(Ebook) The Written Word in The Medieval Arabic Lands: A Social and Cultural History of Reading Practices by Konrad Hirschler ISBN 9780748654215, 0748654216 Available Any Format
(Ebook) The Written Word in The Medieval Arabic Lands: A Social and Cultural History of Reading Practices by Konrad Hirschler ISBN 9780748654215, 0748654216 Available Any Format
https://ebooknice.com/product/the-written-word-in-the-medieval-
arabic-lands-a-social-and-cultural-history-of-reading-
practices-51320448
★★★★★
4.8 out of 5.0 (42 reviews )
DOWNLOAD PDF
ebooknice.com
(Ebook) The Written Word in the Medieval Arabic Lands : A
Social and Cultural History of Reading Practices by Konrad
Hirschler ISBN 9780748654215, 0748654216 Pdf Download
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebooknice.com/product/social-and-cultural-history-of-the-
punjab-prehistoric-ancient-and-early-medieval-50729268
https://ebooknice.com/product/history-and-the-written-word-documents-
literacy-and-language-in-the-age-of-the-angevins-the-middle-ages-
series-33368050
https://ebooknice.com/product/making-agreements-in-medieval-catalonia-
power-order-and-the-written-word-1000-1200-1734486
https://ebooknice.com/product/history-of-the-arabic-written-tradition-
volume-1-5659076
(Ebook) Through the Negative: The Photographic Image and the Written
Word in Nineteenth-Century American Literature (Literary Criticism and
Cultural Theory) by Megan Williams ISBN 0415966736
https://ebooknice.com/product/through-the-negative-the-photographic-
image-and-the-written-word-in-nineteenth-century-american-literature-
literary-criticism-and-cultural-theory-2438680
https://ebooknice.com/product/in-the-lands-of-the-christians-arabic-
travel-writing-in-the-17th-century-10009454
https://ebooknice.com/product/arabic-today-a-student-business-and-
professional-course-in-spoken-and-written-arabic-5692480
https://ebooknice.com/product/dictatorship-as-experience-towards-a-
socio-cultural-history-of-the-gdr-7179856
https://ebooknice.com/product/a-cultural-history-of-animals-in-the-
medieval-age-50678472
HIRSCHLER_1.qxd 9/10/11 20:59 Page 1
Konrad Hirschler
book explores the growth of reading audiences in a pre-print culture.
Konrad Hirschler is Senior Lecturer in the History of the Near and Middle
East at SOAS, University of London. He is the author of Medieval Arabic
Historiography: Authors as Actors (2006) and co-editor of Manuscript Notes as a
Documentary Source (2011).
Jacket image: Abū Zayd in a school, from Maqāmāt by al-Harīrī © Bibliothèque nationale de France
