Commodification, Sexual Objectification and The Image of The African Woman in Beyond The Horizon
Commodification, Sexual Objectification and The Image of The African Woman in Beyond The Horizon
net/publication/388409847
CITATIONS READS
0 11
3 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Rhema F.E Oguche on 27 January 2025.
Keywords: sexual objectification, commodification, African woman, new historicism and feminist
ideology
Introduction
Feminist writing has always been replete with issues around representation. In fact, one of the arguments
of most early African feminist writers revolves around how the woman is projected by African male
writers. Feminist literature, like other African literatures before it, could be regarded as a protest
literature, which seeks to defend dignity and integrity, especially as it relates to misrepresentation of
women. For instance, Alkali (2012:13), in defense of dignity and integrity, holds that, for those who are
not married, they are usually represented as prostitutes, seductresses and women of easy virtue, despite
being highly placed career women. These arguments have, therefore, not only become recurring, but
continued to give voice to African feminism. African male writers have equally argued on the premise
that male characters are unfairly represented in the writings of their female counterparts; hence, the
growing arguments on gender representation in African writing. For instance, the perception of African
female writers is that, in a patriarchal structure, the woman is ideal as a wife, if she is subservient, useful
and serviceable to her husband and his relatives. Indeed, this buttresses Chukukere‟s (1995:9) claim that,
“the unsatisfactory appreciation of the significance of women in life has spilled into imaginative
literature”. Thus, on this basis, Peter (2010:30) advances that, feminism "wants society to change its
ideas on patriarchy and accept women as being a valuable part of society."
100
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
It is instructive to note, however, that the corpus of literature allows for contemplations of perceptions,
philosophies and ideologies. In fact, literature thrives in the desert of controversies occasioned by
divergent and opposing ideas. The ingenuity of a critic and/or writer is, therefore, reflected in the
controversy he/she generates or advances in his/her writing. It is on this premise that one can argue that
every literary text, reflecting whatever ideology, is replete with notions of representations. In other
words, every literary text is a representation of issues; one of which might be gender-based. This is
because the literary writer, being a product of a changing society, reflects in his writing, issues as he
perceives them; and the drivers of these issues are his characters.
In view of the foregoing, it is worthy to note that stereotyping or representation is, in fact, an expression
of creativity, as every literary writer, whether female or male, enriches the corpus of his/her writing
through stereotypes. One could, therefore, contest that every literary writing is an expression of varying
dimensions of representations and stereotypes. Amma Darko‟s Beyond the Horizon, is, arguably, a
reflection of dimensions of representations, graphically illustrated by the characters; their actions and
inactions, especially the female characters that are projected as objects. It is worthy to note that all
bodies (male and female) are controlled and could be commoditised, as seen in the media and
advertising. The concern of this study is, however, to illustrate the way the woman‟s body is controlled
by the man, as exemplified in Beyond the Horizon.
Theoretical Framework
The emergence of new historicism could be seen as a response to the limitations of the earlier literary
theories, such as New Criticism and Formalism. These approaches tended to focus on the literary text
itself and its formal elements, rather than the social and historical contexts in which it was produced. It
is an interdisciplinary approach to literary criticism that examines literature in the context of the
historical and cultural circumstances in which it was produced. Accordingly, new historicism
emphasises the interrelationship between literature and history and the ways in which power relations,
social norms and cultural practices are reflected and contested in literary texts. New historicists, thus,
believe that all cultural artefacts, including literature, are embedded in the social and political structures
of their time. Thus, the new historicist explores how cultural texts participate in the shaping of social
and political power relations.
Significantly, new historicism, as a literary theory, is based on the idea that literature should be studied
and interpreted within the context of both the history of the author and the history of the critic. Based on
the literary criticism of Stephen Greenblatt and influenced by the philosophy of Michel Foucault, New
Historicism acknowledges not only that a work of literature is influenced by its author's times and
circumstances, but that the critic's response to that work is also influenced by his environment, beliefs,
and prejudices. As a literary theory, it argues that literature should be understood and interpreted within
its historical and cultural context; this involves examining both the context of production and the context
of reception. In The Power of Forms in the English Renaissance (1982), Greenblatt discusses literature
in relation to “self-fashioning” in renaissance period. Self-fashioning is used to explain how individuals
create their identity in line with societal norms and cultural expectations. For example, nobles would
dress in a way which denoted their station and fashioned themselves to reflect the identity they wanted
to convey, and what was expected for someone of that class.
