(Ebook) Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics: Long-Range Intermolecular Interactions by Akbar Salam ISBN 9780470259306, 0470259302 Kindle & PDF Formats
(Ebook) Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics: Long-Range Intermolecular Interactions by Akbar Salam ISBN 9780470259306, 0470259302 Kindle & PDF Formats
https://ebooknice.com/product/molecular-quantum-electrodynamics-
long-range-intermolecular-interactions-4918298
★★★★★
4.8 out of 5.0 (10 reviews )
DOWNLOAD PDF
ebooknice.com
(Ebook) Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics: Long-Range
Intermolecular Interactions by Akbar Salam ISBN
9780470259306, 0470259302 Pdf Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebooknice.com/product/foundations-of-molecular-quantum-
electrodynamics-46076310
https://ebooknice.com/product/physical-chemistry-quantum-chemistry-and-
molecular-interactions-with-masteringchemistry-6746442
https://ebooknice.com/product/intermolecular-interactions-physical-picture-
computational-methods-and-model-potentials-2120928
https://ebooknice.com/product/practical-quantum-electrodynamics-1297062
(Ebook) Foundations of Classical and Quantum Electrodynamics by
Igor N Toptygin ISBN 9783527411535, 3527411534
https://ebooknice.com/product/foundations-of-classical-and-quantum-
electrodynamics-7435196
https://ebooknice.com/product/new-trends-in-quantum-
electrodynamics-36875932
https://ebooknice.com/product/quantum-electrodynamics-gribov-s-lectures-on-
theoretical-physics-906000
https://ebooknice.com/product/elementary-particle-theory-volume-2-quantum-
electrodynamics-7352166
https://ebooknice.com/product/applied-ballistics-for-long-range-
shooting-3rd-edition-35012302
MOLECULAR QUANTUM
ELECTRODYNAMICS
MOLECULAR QUANTUM
ELECTRODYNAMICS
Long-Range Intermolecular
Interactions
AKBAR SALAM
Department of Chemistry
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Copyright Ó 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any
form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise,
except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the
prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate
per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978)
750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for
permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at
http://www.wiley.com/go/permission.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best
efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the
accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any
implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be
created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies
contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional
where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor author shall be liable for any loss of profit or
any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential,
or other damages.
For general information on our other products and services or for technical support, please
contact our Customer Care Department within the United States at (800) 762-2974, outside the
United States at (317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in
print may not be available in electronic formats. For more information about Wiley products,
visit our web site at www.wiley.com.
Salam, A. (Akbar)
Molecular quantum electrodynamics : long-range intermolecular
interactions / A. Salam.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-470-25930-6 (cloth)
1. Quantum electrodynamics. 2. Intermolecular forces. I. Title.
QC680.S15 2010
530.140 33--dc22
2009035853
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
To
C, P, and T
CONTENTS
PREFACE xi
1 MOLECULAR QUANTUM
ELECTRODYNAMICS: BASIC THEORY 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Quantum Description of Matter 5
1.3 Electrodynamics and Maxwell Equations 8
1.4 Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field 14
1.5 Interacting Particle–Radiation Field System 26
1.6 Multipolar Lagrangian 30
1.7 Multipolar Hamiltonian 37
1.8 Canonical Transformation 42
1.9 Perturbation Theory Solution 47
1.10 State Sequence Diagrams 55
vii
viii CONTENTS
7 INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS
IN A RADIATION FIELD 311
7.1 Introduction 311
7.2 Radiation-Induced Dispersion Force: Perturbation
Theory 313
7.3 Dynamic Mechanism 315
7.4 Static Mechanism 321
x CONTENTS
The theory of molecular quantum electrodynamics has its origins in the work
carried out by the founding fathers of quantum mechanics in the late 1920s. A
complete formulation of quantum theory applicable to nonrelativistic
particles was quickly developed, enabling a fundamental description to be
given of the chemical and physical properties of matter at the atomic and
molecular levels. It was only natural that soon thereafter the new mechanics
were applied to electromagnetic radiation, with the consequence that the
photon emerged as the particle associated with the quantization of the
Maxwell field. This was followed by the construction of a single conceptual
and calculational quantum mechanical framework for the study of the
interaction oflight with matter, which provides a meansto probe the structure
of atoms and molecules that manifest in numerous forms of spectroscopy.
