God and Christ in Irenaeus 1st Edition Anthony

Briggman Updated 2025

https://ebookmass.com/product/god-and-christ-in-irenaeus-1st-
edition-anthony-briggman/

★★★★★
4.9 out of 5.0 (20 reviews )

Instant PDF Download

ebookmass.com
 God and Christ in Irenaeus 1st Edition Anthony Briggman Pdf
Download

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 EDUCATIONAL COLLECTION - LIMITED TIME

INSTANT DOWNLOAD VIEW LIBRARY

We have selected some products that you may be interested in
Click the link to download now or visit ebookmass.com
for more options!.

Coronavirus and Christ John Piper

https://ebookmass.com/product/coronavirus-and-christ-john-piper/

Unity and Catholicity in Christ: The Ecclesiology of

Francisco Suarez, S.J. Eric J Demeuse

https://ebookmass.com/product/unity-and-catholicity-in-christ-the-
ecclesiology-of-francisco-suarez-s-j-eric-j-demeuse/

Catalogue of music in the Library of Christ Church, Oxford

Christ Church (University Of Oxford). Library

https://ebookmass.com/product/catalogue-of-music-in-the-library-of-
christ-church-oxford-christ-church-university-of-oxford-library/

Making Christ Present in China: Actor-Network Theory and

the Anthropology of Christianity 1st Edition Michel
Chambon
https://ebookmass.com/product/making-christ-present-in-china-actor-
network-theory-and-the-anthropology-of-christianity-1st-edition-
michel-chambon/
Knowing Emotions: Truthfulness and Recognition in
Affective Experience 1st Edition Rick Anthony Furtak

https://ebookmass.com/product/knowing-emotions-truthfulness-and-
recognition-in-affective-experience-1st-edition-rick-anthony-furtak/

The Contradictory Christ Jc Beall

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-contradictory-christ-jc-beall/

Reflections on God and the Death of God: Philosophy,

Spirituality, and Religion Richard White

https://ebookmass.com/product/reflections-on-god-and-the-death-of-god-
philosophy-spirituality-and-religion-richard-white/

Violent God (The Defiant God Brotherhood Book 1) Sarah

Bale

https://ebookmass.com/product/violent-god-the-defiant-god-brotherhood-
book-1-sarah-bale/

Death in Fancy Dress Anthony Gilbert

https://ebookmass.com/product/death-in-fancy-dress-anthony-gilbert/
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

OXFORD EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES

General Editors
Gillian Clark Andrew Louth
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

THE OXFORD EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES series includes scholarly volumes on

the thought and history of the early Christian centuries. Covering a wide range of Greek,
Latin, and Oriental sources, the books are of interest to theologians, ancient historians, and
specialists in the classical and Jewish worlds.
Titles in the series include:
Liturgy and Byzantinization in Jerusalem
Daniel Galadza (2017)
The Roman Martyrs
Introduction, Translations, and Commentary
Michael Lapidge (2017)
Philo of Alexandria and the Construction of Jewishness
in Early Christian Writings
Jennifer Otto (2018)
St Theodore the Studite’s Defence of the Icons
Theology and Philosophy in Ninth-Century Byzantium
Torstein Theodor Tollefsen (2018)
Gregory of Nyssa’s Doctrinal Works
A Literary Study
Andrew Radde-Gallwitz (2018)
The Donatist Church in an Apocalyptic Age
Jesse A. Hoover (2018)
The Minor Prophets as Christian Scripture in the Commentaries of
Theodore of Mopsuestia and Cyril of Alexandria
Hauna T. Ondrey (2018)
Preaching Christology in the Roman Near East
A Study of Jacob of Serugh
Philip Michael Forness (2018)
Augustine’s Early Thought on the Redemptive Function of Divine Judgment
Bart van Egmond (2018)
The Idea of Nicaea in the Early Church Councils, AD 431–451
Mark S. Smith (2019)
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

God and Christ

in Irenaeus
ANTHONY BRIGGMAN

1
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Anthony Briggman 2019
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
First Edition published in 2019
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2018950111
ISBN 978–0–19–879256–7
Printed and bound in Great Britain by
Clays Ltd, Elcograf S.p.A.
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