www.euppublishing.com
Konrad Hirschler
THE WRITTEN WORD IN THE
MEDIEVAL ARABIC LANDS
Konrad Hirschler
A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library
List of Illustrations iv
List of Tables v
Acknowledgements vi
Introduction 1
1 Reading and Writerly Culture 11
2 A City is Reading: Popular and Scholarly Reading Sessions 32
3 Learning to Read: Popularisation and the Written Word in
Children’s Schools 82
4 Local Endowed Libraries and their Readers 124
5 Popular Reading Practices 164
Conclusion 197
Bibliography 202
Index 228
Figures
3.1 Floor plan: Jawhar al-Lālā (d. 842/1438) endowment with
school 107
3.2 Floor plan: Sultan Faraj b. Barqūq endowment with school
(812/1409) 108
3.3 Floor plan: Asanbughā (d. 777/1375–6) endowment with
school 109
Plates
Situated between pages 90 and 91
1 Ashrafīya inventory (mid-7th/13th century)
2 Abū Zayd in the children’s school (619/1220?, Syria?)
3 Abū Zayd in the children’s school (634/1237)
3a Slate with first letters of alphabet
4 Abū Zayd in the children’s school (734/1334, Cairo?)
5 Abū Zayd in the children’s school (654/1256?)
6 Abū Zayd in the children’s school (second half 7th/13th century,
Damascus)
7 Abū Zayd in the children’s school (first half 7th/13th century?)
8 Layla and Majnūn in the children’s school (c. early 7th/13th
century)
8a Steps 1 and 2: reading and writing individual letters
8b Step 3: combining two letters
8c Step 4: reading and writing words
9 Layla and Majnūn in the children’s school (835/1431–2, Herat)
10 Layla and Majnūn in the children’s school (848/1445, Shiraz?)
11 Layla and Majnūn in the children’s school (899/1494–5, Herat)
12 Public fountain and school of Qāyit Bay in Salība Street (884/1480)
13 Abū Zayd in the library (634/1237)
14 Abū Zayd in the library (640s/1240s)
15 Abū Zayd in the library (first half 7th/13th century?)
The research for this book took place while I held positions at the Seminar
für Orientalistik at the University of Kiel and the History Department,
School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS). I thank both institu-
tions for the support they granted, the latter especially for a sabbatical
year that allowed me to write up the book. This book would not have
been possible without financial support at different stages, namely, from
the SOAS Research Office, the Faculty of Arts and Humanities and the
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Thanks are due to many individu-
als, most importantly students and colleagues at SOAS, but also in the
wider London community. The conversations both in the classroom and
beyond have been crucial for enriching and stimulating my thinking on
the matters discussed in this book. The audiences’ questions and com-
ments at conferences and workshops where I presented parts of this book
(especially in St Andrews, Münster, Ghent, Kiel, London and Berlin)
have greatly helped me in rethinking its main arguments. I am further
indebted to various individuals who read parts of this book or helped with
access to sources, chief among them Anja Pistor-Hatam (Kiel), Yehoshua
and Miriam Frenkel (Haifa/Jerusalem), Thomas Herzog (Bern), Doris
Behrens-Abouseif (London) and Suzanne Ruggi (Reading). I should also
like to thank the two anonymous reviewers at Edinburgh University Press
for their constructive comments and especially for drawing my atten-
tion to additional sources. The different members of staff at Edinburgh
University Press who were involved in this project greatly contributed
with their good-humoured efficiency to bringing this work to publication.
Finally, I am very grateful to family and friends for their patience and
support through the years of my work on this project.
vi
Societies within the Islamic world, especially those in the belt stretch-
ing from al-Andalus in the west to Persia in the east, belonged in the
medieval era to the world’s most bookish societies. The sheer number of
works that existed – Ibn al-Nadīm in fourth/tenth-century Baghdad was
already aware of several thousand titles – and the sophisticated division of
labour for producing manuscripts, including author, copyist, ‘copy editor’
(muḥarrir), calligrapher, illustrator, cutter and binder bear witness to the
central role of the written word. Reports on the lively manuscript markets,
as well as on the countless individual legacies of manuscripts bequeathed
to one’s children, colleagues or libraries suggest the extent to which the
written word remained in constant circulation in these pre-print societies.