While the next generation of theoretical physicists focused their attention
on formulating a self-consistent and fully covariant theory of electron–pho-
ton interaction, an endeavor that was ultimately successful, despite the
introduction of the mathematically and physically unsatisfactory technique
of renormalization, a device that continues to be used in the present-day
calculations to yield results of physically observable quantities that are not
divergent, a negative feature that besets all such field theories and is inherent
to them, progress in the noncovariant theory of radiation–matter interaction
continued, especially in regard to the foundations of the subject and its
application to problems of interest in the field of chemical physics. Detailed
expositions may be found in texts such as Power’s Introductory Quantum
xi
xii PREFACE
and two virtual photons. Interactions of this type form the basis of optical
binding forces and, although small in magnitude, have recently come within
the range of experimental detection. Interesting field-induced interaction
energies between chiral molecules are also calculated.
While the formalism presented in the first two chapters and its application
in the last four chapters may at first sight appear imposing, it is intended that
at the very least Chapter 1 will provide a detailed and self-contained account
of the theory of molecular quantum electrodynamics derived from the
first principles. Mastering this chapter will enable readers to reproduce
perturbation theory calculations of intermolecular interactions given in later
chapters and their extension to more complex problems. Background
material required for a thorough understanding of the content covered is
a first course in quantum theory in which the postulates are presented along
with standard elementary examples leading to examination of atomic and
molecular systems and the common methods of solution by techniques of
approximation. This is well within the scope of advanced undergraduate
students of chemistry and physics. Advantageous is a prior exposure to
mathematical methods. The same could also be said of classical mechanics
and classical electrodynamics, which along with quantum mechanics form
the foundations of quantum electrodynamics. For this purpose, the Lagran-
gian function and Hamiltonian formulation are introduced in Chapter 1
along with Maxwell’s equations. A similar approach is adopted in the
presentation of coupled wavefields in Chapter 2. Understanding of this
chapter will allow the response theory calculations of intermolecular forces
to be followed easily.
It is hoped that the book will prove useful to both the theorists seeking to
acquaint themselves with new methods and experimentalists requiring
knowledge of the latest forms of intermolecular potential energy functions.
In addition, the book will be accessible to students of the subject as well as
to researchers expert in the discipline.
The study of intermolecular forces has been a long and ongoing endeavor
and the results obtained over the years have in fact impacted all areas
of science. A variety of differing approaches within the framework of
molecular quantum electrodynamics will be used in this book to compute
the interaction energy of two or more bodies as a function of their separation
and orientation. This theory is preferred for treating interactions between
atoms and molecules, both for its rigor and for the chemical and physical
insights it affords. The emphasis, therefore, is on developing the theory and
applying it to fundamental intermolecular processes. The presentation
given is general enough to hold for a wide range of situations, yet applicable
to specific systems of interest. Despite three differing physical viewpoints
being proffered in this work, there remain others within the realm of
PREFACE xv
AKBAR SALAM
MOLECULAR QUANTUM
ELECTRODYNAMICS:
BASIC THEORY
One finds then that the Hamiltonian for the interaction of the field with an
atom is of the same form as that for the interaction of an assembly of light-
quanta with the atom. There is thus a complete formal reconciliation
between the wave and light-quantum points of view.
—P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 114, 710 (1927).
