The Vanished World of Lithuanian Jews On the
Boundary of Two Worlds Identity Freedom and
Moral Imagination in the Baltics 1 1st Edition
Alvydas Nikžentaitis pdf download
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-vanished-world-of-lithuanian-jews-on-the-boundary-of-two-worlds-
identity-freedom-and-moral-imagination-in-the-baltics-1-1st-edition-alvydas-nikzentaitis/
★★★★★ 4.6/5.0 (21 reviews) ✓ 104 downloads ■ TOP RATED
"Fantastic PDF quality, very satisfied with download!" - Emma W.
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
The Vanished World of Lithuanian Jews On the Boundary of Two
Worlds Identity Freedom and Moral Imagination in the Baltics
1 1st Edition Alvydas Nikžentaitis pdf download
TEXTBOOK EBOOK EBOOK GATE
Available Formats
■ PDF eBook Study Guide TextBook
EXCLUSIVE 2025 EDUCATIONAL COLLECTION - LIMITED TIME
INSTANT DOWNLOAD VIEW LIBRARY
Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) available
Download now and explore formats that suit you...
Jews and Muslims in the White Supremacist Conspiratorial
Imagination 1st Edition Hirschbein
https://ebookgate.com/product/jews-and-muslims-in-the-white-
supremacist-conspiratorial-imagination-1st-edition-hirschbein/
ebookgate.com
The last Jews of Kerala The two thousand year history of
India s forgotten Jewish community 1. Edition Edna
Fernandes
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-last-jews-of-kerala-the-two-
thousand-year-history-of-india-s-forgotten-jewish-community-1-edition-
edna-fernandes/
ebookgate.com
Twentieth Century Jews Forging Identity in the Land of
Promise and in the Promised Land Monty Noam Penkower
https://ebookgate.com/product/twentieth-century-jews-forging-identity-
in-the-land-of-promise-and-in-the-promised-land-monty-noam-penkower/
ebookgate.com
A land of two peoples Martin Buber on Jews and Arabs
Martin Buber
https://ebookgate.com/product/a-land-of-two-peoples-martin-buber-on-
jews-and-arabs-martin-buber/
ebookgate.com
The Unity of Worlds and of Nature Three Essays on the
Spirit of Inductive Philosophy the Plurality of Worlds and
the Philosophy of Creation 1st Edition Baden Powell
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-unity-of-worlds-and-of-nature-three-
essays-on-the-spirit-of-inductive-philosophy-the-plurality-of-worlds-
and-the-philosophy-of-creation-1st-edition-baden-powell/
ebookgate.com
The History of the Jews in the Greco Roman World The Jews
of Palestine from Alexander the Great to the Arab Conquest
2nd Edition Peter Schäfer
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-history-of-the-jews-in-the-greco-
roman-world-the-jews-of-palestine-from-alexander-the-great-to-the-
arab-conquest-2nd-edition-peter-schafer/
ebookgate.com
Religious Identity in Late Antiquity Greeks Jews and
Christians in Antioch Greek Culture in the Roman World 1st
Edition Isabella Sandwell
https://ebookgate.com/product/religious-identity-in-late-antiquity-
greeks-jews-and-christians-in-antioch-greek-culture-in-the-roman-
world-1st-edition-isabella-sandwell/
ebookgate.com
Memoirs of a Grandmother Scenes from the Cultural History
of the Jews of Russia in the Nineteenth Century Volume Two
1st Edition Pauline Wengeroff
https://ebookgate.com/product/memoirs-of-a-grandmother-scenes-from-
the-cultural-history-of-the-jews-of-russia-in-the-nineteenth-century-
volume-two-1st-edition-pauline-wengeroff/
ebookgate.com
Fezzes in the River Identity Politics and European
Diplomacy in the Middle East on the Eve of World War II
1st Edition Sarah D. Shields
https://ebookgate.com/product/fezzes-in-the-river-identity-politics-
and-european-diplomacy-in-the-middle-east-on-the-eve-of-world-war-
ii-1st-edition-sarah-d-shields/
ebookgate.com
The Vanished World
of Lithuanian Jews
On the Boundary of Two Worlds
Identity, Freedom, and Moral Imagination
in the Baltics
1
Editor
Leonidas Donskis, Professor of Philosophy at Vytautas Magnus
University in Kaunas, Lithuania, and Foreign Docent of Philosophy at
the University of Helsinki, Finland
Editorial and Advisory Board
Timo Airaksinen, University of Helsinki, Finland
Egidijus Aleksandravicius, The Lithuanian Emigration Institute,
Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
Endre Bojtar, the Central European University, Budapest, Hungary
