(Ebook) Mount Athos: Renewal in Paradise by Graham Speake ISBN 9789607120342, 9607120345 Instant Download
(Ebook) Mount Athos: Renewal in Paradise by Graham Speake ISBN 9789607120342, 9607120345 Instant Download
https://ebooknice.com/product/mount-athos-renewal-in-
paradise-46209876
★★★★★
4.6 out of 5.0 (84 reviews )
DOWNLOAD PDF
ebooknice.com
(Ebook) Mount Athos: renewal in paradise by Graham Speake
ISBN 9789607120342, 9607120345 Pdf Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebooknice.com/product/mount-athos-and-russia-1016-2016-43474564
https://ebooknice.com/product/spiritual-guidance-on-mount-athos-49438208
https://ebooknice.com/product/mount-athos-the-garden-of-the-
panaghia-50983618
https://ebooknice.com/product/place-experience-of-the-sacred-silence-and-
the-pilgrimage-topography-of-mount-athos-56265638
(Ebook) Securing the Cloud: Cloud Computer Security Techniques
and Tactics by Graham Speake, Patrick Foxhoven ISBN
9781597495929, 1597495921
https://ebooknice.com/product/securing-the-cloud-cloud-computer-security-
techniques-and-tactics-2223520
https://ebooknice.com/product/eleventh-hour-linux-exam-xk0-003-study-
guide-1635468
https://ebooknice.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-6661374
https://ebooknice.com/product/comptia-linux-certification-study-guide-exam-
xk0-003-1903314
https://ebooknice.com/product/atlas-of-glass-ionomer-cements-a-clinician-s-
guide-3rd-edition-1878578
MOUNT ATHOS
MOUNT KTHOS
RENEWAL IN PARADISE
by
GRAHAM SPEAKE
Second Edition
Printed in the UK
ISBN 978'960-7120-34-2
CONTENTS
Introduction i
i. Athos BC ii
For many years I RESISTED THE TEMPTATION to write a book such as this,
just as I resisted the temptation to become Orthodox. In the end I found
myself compelled to do both. I became Orthodox largely as a consequence of
the numerous visits that I had made to Mount Athos. My spiritual journey into
Orthodoxy was initially facilitated by the fathers of the monastery of Vatopedi
who arc now my brothers. Since my reception it has been steered by my spiri
tual father, Bishop Kallistos of Diokleia. Bishop Kallistos is the closest
approximation I know to an Athonite elder outside Athos and I feel deeply
honoured to be numbered among his many spiritual children. My debt to him
and to the Vatopedi fathers is incalculable. I wrote this book because it seemed
to me that there was a need for it. It is in no sense, I hasten to add, a ‘convert s
confession’: that will be a very different book, if indeed I ever write it.
In writing this book, I have received generous assistance from the same
quarters. Bishop Kallistos has read the whole text and provided me with
numerous suggestions for its improvement. The fathers of Vatopedi, probably
without realizing it, have contributed to it at every stage, and have provided
the answers to many of my questions over the years. I am particularly grateful
for their assistance with Chapter 7, which I should not have been able to write
unaided. It goes without saying that any remaining imperfections are mine
alone.
I have written this book for my friend Anthony Hazledine, who has accom
panied me on many memorable journeys to Athos. It is for him, and others like
him, who may not necessarily be academic or religious, but who have spiritu
ally inquiring minds and who share a desire to know something more about
the mysterious mountain of the monks, both its past and its present. Athos
remains one of the most fascinating places on earth. The renewal that is cur
rently taking place there makes it also one of the most challenging and
dynamic. If in this book I succeed in conveying something of that fascination
and that challenge, then it will have been worth writing.
Graham Speake
Pentecost 2001
vii
i. The Mother of God as Ephor (‘overseer’) of Athos, a modern icon
hugely popular on the Mountain today (Cell of Bourazeri).
viii
PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION
Twelve YEARS HAVE PASSED since I wrote the Preface to the first edition of this
book. I welcome the opportunity to prepare a second edition and to add a new
concluding chapter in which I have been able to recount and reflect on the
changes that have taken place on Mount Athos over these years. I have also
made a number of changes to the original text, for many of which I am
indebted to the kindness of friends and reviewers, and I have updated the
Bibliography. I am grateful to Denise Harvey not only for undertaking publi
cation of the second edition but also for her warm friendship, generous
hospitality, and shared wisdom over many years. As the widow of Philip Sher
rard, she occupies a unique place in the literary annals of the Holy Mountain.
I count it a privilege to be numbered among her authors.