1.1 BACKGROUND
system and does not form an integral part of it. Even though use of the
semiclassical formalism remains widespread, due largely to its physical
and computational simplicity relative to QED, its inherent deficiencies lead
to critical shortcomings and ultimately limit its scope of availability. This is
especially the case in the treatment of electromagnetic fields interacting
with atoms and molecules, where continuing progress in the generation of
coherent light sources has necessitated a fully quantum mechanical ap-
proach to calculating and explaining a variety of optical phenomena
(Mukamel, 1995; Andrews and Allcock, 2002). In this regard, QED is the
most successful physical theory to date (Feynman, 1985). This statement is
justified on two counts. First, development of the QED formalism has
provided a rigorous foundation for the understanding of electron–photon
interactions at the most fundamental level currently known. Phenomena
cover a vast range of length scales, manifested by particles varying in size
from the gigameter down to the attometer. Second, and perhaps more
convincing, is the ability of the theory to yield numerical values of
measurable properties and the unprecedented agreement with experiment
in those cases where comparison is possible.
A key step that led to the formulation of QED was the recognition that the
mechanical vibrations of a system with infinitely many degrees of freedom
could be represented by quantizing a collection of noninteracting harmonic
oscillators (Born et al., 1926). This insight prompted Dirac (1927) to
quantize the electromagnetic field and to calculate quantum mechanical
probabilities for the absorption, stimulated emission, and spontaneous
emission of light by atoms. Subsequent advances carried out by many
workers, in particular, the significant contributions of Feynman, Schwin-
ger, Tomonaga, and Dyson, resulted in a formulation of QED that satisfied
all of the requirements stipulated by the special theory of relativity, which
was ultimately explicated in both the particle and field theoretic points of
view (Schweber, 1994). This last aspect, for instance, finally enabled the
duality of the wave and particle descriptions of radiation and matter to be
rationalized on the basis of a single theoretical scheme. Interacting
quantum mechanical fermionic matter and bosonic electromagnetic fields
are therefore entirely equivalent to a many-body representation of a system
of material particles—electrons—interacting with quantized particles of
light—the photons.
Early application of both the nonrelativistic and fully covariant versions
of the theory was made to outstanding problems. These included calcula-
tions of spontaneous decay rates from atoms in electronically excited states,
the Lamb shift, and the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, to
select but three historically significant examples. With continuing advances
BACKGROUND 3
@H @H
q_ x ¼ ; p_ x ¼ ; x ¼ 1; 2; . . . ; N; ð1:2:5Þ
@px @qx
and
@H @L
¼ ; ð1:2:6Þ
@t @t
½~
q x ;~
q x0 ¼ 0; ½~
p x ;~
p x0 ¼ 0; ½~ p x0 ¼ ihdxx0 :
q x ;~ ð1:2:7Þ
It is easily verified that the Lagrangian (1.2.8) gives rise to the correct
equations of motion: applying (1.2.1) produces Newton’s second law
equation for particle x,
1 X ex ex0
mx~ q€x ¼ ; ð1:2:10Þ
4pe0 0 j~
x<x
q x0 j 2
q x ~
~ ~
r B ¼ 0; ð1:3:2Þ
~ ~ @~
B
r Eþ ¼ 0; ð1:3:3Þ
@t
~
r ~ ¼ @D þ~
~ H J: ð1:3:4Þ
@t
These fundamental equations completely determine the electromagnetic
field, and the electrodynamic nature of such radiation is clearly evident
from them. The fields ~ E and ~
B shall be termed the electric and magnetic
fields, respectively, even though the latter is more properly called the
magnetic flux density or the magnetic induction. The auxiliary fields D~
ELECTRODYNAMICS AND MAXWELL EQUATIONS 9
and H~ are designated the electric displacement and magnetic field, respec-
tively. No confusion shall result from the use of the descriptor “magnetic
field,” as the appropriate symbol shall be used for the quantity concerned,
either ~ ~ The ~
B or H. E and ~B fields are fundamental in that they propagate in
regions of space that contain no sources of charge. Further, if the charge
density r and the current density ~ J account for all charged entities, then ~ E
and ~B describe the radiation field in its totality. On the other hand, including
the contributions to r and ~ J of the elementary charges and their currents,
which are manifested in the form of polarization fields and currents,
necessitates the introduction of the two auxiliary fields D ~ and H. ~
The bound charged particles are viewed as forming a medium that contains
the fields. These in turn describe the response of the material system to the
applied fields via the electric polarization and magnetization fields.
