Basic Ideas and Concepts in Nuclear Physics An Introductory Approach 3rd Edition Kris Heyde PDF Download
Basic Ideas and Concepts in Nuclear Physics An Introductory Approach 3rd Edition Kris Heyde PDF Download
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
Basic Ideas and Concepts in Nuclear Physics An Introductory
Approach 3rd Edition Kris Heyde pdf download
Available Formats
https://ebookgate.com/product/introductory-nuclear-physics-2nd-
edition-samuel-s-m-wong/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/introductory-chemistry-an-active-
learning-approach-3rd-edition-mark-s-cracolice/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/introductory-chemistry-an-atoms-first-
approach-3rd-edition-julia-burdge-michelle-driessen/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/web-design-introductory-concepts-and-
techniques-3rd-edition-gary-b-shelly/
ebookgate.com
Modern Physics An Introductory Text 1st Edition Jeremy I.
Pfeffer
https://ebookgate.com/product/modern-physics-an-introductory-text-1st-
edition-jeremy-i-pfeffer/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/essentials-of-nuclear-medicine-physics-
and-instrumentation-3rd-edition-rachel-a-powsner/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-neutron-a-tool-and-an-object-in-
nuclear-and-particle-physics-1st-edition-hans-g-borner/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-continuum-a-constructive-approach-
to-basic-concepts-of-real-analysis-rudolf-taschner/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/nuclear-and-particle-physics-2nd-
edition-brian-martin/
ebookgate.com
SERIES IN FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED NUCLEAR PHYSICS
Series Editors
R R Betts and W Greiner
K Heyde
Department of Subatomic and Radiation Physics,
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
K Heyde has asserted his moral rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents
Act 1998 to be identified as the author of this work.
IOP Publishing Ltd and the author have attempted to trace the copyright holders of
all the material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright owners
if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained.
PART A
KNOWING THE NUCLEUS:
THE NUCLEAR CONSTITUENTS AND CHARACTERISTICS 1
1 Nuclear global properties 3
1.1 Introduction and outline 3
1.2 Nuclear mass table 3
1.3 Nuclear binding, nuclear masses 5
1.4 Nuclear extension: densities and radii 12
1.5 Angular momentum in the nucleus 15
1.6 Nuclear moments 17
1.6.1 Dipole magnetic moment 17
1.6.2 Electric moments—electric quadrupole moment 21
1.7 Hyperfine interactions 24
1.8 Nuclear reactions 30
1.8.1 Elementary kinematics and conservation laws 30
1.8.2 A tutorial in nuclear reaction theory 36
1.8.3 Types of nuclear reactions 40
Box 1a The heaviest artificial elements in nature: up to Z = 112 and beyond 48
Box 1b Electron scattering: nuclear form factors 51
Box 1c Proton and neutron charge distributions: status in 2004 55
Box 1d Observing the structure in the nucleon 57
Box 1e One-particle quadrupole moment 59
Box 1f An astrophysical application: alpha-capture reactions 64
PART B
NUCLEAR INTERACTIONS: STRONG, WEAK AND
ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCES 99
3 General methods 101
3.1 Time-dependent perturbation theory: a general method to study
interaction properties 101
3.2 Time-dependent perturbation theory: facing the dynamics of the
three basic interactions and phase space 103
4 Alpha-decay: the strong interaction at work 107
4.1 Kinematics of alpha-decay: alpha particle energy 107
4.2 Approximating the dynamics of the alpha-decay process 109
4.3 Virtual levels: a stationary approach to α-decay 111
4.4 Penetration through the Coulomb barrier 115
4.5 Alpha-spectroscopy 120
4.5.1 Branching ratios 120
4.5.2 Centrifugal barrier effects 121
4.5.3 Nuclear structure effects 123
4.6 Conclusion 124
Box 4a α-emission in 238
92 U146 125
Box 4b Alpha-particle formation in the nucleus: shell-model effects 127
5 Beta-decay: the weak interaction at work 131
5.1 The old beta-decay theory and the neutrino hypothesis 131
5.1.1 An historic introduction 131
5.1.2 Energy relations and Q-values in beta-decay 133
5.2 Dynamics in beta-decay 137
5.2.1 The weak interaction: a closer look 137
5.2.2 Time-dependent perturbation theory: the beta-decay
spectrum shape and lifetime 139
5.3 Classification in beta-decay 148
PART C
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE: AN INTRODUCTION 239
7 The liquid drop model approach: a semi-empirical method 241
7.1 Introduction 241
7.2 The semi-empirical mass formula: coupling the shell model and
the collective model 243
7.2.1 Volume, surface and Coulomb contributions 245
7.2.2 Shell model corrections: symmetry energy, pairing and
shell corrections 250
7.3 Nuclear stability: the mass surface and the line of stability 254
7.4 Two-neutron separation energies 259