For Kate
optima puellula in mundo
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

Acknowledgments

This book would not have come to be if I had not come to Candler School of
Theology six years ago. So, it is right for me to first thank Jan Love, Candler’s
Dean, for taking a risk and hiring this one-time adjunct professor. Beyond
giving me a chance to prove myself, Jan with Ian McFarland, then Associate
Dean of Faculty and Academic Affairs, approved a Teaching and Research
Grant that funded a portion of the research for Chapter 1. Chapter 5 and a
portion of Chapter 3 were written during a semester’s leave funded by the
Emory University Research Committee. I am grateful for the financial support
of these grants, but also for the encouragement that came with them.
During the course of pursuing this research, I have learned what it means to
be a member of faculty. Beyond the establishment of treasured friendships,
I have been the beneficiary of wise counsel and considerable encouragement.
Candler’s most senior faculty have been unfailingly generous in these ways,
and their words have formed and shaped my thinking on matters too
numerous to mention. I think especially of my emails and conversations
with Carl Holladay, Luke Timothy Johnson, Carol Newsom, David Pacini,
and Philip Reynolds. Two of my colleagues, Philip Reynolds and Jonathan
Strom, left their intellectual fingerprints on this book when they solved a
mystery that had baffled me for well over a year (you can read about it in my
essay on theological speculation in Chapter 1). Colleagues beyond Emory
also read that essay on theological speculation and assured me I had not lost
my mind: I’m grateful for the time (and the psychological support) given by
Mark DelCogliano and Jackson Lashier.
I must thank Tom Perridge at Oxford University Press for first inviting me
to submit a proposal for this book and then for awaiting a good one. Karen
Raith ably managed the production process, kindly kept in touch, and
patiently awaited the receipt of certain very late forms. Christine Ranft’s
copyediting process brought the text into fine form. I am very pleased to
have this study join my first in Oxford Early Christian Studies. Gillian Clark
and Andrew Louth continue to direct the series as well as ever, ensuring its
vitality and continuing significance.
This book is much better—and far more useful—thanks to the diligence of
three of my doctoral students. Grayden McCashen sought out all the refer-
ences in the Index Locorum. Micah Miller spent hours checking and format-
ting the pages that follow, as well as constructing the Bibliography and the
General Index. Amanda Knight saved the day. I am deeply grateful to each
of them.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

viii Acknowledgments
Portions of Chapters 1 and 4 have appeared previously in press, in earlier
forms, as “Irenaeus’ Christology of Mixture,” JTS 64.2 (2013): 516–55;
“Irenaeus on Natural Knowledge,” CHRC 95.2 (2015): 133–54; “Literary
and Rhetorical Theory in Irenaeus, Part 1,” VC 69.5 (2015): 500–27; and
“Theological Speculation in Irenaeus: Perils and Possibilities,” VC 71.2
(2017): 175–98.
Writing a book places particular pressures and stresses upon one’s family.
I’ve found that pressure and stress reveal character, and I am ever grateful to
have married a woman with the character of my wife. Kelly is our family’s
North Star: her ideals and convictions keep us true. I don’t know where I’d be
without her, but I know this book wouldn’t be done. Over the course of writing
this study our daughter, Kate, grew from a precocious four-year-old, who
“graded” papers and read books under my desk, into the most intelligent, kind,
loving, and funny ten-year-old I have ever known. She is the best little girl in
the whole world. This book is dedicated to her.
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

Contents

Abbreviations xi

Introduction 1
1. Prolegomena 9
1.1. Rhetorical Education 10
1.1.1. Hypothesis (ὑπόθεσις) 11
1.1.2. Œconomia (οἰκονομία) 23
1.1.3. Fiction (πλάσμα and μῦθος) 29
1.1.4. Section Conclusion 32
1.2. Theological Speculation 33
1.2.1. The Current Narrative 35
1.2.2. Critique and New Reading 39
1.2.3. Section Conclusion 51
1.3. Natural Knowledge 52
1.3.1. Angelic or Angelic and Human Knowledge? 54
1.3.2. Natural Knowing or Knowing Aided by God? 58
1.3.3. Ratio: Natural Reasoning or the Divine Word? 63
1.3.4. Section Conclusion 69
1.4. Chapter Conclusion 69
2. God 71
2.1. God is Infinite 72
2.1.1. Transcendence 79
2.1.2. Incomprehensibility 80
2.1.3. Immanence 87
2.2. God is Simple 90
2.3. God is Spirit 99
2.4. Chapter Conclusion 102
3. Word-Son 104
3.1. Reciprocal Immanence 107
3.2. Logical Foundation of Reciprocal Immanence 115
3.3. Divine Production 121
3.4. Chapter Conclusion 136
4. Christological Union 139
4.1. Stoic Mixture Theory 140
4.2. Appropriation of Mixture Theory in Early Christianity 146
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

