Samruddhi Mahamarg Guidelines and STD Formats by MSRDC
Samruddhi Mahamarg Guidelines and STD Formats by MSRDC
2. References
This document has drawn reference from the following clause and schedules of the EPC contract agreement:
1. Article 19: Payment
2. Schedule O: Format for Stage payments
3. Schedule H: Details of Stage payment items
4. Limitations
This is just a guideline issued in project interest for consistent quality throughout the entire stretch. Contractor reserves the rights vested as per
the contract terms & conditions. The above guidelines shall not be treated as any addendum or variation to the original contract.
Guidelines for Contractor’s Payment
Form No.
Form Name: Log for Payment Statement & issuance of IPC
Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway
Contract Package Appointment Date Signature
Contractor Name
Number
AE Name Invoice Date
Name of Team Leader, AE
Base Value of the Days lapsed till this
Invoice Number
contract, INR invoice
0
Price
Invoice under Adjusted
IPC value certified Amount Paid against adjustment Amount
Sno. Invoice No. Invoice date Invoice Value INR IPC Issued Yes/ No IPC issue date dispute Additional Remark
INR IPC / Invoice applied to Withheld
Yes/No Amount INR
this IPC
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
₹
1 Sub Total 100.000%
-
Form Name:
CONTRACT VALUE Invoice Number Base Index Month: Name & Designation, Contractor
Labour Cement Steel Bitumen Fuel & Lubricants Other Materials Plant, Machinery & Spares
ITEM as Table of
Percentage Price Price Price Price Price Price Price TOTAL
ITEM Stage for Payment applicable UO P
Governing Price RW/BW PL LO LI Adjust PC CO CI Adjust SO SI Adjust PB BO BI Adjust PF FO FI Adjust PM MO MI Adjust PA AO AI Adjust VRW/BR
NO as per contract M S
Adjustment as per Value Value Value Value Value Value Value W
Clause 19.10.4 (e)
C. C. C. C. C.
B. B. C. B. C. B. B. B. B.
[%] [%] Inde [INR] [%] [INR] [%] [INR] [%] Inde [INR] [%] Inde [INR] [%] Inde [INR] [%] Inde [INR] [INR]
Index Index Index Index Index Index Index Index Index
x x x x x
1.A A- Deleted
₹ ₹ 0 ₹
1.B.01.06 (6) Bituminous Base Course Bituminous Work 20% 0% ₹ - ₹ - 15% ₹ - 10% ₹ - 40% ₹ - 15% ₹ -
- - % -
₹ ₹ 0 ₹
1.B.01.07 (5) Wearing Coat Bituminous Work 20% 0% ₹ - ₹ - 15% ₹ - 10% ₹ - 40% ₹ - 15% ₹ -
- - % -
1 Sub Total
6.6. Log for Royalty Qty & Payment (to be maintained by AE)
Form No.
Form Name: Log for Royalty Payment
Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway
Portion of
Description of Material Grade/ layer Aggregate/Material Composition
IPC Description of Work as per Qty. as wt. per cum as per Rate of Quantity Qty from Rate of applicable Amount of
(M15/M30/M35/ GSB/DLC/PQC/ Unit (stonedust/ 20mm/ Density in MT/Cum
Month Schedule H per IPC Mix design (MT) Constant (Cum) Borrow Royalty Royalty
Subgrade/Embankment) 10mm/ 6mm/sand etc)
area (%)
a b c d e f g h i= h/g j = i*e k l m
Earthwork, Granular and other
Work
Bitumen Work
1 Cement Pavement
Culverts, MNB, & other
Structures
Major Bridges and Structures
Earthwork, Granular and other
Work
Bitumen Work
2 Cement Pavement
Culverts, MNB, & other
Structures
Major Bridges and Structures
Form No.
Form Name: Penalty for delays during construction
Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway
Contract Package Appointment Date Signature
Contractor Name
Number
AE Name Invoice Date
Base Value of the Days lapsed till this Name of Team Leader, AE
Invoice Number
contract, INR invoice 0
Final price
Scheduled Milestone Milestone
adjusted
completion date Penalty Value value after
value
INR price
Milestone including extention Actual date of deducting
adjustment
Milestone no. Milestone Base Value INR completion days granted Milestone completion Time lapsed (days) Penalty percentage penalty Remark
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
6.9. Log for change of scope payment (To be filled and maintained by AE)
Form No.
Form Name: Log for change of scope payment
Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway
Appointment
Contractor Name Contract Package Number
Date Signature
AE Name Invoice Date
Base Value of the Days lapsed Name of Team Leader,
Invoice Number
contract, INR till this invoice 0 AE
2. References
Guidelines has drawn reference from the GC Clause 6 and SC Clause 6 of AE Contract Agreement
3. Identification of Steps
3.1. Authority Approval Process for Monthly Payment
a) The AE shall prepare a statement of payment along with the supporting documents not limited to itemized statement, copies of receipt, as per
GC clause 6.3 & 6.4.
b) The AE shall submit 6 (six) hard copies to Authority and copy of the submission shall be shared via email with Authority & PSO. Along with
applicable formats and checklist attached in guidelines
c) The AE shall submit a Formal Payment statement to the Authority within the 15th day of each calendar month.
d) The date of receipt by the Authority shall be considered as the date of submission or base date from which the payment due date shall be
calculated.
e) The statement would then be reviewed by Authority for compliance and thereafter certified, indicating the amount payable after accounting
for all dues from previous certified payment(s) indicating reasons for such adjustments.
f) The Full Payment, as certified by Authority, shall be made within 60 days of receipt of such statement, failing which interest shall be applicable
on the amount due to AE at a rate as specified in the Special Conditions or as applicable during the time of payment. If there is any discrepancy
between actual and authorized cost to be incurred by the AE, then difference shall be adjusted from any subsequent payments.
4. Limitations
1. Payments are limited to GC clause 6.1 except for modification as agreed under GC clause 2.6 and not exceeding ceiling specified in the SC.
2. Any additional expenditure not envisaged under GC clause 6.1 (a), shall be paid accordance to GC 6.1(b).
3. Consultant shall be paid on man-month basis for deployment of Key personnel, Sub-professional personnel and Support Staff considering 6
days a week as work week.
