6656 18336 1 SM
6656 18336 1 SM
net/publication/287106977
CITATIONS READS
7 14,446
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Hooi Peng Lim on 19 September 2018.
6
Development Goals (MDGs) of improving access to safe drinking water by halve
5.8
ahead of the 2015 has prompted the need to feasible conversion and sustainable
5.6
solutions. This study investigated the efficiency of activated carbon from coconut
5.4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
shells as the potential cost effective absorbent material in drinking water filter due to its
Level of filtering nature of greater micro-pores, inexpensive and abundantly available over other
agricultural by-products. Activation of the coconut shell carbon was first carried out by
carbonization in the exposure to nitrogen (N2) atmosphere followed by heating with
the activating agents for a specific retention period. pH test and dynamic testing of
filtered water were conducted using the protocol established by ANSI/NSF Standard
53 (Health Effects of Water Treatment System). The pH value was indicated to increase
proportionally to the level of filtering, which has achieved a constant value of 6.41
after eight times of filtering. Additionally, the activated carbon has removed Methyl
Tertiary-butyl Ether (MTBE) to non-detectable level, which is less than 1 part per billion
(ppb). The non-detectable level has sufficiently reduced the odour and taste
problems. Therefore, activated carbon from coconut shells has considerable potential
as the cost effective absorptive material in a drinking water filter.
wt% and the sample has a mixed porous structure but is at a safe level to drink. Even though the drinking
when the degree of burn-off is between 50 wt% to 75 water treatment adheres to approved standards, the
wt%[3]. The later research of pore structures in residual contents of Iron, Manganese and Aluminium
activated carbon confirmed the linearity of pores size are considerable high causing precipitation in the
is ascended to the degree of burn-off[4]. household water distribution system and stay stagnant
in the distribution system. These residuals could have
2.3 Batch Experiments of Activated Carbon Absorption not washed away by self-cleaning velocity and
Capacity caused rusty in the pipe. In the present study, the pH
value of direct pipe water without using the filtration
Indication of pH value for filtered water was system by coconut shell activated carbons was
conducted to indicate the absorption capacity of measured to be an acidic solution at pH 5.5. Figure 1
coconut shell activated carbons by filtering the pipe illustrates the pH values of water filtered by activated
water with these activated carbons for a fixed carbons for up to ten levels of filtering which the fixed
thickness for up to ten times of filtering. Dynamic thickness of each filtering level was measured at 4
testing was carried out using the water filter with mm. The pH value was indicated to increase
optimized thickness indicated through pH testing proportionally to the level of filtering which has
according to ANSI/NSF Standard 53 (Health Effects of achieved a constant value of 6.41 after eight times of
Water Treatment Systems) to identify the MTBE filtering with minimum thickness for filter of 32 mm.
concentration of coconut shell activated carbons. The
MTBE is the most common oxygenated fuel additive 6.6
present in pipe water throughout the main filtration 6.4
process. Additionally, commercial coal derived
6.2
activated carbon was used as a reference in
comparison with the MTBE absorption. pH value 6
5.8
5.4
3.1 Burn-off Degree of Coconut Shell Activated 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Carbons Level of filtering
The total mass of the activated carbons after Figure 1 pH values of samplings vs level of filtering
subjecting to chemical activation process was
indicated as 362 gram. Equation (2) showed the value
of burn-off degree of activated carbons at 27.6 wt% 3.3 Removal of MTBE by Activated Carbons
which is less than 50 wt%. Therefore, the porous
structures formed are identified as microspores. The methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) is the most
common oxygenated fuel additive presents in ground
= 500 – 362 x 100 (2) water throughout the main filtering process. MTBE is
500 normally added to petrol in controlled amount of less
= 27.6 wt% than 15% by volume to improve combustion and
reduce the exhaust emissions, especially carbon
The capacity of absorption of coconut shell activated monoxide. Ground water is always contaminated by
carbons relies predominantly on the existence of petrol spills and seen as a potentially severe threat to
micropores. Micropores exhibit molecular dimension drinking water supplies. Therefore, a comparative
of 0.6 nm to 1.6 nm where the adsorption in these study was carried out to indicate the efficiency of
molecular pores takes place by filling of volume[5]. The utilizing coconut shell activated carbons as the
capacity of absorption by these pores is greater than potential absorbent in drinking water filter by taking
macropores due to the protruding of the absorption the commercial coal activated carbons as reference.
forces by the pore’s walls adversely. The absorption is Yearly consumption of drinking water with MTBE level
commenced by capillary condensation. of approximately 20 to 40 parts per billion (ppb) is
acceptable and do not possess harm to human body
3.2 pH Value of Filtered Pipe Water by Activated according to EPA’s Drinking Water Advisory published
Carbons in 2012[6]. In this study, the MTBE level of tested
samplings was measured using dynamic testing in
The dosing of chlorine and fluoride as the disinfectants laboratory of Syarikat Air Johor (SAJ) at interval bed
in water treatment is specified under National volumes for up to 5m3. Table 2 shows the MTBE effluent
Standard for Drinking Water Quality (NSDWQ) and concentration (ppb) of sample without filtration;
strictly monitored by the Ministry of Health (MOH) in sample filtered using commercial coal and coconut
Malaysia. The amount of chlorine and fluoride used for shell activated carbons respectively. The trends of
disinfection is sufficient to destroy the microorganisms,
16 Suria, Lim Hooi Peng & Maryati / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 77:22 (2015) 13-17
Without filtration
14
that activated carbons by coconut shell has
12
consistently achieved high absorption capability to
10
remove the effluent of MTBE concentration into non
8 detect level which is less than 1 ppb. Therefore,
6 activated carbon from coconut shells has a
Coal
4 considerable potential as a cost effective absorbent
2 material in drinking water.
