Early Tertiary Subsidence and Sedimentary Fades-Northern
Early Tertiary Subsidence and Sedimentary Fades-Northern
39
Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/aapg/aapgbull/article-pdf/69/1/39/4690022/aapg_1985_0069_0001_0039.pdf
by Turkish Petroleum Corporation user
40 Northern Sirte Basin, Libya
SCN 20*E
ZELTEN
PLATFORM
Figure 2—Map showing major structural features and location of wells used in malcing cross sections. Study area shown on Figure 1.
Sections AA', BB', and CC' refer to cross sections in Figures 3,4, and 5, respectively.
I
O
c
3
su
0)
3
Q.
3
X
fi>
(D
(A
Figure 3—East-west (AA') stratigraphic cross section tlirougli soutliern wells, with structural features shown. Datum is top of Facha Dolomite. See Figure 2 for line of section.
FEET Mer^RS
VERTICAL SCALE
o
3.
n
3
V)
5.'
o
D3
01
(fl.
5'
•<
Figure 4—East-west (BB') stratigraphic cross section tlirough central wells, with structural features shown. Datum is top of Facha Dolomite. See Figure 2 for line of section.
m ZELTEN LS m
UPPER S A T A L FM
^:
r LOWER SATAL FM
IPPER CRETACEOUS
4OO0l
I
a
c
3
Q>
0)
3
19 2Q 25
EAST Q.
FFt-«
DATUM TO*> OF MARASH FM
- Marada Trough -
-i m 3
T;
0)
3
(B
(A
K A L A S H LS
Figure 5—East-west (CC') stratigraphic cross section through northern wells, with structural features shown. Datum is top of Harash Formation. See Figure 2 for line of section.
CRETACEOUS-TERTIARY BOUNDARY
In the subsurface of the basin, Maastrichtian and
Danian sediments are well developed. The contact of these
units is exposed only along the western border of the basin
with the Hon graben (Jordi and Lonfat, 1963; Barr and
Weegar, 1972). In the study area, the Cretaceous-Paleo-
cene boundary lies between the Kalash Limestone and its
equivalent and the Hagfa Shale and its equivalent (Figures
3-5). Although microfossils from the Maastrichtian
Kalash Limestone suggest a shallow water environment of
deposition at the close of the Cretaceous, there is no break
in deposition (Barr and Berggren, 1981).
In the deeper parts of the area (Zella and Marada
troughs), no evidence exists for interruption of deposition
at the close of the Maastrichtian. However, an abrupt
change in depositional setting is evident. These changes in
the depositional environment are the resuh of shallowing
of Maastrichtian seas, bringing the Cretaceous Period to a
close followed by the deepening which marks the onset of
the Paleocene cycle (Barr and Weegar, 1972).
The Paleocene section conformably overlies Maastrich-
tian sediments over most of the area (Figures 3-5), but it
unconformably overlies Cambrian-Ordovician rocks on
the Amin high (HH2-47, Figure 3). These Paleocene strata
are in turn conformably overlain by rocks of the lower
Eocene (Gir Formation).
DISCUSSION
Three cross sections illustrate the facies relationships
(Figure 2). Section AA' (Figure 3), trending east-north- Figure 6—Generalized columnar section showing general lithol-
eastward, crosses the southern part of the area at high ogy and stratigraphy in area (after Barr and Weegar, 1972).
100 kn
50 n
CI. = 100'
Figure 7—Isopach map of Maastrichtian (Kalash Limestone and its equivalent) based on well logs, showing thiclcness of carbonate
fades. No sediment decompaction correction has been applied. Contour interval is 100 ft (30 m).
angle to strike. The section shows the relationship between tion. The lack of a detrital apron around the high, how-
the sediments of the Zehen platform, Marada trough, ever, indicates that the area was not a strongly emergent
Beda platform, Amin high, Kotla graben, Dahra plat- feature.