4. Consultant shall also be paid for other items as stated in their financial proposal. The payments shall be based on overall financial progress of
the Contractor expressed as percentage of civil works cost of the contractor.
5. Remuneration for payment claimed for durations spanning less than one month shall be calculated on an hourly basis where (Clause 6.2(b)(i)
(2))
a) One-hour Time spent in home office (AE head office) is equivalent to 1/240th of a month
b) On calendar basis one day spent away from home office is equivalent to 1/30th of the month.
6. The financial progress of Contractor shall be calculated as ratio of cumulative contractor payments certified (excluding escalation & tax) to
contract price of the contractor, expressed as percentage. Any change to the contract price due to change in scope, or otherwise shall be used
for calculating such financial progress.
7. Public holidays announced by the Govt. of Maharashtra shall be applicable to AE.
8. Public holiday shall not be accounted for man month deployment calculation by AE, if any of the key personnel is on a consecutive leave,
including one day prior & after such public holidays.
9. Claimed amount for the personnel shall be based on his effective man-hours utilization for the month and Man-hours of any key personnel shall
not be carried forward to subsequent month for claim.
10. This is just a guideline issued in project interest for consistent quality throughout the entire stretch. Contractor reserves the rights vested as
per the contract terms & conditions. The above guidelines shall not be treated as any addendum or variation to the original contract.
Notes:-
Notes:-
7
Survey Equipment with Survey Party and Vehicle
8 Contingencies* (as per Authrity Approval)
9
10
3. Identification of Steps
If not identified at
3.1. Process for Utility Shifting DPR stage, AE to
inform of
a. EPC Contractor shall identify all utilities in NO probable cost
Is Utility obstructing
overrun to
RoW which may obstruct execution of Project ROW ?
Authority
works during the construction and
maintenance of NMSCEW and upon YES
identifying any such utility, shall notify the
Authority and AE within 1 working day. 1 Day AE to verify and notify 1 Day
EPC Contractor to notify Authority, UOA & AE to conduct
Authority, if utility was
b. Upon being notified by the EPC contractor, the Authority & AE
identified at DPR stage
joint site survey
AE shall verify the stage at which the
utility had been identified (DPR/ Others) 7 Days
c. Authority shall notify UOA for holding joint
inspection regarding the identified utility AE to scrutinize drawings
5 Days UOA to prepare drawings &
estimates, along with demand
and its proposed shifting plan. note and submit to AE for
& verify estimates
d. Authority, AE, EPC Contractor and UOA comments
3 Days
within 7 working day shall carry out joint
site visit. Subsequently, UOA within 5
working days shall prepare detailed design
3 Days
& drawings, estimates, BOQ and demand EPC contractor to Authority to review & approve
execute the work estimates
note, Further, UOA shall submit the same
with AE & Authority for his comments and
(Based on Work
observations. Program)
e. AE , within 3 working days, shall scrutinize
3 Days UOA to certify the RA bills and
the detailed drawings, estimates and BOQ EPC contractor to raise
measurement book. Issue work
& submit to Authority with his RA bills
completion certificate
recommendations.
f. Upon receiving AE’s comments & 7 Days
4. Limitations
This is just a guideline issued in project interest for consistent quality throughout the entire stretch. Contractor reserves the rights vested as per
the contract terms & conditions. The above guidelines shall not be treated as any addendum or variation to the original contract.
Guidelines for Utility Shifting
Availablility
Sr. No. Description Remarks
√ /X
Confirm that the cost Estimate for
1 utility shifting approved by UOA
Confirm the estimate with detailed
2 drawings & BOQ / Demand Note
approved by Authority
3 Work Program for utility shifting
4 Measurement book signed by
a Utility Owning Authority
b Authority's Engineer
5 RA bill certified by
a Utility Owning Authority
b Authority's Engineer
6 Proof of Payments (attached)
Work executed by EPC Contractor
6.1
himself
a Undertaking for the Work executed
Work executed by EPC Contractor's Sub
6.2
Contractor
a Sub Contractors invoice
Sub Contractors payment proof for
b
utility shifting works
c Vendors invoice
Sub Contractors payment proof for
d
utility shifting works
RA Bill & Measurement Book both
7 signed by Project Director (NMSCEL) at
regional level.
8 RA Bill approved at Head office
Guidelines for Utility Shifting
Project Title:
Contractor Name &
Package:
Utility type:
Utility Owner & Address:
Utility Description:
Affected Chainage and
activity:
Contractor Letter No: Date:
Checklist to be filled by AE
Sl. no. Description Yes No
Q1 Was Utility Identified by contractor during initial utility survey?
Q2 Does the Utility shifting proposal matches:
a) budget provision within DPR
b) If No, attach a sheet for explaining the change
Does Utility crosses the proposed expressway? If yes can it be routed through the nearest
Q3
proposed utility duct?
a) If yes can it be routed through the nearest proposed utility duct?
b) If answer to Q3(a) is No, Please specify type of structure required along with the drawing?
a) Does the proposed technical specifications for the involved utility matches with that of
Q4
existing similar utility ?
b) If No, attach a sheet explaining reason for upgradation and additional cost for the
upgradation.
Q6 Does the proposal account for effective operation & maintenance requirement for utility?
Is subcontractor to be engaged for works empaneled with utility owner? If no please include
Q7
credentials of subcontractor, who shall take up the concerned works?
Q8 Please provide any other relevant information required for review of document?
