21 Ch.17 Circular Economy
21 Ch.17 Circular Economy
Manh L.V. and A.H. Pham (2023), 'The Circular Economy in Viet Nam', in Kimura, F. et
al (eds.), Viet Nam 2045: Development Issues and Challenges, Jakarta: ERIA, pp.
499-552.
1. Introduction
The circular economy is becoming an inevitable global trend, meeting the requirements
of sustainable development in the context of increasingly degraded natural resources,
a polluted environment, and biodiversity loss due to climate change. Viet Nam has
the potential to become a leader in terms of a circular economy in the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
Prior to 2020, the principle of a circular economy was integrated into some of Viet
Nam’s economic models, typically those in the agricultural sector, ecological economic
models, and waste-recycling craft villages. 1 After 2020, the concept was considered
a key orientation for national socio-economic development. Indeed, in the National
Socio-Economic Development Strategy, 2021–2030, with a Vision to 2045, the circular
economy is emphasised as a solution for reconciling the relationship between economic
development and natural resources consumption. Provisions for a circular economy
were thus promulgated in the Law on Environmental Protection 2020.
This chapter evaluates policy tools that have an important role to play in promoting
circular economy adoption in Viet Nam, such as environmental protection taxes and
charges, green public procurement, expansion of manufacturer responsibility, and
recycling markets. A SWOT analysis looks at current conditions under which a transition
to a circular economy can occur, considering three national strategic breakthroughs
related to institutions, technology, and infrastructure. These results help assess the
success of circular economy models into priority sectors. Furthermore, a national road
map for priority sectors, fields, and areas regarding a circular economy is detailed.
1
According to Government Decree No. 52/2018/ND-CP dated 12 April 2018 on the development of rural crafts, a ’craft village’
refers to one or many residential areas in hamlets, wards, or the equivalent that practices rural craft(s) activities as follows:
(i) agro–forestry–fishery product processing and preservation; (ii) production of handicraft products; (iii) processing and
preparation of ingredients and materials serving rural crafts; (iv) production of woodwork, straw, ceramic, glass, textile,
embroidery, or minor mechanical engineering; (v) production and sale of ornamental animals; (vi) salt production; and (vii)
other services serving production and livelihood of rural inhabitants. Moreover, Article 56 of the Law on Environmental
Protection 2020 stipulates the requirements for environmental protection in these craft villages. Every craft village must
have an environmental protection plan, an autonomous environmental protection organisation, and environmental protection
infrastructure. Manufacturing establishments and households in a craft village must seek and implement environmental
protection measures as prescribed by law; implement measures for noise, vibration, light, dust, heat radiation, emissions,
and wastewater reduction, and in situ pollution remediation; and collect, classify, store, and treat solid waste as prescribed
by law.
500
often leading to the creation of large amounts of waste. In contrast, the circular economy model
focusses on resource management and recycling in a closed loop to avoid generating waste. The
Law on Environmental Protection 2020 defines a circular economy as an economic model that
encompasses the design, production, consumption, and services activities aimed at reducing raw
materials, extending product life, reducing waste generation, and minimising adverse impacts on
the environment.
Conversion from a linear economic model to a circular economy is a practical approach to solving
the fraught relationship between the economy and environment, creating long-term resilience and
economic opportunities as well as providing environmental and social benefits.
A circular economy has five components: (i) a design to create green products and to increase
repairability, recovery, recycling, and reuse of products and components; (ii) application of cleaner
production measures, emission reduction, and the circularisation of materials in the production
stage; (iii) more thoughtful consumption through the provision of better services, increasing the
responsibility of consumers towards the ecological environment; (iv) better waste management
by segregation, end-of-life collection, and waste recycling; and (v) from waste back to resources,
including waste recycling and resource reuse (Morl, 2015).
In a circular economy, the value of products, materials, and natural resources are maintained in the
economy for longer periods of time, minimising waste generation. Measures to implement a circular
economy are diverse, such as refusing to use products harmful to the environment or applying
various measures to repair, reuse, remanufacture, and recycle to achieve the goal of reducing the
consumption of raw materials and fuel. Enterprises adopt strategies such as (i) closing the loop
through design to eliminate waste, pollution, and extraction of materials; (ii) slowing the loop to
keep materials in use for longer periods of time; and (iii) narrowing the loop, by using fewer raw
materials and for more purposes (Bocken, Miller, Evans, 2016). Based on solutions and strategies
for the circular economy, the potential for new business models – such as a circular supply model,
recovery model, long-life extension model, and sharing model – will appear (Table 17.1).2
2
Waste Reduction Week in Canada, Five Business Models of Circularity, https://wrwcanada.com/en/get-involved/resources/
circular-economy-themed-resources/five-business-models-circularity
501
Table 17.1. Value Motivations of a Circular Economy and
Benefits for Consumers
Extending the length of an asset’s use cycle Designed to last a long time
additional use cycles Recycles used material for use as raw material
A circular economy also helps address co-benefits related to social inequality and ecological crises.
With social equity in mind, a circular economy helps reduce social inequality and works towards
inclusive management to achieve decoupling between gross domestic product (GDP) growth and
the level of resource use and waste generation into the environment. It requires the participation
of all stakeholders from the public sector, mining and raw material enterprises, processors,
manufacturers, distributors, retailers, consumers, and garbage collectors. In particular, the public
sector plays an important role in creating and promoting a circular ecosystem.