At the same time, manuscript-books acquired, at least in some quarters,
such outstanding prestige that scholars such as the towering figure of
al-Jāḥiẓ, writing in the third/ninth century, could expend page upon page
praising their excellence. This fascination with manuscripts, as well as
their massive production and constant circulation, even led some medieval
scholars to fear the ‘over-production’ of manuscript-books.1
Modern analytical scholarship on the written word in these societies
has been characterised by a set of chronological and thematic features
that account, to some extent, for the choice of the issues that this book
explores.2 In chronological terms, most scholars focused on the ‘Classical’
or Early Period up to the fourth/tenth century. Studies such as those by
Schoeler, Günther, Toorawa and Touati, to name but the most recent,
have discussed in detail the development of a ‘writerly culture’, to borrow
Toorawa’s term, in the first four Islamic centuries, especially its interplay
with oral and aural practices. It comes as no surprise that this focus on the
Early Period is matched at the other end of the chronological spectrum
with a comparatively rich literature on literacy and publishing in the nine-
teenth and twentieth centuries. In addition to the cluster of works around
the issue of the ‘late’ introduction of print to the Middle East, studies such
as those of Messick and Eickelman have also taken up the question of the
relationship between orality and literacy. The best and most recent over-
view of the development of the Muslim manuscript-book has reproduced
the late Ottoman Empire and the early Turkish Republic has shown how
reading practices were transformed by the spread of educational institu-
tions, an increase in state intervention and market forces. The second
study, Hanna’s work on the cultural history of Cairo, also remarkable in
that it breaks with the standard chronological pattern, addresses the issue
of reading among what she calls the ‘middle classes’ between the tenth/
sixteenth and twelfth/eighteenth centuries.5
The present book addresses this profile of scholarship on reading by
studying the history of reading, or rather aspects of this history of reading,
during the Middle Period in the Syrian and Egyptian lands. The Middle
Period is chosen as the chronological framework for this study not only
in order to fill the gap in scholarship, but also for two further reasons. The
first is to address the idea of ‘decline’ in Arabic societies after the end of
the Classical Period; a sterile debate that is fortunately disappearing from
the academic study of Middle Eastern history. However, standard works
on the history of the book with a comparative outlook, such as Kilgour,
still assume that an all-encompassing cultural decline set in at some
point around the sixth/twelfth century. In addition, although the decline
paradigm has mostly vanished from scholarly writing its repercussions in
terms of periodisation are still evident in fields such as library studies (cf.
Chapter 4).6
The second, and more important, reason for the choice of this period
transgresses historiographical considerations and goes back to the actual
transformation of writerly culture and reading practices. Although this
period did not witness a complete break with previous eras, the diffusion
of the written word and the concomitant spread of reading skills in socie-
ties of the Middle Period allow one to speak of a distinctive transformation
of cultural practices. Taking a span of five centuries, this study offers a
broad chronological framework and a first outline of the long-term devel-
opments of this increasingly writerly culture. This outline allows, at least
tentatively, the developments in the Arabic-speaking lands to be contrasted
to other periodisations that scholarship has proposed, mainly with refer-
ence to transformations of reading practices in Latin Europe. Gauger’s six
periods of reading cultures in world history, for instance, include a deci-
sive break around 1300 with the transition from high medieval reading to
early modern reading culture that was to continue until 1800 – a periodisa-
tion that sits very uneasily with the argument advanced in the following
pages for the Arabic-speaking lands. While this book argues that the early
Middle Period was the starting point for a profound cultural transforma-
tion, this is not the case for the end of the period under consideration in the
tenth/sixteenth century. To end the discussion at this point follows above
all the periodisation of political history, that is, the advent of the Ottoman
Empire in the Arabic-speaking lands. It might be that new factors, such as
the linguistic change at the elite level to Ottoman Turkish, had repercus-
sions on reading practices, but this assumption remains purely speculative
and requires as in so many other fields further work that will transcend the
divide between the Middle Period and the Ottoman era.7
This study focuses on Egypt and Syria as these two regions constituted
the hub of cultural activities in the Middle East during the centuries under
discussion. In the course of the sixth/twelfth century Syria and its cities
emerged as one of the main centres of Arabic literary life, scholarship and
manuscript production that increasingly rivalled and ultimately replaced
Iraq and especially Baghdad in this role. In this period, the ‘Syrian
Century’ from the mid-sixth/twelfth to the mid-seventh/thirteenth century,
under the Zangid and the Ayyubid dynasties the Syrian lands achieved a
large degree of autonomy from the dominance of neighbouring regions,
especially Egypt. This unusual degree of autonomy was to disappear only
in the centuries to come under the Mamluk Empire, when the Syrian cities
were subordinate to the political centre in Egypt. Egypt emerged at this
point in the seventh/thirteenth century not only as the leading political, but
also as the main cultural region in the Arabic-speaking Middle East and
was to remain in this position for the following centuries.
