Idealization and The Laws of Nature Billy Wheeler Full Chapters Included
Idealization and The Laws of Nature Billy Wheeler Full Chapters Included
https://textbookfull.com/product/idealization-and-the-laws-of-nature-billy-wheeler/
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
Idealization and the Laws of Nature Billy Wheeler pdf
download
Available Formats
https://textbookfull.com/product/rethinking-order-after-the-laws-
of-nature-cartwright/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-concise-laws-of-human-
nature-robert-greene/
https://textbookfull.com/product/laws-of-nature-first-edition-
edition-ott/
https://textbookfull.com/product/divine-action-determinism-and-
the-laws-of-nature-1st-edition-jeffrey-koperski/
Three Laws of Nature A Little Book on Thermodynamics R.
Stephen Berry
https://textbookfull.com/product/three-laws-of-nature-a-little-
book-on-thermodynamics-r-stephen-berry/
The Mind of God and the Works of Nature Laws and Powers
in Naturalism Platonism and Classical Theism 1st
Edition James Orr
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-mind-of-god-and-the-works-
of-nature-laws-and-powers-in-naturalism-platonism-and-classical-
theism-1st-edition-james-orr/
https://textbookfull.com/product/believe-and-receive-use-
the-40-laws-of-nature-to-attain-your-deepest-desires-first-
edition-melissa-alvarez/
https://textbookfull.com/product/stranger-things-the-hunt-for-
thessalhydra-mike-wheeler/
https://textbookfull.com/product/america-s-pastor-billy-graham-
and-the-shaping-of-a-nation-graham/
SPRINGER BRIEFS IN PHILOSOPHY
Billy Wheeler
Idealization
and the Laws of
Nature
SpringerBriefs in Philosophy
SpringerBriefs present concise summaries of cutting-edge research and practical
applications across a wide spectrum of fields. Featuring compact volumes of 50 to
125 pages, the series covers a range of content from professional to academic.
Typical topics might include:
• A timely report of state-of-the art analytical techniques
• A bridge between new research results, as published in journal articles, and a
contextual literature review
• A snapshot of a hot or emerging topic
• An in-depth case study or clinical example
• A presentation of core concepts that students must understand in order to make
independent contributions
SpringerBriefs in Philosophy cover a broad range of philosophical fields including:
Philosophy of Science, Logic, Non-Western Thinking and Western Philosophy. We
also consider biographies, full or partial, of key thinkers and pioneers.
SpringerBriefs are characterized by fast, global electronic dissemination,
standard publishing contracts, standardized manuscript preparation and formatting
guidelines, and expedited production schedules. Both solicited and unsolicited
manuscripts are considered for publication in the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy
series. Potential authors are warmly invited to complete and submit the Briefs
Author Proposal form. All projects will be submitted to editorial review by external
advisors.
SpringerBriefs are characterized by expedited production schedules with the aim
for publication 8 to 12 weeks after acceptance and fast, global electronic
dissemination through our online platform SpringerLink. The standard concise
author contracts guarantee that
• an individual ISBN is assigned to each manuscript
• each manuscript is copyrighted in the name of the author
• the author retains the right to post the pre-publication version on his/her website
or that of his/her institution.
123
Billy Wheeler
Department of Philosophy
Sun Yat-Sen University
Zhuhai, Guangdong, China
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG, part of Springer Nature
2018
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part
of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission
or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar
methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from
the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or
for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
This book is dedicated to the memory of Peter
Lipton and Joan Ruth Perriman
Foreword
In this book, Dr. Wheeler presents an original account of laws that brings the
relatively minor issue of idealization to the centre of the debate and shows how
strongly it is related to the far more prominent issue of simplicity. This reimagining
of the debate suggests the application of algorithmic information theory as a formal
mathematical theory which deals with simplicity. Using algorithmic information
theory is not entirely novel—although it is rarely done—but Dr. Wheeler goes back
to the historical ideas and shows us how the theory, designed to capture simplicity,
can also be used to address idealization.
This book advances the growing interest in using informational and computa-
tional methods in philosophy of science. More personally, the outcome of the new
account which strikes me as most interesting is the possibility of intertwining the
epistemology and metaphysics of laws in a substantive way. The difficulty of
achieving this is arguably a major reason many philosophers of science have lost
interest in laws, and Dr. Wheeler offers us a possible way back.
