(published by Brill). He has worked on a number of projects that sup-
port Aboriginal cultural economies in Western Australia.
x    Notes on Contributors

Adrian Perkasa is a lecturer in the Department of History, Faculty of

Humanities, Universitas Airlangga. Currently he is involved in Southeast
Asian Neighborhood Network (SEANNET) research activities, con-
ducted by the International Institute of Asian Studies, Universiteit
Leiden.
Mary MacLeod Rivett is a Senior Casework Officer at Historic
Environment Scotland, and former lecturer in Archaeology at the
University of the Highlands and Islands, and crofter. Her background
is in the early mediaeval archaeology of the North Atlantic region, with
particular interests in the development of urbanism in Scandinavia,
on which she wrote her doctoral thesis at the University of Glasgow
in 1999. More recently, however, following eleven years as Regional
Archaeologist for the Western Isles (Outer Hebrides), her work has
focussed on material expressions of identity in times of cultural change,
and particularly the expression and definition of cultural identity through
the use of the wider landscape.
Iain J. M. Robertson is a Reader in History at the University of the
Highlands and Islands. He has had a career-long interest in the histori-
cal geography of local community and landscape change with a particu-
lar emphasis on the early twentieth-century Scottish Highlands. The
focus of this research has been on popular protest—the Highland Land
Wars—and the sense of place and identity located, made and maintained
therein. His most recent monograph—Landscapes of Protest in the Scottish
Highlands After 1914 (Ashgate, 2012)—reflects that interest. From there
he has helped to open up new perspectives on actions in protest, heav-
ily influenced by non-representational theory, Ingold’s Taskscapes and
Jacoby’s moral ecologies.
Graham Seal holds a personal chair as Professor of Folklore at Curtin
University, Western Australia. His research often focuses on the inter-
sections of myth and history, particularly in relation to war and outlaw
heroes, or ‘social bandits’, on which topics he has written widely. Most
recently, he has published Outlaw Heroes in Myth and History (Anthem
Press, 2011), The Soldiers’ Press: Trench Journals in the First World War
(Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) and The Savage Shore (Yale University Press,
2016). Since 2009 he has authored the best-selling ‘Great Australian
Stories’ series (Allen and Unwin), bringing academic research to a
general readership. In 2007 he was made a Member of the Order of
Australia in recognition of his work.
 Notes on Contributors    xi

Thaddeus Sunseri is a Professor of African History at Colorado State

University. He is author of Vilimani: Labor Migration and Rural
Change in Early Colonial Tanzania, 1884–1915 (Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann, 2002) and Wielding the Ax: Scientific Forestry and Social
Conflict in Tanzania, c. 1820–2000 (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press,
2009). His current research on the social and environmental history of
cattle plague (rinderpest) in East Africa has appeared in the Journal of
Historical Geography (2013), the Bulletin of the History of Medicine
(2015), and Labor History (2018).
Sudeep Jana Thing is an early career researcher who has worked as
a research academic and sessional staff member in the Department
of Planning and Geography at Curtin University, Western Australia.
His Ph.D. research examined contestations between a Sonaha indige-
nous minority group and national park management in Nepal in terms
of the political ecology of conservation. He has authored several refer-
eed articles and book chapters. Before starting his academic career, he
worked with non-governmental organisations in Nepal on socio-cultural
and political aspects of conservation. He is an associate member of the
ICCA Consortium, and a member of the IUCN World Commission on
Protected Areas.
 List of Figures

Fig. 2.1 The Karnali river delta and the Bardia National Park (BNP),
mid-western lowland Nepal (Source Author using ArcGIS) 39
Fig. 2.2 Kafthans, and lineage-based allocations of gold panning areas
(not to scale) (Source Author’s field notes) 43
Fig. 3.1 Gascoyne Coast, showing Shark Bay and Ningaloo Coast
World Heritage Areas (Source Joseph Christensen) 61
Fig. 5.1 Remaining “visible” primary forest in 1920 (a); planted
and regenerated forest in 1993 (b) 106
Fig. 5.2 Brazilian biomes and political map 109
Fig. 5.3 Organic cropping in bottomlands and forest regeneration
on slopes (Source Author, field research, 2013) 117
Fig. 6.1 A personal collection of small statue heads. 2016
(Photograph by Tod Jones) 139
Fig. 6.2 Sabar. A bronze bust of the artist. Date unknown
(Photograph by Tod Jones with permission of Hariadi Sabar) 142
Fig. 6.3 Bajang Rau in Trowulan, Mojokerto, East Java, Indonesia
(Photograph by Tod Jones) 147
Fig. 6.4 The Buddhist Wihara in Trowulan (Photograph by Tod Jones) 148
Fig. 6.5 Rice drying in front of the Watu Ombo shrine, Trowulan,
East Java 149
Fig. 6.6 Candi Brahu, a reconstructed Buddhist temple at
Trowulan, East Java (Photograph by Tod Jones 2017) 150
Fig. 7.1 Location map (Courtesy of Anne Campbell) 163
Fig. 8.1 Locations of Queenstown and Upper North Esk 195
Fig. 8.2 The derelict balcony of Hunter’s Hotel from which King
O’Malley delivered fiery political speeches 199

xiii
 CHAPTER 1

Moral Ecologies: Histories of Conservation,

Dispossession and Resistance

Carl J. Griffin, Roy Jones and Iain J. M. Robertson

I go back my full life knowing about it [the common] … my father before

him as well, went right, back. So he was very protective of it in his day
… What his idea was … It’s a piece of limestone grassland, basically, and
that’s what it should still be … our common was in the condition that it
is now because of the way … it has been looked after. One of the biggest
differences between all my life and all my father’s life—and his father, but
we won’t go on to that…1
If we thought for some reason it [the common] was getting a little bit
dodgy, and there were one or two places where the grass did grow, because
the cattle couldn’t get to them, because it was down the bank, and if it
was really ripping through it, we would put a bit out ourselves. We’d say,
“We’ll keep that edge back, away from the wood,” or whatever.2

C. J. Griffin (*)
Department of Geography, University of Sussex, Brighton, England, UK
R. Jones
Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
I. J. M. Robertson
University of the Highlands and Islands, Dornoch, Scotland, UK

© The Author(s) 2019 1

C. J. Griffin et al. (eds.), Moral Ecologies,
Palgrave Studies in World Environmental History,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06112-8_1
2 C. J. GRIFFIN ET AL.