form, and Zella trough. In this section the Amin high is the Section BB' (Figure 4) north of section AA' illustrates
dominant structural element. The fault blocks are tilted, the relationship between the sedimentary patterns and
with an unconformity between the Cambrian-Ordovician structural features of the central part of the study area. It
and Paleocene in HH2-47 and between Upper Cretaceous crosses the Zella trough, Dahra platform, and Marada
and Cambrian-Ordovician in BBl-47. To the west and east trough. The Precambrian basement has the greatest uplift
of the Amin high, a series of normal step faults is present. on the eastern margin of the Zella trough (BBBl-11). The
Major faults exist between HH2-47 and CC1 -13 to the east basement control in the area is sufficient to delineate a
and HH2-47 and BBl-47 to the west. The thickness of the series of blocks that are do wnthro wn to the west of the sec-
Paleocene section increases abruptly to the east of the tion. The lowest block is situated in the center of the Zella
Amin high, which suggests rapid subsidence caused by the graben (Figure 4). The section also displays thickening of
reactivation of the faults at the time of deposition. To the Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene rocks in the Marada and
west of the Amin high, the thickness remains relatively Zella troughs.
constant, suggesting that, at this time, the faults were inac- The fairly constant thickness of the Paleocene sequence
tive or nearly so. The absence of Maastrichtian and over the platform area indicates gentle subsidence and low
Danian rocks on the present Amin high suggests that the sedimentation rates, in contrast to nondeposition over the
area was uplifted during the latest Cretaceous and early Amin high. Several wells penetrate a considerable thick-
Paleocene, with resultant subaerial erosion or nondeposi- ness of the Cambrian-Ordovician (Gargaf Group or
100 krr
5 0 mi
Figure 8—Lithofacies map of lower Paleocene sediments, showing location of carbonate platforms surrounded by shales.
Hofra Formation), and one of them bottoms in the Pre- Paleocene time opened with a new phase of crustal exten-
cambrian basement (BBBl-11). The basement uplift sion beneath the Sirte basin. Transgressive Paleocene seas
revealed by this well is strong evidence for the pre-Late covered the entire basin (Barr and Berggren, 1981). As a
Cretaceous tectonic movements. result, a thick section of marine sediments was deposited
Section CC' (Figure 5) in the northern part of the study in the newly subsided troughs (e.g., Marada trough).
area, crosses the Zella trough, Dahra platform, and Shale deposits were generally confined to low-energy
Marada trough. The eastern part of the region is deformed zones in the trough and blanketed much of the
by a series of step faults that are located between wells II- area during the transgressive cycle. Carbonates were
20, Al-94, and II1-6 (Figure 5). The Paleocene sedimen- deposited on the shelf margins with their facies controlled
tary section reaches a maximum thickness of about 4,000 by water depth, topography, and currents.
ft (1,219 m) in the Marada trough and becomes more After the first Paleocene transgression and an early
shaly.
influx of fine clastic material, the sedimentary pattern
became a more regular arrangement of lime buildups,
reefs, and shale lenses. The Zelten platform was the depo-
sitional site of mainly shales and lime mud, whereas car-
bonate buildups occurred on the Amin high and Beda
PALEOCENE HISTORY platform. The Dahra platform developed in a similar
The shallowing of the Maastrichtian sea was accompa- fashion and is surrounded by a lower Paleocene shale
nied by deposition of the Kalash Limestone over much of facies (Figure 8).
the basin, including inferred troughs and grabens. This In the Zelten region (outside of the study area) pinnacle
stratigraphic unit marks the end of the Cretaceous Period. reefs grew (Terry and Williams, 1969). Farther south, the
100 km
-I 1
5 0 mi
0.1. = 100'
Figure 9—Isopach map of Paleocene shales, showing local subsidence and high shale thickness in grabens. Contour interval is 100 ft.
No sediment decompaction correction has been applied. Dots show location of wells used in making map.
Defa high was the site of reefy limestone and dolomite An abrupt change in thickness and the lateral facies var-
deposition, possibly owing to the lack of sufficient clastic iation from shales to carbonates westward from the
material. Marada graben to the Dahra platform (Figures 3-5) indi-
Toward the close of the early Paleocene, basin growth cates that this area was the Paleocene shelf margin; it also
apparently slowed and a regional disturbance caused by suggests block faulting down to the east (Figure 2). These
fauh reactivation altered the patterns of deposition over facies changes represent a local variation in depositional
large parts of the basin. The pinnacle reefs in the Zelten setting across the platform margin. To the east and west of
area expanded over the muddy fades. Shale deposition the Marada trough the Paleocene section changes laterally
continued only in the northernmost part of the Sirte basin, to a predominantly shelf carbonate facies—Satal carbon-
and became highly calcareous. The rest of the basin was ate on the Dahra platform to the west and Sabil carbon-
covered by chalk-limestone deposit. ates on the Zeiten platform to the east (Barr and Weegar,
During the late Paleocene, the eastern shelf or lime plat- 1972). In the study area to the south and southwest, the
form continued to expand with only slight variations. In Paleocene sediments consist of a lower shale umt, middle
deep troughs (e.g., Marada, Figures 2 and 9), mud contin- limestone, and an upper shale sequence (Conley, 1971).