x Contents
4.3. Mixture in Irenaeus 152
4.3.1. Mixture’s Union 153
4.3.2. Mixture of Body and Soul 155
4.3.3. Mixture Christology 163
4.4. Chapter Conclusion 179
5. Christ and his Work 181
5.1. Security, Incorruptibility, Adoption 181
5.1.1. Section Conclusion 186
5.2. Revelatory Activity 186
5.2.1. Section Conclusion 203
5.3. Chapter Conclusion 204
Conclusion 205

Bibliography 211
Index Locorum 223
Scripture Index 228
General Index 229
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

Abbreviations

ACW Ancient Christian Writers

AH Against Heresies
ANF The Ante-Nicene Fathers
ATR Anglican Theological Review
BICS Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London
ETL Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses
FotC The Fathers of the Church
Greg Gregorianum
HTR Harvard Theological Review
JECS Journal of Early Christian Studies
JrnRel Journal of Religion
JTS Journal of Theological Studies
LCL Loeb Classical Library
NRT Nouvelle Revue Théologique
NTS New Testament Studies
NV Nova et Vetera
PA Philosophia Antiqua
PG Patrologia Graeca
PO Patrologia Orientalis
PPS Popular Patristics Series
Prf Proof of the Apostolic Preaching
ProEcc Pro Ecclesia
RevEA Revue des Études Anciennes
RevEAug Revue d’Études Augustiniennes
RevEG Revue des Études Grecques
RevSR Revue des Sciences Religieuses
RevUO Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa
RSR Recherches de Science Religieuse
RTAM Recherches de Théologie Ancienne et Médiévale
SC Sources Chrétiennes
SLI Studies in the Literary Imagination
SP Studia Patristica
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

xii Abbreviations
ST Studia Theologica
VC Vigiliae Christianae
ZAC Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum
ZNW Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und Kunde der Alteren
Kirche
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

Now the splendor of God gives life; therefore, those who see God partici-
pate in life. And for this reason the one who is uncontainable and
incomprehensible and invisible renders himself visible and comprehen-
sible and graspable, in order that he may give life to those who grasp and
see him. For just as his greatness is inscrutable, so also is his goodness
ineffable; by which, having been seen, he bestows life on those who see
him. For it is not possible to live without life, and the means of life comes
from participation in God, and participation in God is to see God and to
enjoy his goodness.
Irenaeus, Against Heresies 4.20.5
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

Introduction

I never planned to write this book. Toward the end of working on my first
book, Irenaeus of Lyons and the Theology of the Holy Spirit, I found myself
thinking more and more about Ronald Heine’s seminal article on early
Christology, “The Christology of Callistus.”¹ Heine spends considerable time
analyzing the Roman Monarchian use of Stoic mixture theory—namely,
blending (κρᾶσις)—to explain the union of the divine and human in the
person of Christ. This caught my attention, for Irenaeus too refers to the
Christological union as a mixture, but no one had ever investigated its
significance. So, upon sending to Oxford the proofs of the first book, I began
reading Irenaeus again. I soon decided that I had something to say about
Irenaeus’ Christological appropriation of mixture theory. Still more, my sense
that there was something amiss in scholarly construals of Irenaeus’ doctrine of
God and his understanding of the person of Christ had solidified. Around this
time the exigencies of tenure were made clear to me, and another book on
Irenaeus was born.
When it comes to the history of Christian thought, Irenaeus is most famous
as the greatest opponent of Gnosticism in the early Church. Until the finds of
Nag Hammadi, Irenaeus’ corpus represented the greatest cache of informa-
tion about Gnostic thought we possessed. For that reason his polemic has
received considerable attention and at times his polemical significance has
overshadowed his importance as a theologian. But a focus on his polemical
significance was not the only thing that discouraged nuanced analysis of his
theological account. For his theological ability and even intelligence have been
impugned for generations.
The coherence of Irenaeus’ thought was first questioned by Hans Wendt in
1882.² Wendt argued that Irenaeus maintained two incompatible strains of
thought with regard to the original state of humanity: one that involved
the notion of a continual growth and increase toward perfection in which the
Fall plays a positive role, and another that involved the notion of an original