Attachments required:
Utility Owner approval of estimate Timeline for works to be taken
Work Method Statement Relevant procedure for utility service downtime
Drawing on proposed PPD Any other (please specify)
Site photograph
Notes:-
From To
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2. References
Guidelines has drawn reference from the Article 13 “Change of Scope” of EPC Contract Volume II
a) For changes initiated by Authority, justification of such changes may need not be established. Hence, the Change Order Request may be
prepared/ responded based on consultation with all stakeholders.
b) For changes initiated by the Contractor, the justification of such change needs to be established with the Authority by Authority’s Engineer.
c) On acceptance of such change by Authority, a detailed Change Order Request shall be prepared and submitted to the Authority by the
Contractor along with supporting documents, detailed working of quantities and rates. The applicable formats are provided in this document.
d) Prior to submission, proposal supporting document may be verified by Proof/ Safety consultant or any external consultant for technical
reliability of proposal.
e) AE shall negotiate with contractor on the submitted Change Order Requests, if necessary, along with the Authority to justify price, scope, time
& specification.
f) AE upon in-principle acceptance by Authority shall communicate the same to contractor within 15days.
g) AE shall lead joint review with concerned stakeholders (upstream & downstream) to form a detailed/ optimized proposal with modified/
negotiated terms.
h) AE shall prepare revised program incorporating time implications in coordination with all stakeholder involved/ identified. The same will be
submitted to Authority for review, along with negotiated/ certified cost of change and supporting documents.
i) Authority shall review complete Proposal with respect to contract compliance & restrictions and shall communicate acceptance of the same
with change, if any.
j) AE shall thereafter issue notice & acceptance for change of scope to contractor to proceed with same. And within 5 working days, the contractor
shall communicate his acceptance, failing which the change shall be deemed accepted.
k) Contractor/ AE shall maintain a record of the status of various Change Order Claims to Authority. The applicable formats are provided at section
6.1 of this document.
l) Contracts Team of Contractor along with AE shall ensure the Amendment of Project Contract / Agreement to the extent of certified value of
the approved Change Order Request.
4. Limitations
This is just a guideline issued in project interest for consistent quality throughout the entire stretch. Contractor reserves the rights vested as per
the contract terms & conditions. The above guidelines shall not be treated as any addendum or variation to the original contract.
Project Support Office (PSO)- NMSCEW Page 1 of 3
Guidelines for Change of Scope
Sl. No. Change Order Request No. Change Order Request Title Brief Description Tenable? (Y/N) Approved by Client? (Y/N) Certified Value (INR Cr.) Invoice No. Payment Status Remarks
1
2
3
4
5
INITIAL ANALYSIS
Hour Impact
Duration Impact
Schedule Impact
Comments
Recommendations
2. References
Guidelines has drawn reference from the Article 3 & Clause 3.2 (Obligations of the Contractor), EPC Agreement Vol. II
3. Identification of steps
3.1. Authority Review & Approval Process for Sub-Contracting
a) The Contractor shall submit sub-contractor list AE for record. In case for sub-contractor award value exceeds 5% of Contract price the proposal
should be sent to AE with copy to Authority for evaluation and approval of Sub-Contractor.
b) The Contractor shall submit 3 hard copies of his proposal for engagement of a sub-contractor along with all the relevant supporting documents
to the Authority Engineer (AE) at least 15 working days prior to the execution of Sub-contract.
c) The AE shall forward to the Authority, a detailed proposal seeking clearance of such sub-contractors wrt to National security and public interest
for all sub-contractor with award values exceeds 5% of contract price and for all other sub-contractors AE may forward these for clearance as
deemed necessary.
d) AE in consultation with Authority communicate his decision within 15 working days from the date of communication, if a. Sub-Contractor is
Admissible his proposal shall be further taken up for evaluation as per clause 3.2 of EPC Contract Agreement.
e) AE shall further scrutinize the proposal, identifying the following details:
i. Value of similar Works executed in previous 3 years.
ii. Award value of Similar works and
iii. Payment realized on all such similar works.
f) Based on Scrutiny, AE shall provide his comments/recommendation on the proposal within 20 days from submission date.
g) AE to forward his recommendation to Authority in the form of a hard copy and a soft copy for review and approval of award of works to sub-
contractor within 45 days of communication form contractor. And communicate in writing, the final decision of the Authority to the contractor.
4. Limitations
This is just a guideline issued in project interest for consistent quality throughout the entire stretch. Contractor reserves the rights vested as per
the contract terms & conditions. The above guidelines shall not be treated as any addendum or variation to the original contract
Form No.
Form Name: Log for Sub Contractor
Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway
Contract Package Appointment Date Signature
Contractor Name
Number
AE Name Log Update Date
Name of Team Leader, AE
Base Value of the Current Sub- Sum Value of Sub
contract, INR Contractor Number Contract works
0
2. References
Document has drawn reference from “MORT&H specifications”, “IRC:SP:99 –2013” and Schedule D of Volume II of the Agreement.
4. Limitations
In case EPC contractor intends to use any alternative material whether patented or not, which is not specifically covered in Indian or International
Standards, but the use of which has been permitted on similar project then the Contractor shall submit a certificate supported by details of critical
performance. This certificate shall be signed by the owners of such similar projects regarding the continuous successful performance of such
materials for last 5 years of service life.
This is just a guideline issued in project interest for consistent quality throughout the entire stretch. Contractor reserves the rights vested as per
the contract terms & conditions. The above guidelines shall not be treated as any addendum or variation to the original contract.
Vendor:-_________________________________________________________________________________
Address:-________________________________________________________________________________
City:-_______________________________________State:-_______________________________________
Material Details
Material:-________________________________________________________________________________
Specification:-_____________________________________________________________________________
Vendor Evaluation
1= Very Poor, 2= Poor, 3 = Satisfactory, 4 = Good , 5 = Very Good
Vendors Evaluation 1 2 3 4 5
Past Experience of Vendor
Size of Client Base
Competitiveness of Price
Overall Financial Condition
Financial Capacity
Quality of material as per specification
Technical Support of Staff
Serviceability of the material
Results of Test Conducted
Total
Grand Total
Name:- Signature:-
Checked by Authority -
Name:- Signature:-
2. Identification of steps
2.1. Approval Process for New Meeting request
a) The concerned stakeholder to prepare a
statement along with the supporting documents.