101
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
In view of this, Beyond the Horizon, from a new historicist perspective, lend itself to an introspection of
the manifestations of the complex and complicated prevailing socio-cultural conditions that the African
woman is grappling with. Accordingly, Beyond the Horizon yields itself to concerns of feminism;
hence, its deployment as another tool for interrogating the experiences of the African woman.
Considering the nature of the text, therefore, Martha Nussbaum‟s (1995:275) paradigm of feminism, for
which she describes how women are sexually objectified, is deployed. She identifies these seven
features, depicting how a person is treated as an object: instrumentality: the treatment of a person as a
tool for the objectifier‟s purposes; denial of autonomy: the treatment of a person as lacking in autonomy
and self-determination; inertness: the treatment of a person as lacking in agency, and perhaps also in
activity; fungibility: the treatment of a person as interchangeable with other objects; violability: the
treatment of a person as lacking in boundary-integrity; ownership: the treatment of a person as
something that is owned by another (can be bought or sold); and denial of subjectivity: the treatment of a
person as something whose experiences and feelings (if any) need not be taken into account.
Feminist critical theory examines the oppression of women in literature. Tyson (2006:86) argues that the
society is so immersed in patriarchy that it is programmed “not to see the way women are oppressed by
traditional gender roles”. Some feminist critics consider this oppressive culture against women as
patriarchy; hence, the pursuit by African feminist writers in raising the consciousness of women on the
stifling grips of patriarchy, which is perceived to have trapped so many women. Feminism is, thus, “tied
to raising consciousness about the patriarchy in which many women feel trapped”. In other words, it
reveals how literary texts demonstrate the repression and powerlessness of women in different periods
and cultures (Gardner, 2004:42-43).
For some feminist critics, therefore, the restoration of the dignity of the woman is what drives their
philosophy, as they perceive feminism to be far more than either a search for mere social equality within
the status-quo or individual fulfillment. It is against this backdrop that Bunch (1981) claims that, one of
the goals of feminism is hinged on the premise that,
The freedom from oppression for women involves not only equity but also
the right of women to freedom of choice and the power to control their
own lives within and outside of the homes, having control over their lives
and bodies is essential to ensure a sense of dignity and autonomy for
women. (249-252).
Premised upon the foregoing, Beyond the Horizon has been located within the purview of the theories of
new historicism and feminist critical theory to examine the cultural conundrum, as well as oppression
and exploitation of the sexuality of the African woman. Sexual objectification is a concept that is hinged
on the radical feminist theory. It focuses on how a person, especially a woman is treated as an object.
Consequently, Dworkin (2000: 30–1) puts forward that, sexual objectification:
occurs when a human being, through social means, is made less than
human, turned into a thing or commodity, bought and sold. When
objectification occurs, a person is depersonalised, so that no individuality
or integrity is available socially or in what is an extremely circumscribed
privacy. Objectification is an injury right at the heart of discrimination:
102
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
those who can be used as if they are not fully human are no longer fully
human in social terms; their humanity is hurt by being diminished.
Oftentimes, the projections of the African woman in both literary texts from African male and female
writers have always showcased the African woman in a light that evokes a sense of critical assessment.
For, while the argument from African female critics has been that, African male writers are biased in
their projections of the African woman, as subservient, docile and lacking in self worth, it is also
important to also note that, some of the writings from female writers are also replete with the same
„damaging‟ image of the African woman. This may however, be to probably further their critique of the
African man as one who does not respect the sensibilities of the African woman, as in the case of Mara
and other African women in Beyond the Horizon, where they are not only commoditised, but are meant
to face very dehumanising and psychological sexual experiences. In other words, Beyond the Horizon is
couched with different layers and nuances of sexual objectification and dehumanisation against the
female characters. This could possibly be seen as an indictment on the male characters, who are
projected as lacking in empathy, especially for women, who they see as mere commodities for sexual
gratification. This reinforces one of Nusbaum‟s (1995:275) positions on the description of the concept of
sexual objectification, wherein a person is treated as an object. She refers to this as, instrumentality,
which is considered as the treatment of a person as a tool for the objectifier‟s purposes. This further
aligns with Kant‟s claim on objectification, which, for him, focuses largely on instrumentality: the
treatment of a person as a mere tool for the lover‟s purposes. Objectification, for Kant, just as Nusbaum
also advances, involves regarding someone “as an object, something for use” (Herman 1993:57). It,
therefore, seems as though, Beyond the Horizon seeks to demystify and deconstruct the existing
patriarchal mores by projecting men as irresponsible, worthless and wicked, in order to evoke a new
social order.