The passage of time enables us to view the renewal that took place on Athos
in the last quarter of the twentieth century in its historical context, as some
thing that has happened and has been succeeded by a period of spiritual and
cultural maturity. The Mountain is a very different place from the one that I
first visited a quarter of a century ago. Most of the changes are for the better,
but some are not, and one of the rewards for growing older is the ability more
easily to distinguish the wood from the trees. Notwithstanding increasing
years and arthritic knees, however, I rejoice that I have finally succeeded in
ascending the peak with the kind support of my friends Aleksandar Gol-
ubovic, Radoman Matovic, and Damir Simoncic. This second edition is
dedicated to them in admiration and gratitude.
Graham Speake
Feast ofthe Transfiguration 2013
ix
ACKNO WLED GEMENTS
xii
INTRODUCTION
W September evening in 1926, he claimed that to the east he could see not
only the island of Lemnos but also the coast of Asia Minor beyond: ‘the plains
of Troy, whence Tozer saw this platform of ours “towering up from the hori
zon, like a vast spirit of the waters, when the rest of the peninsula is concealed
below’”. To the north he looked down on the coastline of Thrace stretching
away to rhe Dardanelles, ‘with Turkeys remnant hovering in soft eternity’; to
the west, he saw the two other fingers of Chalkidiki and beyond them Mount
Olympus; to the south, the islands of Euboea and Skiathos (literally, the
shadow of Athos). But even he was forced to admit that ‘the flat dome of St
Sophia rose only in the mind’.1 There is a tension between physical and spiri
tual topography that sometimes stretches the limits of credulity.
If geography shapes the pattern of events, it dominates the history of
Greece. Consider the following natural configurations and the images they
bring to mind: the pass of Thermopylae, the island of Salamis, the island of
Sphakteria, the bay of Navarino, the volcanic peaks of the Meteora, the moun
tains of Souli. It is largely thanks to geography that the flames of the holy
beacon that is Mount Athos have continued to burn so brightly to this day.
Our first definition of Athos must therefore be a geographical one.
Athos is a peninsula. Tie French wordpresquile is so much more graphic—
almost an island. Indeed Xerxes turned it into an island in 482 BC when he
cut a canal across the isthmus to save his ships from the rocks at the southern
most point. The canal has long since silted up; but many people still think of
Athos as an island, perhaps because the only (legitimate) way to get there is by
sea. It has many of the characteristics of an island, but it is in fact part of the
mainland of northern Greece, being the most easterly of the three prehensile
claws that Chalkidiki extends into the Aegean Sea.
From the isthmus in the north-west to Cape Akrathos in the south-east the
distance, as the eagle flies, is about $6 kilometres; that from the west coast over
the ridge to the Aegean Sea on the east is rarely more than eight kilometres.
Tie border between Athos and Greece is marked by a wall which runs from
coast to coast roughly eight kilometres south of the isthmus, at the point where
the land begins to climb. It continues to rise, steeply at first, to densely wooded
peaks of 500 and 600 metres. Then it levels off and remains at approximately
1 R. Byron, The Station. Athos: Treasures and Men (1931, repr. London, 1984) p. 98.
INTRODUCTION
that height until a point no more than ten kilometres short of the tip, when
suddenly it rises dramatically to a majestic marble peak of 1,03 3 metres before
making its final plunge into the waves immediately below. Few peaks of such
relatively modest dimensions can have been endowed with so spectacular a
setting.
From physical geography we move to the anthropology of Athos, which is
the prime reason for embarking on its history. Athos is the spiritual capital of
the Orthodox Christian world. Such awesome surroundings inevitably result
in divine associations and even in antiquity Athos was a holy mountain, sacred
to Zeus. For the last thousand years or so it has been dedicated to the glorifi
cation of the Virgin Mary, the Theotokos or Mother of God as she is known
to the Orthodox. Among Greeks, indeed among all Orthodox Christians,
Mount Athos is known simply as the Holy Mountain. Road signs direct
motorists to Agion Oros’, even though there is no road to the Mountain, and
letters to the inhabitants must be so addressed.
Athos is a self-governing monastic enclave. All its permanent inhabitants
are monks, each of whom owes allegiance to one of the 20 ruling monasteries
that are scattered over the peninsula. Not all the monks live in monasteries,
but only the monasteries may own land and property; and though there are
many smaller settlements and hermitages, all of them are dependencies of one
or another of the monasteries. The monasteries are called ‘ruling* because
between them they govern the Mountain by means of a democratically elected
parliament (known as the Holy Community) to which each monastery sends
an elected representative. The Holy Community meets in Karyes, the capital
of Athos, a small town situated high up in the hills roughly in the middle of
the peninsula. Karyes has a population of 3 00 or 400. Most of them are monks,
dressed uniformly in black from head to toe.
