Scribd
Upload
18 views2 pages

HC - Writ Petition - Rama Nand Sharma - 7279 of 2025 - 5 May 2025

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh has allowed the petitioners, Rama Nand Sharma and others, to file representations regarding their grievances, which will be considered in light of a previous judgment. The court directed that these representations be decided within six weeks, ensuring the petitioners have the opportunity to be heard. The petitioners retain the right to pursue further legal action if they remain unsatisfied with the outcome.

Uploaded by

Hitu Assudani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
18 views2 pages

HC - Writ Petition - Rama Nand Sharma - 7279 of 2025 - 5 May 2025

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh has allowed the petitioners, Rama Nand Sharma and others, to file representations regarding their grievances, which will be considered in light of a previous judgment. The court directed that these representations be decided within six weeks, ensuring the petitioners have the opportunity to be heard. The petitioners retain the right to pursue further legal action if they remain unsatisfied with the outcome.

Uploaded by

Hitu Assudani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

CWP No.7279 of 2025


Date of Decision: 05.05.2025
_______________________________________________________

.
Rama Nand Sharma and Others …….Petitioners

.P
Versus
State of H.P. and Others ….Respondents
_______________________________________________________

H
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate.

of
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr.
Rajan Kahol, Mr. B.C. Verma and Mr. Vishal
Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with

rt
Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate
General, for State.
_______________________________________ _____________
ou
Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Before notices, if any, could be issued in the instant
C

proceedings, learned counsel representing the petitioners, on

instructions, states that petitioners would be content and satisfied in


h

case they are permitted to file representation(s) for redressal of their


ig

grievance, with further direction to the respondents to consider and

decide the same in light of judgment dated 01.11.2023, passed by


H

Division Bench of this Court in CWPOA No.5536 of 2020 titled as

Sanjay Kumar Vs. State of H.P. and Others, along with other

connected matters, in a time bound manner.

2. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondents,

Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that he

1
Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 15/08/2025 00:33:11 :::CIS


2

is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the

petitioners and representation(s), if any, filed by the petitioners shall

.
be considered and decided in accordance with the aforesaid

.P
judgment.

3. Consequently, in view of the aforesaid fair stand adopted

H
by learned Additional Advocate General, this Court, without going into

of
the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition

reserving liberty to the petitioners to file representation(s) before the

rt
competent authority within a period of two weeks for redressal of their

grievance, which in-turn, shall be decided by the competent authority,


ou
expeditiously, preferably, within a period of six weeks in light of

aforesaid judgment. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority


C

concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall

afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners and pass


h

speaking order thereafter. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file


ig

appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law, if they still


H

remain aggrieved.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

p`

(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge
May 05, 2025
(Rajeev Raturi)

::: Downloaded on - 15/08/2025 00:33:11 :::CIS

You might also like