Coconut shell
0
1 2 3 4 5
Number of bed volume (m 3) Acknowledgement
Figure 2 MTBE effluent concentrations (ppb) of activated
The authors are grateful to Mohd Nur Asraf Mohd Khir,
carbon samplings
Abdul Qayyum Hamzah, Muhammad Faiszuddin Ishak
and Nur Insyirah Rafee for the contribution of
Nevertheless, a great difference was observed for conducting the experiments.
water without filtration where the concentration of
MTBE was recorded to have the highest reading at
12.8 ppb after 1m3 water was treated and ascended References
to 15.2 ppb after 5m3 water was treated. This is related
to the contamination of ground water in dense traffic [1] P. Shankar. 2008. Coconut Shell Based Activated Carbon
with No Green House Gas Emission, in Water Conditioning &
areas where the sample was taken. The commercial Purification, Singapore. Filtrex Technologies. 1-4.
coal based activated carbons were observed to [2] M. K. G. B. V. &. L. G. Grassi. 2012. Removal of Emerging
reduce the MTBE to about 5 ppb after 5m 3 water was Contaminants from Water and Wastewater by Absorption
treated. All the samplings were reported tasteless and Process In Emerging Compounds Removal from
without odour threshold which the MTBE Wastewater. Netherlands, Springer. 15-37.
[3] S. F. G. S. C. &. P. R. Pollard. 1992. Lowcost Adsorbents for
concentrations removed by these absorbents met the
Waste and Wastewater Treatment. A Review Science
current NSF standard for MTBE removal. The activated Environment. 116: 31-52.
carbons from coconut shell possessed substantially [4] R. &. K. R. W. Taylor. 1994. Removing Lead in Drinking Water
constant readings for MTBE concentration, whereas with Activated Carbon. Environmental Progress. 13(1): 65-
the readings for commercial coal based activated 70.
[5] A. Aygun, K. S. Yenisoy and I. Duman. 2003. Production of
carbon were observed to increase proportionally from granular activated carbon from fruit stones and nutshells
2.5 ppb to 5.02 ppb. This confirmed that the coconut and evaluation of their physical, chemical and adsorption
shell activated carbons contain predominance of high properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 66: 189-195.
porous microspores to absorb the high soluble MTBE. [6] C. Duran–Valle, S. Gomez–Corzo, V. Gomez–Serano, J.
Pastor–Villegas and M. Rojas–Cervantes. 2006. Preparation
of charcoal from cherry stones. Applied Surface Science.
252(17): 5957–5960.
4.0 CONCLUSION
17 Suria, Lim Hooi Peng & Maryati / Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering) 77:22 (2015) 13-17
[7] P. Paraskeva, D. Kalderis and E. Diamadopoulos, 2008. [11] M. Dubinin and E. D. Zaverina. 1955. Surface and sorption
Production of activated carbon from agricultural by- properties of active carbons. Bulletin of the Academy of
products. Journal of Chemical Technology and Sciences of the USSR. Division of Chemical Science . 4(4):
Biotechnology. 83(5): 581–592. 531-538.
[8] C. Toles. W. Marshall. L. Wartelle and A. McAloon. 2000. [12] Wan Daud, W. M. A., Wan Ali, W. S. and Sulaiman, M. Z.
Steam- or carbon dioxide-activated carbons from almond 2002. Effect of activation temperature on pore
shells: physical. chemical and adsorptive properties and development in activated carbon produced from palm
estimated cost of production. Bioresource Technology. 75( shell. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology.
3): 197–203. 78: 1-5.
[9] W. Tsai, C. Chang. S. Wang. C. Chang. S. Chien and H. Sun. [13] R. C. Bansal and M. Goyal. 2005. Activated Carbon
2001. Cleaner production of carbon adsorbents by utilizing Adsorption. United States: CRC Press.
agricultural waste corn cob. Resources Conservation [14] E. P. Agency. 2012. 2012 Edition Of The Drinking Water
Recycling. 32: 42-53. Standards And Health Advisories. Office of Water U.S.
[10] M. Valixa, W. Cheung and G. McKay. 2004. Preparation of Environmental Protection Agency . Washington. DC.
activated carbon using low temperature carbonisation and
physical activation of high ash raw bagasse for acid dye
adsorption." Chemosphere. 56(5): 493–501.