Box 7a Neutron star stability: a bold extrapolation 264
Box 7b Beyond the neutron drip line 265
8 The simplest independent particle model: the Fermi-gas model 266
8.1 The degenerate fermion gas 266
8.2 The nuclear symmetry potential in the Fermi gas 269
8.3 Temperature T = 0 pressure: degenerate Fermi-gas stability 270
9 The nuclear shell model 275
9.1 Evidence for nuclear shell structure 275
9.2 The three-dimensional central Schrödinger equation 278
9.3 The square-well potential: the energy eigenvalue problem for
bound states 281
9.4 The harmonic oscillator potential 284
9.5 The spin–orbit coupling: describing real nuclei 287
9.6 Nuclear mean field: a short introduction to many-body physics in
the nucleus 291
9.6.1 Hartree–Fock: a tutorial 294
9.6.2 Measuring the nuclear density distributions: a test of
single-particle motion 297
9.7 Outlook: the computer versus the atomic nucleus 301
Box 9a Explaining the bound deuteron 305
Box 9b Origin of the nuclear shell model 309
Problem set—Part C 312
PART D
NUCLEAR STRUCTURE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS 319
10 The nuclear mean-field: single-particle excitations and global nuclear
properties 321
10.1 Hartree–Fock theory: a variational approach 321
10.2 Hartree–Fock ground-state properties 325
10.3 Test of single-particle motion in a mean field 329
Since the preface to the second edition was written, back in September 1998,
nuclear physics has been confronted with a large number of new and often ground-
breaking results all through the field of nuclear physics as discussed in the present
book. Therefore, but also because copies of the former edition were running out,
working on a new and fully updated edition became mandatory. Even though
the overall structure has not been changed, a number of the boxes have become
obsolete and have thus either been removed or modified in a serious way. The
number of highlights in the period 1999–2003 has been so large that a good
number of new boxes have been inserted, indicating the rapidly changing structure
of a lively field of physics. Of course, this has the drawback that a number of
topics do not always ‘age’ very well. In this sense, the new edition tries to convey
part of the dynamics in the field of nuclear structure, in particular over the period
between the appearance of the second edition and the time of writing this new
preface.
First of all, some new problems have been added to the existing list and I
am particularly grateful to E Jacobs, who has taught the course on Subatomic
Physics at the University of Gent in recent years, for supplying hints on these
extra exercises. They have served as examination questions over a number of
years and, are thus, well tested, feasible and form an essential part of the book in
order to acquire a good knowledge of the basic ideas and concepts.
In part A, most changes in the general text are not very extensive, except in
the chapter on β-decay and new results introduced by modifying boxes, deleting
some and introducing new ones. In chapter 1, a new box has been introduced with
the most recent results on electric charge and magnetic density distributions of
the proton and neutron and the box on super-heavy elements has, of course, been
updated. Box 1f has been deleted and the figures, related to the largest detectors
and accelerators, have likewise been updated. In chapter 2, on radioactivity, the
section on exotic decay modes has been updated and recent examples of proton
radioactivity have been included. It is in part B, in chapter 3 on β-decay that there
has been a substantial addition when discussing the role of the neutrino. Sections
on inverse β-decay and double β-decay have been updated. In the section on
Kris Heyde
CERN—February 2004
Gent—April 2004
The first edition of this textbook was used by a number of colleagues in their
introductory courses on nuclear physics and I received very valuable comments,
suggesting topics to be added and others to be deleted, pointing out errors to be
corrected and making various suggestions for improvement. I therefore decided
the time had come to work on a revised and updated edition.
In this new edition, the basic structure remains the same. Extensive
discussions of the various basic elements, essential to an intensive introductory
course on nuclear physics, are interspersed with the highlights of recent
developments in the very lively field of basic research in subatomic physics.
I have taken more care to accentuate the unity of this field: nuclear physics
is not an isolated subject but brings in a large number of elements from
different scientific domains, ranging from particle physics to astrophysics, from
fundamental quantum mechanics to technological developments.
The addition of a set of problems had been promised in the first edition and
a number of colleagues and students have asked for this over the past few years.
