So today's a big day.

It finally finally

happened. GPT5, you can see it right

there, is finally out. It's available in

chat GPT. It's available through the

API. And I've been waiting to make this

video to tell you all about it and to

discuss what this means for most users

since well, early 2024 really. That's

the first time they kind of teased it.

What we're going to talk about today is

first of all that this is the brand new

model that is going to be the default in

chat GPT. Matter of fact, they nuked all

other models. This is the only one you

get to choose from here on out. No more

thinking selection. And also, it's

available across all plans. So, if

you're a free user, this is probably the

happiest day for you when it comes to AI

releases ever because they're making

this available to everybody, ranging

from the free all the way to the $200

pro plan. What my plan is for this video

is I'm not going to run elaborate

benchmarks. not going to be building

esoteric games and physics simulations

and seeing if it's incrementally better

than what we saw before. I'll have

multiple examples in the end where we'll

be comparing it to the competition. I

think that matters. But mostly I want to

answer this one question that I have

written down on my paper here. And that

is what does this mean for most people?

What does this mean for your mom? What

does this mean for people at work? What

does this mean for students? What does

this mean for most people that don't

spend their entire free time nerding out

over AI and figuring out which model is

the best one in this particular week?

And I think there's a lot here, okay?

Not just that this is available to

everybody, but it also brings new

capabilities and merges a lot of old

capabilities into one system now. And my

hope is that this piece of content is

going to help you navigate that. And

it's and also I hope that this is going

to be a piece of content that will help

people who might have been sleeping on

the releases of the past few weeks or

months catch up and really get up to

speed so you don't feel behind and you

realize where we're at in AI space and

how to use this to your very own

advantage. So with that being said,

let's dive right into it. I'll start out

with summarizing what this release is

all about. There's a 90-minute live

stream if you want all the details. I'll

give you a quick summary here of what

matters. Then we'll be moving on to some

of the facts around it, like what's new

and how that realistically compares to

some of the competition and some of the

competition's best releases. Matter of

fact, this week, if you're not not

familiar, we had two big releases with

Opus 4.1 anthropics best model coming

out and Gemini deep think deep think

finally coming out. They announced this

um a few months back. It's out and then

OpenAI came out with this model which is

better at most things. That's kind of

the summary from what we've seen so far.

But in the end of this video, we'll be

going in and we'll be practically

looking at a few examples that matter to

me. We won't be looking at some of these

esoteric benchmarks or like test cases

that nobody would really be doing. I

want to look at a few things and that's

what we're going to be doing. I want to

look at the writing style. I want to

look at its ability to generate ideas

and I want to look at its ability to

recreate one of the demos, the one with

the castle we saw in the live stream. I

thought that one was really impressive.

I want to see how well Claude does at

that. We're going to compare that. So,

without further ado, let's dive right

into kind of the summary and the

overview of what GPT5 is about and what

you can expect. Before we do that, I

want to say one last thing and that is

where I'm coming from as you know your

presenter here today. And I want to

point out that I'm coming at it from a

power user perspective. At this point in

time, I did the rough calculation. I

have around 2,000 somewhere between two

and 3,000 hours just inside of chat GPT.

and its competitors like Claude or

Gemini. That's not even including the

development, the API side and usage of

these models. I've been doing this every

day since the release day of chat GPT. I

really I'm an obsessive type and I kind

of went all in on this. So, I'm going to

be giving you my perspective but with a

lot of empathy for somebody's

perspective who might just be coming in

or might just be catching up with this

topic. Okay. My primary use cases, I

think this is important, are not

development use cases. They're not

medical use cases. They're not I'm not

doing physics with this stuff. I'm

writing, I'm planning, I'm ideulating,

I'm using it for entrepreneurship, I'm

using it for marketing, I'm using it for

psychological tasks. I love that. Those

are my personal interests and that's

where I find it really empowers me. So

that's kind of the angle that I'm taking

here. a power user who is a more common

perspective on this rather than one of a

developer or one of a physicist or

mathematician evaluating these models.

So first of all, this is the flagship

model from OpenAI and it's going to be

replacing all other models in Chat GPT.

