(Ebook) Transhumanism: A Realistic Future? by Jean-Pierre Fillard ISBN 9789811211386, 9789811211393, 9789811211409, 9789811212109, 9811211388, 9811211396, 981121140X, 9811212104 PDF Download
(Ebook) Transhumanism: A Realistic Future? by Jean-Pierre Fillard ISBN 9789811211386, 9789811211393, 9789811211409, 9789811212109, 9811211388, 9811211396, 981121140X, 9811212104 PDF Download
by Jean-
Pierre Fillard ISBN 9789811211386, 9789811211393,
9789811211409, 9789811212109, 9811211388, 9811211396,
981121140X, 9811212104 Pdf Download
https://ebooknice.com/product/transhumanism-a-realistic-
future-23526382
★★★★★
4.7 out of 5.0 (23 reviews )
DOWNLOAD PDF
ebooknice.com
(Ebook) Transhumanism: A Realistic Future? by Jean-Pierre
Fillard ISBN 9789811211386, 9789811211393, 9789811211409,
9789811212109, 9811211388, 9811211396, 981121140X,
9811212104 Pdf Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebooknice.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-6661374
https://ebooknice.com/product/matematik-5000-kurs-2c-larobok-23848312
https://ebooknice.com/product/sat-ii-success-math-1c-and-2c-2002-peterson-
s-sat-ii-success-1722018
(Ebook) Master SAT II Math 1c and 2c 4th ed (Arco Master the SAT
Subject Test: Math Levels 1 & 2) by Arco ISBN 9780768923049,
0768923042
https://ebooknice.com/product/master-sat-ii-math-1c-and-2c-4th-ed-arco-
master-the-sat-subject-test-math-levels-1-2-2326094
(Ebook) Cambridge IGCSE and O Level History Workbook 2C - Depth
Study: the United States, 1919-41 2nd Edition by Benjamin
Harrison ISBN 9781398375147, 9781398375048, 1398375144,
1398375047
https://ebooknice.com/product/cambridge-igcse-and-o-level-history-
workbook-2c-depth-study-the-united-states-1919-41-2nd-edition-53538044
https://ebooknice.com/product/brain-vs-computer-the-challenge-of-the-
century-5755600
https://ebooknice.com/product/gypsies-an-illustrated-history-34606218
https://ebooknice.com/product/transformation-of-collective-intelligences-
perspective-of-transhumanism-5679070
https://ebooknice.com/product/stability-domains-1651298
A Realistic Future?
Jean-Pierre Fillard
World Scientific
NEW JERSEY • LONDON • SINGAPORE • BEIJING • SHANGHAI • HONG KONG • TAIPEI • CHENNAI • TOKYO
TRANSHUMANISM
A Realistic Future?
Copyright © 2020 by World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
All rights reserved. This book, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval
system now known or to be invented, without written permission from the publisher.
For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance
Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy
is not required from the publisher.
ISBN 978-981-121-138-6
ISBN 978-981-121-210-9 (pbk)
Printed in Singapore
Contents
About Jean-Pierre Fillardvii
Introductionix
Conclusion189
vii
Introduction
“Transhumanism is an international philosophical movement that advocates for the
transformation of the human condition by developing and making widely available
sophisticated technologies to greatly enhance human intellect and physiology.”1
1
“A history of transhumanist thought”, Nick Boström, Journal of Evolution and
Technology, February 21, 2006. Available at https://nickbostrom.com/papers/history.pdf
2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhumanism
ix
(some say God) has arranged. However, taking into account the consider-
able development of our scientific knowledge, would the theory now have
to be reversed by adapting the surrounding to the Trans-human will or
even a Post-human one? How soon will such a change come about?
At present, the fantastic take off of knowledge in every domain of
Science, stimulated by a powerful technology, triggered the imagination
of a realistic possible future well beyond the Darwinian expectations of
evolution. Some even evoke the imminent coming of a “Singularity”3,4
which would bluntly change the existing order of our lives. A dedicated
university, the Singularity University, has even been set up in California
to develop research and teaching in this field. International meetings have
also been held worldwide to coordinate discussions on transhumanism,
with the last one in London.5
The leading players on the Internet such as GAFAM6 or NATU in the
United States (U.S.),7 and BATX8 in China developed practical transhu-
manist approaches with renewed scientific research axes. In this effort,
they have benefitted, for some years, from the vast financial means and
huge databases fed by their own social networks.