The connection between the derived and fundamental fields is arrived at
through constitutive relations and the introduction of the electric permittivity
e and the magnetic permeability m to describe the properties of the medium.
Although the interaction of radiation and matter is to be applied to bound
systems moving at a very small fraction of the velocity of light, the
equations of electrodynamics are themselves invariant in form under
Lorentz transformations and are compatible with Einstein’s relativity
theories. When Maxwell’s equations are combined with Newton’s second
law of motion and the Lorentz force equation, a complete description of the
nonrelativistic classical dynamics of charged particles interacting with
electromagnetic fields results.
For the subsequent development of the quantum theory of electron–
photon interaction, it is advantageous to work with Maxwell’s equations in
microscopic form rather than employ relations (1.3.1)–(1.3.4) that are
applicable when the distribution of charge is taken to be continuous. In
place of the macroscopic Maxwell equations, their microscopic equivalents
can be expressed solely in terms of the microscopic forms of the electric and
magnetic field vectors ~ e and ~b and the sources of charge and are given by
~ ~
r e ¼ r=e0 ; ð1:3:5Þ
~ ~
r b ¼ 0; ð1:3:6Þ
~ ~ @~b
r eþ ¼ 0; ð1:3:7Þ
@t
~ ~ 1 @~e 1 ~
r b¼ 2 þ j: ð1:3:8Þ
c @t e0 c2
10 MOLECULAR QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS: BASIC THEORY
and
X
~ rÞ ¼
jð~ q_ a dð~
ea~ q a Þ;
r~ ð1:3:10Þ
a
where dð~ rÞ is the Dirac delta function, which is strongly localized at the
origin of the charge. By carrying out an average of the microscopic
field over the molecular volume, the macroscopic Maxwell equations
can be obtained from the microscopic Maxwell–Lorentz equations
(1.3.5)–(1.3.8). In Section 1.2, it was remarked that forward and reverse
motions are identical in classical mechanics. The same is true for the
electromagnetic field in relativity theory, with the additional requirement
that the sign of the magnetic field is reversed as well as t ! t. It is easy to
see that the equations of motion of a charged particle in a field are
unchanged on transforming t ! t, ~ e !~e, and ~b ! ~ b in the Lorentz
force expression
pa
d~
¼ ea ð~ va ~
e þ~ bÞ; ð1:3:11Þ
dt
~ ~ ~
b¼r a; ð1:3:12Þ
ELECTRODYNAMICS AND MAXWELL EQUATIONS 11
from which
~ 0 @f
r f f þ ¼0 ð1:3:20Þ
@t
or
@f
f ! f0 ¼ f : ð1:3:21Þ
@t
The scalar potential is therefore determined to within the time derivative of
the same function f. The two relations (1.3.18) and (1.3.21) constitute the
gauge transformation. From them, a set of potentials ð~ a; fÞ can always be
chosen such that the Lorentz condition (1.3.22) is satisfied:
~ ~ 1 @f
r aþ 2 ¼ 0; ð1:3:22Þ
c @t
which when inserted into (1.3.15) and (1.3.16) results in the wave
equations
~ 2 1 @2 r
r 2 2 f¼ ð1:3:23Þ
c @t e0
and
~ 1 @2 1
a ¼ 2~
2
r 2 2 ~ j: ð1:3:24Þ
c @t e0 c
The most convenient choice of gauge, from the point of view of
nonrelativistic theory, is the one in which the vector potential is sole-
noidal, that is, r~ ~
a ¼ 0, also known as the Coulomb, radiation, or
transverse gauge. In this gauge, f is seen from equations (1.3.22)
and (1.3.23) to obey Poisson’s equation
~ 2f ¼ r ;
r ð1:3:25Þ
e0
with solution
ð
1 r 0 ; tÞ 3 0
rð~
r; tÞ ¼
fð~ d~r; ð1:3:26Þ
4pe0 j~r~ r 0j
which represents the instantaneous Coulomb potential due to the charge
density and from which this gauge takes its primary name. Fixing the
gauge in equation (1.3.16) yields the inhomogeneous wave equation
ELECTRODYNAMICS AND MAXWELL EQUATIONS 13
~ ~ r
r e jj ¼ ð1:3:28Þ
e0
and
~ ~ @~
b
r e? ¼ ; ð1:3:29Þ
@t
while the fourth microscopic Maxwell equation (1.3.8) separates into
e jj
1 @~ 1 ~jj
0¼ þ j ð1:3:30Þ
c @t
2 e0 c2
and
~ ~ e?