¹ Heine, JTS 49 (1998: 56–91). ² Wendt (1882).

OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

2 God and Christ in Irenaeus

perfection lost at the Fall.³ Many have followed Wendt’s evaluation of Irenaeus’
thought, including Adolf von Harnack⁴ and, most importantly, Friedrich
Loofs.⁵ The discernment of incompatible lines of thought in Irenaeus’ work
became the logical grounds for Loofs’ source-critical division of Against Heresies
which led him to regard Irenaeus as a mere compiler of the ideas that came
before him.⁶ Irenaeus, according to Loofs, “was as a theological writer much less
important” than we had supposed.⁷
Loofs’s theory and evaluation did not go unchallenged for long. A few years
later D.B. Reynders wrote, “Adverses haereses is the fruit of a great work . . . If
it lacks a little order and if it repeats itself, it is neither without unity nor
without erudition nor without method . . . Irenaeus has taken a position (on
the problem of God, the world, and knowledge) too firm and too perceptive
to be something other than the spontaneous expression of his psychology.”⁸
Over the succeeding decades other studies followed, each substantiating the
coherence of Irenaeus’ thought and the unity of his work.⁹ Consensus
shifted rapidly, so much so that Aloys Grillmeier could soon write, “Irenaeus
scholarship has once again come back to recognizing the inner unity of the
theology of the Bishop of Lyons.”¹⁰ But it was left to Philippe Bacq to
conclusively establish the unity of Irenaeus’ writing, as well as the harmo-
nious existence of the two debated strains of thought, in his analysis of the
fourth book of Against Heresies.¹¹
Still, the failure to recognize the intellectual unity as well as the plan of
Irenaeus’ polemical and constructive argumentation contributed to a low
regard for his intellectual ability in general.¹² Within three decades of Wendt’s
initial evaluation, Paul Beuzart concluded that Irenaeus “n’est pas de tout
premier rang comme penseur mais dont l’influence a été extrêmement grande

³ Wendt (1882: 21–6, 29). These lines of thought were first raised by L. Duncker, who
discussed the image and likeness of God in Irenaeus, but affirmed the internal consistency of his
logic (1843: 99–104).
⁴ von Harnack (1901, vol. 2: 269–74, esp. 274 n. 1). ⁵ Loofs (1930: 1–4).
⁶ A. Benoît has noted the parallel between the rise of the source-critical and form-critical
treatments of Scripture and the application of these approaches to Irenaeus (1960: 38). Though
Benoît critiqued the merit of Loofs’s approach (1960: 33–5), H.-I. Marrou has shown that Benoît
himself failed to grasp the unity of Irenaeus’ thought (RevEA 65 1963: 452–6).
⁷ Loofs (1930: 432). ⁸ Reynders, RTAM 7 (1935: 5–27, here 26–7).
⁹ F.R.M. Hitchcock soon offered a stringent critique of Loofs’s methodology and conclusions
(JTS 38 1937: 130–9, 255–66). G. Wingren then proposed a harmonious reading of the two lines
of thought previously assessed as irreconcilable (1959: esp. 26–32, 50–4, 52 n. 33, on p. 27 n. 78).
A. Rousseau aligned himself with Wingren and declared, “If one wants to have some chance of
getting back to the thought of a writer, one ought not first seek to discover in him borrowings and
plagiarisms—as if it would suffice to make then a simple subtraction so that the residue thus
obtained represents the contribution belonging to the author!” (SC 152 1969: 190).
¹⁰ Grillmeier (1965; 2nd ed. 1975, vol. 1: 98).
¹¹ Bacq (1978), see esp. his appendix devoted to AH 4.37–9, pp. 363–88, which includes a
discussion of past scholarship on this issue, pp. 364–9.
¹² As may be seen in Loofs’s evaluation, related above.
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