Again, no more other models. That mess

that we had there with the model

selector and thinking models,

non-thinking models and coding

specialized models, and this one is good

at psychology, and this one uses web

search. Well, no, that's all gone. GBD5,

that's all you get. And it automatically

selects between the various tools it

has. It's still it has all the tools

now. So you get uh web browsing, you get

custom instructions, you get the canvas,

you get the code interpreter. All of

that is built into one thing. If all of

those don't mean much to you, don't

worry about it. You're kind of just by

using this product, you'll kind of learn

about them. For example, the canvas is

like a word editor inside of chat GPT

and custom instructions is sort of like

giving it an extra prompt in addition to

what you're already sending it. But I

think the massive massive thing here is

and we'll get to kind of the benefits of

this whole thing for the users here but

I really want to point out I think for

people who are not extremely versed in

how to use these models this is going to

be so much more intuitive right you

don't need super long super precise

prompts to get good results out of

models like O3 previously and this just

builds on that okay this is not release

chat this is not GPT3.5 from 2022 where

it really makes a difference if your

prompt is this long or this long. Um,

and the shorter prompts are just not

going to give you the results. This

works differently. So, I think it's a

huge upgrade for free users. And that's

going to be kind of the story of this

entire video. I'm going to be kind of

pointing that out from multiple

perspectives. Yet, power users are also

happy to see this because one amazing

thing is there's no more thinking.

There's no more selection between, hey,

do I want a thinking model? Do I want a

non-thinking model? Matter of fact, this

is not even too new. If you paid close

attention inside of chat GPT over the

recent months they had this change where

even GBD40 was thinking at times it

never spent minutes thinking but it

often spent like 10 15 20 seconds

thinking. So they already implemented

this ability to automatically decide if

it should just give you an answer right

away or if it should think for 15

seconds before it gives you an answer.

Now this is fully integrated and you

don't even get a choice. It just decides

on its own if it should be thinking or

if it will just give you a quick answer.

If you ask it's a fact of like how many

people live in New York like it

shouldn't be thinking for a minute or

two. Um some of the previous models like

03 Pro that question right there would

have thought for like five minutes and

then it gave you the number that GP40

could have given you right away. So now

it's all merged into one thing. You just

get the answer with hopefully the right

thinking depth. Now let's talk

benchmarks. I pulled up the releases

from this week that matter which is uh

Entropics. These are the main two

competitors. Thropic and Google Gemini,

their benchmarks in some areas are still

better. Uh GPD5 like long story short,

GPD5 wins on most of them, but on

specific benchmarks, these other models

are still better. For for example, on AM

2025 mathematics, well, deep think

reaches 99.2. If we look at uh

competition math right here, you'll see

GBT5 with no tools is at 94. Excellent

result. But yeah, Gemini wins on that

one. Agentic tool use um anthropic wins

on one of these and loses on the other

one of them. Okay. And then there's a

few that um open didn't even include

like terminal bench which is the

terminal usage there. Um I suppose

Claude would just win otherwise they

would include it. And then there was one

more actually I pointed it out MML

which is multilingual QA. So like if you

want to do multiple languages, these

other models might be performing better

than GP5. I mean there has to be some

trade-offs, right? So they didn't even

include those. On some of the other

things, a lot of the coding benchmarks,

it just straight out wins. Okay, but

again, we're not here to talk about

benchmarks. I just wanted to highlight

that they're best on most of them now,

but not all of them. And some of these

competing models when it just comes to

benchmarks still win on some on certain

measurements. So what really matters is

how it performs in the real world. What

really matters is, hey, are you going to

be gravitating towards this product? Is

it going to be making your life better?

Is it going to be making you more

productive, freeing up more time to do

things that you actually care about

rather than maybe some data analysis or

some research and tedious tasks at the

computer? And that's what we'll try to

answer in the last segment of this video

where we look at multiple examples. But

now I want to actually talk about some

of the features and some of the things

they pointed out during the live stream.

Okay, so I have like three bullet points

right here that I want to kind of touch

on and discuss and then we'll get into

the demo part. So one of the things that

this will be doing is that it's supposed

to have way less hallucinations. I think

that's actually really exciting and

that's the type of announcement we

haven't seen out of any competing

company yet. I haven't seen Google come

out or anthropic come out or any of the

Chinese models come out with like an

announcement that hey this model

hallucinates way less. It's more

reliable. Open AI is kind of a first on

that. And when I talk to people, it's

one of the it's one of the top things

that I hear from people as a concern

about AI. Like it hallucinates a lot.

How can I trust it? I can't trust it,

right? It's just going to confidently

give me wrong facts. I still need to

like get the right facts. I can't just

like it. I don't want it to lie to me

confidently. So, it's doing better on

that. They quantified this in some

numbers. But I think this is one of the

things that only time will show. I don't

dare to kind of like judge this today

from the first results from the release.