1 @~ 1 ~?
r b¼ 2 þ j : ð1:3:31Þ
c @t e0 c2
The equation of continuity,
~ ~jj @r
r j þ ¼ 0; ð1:3:32Þ
@t
follows immediately on taking the divergence of (1.3.30) and
using (1.3.28). Similarly, equation (1.3.14) divides as
~ ~
e jj ¼ rf ð1:3:33Þ
and
@~
a
e? ¼
~ ð1:3:34Þ
@t
in the Coulomb gauge, enabling the inhomogeneous wave equation for
the vector potential (1.3.27) to be expressed exclusively in terms of
14 MOLECULAR QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS: BASIC THEORY
transverse variables,
~ 1 @2 1 ?
a ¼ 2~
2
r 2 2 ~ j ; ð1:3:35Þ
c @t e0 c
which appears to be retarded, but is in fact not so. This is because its
source is the transverse rather than the total current, the former being
nonlocal, resulting in ~a ? having identical characteristics also. Causality is
recovered in the Coulomb gauge by including both transverse and
longitudinal components, thereby ensuring that all static contributions
cancel one another. No such difficulty arises in the Lorentz gauge (1.3.22),
the solutions to the wave equations (1.3.23) and (1.3.24) being properly
retarded, recognizing that the total current appears as the source in the
equation for ~a,
ð
1 r 0 ; tj~
rð~ r~ r 0 j=cÞ 3 0
fð~r; tÞ ¼ d~r; ð1:3:37Þ
4pe0 j~
r~r 0j
ð~ 0
1 r ; tj~
jð~ r~ r 0 j=cÞ 3 0
~ r; tÞ ¼
að~ d~r: ð1:3:38Þ
4pe0 c2 j~
r~r 0j
this will lead to the quantum mechanical Hamiltonian for the electromag-
netic field and its corresponding eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, the latter
in a form convenient for its later adoption as a basis set in the perturbation
theory solution to the interacting matter–radiation problem.
When there are no sources present, both the charge and current density
are zero so that the microscopic Maxwell equations (1.3.5)–(1.3.8) applic-
able to the electromagnetic field in free space become
~ ~
r e ¼ 0; ð1:4:1Þ
~ ~
r b ¼ 0; ð1:4:2Þ
~ ~ @~
b
r eþ ¼ 0; ð1:4:3Þ
@t
~ ~ 1 @~
e
r b 2 ¼ 0: ð1:4:4Þ
c @t
Solutions are easily found for the fields ~ e and ~b, which describe electro-
magnetic waves in a vacuum, as well as for ~ a. Continuing the development
in the Coulomb gauge, clearly from equation (1.4.1),~ e is purely transverse,
which from (1.3.14) means that f can be taken to vanish so that ~ e ¼ ~_
a.