As exemplified by Mara, the protagonist, it is pertinent to note that, sexual objectification, which
implies, among other things, the commercialisation of the human (woman) body for financial reasons is
a recurring issue in both Darko‟s Faceless and Beyond the Horizon. For, while Mara in Beyond the
Horizon is lured into prostitution in Germany by her husband, Akobi, Baby T, in Faceless is forced to
sell her body within the shores of Africa. This shows that the same „sex trade‟ takes place in two
different locations, wherein African women are projected as the victims of this highly organised cartel.
In other words, the two societies (Africa and Europe), as depicted in these texts, are entrapped in a
quagmire, where materialism becomes the new language; and money the new god. It is on this ground,
therefore, that both Mara and Baby T illustrate Nusbaum‟s concept of instrumentality.
For Mara, who is far away in Germany, unlike Baby T whose life gets twisted on the African soil, life
seems very complicated, especially in a society that the woman is also highly sexualised and constantly
abused. Through her inner contemplations, she reveals how psychologically downcast she has become.
She does not only express self-hate, but also the wreck she has become as a result of the constant
exploitation of her sexuality. This is captured thus:
103
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
As depicted above, it is obvious that, through the eyes of Mara, the depravity in the society is described.
For, Mara is not only a victim who has been “used and abused by strange men”, other women like her
are also constantly being sexually objectified. This situation has forced her into becoming a psychopath,
as she is now withdrawn, “so friendless, isolated and cold”. It is within this light that the level of
transnational sex slavery that has characterised the 21st century, of which African women are victims, is
showcased. In other words, Beyond the Horizon does not only catalogue the transnational sex slave
cartel; it equally exposes how some African women who traversed the boundaries of Africa have
become victims of this trade; hence, trading their human dignity in foreign lands.
The opening chapter of the novel vividly explores the current state of Mara, the commercialisation of the
woman‟s body and the damaging effect this has on her psychology as well. Using her mirror as a symbol
to painfully illustrate and report the transformation in her body, especially from the constant use and
abuse, she exposes how other women like her are also victims, as captured in her description of the
actions going on in other adjoining rooms, thus: “…there are pretty women like myself, one in each
room waiting to be used and abused by strange men” (Beyond the Horizon, 1). It is, therefore, through
Mara‟s eyes that the sex cartel is exposed. In other words, cast in a journalistic narrative, one could say
that Mara, having transformed from a greenhorn into a whore in a German brothel, takes the posture of a
journalist and a victim to report the incidents as they are taking place. She gives a firsthand account, as
she reveals that,
I am just in my brief silky red underpants, so I‟m virtually naked, but that
is not why I feel so cold…it‟s deep inside me that feels this chilliness,
from the dejected soul my body harbours, a soul grown old from too much
use of its shelter. Yes! I‟ve used myself and I have allowed myself to be
too used to care any longer (Beyond the Horizon, 1).
The image of a psychologically and emotionally traumatised woman is enunciated through the eyes of
Mara, whose pain has become synonymous with the pain every woman in her „profession‟ goes through.
Each time she looks into the mirror, she sees an image of a woman whose body has “grown old” as a
result of “too much use”. Mara‟s observation of her body as being „worn out‟, reflects Nussbaum‟s
(1995:275) description of sexual objectification within the concept of instrumentality, as well as
Langton‟s (2009:228-229) description of it as, reduction to body, which he refers to as the treatment of a
person as identified with their body, or body parts. Significantly, one could say that, Mara might not
have had a good reflection of her present state, were it not for the mirror in her room. She has been able
to see how worn out and out of shape she has become, due to the constant abuse by men. This situation
has further created a ground for her to create a false image of herself, by hiding certain features she
deems unattractive. She affirms that, “I fear what I see when I look at myself. I shiver at the sight of my
sore cracked lips, which still show through the multiple layers of the glossy crimson paint I apply to hide
them”.