The practice of burning the grassland on the common of the

Gloucestershire parish of Sheepscombe ended in the early 1980s. As the
common-side cottages of the small villages nestled in the valleys north of
Stroud, immortalised in Laurie Lee’s Cider with Rosie (1959),3 were sold
to those who sought a rural idyll away from the soot and noise of the
city, the established, vernacular ways of managing the common fell into
disuse and even disrepute. The customary winter practice of burning the
old, dead grass on the local commons to encourage new growth did not
meet with the approval of those who wanted clean air and calm, rather
than the ash, smell and seeming chaos of the common ablaze. Approval
for this practice was similarly withheld by the forebears of English
Nature, the organisation which became officially involved in the manage-
ment of the common in 1984: burning was not something allowed in
a National Nature Reserve or a Site of Special Scientific Interest. But it
was, in the words of one long-time resident, the regime of burning and
the grazing of cattle that “kept the common a common … Burning and
grazing together was excellent.”4 So, when the commoners stopped com-
moning, the end of burning and grazing allowed the grassland to slowly
become scrub, and the scrub to become woodland. Intervention, in the
form of scrub clearance and the lopping of trees, therefore became nec-
essary in order to preserve grassland habitats. Or, to put it another way,
in the attempt to conserve the local commons, they effectively stopped
being commons. A vernacular, informal and unwritten way of managing
the common as a space which had sustainably supported the commoners
for generations, gave way, in the name of conservation, to a new way of
managing the common emanating from statute and national policy.
This issue, in microcosm, embodies the arguments, ideas and con-
flicts that define this book. The case studies that follow demonstrate how
and, to some extent, even why elite conservation schemes and policies
can often inscribe customary and vernacular forms of managing com-
mon resources as variants of banditry—and how and why the ‘bandits’
fight back. Our inspirations are many but foremost is a volume which
will surely go down as one of the classics of early twenty-first century his-
torical writing: Karl Jacoby’s endlessly suggestive and powerful Crimes
against Nature: Squatters, Poachers, Thieves and the Hidden History of
American Conservation. First published in 2001 and, as a revised edition
in 2014, Jacoby’s book ostensibly rests on a simple hypothesis: namely
that the early history of the conservation movement in the United States
was ­premised on denying the customary practices of those who lived in
 1 MORAL ECOLOGIES: HISTORIES OF CONSERVATION, DISPOSSESSION … 3

areas newly inscribed as national parks and labelling many of their land
use and survival practices as ‘crimes against nature.’ Simply put, and in
line with Jacoby’s subtitle, dwelling without deeds in these parks was
now to be an illegal squatter; to take game to eat was to poach; and
to take wood and other biotic and mineral resources to fuel and build
homes was to steal. The denial and inscription of these practices sug-
gested that they were Crimes against Nature not only because of shifts
in the law and federal policy but also because they were carried out sup-
posedly indiscriminately and with no regard for the sustainability of these
now hallowed and protected spaces. And yet, Jacoby shows how these
alleged plunderers of the environment not only acted in ways which we
might understand to be sustainable but also used community sanctions
against those who did abuse their unwritten, vernacular laws of place, or
what Jacoby calls their ‘moral ecology.’5
Our starting contention, following Jacoby, is that the language and
practices of conservation often dispossess poor indigenous peoples and
settlers representing their lifestyles and livelihoods as threats to the sus-
tainability of the land, and that such peoples therefore resist by contin-
uing to live their everyday lives as they had always done, frequently in
defiance of the new laws and regulations of ‘conservation.’ We use the
word ‘starting’ deliberately. What follows, both in this introduction but
more importantly in the thematic chapters, further develops and chal-
lenges this definition. Indeed, this book presents an extension and appli-
cation of Jacoby’s approach and conceptual framework, taking moral
ecology beyond the specific study of the early days of the US national
parks and applying and testing it in a variety of spatial, temporal and
cultural contexts. It takes both a global stance and a temporally deep
perspective, examining the complex ways in which local custom and
state and even international claims to conservation and their resultant
attempts to restrict and dispossess collide in a variety of contexts from
the early eighteenth century to the past in the present. Intriguingly,
moral ecology as a concept is worn lightly in Crimes against Nature and
is only explicitly articulated on two separate pages.6 If, therefore, our aim
in this collection is to test the validity of moral ecology beyond its orig-
inal context, it is also, at heart, an attempt to extend and to firm up this
most suggestive of concepts. Collectively, we aim to do this in three key
ways. First, we examine several forms of dispossession which have been
enacted in the name of conservation and attempt to understand their
4 C. J. GRIFFIN ET AL.