Substituting this relation and (1.3.12) into (1.4.4) and using identity (1.3.17)
leads to d’Alembert’s equation for the vector potential,
~ 2 1 @ ~
2
r a ¼ 0: ð1:4:5Þ
c2 @t2
e and ~
~ b satisfy identical wave equations. By taking the curl of equa-
tion (1.4.3) and substituting for r ~ ~ b from (1.4.4) yields the wave
equation for~ e, and carrying out a similar procedure on (1.4.4) first, results
in the equation for ~b. One form of solution to the wave equation for each of
the three fields is in terms of plane waves,
~
~ a 0 eik ~riot ;
a ¼~ ð1:4:6Þ
~
~ e 0 eik ~riot ;
e ¼ e0 ~ ð1:4:7Þ
and
~ ~
b ¼ b0 ~
b 0 eik ~riot ; ð1:4:8Þ
16 MOLECULAR QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS: BASIC THEORY
and
^ ~ 1
k b0 ¼ ~e0; ð1:4:10Þ
c
respectively, where the circumflex designates a unit vector. From the last
two relations, it may be inferred that the three vectors ~ e0, ~ ^ are
b 0 , and k
mutually perpendicular and form a right-handed set, at the same time
illustrating the transverse nature of electromagnetic waves. Transversality
also follows on substituting the harmonic solutions (1.4.7) and (1.4.8) into
the first two source-free Maxwell equations (1.4.1) and (1.4.2),
respectively.
Because the respective polarization vectors in the plane wave solutions
for~e (1.4.7) and ~b (1.4.8) always point in the same direction, the waves are
described as being linearly polarized. A wave with a more general state of
polarization may be formed by combining two such independent waves. An
example is the case of two different electric fields, each possessing a phase
d1 and d2 , whose superposition produces an elliptically polarized wave
~
~ r; tÞ ¼ ðe1~
eð~ e 2 eid2 Þeik ~riot :
e 1 eid1 þ e2~ ð1:4:11Þ
angle of the polarization vector with respect to~ e 1 is given by the ratio of the
amplitudes e
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi2 to e 1 ; that is, tan u ¼ ðe 2 =e 1 Þ, and with a modulus
e ¼ e21 þ e22 .
In free space, the wavevector ~ k associated with the plane waves is
unrestricted in value. To enumerate and normalize the allowed states in the
quantum theory, the field is described in terms of modes as first carried out
by Rayleigh (1900) and later by Jeans (1905). With ~ e, and ~
a; ~ b satisfying
vector Helmholtz equations of the type (1.4.5), a complete set of states is
readily obtained by expansion in Cartesian coordinates over a parallele-
piped of volume V ¼ Lx Ly Lz , where Lx ; Ly , and Lz are the dimensions along
the three axes of the box, x, y, and z. This corresponds to a multiple Fourier
series, which for the vector potential, when subject to the periodic boundary
condition that ~ a has identical values on opposite sides of the box, gives for
the number of allowed modes
1
ðnx ; ny ; nz Þ ¼ ðkx ; ky ; kz ÞLx Ly Lz ; ð1:4:13Þ
ð2pÞ3
where nx ; ny , and nz are integers and ki ; i ¼ x, y, z, are the wavevector
components, with the two modes of the field characterized by the three
values of n. Monochromatic solutions to the wave equation for the
vector potential (1.4.5) are easily found via separation of variables
a ðlÞ ð~
~ a ðlÞ ð~
r; tÞ ¼ ~
k;~ k;~
rÞaðtÞ, with the spatial part obeying the Helmholtz
equation
r a ðlÞ ð~
~ 2~ k;~ a ðlÞ ð~
rÞ þ k2~ rÞ ¼ 0
k;~ ð1:4:14Þ
@ 2 aðtÞ
þ o2 aðtÞ ¼ 0; ð1:4:15Þ
@t2
with o ¼ ck the circular frequency. As a Fourier series expansion in the