In that aim two different research trails may be followed: the first one
is concerned with biology (brain, genomics, stem cells, and so on) while
the second one is “mineral”, with computers (software, electronics, robot-
ics, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the like). Which one will be the first to
decisively “improve” Man? No one can yet say but it would take only a
good technical trigger to launch the process. Perhaps a mix of both; the
computer has begun to know so many things about our body and mental
constitution that it might be able to draw pertinent conclusions!
Would the difficult issue of energy be solved for a peaceful future?
Since the beginning, new kinds of energy were the trigger for implementa-
3
The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, Ray Kurzweil, Penguin
Books, 2006.
4
Singularity, in mathematical language, denotes a sharp rupture in a continuous evolution
curve.
5
TransVision Conference, July 2019.
6
Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft.
7
Netflix, AirBnb, Tesla, Uber.
8
Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent.
Introduction xi
9
“When will computer hardware match the human brain?”, Hans Moravec, Journal of
Evolution and Technology. Vol. 1, 1998.
defamation of the old rules, but the last ones are rigid enough to already
enter into a last chance fight.
The aim of this book is to update readers about the possible future
that can be expected from such a projected evolution; after years of daz-
zling excitement surrounding this topic, time has come for an appeasing
discussion.
The book will be structured in three parts:
You will note that each part, like the title of the book, includes a ques-
tion mark at the end.
Part I
Where Does Transhumanism
Come From?
Chapter One
The Origins and Further
It was a long, slow process of maturation which prompted us, Nature and
man, to our present state. Let me explain how this happened and where
our fates have led us, from the prime times of our mortal destinies.
Our current civilization is the outcome of many small elements disor-
derly accumulated but also several decisive steps that definitively changed
our way of life. They resulted in milestones that punctuate our history and
irrevocably “changed Man” in his way of life, his behavior, his beliefs
thereby affecting his progeny. These changes etched themselves in our
habits, irretrievably.
Let us now look at some of these milestones that have brought us
unquestionable welfare benefits.
This is tentatively sketched in Table 1.1 where are reported the cor-
responding evolutions of the mean life expectation and the world popula-
tion. The trigger for each of the new steps in civilizations was the
successive discoveries of a new kind of available energy which brought
about a new level of comfort and security. However, if the previous civili-
zations were all preceded and induced by a new form of energy, this is no
longer true today where the digital age 2.0 did not arise from a new energy
form but from a scientific discovery that upset everything: the transistor
effect, giving rise to our current digital world. Could this indicate that we
have entered for the first time a new way of doing?
Along this extended path, well before the established transhumanists
arrived, the idea of improving our being has long been addressed. The
great epic of Gilgamesh may be the first historical evocation of a
“Superman” (a dream obviously inspired by the Gods) who benefited
from an extension of the mean human status. Then there were numerous
searches for a recipe to reach immortality: the fountain of youth, the elixir
of long life, and any kinds of effort to prevent ageing and death but noth-
ing worked.
The transhumanist philosophy found its roots in the French Renaissance
(15th century) with the philosophy of the Enlightenment1 when Pic de la
Mirandole invited Man “to sculpt his own statue”. Later Marquis de
Condorcet and Benjamin Franklin were speculating about a possible
application of the (young) medical science to the extension of human life.
Finally Darwin said that “it becomes probable that Humanity, as we know
it now, would not still reached its final state of evolution but more likely
a phase of beginning”. 2
Julian Huxley3 (a brother of Aldous) was the first to use the word
“Transhuman” (in 1957) to describe “a man who remains a man but transcends
1
Discours de la dignité de l’homme, Pic de la Mirandole — 1486, Trad. Yves Hersant,
Paris, 1993.
2
“A history of transhumanist thought”, Nick Boström, Journal of Evolution and
Technology, 14(1), 1–25, 2005.
3
“Transhumanism”, Julian Huxley, 1957. See: http://sniadecki.wordpress.com/2015/01/21/
huxley-transhumanisme/ (in French)
himself by deploying new possibles to and for his human nature”. In his mind
that means to improve the performance of individuals through eugenics.
The current meaning of the word originated in 1980 when American
futurologists began to give a structure to the transhumanist movement.
They emphasized hybridized humans that would be given such capacities
as to be qualified as posthumans.2
4
http://humanityplus.org/philosophy/transhumanist-faq/
5
Our Posthuman Future: Consequence of the Biotechnology Revolution, Francis
Fukuyama, Farrar, Strauss & Giroux, New York, 2002.
6
“When will computer hardware match the human brain?”, Hans Moravec, Journal of
Evolution and Technology,” Vol. 1, 1998.
7
“Humanity, the remix”, Alyssa Ford, Utne, May, June 2005.