Today, digital technological developments are occurring rapidly, such as those related to cyber-
physical systems, internet of things (IoT), simulation, advanced data analytics, robots, augmented
reality, and intelligent tools for the support of human resources. New digital technologies can
502
promote the implementation of a circular economy, including mobile technology, machine-to-
machine communication, cloud computing, social media for business, big data analytics, modular
designing technology, advanced recycling technology, life and material science technology, trace
and return systems, and 3D printing (Anbumozhi, 2022).
Indeed, IoT and the circular economy should be considered as two closely linked components, as
IoT helps form and operate digital technology, creating a driving force to promote the application
of a circular economy. The parallel development of these two components will create synergies to
achieve ambitious economic growth goals while effectively using natural resources and reducing
waste generation and adverse environmental impacts. Each level of the circular economy model can
apply digital technology (Table 17.2).
park
hand goods
503
There are several potential evolving goods and services that support a transition to a circular
economy, such as eco-design services, design for recycling and reuse, refurbishment and repair
services, markets for raw and secondary materials, and technologies and products supporting
the application of a circular economy. Standards and technical regulations should be set up for
these potential goods and services; ensuring appropriate market openness and trade facilitation in
circular goods and services is also crucial.
In addition, legislation needs to consider factors that play a role in promoting this transition on a
national scale. A circular economy platform must be developed by governments synchronously with
enough resources to support change. Development strategies and plans play a fundamental role,
contributing to stimulating the circular economy process at various scales through a systematic
approach similar to the ecological industry approach (i.e. analysis of the flow and possible
coordination from near space). To do this, governments must first focus on institutions, because
institutions are both barriers to and promoters of the compliance economy. Good governance is also
key and can be promoted through equality, participation, consensus, transparency, accountability,
and the rule of law in an effective, efficient, and lasting manner.
Lastly, culture is often a major barrier to the launch of a circular economy platform. Culture governs
the behaviour of businesses and consumers in dealing with nature; in the economic and efficient
use of natural resources; and in waste classification, recycling, and reuse. Economic, social, and
environmental benefits should be made clear as well as the desire to improve the quality of life.
A circular economy focusses on materials and energy flows to prolong the use of resources and
waste management. It helps infrastructure be designed and built in modular and flexible ways and
energy systems become resilient and renewable, reducing costs and creating positive impacts on
the environment.
504
4. Policy and Legal Framework Related to the
Circular Economy in Viet Nam
As shown in Figure 17.1, Viet Nam’s policy and legal framework to develop a circular economy
consist of two main groups:
i. policies of the Communist Party and government, reflecting national orientations of the circular
economy (e.g. resolutions of the Central Committee, Committee Secretary, National Assembly,
and government; socio-economic development strategies and development strategies of various
sectors; and national schemes promulgated by the Prime Minister); and
ii. legal provisions prescribed in existing laws and bylaws (e.g. environmental protection and
investment laws and regulations on taxes and incentives).
CE = circular economy.
Source: Authors.
505
4.1. Policies of Communist Party and Government
Regarding the circular economy, the perspectives of the Communist Party and government can be
divided as follows:
i. Before the 12th National Congress. Before 2016, the term ‘circular economy’ had not yet been
mentioned in any policy, but there was some movement towards implementing a circular
economy.
ii. During the 12th National Congress. From 2016 to 2020, the term ‘circular economy’ was
indicated in several national plans, such as that for the energy sector and the National Action
Plan on Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021–2030.
iii. During the 13th National Congress. Since 2021, the concept of a circular economy has been
integrated into the Socio-Economic Development Strategy, 2021–2030, with a Vision to 2045
and Socio-Economic Development Plan, 2021–2025. It also has been mentioned in resolutions
on agriculture, farmer and rural issues, and the collective economy. Other resolutions and
strategies on economic restructuring and the development of industries feature mention of a
circular economy. In June 2022, the Prime Minister issued Decision No. 687/QD-TTg, approving
the scheme for circular economy development in Viet Nam. It aims to decrease greenhouse gas
emissions per GDP by at least 15% compared to 2014; to reuse, recycle, and treat 85% of plastic
waste; and to reduce 50% of plastic waste in the ocean by 2030 (Table 17.3).3
3
Viet Nam Circular Economy, Decision No. 687/QD-TTg dated 7 June 2022 on Approving the Scheme for Circular Economy
Development in Vietnam, https://vietnamcirculareconomy.vn/en/policy-library/decision-no-687-qd-ttg-dated-june-07-
2022-on-approving-the-scheme-for-circular-economy-development-in-vietnam/#:~:text=Decision%20No.-,687%2FQD%2-
DTTg%20dated%20June%2007%2C%202022%20on%20approving,circular%20economy%20development%20in%20
Vietnam&text=On%20June%207%2C%202022%2C%20the,circular%20economy%20in%20Viet%20Nam.
506
Table 17.3. Orientations and Policies on the Circular
Economy in Viet Nam
507
STT Policy Contents Related to the
Circular Economy
508
STT Policy Contents Related to the
Circular Economy
2.3 National Action Plan on Sustainable - Promoted the circular economy and
Production and Consumption for sustainable development.
2021–2030 - Supported the development and
application of popularisation and
replication of circular economy
models of resources, fuel, and
materials in production and
consumption activities.
