CVC Barometer France 2025
CVC Barometer France 2025
FRANCE
20
TABLE OF CONTENTS
01 04
Scope of the Barometer Partnership &
Governance Challenges
02 05
CVC Profiles Executive Sponsorship
03 06
2024 Dynamics Valuation &
Performance Metrics
CONTRIBUTING CVCS
TO THE BAROMETER
Transportation
Real Estate
Mass Retail
WAVES OF CREATION
THROUGHOUT THE LAST 15 YEARS
When looking at the respondants launch year, Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) has emerged
through three distinct waves of creation.
Early pioneers before 2015 established initial models including Aliad (Air Liquide), Engie
New Ventures, MAIF Avenir and ViaID (Mobivia).
Followed by a significant surge between 2015-2020 (representing 63% of current
CVCs) including ADP Invest, Construction Venture (Bouygues), CMA CGM Ventures,
Banque des Territoires (Caisse des Dépôts), Capgemini Ventures, EDF Pulse, FDJ Gaming
Solutions, Léonard (VINCI), Macif Innovation, Nova (Saint-Gobain), Orange Ventures, RATP
Solutions Ville, Schneider Electric, Société Générale, Sopra Steria Innovation and Urban
Odyssey (ICADE).
Recent entrants since 2021, including Dastore (Carrefour through Daphni), GTT Strategic
Ventures, Orano (through Supernova), Opella (ex-Sanofi), and Stellantis Ventures,
continue to expand the ecosystem.
CVCs launch year
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Hybrid
Strategic
Financial
Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) models are primarily driven by strategic goals. Our research
shows that 56% of companies focus on ventures that align closely with their core business,
exploring new technologies and long-term innovation opportunities.
Another 36% of CVCs take a balanced approach, mixing financial returns with strategic
objectives. These hybrid models aim to create value beyond pure monetary gains.
Only 8% of CVCs operate like traditional venture capital, prioritizing financial returns.
The data clearly indicates that most companies view venture investments as a strategic
tool for growth and innovation, rather than just a financial opportunity.
Assets under management (AUM) reveal a balanced distribution, with approximately half of
CVCs managing funds under €100 million and the other half exceeding this threshold. This
AUM variation directly correlates with team sizes, where roughly 50% of CVCs operate with
teams of fewer than 5 people.
Independence levels show a clear trend: two-thirds of CVCs are fully integrated within their
parent companies. The only truly independent CVCs are those with a purely financial
investment focus.
68% 28%
50% 48%
40%
30%
22%
20% 17%
10% 9%
4%
0%
<25M€ 25-50M€ 50-100M€ 100-500M€ >500M€
CVCs firms primarily target their investments at Seed and Series A funding rounds. These
stages are crucial for startups as they work to validate their product-market fit or accelerate
growth, making collaboration with established companies particularly valuable.
The investment amounts from CVCs can vary widely, ranging from €50,000 to €30 million.
However, the average sweet spot investment tends to be around €3 million. This range
allows CVCs to support startups at different stages of development and with varying capital
needs.
50%
41%
40%
3 M€
Average
30% sweet
30% spot
20% 18%
10% 50 K€ 30 M€
7%
4%
0%
Pre-Seed Seed Serie A Serie B Serie C
Market dynamics reveal a nuanced performance landscape in 2024. 61% of the surveyed
firms perceive a market slowdown, while the remaining 39% report no significant changes.
In some instances, the perceived market challenges are linked to internal corporate
dynamics. These include focused efforts on cost reduction, operational efficiency
improvements, and ongoing leadership transitions. Such internal factors significantly
influence how CVCs interpret and respond to current market conditions.
Increase
28%
Yes No
61% 39% No change
56%
Reduction
16%
Our research shows that 50% of CVCs actively seek to establish a business case prior to
committing funds.
The level of definition for these business cases varies widely among corporates. Some CVCs
rely on intuitive assessments of potential synergies or strategic fit. Others pursue more
formalized approaches, such as signed Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) with
specific business units. In some cases, CVCs even conduct Proof of Concepts (POCs) to
validate the potential value of the investment.
Yes No
50% 50%
41%
36%
9% 9%
5%
1 2 3 4 5
Responses indicate a strong appreciation for partnerships between corporates and portfolio
startups, reflected in a 4 out of 5 rating that underscores their potential value. Many
respondents recognize that these collaborations drive significant value.
Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) firms typically employ one of three governance models:
The prevalent board member oversight model risks leaving critical partnership opportunities
unexplored, potentially constraining innovation and mutual growth.
Governance models
CYCLICAL CHALLENGES IN
SECURING TOP MANAGEMENT
SPONSORSHIP
52%
36%
8%
4%
0%
1 2 3 4 5
However, some CVC professionals note that top management does not fully grasp the
nuances of CVC goals. This can sometimes lead to an overemphasis on certain
performance indicators, particularly financial metrics, which may not fully capture the
broader strategic impact of CVC initiatives.
INVESTMENT THESIS
ARE PRETTY STABLE
The investment thesis is generally reviewed every 1 to 3 years but rarely knows stumbling
change.
In most cases, it is directly linked to the company’s core business or aligned with the
group’s long-term strategy. This approach ensures that investments remain in line with
strategic priorities and growth objectives, while also adapting to market changes and internal
needs.
Never
For new 5% 5% Semi-annually
5%
technologies
26%
Every 3 years
59%
Annually
Agnostic
Environmental
impact & biodiversity Energy transition
Digital Aligned with Fintech
FOLLOW-ON STRATEGIES
CORRELATE WITH THE CVC MODEL
This distinction highlights a clear correlation between CVC type and follow-on strategy:
strategic CVCs tend to align their follow-on investments with potential synergies, while
financial CVCs prioritize financial metrics in their decision-making process.
Yes No
64% 36%
CVCs having already considered In most cases, CVC funds are not interested in
partial or total sale of their portfolio
selling part of their portfolio and have never
considered it.
Yes No
48% 52%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Years
Most CVCs do not set specific liquidity goals, typically maintaining an average holding period
of 5 to 7 years for their investments. However, current market dynamics are leading some
CVCs to extend these holding periods.
In terms of exit strategies, CVCs employ a diversified approach that includes options such as
initial public offerings (IPOs), industrial exits, secondary opportunities, and acquisitions
by growth funds. This variety in exit strategies enables CVCs to adapt to different market
conditions and maximize the value of their investments, even as they navigate longer
detention periods.
ROI 20%
Business generated 17%
Business synergies 17%
# of Collaborations 10%
# of Investments or Acquisitions 8%
ESG & Carbon footprint 6%
Brand recognition 4%
# of Test or POCs 4%
Expertise generated 4%
Participatation valuation 4%
Cashburn 2%
# of Events 2%
Parity 2%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
The KPIs for evaluating Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) performance encompass a range of
financial, strategic, and operational metrics.
The primary focus remains on financial performance and business impact, with Return on
Investment (ROI) and business generated serving as key indicators.
Collaboration and business synergies are also highly prioritized, reflecting the importance of
strategic partnerships and the high percentage of CVCs that identify as strategic.
Additionally, the inclusion of carbon footprint as a KPI indicates an emerging commitment to
sustainability.
However, despite the intention to track these diverse impacts, CVCs often lack clarity in
how they measure and report on these metrics.
Comparables 33%
Yes No
56% 44%
Multiples 20%
DCF 17%
Yes No
83% 17%
Others 10%
The most used valuation methodologies include comparables, multiples, last round valuation
and Discounted Cash Flow. Other methods, such as VNC or VC valuation methods, are
marginally used.
Many funds rely on external consultants, particularly for due diligence or when evaluating new
technologies, to ensure an accurate and reliable valuation process. Additionally, in most
cases, portfolio valuations are audited and validated by the statutory auditors of the CVC.
Robust governance
structures
Build a strong and positive image around the CVC and its
alignment with the company’s objectives
Create a standardized document to communicate CVC
updates, strategy and outcomes to stakeholders at all levels
Born from Aster Capital, a pioneering European climate tech fund with 25+
years of expertise, we’ve spent decades shaping industrial transformation.
With deep industrial ties, we drive rapid, outcome-focused change that
delivers lasting impact.
Want to know more about our support or be part of our next CVC
Barometer edition? Contact us at ‘[email protected]’.
Marie Capdeville
Senior Consultant
[email protected]
Iris Follenfant
Consultant
[email protected]
Marie Capdeville
Senior Consultant
[email protected]
Iris Follenfant
Consultant
[email protected]
20
25