Introduction 3
dans l’ordre practique.”¹³ Such opinions took hold quickly. The narrative was
so fixed by the middle of last century that Johannes Quasten wrote in his
standard Patrology, “The whole work suffers from a lack of clear arrangement
and unity of thought. Prolixity and frequent repetition make its perusal
wearisome. . . . Evidently he did not have the ability to shape his materials
into a homogenous whole.”¹⁴ A few years later Philip Hefner wrote, “Irenaeus’
use of terms in this treatise is so fluid, at points even ambiguous, and the man’s
naïveté at times so great, that any interpreter must be cautious in applying
sharp distinctions and sophisticated schematisms to Irenaeus’ theological
work.”¹⁵ More recently, Denis Minns, who stands in this tradition of inter-
pretation, described Irenaeus as “unwitting” and “naïve.”¹⁶
Yet, just as the failure to recognize the intellectual unity and plan of
Irenaeus’ argumentation often led to a low regard for his intellectual ability,
the recognition of its intellectual unity and plan led to a renewed appreciation
for his theological account. So it was that six years after Bacq Hans Urs von
Balthasar said, “Irenaeus’ work marks the birth of Christian theology. With it,
theology merges as a reflection on the world of revealed facts, a reflection
which is not just a tentative, partial approximation but achieves the miracle of
a complete and organized image in the mind of faith.”¹⁷
But while a few undertook nuanced and subtle investigations into aspects of
Irenaeus’ theology,¹⁸ other narratives besetting the scholarly imagination
continued to discourage investigation into the most fundamental of theologic-
al articles. Irenaeus, it was said, strictly opposed theological speculation¹⁹ and
had little interest in philosophical reasoning.²⁰ As a result, scholarship on

¹³ Beuzart (1908: 169). ¹⁴ Quasten (1950, vol.1: 289).

¹⁵ Hefner, JrnRel 44 (1964: 294–309, here 304). ¹⁶ Minns (1994, repr. 2010: xi, 69).
¹⁷ Von Balthasar (1984, vol. 2: 31).
¹⁸ E.g., Fantino (1986) and Fantino (1994), as well as Behr (2000).
¹⁹ Von Harnack (1901, vol. 2: 233 n. 3, 263); Bonwetsch (1925: 62); Audet Traditio 1 (1943:
15–54, esp. 51–3); Grant HTR 42 (1949: 41–51, esp. 46–7); Grant (1952: 79–81); Schoedel, VC 13
(1959: 22–32, esp. 23–4, 30); and Schoedel, JTS 35 (1984: 31–49). J. Daniélou’s opinion both
instantiated and advanced this narrative: “In this particular sector of theology (viz., the Trini-
tarian relations), however, it must be admitted that the Gnostics, even if they are bad theologians,
are at any rate more of theologians than Irenaeus, who for the most part refuses to step outside
the biblical formulas. It was not here that his interest lay, but in the theology of the Word as
Revealer, the subject of which he is the great Doctor” (1973: 357).
²⁰ Much of the impetus for, and possibly the beginning of, this narrative lies in G. Bardy’s
declaration that Irenaeus is not a philosopher: “[Irenaeus] ne combat pas la sagesse profane; il
se contente de la dédaigner” (1928: 36). The standing of this narrative in the second and
third quarters of the last century may be illustrated by reference to the similar opinions of
W.R. Schoedel and R.M. Grant. According to Schoedel, Irenaeus’ acquaintance with higher
philosophy was confined to doxographical material and possibly a Peripatetic source, conclud-
ing: “But beyond that there seems to have been little or no direct philosophical influence upon
him. In any event Irenaeus was himself conscious of little interest in philosophy” (VC 13 1959:
32). Grant likewise asserts: “Irenaeus’ sole purpose in discussing early Greek philosophy is to
show that Gnostic ideas are derived from it. . . . Only when he does not recognize an idea as
philosophical can he accept it” (1965: 365). Twenty years later Grant’s evaluation of Irenaeus
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