- Promoted the application of
circular economy models in waste
management.
- Promoted the application,
popularisation, and replication of
models of classification, collection,
reuse, and recycling of waste and
scrap; and developed training
documents on circular economy
models for waste management in
agriculture, fisheries, electronics,
chemicals, thermal power, plastic,
paper, construction materials, and
other economic sectors.
- Promoted the supply–demand
connection, developing markets
for environmental products and
technologies, recycling products
and technologies, and low-carbon
technologies.
- Gradually built and applied circular
economic models in the field of
consumption, encouraging the
transition from consumption and
ownership of goods to consumption
and use of services.
509
STT Policy Contents Related to the
Circular Economy
510
STT Policy Contents Related to the
Circular Economy
511
STT Policy Contents Related to the
Circular Economy
512
STT Policy Contents Related to the
Circular Economy
513
STT Policy Contents Related to the
Circular Economy
Note: A VAC system (vuon, ao, chuong) refers to a garden/pond/livestock pen, while a VACR system (vuon, ao, chuong, rung)
denotes a garden/pond/livestock pen/forest.
Source: Authors.
According to the law, a circular economy is officially defined as an economic model that encompasses
design, production, consumption, and services activities aimed at reducing raw materials, extending
product life, reducing waste generation, and minimising adverse impacts on the environment. The
law also assigns responsibilities for a circular economy to relevant government agencies and
stakeholders. Ministries, ministerial agencies, and provincial people’s committees must incorporate
circular economy principles when formulating development strategies; planning a programme
or project; and managing, reusing, and recycling waste. Every business must also establish a
4
The Law on Environmental Protection 2020 replaced the Law on Environmental Protection 2014; it took effect 1 January
2022.
514
management system and take measures to reduce the extraction of natural
resources, reduce waste, and increase waste recycling and reuse from
setting up a project to designing a product or goods for production and
distribution.
Based on the concept outlined under the law, Decree No. 08/2022/ND-CP
dated 10 January 2022 provides more detailed regulations on the criteria,
road maps, and incentive mechanisms for the implementation of a circular
economy in Viet Nam. It identifies three groups of criteria for a circular
economy:
515
clusters should undertake one or more of these measures: (a) design
an optimal master plan that establishes a connection between
investment projects and businesses to improve efficiency in the
use and reduction of the consumption of soil, water, minerals, and
energy; increase the recycling rate; and reduce the total amount of
waste generated; (b) develop and use clean and renewable energy
as prescribed by law; (c) collect and store rainwater for reuse; and
collect, treat, and reuse wastewater; and (d) carry out industrial
symbiosis activities in accordance with the law on the management
of industrial parks and economic zones.
Secondly, the decree stipulates that the Ministry of Natural Resources and
Environment (MNRE) must preside over and cooperate with ministries,
ministerial agencies, and provincial people’s committees in formulating
and submitting to the Prime Minister a national action plan on the circular
economy before 31 December 2023; build and operate a platform for
sharing data on the application of the circular economy model; and
establish and introduce a methodological framework for assessment of
the implementation of the circular economy. Ministries and ministerial
agencies must formulate and approve action plans for implementation
of a circular economy; organise the dissemination of laws and provision
of training on the circular economy; incorporate specific criteria for
implementation of the circular economy in development strategies,
plans, programmes, and projects and in the management, reuse, and
recycling of waste; manage information on the implementation of the
circular economy and integrate it with MNRE’s information system; and
organise pilot applications of the circular economy in the energy, fuel,
and waste industries according to the action plans. Provincial people’s
committees must formulate provincial action plans for implementation in
conformity with the national action plan and organise pilot applications of
the circular economy to the energy, fuel, and waste industries according
to the action plans.
The decree requires three kinds of action plans for the circular economy:
a national action plan; provincial action plans; and action plans for
various industries, fields, and products. Owners of investment projects
and businesses – as well as investors in construction and commercial
operations of infrastructure in dedicated areas for production, business
operations and service provision, and industrial clusters – are encouraged
to apply the circular economy model earlier than the road map specified
in action plans as prescribed.
516
applications, transferring technologies, producing equipment, and training personnel to implement
a circular economy; and providing a platform for connecting information and sharing data on
the circular economy. In addition, the government is encouraging the following activities for the
development of a circular economy:
i. developing technologies and technical solutions, and providing circular economy assessment,
design, and consulting services as prescribed by law;
ii. developing models for connecting and sharing the circular use of products and waste;
establishing cooperative recycling groups, unions and alliances, and models for regional and
rural–urban connections to carry out investment, manufacturing, and business activities,
thereby meeting circular economy criteria;
iii. adopting industrial symbiosis measures in accordance with regulations of law on the
management of industrial parks and economic zones;
iv. developing discarded product reuse and waste-recycling markets;
v. mobilising social resources for the implementation of a circular economy as prescribed by law;
and
vi. developing international cooperation, exchanging experience, knowledge, and technologies in
relation to the circular economy as prescribed by law.
Furthermore, organisations or individuals that carry out activities or have projects applying the
circular economy model are entitled to incentives or assistance in environmental protection.