104
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
It is obvious that the sexually objectified Mara does not seem happy with her present physique and, as
such, in a bid to look like her past, which she probably relishes, she further resorts to deception, as she
would apply “multiple layers of the glossy crimson paint” on her “cracked lips” in order to hide them
(Beyond the Horizon, 1-2). This implies that, even though she is caught in the web of this undignified
„profession‟, she sees her past as more dignifying than her current state; hence, her decision to live a
deceptive life. This presupposes, therefore, that, following the trend of deception that characterises the
society, Mara becomes a symbol, as she conceals her identity in “layers of the glossy crimson paint”.
Accordingly, this shows how the „profession‟ encourages women, especially, to lead deceptive lives,
probably in order to attract „clients‟ (Beyond the Horizon, 1-2).
Just like it is captured in Faceless, where young girls are not only forced into selling their bodies, but
depicted as tools or properties to be bought in exchange for money, Beyond the Horizon also projects
this picture, as women are depicted as objects and properties. In a contrastive manner, Faceless and
Beyond the Horizon display the sexual abuses that women go through, although the level of
psychological pain depicted seems different. Whereas in Faceless, young teenage girls are the victims,
Beyond the Horizon focuses on adult women as victims. Similarly, it seems the psychological trauma
experienced by Mara differs in high proportion from that of Baby T. This may be due to the fact that,
being outside the shores of Africa, Mara‟s ordeal is more compounded as she may not really have
anyone to run to, like Baby T, who would sometime run to Maa Tsuru to complain of Onko‟s untoward
advances.
The psychologically downcast Mara, from a contrastive standpoint, evinces the likely situation back in
Africa, while she faces her ordeal in Germany. Through her eyes, the two different worlds - Africa and
Europe are showcased. She worries about how her mother would feel, given her present condition,
wherein she has not only become a constant object for sexual gratification, but also physical abuses, as
she contemplates thus:
What my mother back home in black Africa would say to these hideous
traces of bites and scratches all over my neck, should she ever have the
misfortune of seeing them, I fear to imagine. They extend even far beyond
the back of my ears, several bruises and scars left generously there by the
sadistic hands of my best payers, my best spenders…I have yet another
handicap too, my little left finger…the injury was done to me by one of
my best spenders…(Beyond the Horizon, 2).
To further reinforce the treatment meted out to her, which has put her in a psychological cocoon and a
state of aloneness, she reveals how Oves, one of her “payers and spenders‟ treats her as his exclusive
property. This treatment by Oves further depicts one of the descriptions of sexual objectification as
illustrated by Nussbaum (1995:275). For Nussbaum, this situation is referred to as, ownership, which
she claims to mean: the treatment of a person as something that is owned by another (can be bought or
sold). Each time she is sexualised and brutalised, she takes solace in crying; revealing her helplessness
and her being at the mercy of her „payers‟. This gory and horrid experience of Mara does not only
exemplify the pain of the African woman; it also reinforces the terrible experience some African women
are made to go through in the quest for greener pasture. Mara, one could say, becomes a metaphor for
modern slavery, as she narrates that “…he does horrible things to me…I bear it because it is part of my
105
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
job…even when he puts me in pain and spits on me and calls me a nigger fool, I still offer him my
crimson smile and pretend he‟s just called me a princess” (Beyond the Horizon, 3). Indeed, the image
painted here is that of slavery and it characterises what some African women are made to go through by
some human traffickers like Akobi, who, ironically, is her husband. For, as a victim, she creates an
escapist route to always surmount her predicament. Being helpless, therefore, she resorts to crying as a
means to let out her pain, in order to forge ahead. She says: “…when I‟ve got my crying to do, I sit here
alone before my large oval mirror and stare painfully at this bit of garbage that once used to be me and I
cry” (Beyond the Horizon, 3).
Furthermore, cast in the image of a property, Mara exemplifies and advances the claim by feminist
writers that holds that, women are perceived by men as personal items; hence, their treatment as such.