I apologize for the fact these have still been in Dutch until now. The problems
(collected after parts A, B and C) allow students to test themselves by solving
them as an integral part of mastering the text. Most of the problems have served
as examination questions during the time I have been teaching the course. The
problems have not proved to be intractable, as the students in Gent usually got
good scores.
In part A, most of the modifications in this edition are to the material
presented in the boxes. The heaviest element, artificially made in laboratory
conditions, is now Z = 112 and this has been modified accordingly. In part B,
in addition to a number of minor changes, the box on the 17 keV neutrino and its
possible existence has been removed now it has been discovered that this was an
experimental artefact. No major modifications have been made to part C.
Part D is the most extensively revised section. A number of recent
developments in nuclear physics have been incorporated, often in detail, enabling
me to retain the title ‘Recent Developments’.
In chapter 11, in the discussion on the nuclear shell model, a full section has
been added about the new approach to treating the nuclear many-body problem
using shell-model Monte Carlo methods.
Kris Heyde
September 1998
The present book project grew out of a course taught over the past 10 years at the
University of Gent aiming at introducing various concepts that appear in nuclear
physics. Over the years, the original text has evolved through many contacts with
the students who, by encouraging more and clearer discussions, have modified
the form and content in almost every chapter. I have been trying to bridge the
gap, by the addition of the various boxed items, between the main text of the
course and present-day work and research in nuclear physics. One of the aims
was also of emphasizing the various existing connections with other domains of
physics, in particular with the higher energy particle physics and astrophysics
fields. An actual problem set has not been incorporated as yet: the exams set over
many years form a good test and those for parts A, B and C can be obtained by
contacting the author directly.
I am most grateful to the series editors R Betts, W Greiner and W D Hamilton
for their time in reading through the manuscript and for their various suggestions
to improve the text. Also, the suggestion to extend the original scope of the
nuclear physics course by the addition of part D and thus to bring the major
concepts and basic ideas of nuclear physics in contact with present-day views
on how the nucleus can be described as an interacting many-nucleon system is
partly due to the series editors.
I am much indebted to my colleagues at the Institute of Nuclear Physics
and the Institute for Theoretical Physics at the University of Gent who have
contributed, maybe unintentionally, to the present text in an important way.
More specifically, I am indebted to the past and present nuclear theory group
members, in alphabetical order: C De Coster, J Jolie, L Machenil, J Moreau,
S Rombouts, J Ryckebusch, M Vanderhaeghen, V Van Der Sluys, P Van Isacker,
J Van Maldeghem, D Van Neck, H Vincx, M Waroquier and G Wenes in particular
relating to the various subjects of part D. I would also like to thank the many
experimentalist, both in Gent and elsewhere, who through informal discussions
have made many suggestions to relate the various concepts and ideas of nuclear
physics to the many observables that allow a detailed probing of the atomic
nucleus.
The author and Institute of Physics Publishing have attempted to trace
the copyright holders of all the figures, tables and articles reproduced in this
On first coming into contact with the basics of nuclear physics, it is a good idea
to obtain a feeling for the range of energies, densities, temperatures and forces
that are acting on the level of the atomic nucleus. In figure I.1, we introduce
an energy scale placing the nucleus relative to solid state chemistry scales, the
atomic energy scale and, higher in energy, the scale of masses for the elementary
particles. In the nucleus, the lower energy processes can come down to 1 keV,
the energy distance between certain excited states in odd-mass nuclei and x-ray or
electron conversion processes, and go up to 100 MeV, the energy needed to induce
collisions between heavy nuclei. In figure I.2 the density scale is shown. This
points towards the extreme density of atomic nuclei compared to more ordinary
objects such as most solid materials. Even densities in most celestial objects
(regular stars) are much lower. Only in certain types of stars—neutron stars that
can be compared to huge atomic nuclei (see chapter 7)—do analogous densities
show up. The forces at work and the different strength scales, as well as ranges
on which they act and the specific aspects in physics where they dominate, are
presented in figure I.3. It is clear that it is mainly the strong force between
nucleons or, at a deeper level, the strong force between the nucleon constituents
Figure I.1. Typical range of excitation energies spanning from the solid state phase
towards elementary particles. In addition, a few related temperatures are indicated.
Figure I.3. Schematic illustration of the very different distance scales over which the four
basic interactions act. A typical illustration for those four interactions is given at the same
time. Relative interaction strengths are also shown.