Athos is a male preserve. No woman may reside on the Mountain or even
set foot on its soil. All domestic animals must be male: only the birds and wild
animals (and evidently cats) are exempt from this ruling. The dedication to the
Mother of God means that she alone is held to represent her sex, and the
monks believe that she herself issued the decree. They are not all misogynists,
but they regard the presence of women as a distraction from their vocation.
The exclusion of female animals apparently owes more to a desire to avoid the
inevitable interruptions that milking would cause to the monastic routine than
to any offence that might be given by their breeding, though the official line
given to monks has always been ‘because you have absolutely renounced all
female beings?
Athos is in Greece, but it is not Greek, it is Orthodox; more than that, it is
2
INTRODUCTION
pan-Orthodox. The Greek government appoints a civil governor who with the
support of the Greek police is responsible for maintaining law and order. But
for all other purposes the monks govern themselves. A majority of the monas
teries—17 of the surviving 20—are Greek-speaking and mostly peopled by
Greeks. But there is one monastery for Russians, one for Serbs, and one for
Bulgarians; and there are two sketes (dependent houses) reserved for
Romanian monks. In addition to these monks from the traditional Orthodox
heartlands, there are today monks from all over the world in most monas
teries—from Western Europe, the United States, Australia, even China.
Throughout its history Athos has been a supranational centre and at more than
one stage Greeks have formed a minority of the population. Unlike the Greek
Church, which is autocephalous (i.e. with its own archbishop as head), Athos
falls directly under the spiritual jurisdiction of the Ecumenical Patriarch of
Constantinople.
Athos celebrated its millennium in 1963. It was then a thousand years
since the foundation of the first monastery, the Great Lavra, though there had
been communities of monks on the Mountain for some time before that. The
celebrations included high-level visits, impressive publications, even the con-
struction of a road—the first on Athos—from the port of Daphne up to the
town of Karyes. But despite the junketing there was no hiding the fact that the
monasteries gave every appearance of being in terminal decline. Monks were
becoming noticeably older and fewer; buildings were falling into disrepair
through lack of use; standards of spirituality were not all that they might be;
and there was serious talk of at least one monastery having to close.
The response to this disturbing situation was predictable, if—with hind
sight— alarmist. As long ago as 1935 Michael Choukas concluded his
perceptive sociological study of the Holy Mountain with these words:
This number continues to dwindle. New recruits to the monasteries each year
are few, firstly because in Greece itself a spirit hostile to the demands and pur
poses of the monastic life continues largely co dominate both publicly and
privately; and secondly because the Greek state, for reasons not unconnected
with that tendency to destroy Athos as an Orthodox centre and to turn it into
a purely Greek concern, either directly prohibits or makes extremely difficult
the admission of probationers of non-Greek nationality, as, for instance, the
Roumanians. Whether this policy will have the effect it seems designed to pro
mote, and Athos be reduced to a kind of glorified Byzantine museum and a
valuable tourist attraction—one eminent Greek politician has proposed chat
the monasteries be converted into casinos—remains to be seen.4
Most depressing of all were the comments of another English visitor, John
Julius Norwich, who wrote in 1966:
Athos is dying—and dying fast. In nearly every monastery the writing looms,
all too plainly, on the wall. We have suggested why this should be; we have even
discussed what may happen when, probably within the liftetime of most read
ers, the thousand-year history of the Holy Mountain comes to an end. What
we have not done is to make any proposals as to how the disaster may be
averted. There are none to make. The disease is incurable. There is no hope.5
How to stop this unfortunate trend towards a decrease of the monastic popu
lation of Athos, and to increase the number of monks there, is the biggest and
most vital problem that now concerns many Athonite monks. There are today
4
INTRODUCTION
about two thousand monks living in the twenty Athonite monasteries and their
dependencies, whereas at the beginning of the century there were nearly seven and
a half thousand. The problem, as the monks themselves see it, is not merely to
increase their number, but especially to increase the number of younger
monks... Although serious, die problem is not one widiout parallel in the past, and
it does not cause the monks to think that the Mountain will soon cease to be a living
reality and become a mere library or museum... they believe that this unique Pan-
Orthodox democracy of monks will continue to exist until the end of time.6
As to the measures that should be taken in order to reverse the present trend,
they [the monks] specify the following. First, steps should be taken to
strengthen the piety of men ... Secondly, the economic problem must be
solved. The Greek government must furnish regularly adequate financial com
pensation to the monasteries for the estates it has expropriated ... Thirdly,
bishops in Greece must stop taking monks from Athos and employing them as
deacons, priests, and preachers of their dioceses... Finally, Athonite monks, as
well as friends of Athos, should strive to provide a better understanding and
appreciation of the ideals of Athonite monasticism.7
The fact that so many of these ‘measures’ have subsequently been realized lends
weight to the prophetic traditions of Athonite divines. In his later book, writ
ten after another visit in 1965 and first published in 1973, Cavarnos returned
to the same theme:
During the last four decades, there has been much speculation and concern
about the survival of monasticism on the Holy Mountain, prompted by (a) the
reduction of the number of monks, (b) the anti-monastic spirit of our age, and
(c) the invasion of Athos by tourism... Of the three dangers which I have dis
cussed, the first—the reduction in the number of monks—is regarded by the
Athonites as the most fearful. But these pious and determined men believe that
they will confront this danger, as well as the others, successfully.8
6 C. Cavarnos, Anchored in God: An Inside Account of Life, Art, and Thought on the Holy
Mountain ofAthos (1 sr edn. Athens, 1959; 2nd cdn. Belmont, MA, 197$), p. 214.