But that's really an exciting direction

that OpenAI is taking. I hope we see

more of that. Secondly, they're saying

it's more emotionally resonant than

before, meaning it has very high EQ and

meaning it will pick up on the user's

behavior. Matter of fact, there was a

release um an announcement from this

week where they're actually including a

little box that pops up if you're

talking to chat for too long that says

like, "Hey, are you sure? Like you want

to keep chatting? It's been a while.

Maybe take a little break." And this in

combination with this announcement or

that GPD5 is supposed to be even more

emotionally resonant than before. I'm

really excited for it. One little side

note is they had this um model called

4.5. Most people didn't use it. I I

actually used it a ton. I really liked

it for all my psychological use cases

where I kind of like simulated different

scenarios or I had different smart

people discuss an idea that I was

interested in or I used it as a coach on

several like entrepreneurial decisions

on all those. The 4.5 model was the best

until Claude for Opus came out. Then I

switched to that because I really just

like the human aspect of it. The way it

sounds, the way it gives concise advice

and doesn't like overexlain. I really

like that. But 4.5 was amazing and this

is supposed to mirror those

capabilities. When they used this

language, when OpenAI used this language

for the first time, it was the 4.5

release and now they said it again,

emotionally resonant. So you can expect

that it's going to be a better friend.

It's going to be a better u human. It's

going to be a better AI. It's going to

be a better companion for humans. I

think that's the right wording right

there, isn't it? Okay. So we can expect

that and we can look at some of that in

the writing example here in a second.

But I have three more bullet points

here. One of them is um also an

interesting one that we've never seen

before. It's supposed to be less

deceptive. Meaning that when it doesn't

know the result, it's not just going to

stand there and pretend like it knows it

every single time. Sure, still going to

happen a lot and it is a big problem.

Sometimes it just doesn't know how to

get to the right answer and it just

gives it to you and it's like, "Hey,

here it is."

And then you're sitting there like,

"Okay, cool. Thank you." You work with

it. One time I pulled up a quote that I

was even using in a lecture and then

after doing some research and like

trying to find the source of the quote I

realized it completely hallucinated that

thing and it confidently presented it to

me as if it was like it made like it

used a real institute of like some

standardization and and whatever but

like the quote was made up so that

happens and now it's supposed to be

better one more thing two more things

that are supposed to be better um it's

way better at medical use cases

apparently this is something I can't

test right Now, I don't have the

expertise, but we'll put it put together

a set of test prompts and then either in

tomorrow's news you can use video or in

next week's news you can use video, our

show that we do every Friday that I do

every Friday. U me and the team research

like all the AI releases and show you

the ones that you can actually use and

then u practical applications for them.

Shout out to news you can use. You can

check that check that out. Subscribe to

the channel to check that out every

single Friday. But medical use cases

we'll be looking at there. I think you

kind of need to get a bit more nuanced

and test a bit more in depth to really

have an opinion on that. And then

lastly, um I want to point out that

actually only the pro plan is going to

have deep thinking. Now, if you're not

aware, deep thinking is like this

capability that you can enable in other

assistants or you could already enable.

I mean, Gemini literally released a

model called deep think now. So, that's

what it does by default. and Claude, you

can kind of go in here and yeah, do

extended thinking. They had this

capability already. Now only the pro

plan is going to have that. So that's a

$200 plan and it's sort of the

equivalent of previously uh 03 pro if

you're familiar with that. Also only

available on the free $100 plan, $200

plan. So that's where it like thinks for

five minutes before it gives you a

result. Probably only relevant if you're

doing maths and physics, maybe

development. I think on development it

can be actually really useful but nobody

really used OpenAI models for

development up until now. They used

Gemini or claude. This might change now

because like they made a big point out

of development being a big thing. And

those are all the kind of features you

can expect. Now two more unexpected

things that they mentioned and I think

most people overheard. So I think these

are good and then we'll get into the

practical part here, right? That most

people are probably waiting for. So

first of all they said there's going to

be GPT swift voice. So if you're not

familiar, GPTs are their chat bots

within chat GPT. You can give custom

instructions. They can do actions.

Matter of fact, in our community, we've

been building interesting things with

GPT since the day of release. And even

now, we're doing things where like you

can daily journal with the GPT and then

it saves it to your own note takingaking

app or database and then you can pull in

like previous notes and like work with

them. You can do really cool things with

GPT. GPTs, that's just one example.