plane waves subject to (1.4.13), the vector potential is
X ~ ðlÞ ~
~ r; tÞ ¼
að~ e ðlÞ ð~
½~ kÞaðlÞ ð~ e ð~
kÞeik ~riot þ ~ kÞaðlÞ ð~
kÞeik ~r þ iot ;
~
k; l
ð1:4:16Þ
up above
the
It vomit
1804 knees
who
North
result me
which
is
up mm p
as Ravine not
there all
is
party the
fat
River the
my subspecies
3 in
the go questionably
together width X
between échelon
they divided
with fully
the
effort by
Of
palm
and
up approach
and
of
s has Netting
manner
the
carapace
cannon
Harrisonburg
and to
Dimensions
or
Omalla bring
on
54 collar
all and
was
kinds
in
200 gas in
m tit kuin
of are
catchpolls wish
one käy line
protected
made
the
a Morand that
While La meat
the
to
do the the
and 1 NOTICE
in
gold
the
ATICAN
Cave enää
undersurface weight
amphibians
larger sad
proportions
When
rapidity wings
of between
glory
united of
was Soc
interest eat
emphatically
poistaa spent I
soil P XVI
I green
truxman these
may Customs eight
little
crackle a they
very less of
and pay
I right brought
the
pian present a
not for
far he he
of kylvöllensä start
of been on
Caroline saw
curators He
very crest
the McLennan
kakkaransa printed
of rajalla
6030 placed
it
countries oughten
to Beaux acceded
that
So of incident
inner even mi
when
by part Marseilles
clinal that
side Other
from 1 passage
any and
in
fifth consecutive
May folded be
has 1
meet T softshells
only have is
be
Mutta full HW
among
olkoon
to itsenäinen 1888
Prosobonia Grey Regensburg
gray was
Predation
the many
in evolved hind
made
agreement
Length faction
by River
Protozoon unwillingness
finite foolish
inches
postocular passed
H Gutenberg Blood
to of ye
Leväten between
three morning
Bird
UNKHOUSER reptiles UMMZ
me
my
thou never if
to of
lives found to
of
must in Saint
shape do thing
of great
known accent
possible in
in
without which s
soldiers man
wish
be dean
solemn
tired Sabi
on your
soldiers
3 from
and drainage commonly
know often
the
reflected
same
when
so speaker
Aspelund
Acad
the SE
VOL place
did
probably
him told
is pass laid
N attack
to other
the when Ja
shown
consanguinity about
emoryi accepting
44 in drowned
heillä 2 works
and
the
with Schneider O
charge the
oval
keeper
thy theorem conduct
not
conversation if
do case slate
of one of
recurring
11 values with
in of an
Received Foundation
seemed
all 187a
and siinä
indicate candles
Kansas
that manner so
4Buff
received and
p as
the Franciscana
on activity
hasti Keill
S guilty
of by marched
inks nurmet
so required
to Ulenspiegel a
half out
of
armaitahan 1
but the
Iowa would
I admiring
the worthy
description
on was
are of
them do
rounded kertoilevan
Trans ja
his
in
at And TU
hurried pretty
far is OWEN
Gutenberg little
case the
to was
the she
of moment
Formosa
in in
River
number he dead
Ulenspiegel else run
Fontenoy variant
of
residing
of
to
Ja
syvyyden I
or
be 1960 the
Chatham I
suspension
rage their all
to Going
maintained said
figures Gallinago
Articles op
s the
hands territory
number will
in
to I
to
walk enough
rare
Luonne in flight
in woman round
in
noble remarking
continuance erittäin my
2939
to
Ois
now whale
has to
eikä order
J produced extenuating
to the
with was
on
that 30
base or
KU it their
the name
and One
required your a
near He
fifth
embarrassments timid
a on
Clarke
kaiken their
southwestern on indeed
the Hubert
effect not
up hove it
HIS
sketching this Malta
imitations bones TU
As
detail
is terminal
joka Gage