The height of this is revealed through the contemplations and lamentations of Mara, who is not only
repeatedly traumatised by a man that claims to be her husband, but by other men too, to whom she has
been sold by the same husband, as a tool for sexual gratification and exploitation. As a result of this
constant objectification and sexualisation, Mara expresses a defeatist tendency by affirming that she is,
indeed, a property. She affirms that, “this man I call Oves… He is my lord, my master and my pimp… I
am his pawn, his slave and his property. What he orders, I do” (Beyond the Horizon, 3). Indeed, riddled
with a series of sexual abuses that have psychologically enslaved her, Mara, like Baby T and Maa Tsuru
in Faceless, does not only lose her voice, but also her dignity and power of resistance and coordination.
In other words, having been psychologically and emotionally enslaved, she loses direction as she is no
longer in control of her mind; hence, she becomes Oves‟ “pawn” and “property”, as she declares, “what
he orders, I do”. From her reflection, it becomes obvious that she used to be the property of another lord;
an indication that reflects how women are reduced to items that can be transferred from one hand to
another, as money exchanges hands (Beyond the Horizon, 3). Similarly, through a flashback technique,
she indicts even her own father as a culprit in her present predicament. She recalls that:
Predicated against the foregoing, it becomes instructive to note that, from Mara‟s recollections, those
responsible for her present woes are all men. This, no doubt, advances yet again, the feminist argument,
where women are projected as always at the mercy of men. For Mara‟s father to be indicted in this mess
is a depiction that reinforces and heightens the proposition of injustice, marginalisation and
objectification of the woman, being advanced by African female writers, among others. This
presupposes that she has come to the realisation that all the men with whom she has had experiences,
have always taken advantage of her; seeing her as their “pawn”, slave, and “property” (Beyond the
Horizon, 3). Her journey into this lifestyle of prostitution and sexual enslavement begins from the day
her father marries her off to Akobi, to whose father he is indebted. This, no doubt, is a clear
manifestation of Nussbaum‟s (1995:275) idea of fungibility (the treatment of a person as interchangeable
with other objects). By this, Mara becomes an object that is interchangeable with another object (her
father‟s indebtedness). This is brought to light as Mara explains:
106
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
I don‟t know why of all the eligible women in the village his father chose
me. I only know that the choice, for my father, could not have come at a
better time. A man he owed money to had come and forcefully claimed his
debt in the form of eight of father‟s eleven goats. So my dowry came in
handy… I later learnt that, drunk from palmwine and belching
boisterously, he had proclaimed that he would gladly have given me away
even for one goat. But like I said, Akobi‟s father bought me off very
handsomely (Beyond the Horizon, 6-7).
Mara‟s situation reveals her insistence on the grounds that she has been ‘thingified’, as lucidly
enunciated in her choice of words. For, it is glaring that she is only valued as a “property” comparable to
just “one goat”. This gives credence to Nussbaum‟s (1995:275) paradigm of sexual objectification,
which she refers to as ownership: the treatment of a person as something that is owned by another (can
be bought or sold). Thus, she acknowledges that, indeed, “Akobi‟s father bought” her “off very
handsomely”. This is far above the value placed on her by her own father, who equates her for just “one
goat”. Although expressed lightly, there is an undertone of a biting sarcasm attached in her statement.
For, she says of her husband – Akobi, “three weeks later he came straight from work on a Friday
evening, arriving in Naka on Saturday, and left for the city on the same Saturday with me as his
wife…and property” (Beyond the Horizon, 7).
The experiences of Mara oscillate within three geographical settings: the first being in her village, Naka,
where she is „sold‟ to Akobi; the second is the very harsh condition she is exposed to in the city by
Akobi; and the third being the height of her ordeal in faraway Germany. Mara is, thus, introduced as a
character that never had it well in life. In other words, her present predicament is a culmination of a
process that began from her village in Naka. Whereas Mara‟s life in the village seems quite without so
much oppression, her new life in the city, where one would expect her to be more comfortable, becomes
couched in very horrid and harrowing circumstances. For instance, it is in the city where she expects
civility and decorum, especially from her husband, who is admired by many in the village; being “the
first Naka son with a school certificate” (Beyond the Horizon, 3), that she begins to experience the most
harrowing forms of dehumanisation and humiliation. In comparing her mother‟s marriage to her own
marriage experience, she reveals that:
As presented above, Mara‟s eyes become the window for showcasing the harsh experiences other
women in Naka go through in the hands of men, in marriage. Similarly, through her lamentation and
reflection, she contrasts the experiences of the women in the village to those in the city. While it seems
that women in the village have been psychologically conditioned and hypnotised not to question the
excesses of their husbands, some very few women in the city seem to have a little courage and the
107
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
temerity to speak out. One of such women is Mama Kiosk, whose ideology and philosophy is in sharp
contrast with that of Mara and other women in Naka. Obviously, Mara is also a victim of this
psychological enslavement, as she believes in the ideology that whatsoever she suffers in her marriage is
normal as a wife; hence, her opinion that, “I still regarded my suffering as part of being a wife (Beyond
the Horizon, 13). While one could argue that, while Mara, as well as her mother and other women in
Naka are projected as symbols of respect for tradition, Mama Kiosk is depicted as a rebel, because she
challenges the patriarchal inhibitions and restrictions that have kept the woman perpetually voiceless.