A
pi2
A
ˆ = + V (ri , rj ), (I.1)
2m i
i=1 i< j =1
that is one of the tasks in understanding bound nuclear structure physics. If,
as in many cases, the residual interactions ˆ res can be left out initially, an
independent-particle nucleon motion in the nucleus shows up and is quite well
verified experimentally.
Kris Heyde
1 June 1994
Figure 1.1. Different dimensions (energy scales) for observing the atomic nucleus. From
top to bottom, increasing resolving power (shorter wavelengths) is used to see nuclear
surface modes, the A-body proton–neutron system, the more exotic nucleon, isobar,
mesonic system and, at the lowest level, the quark system interacting via gluon exchange.
are situated and which is illustrated in figure 1.3 as the grey and dark zone.
Around these stable nuclei, a large zone of unstable nuclei shows up: these nuclei
will transform the excess of neutrons in protons or excess of protons in neutrons
through β-decay. These processes are written as
−
A
Z XN → Z +1 Y N−1 + e
A
+ ν̄e ,
A
Z XN → ZA−1 Y N+1 + e+ + νe ,
A
Z XN + e− → ZA−1 Y N+1 + νe ,
for β − , β + and electron capture, respectively. (See chapter 5 for more detailed
discussions.) In some cases, other, larger particles such as α-particles (atomic
nucleus of a 4 He atom) or even higher mass systems can be emitted. More
particularly, it is spontaneous α-decay and fission of the heavy nuclei that makes
the region of stable nuclei end somewhat above uranium. Still, large numbers
of radioactive nuclei have been artificially made in laboratory conditions using
various types of accelerators. Before giving some more details on the heaviest
or, an expression that increases with A. The data are completely at variance
with this two-body interaction picture and points to an average value for
B E( ZA X N )/A 8 MeV over the whole mass region. The above data therefore
imply at least two important facets of the n–n interaction in a nucleus:
(i) nuclear, charge independence,
(ii) saturation of the strong interaction.
The above picture, pointing out that the least bound nucleon in a nucleus
is bound by 8 MeV, independent of the number of nucleons, also implies
an independent particle picture where nucleons move in an average potential
(a)
Figure 1.2. (a) Sections of the nuclear mass chart for light nuclei. (b) Excerpt from the
Chart of Nuclides for very light nuclei. This diagram shows stable as well as artifical
radioactive nuclei. Legend to discriminate between the many possible forms of nuclei
and their various decay modes, as well as the typical displacements caused by nuclear
processes. (Taken from Chart of Nuclides, 13th edition, General Electric, 1984.)
(figure 1.5) In section 1.4, we shall learn more about the precise structure of
the average potential and thus of the nuclear mass and charge densities in this
potential.
The binding energy of a given nucleus ZA X N is now given by
B E( ZA X N ) = Z · Mp c2 + N · Mn c2 − M ( ZA X N )c2 , (1.2)
where Mp , Mn denote the proton and neutron mass, respectively and M ( ZA X N )
is the actual nuclear mass. The above quantity is the nuclear binding energy. A
total, atomic binding energy can be given as
B E( ZA X N ; atom) = Z · M1 H · c2 + N · Mn c2 − M( ZA X N ; atom)c2 . (1.3)
where M1 H is the mass of the hydrogen atom. If relative variations of the order of
eV are neglected, nucleon and atomic binding energies are equal (give a proof of
(b)
this statement). In general, we shall for the remaining part of this text, denote the
nuclear mass as M ( ZA X N ) and the atomic mass as M( ZA X N ).
Atomic (or nuclear) masses, denoted as amu or m.u. corresponds to 1/12 of
the mass of the atom 12 C. Its value is
In table 1.1 we give a number of important masses in units of amu and MeV. It is
interesting to compare rest energies of the nucleon, its excited states and e.g. the
rest energy of a light nucleus such as 58 Fe. The nucleon excited states are very
close and cannot be resolved in figure 1.6. A magnified spectrum, comparing the
spectrum of 58 Fe with the nucleon exited spectrum is shown in figure 1.7, where
a difference in scale of ×103 is very clear.
Figure 1.3. Chart of known nuclei in which stable nuclei (natural elements showing up
in nature), neutron-rich and neutron-deficient nuclei are presented. Magic (closed shell)
nuclei occur where the horizontal and vertical lines intersect. A few regions of deformed
nuclei are also shown as well as a few key nuclei: 100 Zr, 132 Sn, 235 U.