And submit same to Authority representative
(AE).
b) PSO shall review the statement based on
i. From whom submission is made (Primary or
secondary stakeholder)
ii. The objective of meeting & if same is
overlapping with existing meeting.
iii. And if it’s one time or re-occurring meeting
request
iv. Availability of concerned stakeholder
c) PSO shall review meeting logs and propose non-
conflicting meeting timing.
d) For any Urgent meeting with Authority decision
shall prevail and other meeting shall stand
cancelled to conduct meeting at earliest. Same
to be formalized and recorded for action by PSO.
e) For other meetings the PSO shall classify and
label them with respect to Priority Matrix shown
in section 4.4
f) Based on review & suggestion PSO, Authority
shall provide its final decision on meeting request, which
would them be recorded in log and taken up for meeting
setup and closure.
2.2. Process of setting up & closure of Meeting
g) Create a schedule of meetings at least one month in advance
at a frequency specified by the Organization al Official.
h) Post the schedule over email as meeting request and as
internal office memo.
i) Notify the concerned individuals of the updated schedule, via
LETTER OF INVITATION: inviting relevant stakeholders to a
meeting which would indicate the following information:
i. The purpose of the letter
ii. The Responsible person to attend the meeting
iii. Date and Time
iv. Venue
v. Agenda for the meeting
vi. However, letters of invitation are channeled through
emails, personal delivery, and by postage.
j) FEEDBACK FROM STAKEHOLDERS: NMSCEL accepts
feedback from stakeholders after letters have been
distributed on the convenience of the proposed date and
time for the meeting.
k) FOLLOW UP: This is done through telephone calls to remind
the stakeholders for an effective meeting to be carried out.
l) MEETING DAYS AND IMPLEMENT: Meetings are held and timelines are set to implement agreed discussions.
m) ACTION REQUIRED: Two days prior to meeting all relevant documents & data shall be shared with PSO by concerned stakeholders. And
Meeting minutes are recorded and action required to be communicated to all concerned stakeholder by the Organizer. If any discrepancy in
minutes of meeting, it shall be communicated to Organizer within five working days or same shall be binding to all.
n) Review of meeting outcome shall be done as per meeting review flow chart.
2. References
Document has drawn reference from GC Article 26 of
EPC Contract Agreement Volume II
Not Applicable
2. References
Guidelines has drawn reference from following clause(s) of the EPC contract agreement:
1. GC Clause 11.8 of EPC Contract Agreement Volume II
2. GC Clause 11.11 of EPC Contract Agreement Volume II
Subject:
Description of Activity
Tick Contractor Tick
Sno. Description AE sign
yes No sign yes No
Attachments:
Date:
Project Incharge
Date:
Chainage STATUS
2. References
Guidelines has drawn reference from Article 11 “Quality Assurance,
Monitoring and Supervision” of EPC Contract Volume II
3. Identification of steps
3.1 Authority Review Process for Quality
Assurance and Control
a) The Contractor shall prepare and submit copy of Quality
Assurance Plan (QAP) along with necessary particulars, shall be
submitted to the Authority representative (AE) within 30 days of
Appointed Date.
b) AE shall review the QAP within 21 days of receipt in consultation
with Authority and PSO
c) AE shall complete his review of QAP in 5 working day and share
his observation with Authority & PSO for review.
d) If need of meeting is justified, the Authority to set up meeting
with Contractor for observation and action plan to Implement
QAP in-line with Contract Agreement.
e) PSO to Support Authority (PD/CE) for review of QAP within 10
days and share their observation with AE.
f) AE to incorporate Authority review of QAP and Approve with
comments the submission to EPC Contractor.
g) Contractor to incorporate AE observation and re-submit revised
QAP for record & implementation to AE and Authority.
3.2 Review Process for Quality Control & Work
Methodology
a) The Contractor shall have Quality control mechanism including sampling
and testing of Materials, test frequencies, standards, acceptance criteria,
testing facilities, reporting, recording and interpretation of test results,
approvals, check list for site activities, and proforma for testing and
calibration in accordance with the Specifications for Road and Bridge Works
issued by MORTH, relevant IRC specifications, NHAI’s Quality Assurance
Manual, 2006 and Good Industry Practice; and Internal quality audit system
b) The Contractor shall prepare and submit copy of Quality control& work
Methodology Plan along with necessary particulars and to be submitted to
the Authority representative (AE) 15 days prior to start of execution.
c) AE shall review the submission within 10 days of receipt in consultation with
Authority and PSO and suggest changes if required.
d) AE to review execution at site as per his discretion and record his
observation and test results for works executed for reporting in Monthly
progress report.
e) In case of tests conducted shows, Defects or Deficiencies EPC Contractor
has to carry out remedial measures and has to submit report on same
f) AE shall ask EPC Contractor to carry out tests and has to ascertain the
remedial measures are successful and work is in line with standards and
specification as described in Contract Agreement.
g) In event of AE finding any result of an examination, inspection,
measurement or testing, any Plant, Materials, design or workmanship to be
defective or otherwise not in accordance with the provisions of this
Agreement, the Authority’s Engineer has to reject the same
4. Limitations
This is just a guideline issued in project interest for consistent quality throughout the entire stretch. Contractor reserves the rights vested as per
the contract terms & conditions. The above guidelines shall not be treated as any addendum or variation to the original contract.
2. References
This Document has drawn reference from following:
3. Identification of steps
3.1 Authority Review & Approval Process for Risk Management
a) The Contractor shall prepare and submit
copy of risk register along with necessary
particulars, shall be submitted to the
Authority representative (AE) at least 10
working days prior to end of Month.
b) AE shall review the risk register based on
i. Follow-up on previous Risk event
ii. Occurrence of any new risk event
c) AE shall Proceed with review as per
section 4.2 of Guidelines. Post the review,
if there is need for a stakeholder meeting
on any of risk event identified critical, the
same shall be to Authority to about the
objective.
d) If need of meeting is justified, the
Authority to set up meeting with
stakeholder for update and action plan to
mitigate risk. Proceedings of the meeting
shall be recorded and risk register to be
updated with relevant information.
e) The risk register shall be submitted by
Authority as part of Monthly report to
authority and copy of same to contractor
to be provided for further updating.
f) Quarterly Project Risk review meeting
shall be undertaken by Authority for
review and to take stock on mitigation
plan.
g) After the contracted works are
completed, the risk register shall be
updated and incorporated as part of
lesson learned.