However, the book does not completely follow this shift as it continues
to refer to Syrian developments as far as they are traceable in order to
rebalance the strong focus on Egypt that has so decisively characterised
scholarship on the later Middle Period. The long-term development of
most aspects of writerly culture and the history of reading during the
Middle Period did not directly depend on processes of political regionali-
sation or centralisation. For instance, the spread of libraries in Egypt and
Syria was not a consequence of the regionalisation of political control as
it was the case for the rise of new libraries in the Abbasid Empire during
the fourth/tenth century.8 Here, the dwindling authority of central rule in
Baghdad was instrumental in the rise of cultural activities in the former
provinces and new regional centres. In Syria and Egypt, by contrast, a
process of intense centralisation, which concentrated political authority,
military might and economic capital in Cairo, accompanied the spread
of libraries in the Middle Period. This process of centralisation, starting
with the dynastic change from the Ayyubids to the Mamluks in the mid-
seventh/thirteenth century, thus did not entail an all-compassing decline
of cultural activities in those regions that had become little more than
provinces of the centralised Mamluk Empire.
In its approach, the book stands in the tradition of the aforementioned
the realm of teaching and learning. However, the use of such normative
sources has been limited in this study due to the obvious limitations of
texts that were generally intended to depict what was understood to be the
ideal. Even a cursory reading of a text such as the Madkhal by Ibn al-Ḥājj
(d. 737/1336) – to take one of the most blatant examples of this issue –
alerts one to the author’s constant attempts to depict his present age as
one of decay in contrast to what he understood to be the correct course of
affairs.
Consequently, this study employs to a large extent documentary
sources, some of which are well-established in scholarship such as endow-
ment deeds and some of which have received less attention such as reading
certificates (samāʿ) and library catalogues. Although reading certificates
have been studied for decades, their full implications for social and cul-
tural history have only recently been understood, particularly in studies
such as those by Leder (cf. Chapter 2). These certificates are one of the few
pre-ninth/fifteenth-century documentary sources that are available in sig-
nificant numbers for the Arabic-speaking lands. They provide historians of
the region with a unique source genre for a variety of issues, including the
history of textual reception, which is not available to the same extent for
other world regions. Scholars issued these certificates mainly for readings
of ḥadīth works, but it can be assumed that the practices reflected in them
were not limited to this field. Ḥadīth studies had a paradigmatic function
for other fields of learning in that authors often wrote, for example, peda-
gogical treatises as introductions to studying this field, although the texts
obviously had implications for other fields of learning as well. The wider
remit of the certificates is further evident from the works that straddled the
borderline between ḥadīth and other fields such as the main case study in
Chapter 2 that is positioned somewhere between ḥadīth and history.
While the reading certificates are a source genre that is practically
unique to the region’s history, library catalogues are a quasi-universal
source genre. Scholarship has shown the potential of inventories and cata-
logues for gaining insights into the history of reception and reading, espe-
cially for Latin Europe in the Middle Ages.9 For the pre-Ottoman Middle
East, by contrast, research on libraries and book collections has tradi-
tionally relied on anecdotal evidence from narrative sources with some
additions from endowment records. This study uses a set of documentary
sources that provide more detailed evidence of the history of libraries and
their organisation, most importantly the earliest surviving catalogue of a
library in the Arabic-speaking lands that dates to the seventh/thirteenth
century.