ued to accumulate at reduced rates. A basal limy section The sequence becomes more marly and dolomitic south-
(Zelten Limestone) was deposited over much of the basin, ward. Local sandstone facies were deposited on the pro-
indicating that an environment favorable to reef develop- jected southern shoreline during the early Paleocene
ment existed where water depth and subsidence rates did (Lehmann, 1964).
not interfere with the reef growth. The best setting for pin- In general, the sequence thickens in the troughs and
nacle reef development occurred on the Zelten platform thins over the platforms (Figure 10). The thickness of the
(Terry and Williams, 1969). Paleocene section in the study area ranges from 2,000 ft
C.I. = 500'
Figure 10—Isopach map of Paleocene sedimentary fades (shales and carbonates), showing high subsidence and sedimentation rates
in troughs during the Paleocene. No sediment decompaction correction has been applied. Contour interval is 500 ft. Dots show loca-
tion of wells used in making map.
(609 m) on the Dahra platform to 3,500 ft (1,066 m) in the process, does not change the general shape of the subsi-
Zella trough and 4,000 ft (1,219 m) in the Marada trough. dence curves.
The reference horizon for the construction of the subsi-
BASIN SUBSIDENCE dence curves is the regional unconformity separating the
Precambrian basement, Cambrian-Ordovician Gargaf
In an attempt to develop a quantitative approach, basin Group, or Lower Cretaceous Nubian sandstone from the
history subsidence curves (Figures 11-13) have been calcu- Upper Cretaceous and Tertiary marine section.
lated for the wells used to construct the cross sections. The subsidence curves over the whole area are remark-
These subsidence curves were constructed using the back- ably consistent (Figures 11 -13). The curves (Figures 11 and
stripping technique of Steckler and Watts (1978) and sub- 12) show that subsidence was slow during approximately
surface stratigraphic data obtained from the boreholes. the first 25 m.y. (Coniacian through Santonian). A sudden
Deep wells that penetrated the Precambrian basement or small pulse of increased subsidence and rapid sedimenta-
Cambrian-Ordovician Gargaf Group or Hofra Formation tion, coinciding with the deposition of the Campanian
were selected to encompass the entire subsidence history of shales, was abruptly terminated as shown by a sudden flat-
the basin. tening of the subsidence curves, indicating almost no sub-
The time scale used for these curves is based on biostrat- sidence during the Maastrichtian. A strikingly greater
igraphic data and therefore is approximate. The decom- subsidence rate characterizes the following 27 m.y. (Paleo-
paction correction of Sclater and Christie (1980) has not cene and Eocene), and rapid sedimentation was contem-
been used because this correction, though changing the poraneous with the basin subsidence. These events were
thickness of the stratigraphic units in the back-stripping followed by a moderate rate of subsidence that character-
^ HH2-47
^ x \
Figure 11—Subsidence curves for wells on section AA' (without correction for compaction), Sirte basin. Following initial slow rate of
subsidence from l\ironian to Santonian, markedly smaller event during Campanian is followed by virtual termination of subsidence
during Maastrichtian. Accelerated rate of subsidence followed from Paleocene to Eocene.
izes the major part of the basin subsidence curves. In the during Paleocene and Eocene times. This slow rate sug-
southern part of the area (Figure 11), the subsidence curve gests that this horst block (the Amin high) was not affected
of the well HH2-47 shows a very slow rate of subsidence by the early Tertiary regional subsidence.
Figure 12—Subsidence curves for wells on section BB' (without correction for compaction), Sirte basin. Curves show low subsidence
rate during 'Hironian and high subsidence rate during Campanian. Subsidence was terminated during Maastrichtian, followed by an
accelerated rate of subsidence during Paleocene and Eocene. Subsidence was terminated again during Oligocene and Miocene.
\
* - < -
Figure 13—Subsidence curves for wells on section C C (without correction for compaction), Sirte basin. In contrast to section in
Figure 12, curves show high subsidence rates during Maastrichtian, and accelerated rate of subsidence during Paleocene and Eocene,
followed by reduced subsidence rate during Oligocene and Miocene.