Incentives and assistance include exemption and reduction of land levies and rents; incentives
from the Viet Nam Environmental Protection Fund, provincial environmental protection funds, and
Vietnam Development Bank; corporate income tax incentives; and subsidies for environmental
protection products and services. Moreover, organisations and individuals implementing circular
economy models are entitled to incentive policies on green credit and green bonds.5
5
Article 154, Article 155, Article 156, and Article 157 of Decree No. 08/2022/ND-CP.
517
Table 17.4. Models Embedding the Principles of the
Circular Economy in Viet Nam
Production
518
Category Circular Economy-Related Principles
Production
Repair and trade of second-hand Repair and refurbishment are quite common in
goods Viet Nam.
Meso Level
Urban areas, residential areas Some pilot activities in residential clusters have
begun, such as wrapping vegetables and fruits
with banana leaves, using glass bottles and
bamboo or paper straws, and using paper cups
instead of plastic cups and cloth bags instead of
plastic bags.
519
Category Circular Economy-Related Principles
Consumption
Intermediate consumption The market for raw materials and fuels for the
recycling and reuse of products has been formed.
Waste Management
520
Category Circular Economy-Related Principles
Waste Management
Note: A VAC system (vuon, ao, chuong) refers to a garden/pond/livestock pen, while a VACR system (vuon, ao, chuong, rung)
denotes a garden/pond/livestock pen/forest.
Source: Authors.
521
Figure 17.2. Framework for a Circular Economy for the
ASEAN Economic Community
522
According to the framework, five strategic priorities are key for the transition to a circular economy:
i. Strategic Priority 1. Harmonise standards, and mutually recognise circular products and
services.
ii. Strategic Priority 2. Encourage trade openness and trade facilitation in circular goods and
services.
iii. Strategic Priority 3. Enhance the role of innovation, digitalisation, and emerging/green
technologies.
iv. Strategic Priority 4. Foster competitive sustainable finance and innovative environmental,
social, and governance (ESG) investments.
v. Strategic Priority 5. Use energy and other resources efficiently.
Despite the many initiatives undertaken, they have been fragmented, with insufficient collective
targets and a lack of a synergetic approach. Indeed, the transition to a circular economy at the
regional level demands cooperation amongst sectoral bodies; collaboration amongst the public
and private sector and communities; as well as preservation of the efforts with commitment. The
process must be built upon emerging best practices at the national level and tips for those AMSs
devising their own road maps to facilitate an ASEAN-wide transition to a circular economy.
At the national level, the implementation of a circular economy is examined by using (i) a resource
productivity indicator that measures material use as a proportion of GDP; (ii) an indicator for the
cyclical use rate of materials in the economy, measured by the material reused as a proportion
of total material used by the economy; and (iii) an output indicator, measuring how much waste is
buried in landfills. These indicators are associated with specific targets.
The legislation and policies on the circular economy in Japan have been collected, examined, and
summarised in Table 17.5.
523
Table 17.5. Overview of Legislation and Policy on the
Circular Economy in Japan
Legislation
524
Name Year Overview
Legislation
525
Name Year Overview
Circular Economy 1999 Consists of four chapters: (i) the way forward
Vision 1999 (developed and to a circular economy, (ii) reconstruction of
published by waste management and recycling measures
METI) towards the establishment of a circular
economy, (iii) future challenges and policy
responses towards the establishment of a
circular economy, and (iv) status and issues
in individual areas. Priority sectors include
containers and packaging, home appliances
and batteries, automobiles and bicycles,
construction material, general industrial
waste, and others (waste oil, gas and oil
equipment, and aerosol cans).
526
Name Year Overview
527
Name Year Overview
528
Name Year Overview
Japan has developed several well-known circular models in urban and rural areas, including eco-
towns and eco-villages. Kawasaki is one eco-town where resources are reused and recycled. During
Japan’s era of high economic growth (i.e. 1950s to 1970s), Kawasaki was a leading industrial city that
suffered from air and water pollution as well as poor waste disposal. The local government joined
with residents to solve this environmental contamination by signing agreements with companies
over air pollution control. Today, Kawasaki is building an economy and society based on circulating
resources, taking advantage of its expertise in promoting environmental industries and recycling.
The Fundamental Strategy of the Kawasaki Sustainable-Energy City Plan was thus developed. It
consists of four pillars:
i. Companies contribute to improving their green credentials through the construction of advanced
recycling facilities and processes of eliminating factory effluent and industrial discharge.
ii. Companies develop sustainable, environmentally friendly districts through research on energy
savings and recycling, management plans, and promotion of research and development of the
industry.
iii. Business alignment encourages the area’s ecology with the construction of the Kawasaki Zero-
Emission Industrial Complex, hybrid cars, and synergic recycling activity in the area.
iv. Companies announce their achievements and convey their ideas to society and developing
countries by constructing an eco-town centre, implementing ecology studies and sharing
information on achievements and ideas. The model also contributes to local employment and
effective land utilisation by attracting businesses to eco-town areas, branding the area and
overall industrial promotion and regional revitalisation (GEC, 2005).