8
http://hplusmagazine.com/
Alvin Toeffler became a worldwide bestseller9 and has sold over 6 million
copies. With some 50 years of hindsight, one uncovers previsions that had
been deadlocks; some were successful but, as a matter of fact we did not
yet discover the current avenues which have escaped predictions but
finally came out on top.
These gurus do not belong to any kinds of sect. They aim at teaching
pragmatic working methods and propose new perspectives to economic or
industrial executives of all disciplines in order to anticipate future oppor-
tunities of the world economy since business is business!
The stage preceding the avalanche of discoveries was the transistor,
only 60 years ago. The electron was tamed using a specific technology
that will allow it to perform marvels of acrobatics which will shake our
lives. The computer will become part of our activities with the Internet
and many other implications which have a direct impact on our behavior.
This revolution was triggered by three “inconspicuous” researchers at
Bell Labs: William Shockley, John Bardeen, and Walter Brattain in 1947.
Never did they imagine for a second then that they would that soon upset
the world but they did. However, they never received the public fame they
deserved even though they were awarded the prestigious Nobel Prize in
1956. Their discovery of the “transistor effect” was too technical to be
appreciated by the average citizen.
After the initial highlight of this experimental breakthrough it took
some ten years of maturation and technical developments to obtain the
first operational transistor and turn it into a real industrial product. The
original components were the size of a moth equipped with three electrical
wires. That was rather rough but worked confidently enough to give rise
immediately to applications. This subject shall be considered again later
in detail.
The first radio receiver10 fully equipped with these solid state compo-
nents was commercially available in 1954. At that time, the transistor was
made of a little bar taken out of a Germanium crystal and equipped with
three electrodes. This was quite cumbersome (compared to the current
9
Future Shock, Alvin Toeffler, Bantam Book, 1970.
10
“Regency TR-1” produced by Texas Instruments (Dallas) and Industrial Development
Engineering Associates (Indianapolis).
11
Personal Computer.
12
With this Micral we were able, with Dr Michel Castagné, to perform the first computer
driven laboratory experiences.
Man applauds the coming of scientific progresses; is that for his own
interest or for reaching an ultimate step of the Darwinian evolution of the
species? What is plain is that seismic shifts (for good or ill) should inevi-
tably come in a not-so- remote future. Whether we like it or not, they are
coming and we shall accept them. So how far may transhumanists be
involved in that forecasting?
Nevertheless, the Grand Chief Guru of forward thinking, Ray
Kurzweil13 (economist, philosopher, software specialist, businessman,
and so on) foresees a near “Singularity” to come. This word is defined in
mathematical language as “a sharp and irreversible rupture in a continu-
ous process”. This singularity would correspond to a sudden mutation in
our ways of life and of our deep being, to come in the middle of this cen-
tury. This could be considered as a rather schematic view; it would be
more likely that a series of singularities would come, each coming from a
decisive and specialized breakthrough.
Now let us come back to Cro-Magnon discovering the benefits of
fire in a cave. Such an improvement in his living standards was the first
diversion from the pure biological program initially provided by Nature
for animals. As a consequence, the life expectation began to slightly
extend and this was a real bonus for the time delay dedicated to repro-
duction. Hopefully Man benefits from a rather extensive period for
reproduction. So the population was able to grow and counteracted for
the first time the natural laws by, then, adapting the environment to the
species.
During these rough primitive times child mortality was severe and
selection was merciless. This was a natural pledge for a favored genomic
evolution toward the more adapted species. So the reproduction rhythm
had to be especially fast in order to energetically “shuffle the cards”.
Today, the healthcare available for babies has inhibited such a
genomic filter. Deviations can freely propagate albeit the more severe
ones can be prevented by a careful early detection. This is a way to
reconcile with the prescriptions of Nature. Nevertheless the “genetical
13
Some do not hesitate to call him a “high level charlatan”. However he has been hired by
Google to head the Department of Research and Evaluation which assesses projects of the
future. That is certainly not for nothing.
filter” does not work as initially intended, so generating in the long run
a “pollution” of our global genetic heritage. Hopefully such a drift is
very slow.
14
Contrary to popular belief CRISPR was not born in Bethlehem but in Berkeley in 2012
from the work of Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna.
15
First trials were already undertaken, the first time on sheep, but more recently a couple
of twin sisters were born in China using genetically modified gametes to prevent any risk
of being contaminated by the HIV virus. This is a very first step.
16
The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, God and the Resurrection of the Dead,
Frank G Tipler, New York: Double Day, 1994.