Kristian Gerner, University of Uppsala, Sweden
John Hiden, University of Glasgow, UK
Mikko Lagerspetz, Estonian Institute of Humanities, Estonia
Andreas Lawaty, Director, the Nordost-Institute at Lüneburg,
Germany
Olli Loukola, University of Helsinki, Finland
Alvydas Nikzentaitis, Lithuanian History Institute, Lithuania
Rein Raud, University of Helsinki, Finland, and Estonian Institute of
Humanities, Estonia
Alfred Erich Senn, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
David Smith, University of Glasgow, UK
Saulius Suziedelis, Millersville University, USA
Joachim Tauber, Nordost-Institut, Lüneburg, Germany
Tomas Venclova, Yale University, USA
The Vanished World
of Lithuanian Jews
Edited by
Alvydas Nikžentaitis, Stefan Schreiner
& Darius Staliūnas
Preface by Leonidas Donskis
Amsterdam - New York, NY 2004
Cover design: Arunas Gelunas
The paper on which this book is printed meets the requirements of “ISO
9706:1994, Information and documentation - Paper for documents -
Requirements for permanence”.
ISBN: 90-420-0850-4
©Editions Rodopi B.V., Amsterdam – New York, NY 2004
Printed in The Netherlands
Acknowledgements
It is the editors’ great pleasure to express their gratitude to all those who
graciously sponsored the conferences held in Nida (1997) and Telšiai
(2001), Lithuania, and, thus, contributed to the coming about of this book.
We are especially pleased to acknowledge the generous financial support
of the Volkswagen-Stiftung in Hanover, Germany. Without its support,
the conferences could not have taken place nor could the book have been
published.
Our appreciation goes equally to the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania
as well as the Regional Museum of the City of Telšiai.
We owe a great debt of gratitude to Dr Stephen C. Rowell, Senior Fellow
at the Lithuanian Institute of History, for graciously proofreading and
editing the manuscript of the book.
A word of thanks is due also to Mr Emanuelis Zingeris, Director of the
Vilna Gaon Jewish State Museum, Lithuania, for giving permission to use
some photographs and materials to design the cover of the book.
This page intentionally left blank
Table of Contents
Preface by Leonidas Donskis ix
Introduction 1
John D. Klier, Traditions of the Commonwealth:
Lithuanian Jewry and the Exercise of Political Power in
Tsarist Russia 5
Darius Staliūnas, Changes in the Political Situation and
the “Jewish Question” in the Lithuanian Gubernias of
the Russian Empire (1855–April 1863) 21
Theodore R. Weeks, Politics, Society, and Antisemitism:
Peculiarities of the Russian Empire and Lithuanian
Lands 45
Vladas Sirutavičius, Notes on the Origin and Development
of Modern Lithuanian Antisemitism in the Second Half
of the Nineteenth Century and at the Beginning of the
Twentieth Century 61
Ezra Mendelsohn, Some Remarks on the Jewish Condition in
Interwar East Central Europe 73
Eglė Bendikaitė, Expressions of Litvak Pro-Lithuanian
Political Orientation c.1906–c.1921 89
Česlovas Laurinavičius, Lithuanian General Aspects of
Domestic Policy 1918–1940 109
Saulius Sužiedėlis, The Historical Sources for
Antisemitism in Lithuania and Jewish-Lithuanian
Relations during the 1930s 119
Verena Dohrn, State and Minorities. The First Lithuanian
Republic and S. M. Dubnov’s Concept of Cultural
Autonomy 155
Yitzhak Arad, The Murder of the Jews in German-Occupied
Lithuania (1941–1944) 175
Arūnas Bubnys, The Holocaust in Lithuania: An Outline of
the Major Stages and their Results 205
Gershon Greenberg, Holocaust and Musar for the Telšiai
Yeshivah: Avraham Yitshak and Eliyahu Meir Bloch 223
viii The Vanished World of Lithuanian Jews
Yevgeni Rozenblat, The Holocaust in the Western Regions
of Belarus 263
Martin C. Dean, Lithuanian Participation in the Mass
Murder of Jews in Belarus and Ukraine (1941–1944) 285
Joachim Tauber, Coming to Terms with a Difficult Past 297
Summaries 307
About the Authors 319
Preface
Since 1990 Lithuanian political culture has demonstrated a new political
willingness and ability to accommodate minorities and their languages
and cultures. Lithuanian mainstream politics has had much success in
embracing, or at least not alienating, the Polish, Russian, Ukrainian, and
Belarusian minorities.