Another related circular model in rural areas is an eco-village (Ogata, 2014). Satoyama – areas
between foothills and arable land – is a production ecosystem featuring secondary forests, farmlands,
irrigation ponds, grasslands, and human settlements. Humans create such areas to produce food
and fuel, conserve land and headwaters, and provide places for leisure. The initiative intends
harmony with nature, comprising human communities where the maintenance and development
of socio-economic activities align with natural processes. The initiative is based on five ecological
529
and socio-economic perspectives: (i) resource use within the carrying capacity and resilience of the
environment; (ii) cyclic use of natural resources; (iii) recognition of the value and importance of local
traditions and cultures; (iv) multi-stakeholder participation and collaboration in sustainable and
multi-functional management of natural resources and ecosystem services; and (v) contributions
to sustainable socio-economies including poverty reduction, food security, sustainable livelihoods,
and local community empowerment (Matsuya, 2013).
To promote a transition to a circular economy, innovation also plays an important role. Japan is a
world leader in eco-innovation, and the environmental market in Japan has been rapidly expanding
since the second half of the 1990s. The Ministry of the Environment; Ministry of Economy, Trade
and Industry; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; and Council for
Science and Technology Policy are major contributors to eco-innovation in Japan. The main policies
include Economic and Fiscal Reform (2007), Economic Growth Initiative (2007), Becoming a Leading
Environmental Nation in the 21st Century: Japan’s Strategy for a Sustainable Society (2007), Keys
to Create Innovation and Promote Eco-Innovation (2007), Cool Earth Innovation Energy Technology
Program (2008), Third Science and Technology Basic Plan (2013), and Intellectual Property Strategic
Program (various years). Many policy instruments, such as mobilisation of financing, have already
been mentioned, including the Industrial Cluster Policy, which illustrates how public support can
be used to access market and private financial resources; eco-town projects, which demonstrate
how central government initiatives can generate local action; market-based instruments that focus
on subsidies and public support schemes for renewables; the Japan Voluntary Emissions Trading
Scheme; green public procurement, which became mandatory in 2001; and awareness raising and
training (Leflaive, 2008).
530
a systemic change – requiring all stakeholders from the public and private sectors, citizens,
knowledge institutions, and non-governmental organisations to play roles. Accordingly, formal
stakeholder engagement mechanisms are essential to inform circular economy policymaking.
For example, forums and websites that are certified by the government should provide
knowledge and services as well as undertake public consultation on circular economy issues.
v. A monitoring framework should be built to show progress towards predefined circular economy
targets. The data collected allow policymakers to monitor progress towards the achievement of
targets to evaluate and to adjust circular economy policies. Furthermore, the framework could
promote transparency by allowing all interested stakeholders to monitor the progress towards
achieving a circular economy.
vi. A national circular economy information system should be established to monitor and to adjust
policy. Collecting and analysing data related to the circular economy inform policymakers,
assessing the effectiveness of circular economy policies and adjusting them when needed.
To enhance policymaking based on robust evidence and data, local governments and relevant
stakeholders should actively harmonise and streamline data collection, ensuring better data
quality and timeliness. This also encourages data sharing from the private sector to enable
comprehensive assessment and projections on waste, resources, and socio-economic and
environmental impacts caused by economic activities.
vii. Japan and Viet Nam should work together to share experiences and best practices in the
adoption and monitoring of circular economy implementation, especially in waste management,
digital technologies, eco-cities and eco-villages, and trade promotion of environmental goods.
531
ii. The rapid development of science and technology, particularly the Fourth Industrial Revolution
and the internet, have contributed to the formation of new solutions and business models that
exploit resources more efficiently.
iii. Greener financial capital continues to grow. Over the last 20 years, green credit and bonds
have become important tools to raise capital for projects that benefit the environment, respond
to climate change, and support sustainable development goals and the Paris Agreement. Viet
Nam’s green capital market has great potential to attract domestic and international investors
in renewable energy, waste management, green agriculture, low-carbon transport, and water
management.6
iv. The awareness and demand of domestic consumers have been a considerable driving force
for innovation in the manufacturing and services sectors. Accordingly, this requires cleaner
production and supply of more environmentally friendly goods and services.
v. The international integration and implementation of trade commitments in new-generation free
trade agreements have created transformational pressures on the manufacturing and business
sectors, since standards and technical regulations on products and goods are associated with
promoting recycling, reuse, and compliance with environmental regulations.
vi. In Viet Nam, many new markets have been formed, such for environmental goods and services,
secondary materials, environmentally friendly products, and green bonds and green credits.
vii. The transition to a circular economy has occurred in many countries, including developed and
developing countries. Lessons from such transitions provide valuable experience for Viet Nam
in formulating and implementing a circular economy model.
i. A systematic approach to governance, as well as in economic activities, has not been recognised.
A holistic approach that cuts across sectoral policies is key to a circular economy. It also requires
shared responsibility across levels of government and stakeholders. Viet Nam shows a lack of
synchronisation in developing and implementing strategies, master plans, and plans. There has
been ineffective coordination amongst all levels and sectors as well as limited cross-sectoral
and inter-regional perspectives in formulating and approving development master plans and
plans.
ii. The effectiveness and enforcement of legal provisions are still limited. Although Viet Nam has
built up a comprehensive system of policy tools to promote the transition to a circular economy,
the implementation of such regulations has been low.
iii. Some sectors still take short-term profit goals without considering long-term and sustainable
benefits from environmental protection and circular production. For example, some enterprises
have violated environmental regulations to reduce their costs for handling pollution. Others
intend to implement a circular economy, but their motivation comes from enjoying the incentives
and support of the government instead of their social responsibility.
