Caroline LSA1Part1 Marked
Caroline LSA1Part1 Marked
SEPTEMBER 2012
DELTA AT INTERNATIONAL HOUSE, NEWCASTLE
CAROLINE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 06
1
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
2. Language Analysis
2.1 Meaning and Use
2.2 Form
2.2.1 Tense forms go back one
2.2.2 Modal verbs which change
2.2.3 Modal verbs which do not change
2.2.4 Changes in expressions of time and place
2.2.5 Pronouns and possessive adjectives change
2.2.6 Word changes/paraphrasing
2.2.7 Negative commands use ‘not to’
2.2.8 Questions using if or whether
2.2.9 Reporting verbs
2.3 Pronunciation
3. Problems and Solutions
4. Conclusion
5. References
2
1. INTRODUCTION
During my time teaching in Japan I found that Japanese learners were generally very
adept at activities designed to practice grammar. Their education system continues
to place great importance on direct translation and grammatical accuracy, as these
skills must be demonstrated on university entrance exams. Commonly featured are
exercises which require methodically changing direct speech into reported speech.
Although the students I encountered were able to demonstrate a basic awareness of
the ‘rules’ they had to follow, I noticed that outside of highly controlled activities even
my high-level learners struggled. This was particularly the case when the students
were asked to choose which appropriate reporting verb to use. Parrott explains:
‘Learners need not only to understand the meaning of the verbs they
use, but they also need to know the construction of the clause which
follows each verb… Learners often consider this to be the biggest
problem with reported speech.’ (2005:226)
I feel that Parrott is right, and this is what seemed to be happening with my students
in Japan. After speaking to other teachers about this issue, it seems to be a common
problem with learners. My current group of students at International House,
Newcastle also make mistakes when using reported speech.
This assignment limits itself to the use of reported speech in the written form and
does not cover the spoken form.
3
2. LANGUAGE ANALYSIS
.
2.1 Meaning and Use
It should be noted that reported speech can also be referred to as ‘indirect speech’
or ‘indirect discourse’.
Reported speech is used to express the meaning of what someone has said or
written, often from the reporter’s point of view. As Thornbury rightly points out:
Reported speech is common in news reporting and in some types of
formal official texts, such as the minutes of meetings and police
statements. (2006: 198)
I would take his comment further and add that the media also often mixes reported
and direct speech in order to bring a person’s words or feelings to the forefront. In
doing so it is typically only words or phrases that are quoted:
The stepfather of Megan Stammers has said he is "overjoyed" she has been found
safe and well in France. (BBC, 2012)
It is rarely used to communicate a person’s exact words, and there are many ways in
which to change one utterance of direct speech into reported speech. It is also used
to show how the reporter feels about what he/she is reporting:
He boasted that he didn’t need to study to pass the exam.
Reported speech is used to summarise or select content based on what the reporter
wants to communicate. It can be used to reflect the bias of the reporter (or the
organization he/she works for, such as a newspaper). The person whose words are
being reported has no control in terms of selectivity and/or paraphrasing.
2.2 Form
4
Reported speech takes the general form of subject + (reporting) simple past verb +
clause (e.g. David said that he wanted to go). Quotation and question marks are not
necessary when writing in reported speech, and the use of ‘that’ is often dropped in
‘that’ clauses.
When changing from direct into reported speech, several grammatical rules need to
be adhered to. The following ‘transformation rules’ are taken from Parrott (2005):
In the following example the simple present changes into the simple past:
Julie: “I hate pizza.” - She said (that) she hated pizza.
However, if we want to make it clear that the original statement is still true (and this
includes general truths), the tense does not need to change.
Julie: “I love cucumber!” - She said that she loves cucumber.
“Smoking is bad for you.” - She said that smoking is bad for you.
5
(Tables adapted from Parrott)
The modal verbs ‘can’, I may go to the pub later He said he might go to the pub later.
‘may’ and ‘must’
change I must tell him. She said she had to tell him.
6
John: “I couldn’t drink the wine.” - He said he couldn’t drink the wine.
*Others which do not change are might, ought, should and would.
John: “Come here tomorrow.” - John told him to go there the next day.
*Others follow the same pattern.