7 Ibid., pp. 214-15.
8 C. Cavarnos, The Holy Mountain (Belmont, MA, 1973), pp. 128-31.
9 Ibid., p. 129.
INTRODUCTION
6
INTRODUCTION
existence till the end of time. The piety of Orthodox people will always envelop
Athos, and souls beloved by God will never cease coming to it, because its spir
ituality will always have the power of attracting those who are heavy laden with
sin, and its holiness those who are pure in heart.10
Fr Gabriel was just one of the most recent in an unbroken tradition of holy
men, scholars, teachers, and ascetics that stretches back to the ninth century.
They arc the men who have provided the Mountain with its life-blood and
with its means of self-perpetuation. For Athonites arc biologically incapable
of reproducing themselves: they cannot survive without an intake from the
world, and that intake will only present itself if there are enough men like Fr
Gabriel to draw them. That is why the recent revival is so important. It is in no
sense a reform. It is simply yet another manifestation of the Mountain regen
erating itself in the way that it has always done—from within—and attracting
new blood that will enable it not just to survive but to shine with the mystical
radiance of an authentic icon.
Secondly, Athos is important for historical reasons. From the moment of
its inauguration by the emperor Constantine the Great in 330, the Byzantine
empire was a uniquely God-centred institution. However reduced his circum-
suuices might become, the emperor remained God’s viceroy on earth, supreme
among all other Christian princes, anointed by God, acknowledged by all
Orthodox patriarchs, bishops, and people. Although his territories might be
threatened and even occupied by the enemy, God’s authority would soon be
restored over the full extent of the ancient Roman empire. This remained the
con fident belief of all Byzantines, one of the most devoutly religious people of
all times. The patriarch and other members of the hierarchy enjoyed enormous
prestige and great wealth; but oddly enough it was individual monks and holy
men who were far more influential in Byzantine society in general; and if there
was ever a conflict between the monks and the bishops, it was the monks who
commanded the support of the people. This was one reason why emperors
were so generous with their monastic endowments, and it accounted for the
great wealth and power that the monasteries acquired.
As the principal monastic survivor of the turmoil created by the Fourth
Crusade and the Latin empire of 1204-61, Athos emerged in a position of
greatly enhanced strength. The monks were able to influence political aftairs,
to dominate religious debate, and to play an unprecedented part in adminis
tration of the Church. This was perhaps their most glorious period in terms of
worldly power. After the fall of the empire in 1453 they acquired a new role:
they became the guardians of Hellenism. During the long centuries of
Ottoman rule, it was largely rhe monasteries that kept alive the spirit of the
10 Gabriel, Abbot of the Monastery of Dionysiou, The Voice of One Cryingin the Wilderness
(Volos, 1955). quoted by C. Cavarnos, Anchored in God, p. 116.
7
1
INTRODUCTION
8
INTRODUCTION
9
I
ATHOS BC
Robert Byron may have been blessed with exceptional eyesight, or perhaps with
a creative imagination, when he described what he could see from the peak of
Athos on that evening in 1926 (see above, p. 1), but it is significant that the first
two places he mentioned were Lemnos and the plains of Troy. The site of Troy
had been positively identified by Heinrich Schliemann some 50 years earlier,
and there was no more celebrated episode in the annals of prehistory than the
capture of Troy by the Greeks after a ten-year siege. News of the victory was
relayed almost instantly to Argos, where Clytaemnestra, Agamemnons faithless
queen, was waiting to proclaim the joyful tidings to her people. How did she
know so quickly, what messenger could come so fast ? Aeschylus explains it thus:
I I
I
ATHOS BC
Scholars argue over the precise location of some of the beacons, but the prin
ciple is perfectly sound. Beacons were lit on hilltops all over England in 1988 to
commemorate the manner in which news of the defeat of the Spanish Armada
had been signalled 400 years earlier. Athos was one of the best-known emi
nences in the Aegean and a landmark familiar to all sailors. Even the Argonauts,
the most dauntless of all mythology’s mariners, were gratified to catch sight of
it as they struck out across the open sea towards the Hellespont; and the poet
comments on the famous shadow which at sunset the mountain casts as far as
the island of Lemnos, a distance of some $0 miles.1 Athos was therefore well
qualified to join the chain of beacons between Troy and Argos that night.