6
From 2016 to 2030, Viet Nam could attract about $753 billion of investment in climate, with the majority (about $571 billion)
for transport infrastructure construction. Investment in renewable energy could attract $59 billion, of which more than half
($31 billion) is in solar projects, and $19 billion is in small hydro projects. About $80 billion will be invested in the green
building sector (IFC, 2016).
532
iv. The markets for environmental goods and services, environmentally friendly products, and
recycled products are not a focus and do not operate in line with international markets. One of
the reasons is that there has not been a complete set of standards and technical regulations on
environmentally friendly and recycled products in Viet Nam.
v. The government has not taken a prominent role in supporting the development and regulation
of the markets and the behaviour of actors towards the goal of efficient use of natural
resources and promoting production and consumption of environmental goods and services
and environmentally friendly products.
vi. Some policy tools, such as public investment, consumer rights, the value-added tax, and
environmental protection tax, have not been synchronised to ensure transparency, fairness,
and sustainability in using natural resources. Also, these have not created the financial pressure
and motivation to promote technological innovation, improving the social responsibility of
businesses and consumers to realise circular economy goals.
vii. The apparatus, information and data system, and mechanism for monitoring the implementation
of a circular economy have not yet been formed. At present, many ministries, line ministries,
associations, universities, and research institutes have engaged in the development of a circular
economy in Viet Nam, but there is still a lack of an agency guiding and coordinating the overall
activities related to the circular economy.
viii. The production and consumption of environmentally friendly products and services have not
been popular. Clean production and consumption and sustainable consumption are recognised
as concepts in policy and legal documents rather than widely applied in practice. There has been
low awareness and responsibility for the efficient exploitation, use, and management of natural
resources, as well as the collection, classification, recycling, and reuse of waste in economical
and daily activities.
ix. Financial resources for the implementation of the transition to a circular economy are estimated
to be huge. However, their mobilisation has not been effective. For instance, mechanisms and
policies for investment incentives in solid waste treatment have been institutionalised, but
access to loans has been limited, failing to attract different economic stakeholders.
x. The existing infrastructure has not satisfied the practical requirements for environmental
management. It lacks synchronisation in technologies of waste collection, treatment, recycling,
and reuse. Viet Nam's position in terms of readiness for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
compared to other countries is low. In addition, the small and fragmented scale of production
and business has not been proportionate to the high technology investment. The linkages
between production and business are still weak.
533
Table 17.6. Viet Nam and Other Countries in Promoting
Implementation of a Circular Economy
ASEAN
ASEAN = Association of Southeast Asian Nations, GDP = gross domestic product, Lao PDR = Lao People’s Democratic Republic.
Sources: World Bank, GDP (current US$), https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD (accessed 15 June 2022);
World Bank, Worldwide Governance Indicators, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/worldwide-governance-indicators
(accessed 15 June 2022); WIPO (2022); Wolf et al. (2022).
534
8. Solutions and Road Map for Promoting a
Circular Economy in Viet Nam
Viet Nam is considered a leader in ASEAN that has a strong legal basis for a transition to a circular
economy. Implementing a circular economy requires a road map and development priorities based
on market and social demands. It is essential that specific goals and targets be defined with feasible
actions/measures.
In compliance with the identification of three groups of common criteria in Decree No. 08/2022/
ND-CP guiding the implementation of Law on Environmental Protection 2020, specific indicators are
proposed to measure the progress of the transition to a circular economy at the macro level in Viet
Nam (Table 17.7).
A Reduce the exploitation and use of non-renewable resources and water resources;
increase efficiency in the use of resources, raw materials, and materials; save energy
Reduce the exploitation and use of non-renewable resources and water resources;
A1 increase efficiency in the use of resources, raw materials, and materials
535
Criteria Indicator
A2
A3 Energy savings
536
Criteria Indicator
537
8.2. Specific Solutions for Promoting Implementation
Viet Nam aims to shift from a linear economy towards a circular economy,
targeting sustainable economic development for a more competitive
economy. To realise that goal, a range of solutions are suggested based
on governance, institutions, and infrastructure in Viet Nam.
At the same time, the government may take appropriate steps to enforce
other policies supporting the transition to the circular economy, including
green public procurement, green credit, green bonds, environment
industries, and environmental services. Furthermore, it needs to revise
the current environmental protection tax, value-added tax, consumer
protection, and public investment.
538
Promote material recovery, and minimise non-recyclable waste. In the
circular economy, material recovery is crucial. There are three main ways
to promote material recovery – segregating waste at the source, expanding
producer responsibility, and enhancing the development of new markets
(e.g. recovery and recycling markets of plastic, paper, and metal, and the
market for recycled products). Public procurement has an impact on such
markets since it can direct the production and consumption of recycled
products.
539
MNRE can cooperate with the Ministry of Science and Technology in
developing and providing technical guidance on the application of
the best available techniques. Also, MNRE can review, update, and
supplement the list of best available techniques in a manner that is
relevant to the current situation and level of science and technology
development, providing technical guidance on the application of the best
available techniques for each type of production, business, or service
causing environmental pollution.
540
of labelling in providing information to consumers need to be regulated
so that the products carry a message on their environmental impacts
and how they are dealt with at the end of their lives. At the same time, the
government should continue to consult and to engage with the public,
industries, and other stakeholders when designing new policies and
interventions on the circular economy to ensure their effectiveness.