2. References
Document has drawn reference from the following Article/clause(s) of the EPC agreement:
1. Article 10 (Design and Construction of the Project Expressway), Engineering Procurement and Construction Agreement Vol. II
2. Clause 10.5 (Extension of Time for Completion), Engineering Procurement and Construction Agreement Vol. II
3. Identification of steps
3.1. Authority Review & Approval Process for events with Non- Continuing effect
a) The Contractor shall review if event or circumstance shall have non-Continuing effect on work(s) impacted. If so, following steps shall be
followed for submission and approval of authority.
b) The Contractor shall submit notice to Authority Engineer (AE) wrt to clause 10.5.1 along with necessary particulars of event and reasonable
details for AE to examine occurrence of impact and its effect.
c) The Contractor Submission shall be made within 15 Business Days of contractor become aware about event and forwarded to AE with 3 hard
copies and via e-mail with copy to Authority and Project Support Office (PSO).
d) AE shall, within 15days of Notice from contractor, examine submission in consultation with Authority for any further clarification that may
be required to determine EOT from contractor. And shall request clarification for completeness of submission in writing from contractor.
e) Contractor on receipt of clarification shall respond with supporting documents and details for AE to determine EOT within 10 days of receipt.
f) In cases, no clarification requested by AE and On receipt of clarification from contractor, AE shall review submission and details of previous
EOT and shall judiciously determine EOT due to occurrence event and if total EOT approved need to be increased for the project, within 15
days and forward his recommendation to Authority with 2 (Two) hard copy & email copy.
g) Authority with support of PSO & Finance and Administrative shall provide recommendation and decision on award of EOT to Contractor Via
AE in writing.
3.2. Authority Review & Approval Process for events with Continuing effect
h) The Contractor shall review if event or circumstance shall have Continuing effect on work(s) impacted. If so, following steps shall be followed
for submission and approval of authority.
i) The Contractor shall submit notice to Authority Engineer (AE) wrt to clause 10.5.5 along with necessary particulars of event and reasonable
details for AE to examine occurrence of impact and its effect.
j) The Contractor Submission shall be made within 10 Days of after the close of each month for interim payment and for final submission shall
be submitted within 30days after the effect ceases.
k) AE shall, within 15days of Notice from contractor, examine submission in consultation with Authority for any further clarification that may
be required to determine EOT from contractor. And shall request clarification for completeness of submission in writing from contractor.
l) Contractor on receipt of clarification shall respond with supporting documents and details for AE to determine EOT within 10 days of receipt.
m) In cases, no clarification requested by AE and On receipt of clarification from contractor, AE shall review submission and details of previous
EOT and shall judiciously determine EOT due to occurrence event and if total EOT approved need to be increased for the project, within 15
days and forward his recommendation to Authority with 2 (Two) hard copy & email copy.
n) Authority with support of PSO & Finance and Administrative shall review recommendation for CE and provide recommendation and decision
on award of EOT to Contractor Via AE in writing.
Form No.
Form Name: Log for Extension of Time
Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway
Contract Package Appointment Date Signature
Contractor Name
Number
Scheduled
AE Name Log Update Date
Completion Date
Name of Team Leader, AE
Base Value of the Revised Contract Revised Completion
contract, INR value Date
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
2. References
Guidelines has drawn reference from Article 10 “Design & Construction” and Schedule B, C, D & I of EPC Contract Volume II
3. Identification of steps
3.1 Appointment of Design Director, Safety & Proof Consultants
a) The Contractor shall appoint “Design Director” within 20 days of Appointed Date (cl. 10.1.1) to get the designs and construction drawings
prepared.
b) Contractor shall appoint Proof Consultant (cl. 10.2.2) who has adequate experience in Highways and Structures, and is appointed by the
Contractor with the consent of the Authority from panel of three firms.
c) Safety Consultant to be appointed by the Contractor with the consent of the Authority from panel of three firms (cl. 10.1.5).
3.2 Preparation & Submission of GAD (if not already available).
a) Contractor / Design Director to prepare GAD drawings as per in accordance with Schedule B, C, D & I.
b) GAD Drawings to be verified & checked by Proof Consultant & Safety Consultant. In case of any drawings are inconsistent, proof consultant
should forward it back to contractor with comments, else must approve the same & revert.
c) In case any comments are received from Proof Consultant & Safety Consultant, the suggested comments must be incorporated in the GAD
drawings & sent for checking again. If GAD drawings are found to be in order, Contractor to send the same to AE for his review & comments.
d) AE to review the GADs & shall revert in 15 days with his comments. Contractor should incorporate those changes & resubmit the GAD to AE
for review.
e) If any structure is passing over any railway alignments, GAD drawings then must be forwarded to Authority for approval of Railway
Authorities. Otherwise must be forwarded to Contractor for preparation of Design & Drawings.
f) Authority to pass the GAD drawings to Railway Authorities to obtain GAD approval. If any comments are received from Railway Authorities,
same changes must be incorporated by contractor & resubmitted to Railway Authority.
3.3 Preparation of Designs & Drawings.
a) After receiving GAD approvals, Contractors should carry out preparations of designs & drawings based on details of design standardization
provided in section 6.3.
b) Contractor must get design & detail drawings prepared & vetted by proof & safety consultants before forwarding it to AE for his review.
c) If any comments are received from Proof Consultant & Safety Consultant, the suggested comments must be incorporated in the Designs &
Drawings & sent for checking again. If Designs & Drawings are found to be in order, Contractor to send the same to AE for his review &
comments.
d) AE must review & comment on detailed design & drawings and revert contractor within 15 days (30 days for major bridges or structures)
after receipt of drawings.
e) If any comments/ inconsistencies are identified by AE, the same shall be complied by contractor and revised drawings must be resubmitted.
f) AE after submission of revised drawings must revert with its observations within 10 days after receipt of drawings.
g) If contractor fails to resubmit revised drawings, AE may withhold payments for the affected works.
h) If any structure is passing over any railway alignments, detailed Designs & Drawings then shall be forwarded to Authority for approval of
Railway Authorities to obtain relevant approvals
i) Once detailed Designs & Drawings are approved, they must be considered as GFC drawings. Contractors may prepare other relevant detail
drawings required for construction.
j) If no review or comments are received from AE on any drawings shall relieve contractor of its obligations and hence may start construction.
k) In case of structures like ROB and RUB, EPC Contactor shall take shutdown or launching permission before execution of works
3.4 Preparation & Submission of ‘As- Built’ Drawings.
a) Once the execution is completed EPC Contractor within 90 days shall prepare and submit ‘As- Built’ drawings to AE
b) AE shall scrutinize, countersign and shall forward the same to the Authority
c) Authority upon receiving ‘As- Built’ drawings shall sign and send one copy each to AE and EPC Contractor
4. Limitations
This is just a guideline issued in project interest for consistent quality throughout the entire stretch. Contractor reserves the rights vested as per
the contract terms & conditions. The above guidelines shall not be treated as any addendum or variation to the original contract.
Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway Drawing Tracker for Road Works for CP: -_____
Sno. Contractor Contractor Description Checked by Drawing AE AE Contractor Revised Clearance Remarks
Letter No. Letter Proof Status Letter Letter Revised Drawing from AE for
Dated consultant No. Dated Drawing Submission Construction
(Approved/
and safety Submission Letter Date
Approved
Consultant Letter No.
with
(yes/No) Comments/
Rejected
6.2 Structure & Tunnel Drawing Status Tracker (to be maintained by AE)
Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway Drawing Tracker for Structure Works for CP: -_____
Structure ID Drawing Status Design Status
Type of Chainage Classification Submission Status AE Submission Status AE
Clearance from
Structure (Foundation/ Sub- Letter No. (Approved/ Letter Letter No. (Approved/ Letter
AE for
Structure/ Super- Approved with No. Approved with No.
Construction
Structure) Comments/ Comments/
Rejected) Rejected)
Subject: Standardization of Procurement Process for Construction Materials for NMSCEW Project
Preamble
The Nagpur Mumbai Super Communication Expressway (NMSCEW) is a 701km long road project, with varied
topography and physical attributes involve 16 EPC packages with same number of Contractors and Authority
Engineers. The project besides entailing multiple stakeholders, is very large in scale and complex in nature.
Fundamentally, in all such projects, with quality being of paramount importance warrants for standardization and
consistency in the quality of construction materials.
Authority’s Engineers (AE) are according approvals to various construction materials. However, it is observed that
selection of construction materials (viz. cement, steel, construction chemicals, etc.)/vendors is not standard and
uniform across various packages. Such choice of construction materials/vendors may lead to inconsistency in the
overall project quality.
In view of the above, a set of guidelines prescribing parameters for selection of construction materials/vendors was
contemplated and discussed during various meetings and site visits. Consequent to the detailed discussion and
deliberation on the need to ensure a standard quality all across the project, irrespective of different packages, the
following guidelines for the procurement of construction materials/vendors have been designed.
The sole objective of these guidelines hereunder is to ensure uniformity, consistency and standardization in the
overall project quality, complying and adhering to the Specifications and Standards as set forth in EPC contract
and at the same time follow the best engineering practice of the Construction Industry.
It may be noted that there has been a sincere effort to populate more and more vendors in the list to keep it
competitive and at the same time fair amount of effort has gone to encourage local and regional entrepreneurship
with no compromise on quality or technical specifications.
A. Any subject material must be introduced post approval of the respective Project Director (PD), in
compliance to applicable Guidelines and relevant annexures.
B. AEs shall ensure that the respective EPC contractor adhere to these guidelines or any separate/additional
correspondence issued under this subject from time to time.
C. This is not a comprehensive list, and the undersigned may update and issue additional guidelines as
deemed necessary in future.
D. It may be noted that while these Guidelines are suggestive in nature, adherence to these are considered
to be an important and a crucial compliance for attaining the intended objective of quality and consistency
across the project.
Considering the nature, magnitude and importance of the project including timeline, enumerated below is a
list of vendors identified for material procurement post consideration of overall technical compliance,
background of the companies, interest expressed and capacity for continued supply and service.
It may be noted that, for no reason whatsoever, such listing shall mean or warranty any compromise on the
contractual obligations including ITP, MTP, QAP, etc., as envisaged on the subject clauses.
ANNEXURE 1 - Cement
Use of Cement shall conform to relevant MoRTH, IRC and IS guidelines and codes, respectively.
List of Vendors identified for material procurement:
1. Ultratech
2. ACC
3. JSW
4. Dalmia
5. Ambuja
6. Orient
7. Kalburgi
8. Birla Gold
9. India Cements
.
ANNEXURE 2 – Reinforcement Steel (Except ROBs)
Use of Steel, for reinforcement, shall conform to relevant MoRTH, IRC and IS guidelines and codes, respectively.
List of Vendors identified for material procurement:
1. SAIL
2. TATA
3. JSW
4. RINL
5. Kamdhenu NXT TMT Bars, Kamdhenu Limited
6. Kalika TMT Bars, Kalika Steel Alloys Pvt. Ltd., Jalna
7. Polaad Steels (Bhagyalaxmi Group), Jalna
8. Sangam TMX TMT Steel (Mahalaxmi TMT Pvt. Ltd.), Wardha
9. Guardian Steels Pvt. Ltd.
.
ANNEXURE 3 - Crystalline Durability Admixture
In packages 8, 9 and 10 – detailed specifications for use of this material are provided in Corrigendum to Schedule-
D issued on March, 24 2018. Similarly, for packages 14, 15 and 16 – detailed specifications for use of this material
are provided in Sr. No. 8 of Corrigendum to Schedule-D issued on July, 06 2018. In both cases, the detailed
specifications are the same.
However, in packages 1 and 2, and 11, 12, and 13 – detailed specifications for the subject material are not
mentioned. Also, in packages 3 to 7 – detailed specifications of the subject material were present in the original
tender document. Inadvertently, they were deleted in the subsequent Corrigendum.
Therefore, to ensure durability, consistency, uniformity and quality, Crystalline Durability Admixture must be used
in all construction packages and shall follow the below mandatory specifications.