The north part of the study area (Figure 13) shows no geometry at depth (Wernicke and Burchfiel, 1982). How-
record of basin subsidence before the Maastrichtian, pos- ever, there is insufficient seismic data to determine if these
sibly resulting from erosion or nondeposition. The curves faults are listric at depth.
in this figure show higher rates of subsidence during the
Maastrichtian than those in Figures 11 and 12. The higher
rates suggest that the northern part of the basin was more SUMMARY
active at the close of the Cretaceous. The Maastrichtian
subsidence was followed by even greater subsidence rates Sediments in the Sirte basin consist of lower Paleozoic
during the Paleocene and Eocene. In this part of the area clastic sediments (Gargaf Group or Hofra Formation),
there is no record for the post-Eocene subsidence because upper Mesozoic Nubian sandstone, and Upper Cretaceous
the stratigraphic section is missing. and Tertiary marine deposits. The Paleocene facies are
dominantly shales in the grabens and carbonates on the
Additional support for the basin subsidence history dis- platforms and highs, and intercalated shales and carbon-
cussed above is provided by a plot of basin subsidence rate ates on the platform margins.
(m/m.y.) as a function of time (Figure 14), a method devel-
The major structural features that have affected the sed-
oped by Parsons and Sclater (1977) and Steckler and Watts
imentation pattern in the study area include four north-
(1978). Correlation of the subsidence rate curves and sub-
west-southeast-trending structures: the Zella trough and
sidence curves show some consistency in the general pat-
Haleigh High to the west, the Dahra platform in the cen-
tern of subsidence. This method shows that, in the Sirte
tral part of the area, and the Marada graben to the east.
basin, the highest subsidence rate occurred during the
North-northeast-trending structures in the region are the
Paleocene and Eocene, which suggests that the major tec-
Kotla graben, the Amin high, and the Beda platform, all
tonic evolution of the Sirte basin occurred during the early
in the southeastern part of the study area. All platforms in
Tertiary and not during the early-Late Cretaceous.
the region are covered by limestone and remained rela-
tively stable during the early Paleocene. However, the
shale-filled troughs continued to subside and deepen to the
FAULTING north. Renewed regional subsidence and an increase in the
Most of the faults cutting the Mesozoic and Tertiary rate of terrigenous supply brought about renewed shale
rocks are normal faults, with offsets up to 1,000 ft (305 deposition over most of the shelf area during the middle
m). In the shale basins and the lime platforms or the blocks Paleocene. However the areal extent of the shale facies
formed by basement highs, it is possible that some of the was less than that during the early Paleocene. The main
major faults may be listric and related to compaction in facies variation occurs across the platform-basin margins.
the adjacent shale-filled grabens. It has been suggested The Paleocene section reaches its maximum thickness
that differential tilt between fault blocks indicates a listric 3,900 ft (1,189 m) in the Marada trough (Figure 9). The
^
UJ
o
z
lU
Q 100- 100-
en
CD
Z)
V)
u.
o
liJ
<
WELL
200- 200-
FFFi-ll
1 1 1 —— 1 — — 1 1 1 — 1 1 1 —
so too
TIME (M. Y.) -I 1 1 1 r
SO lOO
TIME (MY.)
1
o 1
z
UJ
Q
W
CO
3 100- 100-
cn
u.
o WELL
UJ
f- Y,-I3
<
a:
1 1 1 1 1 — 1 1
so 100 so too
TIME (M.Y.) TIME (M.Y)
Figure 14—Subsidence rate as function of time (m/m.y), without decompaction correction. Based on borehole data in area.
lower Paleocene carbonate platforms are in the Defa and ward extension of carbonates resuhed in eventual blanket-
Dahra areas (Figure 8). The Paleocene fades changes ing of nearly the entire Sirte basin by the Zelten
from widespread deposition of shale in the troughs to shal- Limestone. The subsidence curves and the subsidence rate
low-shelf carbonates on the platforms may result from curves for the Sirte Basin indicate that the highest subsi-
change in the sediment supply, reactivation of faults, or dence and sedimentation rates occurred during the Paleo-
rapid subsidence. The combined effect of these factors cene and Eocene.