For Mara, therefore, being in the city has not really translated into any form of mental growth. She still
holds tenaciously, the words of her mother who has repeatedly cautioned her that, “a wife was there for
a man for one thing, and that was to ensure his well-being, which included his pleasure”. More so, while
the woman is considered a tool for oppression, dehumanisation and humiliation, the man is idolised by
the same woman whom he dehumanises. This is what Mara also elicits, when she narrates how her
parents and family elders caution her, saying, “obey and worship your husband” (Beyond the Horizon,
13). This action by her parents and family elders could be seen as a display of such kind of sexual
objectification that Nusbaum (1995:275) describes as denial of autonomy, which she refers to as the
treatment of a person as lacking in autonomy and self determination. Langton (2009:228-229),
however, describes this type of sexual objectification as silencing, which he confirms to mean, the
treatment of a person as if they are silent and lacking the capacity to speak.
In order to challenge the stereotypical image of the docile woman, Beyond the Horizon imbues some of
its characters, especially Mama Kiosk, with a radical ideology. In this breath, she is used to represent the
radical feminist, as she does not exhibit any iota of docility and conservatism, as most female characters
are known to; rather, she challenges the inappropriate use of tradition to enslave the women. She, thus,
represents a break from the norm, while acting as the voice of reason. She reveals the manipulation of
culture to gag women, as she brings to Mara‟s knowledge that her husband manipulates tradition to her
detriment. This could be gleaned, thus:
Your husband is one of those who have no respect for village people.
…tradition demands that the wife respect, obey and worship her husband
but it demands, in return, care, good care of the wife. Your husband
neglects you and yet demands respect and complete worship from you.
That is not normal (Beyond the Horizon, 13).
Mama Kiosk‟s association with Mara, indeed, exposes Mara‟s naivety in many aspects. For instance,
while Mara considers all that her husband does to her as normal, Mama Kiosk shares a different opinion.
In Mara‟s words, “…all the things that I considered to be normal, Mama Kiosk did not find normal”.
Rather than align with Mara‟s idolisation of Akobi, her husband, Mama Kiosk would bluntly let Mara
know that Akobi “is a man, but a bad husband”, as there is no law that exempts him from buying things
for his wife, or from taking good care of her (Beyond the Horizon, 13-14). From this standpoint, one
could notice that Mara has, indeed, lost her individuality, as she has successfully been mentally
conditioned and positioned by the ideology of not only obeying, idolising and worshipping her husband,
but also seeing all his actions towards her as not only “normal”, but sacred. This same cultural ideology,
she observes, is what has kept so many women, including her own mother, in their marriages.