As per the recent guidelines of MoRTH, integral crystalline durability admixtures shall be added in the concrete to
enhance the concrete durability. It shall be used for both pavement quality concrete (PQC) and structural concrete
for all structures including bridges, culverts, shotcrete inside tunnels including tunnel lining and at portals. The
crystalline admixture shall be added either at the time of batching at the batching plant or in the drum of the transit
mixer, when the concrete arrives at the point of pouring.
1. Dosage - 0.8% by weight of cement + cementitious material (or such dosage as desired to meet durability
criteria).
2. The crystalline admixture shall be compatible with any other concrete admixture confirming to ASTM D494.
3. The product must have both, IRC accreditation as well as MoRTH accreditation.
4. Material shall fulfil the requirements of American Concrete Institute guidelines ACI-212-3R-10 Chapter 15 and
fall under PRAH (permeability reducing admixtures for hydrostatic conditions) and must reduce coefficient of
permeability of concrete by min. 70% (preferably 90% or zero permeability), when compared to control concrete
and tested as per DIN 1048 PART 5 by carrying out 4 cycles each of 5 bar hydrostatic pressure for 72 hours and
drying for 48 hours between the cycles & co-efficient of permeability calculated as per Darcy’s formula/ Valenta
equation by incorporating penetration values obtained at the end of fourth cycle pressure.
5. The material must reduce chloride diffusion co-efficient by minimum 45% when tested as per ASTM C 1556-4
and compared with the control concrete, thereby prolonging the durability & service life of the treated concrete
structure.
7. Must demonstrate minimum reduction of 20% in shrinkage cracks as compared to control concrete, as per BS
ISO-1920-8:2009.
8. Must demonstrate no internal expansion under sulphate attack, when tested as per ASTM C-1012-12.
9. The crystalline admixture must be capable of self-healing of cracks up to a width of 0.5mm.
10. Product must possess third party assurance, confirming that the product, when used in the concrete, will have
no detrimental side effects in terms of alkali silica reaction (ASR), corrosion of steel re-enforcement etc., as per
the requirements of DIN 18998.
Mandatory Testing Of Crystalline Durability Admixture:
The selected material must be tested at the labs given below:
1 Material shall fulfil the requirements of American Concrete Permeability 1. Structwel Lab, Facility available at this
Institute guidelines ACI-212-3R-10 Chapter 15 and fall Coefficient Navi Mumbai Lab as per NABL
under PRAH (permeability reducing admixtures for Reduction as per Accreditation.
2. Central Building
hydrostatic conditions) and must reduce coefficient of DIN 1048 Part 5 &
Research Institute
permeability of concrete by min. 70% (preferably 90% or Darcy's formula
(CBRI) , Roorkee
zero permeability), when compared to control concrete and Valenta
and tested as per DIN 1048 PART 5 by carrying out 4 Equation 3. VJTI, Mumbai
cycles each of 5 bar hydrostatic pressure for 72 hours and
drying for 48 hours between the cycles & co-efficient of 4. NABL
permeability calculated as per Darcy’s formula/ Valenta Accredited Labs
equation by incorporating penetration values obtained at
the end of fourth cycle pressure.
4 Must demonstrate minimum reduction of 20% in Reduction in 1.IMM Soil Sdn ISO 9000, ISO 17025
shrinkage cracks as compared to control concrete, as per Shrinkage Cracks Bhd, Malaysia accredited Lab having
BS ISO-1920-8:2009. as per ISO-1920-8 facility to test
2.Instituto
Shrinkage cracks in
Must demonstrate no internal expansion under sulphate Sulphate Mechanica Die
concrete as per ISO-
attack, when tested as per ASTM C-1012-12 resistance of the Materiali SA,
1920-8.
concrete as per Switzerland
ASTM C- 1012 / Sulphate resistance of
3.Holanda
SN EN 206-1 the concrete as per
Engenharia Ltda
ASTM C 1012 / SN EN
5 The crystalline admixture must be capable of self-healing Self-Healing of Rodovia
206-01.
of cracks up to a width of 0.5mm. cracks up to 0.5 Presidente Dutra,
mm s/n - Km 310 , Test Self-Healing
Itatiaia, RJ , CEP behaviour of the
27580-000, Brazil concrete
List of Vendors identified for material procurement:
1. CD Seal Waterproofing, USA
2. Penetron India Pvt. Ltd.
3. Slurry Inc., USA
ANNEXURE 4 - Admixtures
Concrete chemical admixtures are proprietary items of manufacture and shall be obtained only from established
manufacturers with proven track record, quality assurance and laboratory facilities.
As the selection of an appropriate concrete admixture is an integral part of the mix design, the EPC contractors
shall recommend the use of such products only after obtaining complete information of all the actual constituents
of concrete as well as methodologies of the admixture manufacturer, transportation and compaction of concrete
proposed in the works.
Admixtures/additives shall conform to IS-9103:1999 (REAFFIRMED 2004) (AMENDMENT NO. 2, AUGUST 2007)
A. Physical properties
Properties Description
Physical appearance Rubbery mass self levelling
1k or 2k One component
Density 1.35
Solid content 98%
Surface dry 30 ⁰C 2-3 hrs.
Hard dry 5-6 hrs.
Tack free time @30 ⁰C 8-10 hrs.
Full cure 24 hrs.
Elastic recovery rate % 100
Flow 0 mm
Fuel resistance Resistant
Elongation at break 600%
Shore a hardness 15
Service temp - 40 ⁰ to 80 ⁰C
Movement capability ˃25% - 30%
Tensile strength mpa 1.0 to 1.5
Flame resistance Pass
Environment friendly Yes / odorless
Shelf life 9 months
Colours TO BE DECIDED BY PD
B. All concrete of all grades used for all structural works shall be added with traversing type corrosion
inhibiting (TTCI) powder additive at the dosage of 0.30 kg per cubic meter of concrete.