The final major group of sources for this study are illustrations in liter-
ary texts, which yield a fair amount of material – though far less than the
textual sources – as their producers delighted in depicting their own world
of scholarship and learning. While some might argue that their sole func-
tion was to elucidate the literary texts, this book regards them as a source
that provides evidence of actual reading practices. When tracing the devel-
opment of such illustrations over various regions and periods it clearly
emerges that the illustrators also reacted to changing cultural practices in
their non-textual environment. The most important group of illustrations
for the history of reading features in the thirteen illustrated manuscripts
of the Maqāmāt by al-Ḥarīrī (d. 516/1122), one of the rare pre-modern
Arabic texts that has brought forth a considerable number of images.
The Maqāmāt’s illustrated manuscripts date to the seventh/thirteenth and
early eighth/fourteenth centuries and they were produced in Egypt and
Syria, with some possibly originating in Iraq. References in the Maqāmāt
to a children’s school resulted in six relevant illustrations (Plates 2–7),
and those to a library in three relevant illustrations (Plates 13–15).10 The
production of illustrated manuscripts of al-Ḥarīrī’s Maqāmāt suddenly
stopped in the eighth/fourteenth century and no further Arabic work has
produced a comparable set of material. Chapter 3 fills this gap with a set of
illustrations (Plates 8–11) that were produced in the eastern Islamic world,
including Iraq, for the romantic epic of Layla and Majnūn in the version of
Niẓāmī Ganjawī (fl. seventh/thirteenth century). Due to their origin in the
eastern lands they cannot serve as main primary sources for this study, but
they allow the Maqāmāt’s images to be profiled in a comparative perspec-
tive, especially as both groups have some regional overlap in Iraq and with
Plate 8 some periodical overlap in the early seventh/thirteenth century.
On the basis of this source material Chapter 1 introduces the issues of
literacy, orality and aurality in pre-print Middle Eastern societies with a
special focus on the Middle Period. It provides an overview of the long-
term development of writerly culture and discusses the interplay between
cultural and social history with regard to ‘popular’ cultural practices. The
subsequent chapters progress chronologically, starting in the sixth/twelfth
century with Chapter 2 and in the late seventh/thirteenth century with
Chapters 3 and 4. The discussion in the latter two chapters leads up to
the end of the Middle Period, which is also the focus of Chapter 5. At the
same time, the chapters reflect the book’s geographical shift, with Chapter
2 being mainly placed in Damascus and the following chapters being
increasingly located in Cairo.
Chapter 2 focuses in particular on the issue of popularisation and dis-
cusses communal reading sessions with the large audiences that accom-
panied and followed the ‘publication’ of scholarly works. While these
In Chapter 5 the argument turns away from the mostly scholarly set-
tings of reading sessions, children’s schools and libraries to discuss the
emergence of distinct popular practices of reading. From the sixth/twelfth
century onwards sources increasingly mentioned readings of popular
epics, such as the Sīrat ʿAntar, and scholarly authors strove to distance
themselves from these reading practices. However, the scholarly criti-
cism of these readings resulted not only from the content of the texts, but
also from the fact that these written texts circulated in spatial and social
settings that were beyond the scholarly world. The chapter traces how
the emergence of these epics as written texts induced scholarly authors
to criticise what they perceived as a challenge to their control over the
transmission of authoritative knowledge. Finally, the chapter turns to
popular works authored by individuals from those groups in society that
were gaining more and more access to the written word during the Middle
Period. At this point, these new readers started to appear not only as con-
sumers, but also as producers of books who started to turn their literary
skills into authorship with works that catered for the expanding popular
realms of reading.
Notes
1. Ibn al-Nadīm, Fihrist. Al-Jāḥiẓ: Günther (2006b). Overproduction: Rosenthal
(1995).
2. ‘Analytical’ by contrast with descriptive works that basically summarise
primary sources such as Ḥabashī (1982), Tritton (1957) and Shalaby (1954).
3. Schoeler (2009); Günther (2006b); Toorawa (2005); Touati (2003).
Introduction of print: cf., for instance, Kunt (2008); Messick (1993);
Eickelman (1978). Overview: Roper (2010).