As a couple, the only time Akobi gets close to his wife is either when he wants to beat her, or when he
wants to sleep with her. There is nothing that demonstrates that the two of them are husband and wife
108
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
(Beyond the Horizon, 20). It seems Akobi only sees Mara, not as his wife, but his instrument for sexual
gratification. This again confirms Nussbaum‟s description of a person treated in this manner as,
instrumentality: a situation where a person is treated as a tool for the objectifier‟s purposes. In this
regard, it is not only men like of Oves that use and abuse Mara sexually; she is equally sexually
objectified by the man who paid her dowry – her husband (Beyond the Horizon, 22). This further
underscores the view that Akobi is probably married to Mara, not to build a home, but to institute a
business and an empire. To further this, Mara is subtly drugged and introduced into the transcontinental
sex trade by her own husband (Beyond the Horizon, 111). In fact, she is not only drugged by her
husband in connivance with Gitte, she is also made a sex object for other men of different extractions to
explore. So dehumanising is the fact that, not only is her emotion abused; her right as an adult to consent
is equally violated. This action, one could infer, is illustrative of the view that the humanity of the
woman is not valued by men, as she is only seen as an object for sexual gratification, not necessarily as a
human being, without any fundamental right; she is not necessarily a human being whose emotions
should be respected. To further his sex trade business, of which Mara is the object, Mara confirms that,
she “was made the property of a good-looking dark haired man who owned a sex nightclub called
Peepy” (Beyond the Horizon, 114)
It is pertinent to note that, the consent of Mara is never sought by her husband, in matters relating to her
wellbeing. She is either forced into it, or deceived and manipulated into it. This reveals how much of a
commodity she has been turned into. In other words, Mara exemplifies the commoditised woman,
whose body has been reduced to an object of merchandise for monetary gain, and in this instance, by
her husband, who commoditises, eroticises and sexualises her, as revealed thus,
Conclusion
African female writing has always projected the African woman as a victim of the patriarchal society,
where she is constantly derided, oppressed, marginalised and assumed to be a second class citizen in the
scheme of things, in comparison with her male counterparts. In other words, while it seems feminist
critics have continued to register their voices in challenging this status quo, it is assumed that, the 21st
century African society, in its dynamic and fluid state, keeps changing with new strategies and
dimensions in its treatment of the woman. It is in this state of fluidity that one could argue that Beyond
the Horizon periscopes a highly sexualised 21st century society, where images of erotic codes, symbols,
messages and artefacts permeate and have continued to pervade the sights, senses, sensibilities and
spaces of the society, wherein the woman, being sexually objectified and commoditised, is being used as
the image of these codes.
109
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
References
110
LAFIYA JOURNAL OF ARTS VOL. 8, 2024 LAJA
Haslanger, Sally, 1993, “On Being Objective and Being Objectified”, in A Mind of One’s Own.
Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Louise M. Antony and Charlotte Witt (eds.),
Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westview Press, 209–253.
Herman, Barbara, 1993, “Could It Be Worth Thinking About Kant on Sex and Marriage?”, in A
Mind of One’s Own. Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity, Louise M. Antony and
Charlotte Witt (eds.), Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westview Press, 53–72.
Kant I. (1963). Lectures on Ethics. Infield (trans.), New York: Harper and Row.
Langton, Rae (1993). “Beyond a Pragmatic Critique of Reason”, Australasian Journal of
Philosophy, 71(4): 364–384. https://philpapers.org/asearch.pl?pub=103
Langton, Rae (2009) Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and
Objectification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacKinnon, Catharine (1987). Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and
London, England: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, Martha (1995). “Objectification”. In Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24(4): 249–
291. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x
Olufemi, Oke (2012). “Revolutionary Aesthetics in Nigerian Feminist Drama: Wale Ogunyemi‟s
Queen Amina of Zazzau and Akinwumi Ishola‟s Madam Tinubu as Focus. In Gender
Politics: Women’s Writings and Film in Northern Nigeria. (Eds). Ahmed Yerima and
Saeedat Aliyu. Ibadan: Kraft Books. pp. 11-20.
Oguche, R.F.E and Omojuyigbe A.O (2017). “Gender and Insecurity: An Examination
of Nawal El-Saadawi‟s Woman at Point Zero and Chimamanda Adichie‟s
Americanah”. Journal of the Literary Society of Nigeria (JLSN). Iss 9. pp 217-
231.
Peter, Zola Welcome. (2010). The Depiction of Female Characters By Male Writers in Selected
Isixhosa Drama Works. Diss, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University.
Quinn, Edward (2006). A Dictionary of Literary and Thematic Terms. New York: Infobase
Publishing.
Raji, Wumi (1999). “Modern Literary Theories and Criticism”. In Adegbija, E (ed). The English
Language and Literature in English: An Introductory Handbook. University of Ilorin. pp.
218-234.
Soble, Alan (2002a). “Sexual Use and What to Do about It: Internalist and Externalist Sexual
Ethics”, in The Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings, A. Soble (ed.), Lanham,
Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., pp. 259–288.
111