4 God and Christ in Irenaeus

Irenaeus’ conceptions of the divine being and the person of Christ is remark-
ably thin for one identified as the “father of western theology.”²¹
Indeed, Irenaeus’ conception of the divine being—his theology proper—has
not a single book devoted to its analysis. Jules Lebreton offered an enduring
discussion in his Histoire du Dogme de la Trinité.²² In the third quarter of the
last century contributions by Robert M. Grant, William Schoedel, Richard
Norris, and W.C. van Unnik illuminated key aspects of Irenaeus’ account.²³
Since that time, substantial treatments can be found only in articles by Richard
Norris and Michel René Barnes, as well as Jackson Lashier’s Irenaeus on the
Trinity.²⁴ No scholar has ever attempted to produce a synthetic analysis that
takes into consideration the themes addressed by each of these studies.
There has, moreover, never been a book in English devoted to Irenaeus’
conception of the person of Christ. The only book in any language that comes
close to having such a focus is Albert Houssiau’s La Christologie de Saint
Irénée.²⁵ Houssiau observed that previous studies of Irenaeus’ Christology
focused upon the problems related to his theology of salvation rather than
Christology proper. His objective was to provide a counterbalance by focusing
his work on Irenaeus’ conception of the person of Christ. He succeeded,
providing the best study of Irenaeus’ Christology to date. But even Houssiau’s
volume spends more than half its pages focusing on the Christological
accounts of Irenaeus’ opponents; as a result many central themes receive
only a cursory examination.
Because of the states of these questions we do not possess a thorough or
even certain understanding of Irenaeus’ doctrines of God and the person of
Christ. Neither are we able to grasp Irenaeus’ account of the standing of the
Word-Son in relation to God the Father, nor fully comprehend his attribution
of divinity to Jesus Christ, nor recognize how central aspects of his account
of the economic activity of Christ are grounded upon his understanding of
the divine being. But that is not all, for Richard Norris’s fears have come to

remained constant: “In his opinion truth is to be found only within the church. An instructive
passage shows his dislike of philosophical learning. In natural science ‘many things escape our
knowledge, and we entrust them to God; for he must excel over all. What if we try to set forth the
cause of the rising of the Nile? We say many things, some perhaps persuasive, others perhaps not
persuasive: what is true and certain and sure lies with God’ [2.28.2]” (Grant with Tracy 1984: 50).
Not all accepted this reading, especially as the century progressed. For instance, C. Stead wrote,
Irenaeus “has, I suspect, more philosophical talent than is easy to detect in his surviving
work . . . But when philosophical methods are used, they are ably handled, and one regrets the
disappearance of other works known to Eusebius, especially the treatise arguing that God is not
the author of evil” (1994: 90).
²¹ Grant (1952: 102). ²² Lebreton (1928, vol. 2: 540–75 esp.).
²³ Grant, HTR 42 (1949: 41–51); Schoedel (1972: 88–108); van Unnik (1979: 33–43); Schoedel
(1979: 75–86); and Norris (1979: 87–100).
²⁴ Norris (2009: 9–36); Barnes, NV 7 (2009: 67–106); Lashier (2014: esp. 70–91).
²⁵ Houssiau (1955).
 OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 30/11/2018, SPi