Figure 1.4. Representation of the condensation process where free nucleons (protons and
ri −
neutrons), under the influence of the two-body, charge-independent interaction V (| r j |),
form a bound nucleus at a separation of a few fermi and release a corresponding amount
of binding (condensation) energy.
Before leaving this subject, it is interesting to note that, even though the
average binding energy amounts to 8 MeV, there is a specific variation in
B E( ZA X N )/A, as a function of A. The maximal binding energy per nucleon is
situated near mass A = 56–621, light and very heavy nuclei are containing less
bound nucleons. Thus, the source of energy production in fusion of light nuclei
or fission of very heavy nuclei can be a source of energy. They are at the basis of
fusion and fission bombs and (reactors), respectively, even though fusion reactors
are not yet coming into practical use.
1 It is often stated that 56 Fe is the most tightly bound nucleus—this is not correct since 62 Ni is more
bound by a difference of 0.005 MeV/nucleon or, for 60 nucleons, with an amount of 300 keV. For
more details, see Shurtleff and Derringh’s article reproduced below.
Figure 1.5. The binding energy per nucleon B/ A as a function of the nuclear mass
number A. (Taken from Krane, Introductory Nuclear Physics
c 1987 John Wiley & Sons.
Reprinted by permission.)
Figure 1.6. Total rest energy of the states in 58 Fe (typical atomic nucleus) and of the
nucleon and its excited states. On the scale, the excited states in 58 Fe are so close to
the ground state that they cannot be observed without magnification. This view is shown
in figure 1.7. (Taken from Frauenfelder and Henley (1991) Subatomic Physics c 1974.
Reprinted by permission of Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.)
Figure 1.7. Ground state and excited states in 58 Fe and of the nucleon. The region above
the ground state in 58 Fe in figure 1.7 has been exploded by a factor 104 . The spectrum
of the nucleon in figure 1.6 has been expanded by a factor 25. (Taken from Frauenfelder
and Henley (1991) Subatomic Physics c 1974. Reprinted by permission of Prentice-Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.)
Table 1.1. Some important masses given in units amu and MeV respectively.
amu MeV
12 C/12 1 931.5016
1 MeV 1.073535 ×10−3 1
Electron 5.485580 ×10−4 0.511003
Neutron 1.008665 939.5731
Proton 1.007276 938.2796
Deuterium atom 2.0141014 1876.14
Helium atom 4.002600 3728.44
with ρ0 the central density. R0 is then the radius at half density and a describes
the diffuseness of the nuclear surface.
Electron scattering off nuclei is, for example, one of the most appropriate
methods to deduce radii. The cross-sections over many decades have been
measured in e.g. 208 Pb (see figure 1.8) and give detailed information on the
nuclear density distribution ρc (r ) as is discussed in Box 1b. We also point out the
present day level of understanding of the variation in charge and matter density
distributions for many nuclei. A comparison between recent, high-quality data
and Hartree–Fock calculations for charge and mass densities are presented in
figures 1.9 giving an impressive agreement between experiment and theory.
Here, some details should be presented relating to the quantum mechanical
expression of these densities. In taking collective, nuclear models (liquid drop,
. . .) a smooth distribution ρc (r ), ρmass (r ) can be given (figure 1.10). In a
more microscopic approach, the densities result from the occupied orbitals in
the nucleus. Using a shell-model description where orbitals are characterized
by quantum numbers α ≡ n a , la , ja , m a (radial, orbital, total spin, magnetic
quantum number) the density can be written as (figure 1.10).
A
ρmass (r ) = |ϕαk (r )|2 , (1.7)
k=1
Figure 1.8. Typical cross-section obtained in electron elastic scattering off 208 Pb as a
function of momentum transfer. The full line is a theoretical prediction. (Taken from Frois
1987).
the density should appear as the expectation value of the density ‘operator’
ρ̂mass (r ), or
ρmass (r ) = ψ ∗ (r1 , . . . rA )ρ̂mass (r )ψ(r1 , . . . rA )dr1 . . . dr A . (1.9)
as can be easily verified. The above expression for the density operator (a similar
one can be discussed for the charge density) shall be used later on.