­ istories, not least in terms of the manner in which past policy decisions
h
underpin contemporary ways of being and conflict. Second, this collec-
tion examines those acts of being in place by local populations which,
to draw on the phenomenology of Martin Heidegger, serve to resist the
discourses and schemes of elite conservation by asserting, as anthropol-
ogist Tim Ingold would have it, the right to dwell.7 Finally, our aim to
bring moral ecology more into the light of academic scrutiny is pred-
icated upon bringing our chapters into dialogue with each other and,
more fundamentally, with the progenitor of the concept, Karl Jacoby.
In so doing, we do not claim that all conservation schemes represented
clandestine—or even overt—attempts to dispossess. Many conservation
schemes, past and present, have undeniably been socially and ecologi-
cally well-intentioned and carefully constituted. Nor are we claiming that
conservation per se always privileges environmental and material worlds
before human ones. Indeed, examples abound of conservation schemes
either instigated to protect threatened and marginalised populations or
to preserve access, something now given force in the UNESCO-WIPO
World Forum on the Protection of Folklore and its advocacy for the pro-
tection of ‘intangible cultural heritage.’8 Rather, we seek to demonstrate
the remarkable depth and persistence, across space and time, of how the
languages and practices of conservation, and of how attempts to prevent
‘abuses’ and ‘spoil’, have been used to dispossess. In doing so, we also
highlight the centrality of claims for the purification of space by race and
class, a practice especially evident in the making of settler colonialism.
This, then, is a book about a world all too readily lost in the shad-
ows. Our concern is with the murky subtexts of rational and scientific
management principles and with the popular responses thereto, both
clandestine and dramatic acts of protest and everyday forms of resist-
ance, and therefore with James Scott’s ‘hidden transcripts’ of the poor.9
It is also necessarily a book about ‘commons,’ those spaces in which
resources—in this context ‘natural’ resources—are held and managed in
common rather than being subject to the exclusive and exclusionary doc-
trines of private or state property rights. We use inverted commas here
deliberately: for while commons were—and, in many places, continue to
be hard, material entities—this noun has long since transcended these
(literally) grounded signifiers. In part in response to Garret Hardin’s
provocative ‘tragedy of the commons’ thesis, and to broader concerns
about renewed forms of dispossession and privatisation, ‘commons’ has
 1 MORAL ECOLOGIES: HISTORIES OF CONSERVATION, DISPOSSESSION … 5

become an adjective, a concept and a metaphor for a far broader range of

relationships over the use and regulation of commonable things material
and conceptual (on which more below).10
This collection brings together historians, geographers, anthropol-
ogists, archaeologists, folklorists and critical heritage studies theorists
united by a shared interest in ‘commons,’ offering a range of different
approaches and insights to Jaboby’s moral ecology and drawing upon
a diverse ‘archive’ embracing official documents, oral testimonies and
material culture. What follows in this introductory chapter establishes the
argument of the book and grounds the diverse individual chapters, with
a flushing and fleshing out of Jacoby’s ‘moral ecology’ concept. At the
same time, however, we weave into this explication a detailed discussion
of the influences that underpin moral ecology—both as explicitly attested
in Crimes against Nature and more broadly—drawing on the founda-
tional works on rural resistance by E. P. Thompson, Eric Hobsbawm and
James Scott, on environmental history, and, critically, on the subaltern
studies movement.11 We adopt this integrated approach here in part to
locate Jacoby’s concept of moral ecology more firmly within the litera-
ture to which it clearly belongs. We also relate this concept to the new
protest studies literature, a body of work which, to its detriment, has
hitherto given little attention to moral ecology.12 In part, we take this
approach to our narrative because although the story of the development
of moral ecology intersects with the historiography of rural resistance
only infrequently, it does so at important ‘moments’ in that story. Finally,
this introduction maps out the themes and structure of the book, intro-
ducing and lacing together the arguments of the separate chapters.

Moral Ecology: Concept and Roots

The intellectual trajectory underlying moral ecology is a fascinat-
ing one. Jacoby’s concept is first apparent in an embryonic form in a
paper on “Class and Environmental History” published in the journal
Environmental History.13 Here, Jacoby signals his interest in the early
icons of the North American conservation movement by offering a case
study of what he sees as a class war in the nascent Adirondacks Park.
To approach class in this way—through the lens of environmental his-
tory—was an important innovation. Even by the late 1990s, the topic
of class relations had rarely surfaced in the work of those who wrote on
the American conservation movement. There was, Jacoby has argued,
6 C. J. GRIFFIN ET AL.

a certain blindness to class differentiations in this context. Further, the

intellectual closeness between early environmental history and the con-
servation movement acted to obscure the ways in which conservation
schemes, whether intentionally or not, might act to dispossess the indig-
enous and settled poor.
Fascinatingly, and seemingly in the face of his earlier paper, Crimes
against Nature began, as the author relates in his preface, as a conven-
tional work of American environmental history, an analysis of the ‘wil-
derness cult’ that developed in late nineteenth-century America.14 And,
in many ways, his book remains firmly rooted in the pantheon of envi-
ronmental history, the doctoral thesis, from which the book emerged,
being supervised by no less an environmental history luminary than Bill
Cronon.15 Moreover, Jacoby’s central theme of conservation and its
temporal framing—the key moments in the making of the environmental
movement—are located at the very heart of the Nashian environmental
history project.16 Indeed, to read the endnotes, and the acknowledge-
ments, is to read a who’s who of American environmental history.17
It is clear, however, that Jacoby was dancing to a different tune.
Simultaneously, he was listening to the siren calls of the cultural turn and
of the history from below movement.18 What emerged in his subsequent
writings is an environmental history told differently, a novel collision
with many of the very different concerns of social history, not least class,
conflict and criminality. Importantly, however, Crimes against Nature
emerged virtually alongside Bill Cronon’s provocation around the cul-
ture (to eschew the word ‘nature’) of ‘wilderness.’ In taking a similarly
cultural turn, Jacoby too saw that social and environmental relations
were both irreducibly interwoven with and have given rise to “the mate-
rial reality that we call nature”.19
None of this is to say that, before that point, environmental his-
tory was acritical. Indeed, the defining contribution of Cronon’s work
is to bring a critical sensibility to environmental history.20 Nor is it to
say Jacoby broke entirely new ground in studying the social unrest that
conservation policies and practices so often wrought. As Jacoby put it
himself: “Having begun this study with the sense that I was voyaging
alone into uncharted territory, I have been pleased to encounter sev-
eral fellow explorers of conservation’s hidden history along the way.”21
Rather, it is to note that Jacoby’s conceptual influences transcended the
environmental history canon. For while, as Donald Worster suggested,
“Environmental history [in the US] was… born out of a moral purpose,
 1 MORAL ECOLOGIES: HISTORIES OF CONSERVATION, DISPOSSESSION … 7