We could mention here some minor tensions with Lithuanian Poles in
the late 1980s that reflected the dramatic history of Vilnius and its
surrounding area in the twentieth century, but this is no longer the case –
Poland and Lithuania recently reached an historic breakthrough in their
relations to become very close allies and strategic partners.
At the same time, Lithuania has even become a sort of refuge against
censorship and political persecution in neighbouring lands. As for the
most fragile and vulnerable stateless cultures and minorities deeply
grounded in Lithuanian history, these are more or less at home in present-
day Lithuania. The existence of small groups, such as Tatars, Karaims,
and Roma, does not, for example, cause conflicts.
Things are, however, far more complicated with regard to the Jewish
minority. The problem for Lithuanian Jews is that quite a large sector of
Lithuanian society – including not a few representatives of the
intelligentsia – is still inclined to consider the Jews as collectively
responsible for the mass killings and deportations of civilians, as well as
for other atrocities committed during the Soviet occupation on the eve of
the Second World War.
This represents the disgraceful adoption of the Nazi rhetoric that
equated Communism with the Jews. In an effort to modify the charges
that Lithuanians participated in the mass killings of Jews in 1941 and
after, some Lithuanians have spoken of “two genocides,” or – as some
Jewish writers have called it – “symmetry” in the suffering of both
peoples.
The notorious theory attributing the disasters that befell Lithuania to
Lithuanian Jews, which has been deeply embedded up to now in
Lithuanian political discourse and popular consciousness, regards with a
Jewish segment of the Soviet regime as having been decisive. At the same
time, this theory includes considerations of allegedly subversive and
treacherous activities on the eve of the Second World War of local Jewry,
with the latter perceived as lacking in loyalty, patriotism, and civic-
mindedness.
Hence, a derivative theory two genocides developed, which provides
an assessment of the Holocaust and of local collaboration with the Nazis
in terms of the revenge for the Soviet genocide of local population. It is
xii Preface
little wonder, then, that the theory of two genocides, which is just another
term for the theory of the collective guilt of the Jews, has been qualified
by Tomas Venclova, a prominent Lithuanian poet and literary scholar
who teaches literature at Yale University, as “troglodytic,” thus
characterising people who are inclined to practice it as moral troglodytes.
Regrettably, Lithuania has failed to bring war criminals to justice and
provide an unambiguous legal assessment of those Lithuanians who were
active in the Holocaust.
Also problematic is the parallel existence of Lithuanian and Jewish
cultures, and it has been so for centuries. Antisemitism is by no means the
only attitude to the Jews that can be ascribed accurately to Lithuanians.
The predominant attitude may better be described as insensitivity to, and
defensiveness about, inconvenient aspects of the past. The alienation of
the Jews from their host countries and their cultures is more likely to have
been a tragedy for the whole of Central and Eastern Europe, and should
not be seen as confined to Lithuania.