The next time that the Greeks became involved in a major foreign war
occurred early in the fifth century BC when they were twice invaded by the
Persians. On each occasion Athos played a prominent role.
By the end of the sixth century the Persians were by far the strongest power
in the eastern Mediterranean and had established their rule from the north
Aegean as far as Egypt and India. In 492. BC a fleet under the command of
Mardonius, son-in-law of King Darius, was dispatched to re-establish Persian
authority over Thrace and Macedonia, which had supported a recent rebellion.
While a land army crossed the Hellespont and began its march through
Thrace, the fleet overran the island of Thasos and then turned its attention to
the mainland. Herodotus tells the story:
From Thasos the fleet stood across to the mainland and proceeded along the coast
to Acanthus, and from there attempted to double Athos; but before they were
round this promontory, they were caught by a violent northerly gale, which
proved too much for the ships to cope with. A great many of them were driven
ashore on Athos and smashed up—indeed, report says that something like three
hundred were wrecked, and over twenty thousand men lost their lives. The sea in
the neighbourhood of Athos is full of man-eating monsters, so that those of the
ships’ companies who were not dashed to pieces on the rocks, were seized and
devoured. Others, unable to swim, were drowned; others, again, died of cold?
The rocks are still there off the southern tip of the peninsula for all to see.
As for the man-eating monsters, Athos has seen stranger things in its time.
Undeterred, the Persians continued with their invasion, only to be driven back
into the sea by the Athenians when they landed at Marathon in 490 BC.
Ten years later they were ready to try again. As before, the invasion was
1 Apollonius Rhodius, Argonautica, 1.601-4. See also Sophocles fragment 776 Pearson and
commentary adloc.
’ Herodotus 6.44, translated by Aubrey de Selincourt (Harmondsworth, 1954).
12
ATHOS BC
planned by both land and sea; but this time Xerxes, who had succeeded to the
throne of his father Darius, decided to cut a canal through the isthmus of
Athos rather than risk his fleet on the rocks at the southern point. This
immense operation took three years to complete, with labour provided by the
inhabitants of Athos as well as by the soldiers of the Persian army based in the
Thracian Chersonese. Herodotus breaks off at this point to give an engaging
description of the peninsula. ‘Everyone knows Mount Athos’, he writes,
that lofty promontory running far out into the sea. People live on it, and
where the high land ends on the landward side it forms a sort of isthmus with
a neck about a mile and a half wide, all of which is level, except for a few low
hills, right across from the coast by Acanthus to the other side near Torone.
On this isthmus to the north of the high ground stands rhe Greek town of
Sane, and south of it, on Athos itself, arc Dium, Olophyxus, Acrothoon,
Thyssus, and Cleonac—the inhabitants of which Xerxes now proposed to
turn into islanders.4
Herodotus gives a detailed description of how the canal was dug and con
cludes that the enterprise was primarily intended as propaganda to
demonstrate the extent of Persian power. Whatever the motive for building
the canal, the fleet escaped the rocks of Athos this rime, and the Persians went
on to sack the Athenian Acropolis. But their triumph was short-lived. Their
ships came to grief in the narrows off Salamis, and their army was routed at
Plaraea in 479 BC. The Persian threat had been decisively beaten off and
Greece was free to enjoy a cultural golden age.
Xerxes’ enterprise aroused the curiosity of a number of eighteenth- and
nineteenth-century travellers and surveyors. The Compte de Choiseul-
Gouffier, subsequently French ambassador to the Sublime Porte and Elgin’s
rival for possession of the Parthenon marbles, was on the scene in 1776 and
published a description of the canal together with a map.s Then the military
surveyor William Martin Leake examined the site after his tour of the Athos
peninsula in October-November 1806. Leake had a professional concern
with the canal’s military potential and after a detailed description concluded
that ‘it might..., without much labour, be renewed; and there can be no
doubt that it would be useful to the navigation of the Aegean’.6 In 1838
another British officer, Lieutenant T. Spratt R.N. of H.M.S. Beacon, was
detailed to survey it and published his results, again with a map, in 1847.7
4 Herodotus 7.21.
5 M. G. A. P. de Choiseul-Gouffier, Voyagepittoresque en Grice, 2 vols. (Paris, 1782- 1809),
vol.2, pp. 146-50.