There are many opportunities for Viet Nam to provide infrastructure that
enhances the transition to a circular economy. For example, conventional
infrastructure can be replaced with green, climate-resilient, and
nature-based solutions. The new infrastructure can be more efficiently
541
designed and planned to reduce the demand for materials and environmental impacts. Regarding
infrastructure for waste management, waste collection and sorting infrastructure needs to be in
place to enable the reuse, repair, refurbishment, and recycling of materials.
Digital infrastructure is an emerging solution to enable connectivity and optimisation of the value
chain in the circular economy. Digital platforms can connect resource suppliers with the demand for
secondary materials. Furthermore, building comprehensive and accessible data systems is key to
informing circular economy policymaking, assessing the effectiveness of circular economy policies,
and adjusting them when needed. In Viet Nam, the General Statistics Office of Viet Nam is assigned
to conduct statistical activities and to provide social and economic information domestically and
internationally. It could coordinate with MNRE to undertake data collection, monitoring, and sharing
on the circular economy. MNRE could provide additional data and analytical insights on national
circular economy indicators.
In the long term, a national circular economy information system should be built to centralise the
data required to assess and to fully inform circular economy policymakers. Data collection is not only
limited to waste-related, environmental, economic, and social data but also covers economic–social
dimensions such as value added and employment. More importantly, monitoring the achievements
of the implementation of a circular economy requires a standardised set of indicators feeding into
the national circular economy information system. This emphasises the necessity of issuance of
national circular economy criteria for Viet Nam.
Financing the transition to a circular economy. The transition to a circular economy needs both public
and private investment. The government should allocate a budget to support the implementation of
circular economy policy objectives, plans, and schemes. In particular, priority is given to restructuring
public investment into greener investment. Governments at different levels could mobilise financial
resources and allocate them efficiently, for example, by expanding access to financial opportunities.
The government should develop mechanisms and incentives to encourage and support enterprises
to innovate their manufacturing towards resource efficiency, energy savings, and environmental
protection, particularly enterprises applying cleaner production and circular economy principles. It
also prioritises supporting the production and supply of products and services that meet the criteria
of the circular economy. To promote the consumption of such products and services, it can build up
distribution systems and markets of environmentally friendly products and services.
The government can apply a mix of price-based tools to ensure a coherent set of incentives for the
development of a circular economy, for instance, environment-related taxes, fees, and charges that
increase the cost of polluting activities; and extended producer responsibility policy instruments.
In the transit to circular economy and the context of climate-change adaptation measures, Viet
Nam should prepare for the shift in demand of resources. For example, to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, it is necessary to reduce the use of energy from fossil fuels and to increase the use of
renewable energy. The effects of primary and secondary markets of resources and materials need
to be considered.
542
At the same time, the government should foster private investment in
developing a circular economy through various funding methods, including
crowdfunding, leasing, equity participation, grants, loan guarantees, green
bonds, and loans for circular economy projects and businesses. It should
attract private investment in public–private partnerships for infrastructure
development for green industries and eco-industrial parks, circular urban
areas, organic agriculture, and environmental services.
To diversify capital sources, the government can also call for financial aid and
foreign investment from other countries. The government should enhance
the ability to attract official development assistance (ODA) and increase the
investment rate for circular economy development from ODA. Localities can
set up specific circular economy development projects in their provinces to
attract ODA capital, supporting projects related to the efficient and economical
use of natural resources and waste reduction.
Develop a road map. The Framework for Circular Economy for the ASEAN
Economic Community sets out an ambitious long-term vision of the circular
economy, building on the strengths of existing ASEAN initiatives, and
identifies priority focus areas for action, along with enablers, to accelerate the
realisation of a circular economy in ASEAN. It guides ASEAN in achieving its
long-term goals of a resilient economy, resource efficiency, and sustainable
and inclusive growth.
To set a pathway for the transition to a circular economy in line with the
region, the government should consider the comprehensive integration of
five strategic priorities in the framework into the relevant national policies,
strategies, and action plans. The integration should focus on possible short-
term, medium-term, and long-term initiatives in priority areas and refer to
the potential funding, institutional coordination, and regulations to support the
transition to the circular economy in Viet Nam. The government should call
for the support of ASEAN in facilitating knowledge sharing, identifying areas
for possible collaboration, and providing policy recommendations to integrate
ASEAN’s visions into the transition to the circular economy in Viet Nam.
543
8.3. Road Map for a Circular Economy in Viet Nam
Based on the analysis of the existing orientation, policies, and legal regulations in Viet Nam;
consultation results with organisations and individuals in specific industries and fields; assessment
of opportunities and challenges in application of a circular economy in specific industries and fields;
the authors propose a road map with strategic measures to promote the transition to a circular
economy in Viet Nam (Table 17.8).
Table 17.8. Proposed Plan for Priority Products, Sectors, and Fields
in the Circular Economy Road Map for Viet Nam
Goal
No. Area Strategic
Measure
2025 2030 2045
A Products
544
Goal
No. Area Strategic
Measure
2025 2030 2045
B Industry
545
Goal
No. Area Strategic
Measure
2025 2030 2045
546
Goal
No. Area Strategic
Measure
2025 2030 2045
547
Goal
No. Area Strategic
Measure
2025 2030 2045
C Locations
D Consumption
548
Goal
No. Area Strategic
Measure
2025 2030 2045
Linkage models x • Develop linkage models, and share models in use of materials
and waste.
in production and • Encourage the establishment of cooperative groups,
business towards cooperatives, unions of cooperatives, recycling alliances,
regional linkage models, urban–rural linkages, and other
circular economy models as prescribed by law that satisfy circular economy
criteria.