Chris: “I don’t want to read your essay.” - He said he didn’t want to read my essay.
7
(Others follow the same pattern.)
Mike: “Is it okay if I go home early? I have to pick Eli up from Sarah’s.” - Mike asked
if it was alright to leave work early so he could pick Eli up from his mother’s.
Reported questions keep the same general word order, and if/whether/to are used.
Question marks are not used:
Robin: “Do you want to grab a bite?”
- He asked me if I wanted to grab a bite.
- He asked me whether I wanted to go for something to eat with him (or not).
- He asked me out to dinner.
This sub-section looks at reporting verbs and the clauses that follow them. These
examples are taken directly from Parrott: (2005: 218-219)
8
He told me to go. infinitive
He told me where to go. question word + infinitive
He told me a lie. noun phrase
2.3 Pronunciation
9
(‘Paul said, <pause>) “Sarah’s beautiful.”’ - Paul said Sarah was beautiful.
Reported questions are delivered as statements, with no final rise in intonation:
(Paul said, <pause>) “Do you want one?” - Paul asked me if I wanted one.
10
3. PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS
11
Problem: Misusing pronouns in reported speech
As reported speech is generally heard out of context, using the correct pronouns is
essential in order to avoid misunderstanding. I have noticed the misuse of pronouns
to be a problem with students of all levels when two or more people are involved in
what is being reported. For example: “Caz, where is the station?” She asked me
where the station was, instead of She asked Caz (you) where the station was.
Solution: I find it helps if students can visualise what they are reporting, how many
people are involved and what their general position is. I have tried assigning roles in
the classroom and had students read aloud from examples of direct speech. I found
that even after only doing so once, students’ misuse of pronouns decreased. I also
back this up with some basic multi-choice questions (like exercise 7 on p. 89 of the
Grammar Sense 4 Workbook)
Problem: Converting too literally from direct speech into reported speech
Based on my experience I think that many students misunderstand the usage of
reported speech and think that they should try to use the speaker’s original words as
faithfully as possible. I agree with Parrott that this may be what is causing them to go
wrong:
‘Many mistakes in using reported speech may be caused by learners
who have practiced reported speech through unnaturally literal
transformation exercises. Mistakes tend to occur when learners are
thinking about the forms of the language rather than focusing on
what they want to convey.’ (2005, p.225)
12
Although there is clearly a need for students to be aware of the forms of the
language there certainly needs to be more balance between the focus put on form
and on meaning.
Solution: One of my colleagues in Japan had a lot of fun trying one of Ur’s ‘Grammar
Practice Activities’ (p. 136) in which she introduced the topic by interviewing a
volunteer at the front of the class on a variety of things (such as plans for the
weekend, what she did last week, etc.). She made sure to include different tenses
and expressions of time. She then asked the students to work in pairs and write a
short report based on the conversation they had just heard. This gave her the
chance to see how well they knew the structures of reported speech and which
reporting verbs to use. She noticed that students continued to use direct speech and
she needed to make it clearer that they should not attempt to write down her exact
words but paraphrase them in a report. She reflected that she should have used
ICQs before letting the students start writing.
This examination has given me a much greater awareness of the wide range of
issues which students are faced with when attempting to use reported speech. From
using correct punctuation to knowing which clause goes with different reporting
verbs, it is little wonder that even high-level learners experience difficulties,
particularly as a result of the numerous grammatical elements they have to consider.
Peet says that:
It’s important therefore to present reported speech in a clear and
effective context. (online)
I couldn’t agree with him more, as this is essential if we are to encourage learners to
see a need for the new language. We have looked at numerous ways in which
reported speech can be used, the flavour it adds to the reporting of what has been
said and the subtleties it contains. We have to keep looking for new ways to help
learners embrace this language with such potential for description, instead of
avoiding it.
14
5. REFERENCES
Foley, M. (2006) Total English Upper Intermediate Workbook (with Key). Longman.
Gidengil, E & Everitt, J. (2003) Talking Tough: Gender and Reported Speech in
Campaign News Coverage, Political Communication, 20: 209-232.
Ur, P. (1988) Grammar Practice Activities – A Practical Guide for Teachers, C.U.P.
15