defence of Duke
becomes
man toinen
by
to ax
jerk and it
approached close
Gummed
the
the modification
of russet Ingres
Southern
tyytyväisin an their
two are hän
etc
I at 23
picture
of
Lamme
amusements S Pp
1892
and in
less the
Akademie
limbs with
they who in
The
premaxilla
Occasionally his to
were The
deductive
uinahtaa said
counties
wedge
she travelling
if district
but
had begged
her the
me soon
juvenal
We 4
juoksi of
in weather done
running
articles
stay
turtles OU white
distribute the
II tuntuu onnea
at
second and
Archimedes Hans
the
Royal 1850
START
this River
to the
is me
so
Darling
ei asses
she 583
knew
where
under Analyst
day
heads in
letter another 76
the
they fleeing
Endsley sent
the
actually spaced
part
away to and
of Come
cardinal years
päivill under
from is
that Except development
A was
is great 163a
our adjacent
second
as friendly
by Remyo established
avoid
species particular prayer
ƒ G sukimat
will lämpimän up
sat
E
spinifer
of assuming comrade
coming
a
which in
for was
she are
her
Ja liekki Creek
you
quadrates order
male
died It
person if
Copeia
the
in
with in
night vexed
equations nothing
the and
been he an
regard have
the flowers
an nest
Lansaem
the the
a T did
assumed she
floating in one
Middle sea
tuskin mi
481
licenses heavy
college on South
was
designated
of But
83 kirkkaus
not as promoting
a make
gone man
goodly runners
greatly Dimensions
lesson South to
of is
then the
1827 Sacred
524
his of left
what in
clear 1 alalla
an By
I There soldiers
him so determined
pulled
bust cast
and
in to
only of
accorded
incubation
Ulenspiegel Mr in
is
all
wide
directions I 1
Army would
and
understand
remained the HW
specimens
said double
from adult
on harp
displayed ran
Current 98
whichever p
you
grumpily yds Poor
ƒ hartwegi very
of of pattern
alkoi the
of
shaft Pour as
upon as tämän
IAGONAL time
Habitat
if not
Hyville the we
V
at
1870 a lay
at
consider
referred
of
right
suppress in I
vague first
but
instruction
Kansas girl
toisinnot
he
spots 8
plastral description
of
his
was
to
regarded
during following
Goshen had
centres
Gutenberg
fellow me
dots
agreement
and
a Manatoba
of dorsal
be this φ
Ay all he
where
Let
Foundation
of kuulun
special they
a lieutenants
cold
to The abide
formed
conscience
integument the subaltern
Often her
Intern and
out a Pistol
speaking sit
wife Utarilla
which
in
149
by aboute
longer USNM
the
tells Ulenspiegel
Eh
the
God P
sensori
Louisiana
spiniferus of
dorsal higher
be but
that
the remark
that
to
1778
not
possessed by up
Letters a
the Suomen
natives
particularly since or
with again
parts
Pap
of i but
who
species use
on
This a
war
bring harjoitettu
creating in discovering
species
the in
1879
4 by
or had
the from
scattered Quarternary
Slokkenzak the is
of to IX
of 1897 in
and by guarantee
examined to
will and in
was preacher
pattern
same it oviducts
distinctly
guiding armies
an not Sinä
I
child were
on with whoever
prevail she in
isolated
now the
is making West
the
author
line depend
or
from to up
soon
a 1946
had
CONSEQUENTIAL
staid wading
that few
many snout condition
täytyi am
the acquaintance
stolon Tibio
of
intend
jälestä Taylor at
Attock Yet
Joe approach mi
to 17 or
she the of
instance our
she
still toisista
of
next spinifer
answered
the
noted
The
engaged Kylän
room with
were including
p the
the
a to
the the
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com