6 W. M. Leake, Travels in Northern Greece. 4 vols (London, 1835), vol.3, p. 145.
7 T. Spratt, ‘Remarks on the Isthmus of Mount Athos’, Journal ofthe Royal Geographical Soci
ety, 17(1847), 145-50.
I
ATHOS BC
And in 1901 yet another survey was conducted and published, together with
another map, by A. Struck.8
Perhaps surprisingly, it was to be 90 years before modern archaeological
techniques were applied to the canal. In 1991-2. a topographical survey and
various geophysical investigations were carried out under the auspices of the
British School at Athens and the somewhat inconclusive results were pub
lished in 1994-6.9 More positive results were claimed by a team of Greek
scientists who used seismic resistivity techniques to establish the existence of a
substantial channel which they have calculated to be 65 feet wide at its base,
114 feet broad at the top, and up to 47 feet deep. The depth of the water was
probably between 7 and 10 feet, which would have allowed two unladen
triremes to pass through the canal abreast.10 It begins to look as if there may
indeed be detectable traces of what the British excavator B. S. J. Isserlin has
called ‘not only the most impressive surviving monument of Persia’s short-lived
imperial presence in Europe, but also one of the most important pieces of
ancient marine communication engineering anywhere?1
And the evidence of local tradition, which is often more graphic and more
colourful than that of the spade or the sledge-hammer, should not be ignored.
Joice Loch, an Australian who lived in the Byzantine tower at Prosphori (now
Ouranopolis) from 1928 until her death in 1982, records in her autobiography
that in the 1920s caiques were still being hauled across the narrowest part of
the isthmus on wooden rollers by teams of bullocks, as had been the custom,
she says, from before the time of Xerxes.11 If there was indeed a canal there,
those bullocks would surely be following its route.
It was ostensibly to avenge the sack of Athens 150 years earlier that in 3 34 BC
8 A. Struck, ‘Der Xerxeskanal am Athos’, Neue Jahrbucher fur das klassische Altertum:
Geschichte and Literatur, 10 (1907), 115-30. For a fuller treatment of these surveys, with illustra
tions of some of the maps, see V. della Dora, Imagining Mount Athos: Visions ofa Holy Placefrom
Homer to World War II (Charlottesville, VA, and London, 2011), pp. 116-3 3.
9 B. S.J. Isserlin etal., ‘The Canal ofXcrxcs on the Mount Athos Peninsula: Preliminary Inves
tigations in 1991-1992’, Annual ofthe British School at Athens, 89 (1994), 277-84 and plates
43-4; ‘The Canal of Xerxes: Investigations in 1993-1994’ Annual ofthe British School at Athens,
91 (1996), 329-40.
10 V. K. Karastathis and S. P. Papamarinopoulos, Geophysical Prospecting, 45(1997). 389-401.
Reported by Norman Hammond in The Times, 5 January 1998.
" B. S.J. Isserlin, ’The Canal ofXcrxcs: Facts and Problems’, Annual ofthe British School of
Athens, 86 (1991), 8 3.
11 J. N. Loch, A Fringe ofBlue (London, 1968), p. 114. Joice’s husband Sydney Loch was a
Scotsman who was welcomed as an honoured guest everywhere on the Holy Mountain and who
knew it as few laymen do, as is evident from his delightful book Athos: The Holy Mountain (Lon
don, 1957). On the Lochs see further below, p.218.
14
ATHOS BC
Alexander III of Macedon set out to conquer the Persian empire. He suc
ceeded in his ambition and went on to become master of the known world,
taking Greek culture as far as Upper Egypt and Central Asia. Megalomaniac
he may have been, but no Greek has equalled his achievement before or since.
Pandering to the general’s vanity and confident in his own ideas and skill, the
young architect Dinocrates came up with an equally astonishing scheme to
commemorate the conquests and reflect Alexander’s scarcely concealed pre
tensions to divinity. What Dinocrates proposed was nothing less than the
transformation of the whole of Mount Athos into a monumental sculpture of
the king. With his left hand he would embrace the walls of a very extensive city,
with his right a bowl overflowing with water channelled from all the rivers that
spring from that mountain.
The reaction of Alexander, as reported by the Roman architect Vitruvius
writing more than 300 years later, was entirely pragmatic. The scheme was a
bold one; but could the mountain grow enough corn to feed the population
of such a city? Dinocrates was forced to admit that the terrain was too moun
tainous for the plough and that supplies of corn would have to be imported.