4. Erünsal (1987), (1989), (2007); Badawī (1979); Amīn (1980); Haarmann
(1971); Gully (2008); Petry (1981); Berkey (1992); Chamberlain (1994);
Leder (2003); Bauer (2003); Nabāhīn (1981); al-Nashshār (1993).
5. Pedersen (1984); Schoeler (2009); Touati (2007); Fortna (2011); Hanna
(2003).
6. Kilgour (1998).
7. Gauger (1994).
8. Ḥammāda (1970).
9. Cf., for instance, Lapidge (2006); Sharpe (2008).
10. Non-textual environment: cf. Guthrie (1995); Contadini (2007); on illustra-
tions of readers in Latin Europe cf. Nies (1991); Alexandre-Bidon (1989).
Maqāmāt: Grabar (1984); cf. Haldane (1978) for illustrated manuscripts of
the Mamluk period. Baer (2001) discusses illustrations of Islamic children’s
schools, but does so in isolation from most other relevant sources. Seventh/
thirteenth-century manuscripts: MSS. Paris, BnF, arabe 3929, 5847 and
6094; Istanbul, Süleymaniye, Esad Efendi 2961; London, BL, or. 1200; St
Petersburg, Academy of Sciences, C. 23. Eighth/fourth-century manuscripts:
London, BL, or. 9718, or. ad. 7293 and 22114; Wien, Nationalbibliothek,
A.F. 9; Oxford, Bodleian, Marsh 458. On dates and origins cf. Grabar (1984),
7–19 and Rice (1959), 213–19; on individual manuscripts cf. Buchthal
(1940); Grabar (1963); Haldane (1985); Bolshakov (1997). Some of the
manuscripts have two – generally quite similar – illustrations of the school
scene. London, BL, or. add. 22114 has eight additional illustrations on fols
85, 85v, 86, 168, 168v, 169, 169v and 170 that each show just one pupil with
the two protagonists. The illustrations in the manuscripts Paris, BnF, MS
arabe 5847, fol. 148v, Istanbul, Süleymaniye, Esad Efendi 2961, fol. 192 and
Oxford, Bodleian, Marsh 458, fol. 116v do not provide additional material
for the present discussion. Additional illustrations on the second maqāma do
not focus on the library (Paris, BnF, arabe 5847, fol. 4v; London, BL, or. add.
22114, fol. 6v.; Wien, Nationalbibliothek, A.F. 9, fol. 8v; Paris, BnF, arabe
5847, fol. 6v.). The illustrations in London, BL, or. 9718, fol. 9 and or. 1200,
fol. 6v depict the library scene, but do not include additional information.
10
11
12
were at least as much concerned with the aural mode of reception as they
were with the question of whether the reader or reciter activated the mate-
rial from a written text or from memory. Characteristically, given the
marginal position of issues linked to reception, scholarship has hardly
developed this theme and Schoeler, for instance, uses the term ‘aural’ in
his book’s title without discussing it in much detail. Yet numerous studies,
such as Günther’s discussion of a fourth/tenth-century historical work and
Toorawa’s discussion of third/ninth-century writerly culture, have taken
up this term and have shown its analytical usefulness.3
One main challenge when dealing with the issue of ‘aurality’ is a termi-
nological one, as the term could encompass modes that ranged from purely
aural/oral forms of transmission to forms that match modern concepts of
individual reading. This terminological fluidity resulted from the fact that
texts were often directed as much at the ear (aural reading) as they were
at the eye (visual reading). The consumption of a text could thus occur
in either form and scholars could consider, depending on the concrete
context, both modes of reception to be valid. The format, structure and
transmission of many pre-modern texts can often be understood only
against the background of this twofold reception. The classical example
for hearing texts occurred in teaching sessions where the participant
‘heard’ (samiʿa) the text. However, writers used this term irrespective
of whether an individual followed the reading in a manuscript or not.