They're getting voice mode. So if you

want if you have a daily journaling

voice node uh GPT that is going to be

saving uh your journal entries to your

very own database your very own notion

for example or whatever you might be

using now you can just turn on voice

mode and like talk to it. You can just

blabber as I am right now. You can kind

of just do that. For me and many others

that is the most natural interface. Um

one thing about talking that I love is

you can talk faster than you can type

even if you're a fast typer. And a lot

of times when I type, I feel like my

thoughts get ahead of my uh ability to

type. So talking is huge. And with GPTs,

we're going to have GPD5, the

connectivity, and we're going to have

the voice mode, which is amazing. I

think this is really going to like

revive GPTs a bit. I hope. I love GPS. I

still use them. They're so useful. And

talking about connectivity, this is my

very last unexpected point that some

people might have missed. Somewhere in

the middle of the presentation, they

just quickly mentioned this. They're

gonna have calendar and Gmail connectors

in GPT5.

So, you're gonna have a true personal

assistant where you connect it to your

calendar and your emails and you're

going to be able to check in in the

morning. Maybe set up a custom GPT and

just ask, "Hey, what's up? What are we

doing today?" And it just gives you the

rundown autonomously right there inside

of Chat GPT. Um, for anybody thinking

right now, for for any power user

thinking, um, I'm going to go over it's

not shipped in my uh in here, we're

going to be using it through the API.

But for anybody thinking, hey, Eigor,

don't we already have those connectors?

Yeah, we do for deep research and the

agent, but not for chat GPT. If I look

at connectors right here, uh, where is

it? Data controls connectors. You can

see Gmail is connected, but it's only

available for deep research and agent

mode. next week. So that is like mid

August. It's going to be shipping to all

plans including um well it's going to be

shipping to the pro and the plus plan,

not to the free plan. So if you're

paying $20 a month, you're going to get

to connect this to your calendar, to

your emails, and use some of its

capabilities.

But now let's finally try it. Let's give

it a shot. Few things I want to try

here. Okay, first of all, I always

really care about the writing style of

these things. I I feel like if the model

sounds bad, I'm going to be using it way

less just because so much of what I do

is related to writing. And even when I

just read the results and they just

sound like crap, I don't like it. That's

why I was or like I am a big Claude fan

because it just sounds human. It sounds

natural. It keeps things concise. I like

that. With GPT, I really liked 4.5. I

liked 03 for its web search. But yeah,

let's just give this a shot and have a

look at a basic writing prompt that I

just ran right in here. Um, I always use

this one. If you follow the channel for

a while, you might notice already. Write

me an email to my boss about the broken

coffee machine in our office. And then I

just ran this in here and I'm going to

put these up side by side. I'm going to

have the Clawed Opus 4.1 result that

released a few days ago. And I'm going

to have the GPT5 result here on the

left. And this is going to be my very

first look at the writing style. So

exciting to see how this actually

performs. Okay, so let's start by just

reading this broken coffee machine in

the office is the subject. And again,

this is just one example. Please make up

your own mind. I am going to give my

opinion because that's why I'm here. No.

Hi, boss's name. I wanted to let you

know that the coffee machine in our

office is currently not working. It

seems to have brief briefly described

the problem if you know it. Um, could we

look into getting it repaired or

replaced? Please let me know if you'd

like me to contact maintenance or the

supplier to arrange a fix. So, first of

all, I really like how concise it is. I

really like that there's no not a lot of

EM dashes in this. I like the um it gave

me a variable here though, which I don't

know if I'm a huge fan of actually. I

am. I think AI writing should be a bit

more. It should be AI plus human. Most

people that just copy pasted GPD4

outputs straight to jail with those.

Jesus. Like nobody wants to read your

generic like email on like oh let's dive

into the problem matter or like here are

three bullet points describing the like

I don't want to hear none of that. This

is actually good. I'm a fan of it. I'm a

fan of it. I had to think for a second

but I actually like that it's including

variables now. Um this sounds super

natural and yeah otherwise super

concise. I like it a lot. Let's look at

claude here to compare because this was

my go-to before GB5. Let's see. Coffee

machine repair needed break room. Okay.

So it just makes things up which is

fine. like it often um like that can be

useful. I think practically dayto-day

this might be more useful. Let's see. I

wanted to bring to your attention that

the coffee machine in the break room has

stopped working. It appears to have

malfunctioned this morning and is no

longer brewing coffee or dispensing hot

water. So, it's making a bunch bunch of

assumptions here. Yeah. Since many of

our team members rely on the coffee

machine throughout the day, this is

affecting productivity and morale. Okay.