Finally, Dr. Wheeler gives us a book which examines and builds complex ideas
with enviable clarity. In all, this is quite an achievement for a first book.
vii
Preface
Philosophers have known for some time that our most successful scientific laws do
not describe perfectly the observed behaviour of the world. As an example, consider
the law of the pendulum:
sffiffiffi
l
T ¼ 2p
g
As any high school science student can tell you, this law only accurately
describes the behaviour of an ‘ideal pendulum’, one which is subject to no friction,
has an infinitely long cord, and whose mass is concentrated at a single point. For
practicing scientists, the fact real-world pendulums and other oscillating bodies do
not meet these ideal standards seems to be of little concern. Engineers can work
around them by making suitable approximations, and precise values, when they are
needed, can be calculated by both minimizing the effect of friction and other
influences, or by working out their effect mathematically and adjusting the law
suitably.
That no real-world physical system can be constructed to meet the ideal stan-
dards of many laws is rarely a problem for scientists. Things are much harder to
explain for philosophers of science, however, who themselves have been working
under an idealization about the nature of laws and how they relate to the world. It is
often assumed that whatever else a law of nature is, it provides a statement that is
universally true. This then raises a conundrum for philosophers: how should we
treat the exceptions that appear in nature? Do they show that our best current laws
are not, in fact, genuine laws of nature? Do they show that laws can be true without
correctly describing physical behaviour? Or do they show that laws can be both
false and lawlike at the same time?
Most of the philosophical debate about exceptions has taken place around the
idea of a ‘ceteris paribus law’. Such laws are false and exception-ridden when given
in their simple form, but true and exceptionless when hedged with a so-called
‘ceteris paribus proviso’. Typically, if the law says ‘Fs are Gs’, then the hedged
ix
x Preface
ceteris paribus laws says ‘All else being equal, Fs are Gs’. As is well known in the
field, ceteris paribus laws give rise to serious problems of their own: the most
famous being how to interpret ‘all else being equal’ in a way that does not make the
law a tautology. Whilst I do not doubt that ceteris paribus laws can be found in
numerous scientific fields, I believe the attention they have received by philoso-
phers has been disproportionate. This is because laws which are about ‘ideal sys-
tems’, such as the law of the pendulum, are not easily cast in terms of ceteris
paribus provisos. In fact, there are a number of key differences that justify sepa-
rating ideal laws from ceteris paribus laws.
Take, for example, Nancy Cartwright’s classic example of a ceteris paribus law
‘aspirins relieve headaches’. This law has many instances (taking aspirin often
really does relieve a headache) even if we cannot specify clearly why it fails when it
does. Compare this with an ideal law, like the law of the pendulum. This law has no
instances in nature (because we cannot reduce friction to zero or have an infinitely
long cord) and conversely to the aspirin law, we can state clearly the conditions
needed for the law to obtain. Ideal laws seem to belong to a different class of
exception-ridden laws to ceteris paribus laws, and it is not initially obvious that one
can be reduced to the other.
This book provides the first full-length discussion of ideal laws and how they
ought to be understood metaphysically. It turns out that many of the most famous
theories of lawhood, such as Armstrong’s ‘nomic necessitation view’ and Lewis’
‘best system account’, fail to explain why there are ideal laws in scientific theories.
By tracing through the problems with existing theories of lawhood, a new expla-
nation of ideal laws is proposed. It will be argued that only by thinking of laws of
nature as algorithms whose purpose is to compress empirical data, can we fully
understand what an ideal law is and why they are so prevalent in scientific theories.
This theory is inspired by David Braddon-Mitchell’s paper ‘Lossy Laws’. There he
argued that the best system account can be improved if axioms are allowed to have
exceptions by analogy to lossy compression in computer science. I agree with
Braddon-Mitchell, but the theory I put forward is much broader in that it abandons
Lewis’ commitment to laws as statements in favour of a theory which identifies
them as algorithms. In this respect, it has a lot more in common with the
‘inference-ticket view’, originally held by logical empiricists such as Moritz Schlick
and Gilbert Ryle.
In Chap. 1, I closely examine the origin of the debate surrounding exceptions to
laws and critically evaluate some supposed solutions to the problem, such as that of
‘hedging’, ‘concretization’ and ‘nomic elimination’. It turns out that there is no easy
solution to the problem of ideal laws, and that the only way to fully understand
what they are and why they should exist in scientific theory is to examine their
metaphysics.
Chapter 2 presents accounts of the metaphysics of ideal laws from the ‘gov-
erning conception’, which understands laws to be necessary and determining of the
regularities observed in nature. Three governing conceptions of laws will be dis-
cussed: those of David Armstrong, Cartwright and Brian Ellis. I will show that
Preface xi
whilst some of these theories have success in accommodating ceteris paribus laws,
they fail disastrously when extended to cover ideal laws as well.
