Diploma in Contract Management

Contract Law and Capacities of Parties

 Introduction

Contract law is a cornerstone of legal systems around the world. It provides a framework for
individuals and entities to form agreements that are enforceable by law. Contracts are essential for
establishing rights, duties, and obligations between parties, and they help in ensuring predictability
and fairness in business and personal transactions.

Key Points of Contract Law and Capacity:

1. Essentials of a Contract:
o Offer: One party makes a proposal to do something or refrain from doing something.
o Acceptance: The other party agrees to the offer.
o Consideration: Something of value is exchanged between the parties (this could be
money, goods, services, etc.).
o Intention to Create Legal Relations: Both parties must intend that the agreement
has legal consequences.
o Legality: The contract must be for a lawful purpose.
2. Capacity to Contract: Capacity is the legal ability of a person to enter into a contract. If a
party lacks capacity, the contract may be voidable or even void, depending on the
circumstances. The law provides specific rules about who has the capacity to contract, which
vary slightly by jurisdiction. Generally, the following categories are important:
o Minors: People under a certain age (often 18) generally lack full capacity to contract,
although there are exceptions, such as contracts for necessities (food, clothing, etc.)
or in some jurisdictions, contracts made after a minor reaches a certain age or
reaches maturity.
o Mental Incompetence: A person who is mentally incapacitated (due to a condition
like insanity or severe mental illness) may not have the capacity to enter into a
contract. The law requires that individuals understand the nature and consequences
of their actions when they enter into a contract. Contracts entered into by mentally
incompetent individuals can often be voided, though contracts for necessities may
still be enforceable.
o Intoxication: Contracts entered into by a person who is intoxicated may also be
voidable if they can prove they were unable to understand the nature of the
transaction due to intoxication.
o Corporations and Entities: Legal entities like corporations or partnerships can
generally contract, but they must do so in accordance with their specific governing
rules and within their legal powers (i.e., within the scope of their business or articles
of incorporation).
3. Public Policy and Contractual Capacity: The requirement of capacity is meant to protect
vulnerable individuals from entering into contracts that they might not fully understand or
that might be exploitative. Public policy considerations often come into play, ensuring that
there is a balance between individual autonomy and protection from harm.

Why Is Capacity Important?

Without proper capacity, a contract might be unenforceable. Understanding the concept of capacity
is essential because it prevents parties from entering into agreements that could harm them or that
they might not fully understand. Moreover, the law seeks to protect people who are unable to

1|Pag e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

protect themselves due to age, mental state, or intoxication, ensuring fairness in contractual
relationships.

1. Minors and Their Capacity to Contract

In many jurisdictions, individuals under the age of 18 (often referred to as "minors") are considered
to lack full legal capacity to enter into contracts. This is because minors are presumed not to fully
understand the consequences of their actions, making them more vulnerable to exploitation.

Key Points:

 Voidable Contracts: Contracts entered into by minors are typically voidable at the minor’s
discretion. This means that the minor can choose to either enforce the contract or disaffirm
(void) it. The idea is to protect minors from being bound to agreements they may not fully
comprehend.
 Necessities Exception: A minor can usually be held responsible for contracts involving
essential goods or services, such as food, clothing, medical care, or housing. These are
known as "necessities," and the minor can’t disaffirm these contracts simply because of their
age.
 Ratification Upon Reaching Majority: When a minor reaches the age of majority (typically
18), they may choose to ratify the contract they entered into when they were a minor. If
they do so, the contract becomes legally binding as if they had entered it as an adult.
 Contracts for Employment: Minors can generally enter into contracts for employment or
services, but in some jurisdictions, such contracts may be subject to additional legal
protections for the minor, such as restrictions on hours worked or types of work that can be
performed.

Example:

A 16-year-old buys a car from a dealership. If the 16-year-old regrets the purchase, they can
disaffirm the contract and return the car. However, if the car was essential (say, for their commute
to school) and provided at a reasonable price, it could potentially be considered a necessity.

2. Mental Incapacity and Contracts

Mental capacity is a key factor in determining whether a person can validly enter into a contract. If a
person is mentally incapacitated, they may not fully understand the nature or consequences of their
actions when entering into an agreement.