549
References
Anbumozhi, V. (2022), ‘Role of Innovation and Digital Transformation to Promote the Circular Economy’, in
Institute of Strategy, Policy on Natural Resources and Environment, Promoting Innovation toward
Actualizing the Circular Economy in Viet Nam, Ha Noi: Institute of Strategy, Policy on Natural
Resources and Environment.
Anbumozhi, V. and F. Kimura (2018), ‘Industry 4.0: What Does It Mean for the Circular Economy in ASEAN?’
in V. Anbumozhi and F. Kimura (eds.), Industry 4.0: Empowering ASEAN for the Circular Economy,
Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
Bianchini, A., J. Rossi, and M. Pellegrini (2019), ‘Overcoming the Main Barriers of Circular Economy
Implementation through a New Visualization Tool for Circular Business Models’, Sustainability,
11(23), p.6,614.
Bocken, N., K. Miller, and S. Evans, (2016), ‘Assessing the Environmental Impact of New Circular Business
Models’, paper presented at the First International Conference on New Business Models–Exploring
a Changing View on Organizing Value Creation, Toulouse, 16–17 June.
Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) (2021), Framework for Circular Economy for
the ASEAN Economic Community, Jakarta, https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/Multimedia/2021_
October_Framework-for-Circular-Economy-for-the-ASEAN-Economic-Community.pdf
Ellen MacArthur Foundation, The Butterfly Diagram: Visualising the Circular Economy, https://
ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy-diagram
European Commission (EC) (2018), Communication from the Commission to European Parliament, the
Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: On a
Monitoring Framework for the Circular Economy, EURLex, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/
EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A29%3AFIN
Global Environment Centre Foundation (GEC) (2005), Research on Eco-Towns in Japan: Implications and
Lessons for Developing Countries and Cities, Osaka.
Government of Japan, Ministry of the Environment (MOE) (2010), Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle
Society: Milestone toward a Sound Material-Cycle Society through Changes in Business and Life
Styles, Tokyo, https://www.env.go.jp/content/900453391.pdf
550
Government of Japan, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) (1998), Act on Recycling of Specified
Home Appliances, https://www.meti.go.jp/policy/recycle/main/english/law/home.html
Government of Viet Nam, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (2021), Development Plan of
Organic Agriculture, 2020–2030, Ho Chi Minh City.
Hotta, Y., A. Santo, and T. Tasaki (2014), ‘EPR-Based Electronic Home Appliance Recycling System under
Home Appliance Recycling Act of Japan’, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD), https://www.oecd.org/environment/waste/EPR_Japan_HomeAppliance.pdf
International Finance Corporation (IFC) (2016), Climate Investment Opportunities in Emerging Markets,
https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/59260145-ec2e-40de-97e6-3aa78b82b3c9/3503-IFC-
Climate_Investment_Opportunity-Report-Dec-FINAL.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=lBLd6Xq
Matsuya, H. (2013), ‘Satoyama as a Model for Sustainability’ paper presented at the International Symposium
on Green Economy and Ecovillages in Viet Nam, Tokyo: Hilltop Press.
Morl, A. (2015), Delivering the Circular Economy: A Toolkit for Policymakers, Isle of Wight: Ellen MacArthur
Foundation.
Nippon Koei Vietnam International (2022), Survey on Circular Economy in Viet Nam, Ha Noi: Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA), 2022.
Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2011), Resource Productivity in the G8
and the OECD: A Report in the Framework of the Kobe 3R Action Plan, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/
env/waste/47944428.pdf
––––– (2018), International Trade and the Transition to a Circular Economy, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/
environment/waste/policy-highlights-international-trade-and-the-transition-to-a-circular-economy.pdf
––––– (2019), The Circular Economy in Cities and Regions, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/cfe/
regionaldevelopment/Circular-economy-brochure.pdf
Soufani, K. (ed.) (2020), A Framework for Pairing Circular Economy and the Internet of Things, https://www.
ce-iot.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/CE-IoT-D2.2.pdf
551
Viet Nam Circular Economy, Decision No. 687/QD-TTg Dated June 07, 2022 on Approving the Scheme
for Circular Economy Development in Vietnam, https://vietnamcirculareconomy.vn/en/policy-
library/decision-no-687-qd-ttg-dated-june-07-2022-on-approving-the-scheme-for-circular-
economy-development-in-vietnam/#:~:text=Decision%20No.-,687%2FQD%2DTTg%20dated%20
June%2007%2C%202022%20on%20approving,circular%20economy%20development%20in%20
Vietnam&text=On%20June%207%2C%202022%2C%20the,circular%20economy%20in%20
Viet%20Nam.
WEEEForum (2012), ’The Challenge of Transposing WEEE II into National Law’, Issues Papers, Brussels.
Wolf, M.J. et al. (2022), 2022 Environmental Performance Index, New Haven, CT: Yale Center for
Environmental Law and Policy.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (2022), Global Innovation Index 2022, Geneva, https://
www.globalinnovationindex.org/Home
552