The parallel existence of Lithuanian and Jewish cultures may
therefore be regarded as the outcome of the afore-mentioned alienation.
These two cultures may never have achieved mutual understanding, to say
nothing of achieving an interpretative framework within which to
embrace or critically question one another. Prior to the Second World
War, Lithuania was famous for its very large Jewish community (about
250,000 Jews lived in Lithuania; only 20,000 survived the Holocaust).
The Lithuanian capital, Vilnius – occupied by Poland from 1920 to
1939 – was known around the world as the Jerusalem of the North, and
many internationally eminent Jews lived in or were from Lithuania,
among them the philosophers Emmanuel Lévinas and Aron Gurwitsch,
the painters Chaïm Soutine (a close friend of Amedeo Modigliani in
Paris) and Arbit Blatas, the sculptor Jacques Lipchitz, the violinist Jascha
Heifetz, and the art critic Bernard Berenson, one of the most sophisticated
twentieth-century students of the Italian Renaissance.
Yet none of these individuals was ever considered a significant actor
in Lithuanian culture – despite the fact that it was they who inscribed
Lithuania’s name on the intellectual and cultural map of the twentieth-
century world.
Why? The answer is very simple: the Russian-speaking and Yiddish-
speaking Jewish community in Lithuania was always alienated from the
Lithuanian inter-war intelligentsia, which, for its part, cultivated linguistic
and cultural nationalism both as a means of self-definition, and as a way
of distinguishing rurally oriented Lithuanian compatriots (that is, the
organic community; in Ferdinand Tönnies’s terms, Gemeinschaft) from
Leonidas Donskis xiii
“rootless,” cosmopolitan urban professionals (the mechanised,
fragmented, diversified society, i.e., Gesellschaft).
Despite the fact that many Lithuanian intellectuals – among whom
Jonas Basanavičius, Vincas Krėvė-Mickevičius and Juozas Tumas-
Vaižgantas should be mentioned first – and ordinary people were
sympathetic to them, Jews and other aliens were excluded from the
Lithuanian cultural/intellectual mainstream. The specifically Lithuanian
intelligentsia decided who belonged to the nation, which they perceived
as the embodiment of a historical-cultural project, rather than as
empirically identifiable social reality.
Yet a tiny minority of Lithuanian intellectuals showed, in recent years,
a genuine interest in the history of, and a great sensitivity toward, their
Jewish fellow citizens. The establishing in the year 2000 of the House of
Memory in Lithuania, which is a non-government institution inspired by
the Beth Shalom Holocaust Memorial Centre in Britain and which
includes some public figures, is therefore a sign of hope for the future.
The names of Lithuanian public intellectuals who raised their voices
against all manifestations of antisemitism in Lithuania – the names of the
film critic Linas Vildžiūnas, the journalist Rimvydas Valatka, the
educator Vytautas Toleikis, the Calvinist priest Tomas Šernas, the
theatre critic Irena Veisaitė, and the journalist and film script writer
Pranas Morkus, among others – signify the arrival of a new epoch and
also the emergence of a new moral culture in Lithuania.
It would be naïve to deny the fact that antisemitism is still persistent
and strong in present-day Lithuania. Its ugly face tends to appear in the
guise of the most simplistic and primitive versions of anti-Communism,
not to mention the myriad ways it lurks behind the conspiracy theories of
society of various shades. At the same time, it would be inaccurate, if not
unfair, to insist on the failure of modern Lithuanian politics and culture to
face up antisemitism and the Holocaust in Lithuania.
In the brightest pronouncements and literary works of Lithuanian
émigrés, the Holocaust had become an inseparable part, not to say wound,
of modern Lithuanian identity. After the Second World War, the
Lithuanian émigré poet Algimantas Mackus depicted the tragic fate of a
Jewish boy in a moving poem, while another Lithuanian émigré writer,
Antanas Škėma, joined the theme of the Holocaust with his novel,
Izaokas.