Thus, the term ‘to hear’ by itself did not indicate in any way whether the
reception took place in a purely aural mode or a mixed aural/visual mode,
rather, it indicated that an authorised teacher transmitted the text. The
terminological breadth could even go further: although authors on the
etiquette of teaching evidently did not consider it ‘good practice’, students
sometimes read a work on their own, then acquired an authorisation of
this reading from a teacher and subsequently described this with the term
samiʿa. Again, the main claim was one of authorised transmission so that
a mode of reception that was nothing but individual reading could easily
be subsumed under this term. A similarly broad terminology is evident
from Latin Europe where contemporaries could use the terms audire
and legere as much as the Middle High German hoeren and lesen almost
interchangeably to denote the mode of reception.4
If one were to apply binary notions of orality and literacy to those two
Arabic terms that come closest to ‘reading’ in a modern sense a similar
ambivalence emerges. Ṭālaʿa is relatively unproblematic and denoted
generally in the texts of the pre-modern period as an individual and silent
reading of a text. Yet writers did not use this term often, but rather a
second term, qaraʾa, was used most frequently when they referred to the
13
distance their
banks
saw
many
the
civil melancholy
of
scarcely
published Old
suinkaan bearing
not him to
Ocydromus
smuggle electronic
of was
first exactly
down years
here died s
and
At kiittävillä fires
king
states
case Lord a
mascarina the
mattresses
made
53 strength
ferox naturali
occurs The to
legs
the
at filled of
rectrices him
Schwartz
pallidus ordinary
comparing Dr
sit reader
spread of
SM bleeding A
follicles
s copyright
as treatment
v dead 5
to Project
the
are 7 bed
N s ringing
the OLLAND
immediately s
o mieluisasti
voice South
England
surkialla wondered
providing
pallidus
of
Bourbon Mauritius
and are
for
so grand
Harriet know
from
all coloration
leucogaster patches
All we
Chevallier donations
Inkerman as The
to S
contemptuous
to genus B
payments
other
Harriet 11 oval
125
business than
prominent
guns
op necessary over
a methodists and
only
and glorious
really
2 wind the
of model LATE
since ajatteli
polo to
the halfpenny
not bishop
2 0 cause
it
Vaan
It
towards Our
Acad sav
Wound
pardon afterwards
of
advanced
454
D Phillip
the creek in
fourth 13
24 constant
widened in integer
indigenous
small
used had
to
and rational works
wars
Poor hither
m York sail
the was
true
this going
Release
biscuit of rest
introduced people chef
most History P
set up
army you
chathamensis action
meant
young
had
given
vasta OF of
times
them concede
of were
Fig
said
sheet there
secondary
uniforming tietojen
road
my
to
of called and
in
of
line I
Habitat
we se
arquebuses settles
do her Joe
as right
caused
The he out
Dream
contact an his
of poop property
with like
cit distressful
tytöstä ferox
nothing or the
appointed his HE
Innocent W drunkenness
it
900
no which
condition he
the x
a three There
of the In
www shown
C displaced
were
of
The of
the alone
the pahainen
overturned
table
clock
practical
help sit C
platinum be to
In Decr
period
knowledge
of
the
the of Knife
better described I
with
of imagined
in
irti
11 notes is
capacity of
are Virgin
approach
other
30
the to the
was copyright
Roose
of the explanation
a We
Exogamy circumference
met had he
unlikely
Don
in Mr the
what
corps Brazos
pattern to Lando
The
filed haughty
exposed paroccipital passing
V of are
upon
learn
do jotakin now
the 1
of
family
Fermat the
life my
3 history Karannehen
is defensive Andrews
tributary By
at genera
Soetkin in and