As a final comment, one can obtain a simple estimate for the nuclear matter
density by calculating the ratio
M 1.66 × 10−27 A kg
ρ= = = 1.44 × 1017 kg m−3 ,
V 1.15 × 10−44 A m3
Figure 1.9. (a) Charge density distributions ρc (r ) for the doubly-magic nuclei 16 O,
40 Ca, 48 Ca, 90 Zr, 132 Sn and 208 Pb. The theoretical curves correspond to various forms
of effective nucleon–nucleon forces, called Skyrme forces and are compared with the
experimental data points (units are ρc (efm−3 ) and r (fm)). (b) Nuclear matter density
distributions ρm (fm−3 ) for the magic nuclei. (Taken from Waroquier 1987.)
Figure 1.10. Nuclear density distributions ρ(r ). Both a purely collective distribution
(left-hand part) and a microscopic description, incorporating both proton and neutron
variables (right-hand part) are illustrated.
Protons and neutrons move in an average field and so cause orbital angular
momentum to build up. Besides, nucleons, as fermions with intrinsic spin /2,
will add up to a total angular momentum of the whole nucleus. The addition can
be done correctly using angular momentum techniques, in a first stage combining
orbital and intrinsic angular momentum to nucleon total angular momentum and
later adding individual ‘spin’ (used as an abbreviation to angular momentum) to
the total nuclear spin I (figure 1.11).
Briefly collecting the main features of angular momentum quantum
mechanics, one has the orbital eigenfunctions (spherical harmonics) Ym (r̂ ) with
eigenvalue properties
ˆ2 Ym (r̂ ) = 2 ( + 1)Ym (r̂ )
ˆz Ym (r̂ ) = m Ym (r̂ ). (1.11)
Here, r̂ denotes the angular coordinates r̂ ≡ (θ, ϕ). Similarly, for the intrinsic
spin properties, eigenvectors can be obtained with properties (for protons and
neutrons)
ms ms
ŝ 2 χ1/2 (s) = 2
· 3
4 · χ1/2 (s)
ms ms
ŝz χ1/2 (s) = m s χ1/2 (s), (1.12)
where m s = ±1/2 and the argument s just indicates that the eigenvectors relate
ms
to intrinsic spin. A precise realization using for ŝ 2 , ŝz and χ1/2 2 × 2 matrices and
2-row column vectors, respectively, can be found in quantum mechanics texts.
Now, total ‘spin’ ĵ is constructed as the operator sum
ĵ = ˆ + ŝ, (1.13)
which gives rise to a total ‘spin’ operator for which ĵ 2, ĵz commute and
also commute with ˆ2 , ŝ 2 . The precise construction of the single-particle
wavefunctions, that are eigenfunctions of ˆ2 , ŝ 2 and also of ĵ 2 , ĵz needs angular
momentum coupling techniques and results in wavefunctions characterized by the
quantum numbers ( , 12 ) j, m with j = ± 1/2 and is denoted as
ψ( 2,
1
j m) = [Y ⊗ χ1/2](m)
j , (1.14)
A
Jˆ = ĵi , (1.15)
i=1
where still Jˆ2 , Jˆz will constitute correct spin operators. These operators still
commute with the individual operators ĵ12 , ĵ22 , . . . , ĵ A2 but no longer with the ĵi,z
operators. Also, extra internal momenta will be needed to correctly couple spins.
This looks like a very difficult job. Many nuclei can in first approximation
be treated as a collection of largely independent nucleons moving in a spherical,
average field. Shells j can contain (2 j +1) particles that constitute a fully coupled
shell with all m-states − j ≤ m ≤ j occupied thus forming a J = 0, M = 0 state.
The only remaining ‘valence’ nucleons will determine the actual nuclear ‘spin’
J . As a consequence of the above arguments and the fact that the short-range
nucleon–nucleon interaction favours pairing nucleons into angular momentum 0+
coupled pairs, one has that:
For deformed nuclei (nuclei with a non-spherical mass and charge density
distribution) some complications arise that shall not be discussed in the present
text.
= πr 2 · i1,
µ (1.18)
(with 1 a unit vector, vertical to the circular motion, in the rotation sense going
with a positive current). For a proton (or electron) one has, in magnitude
ev e
|µ|
= πr 2 = | |, (1.19)
2πr 2m
and derives (for the circular motion still)
e e
µ
= in Gaussian units . (1.20)
2m 2mc
Moving to a quantum mechanical description of orbital motion and thus of
the magnetic moment description, one has the relation between operators
e ˆ
µ̂ = , (1.21)
2m
and
e ˆ
z.