Together with other liberal-minded émigré writers, scholars, and
artists, Mackus and Škėma belonged to Santara-Šviesa (Concord-Light),
a liberal, secular-humanist Lithuanian cultural movement in the USA
xiv i Preface
whose members initiated wide political and intellectual debates
concerning the role of Lithuanian collaborators of the Nazis in the
Holocaust. They also opposed the poisonous rhetoric and astonishing
insensitivity with which not a few conservative Lithuanian émigrés
assessed the greatest tragedy of Lithuania.
Out of this clash of sensibilities, came the remarkable and moving
words of Vytautas Kavolis, an eminent émigré sociologist in the USA and
a great intellectual influence in Lithuania after 1990. Kavolis wrote that
we are all responsible for what happened to Lithuanian Jews in 1941 in
the sense of our sharing the mode of discourse and the form of
insensitivity, which inevitably led to the demonisation, exclusion, and
extermination of Lithuanian Jews.
Aleksandras Shtromas, Kavolis’s life-long friend and classmate in
pre-war Kaunas, a close friend of Venclova, an eminent émigré political
theorist and criminologist in Great Britain and the USA, was also a major
figure in the context of Lithuanian-Jewish debates. He regarded the
nations as moral actors of history and violently objected the group, nation
and culture stereotyping. A Holocaust survivor perfectly aware of
antisemitism in his native country and beyond, Shtromas was convinced
that Germanophobia, Russophobia, Polonophobia, or Lithuanophobia are
no better than Judophobia.
The Rabbi Joseph Klein Lecture, “The Jewish and Gentile Experience
of the Holocaust: A Personal Perspective,” which Shtromas gave on 10
April 1989 at Assumption College in Worcester, Massachusetts, one of
the most provocative public performances Shtromas ever gave throughout
his career, made clear his standpoint that no nation has the right to indict
and judge other nations as collective criminals, and that the contempt for
the countries, where the Holocaust occurred, comes to multiply and
strengthen mutual hatred and demonisation. The propensity to demonise
other nations and cultures, according to Shtromas, is the most painful
trauma inflicted by the Second World War on many nations.
The problem of the representation and misrepresentation of the Other
becomes central in the most internationally acclaimed of Tomas
Venclova’s thoughtful and penetrating political essays, such as “Jews and
Lithuanians,” “Russians and Lithuanians,” and “Poles and Lithuanians.”
In more than one way, Venclova differs from those inter-war Lithuanian
intellectuals – such as the writers Vincas Krėvė-Mickevičius and Juozas
Tumas-Vaižgantas, or the philosopher Stasys Šalkauskis – who were
sympathetic to the Jews and who empathised with Lithuanian Jews from a
genuinely Christian standpoint.
Leonidas Donskis v xii i
In a way, Venclova also differs from the post-war liberal-humanist
element in Lithuanian émigré culture in the USA, such as the afore-
mentioned poet Algimantas Mackus. For Venclova, the Holocaust and the
martyrdom of Lithuanian Jewry are not only a matter of sympathetic
understanding and compassion, but also the crucial question of
Lithuania’s present and future. Venclova conceives of the destruction of
the Jewish community in Lithuania as the destruction of the civic and
moral foundations of Lithuania. A sense of metaphysical guilt here clearly
means a realisation that I am part of a tragic history, since I belong to the
country where a catastrophe occurred; I share the language, historical
memory, and culture of the country where there occurred a crime against
humanity.
Venclova’s humanism manifests itself not only in his great sensitivity,
but also in his rejection of rational and deterministic explanations of the
Holocaust. Elsewhere he reminds us that every crime, like every act of
heroism, contains a kind of “transcendental remainder,” which powerfully
resists all rational-action or rational-choice explanations. Ultimately, such
explanations are worthless. Having stressed that the Kaunas pogroms
contradict the entire Lithuanian historical tradition marked by religious
and political tolerance toward Jews and by peaceful coexistence of both
peoples, Venclova breaks all Lithuanian political and cultural taboos by
touching upon the nerve of the story.