Types of Mental Incapacity:

 Insanity: A person who is declared legally insane (typically through a formal court process)
may lack the capacity to enter into contracts. These contracts can generally be considered
voidable by the individual once they regain mental capacity.
 Temporary Incompetence: In some cases, temporary conditions (such as severe intoxication
or an episode of mental illness) may render someone incapable of understanding a contract
at the time of signing. If the person can prove that they were unable to comprehend the
agreement, they may disaffirm the contract.

2|Pag e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Guardianship: A court may appoint a guardian to manage the affairs of a person who
is deemed incapable of handling their own matters due to mental illness,
developmental disability, or other conditions. Any contracts entered into by that person may
require the guardian's approval to be valid.

Key Points:

 Test of Mental Competence: In many jurisdictions, the law uses a test of "competency" or
"understanding" at the time the contract was made. If the person could not understand the
nature of the contract or the effects of their actions, the contract may be voidable.
 Necessities Exception: Similar to minors, contracts for necessities entered into by individuals
with mental incompetence are typically enforceable. For instance, if someone with a mental
condition purchases food or medicine, those contracts may still be upheld.

Example:

If a person with a serious mental illness enters into a contract to purchase a house while they are
experiencing a psychotic episode and cannot understand the implications, they may be able to
disaffirm the contract once their mental state stabilizes.

3. Intoxication and Contractual Capacity

When a person is intoxicated—whether by alcohol, drugs, or other substances—their capacity to

understand and consent to a contract may be impaired. However, intoxication does not
automatically invalidate a contract.

Key Points:

 Drunkenness as a Defense: If a person can prove they were so intoxicated that they could
not understand the nature of the agreement at the time of signing, they might be able to
disaffirm the contract. However, this defense is not easily proven.
 Partial Intoxication: If someone is only slightly intoxicated and still has the ability to
understand the contract, they may still be bound by it. Courts tend to favor upholding
contracts unless there is clear evidence that the individual was incapable of understanding
their actions.
 Restitution: Even if a contract is voided due to intoxication, the individual who disaffirms it
may be required to return any benefits received from the contract, or compensate the other
party for them, to avoid unjust enrichment.

Example:

A person signs a contract to buy a car after drinking heavily at a bar. If they can show that they were
so drunk that they didn’t understand the contract, they may be able to void the contract. However,
if they’ve driven the car off the lot and used it, they may need to return it or pay for its use.

4. Corporations and Legal Entities

Legal entities like corporations, partnerships, or LLCs also have contractual capacity, but with some
important distinctions from individuals.

3|Pag e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Key Points:

 Corporate Capacity: Corporations can enter into contracts through their officers or
directors. However, they can only contract within the scope of their business purposes or
governing documents (such as their articles of incorporation). If a corporation enters into a
contract outside the scope of its corporate powers (i.e., ultra vires acts), the contract may be
void or voidable.
 Partnerships and LLCs: Similarly, partnerships and LLCs can enter into contracts, but they
must do so according to the rules set out in their partnership agreement or operating
agreement.
 Authority to Contract: The individuals acting on behalf of a corporation or other legal entity
must have the proper authority. A contract signed by someone without the authority to do
so (such as an employee signing a deal outside their job responsibilities) might not be
binding on the entity.

Example:

A CEO signs a contract for the company to purchase office space. If the CEO had the authority to do
so (as outlined in the company’s bylaws), the contract is binding on the corporation. However, if the
CEO acted beyond their authority, the company might not be bound by the contract.

5. Public Policy and Legal Protections

The law provides these protections around capacity to ensure fairness and prevent exploitation,
especially for vulnerable individuals like minors and those with mental impairments. The law also
aims to protect people from entering into contracts that might be unconscionable or that they might
not fully understand.

Key Points:

 Unconscionability: In some cases, a contract may be deemed unenforceable not because of

lack of capacity, but because it is so one-sided or unfair that it shocks the conscience. A
court might refuse to enforce such a contract based on its inherent unfairness, even if the
parties had the capacity to contract.
 Duress or Undue Influence: If a contract was entered into under duress (threats) or undue
influence (exerting pressure on someone to act against their will), the affected party may
have grounds to void the contract, regardless of their capacity.

6. The Role of Consent and Understanding in Contractual Capacity

While we’ve touched on the importance of mental competence and age in determining a person’s
capacity to contract, it's equally important to consider consent and whether the individual truly
understands what they are agreeing to. This is often referred to as the meeting of the minds—that
is, both parties must agree to the contract’s terms knowingly and voluntarily.