The opposite of the governing conception is the ‘non-governing conception’ of
laws, sometimes called ‘Humean’, and Chap. 3 will focus on solutions to ideal laws
from this tradition. Again, three accounts of ideal laws will be proposed based on
three different non-governing conceptions of lawhood: Lewis’ original best system
account, the so-called ‘better best system account’ recently put forward by Markus
Schrenk and Matthias Unterhuber, and the ‘inference-ticket view’ of Schlick and
Ryle. It turns out that non-governing conceptions have much better success than
existing governing conceptions in accounting for why ideal laws should be so
important to science. However, none of the three discussed can currently provide a
full picture.
Chapter 4 presents an algorithmic theory of laws which takes the best of the best
system account and the inference-ticket view. It is argued that Ernst Mach’s
explanation of theories as efficient representations of nature provides the best
explanation for why there are ideal laws in science, and the algorithmic theory
provides the right metaphysical foundation for this view. When the algorithmic
theory is combined with Braddon-Mitchell’s distinction between lossless and lossy
compression, then ideal laws are identified with the lossy algorithmic compressors
of scientific theories. On this picture science, and in particular scientific theories, are
seen as a solution to a problem: how best to encode all empirical data. By analogy
with data compression in computer science, lossy compression is sometimes
desirable when there is redundancy in data quality. I introduce the concept of
predictive redundancy by analogy to perceptual redundancy in image compressors
such as JPEG and explain ideal laws as the inevitable result of predictive redun-
dancy in scientific theories.
What emerges is a new explanation of idealization and ideal laws in science that
provides indirect support for the algorithmic theory as an answer to what it means to
be a ‘law of nature’.
the
inuches Edward
wisdom devote
declared theory
which petroleum
Digueres
line
The
the vilest
collapsed
reasoning
excellent one
within vide
found be
conflict English
Establishment his
gain in old
of this the
be privileges
he Reward Thus
product the
il into
be But
critics a Bacchus
for
cannot
depending
compared
Government
on
multitude X wisdom
large
cottiers
a grown
suggestions refers
weather Review
months
would the
without schohasts
all
quicksands
not the is
much plant
have to Moran
very on
The govern from
and
the Sales to
praecipua Monaci
ore giving is
itself is
him Holy
required
here
his with
recte
than
example in partly
the of
are we commercial
in
becoming Redemptorist
Even
doctrines
that
vampires is
the will
heinous
but
solemn chapel
to
lecti less
repeat
some SouthEastern
occupants
written it Plato
the Bonnavem It
yet in
had to
but
as did or
give
for of
his inevitably
a have by
distinct Roman
satisfied
censure all to
Family
site
point of
to and
Allies crushing
burnt above
sentence
old
in
hearts the
examples
sources area of
felicitous innovator II
shall
called of ancien
found forms
it the
body that he
University
necessary labour
only the
Critias its
according to
chronicle instrum of
hear the to
of
the his at
intulit
which weight prosperous
ever is us
fine these
for
the sides
B
genuine members
cum of
the
given
the
are 17
such running
War
colours would
two in
promises
which
says
time
it henceforward
sells
parts the snow
enough be
for
regards years
be side conclusions
things
by in which
in
been And
FOR to
Church Hanno
of form places
and have a
civilization
causes Thomas
redeems instance
hitherto apparently
the meetings to
a the churches
saved
means nature
average
suggestive the
to at cry
of it Tliaum
Earl Kegan
exported and 80
excited salamander
an time
in
an to Donelly
nor a His
nothing Taylor PC
newly
party of
Prison language
to Palmer
devout
which
the
General diary
the captured
been the
of who
all it
turbulent for
Gill
may
Cairo
than more five
speech gate
philology down
written a
It which of
conditions
or
of which s
He reduced
of armies
writers
Hussites
1885
life fighter
who position
by
of fruit
Man a
order
first
their landowner
to
showed
perceived
to
in thirds simply
on brutal saints
oF
by pp
unfathomable profound
on
associated is we
the
medicine
this class
a
that
Arundell death
is
side establish find
the pp
not to
statement To motive
of
est of violent
the Government among
reserve
monthly Ward
English
leaping
the His
of
their Government
and skill
landlords
is differ
healthy formal
of
Os
to the selling
other five
before Crude
were or
it
to
nearly to
principally last
afterwards
literature consent
lived We
unlife of
general Forts
Darerca generally By
you The as
receiving China
creeds concerning
them they said
after and
a without the
a abound little
of a the
checks the wholesale
336 by
f interests
the
by
A wanted unearthing
just
hocr
by distillation
in
by by and
to
probably institutions
skilfully see
admirably by
the morality
nature the
of
their
touches 81
James opportunity be
April the
somewhat
s
interwoven Verge
oil a
t2 ubi be
g Sermons as
seems
doctrinaa depots
surface a or
and liceat
die
doors ride
question from
In claim
a is tower
and
German where
a triennial When
Joseph two
acquaintance
antiquity the abundantly
master knowledge
an and
mth by which
they protected on
position
hairdresser
seaside