17
That makes reference to a “charismatic operating system” !
own biological nature. Is God (Nature) to still let it go and not care? Some
have said that believing in God changes the brain. By extension, would
this mean that if God is to be rubbed out of our minds this would cause us
to revert to a previous state? As Voltaire put it, “Man invented God, not
the opposite”.
It is worth noting that any new religion to emerge since Islam18 did so
some millennium and a half ago. Does this mean that our inventiveness
concerning the idea of God is less and less essential and we have to be
satisfied with the present beliefs? To be convinced now people would
require more compelling arguments and stronger evidence than in the
Middle Ages (although people always deeply need to be comforted).
Religions are silent (all of them). We have entered a new knowledge
age which brings us sophisticated opportunities to challenge still more the
natural order and, inexorably, changes will come. Is there a destiny behind?
Would we have to get through a “Singularity” as transhumanists suggest?
For some time attempts were developed to explain religious experi-
ence and behavior in neuroscientific terms and correlate neural phenom-
ena with experiences of spirituality. Aldous Huxley was the first to use the
term of neurotheology which was intended to refer to a pseudo-science
devoted to a “cognitive neuroscience” of religious experience and spiritu-
ality in a scientific or philosophical context. This was quite unclear until
Laurence McKinney published the first book19 on the subject in 1994.
According to McKinney’s theory, pre-frontal development, in humans,
creates an illusion of chronological time as a fundamental part of normal
adult cognition past the age of three. The inability of the adult brain to
retrieve earlier images experienced by an infantile brain creates questions
such as “Where did I come from?” and “Where does it all go?”, which
McKinney suggests led to the creation of various religious explanations.
This leads to a reinterpretation of religion based on current neuroscientific
research. Some scientists working in the field hypothesize that the basis
of spiritual experience arises in neurological physiology.
18
Only sects were proposed, but they have not gathered enough traction for purpose of
discussion.
19
Neurotheology: Virtual Religion in the 21st Century, Laurence O McKinney, The
American Institute for Mindfulness, 1994.
All of these efforts still remain quite messy in spite of many experi-
mental attempts to evidence a neurophysiological effect by magnetic
stimulation, fMRI neuroimaging or psychoactive ingredients. However,
this evidently contributes to the field of transhumanism.
20
Nanotechnologies, Biotechnologies, Information, Cognitive Sciences.
21
Homo Deus, Yuval Noah Harari, Harwill Secker, London, 2015.
Deus”? Transhumanists are not alone in dealing with these issues. Teilhard
de Chardin was fascinated by the emerging technologies of the computers
and foresaw that they could lead us to a new stage of consciousness. He
said, in 1950, in his premonitory essay,22 that an “ultra-humanity” was
coming and “that without deep changes, religion is to fade away in the
night”. The incredible grip of religions on the minds of men will become
less and less effective due to extensive information.
Transhumanism is well aware of these issues, namely the relationship
between religion and present scientific requirements. Even Christopher
Benek23 proclaimed himself a transhumanist pastor to promote a common
bond between faith and technology. He says (take a deep breath): “In my
opinion, the word “artificial” is a misleading and a somewhat unhelpful term.
It implies that humanity is the only form of intelligence. We know this is not
the case. But my short answer, if we are talking about autonomous, strong
AI, is yes … because from a theological perspective, we are God’s AI.”
Now would AI artifacts improve man’s intelligence as machines
empowered his strength? Serguei Brin (from Google X Lab) foresees: “we
will make machines that can reason, think and do things better than we can”
whereas the Israelian mathematician Doron Zeilberger adds that “the logic
of the computer is to surpass our conceptual understanding”. That’s a lot! As
a matter of fact the Delph temple carved inscription “Man, know thyself and
you will know the Universe and the Gods” is more than ever on the agenda.
The question of God versus machine was at the origin of a stream of
unfounded and unfinished discussions until now. Ray Kurzweil24 dis-
cussed this profoundly without reaching any firm conclusion. Would
neurons be pure machines or is their organization more subtle? Dembski25
agrees that they need “extra material factors” whereas Jay Richards26 asks
22
La place de l’Homme dans la Nature, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Albin Michel, Paris,
1956.
23
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-digital-self/201705/the-pastor-who-found-
god-in-technology
24
Kurzweil, Singularity, p. 477.
25
The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities, William
Dembski, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
26
Are We Spiritual Machines?: Ray Kurzweil vs. the Critics of Strong A.I., George F.
Filder, Ray Kurzweil, and Jay W. Richards, Discovery Institute, 2001.
27
Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden, Grégor Mendel, Verhandlun-gen des naturforschenden
Vereines, Brunn, 1866.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com