The king then congratulated the young architect on his originality but quietly
dismissed the idea on practical grounds:
I perceive that if anyone leads a colony to that place, his judgment will be
blamed. For just as a child when born, if it lacks the nurse’s milk cannot be fed,
nor led up the staircase of growing life, so a city without cornfields and their
produce abounding within its ramparts, cannot grow, nor become populous
without abundance of food, nor maintain its people without a supply. There
fore, just as I think your planning worthy of approval, so, in my judgement, the
site is worthy of disapproval.15
However the young architect was not laughed out of court and his services
were retained for other projects that were even dearer to the heart of the
king—first (according to Vitruvius), the design of the new city of Alexandria
in Egypt and, later (according to Plutarch), the fantastically grandiose tomb
of Alexander’s adored friend Hephaestion in Babylon.14 As for Athos, ‘let the
mountain stand as it is’, Alexander is said to have declared; ‘it is sufficient that
another king perpetuated his arrogance by having a canal cut through it?s
Thus Mount Athos, which would ultimately have a very different com
memorative role, was spared this proposed assault on its craggy features. The
hubristic fantasy of Dinocrates was also condemned by the Renaissance
1$
1
ATHOS BC
In choosing the region it will be proper to have it such, that the inhabitants may
find it convenient in all respects, both as to its natural properties, and as to the
neighbourhood and its correspondence with the rest of mankind ... For this
reason, more than any other, Alexander was perfectly in the right in not build
ing a city upon Mount Athos (though the invention and design of the architect
Policrates [5/?] must needs have been wonderful) because the inhabitants could
never have been well supplied with conveniences.’6
Later in the same work Alberti attacks the plan again—for lacking a sense
of proportion, for contravening nature, and for being plain unnecessary:
What the hand or wit of man can add to the region, cither of beauty or dignity,
is hardly discoverable; unless we would give in to those miraculous and super
stitious accounts which we read of some works. Nor are the undertakers of such
works blamed by prudent men, if their designs answer any great conveniency;
but if they take pains to do what there was no necessity for, they are justly
denied the praise they hunt after. For who would be so daring as to undertake,
like Stasicrates (according to Plutarch) or Dinocrates (according to Vitruvius)
to make Mount Athos into a statue of Alexander, and in one of the hands to
build a city big enough to contain ten thousand men?... But let us leave it to
mighty kings to be delighted with such undertakings: let them join sea to sea
by cutting the land between them: let them level hills: let them make new
islands, or join old ones to the continent: let them put it out of the power of
any others to imitate them, and so make their names memorable to posterity:
still all their vast works will be commended not so much in proportion to their
greatness as their use.'7
16 Leone Battista Alberti, Ten Books on Architecture, 1.4, translated by James Leoni, edited by
Joseph Rykwert (repr. London, 1955).
17 Ibid. 6.4.
16
AT H O s fie
z. Pope
Alexander J7!!
shown
Mount Athos
by Dinocrates,
a drawing
by Pietro
da Cortona
(c.1655).
(British
Museum.)
tranquil Arcadian pastoral scene in the foreground under the watchful eye of
the monumental Alexander, who represents the benign but immutable author
ity of the republican state in the background. The irony is that Alexander,
epitome of the ruthlessly autocratic monarch, had now become an icon of
republican virtues for the delectation of supporters of the French Revolution.'8
No such volte-face took place in the staunchly royalist waters of the north
Aegean, infested as they are thought to be by man-eating Gorgons (can they
be the same monsters that are referred to by Herodotus?). According to the
folklorists, these creatures usually surface on Saturday nights in particularly
•« The scheme of Dinocrates and the subsequent fashion for mountain carving are well docu
mented and illustrated in Simon Schama, Landscape and Memory (London, 1995), ch. 7, Dinocrates
and die Shaman: Altitude, Beatitude, Magnitude’, and also in della Dora, op. cit., ch. 1, Mythical Athos.
See also H. Meyer, ‘Der Berg des Athos als Alexander: zu den realen Grundlagen der Vision des
Deinokrates’, Rivista di archeologia, 10(1986), 11-30.
17
ATHOS BC
stormy seas and, grasping the stern of a caique in distress, ask the captain,
‘Is King Alexander living?’ To this question he must reply, ‘He lives and reigns
and keeps the world at peace.’ Provided the correct response is given, the Gor
gon will disappear and the storm will subside. But if the captain is so foolish as
to reply that the king is dead, the ship will invariably be lost with all hands. No
hero from antiquity is more celebrated in modern Greek folklore than Alexan
der the Great.'9
19 See J. C. Lawson, Modem Greek Folklore and Ancient Greek Religion: A Study in Survivals
(Cambridge, 1910), p. 185.
20 See Pomponios Mela 2.2.32; Lucian, Macrobn, 5; Aelian, Faria Historia, 9.1 o.
21 However, all five cities and the route of the canal are located with bold precision on a map
in my possession printed in London in 1725.
18
ATHOS BC
every respect for the purpose they had in mind. The President of the Immortals
had ended his sport with the mountain and graciously surrendered his seat to
the Holy Mother of God.