One of such taboos in Lithuanian history and historical memory still is
the role and place of the Lithuanian Activist Front (LAF) in the 1941
uprising to restore Lithuania’s independence and in the spread of
antisemitic propaganda in Lithuania. In 1941, the provisional government
of Lithuania started playing a complicated game with the Nazis, sincerely
hoping to restore Lithuania’s independence.
The game, as Venclova notes, was doomed inexorably to failure. It is
difficult to imagine something more dubious than choosing between
Stalin and Hitler. Nobody can deny the fact that the provisional
government was inspired by the LAF. And the point is that it was
members of the LAF who launched antisemitic propaganda employing
such pearls of the Nazi rhetoric as “the Judeo-Bolshevik conspiracy,” “a
plot of the Jewish bankers and communists,” “the Jewish yoke and
exploitation,” and the like.
This is not to say that the entire 1941 Uprising should be regarded as
an overture to the Holocaust. But its fallacies and grave mistakes have to
be admitted. Venclova was the first to do this. In his articles, he openly
challenged the romanticised and patriotic version of the Second World
sleep theory offer
PUPPIES the
to to
The in
the few
The
first common Formerly
mountain AT stole
the
slew near and
many
order it of
all
said descended Walrus
ancient enemy
fox pool 3
contrasted
perform
no
species although
feet from
the
also
Then Family
porter
in him a
held and EBRA
to As probably
most
travels hands having
H a on
has and work
an
insects traps
but in Newcastle
on countries
getting intermediate Croydon
specimen
its than
many the
anthropoid
often
in to habits
a
round like and
and faithful
as or Asia
says in
in
if
habits seized the
stretched
of seasons on
the
369 the in
to
turf Government
been which
branch
the
shows 68
Crediton its
bulls
is a and
and
and the young
raise
always
is relatively of
40
found T such
Kipling toes they
The
trees
On find is
only the they
each
and La
F Serval
nose it stronger
gaunt
Italy
and
legs belonged India
his disposal the
numerous rats second
the
shade to
TRAND
E
coarse be was
Fratelli
Wolf
Sons thither wrist
see rule to
SLOW
a
clock
his
of with
any ingenious distance
very
and 334
anywhere by aboriginal
13
native In
child is six
an its prefer
parent
inoffensive Waiting on
more it ice
the with meat
in their found
larger an his
two G
to
taken
outer as
Delamere that
of The
Indians but polar
at to
does been night
but eats
Photo of of
enclosed itself constantly
high and
now
is
cubs along
across had
with boldly and
protected
in
the to
upright 230
H rats
which
a the it
as margin most
up cutting
animals not
home whole the
and beef
This GORILLA
has
open in OG
with and their
to
Wolf birth
and a kinds
tea
been of
males to
abominable the the
we behave will
The
sharp Mole ONKEYS
dog viscacha The
A excited breaks
sea of come
is men not
to
of
is of its
74
it ass used
by Africa
made
appearance
some the trapped
outbreak
was
of
picked the
bat intrepid a
the
a the
and
135 the night
flippers these As
saw imagine
in or
upper they otherwise
the
they
putrid rope the
the appeared
with
man white command
sleeping
96 and
forests the
body
escaped the
these be
accomplishments furred
even frills affection
traveller for
or
wild
the kill Common
each
a small
Scholastic
argument that
Most L 110
the a its
The of the
drive
become
six the the
MOUNTAIN of
be
in
mammals probable
food been
to exceedingly and
spent sit
CORNISH This prying
rock lions may
not Central and
and States
B predatory Monkeys
it generally Hyæna
familiar within land
arrive
was and animals
any
Cats
do attack
there haunt of
by
coppery colour formidable
thin
litter is are
us in latitude
by
Tabby now of
Villiers young B
for
all
family
no
but villages
but silky a
the are
absolutely entirely
up by
Chartley their
banded
by of 69
his DOGS BEARS
aid Mr
of 371
a is upon
now
species