C. All tests must be conducted at and by CSIR-CECRI and IIT/ICT labs only
1. The inhibitor shall form corrosion inhibitive, monomolecular film in vapor phase.
2. The typical minimum bond energy of this film (analyzed by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) shall be as
follows:
A. (Fe-n): >350 ev
B. (Fe-ca): >320 ev
C. (Fe-o): >450 ev
D. (Fe-C): >280 eV
1 The material should form a molecular layer on the steel Bond values of 1. IIT Bombay Or ICT Method model
rebars and the bond of elements N, Ca, O with Fe should elements forming Mumbai should be
be of covalent nature and the values shall be as follows: the protective Multilab 2000 or
AND
molecular layer on ESCALAB Xi
a. (Fe-N): >350 eV
the rebars 2. CSIR-CECRI. +Thermo Fischer
b. (Fe-Ca): >320 eV
Scientific
c. (Fe-O): >450 eV Testing should be done
d. (Fe-C): >280 eV from both the Institutes
and not either.
The testing shall be done using the X-ray photo electron
spectroscopy (XPS) instrument.
2 The material should conform to NACE TMO 208 (Grade 4) Vapour inhibiting 1. IIT Bombay or ICT
category or should have no spots (pass) the JIS 1535 test ability of the Mumbai AND
vapour phase TTCI 2. E-Cube Consultants,
additive. Thane. (NABL
accredited lab)
Testing should be done
from all the Institutes
and not either.
3 Product must possess third party certification, confirming Compressive 1. IIT Mumbai or ICT
that the product, when used in the concrete, will not affect strength of Mumbai AND
the compressive strength of the hardened concrete. concrete with TTCI 2. E-Cube Consultants,
admixture Thane. (NABL
accredited lab)
Testing should be done
from all the Institutes and
not either.
QUALIFYING CRITERIA PARAMETER TO BE APPROVED REMARKS
TESTED LABORATORY
4 The TTCI admixture should have been tested as per Inhibition Efficiency 1. CSIR- Same approved lab
ASTM G 59. Inhibition efficiency should be at least 85% CECRI criteria For Sr. No. 4
in PWS. And &5
2. ICT
5 The TTCI admixture should be tested as per ASTM G Polarization Mumbai
106 and the values shall be as follows: resistance and
electrochemical Testing should be
1. At OCP: done from both
mechanism
Rs (ohms): 12 (minimum) the Institutes and
Rp (ohms): 6000 (minimum) not either.
Cdl (mho): 7.15 x 10-5
2. At 200mV
Rs (ohms): 12 (minimum)
Rp (ohms): 620 (minimum)
Cdl (mho): 0.9 x 10-4
[As per IRC15 : 2017, MORTH Specifications (Amended), IS 16481, ACI Committee 544), IS 16481 -
Textiles - Synthetic Micro-Fibres for Use in Cement Based Matrix – Specification]
As per published research papers by Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) Delhi, it is recommended to use
Fibrillated Polypropylene Fibres for better performance and uniform mixing. As per CRRI Fibrillated fibres are
more effective in reducing settlement and controlling drying shrinkage of concrete.
Only Virgin Synthetic Fibres inert to concrete environment shall be used as secondary reinforcement. (Ref.
Document IS 16481)
1. Dosage –
As per IRC and MoRTH 0.6 – 2.5 Kg/M3 for Micro Fibres. However, to achieve the optimum fibre count, it is
proposed that the dosing shall be as per IRC SP 46: 2013 (Page 04 Clause 3.4) i.e. Minimum 0.1% by
volume of Concrete
As per IS 16481, the polymeric synthetic fibres mainly includes
a. Polypropylene (Sp. Gravity 0.90 to 0.91)
The Dosing of fibre per Cubic Meter of Concrete is proposed as under :
For Polypropylene fibres 0.91 kgs / M3 of Concrete
2. Effective Diameter : 8 – 300 Micron (IRC 15)
3. Length : About 20 mm (IRS SP 46 Clause 3.5 Page No., 4)
4. Water Absorption : < 0.45% (IRC 15)
5. Specific Gravity : 0.90 to 1.36 (IRC 15)
6. Melting Point : Shall not be < 1600C (IRC 15)
7. Aspect Ratio : 200 to 2000 (IRC 15)
8. Synthetic Fibres shall have good alkali and UV light Resistance (IRC 15)
Mandatory testing of fibers:
The selected material must be tested for qualifying criteria at the following approved laboratories:
2. Eq. Diameter
3. Fibre Length
4. Aspect Ratio
6. Water Absorption
As per IRC15 : 2017 and IRC SP 46 : 2013, BS EN 14889-2: 2006 Part 2 & BS EN 10002 Part 1, British
Tunnelling Society and Institution of Civil Engineers Specification for Tunnelling (BTS)
Only Virgin Macro Synthetic Structural Fibres inert to shotcrete / concrete environment shall be used as in
Tunnel Shotcrete and/or in Concrete Lining.
Macro Synthetic Structural fibre shall comply with following code specifications:
d. Orientation of Fibres shall be Continuously Embossed surface anchorage mechanism to encourage bond
with Concrete or Shotcrete to be used in tunnels.
e. Suggested Dosages of the fibres shall be 5 to 9 kg per cubic meter of Concrete for in-situ or Pre Cast Tunnel
Lining or in tunnel Shotcrete.
h. Fibres shall have excellent Resistance to Alkali and Acid (Totally Inert Material)
j. The manufacturing Facility shall have ISO 9001 Certification for Quality Management.
Mandatory testing of fibers:
The selected material must be tested for qualifying criteria at the following approved laboratories:
3. Fibre Length
4. Aspect Ratio
6. Water Absorption
2. Sieve analysis
Pan 100.0 0
SiO2% 83.4
NA2O% 9.58
AI2O3% 3.00
CAO% 3.20
K2O% 0.52
Fe2O3% 0.40
P2O5% 0.32
TiO2% 0.21
SO3% 0.15
CI% 0.069
5. Mandatory Testing:
The selected material must be tested at the labs given below:
PARAMETER TO APPROVED
QUALIFYING CRITERIA REMARKS
BE TESTED LABORATORY
Test is
In accordance with
conducted at the
IS 2386 (Part –II) Govt. accredited NABL
2) Organic impurities test field, for every 20
than that specified Labs
cum or part
in the code.
there.