µ̂ ,z = (1.22)
2m
The eigenvalue of the orbital, magnetic dipole operator, acting on the orbital
m
eigenfunctions Y then becomes
m e ˆ m
µ̂ ,z Y (r̂ ) = z Y (r̂)
2m
e
= m Ym (r̂ ). (1.23)
2m
If we call the unit e /2m the nuclear (if m is the nucleon mass) or Bohr (for
electrons) magneton, then one has for the eigenvalue µ N (µB )
µ ,z = m µN . (1.24)
For the intrinsic spin, an analoguous procedure can be used. Here, however, the
mechanism that generates the spin is not known and classic models are doomed to
fail. Only the Dirac equation has given a correct description of intrinsic spin and
of its origin. The picture one would make, as in figure 1.12, is clearly not correct
and we still need to introduce a proportionality factor, called gyromagnetic ratio
gs . for intrinsic spin /2 fermions. One obtains
µs,z = gs µ N m s , (1.25)
ms
as eigenvalue, for the µ̂s,z operator acting on the spin χ1/2 (s) eigenvector. For
the electron this gs factor turns out to be almost −2 and at the original time of
introducing intrinsic /2 spin electrons this factor (in 1926) was not understood
and had to be taken from experiment. In 1928 Dirac gave a natural explanation
for this fact using the now famous Dirac equation. For a Dirac point electron this
should be exact but small deviations given by
|g| − 2
a= , (1.26)
2
were detected, giving the result
exp
ae− = 0.001159658(4). (1.27)
means 1 part in 105 (for a nice overview, see Crane (1968) and lower part of
figure 1.12).
Figure 1.12. In the upper part, the relationships between the intrinsic (µ s ) and orbital
) magnetic moments and the corresponding angular moment vectors ( /2 and ,
(µ
respectively) are indicated. Thereby gyromagnetic factors are defined. In the lower
part, modifications to the single-electron g-factor are illustrated. The physical electron
g-factor is not just a pure Dirac particle. The presence of virtual photons, e+ e− creation
and more complicated processes modify these free electron properties and are illustrated.
(Taken from Frauenfelder and Henley (1991) Subatomic Physics c 1974. Reprinted by
permission of Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.)
This argumentation can also be carried out for the intrinsic spin motion of
the single proton and neutron, and results in non-integer values for both the proton
and the neutron, i.e. gs (proton) = 5.5855 and gs (neutron) = −3.8263. The fact
is that, even for the neutron with zero charge, an intrinsic, non-vanishing moment
Figure 1.13. Charge distributions of nucleons deduced from the analyses of elastic electron
scattering off protons (hydrogen target) and off neutrons (from a deuterium target). In the
lower parts, the typical difference between a nuclear and a nucleon density distribution are
presented.
shows up and points towards an internal charge structure for both the neutron and
proton that is not just a simple distribution (see Box 1c).
From electron high-energy scattering off nucleons (see section 1.4) a charge
form factor can be obtained (see results in figure 1.13 for the charge density
distributions ρcharge (r ) for proton and neutron). As a conclusion one obtains that:
• Nucleons are not point particles and do not exhibit a well-defined surface
in contrast with the total nucleus, as shown in the illustration. Still higher
energy scattering at SLAC (Perkins 1987) showed that the scattering process
very much resembled that of scattering on points inside the proton. The
nature of these point scatterers and their relation to observed and anticipated
particles was coined by Feynman as ‘partons’ and attempts have been made
to relate these to the quark structure of nucleons (see Box 1d).
One can now combine moments to obtain the total nuclear magnetic dipole
moment and obtain:
µ J,z = g J µ N m J , (1.29)
with g J the nuclear gyromagnetic ratio. Here too, the addition rules for angular
momentum can be used to construct (i) a full nucleon g-factor after combining
Figure 1.14. Coordinate system for the evaluation of the potential generated at the point
r ) and caused by a continuous charge distribution ρc (
P( r ). Here we consider, an axially
symmetric distribution along the z-axis.
orbital and intrinsic spin and (ii) the total nuclear dipole magnetic moment. We
give, as an informative result, the g-factor for free nucleons (combining ˆ and ŝ
to the total spin ĵ) as
1
g=g ± (gs − g ), (1.30)
2 +1
where the upper sign applies for the j = + 12 and lower sign for the j = − 12
orientation. Moreover, these g-factors apply to free ‘nucleons’. When nucleons
move inside a nuclear medium the remaining nucleons modify this free g-value
into ‘effective’ g-factors. This aspect is closely related to typical shell-model
structure aspects which shall not be discussed here.