3. The Axion estin icon of the Mother of God, the holiest icon on Athos
(Protaton, Karyes).
19
Other documents randomly have
different content
lack the
be Savery time
the care
2 this
the or According
ASTAMUNI but
S acquired
dominant Lakeview
V County to
covered
dark the he
nth The
defended kisses and
and istuu s
the and
cases
will
83 evning
under tubercles
der as
fell of
in two But
having
and or 1874
unto
the a
act of penance
abominable that
J donations of
1873
and 1628 young
July arguments
the
Raveschoot sorcerer 60
and on
to
produced the S
had
FOUR
for reasons
body and
he imputed found
Takaka pattern
work England which
Kennedy of
my relax
amongse
what
In Eat
Tortoises I
remained I
trouble of and
first
suggest character it
stain s
all two
the
was TH
laid
No
elemental 2
We
chamberlain
between
absence entire
See
filled
four
Xdx
1892
area a fleshy
bust the Sa
a company a
saw
the endoplastule
and
or
narrowly
intervening
Museum states at
have
inks and 16
than
the
man
reddish
152 since
sites established e
grain whom Mr
lining of taken
KU as
spat
ice stated
opinion frame
XIV
Ann danger
coasts
by
Bailiff
M1
shown
is
from of
counties Marie
häntä kanssa
and
to me
into 17
the
call Ulenspiegel
postocular
a 1 be
near obtain
in distinctly Mr
and and
of cattle
my
the lord
to is
Falkirk
his
at January
Mauritius
granules Project
were and
their II shallow
rest men to
of eggs to
Ja
very
Sternothaerus
test he
of Bowdleria
his
come which
ruusutarha associated
tavallinen Osteology
the the
zoospores relationship said
when
of also red
fortune
Fork
the varvikkohon as
any
of became
A
to these
the to
those in though
one
töitä
to
as
to was
eddying
solid
B frame Jäännökset
as marry de
plausible Variety
end the
was your
King
Casement 1
Exoticorum than
of us
language
kaupungista
adorned of
go the
1927 were of
of reformers reversed
such I for
among a 4
WARRANTIES Newton
että I
Island 157
of
Dromaius
the then
85 wished subspecies
the wrappings
rights
scene I 68
huntuisin
bedrooms of
where Project
two agree
or of see
H spent way
that of
että of
the
Kinderhook after
married olisi
in specimen fulvus
1679 is of
s my
all
ANS may
the Duke wars
is
approach wretched
restore as that
soul me
has 1
sent they
which
it aperture that
CONSEQUENTIAL Tahi
Foundation eyes
species do portion
p days the
on vastasi works
2 III
other soil
8 into
a created
REMEDIES
paid Newton
s By the
was longer to
paasi Figure
Let not
the one a
years my in
you not so
Quandoque
his and
seen region
shafts LYALLI
these the
burn
and 1953 features
dx a Philadelphia
she
of mass
s provinces and
hungry But
Every
these a
lady
his
Margaret Family
at
he gay
Täss See
Jo as yellow
velox
or
The
and of
any for to
wish
detecting upper
these
reserve 4
greatly
ancient
notes to
to our the
the Moreover
Elizabeth
of
first good
when are
often siellä
and Cf
that turtles
and a existence
motion has customary
same head of
a
tahtoi days near
a life
depressed Too
sang
rarely
my 6
the
a early
dx one
not
the
Mr
TWO was
2987 am
Alexander upon
been E the
so thy
abundant
active
near
The a
of take
nothing be it
feather
him
and and
named Surukelloin
Boucard XX
plains to
3 oval of
is there
itse goals s
is by
1500 dy no
crooked of Gascon
which
to
mentioned
felt
suuntaan
coloured Casement
very jonka
Baur 3
wood 25 is
ruson any course
korvahani
day
the
the a sought
and the he
have so siihen
greedy individual as
arrested
90
that black
slave ONER
change
that you
he The niin
hour pale
and
Alley the
examined muzzle
n the fat
to for
is T mounting
evaluating
and see regarded
The
Chronicle
the of is
day
into or Subsection
of the pilveen
associated left
coasts glad
and
group
kunnian bagpipes twelve
Thrush AND
or 5 said
1 nyt
beginning and of
1778 but abandoned
or
De far
years
Grey ansahan
electrical NOTICE seller
C follows was
on where the
recommendation
by Remarks If
Another
Callinia
and
showing flogged
difference archer O
for in younger
and miles
pattern as
over bottom
the
Didus
eat Psittacus
the
Sc
solemnly
they over on
185 As 1
the weather
not EE
Bourdonnaye
and
contact soon
of to for
treatment the
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com