Introduction 5
pass: the neglect of these matters has allowed “serious distortions” to creep
into contemporary appreciations of these facets of Irenaeus’ theology.²⁶
The most “serious distortion” pervading these discussions of Irenaeus’
theology is the minimization of the metaphysical dimension of his thought.
We see this minimization in descriptions of Irenaeus’ theology as economic or
in characterizations of his theology as unconcerned with the Trinitarian
relations and even modalistic—descriptions which have become so common
within certain scholarly circles as to be banal.²⁷ The most recent, and perhaps
the most direct, example of this minimization of the metaphysical comes from
the pen of Michael Slusser.
Slusser argues that Richard Norris—one of the few to highlight the meta-
physical dimension of Irenaeus’ theology—was incorrect to emphasize the
philosophical basis of Irenaeus’ account of the unity and transcendence of
God. According to Slusser, Norris’s “philosophical angle of approach” suggests
Irenaeus was looking for a “metaphysical solution” in the conflict with his
Gnostic opponents, and thus “obscures Irenaeus’ real agenda, which goes
beyond metaphysics and portrays God in terms of love and will. . . . (Irenaeus)
appeals, rather, to a divine initiative that overrides the insuperable metaphys-
ical obstacle constituted by God’s incomprehensibility and magnitude.”²⁸
Slusser is correct to argue that Irenaeus did not simply author a metaphys-
ical response to his Gnostic opponents.²⁹ But he is incorrect to minimize the
importance of metaphysics to Irenaeus’ response and to characterize meta-
physics as an obstacle that Irenaeus had to overcome by emphasizing the
divine economy.³⁰ Far from being an obstacle that must be overcome by the
economy, metaphysics is the foundation for key elements of Irenaeus’ account
of the divine economy. This is the fundamental insight into Irenaeus’ thought
that lies at the origin of this investigation.
The purpose of this study is to elucidate the metaphysical dimension of
Irenaeus’ thought, namely, his understanding of the divine being, his account
of the standing of the Word-Son in relation to God the Father, his conception
of how the divine Word-Son is united to humanity in the person of Christ
(which ironically depends upon Stoic physics), and the manner in which he
grounds central aspects of his account of the economic activity of Christ upon
his understanding of the divine being and the divinity of the Word-Son.

²⁶ Norris (1979: 89).

²⁷ I document these characterizations of Irenaeus’ theology in Chapter 3, footnotes 2–4.
²⁸ Slusser (2012: 133–9, here 135).
²⁹ This is not to suggest that Norris wholly neglects the economic aspect of Irenaeus’ thought;
he does not.
³⁰ Slusser’s perspective suits the ubiquitous characterization of Irenaeus’ theology as econom-
ic in orientation. The upcoming chapters will challenge that description of Irenaeus’ theology. In
so doing, I agree with Lashier who recently authored his own challenge to this reading of
Irenaeus (2014).
Another Random Scribd Document
with Unrelated Content
 Computer Science - Workbook
Second 2021 - University

Prepared by: Teacher Williams

Date: August 12, 2025

Discussion 1: Research findings and conclusions

Learning Objective 1: Literature review and discussion
• Statistical analysis and interpretation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Learning Objective 2: Research findings and conclusions
• Learning outcomes and objectives
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Learning Objective 3: Ethical considerations and implications
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Learning Objective 4: Ethical considerations and implications
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 4: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Learning Objective 5: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Historical development and evolution
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Experimental procedures and results
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 7: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Key Concept: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Best practices and recommendations
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Appendix 2: Statistical analysis and interpretation
Definition: Research findings and conclusions
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 11: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Definition: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 13: Experimental procedures and results
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 14: Historical development and evolution
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Important: Experimental procedures and results
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Current trends and future directions
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 17: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Definition: Practical applications and examples
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Historical development and evolution
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 19: Case studies and real-world applications
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Results 3: Key terms and definitions
Note: Best practices and recommendations
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Literature review and discussion
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Literature review and discussion
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 23: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Example 23: Current trends and future directions
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Important: Research findings and conclusions
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Current trends and future directions
• Learning outcomes and objectives
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Best practices and recommendations
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Current trends and future directions
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 28: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Important: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Introduction 4: Comparative analysis and synthesis
Remember: Research findings and conclusions
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Key Concept: Current trends and future directions
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Remember: Case studies and real-world applications
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Assessment criteria and rubrics
• Learning outcomes and objectives
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 34: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 34: Literature review and discussion
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Practical applications and examples
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Definition: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Note: Key terms and definitions
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 38: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Key Concept: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Chapter 5: Theoretical framework and methodology
Important: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 41: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Example 41: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
[Figure 42: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Key Concept: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Example 43: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Remember: Historical development and evolution
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 45: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 46: Best practices and recommendations
• Statistical analysis and interpretation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Practice Problem 47: Practical applications and examples
• Statistical analysis and interpretation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Remember: Experimental procedures and results
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 49: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Key Concept: Case studies and real-world applications
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge

connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and

personal growth every day!

ebookmasss.com