was to provide a clear, well-aerated, shallow water envi-
ronment in which marine shelf carbonates were deposited. REFERENCES CITED
Progradation of carbonate fades over shale fades in the
Barr, F. T, and W. A. Berggren, 1981, Lower Tertiary biostratigraphy and
troughs continued during the late Paleocene. This basin- tectonics of northeastern Libya, in M. J. Salem and M. T. Busrewil,
eds., Geology of Libya: Tripoli, Libya, Al-Fateh Univ., V. l,p, 163-191. basin, Libya: 22nd International Geological Congress [India] Pro-
- and A. A. Weegar, 1972, Stratigraphic nomenclature of the Sirte ceedings, sec. 3, pt. 3,p. 56-73.
basin, Libya: Petroleum Exploration Society of Libya, 179 p. Parsons, B., and J. G. Sclater, 1977, An analysis of the variation of ocean
Bhattacharyya, D. P., and J. C. Lorenz, 1983, Different depositional set- floor bathymetry and heat flow with age: Journal of Geophysical
tings of the Nubian lithofacies in Libya and southern Egypt: Special Research, v. 82, p. 803-827.
Publications of the International Association of Sedimentologists, v. Pomeyrol, R., 1968, "Nubian sandstone": AAPG Bulletin, v. 52, p. 589-600.
6, p. 435-448. Roberts, J. M., 1970, Amal field, Libya, in Geology of giant petroleum
Burke, K., and J. Dewey, 1974, Two plates in Africa during the Creta- fields: AAPG Memoir 14, p. 438-448.
ceous?: Nature, v. 249, p. 313-316. Russegger, J., 1837, Kreide und Sandstein: Einfluss von Granit auf Letz-
Conant, L. C , and G. H. Goudarzi, 1967, Stratigraphic and tectonic teren: Neus Jahrbuch fiir Mineralogie, p. 665-669.
framework of Libya: AAPG Bulletin, v. 51, p. 719-730. Sclater, J. D., and P. Christie, 1980, Continental stretching—an explana-
Conley, C. D., 1971, Stratigraphy and lithofacies of lower Paleocene tion of the post-mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the central North Sea
rocks, Sirte basin, Libya, in C. Gray, ed.. Symposium on the geology basin: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 85, p. 3711-3739.
of Libya: Faculty of Science, University of Libya, Tripoli, Libya, p. Selley R. C., 1968, Facies profile and other new methods of graphic data pre-
127-140. sentation, application in quantitative study of Libyan Tertiary shoreline
Goudarzi, G. H., 1981, Structure-Libya, in M. J. Salem and M. T Busre- deposits: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 38, p. 353-372.
wil, eds.. Geology of Libya: Tripoli, Libya, Al-Fateh University, v. 3, Sleekier, M. S., and A. B. Watts, 1978, Subsidence of the Adantic type
p. 879-892. continental margin off New York: Earth and Planetary Science Let-
Gumati, Y. D., 1982, Paleocene facies of the Sirte basin and structural ters, v. 41, p. 1-13.
evolution of the basin during Paleocene time: Master's thesis. Univer- Terry, R. C , and J. J. Williams, 1969, The Intisar "A" bioherm and oil
sity of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, 55 p, field, Sirte basin, Libya—its commercial development, regional
Hea, J. P., 1971, Petrography of the Paleozoic-Mesozoic sandstone of the Paleocene geologic setting and stratigraphy (reprinted from The
southern Sirte basin, Libya, in C. Gray, ed., Symposium on the geol- Exploration for Petroleum in Europe and North Africa): The Insti-
ogy of Libya: Faculty of Science, University of Libya, Tripoli, Libya, tute of Petroleum, Great Britain, p. 31-48.
p. 107-125. Van Houten, E B., 1980, Latest Jurassic-Early Cretaceous regressive
Jordi, H. A., and F. Lonfat, 1963, Stratigraphy, subdivision, and prob- facies, northeast Africa craton: AAPG Bulletin, v. 64, p. 857-867.
lems In Upper Cretaceous-lower Tertiary deposits in NW Libya: Pro- 1983, Sirte basin, north-central Libya: Cretaceous rifting above a
ceedings, First Saharan Symposium, Tripoli, Revue de L'Institut fixed mantle hotspot?: Geology, v. 11, p. 115-118.
FrancaisduP'etrole, v. 18, nos. 10 and 11, p. 112-114. Wernicke, B., and B.C. Burchfiel ,1982, Modes of extensional tectonics:
Lehmann, E. P., 1964, Tertiary-Cretaceous boundary facies in the Sirte Journal of Structural Geology, v. 4, p. 105-115.