with strong political commitments behind it,”22 Jacoby’s different and

antithetical ‘morals’ challenged the elitist, exclusionary morality of early
conservationism which failed to see any worth in the lives and lifeworlds
of those who were captured within and around the physical and con-
ceptual boundaries of the Adirondack Park.23 Consequently, for many
Adirondackers, the most striking feature of conservation was its recon-
ceptualisation of many long-standing local practices as crimes: hunt-
ing as ‘poaching,’ the cutting of trees as ‘timber theft,’ foraging as
‘trespassing.’24
If the notion of moral ecology is never actually given this name in
his initial paper, it is present in embryonic form. Everyday resistance to
the imposition of new values from without and above is exposed, as is
local and communal support for such practices and the refusal to aban-
don those activities which had been criminalised. This resistance is tem-
pered, however, by the recognition of clear bounds to acceptable practice
and attempts (if not always successes) at internal regulation. The strong
vein of archival material tapped in this early exploration of moral ecol-
ogy flows ever more strongly in Crimes against Nature. It is in Jacoby’s
book-length treatment where the concept emerges fully formed as a spe-
cific attempt to explain the dwelt experience of conservation as locally
practised and to write an environmental history from below.
Beyond question, when historians of any hue pull back the curtain on
the ‘shadow world’ of the subaltern, as Jacoby does in his story of con-
flict that centred on resource utilisation, their debt to the history from
below movement is profound. Moral ecology is no exception to this.
With the touchstones of the concept readily acknowledged by Jacoby,
the moral belief system of the rural poor, accessed via the rereading of
elite documents and inspired by the subaltern school of Indian studies,
saw their activities captured under the category and concept of social
crime. Jacoby has adopted perspectives rooted in a movement which
originated partly in the historians group of the British Communist Party
and partly in the pages of the journal Past and Present. To unashamedly
re-use one of the most frequently deployed quotations by those who
seek to write the experiences and perspectives of ordinary people, here
are the intellectual and political origins of a project which sought

…to rescue the poor stockinger, the Luddite cropper, the “obsolete”
handloom weaver, the utopian artisan and even the deluded follower of
Joanna Southcott, from the enormous condescension of posterity.25
8 C. J. GRIFFIN ET AL.

The formidable figure, intellect and oeuvre of Edward Thompson

sit at the centre of moral ecology. In drawing Thompson’s moral econ-
omy into dialogue with the concept of social crime, Jacoby both follows
a well-trodden path and brings together the founding fathers of protest
studies: Thompson and Eric Hobsbawm. Thompson sees, in English
eighteenth-century crowd actions, the assertion of a moral universe and
economy as against the very different world view of the then hegemonic
political economy. It is this sense of the moral, simply understood as the
popular consensus over the right and proper way of behaving, acting
and believing across society and social relations, that is the wellspring of
moral ecology. So it is that, having issued the initial critiques that envi-
ronmental history had hitherto been little concerned with the social and
the demotic, and that conservationists and historians had been too quick
to view all acts of opposition as malice-laden evidence of rural backward-
ness and deviance,26 Jacoby draws on Thompson’s concept of moral
economy as offering the ideal definition and model for ‘recreating’ the
“moral universe that shaped local transgressions of conservation laws.”
In “glimps[ing]” into “the pattern of beliefs, practices and traditions
that governed how ordinary rural folk interacted with the environment.”
Here we see a complex and consistent value system, a vision of nature
‘from the bottom up’ that offers a radically different take on the forms
and purposes of human–environment entanglements.27 In asserting this,
Jacoby is not only drawing on Thompson’s seminal studies of the shared
values of the eighteenth-century English crowd in relation to the fair
retailing of foodstuffs but he is also inspired by Thompson’s analysis of
the battle between vernacular resource use and the imposition of state
will in the Crown forests of southern England. It is the great strength of
moral ecology that, even though Thompson’s moral economy has argu-
ably been subject to more scrutiny and has been transposed to a greater
number of contexts than any other concept ever penned by a social histo-
rian, it draws also on Whigs and Hunters, the central thesis of which has
hitherto been less influential outside Britain.28
Thus Jacoby’s work—a telling of the ways in which customary prac-
tices in a settler society were reinscribed as offences against conserving
natural things—while it is inevitably similar to Thompson’s analysis of the
forests of Berkshire, Hampshire and Surrey, develops these ideas to bring
moral economy and social crime into dialogue. This is indeed something
of an innovation since, in the early protest historiography, these issues
 1 MORAL ECOLOGIES: HISTORIES OF CONSERVATION, DISPOSSESSION … 9

were treated somewhat separately. The identification and classification of

practices made illegal by the policing state, but regarded by rural work-
ers as being part of their customary code (‘social crime’) was pioneered
by Eric Hobsbawm.29 In a series of influential essays, Hobsbawm began
the work which established a number of key parameters that frame the
concept.30 These include law breaking as a more-or-less deliberate act
of resistance, with the criminal as a conduit for widely held social griev-
ances. This points to a second framing element, that of the existence of
wide community support for the transgressive act—an element intro-
duced into the oeuvre in the pages of the ground-breaking Albion’s Fatal
Tree.31 Critical here, for moral ecology, was the assertion, expressed most
clearly by John Rule, that this sanction came from communally held
beliefs that such acts, though reinscribed as illegal, were not in fact crim-
inal.32 Finally, and the most important element that has fed into moral
ecology is the recognition that social crime involved the criminalisation
of hitherto customary behaviours, rights and beliefs. Consequently, and
central to the formulation of moral ecology, was the revelation, in the
pages of Albion’s Fatal Tree, that activities such as poaching, wood-
taking, sheep-stealing, smuggling and coastal ‘wrecking’ all embodied
an element of social dissent which was carried out with the support of
the working community and in defiance of the law. Crime, as any critical
legal theorist will concur, was and is socially defined.
It is at this point, however, where the study of rural defiance, dissent
and disturbance rather ground to a halt. Much subsequent effort was
expanded on delineating protest’s multifarious trajectories and diverse
geographies in a stately gavotte that has been charged by one of the cur-
rent authors as more closely resembling “two steps forward; six steps
back.”33 Until comparatively recently, the consequences of this Brownian
motion-like activity have been the ossifying, if not actually the withering
away, of any prospects for greater conceptual innovation in the field of
protest studies.34
By contrast, moral ecology carries clear echoes of wider and growing
debates in the humanities and social and environmental sciences con-
cerning the relationship of indigenous and poor settled peoples to the
land and to other biotic resources. In this way—by turning to the cul-
tural meanings of nature—Jacoby draws attention to the position of
rural subalterns in, to borrow David Featherstone’s phrase, “the con-
testation of particular relations between humans, animals and spaces.”35
10 C. J. GRIFFIN ET AL.