Reasoning. I like that. Several

colleagues have mentioned having to

leave the office to get coffee, which

takes time away from their work. Okay,

look. So, like at this point, I'm kind

of like I'm a big fan of the fact that

there's a variable here to actually fill

in the things that GPT doesn't know from

the concept. And here it's just making

it up. Maybe maybe let me run it one

more time and see if if it does that

every time to give it a fair shot. But I

think as is, I just prefer GP5's result

here, especially with the variable. It's

just going to make the internet a better

place honestly because people will have

to think a little more. Okay, let's see.

I wanted to bring to your attention that

the coffee machine in location. Ah, so

here it's doing the same thing. So I

suppose yeah, so here it's doing the

same thing that I was a fan of. Okay, so

I guess it just depends on your luck of

the draw. Here's the optional

description. Let's see how it rounds it

out. The human factor. Please let me

know if you need any additional

information or if there's anything I can

do to help resolve this.

Yeah. So I think this is identical. This

is very identical. So on this I would

say the first one GP5 was clearly

better. Now I feel like it's just a tie.

So let's let me try one more. Um let me

try one more chat prompt here with GPT5.

Uh the chat model.

So I want to see if it does the

bracketing thing again or how this

performs. So on the second try it also

did the bracket. So I think this is a

huge upgrade. We're just going to enjoy

reading uh Twitter and LinkedIn and

everything on the internet more because

people are going to have to actually

write stuff themselves from here on out

rather than GPD40 like writing it in

that horrible robotic style every time.

Yeah, I like this a lot. So, writing

first test I would say passed equally as

good as Claude at the very least if not

better. I think it's kind of on par. I'm

really happy about this for the entirety

of the internet. Seriously, like this is

great. Okay, so that's one thing that I

wanted to test. Secondly, let's do idea

generation. Okay, to prompt this, I

write a weekly AI newsletter for 70,000

subscribers where I cover the latest in

generative AI tools and apps and

prompts. By the way, if you care link in

the description, haha, little call to

action. Generative five, generate five

distinct, varied, unique, and

interesting articles, article ideas that

blend emerging AI trends with actionable

use cases for creators and businesses.

And then I want a specific format for

each one of them. So I want a title in

quotes, a two sentence description of

the concept and its subscriber value and

at least one AI tool or new source to

feature. Okay, we're going to run this.

So basically five article ideas and then

some uh specific set of formatting.

Let's see how that does. And then I'm

going to run the same thing in cloud and

we're going to compare.

Okay, hope you're enjoying the video so

far. If you are, maybe take a second to

leave a like. Um that really helps out

the channel. But now let's compare some

of these ideas. I'm just going to give

you kind of my judgment as a content

creator in this space that you know does

this for a living and spends a lot of

time with the tools. Let's see how good

these ideas are from my perspective. So

from inspiration to income, how AI is

redefining creativity as a service. Um

subscriber value readers will learn

practical strategies to monetize AI

content at scale while protecting their

brand and IP. Okay. Using midjourney

opens GPT.

That's decent. That's decent. What else

is What else do we have? The rise of

microAI. Why small models could

outperform the giants for your business.

Okay. GPT4 and Claude make headlines.

Micro models can be trained for niche

tasks. Eh, it's okay. Problematic setup.

Problematic setup. Like, okay. Okay. Not

bad. Not bad. Um, I'll give this one

like a three stars. This one is maybe

like 3.5 stars maybe out of five.

Something like that. prototype using AI

to build and test products in days, not

months. Oh, that's actually good.

Complete mockups. Yeah, this one is

really good. Figma's AI features.

Galileo AI for not familiar. Runway for

visual prototypes. Okay, that's good. I

was thinking this was going to go more

like builder. So, these are solid ideas.

Um, I wouldn't say best I've ever heard,

but pretty good. Deep fake ads and

synthetic spokes people. This is really

good. This is I'll give this one like a

four stars. AI as your second brain

building knowledge bases that learn with

you. This is fantastic and maybe 4.5

stars just based off the title. Check

custom GPTs and vector databases. Well,

but like you can't really combine a

custom GP with a vector DB.

Okay. So, this is just like

hallucinating it. So, although it's

supposed to do that less. Yeah. Okay.

So, not bad. Let's see here. Rise of AI

voice agents.

I'm just going to kind of like brush

over this. I've run this prompt many

times in here.

I would say generally my feeling is

telling me Claude is a bit better at

this. It's just a bit better.