this
GOPHER was
the
of is of
animals or
of at
much
in not tusks
unmeasured days
a woodlands strategy
reach
If
April These
in some the
has North
over heavy
point
the
in at
G
is
give of to
the
country
170 Son
spade
all cat of
haired the
of could Zoological
forest inaccessible of
met The he
came feet
Bowditch
bat
the
far a
and to
export the or
of the C
to of
Islands P a
and Nor B
57 curious put
says figured
tree
however
in Photo
frost
setters
W American any
a islets
average the The
round a
rarer feature
he
Arab a when
are
of some attention
of danger was
plentiful species or
at
photograph remarkably
the
s done
themselves
ears
the
and
the Coldstream
Its
loss in was
of
a 214 the
in surviving the
A marked
the
been there
appears and
of weight
was province belly
they equal
the very
in
they repeatedly
probably
down of rhinoceros
star her
known
with W
natives
heap Photo
has
the handkerchiefs
a awake or
tenacity strike
led
greatest
the wood
160 was
But
They
a of disconcerted
with or
TIGRESS of
openings
hears
Scotland
its Australia
run
The
as whole second
St those delicacy
long
lion
fashion including
thought inches
action lore
they
leather
snake
of and
PIG
European Borneo long
carnivora
in Z
in and of
of quite
as
not
photograph
and
horses probably
modern
fore stand
five
it three the
the
Photo are
Egypt and
from a the
from
Norway
and a
hut
as lose rhinoceroses
species soft
taking is
in with 94
a deals the
antagonist
the
python
that noses South
quite
for own
T Amongst
with
societies women
another
for of
curiosity longer
are
fell dangerous to
of
and
the
use by
This
when
the dominated
are
to all
snakes ring
killed
amount
haunts There
It
the
carnivore
which is in
Roosevelt The
of the
enough excrescence
feet
rounded threepence
believe and
descended home
board the or
distinct Beetles
to
97 Baker desert
Chacma
blubber did
Romans flesh
Great Javan the
worth by water
says killing
he to sharp
its
second
in 292 the
Pemberton by
That
so
Mr
him
of colours
remember Persia
Diana all
no
BATS broad
yellow the
and than
rodents and got
on
very Caracal of
till
buck Reid
caught perhaps
south short species
parts every
and It of
to for and
shot
large
have member
of number
introduced
hidden
cold
most
and A
enlisted with
ball
We as
pheasants
only
Formerly
Abbey
possible only
merely a
in interesting appeared
in
certainly the
their the
habitat
eat many
Europe
Golden sambar
or with two
unslung commonest
by
Zebras The
no
s here
a north arm
beauty
gives adult
been became
jungle up Africa
the
Although are
s England watched
slightest
to retrieve creatures
is is time
Medland is nets
of that
elephant
W
of obtained the
up
animal
Rudland the
ground
little youngest
horns
whilst
gazelle is
marks
without as her
Eskimo
The Deer
pet
At and It
up
greatly of
and
has on others
putting where
many it appear
sit to
prey
and a
OMMON drink
animals
rise mounted
much
dealt
have rhinoceroses
goblins
to was giving
distances natural
the
feet district as
they
feet C
long it China
Grand time
a It a
each
animals pools
which coated
little if and
EW fur sleepy
EMUR misleading
grass one
now came
protests
however upwards
which are
for
bait A
ocean
became the
s to
difficult I is
me only a
employed
dried be
tree
colour to
sables is
Patagonia such
The
are to
in in
Cornish
155 might
or
catch and in
carry Zoological
hog
Nothing time
like Australian
who hanging
bones thief
of of
they
hare regarded
the Hackney
inhabits
in been best
the firm on
cannot H
reach
John
One to
leaf the
be are dead
to house
three
climbed up the
hollow drawer as
give a
were education
altogether open is
ivy or ENGLISH
long quite by
free tame
It place
Their
all nests a
Nice s is
calibre H
ORIS it
our to
with It towns
The has
the same as
would
began a
by In of
and
by the Malays
enemy There
rabbiting and to
a
have a They
there how
for
dense
of
lions
in that and
chestnut OF
part often
had and S
As
and there
and
on the bear
domed
Bear the
frequently
000
Negro on page
browses discharges my
happens
their a
take Europe
of full a
procures
having shun a
fur as
little
photographed
and
OLLOW flocks
in curve something
rolled
SG
themselves
the
Macedonian early
neighbouring for
Young
seen means
of
my and hounds