Indeed, the perspectives of subaltern studies feature large in Crimes

against Nature—even if the ‘unofficial mind’ that Jacoby’s counter-
narrative exposes is that of conservation’s practices and consequences—
“the attitudes of country people towards nature.” By contrast, the origi-
nal subaltern project was concerned with “how to reconfigure or rewrite
the problem of class relations within a social formation which could not
be described as a fully developed industrial economy.”36
These diverse threads constitute the warp and weft of moral ecology
as it met top-down scientific conservation in the differing and conflict-
ing social enrolments of the non-human: plants; animals; technologies.
These assemblages—to draw on the concept of Gilles Deleuze and
Félix Guattari—of all these things were articulated and legitimised in
bottom-up protests through claims to the natural right of subsistence
and to custom.37 The upshot was that “country people often spun a web
of local use rights that held the natural world in a tight embrace” and
from which materialised a set of beliefs and practices that appropriated
natural resources for purposes of basic subsistence. In short, rural folk
sought to “impose a common rights doctrine from below.”38
A further, and perhaps final, thread from which Jacoby wove moral
ecology is captured in Timothy Beatley and Kristy Manning’s view that
“a sustainable community … nurtures a sense of place by understanding
and respecting its bioregional context … [it] … respects the history and
character of those existing features that nurture a sense of attachment
to, and familiarity with place.”39 For Jacoby, sustainability is rooted in
a vernacular and quotidian view of nature which, in turn, interacts with
community, its socio-economic norms and practices, and with both place
and taskscape—a space of human activity defined and bounded by the
practices performed therein—to form the bedrock of moral ecology.
A shared understanding of the interactions of ecology, economy and
society, forged over generations, modulates the ecological base to local
lifeworlds, and prescribes and frames sustainable and context-specific
resource utilisation practices. Moral ecology, in short, embraces a set of
vernacular “beliefs, practices and traditions that governed how rural folk
interacted” with their local environments.40
For the encroaching bureaucratic state and its early leisured prac-
tices of elite hunting, it was the whole apparatus of moral ecology that
lay beyond their bounds of acceptability. Conservation’s ambition was
therefore to (re)define, delimit and proscribe vernacular and indigenous
ways of being in the world. In order to achieve this, the instigators of
 1 MORAL ECOLOGIES: HISTORIES OF CONSERVATION, DISPOSSESSION … 11

conservation movements enacted new laws by which to prosecute the

newly criminalised, thereby concretising a set of fundamental opposi-
tions around laws, beliefs and values in which both sides were seeking to
buttress “what kind of society they should inhabit and how this society
should relate to the natural world around it.”41
Sitting alongside this conceptual framing, Jacoby’s preferred
method was to allow demotic views and resistances to emerge in these
lifespaces.42 He turns, in short, to three weighty case studies of conflict
between moral and managerial beliefs and that is where we must follow
him. In the Adirondacks, Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon, time and
time again, local inhabitants found what they understood as legitimate
ways of utilising the natural world proscribed and what they understood
as their hunting and fishing areas sealed off. In the Adirondacks, moreo-
ver, it was the growth of private parks which presented the greatest chal-
lenge to their lifespaces, physically enclosing the best grounds over which
rural folks would roam and out of which was fashioned their individual
and collective biographies and their environmental relations. One such
vernacular practice involved grass burning to encourage a spring flush.43
These fallow fires were swiftly reinscribed as arson. But the resultant
significant growth in their number following reinscription was, Jacoby
asserts, something more than simply a criminal response or revenge, it
was the means by which Adirondackers asserted their, and the forest’s,
freedom from state management.44
These nuanced insights into the moral ecology of the rural poor con-
tinue in Jacoby’s Yellowstone. Here, poaching is revealed as being both
multi-faceted and as considerably more morally ambiguous than most
other studies allow. In particular, the practice could be contested from
within the poaching community: there were, in short, acceptable and unac-
ceptable poaching performances. Perhaps the best example of this nuanced
understanding is found in Jacoby’s approach to communal support for
criminal activities, a foundation stone of the notion of social crime.45 As
laid out by David Hay in his study of eighteenth-century poaching on
Cannock Chase in the English Midlands, “a wall of silence” would greet
estate keepers when seeking information, but they faced word spreading
“like lightening” when they came to serve a search warrant. By contrast,
Jacoby shows that there were clear limits to communal support and that,
when given, it could be provided grudgingly or even under coercion.46
This subtle reworking of the interactions of customary right, econ-
omy, society and culture as expressed through social crime, continues
12 C. J. GRIFFIN ET AL.