Just these these I don't know. You tell

me. But these titles, they just sound a

bit more clickable, a bit more

interesting, and I think it's even more

relevant. So, but it re it's really

good. I got to give it its prompts uh

props. It's really good at adhering to

the prompt. So, when you tell it

something, it's actually going to do it.

That's not the case with all models, by

the way. body spin around the block like

often you tell it like hey I want one

two three things and it's like okay I'm

going give you number one on the first

one and then forget about the others for

the rest and like it's a mess so prompt

adherence seems to be really good here I

like it the quality of the ideas

eh I don't know I'm a huge fan of claw

for ideas I think it's really good at

that um first impression of this it's

okay it's it's good um but I think the

one that many people want to see is how

does it demo with the games and how does

a demo with the physics simulations. It

looked really impressive in their

presentation. But mind you, that

presentation was crafted by one of the

biggest AI companies in the world and

they had they have hundreds if not

thousands of testers and prompters and

and they have access to the user data

and they have some of the best examples

in the world. That's my point. So what

really matters is how it performs for

your stuff, okay? And how it performs in

practice. Nevertheless, that being said,

this damn example with the castle.

Amazing. So, this is what it looked like

in their example. I ran the identical

prompt and this is what we got. I I

think you can kind of like play it and

you can pop the balloon. So, this works.

It's just graphically the other one is a

bit better with the environment and

stuff. I think they did pick an example

that it would be exceptional at, but

nevertheless, it's clearly better than

Claude here. Where are the characters?

Are they like inside of the castle? And

I can't see them. Oh, I think it placed

them like inside, but that's not really

Well, how do I I think these are the

characters. Ah, yeah, that's the noble.

But yeah, that's not amazing apparently.

So, yeah. So, GBD5 does better on this.

So, look, across the board, conclusion

time. Okay, what does this mean for free

users? What does this mean for power

users? For free users, this is

unbelievable. Like, people are going to

go from, you know, like the stone age.

They only had GPT40 which is like over

here. Okay, GPT40. GPT40

and power users with paid plans using

this on a daily they were already using

um 03 which is you know at its base like

way better but then it could search the

internet. So in some cases it was like

way better. Okay. And now GPT5 is just

just kind of did this thing. It's a

slight upgrade to 03 and all that stuff

and it makes it simpler to use. But that

combination of ease of use, it's a

fantastic illustration. No, that

combination of ease of use and its

ability to actually um perform better as

the base model and all the tools

integrated. By the way, I have to I have

to move the camera so you can see this

full thing. Make it a gamecher for free

users. Okay, GBD40 to be fair was still

pretty good, but not as good as 03. When

you have technical difficulties and it

just went into the web and thought for a

minute and found like 20 articles and

then gave you the exact response, it

feels like magic. Of felt like magic.

Claude feels like magic. Gemini feels

like magic. GBT4 did not feel like

magic. This is better than all the

competitors and it's simpler to use. So

I think for free users, complete game

changer. Please show your relatives, get

them on this on the train of of people

using this. I mean, we have 700 million

weekly active users in Chat Chipd

and now they're transitioning to this

insane. Now, for people who follow this

channel weekly, for people who use AI

daily, for people who geek out over this

stuff, this is an incremental

improvement that is very welcome. I love

that there's no more model selector. I

love that it's it looks really solid in

coding, and only time will show how good

it really is. I'll be reporting back on

use cases tomorrow and next week and the

week after like heck this is going to be

my new daily driver for now. Let's see

how that goes. I think for development

tasks where you use something like

claude code and you really go into the

deep end of the pool and you use five

agents with multiple MCPs at the same

time to build things. I think there like

claude is still king just because that

damn app works so well. But for everyday

just codewriting this might be the best

for creating quick apps. this might be

the best for helping you with writing

and everyday tasks. This is probably the

best and everybody can use it on the

free plan. So, this is going to drive

adoption. This is going to make it

easier for every single one of your

family members to actually use it. This

is going to show people what AI can

really do in 2025 rather than showing

them a little glimpse without all the

tooling and all the stuff that makes it

powerful. I think I personally think

this is a pivotal moment for AI because

the free users are going to be like

what? This is possible. You guys were

doing this all along. Or maybe they're

not even going to say that because

they're not aware. But models before

they were insane. Most people didn't

know that. Those 700 million weekly

active users, most of them, they have no

idea what the deep end of the pool looks

like. They're about to find out. For

everybody else, fantastic upgrade. Let

me know what you think though in the

comment section below. It's pretty much

everything I have for today. It's a good

little discussion. Go ahead and try it

out. Should be available. I'll put all

the links I used um in the description

below. and I will see you very