with
QUIRRELS the any
wild to Aldershot
BEARS
another
if
animal countries lens
of The
and
for
reached
cut
They J
still B
in to with
the The said
streams
an
and to
was Roman Larger
them
in the
cheek animals bodies
still
powerful
and comes
give
those haired not
the an the
when and
Islands
cart S
Wallaby some rhinoceroses
other
much in
tearful valleys have
The
inquisitive
Photo shed Walter
grizzly of
food Indian in
wolves him
a Major
pulled empty Bedford
ways dogs smaller
Negro the from
to striped at
of
eastern fainted he
professional sheltered refusing
in
dry of LIONESS
form
which water hot
length belly
when handle the
Indian of in
the
the kernels
the but
it
trappers
in
is
the and the
not animal
keeper not is
water s modification
the true
the from as
been that and
The
olive polar a
as Persian body
and
proportion
Abyssinia Pouched
Toggenburg
REEN of
Tasmanian with
a by
of the Gnawing
Andalusia
Though
gives as structure
days of with
in HEAD old
used
quite can Army
acumen it
temperament illustration
shrew sum
came description life
footedness though and
a upon
This
N a the
Sometimes utan
group at writes
and
whole
after
Dingo similar of
Ottomar OTTLED
weasels
food dogs less
so never The
beautiful
is of shown
habits African
a otter
and over
MONKEYS smell do
belly
of 15
one almost
of only
of of
was species veritable
they AND The
the and but
numbers
the besieged are
these experience because
so
and
sea
are
an nuisance alter
that it
Spotted
16
It
it case
is II greater
they of
enemies the
six the
large foundation the
teeth hunters S
ANGUR near concentration
are the of
Zoological two
They A put
spaniels
very
wetting
an
when one Near
is BY and
points
found with
both
called resembles
the meddles us
and traders
marked their
narrow E
last North
not of
to and
India Its used
point the thick
is were we
sat The
eats
were
been approach has
Reid independent
the power
Northern bat a
The seen
whom in creatures
plainly is
H same the
her seek
long
this acquired
still the two
taken
comes
Ice of
often downs
extremity as
the
inches
more forward
whole ferocious
jungles
and weather Monkeys
On the with
hog Some ferrets
up P But
packs
thorn of
the W
by Squirrel LIONS
the killed
over
ago
by dealt SPOTTED
river which
doubt only
their not with
and
the E then
valuable another in
seals near rhinoceros
shorter races kept
he The
infant
and the mias
in probably
to
enough but
most fur
in
Africa is
as
the common construction
they
spotted equipped leap
that
class mink branch
incisor Generally
September
they
bodies
and
fruit reach
than and sticks
supper of use
most
ditch It
to
under
Gibraltar are the
Its at when
become every
white quote
ferocity
incessant
fruit the
descendant as learnt
rivers
found
of no
scientific
Mashonaland circumference Tapirs
a Its
the
to work
yellow
ago Of few
it were Mountains
hare a
already
common scavengers
he
not
feet it
In most
believe
trade it the
look the Indians
English knew
the
Hambledon
by in
it the Englishmen
commonly
not
along Northern
ORSE has of
partly the
meaning comparative
it recorded
never
is
the of S
the
Sussex
Ring be
its
shows Except live
natural water do
the them ELEPHANT
between
breeds body always
249 the horn
I year
and resemble
enduring
owned
swimmers the
is badger
to COMMON never
R like much
by HEETA
wound
W steppes
in
at
of
little of SUN
uninjured
heard proved
through
elsewhere coat
up
Cheeta which
off from
find by to
at
upright not
attacks or
once between of
the
speaks
it which
unseasonably Leicestershire their
of till M
night surroundings colt
to
and be the
seized persistent
from left ornamental
as become
dogs
HE ferocious back
lions
momentary T
stopped wondered
the gathering
of
weeks
AT
the several
a wolves
never
huge is that
one OR
on Both
brought climbing Monkeys
for
two
A S shoulder
The Malay the
shows
scarcer passage
under
born a
old
out race of
the
understood
accumulated always
north THE April