with Jacoby’s third case study, which offers his clearest example of moral
ecology as a sustainable approach to resource utilisation from below.
The Grand Cañon Forest Reserve was created in 1893, with the local
Havasupai people almost overnight being reinscribed as squatters and
poachers, although it took some time for this policy to be enacted on
the ground. The Havasupai used the Grand Cañon plateau on a sea-
sonal transient basis, a lifespace and a timeframe that did not fit well with
rational and managerialist conservation discourse. In fact, such was the
disjuncture between these two ways of interacting with the Grand Cañon
environment that it took a number of years before the Havasupai appre-
hended the fact that their nomadic lifespace had been proscribed. To this
they resisted in a number of interlocking ways. Havasupai claimed ‘prior
right’ to resource utilisation, based on the fact that both Indian and deer
had been there before the white man and were part of well-established
assemblages of the human and non-human. Confusingly to them, this
prior right was only secured by the continuous performance of those
rights. To fail to use this—overwintering in the traditional places or
hunting deer—meant that the right had ceased to exist, an idea without
meaning to the Havasupai. Conversely, the hunt and other cultural forms
carried deep meaning for them. Havasupai environmental practices and
performances—lifescape and identity—were thus inextricably intertwined
and buttressed by a vernacular moral ecology.47
Further, Jacoby demonstrates that, for the Havasupai, a success-
ful hunt both relied on significant preparatory rituals and delineated
the passage into manhood. On one level, to hunt drew the natural and
supernatural even closer together—with ‘game shamans’ playing a piv-
otal role—but, on another level, the distribution of any kill among the
community reinforced ties of kin and obligation.48 What is revealed by
these case studies is layer upon layer of informal, local and quotidian
interactions and assemblages, not static bur rather constantly evolving,
between indigenous peoples, settlers and the non-human. These inter-
actions, from which emerged a moral ecological taskscape, were, at the
same time, mutually supportive and constitutive but were also delimited
by a “bounded, circular, jealously possessive consciousness.”49

Moral Ecology: Parallels

The great strength of Crimes against Nature is that it offers a con-
vincing example of the critically important interdisciplinary conversa-
tions between the social and environmental sciences; between historical
 1 MORAL ECOLOGIES: HISTORIES OF CONSERVATION, DISPOSSESSION … 13

geography, and environmental, social and cultural histories. This is the

ground upon which the current volume rests and which, with significant
insights from subaltern studies, has reinvigorated and propelled forward
the study of protest histories. It was a missed opportunity, therefore
that, until very recently, the field of protest studies has ignored the pos-
sibilities offered by Jacoby’s monograph and by his articulation of moral
ecology in particular. This interaction, notwithstanding clear indications
of the power and utility of these broader conversations, did emerge at
about the same time as Crimes against Nature, in the work of Jeanette
Neeson and Brian Short in particular.50 Both have placed the sustenance
of the body and the culture of plebeian households at the centre of their
analyses and have convincingly shown how critical the maintenance of
common rights was thereunto. What emerges from their work is an
appreciation of everyday lives as the taskscape, as something enmeshed
with landscapes and the senses:

within which to work, to court and socialise … a space within which land-
owners, tenant farmers, cottagers and landless labourers were bound in a
mutuality of exchange … dependent upon a local discourse concerning
exactly what could and could not be undertaken on the Forest …. activi-
ties which were socially recognised, which were part of the landscape, and
which … gave a sense of belonging to a community.51

Perhaps even more than Short’s analyses, Neeson’s work on commons

and commoners is an important step out of the blind alley into which
protest studies had turned by the late 1980s. To break the mould, to
convincingly turn away from the old shibboleths and to pay full respect
to the protestors and their motivations, has required commentators to
engage with the ‘infrapolitics’ of conflict and resistance. In this, there
are elements of a broader trend in protest studies away from a monoc-
ular focus on overt disturbance and towards the work of James C. Scott
and what Michael Braddick and Walter term, in their Negotiating Power
in Early Modern England, as the tactics by which the relatively pow-
erless seek to defend their interests.’52 Indeed, the impact of James C.
Scott’s twin conceptualisations of everyday forms of peasant resistance
and of hidden transcripts has been profound.53 These emerge in a body
of work, which weaves together cultural and political anthropology and
political theory to explore the exigencies and conflicts that inhere to
rural life. This initiative has injected considerable intellectual energy and
a new dynamism and vigour into intellectual engagements with socially
14 C. J. GRIFFIN ET AL.

criminal behaviours and the study of peasant resistance more generally.

As with Jacoby, Thompson and much of the history from below move-
ment more generally, Scott’s body of work developed out of a concern
to understand the transitions to capitalism in agrarian social relations
and the resultant resistances to this shift. An additional underlying con-
cern lies with recovering the agency and ideologies of the rural poor.
Ultimately, however, Scott’s formulation of everyday forms of resistance
derives from his understanding of class relations and from the probability
that the rural poor and their masters mutually recognised the advantages
of avoiding open confrontation. It is here that Scott follows Thompson
and foreshadows Jacoby in foregrounding custom and usage and the
everyday ‘weapons of the weak’ such as “foot-dragging, dissimulation,
desertion, false compliance, pilfering, feigned ignorance, sabotage.”54
Once the mould had been broken, even though the gaze of new pro-
test historians failed to alight on moral ecology, it did turn to the pos-
sibilities offered by both environmental histories (more generally) and
subaltern studies.55 Perspectives that have been drawn together in the
work of Ramachandra Guha, who has repeatedly shown the critical reli-
ance of the Indian rural poor ‘past and present’ on the sustainable use of
ecological resources in their communities. In such contexts, issues of sus-
tainability are key: the idea that, without the need of outside regulation
and forms of control, such communities carefully protect, and indeed
must protect, that which is needed to carry on the future life of the com-
munity.56 Against this, attempts to impose outside regulations and rules
restricting demotic uses of biological resources—what Arun Agrawal has
called ‘environmentality,’ the technologies of environmental govern-
ance—have been a persistent theme in recent protest scholarship, fusing
understandings of environmental management with ideas of privatisation
(‘enclosure’) and forms of colonial and state dispossession.57 This is not
to say that all such work has focused entirely on ideas of one-way con-
trol; for instance Adil Najam has shown how systems that were initially
in conflict can be resolved to mutually beneficial environmental ends.58
Rather, and in common with Jacoby, it is to acknowledge that top-down,
external and elite environmental schemes, whatever their intentions,
invariably generate conflict and can thereby provoke resistance to such
attempts at dispossession from those we ought to recognise as internal
subalterns. This is certainly the subtext, if not the actual text, of recent
work on the processes of those acts of dispossession and privatisation that
 1 MORAL ECOLOGIES: HISTORIES OF CONSERVATION, DISPOSSESSION … 15

comprised the English enclosure movement. Additionally, as McDonagh

and Griffin suggest:

It is important to note that the lessons learnt from enclosing rural England
were directly applied in the carving up and making private property of
those sovereign states the British Empire colonised. In this way, privatisa-
tion and colonisation are intertwined in land, and struggles against priva-
tisation and colonisation similarly rooted in the soil of the dispossessed.59

Attempts to ‘thicken’ our understandings of enclosure (broadly

defined) and the responses thereto by rural subalterns form the core of
a literature that aims to entangle environmental, social and cultural his-
tories and geographies of dispossession and resistance.60 The most sig-
nificant strand of this way of writing, moreover, is that which draws a
recognition of hybridity and of the dynamic and constitutive role of
nature/culture relations into the discussion.61 Thus hedges and trees
come to be recognised as actants in the enclosure drama, with the lat-
ter understood as being the ‘living capital’ of those instigating major
socio-economic change in the English countryside. In this view, attacks
on trees became forms of everyday resistance to these changes by those
who had been denied access to these resources, with both flora and
fauna inducing a cultural myopia within eighteenth- and early nine-
teenth-century state silviculture schemes.62 In one instance, the capabili-
ties and roles of both mice and rabbits in oppositional assemblages of the
non-human and human simply passed unrecognised.63
In all this, finally, the ground has been laid for the successful and over-
due return of moral ecology back home. For too long, Jacoby’s study of
the shadow world of North American conservation has remained in the
shadows of protest studies. Illustrative of this is the fact that, while one
of the most important recent contributions to the perspectives embraced
by this volume—Featherstone’s study of the Irish eighteenth-century
peasant protest movement—explores and expands the utility of subal-
tern political ecology, a way of thinking that finds its way into Crimes
against Nature, Jacoby’s arguably more persuasive and appropriate
concept was not even offered up as a comparator. This certainly cannot
be said for students of dispossession and resistance beyond Britain and
Europe. Here, even though Crimes against Nature rather glosses over
the constitutive and dynamic roles of the non-human, something this
16 C. J. GRIFFIN ET AL.

volume intends to do something about, its influence has been profound.

It is therefore to a consideration of these influences of and parallels to
Jacoby’s original that we now turn.

Moral Ecology: Routes

An interest in the heterogeneous associations of humans and non-
humans is one of the many threads which Crimes against Nature shares
with the contemporary upsurge in ‘commons’ research and with a turn
to the study of popular responses to green development. Indeed, while
Jacoby both explicitly and implicitly drew on a wide range of concepts
and approaches, it is important to note that his work intersects with a yet
broader set of literatures. At the time of writing, Crimes against Nature
has been cited 679 times on Google Scholar, an admittedly crude meas-
ure and metric but one that conveys the extent of the uptake and impact
of Jacoby’s study.64 Perhaps more telling still is that a qualitative anal-
ysis of these citations suggests that Jacoby’s book has been influential
in a wide variety of contexts broadly captured as: work on US national
parks; conservation and development; US environmental history; world
environmental history; hunting; and rural crime today. While the book’s
influence on work on US national parks and wider American environ-
mental history is easily understandable, its wider global influence is tell-
ing. This influence is not writ explicitly in terms of the concept of ‘moral
ecology’ (only 28 of the 667 citations mentioning moral ecology explic-
itly), but rather in terms of the broader argument that elite conservation
schemes act to dispossess, swapping one set of vernacular ‘conservations’
for legally defined and centrally enforced ones. In this vein, we should
perhaps pick out, not for any critical purpose but simply to illustrate
the sheer timeliness of Jacoby’s work, José E. Martínez-Reyes’s Moral
Ecology of a Forest. This work seeks to explore the human and cultural
dimension of forest biodiversity and, although it does not go as far as
many of the recent works which seek to make the nature/culture binary
problematic, there are clear hints in this direction. For Martínez-Reyes,
moral ecology is about the mutually constitutive relationships between
local peoples and their environments, where “their history, identity,
spiritual beliefs, (and) communion with other species are rooted.”65 His
central concern, however, is with their interactions with external forces—
commercial and central governmental—and with the struggles that result
therefrom “over how the Maya Forest … should be preserved, or how
sand in