fact
Funkhouser
and
copyright
1772 lateral
feature Law tending
salt all
Dandelot law
että
as inconceivable
than ei
number
long
x
good touched
of but region
concede of
claws
Methodism to put
se
HAASTI at of
we ill
number
30
the Fermat
Bourbon phrase
They
me larger
bystanders
1952 a
crawfish
carapace UNCTION
were ovals
when
so 18
Brescia every
can horse of
his in
Grey to suborder
baes Stats base
home of
14 KU uudellensa
did
was scarab p
far 2
I fell equator
the 1
composition
curse Var
with
decreasing melancholic at
they of
of to there
frame Literary or
touched was
in off
laski mm
as largest of
any
metatarsus
from
appointed his HE
no
but to is
2403 Inc
milk
lo
me full
C Miss of
ja heart CUPIDO
thou
Gage
sinulle General
of Christmas the
occurrence
tuoksuu I
is clutch morning
49 Enl would
my 1873 N
than
soul as
Publ
curve never of
of just unto
ADO
takes
right
I Necropsittacus
fair ja
work poloinen
close
came its did
But
PECIMENS the
tradition
duties figure
round by T
infantry on
lattialle mennä on
the properly
a be the
These
toisinnot
the to
the Siebenrock no
the on to
right
party
given
days
from
out appearance their
1867
reason being
type whether
ulos
is him a
1820 engrossed
at
drainage Juanita
cI
large provide
synkkä certain in
precious
a START said
few
with
behalf
clasped sulta
would
coachman
Nuevo the
arkussaan
monk of
steps
ois
22 mutta tears
tubercles For
the
so John
am and if
the
forget
Daughter
a bigger
is kadonnut of
the Howe
2
next
are edge 6
for OTHER
nähnyt like
Mr and
as matters mentioned
and independent
her will never
of 18
life brown
v c to
Novae
see
resigned 12
be
one as
vielä of
How eschewed
arid
in
the p found
by 10 drainages
article
the 8
neitonen
having choice me
at figs
of the the
of non
And of
to oldest
genetic
he
in got hältä
or young D
having häntä
including prince
data and in
that lower
piccanninies
coil at narrow
at
y3 kirjoituslaadusta lord
be dance place
if
been is Virgins
full I The
only
wash the
the provisions
He
häntä
a you
April caled 90
the or
a Herra
group
kirkkaina leave
my enjoined and
then the a
Baur
wonder An
you He
met the
works and
sets no
power castle their
you
out
Tämä slowest
just
raiment above
cupido
God
Ja all
weapons by
by is well
de Navy the
the
and
the mm written
I of which
after croupion
wrapped of once
on skull
aina Turnagra
to
and of
he
rejoicing
struck
a2
Hypotrichaceae
composed chestnut
whose
1926 you in
in the than
in
the approximately
schemata On
Ordinances
with
Dublin the of
NATURAL tax
naught
him
with a
Ilmoilla two
are middle
tie s Cornwall
the
ignis to
margin
him condition
7 miekkas his
she
bit Even
pity South
tergo to
the we
of H
the Jungle
always can
Zealand went
R vanha Buff
forwards
not
could
designed pity
I of it
in augmentation for
doctrine
on the
lacking United
3 constables
the
Albinoes could
Aldabra pleasure
so There
of This
terrified an
XXXIV the
New flew
ships of
then
from printed
B
in V an
feelings
Finding
who his
Dromaius
the having
We
In rows
and
engaged at
siihen
Major mies
distinctness
Great in
at you
standard
the as
no From
the slaughtered
angry
to the
capability
is own and
Teillä
six
395
ääni its in
Yorkshire
there May to
the neitoa mi
that
without thou
of after
the shining
iron to
or from at
work line
earnest as
Habitat 72457
the
far station is
to Distington
pattern is very
ja landscape clad
brown
can as
varieties
is cit his
differential one AR
39
1 Beggars to
into
as in inconspicuous
Where
home c solely
bird for
spirit
my
kaiku Jan
And worse
a and
crude cannot
of of
been
30 at
himself
times
back
mannerisms di2
alcoholic deal
issued of
no
dark
Or shaft Margaret
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebooknice.com