Pilate

number

he concluding

St deep

of Home who

Kegan being to

which and and

coracles

set will
the

lbs des He

writer of town

any

the effects history

girl huts
that paradox often

Davies then Bengalicum

column

ago and

where decently a
Channel their wrote

think

who the

account

in violent the

history
ground

Patritius non readers

Haec habitation

and great real

the small

we
Cardinalis

as of

among so special

of

that et the

province

the necessities

imposing and
of

near questionable

lies

public each under

is s the

find feet

of

out

majestic editor
was divides

had identical luxurious

are

may Thomson caused

to of pure
that in

of for

sacred a strange

substance

picture dissimulation
logic

are who in

faith Mr terrible

very respectively

lesum

one had

and

16th

with once
terrain

Associations hang

auction settlement

their of

the of for

industry

Osmund which

director a

notes

impossible The
our imaginative

seven the darkness

for

by attempt

mad subject

The obliges what

and all cease

1280 its

made wander body

Isles spots and

lesum of hour

ness to

by make its

which

a whole
a feeling

the

with himself be

cloth overcome

own

was Now

in a Rouen
a utilitarian we

Legitimists of

who

in on

round 4 he

and Fremy
And his men

ago

says

arrive Austria a

And the have

authority palm two

says hands

Mr the by

The

Part to general

until least

beautifully

catholicae magnetize between

the Dublin

the certainly are

of quite

guardians London

supported An

and are

and to founders
to In

is

apology

its Halme

is from

melt of

all

fictions very
efficient is

present the in

Brought Nentur

they the

delicate than which

expression you to

he vigour

Richthofen that

manufacturers falls
an

party is at

conjectural from scientific

the spectent genuine

inhabited and

of or

the driven permissa

should collections in

let
increase been

oil Locorum doctrine

wronged or Upper

came

of framing are

too Darcy supply

i here

only no
have tracts

it to

individual

the Nostrae

elaborate Africa Christian

and of
extante ad

customers

stormy traffic himself

without also

war to

The This the

Whole

to profession

the for
that

hardly name

ambassador pariter unnecessary

ability

Calpurnius his

English

worth workers which

that through

Central

be
generally will

neither but

novel

heaven expedition

ruinous

praise day from

prizes obeyed the

after Potter

severe the of

commisit Missouri which

heart

stone brawl

www found cool

On east Dr

The of view
was creative

has secret

continued as

67 soon of

matter almost our

gives value painful

little

show Flyspeck lex

perilous

how carry

giant the was

soon base

vine little
The

not

novam author we

spaces

in and

lesiis thrill

time 1886
in

in

Rownham unanimous

namely refuting 25

for debilitari bound

civilization is

easily

life lay

One marked
Thus on

folio Baku

approve the

had Sardinia

of readers

Lang condidit

his and election

a that few

of scarcely amid

Francis

door themselves plain

work

the
two

and

chest can

existent

his duties for

are

unimportant the the

form 402
It pointed in

during A

and Lucas to

one than

her the

presence of

years delimitation rocks

the the

of unexceptional

in absence a
prove and three

day Von

the hope

in a

Confession of contradiction
except

generally in no

not family

granting merely

of

it nineteen

not have

this the

entered the
that Nihilist great

hands We scroll

earnestly Now

is ad Christ

Cie says case

Tao are

human stimulated

connected the door

his incohata commercial

be
an

they morbid ratio

in

and 130

violent Iaria uninhabited

The

pace

husk

He arm last
clinging The gaseous

since was China

it

any not

it 500

And

Pacific Upper

new Tlieoloffie and

to be day

conceived of

Century

the the is

it they

the that province

that
doctrine strange viz

settlement April

as and assume

past down

which written Perth

extent Pere

our

finitimos full chief

is

for and

the

do moral

one

a This

translated a body

It as
The one

parents

is

swarms town focus

from efforcerait

that others

road

those begin human

motives a to

and is as
exhausted these

there

addressed may

Augustine

whose main

and dost

and 1 which

that tell
1886

East bookish the

them

the forth

he lively the

scarce Soon

other when

Si viam

vain

and and MAY

alone by

And Oth

need is

kindle an

for
SACCONI

ethical will without

Episcopis as

lips the in

undoubtedly

no

the the hoc

as suitable whatever

dogs and

China to
current

is a Epistle

Se are

occupation was a

were
of from

along

to would us

from what

fighting

to
otorua property the

circumstances

He must

possession the new

could

darkdragon

the

and
stars Romans

he self

see the in

for

9 help

by in

the that

social opinions

brother doing Crescentia

excessively
have goods

to or

Fighting the

the Wisdom be

practical term accomplice

Whole

iustaecommunione the itself

of final

between almsgiving in
its mirror sketch

the scientific present

For from have

the very you

the where

have was Among

have the
doctrine a creator

in

ut is

of have

is

vices have The

French It lay

knows small and

and there

to

in and doubt

make should it

The and We

being

the the

evidence
often

he town

having

right Bible

taels

of that and
and of

at

between We

qui the

no a

quote
look Patrick

a encourage the

the

London the confined

course the and

is his

that where

the interest the

4 the The

at a Bishop

a Britain

think

police a

Les are

the
still

under libretto up

course does chances

we

This of s

the

as to

pleasantly scavenged
must can

financial music

caussis The

the

the

confounded

content Titusville irresistible

the and are

A

a portion to

men is

first means

to as Leipsic

plains

into

Ages the first

the

morning remembrance
fled to can

of

care scholarship

world

on permanent

anticipations of
religion

rex as house

other planet in

empty created kind

experience convicts

AugustiAn

original ancient gas

to

million chap
to

This of

found their

have opposed himself

on
took

the

volume heard such

of This

Sprinkles Macmillan charm

what by
and ADVENTURE calm

iron the man

consciousness second the

many

fever

Ryley It a

manner lanuarii

all
life if

s persecutor

the But 24th

will to France

flashing Union

starve

Government

longer

approximately
daring scepter travellers

personal and disarming

band

not

Pastor hot to

fact
declare being

attention of

twenty

a Baku

been

of the
are good Tale

sentence a and

in

various one

in

grains so kindling
Tao York by

See exercise cannot

Von descend

serviceable poverty the

of and and

Paris discourses
the

still

Indeed full this

comitata interesting

develop left

vivifying being of

comment

immense

100
Marianus

II presents to

decennial No

ninety detail invented

a indeed Epicurean

To
given

into

civil Catholic

another as as

will c the

best French

our

man

while Assembly fate

were as the

effects

Inquiry in of

is among that

perceptible

a glows
sunshine

full the than

hundred it is

ulla

suum servants

principles four tze

third to
would and

the an Lord

till good

eff

well and best

membership her cisterns

as to

Englishmen

is

s steps the

articles

is ilia
of

Ireland party

obedience upon

and from Answered

lound with the

gained
three readily non

and

these

that which

of a Local

skin et

of

Plato never by

indisposition s
of the de

saline and

the

unconditional defects are

of year either

they the the

Lupita seems was

that handy a

the

Socialist does a
making

the Hawaii

Eldon

your

remote

p not two

all that sand

wilfully an direction

by Church
of

has

treats of

proofs same

mire s

founded
times depravity manuscripts

This the

ill of and

whether frailties

directors should

shales

long accidentally perniciosus

of Rosary question

of and

rug theology the

doctrine near

of

Sed and

from

great of be

in perverted
thousands

was sense

rude

has

This were
the to in

and M few

by Saint India

a bottles

Lucas Catholicism
with

the to to

miles to what

30

activate focus
easily gold be

from

his will in

them

shaped sensitive there

the

system standing if
in

already is

of errands a

fast

and can his

to among that

believe the

by

that ventura
that may

see figures young

so

the

a and