Lack of Mental Competence or Understanding at the Time of the Contract

Even if a person is technically of age or not mentally ill, they may still lack the capacity to form a valid
contract if they don’t understand the nature of the agreement. Mistakes, misrepresentations, or
fraud can undermine genuine consent.

4|Pag e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

For instance, if someone with a cognitive impairment is coerced or manipulated into signing
a contract without fully understanding its consequences, the contract may be voidable on the
grounds of lack of mental competence and lack of genuine consent.

Understanding the Terms of a Contract

This is particularly relevant in cases involving contracts of adhesion—agreements that are drafted by
one party (often a business) with little or no negotiation from the other party (often a consumer).
Courts sometimes find such contracts unenforceable if the terms are too complex, the consumer
wasn’t given enough opportunity to read or understand them, or if there’s a significant imbalance of
power.

7. Specific Case Examples and Precedents

Case 1: Minor's Contract (Case: Rosenberg v. Rosenthal)

In this case, the court had to decide whether a contract entered into by a minor was enforceable. A
16-year-old minor had entered into a contract to buy a car. The court ruled that the contract was
voidable by the minor because of his age, as minors typically lack the capacity to contract. However,
the court found that the minor had used the car extensively and sold it, meaning he could not simply
return it. The court required the minor to restore the other party’s position (i.e., return the car or its
value) as part of the disaffirmance.

Key Takeaway:

The rule of necessities (like a car for transport) often applies here. Even if a minor enters into a
contract, there may be exceptions depending on the nature of the goods or services, and the minor
may have to restore the value received.

Case 2: Mental Incapacity (Case: Harvey v. Dowd)

In Harvey v. Dowd, a man with a mental condition entered into a contract to sell a piece of property
to a third party. The court ruled that the contract was voidable because the individual had been
legally declared incompetent at the time of signing. The court found that the seller did not fully
understand the consequences of the transaction, nor did he have the mental capacity to consent to
it.

Key Takeaway:

Mental incompetence can render a contract voidable if the person lacked the ability to understand
the nature and consequences of their actions. This case underscores the importance of a person’s
mental state and the protection of vulnerable individuals in contract law.

Case 3: Intoxication (Case: Lauter v. First National Bank of Arkansas)

In this case, a person signed a contract for a loan while heavily intoxicated. The individual claimed
they had been so intoxicated that they did not fully understand the implications of the contract. The
court ruled that while intoxication could be a valid defense to a contract, the individual had not
proven that they lacked understanding of the contract at the time of signing. The contract was
upheld because the intoxication did not meet the threshold of extreme impairment required to
invalidate the agreement.

5|Pag e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Key Takeaway:

Intoxication can be grounds for voiding a contract, but only if the intoxicated party can prove that
their mental faculties were so impaired they couldn't understand the nature of the contract. The
defense of intoxication is often difficult to prove, especially if the individual acted in a way that
suggests they had some understanding of the terms.

8. Corporate Capacity and Authority

When dealing with corporations, the concept of corporate capacity becomes crucial. While a
corporation, as a legal entity, has the capacity to enter into contracts, the authority of the
individuals who act on behalf of the corporation can impact whether a contract is binding.

Corporate Authority and Ultra Vires Contracts

An ultra vires contract is one that is beyond the powers of the corporation as defined by its charter
or laws. For example, if a corporation’s articles of incorporation specify that it is a software company
and one of its executives enters into a contract to buy real estate, this contract might be deemed
ultra vires (beyond the company’s scope of power) and could be voidable.

Case Example: A.P. Smith Manufacturing Co. v. Barlow

In this case, a corporation entered into a contract that was beyond its stated purpose. The court
ruled that the contract was void because it was ultra vires. The corporation’s capacity to act was
limited to what its charter permitted, and anything outside of that could not bind the company.

Key Takeaway:

Corporations and other legal entities can only enter into contracts within the scope of their powers,
and any act outside of those powers may not be enforceable. Understanding a corporation’s
governing documents (like articles of incorporation or bylaws) is key to understanding its ability to
contract.

9. Capacity in Specific Contexts

While the general rules for capacity apply to most situations, there are a few special categories of
contracts where capacity issues are handled differently.

Real Estate Contracts:

In many jurisdictions, contracts for the sale of real estate may have additional requirements for
capacity. A person must have full mental capacity to sign a deed for the transfer of property, as such
transactions are often considered more complex and irreversible than typical consumer contracts.

Contracts with Minors in Business:

In business law, the ability of minors to form contracts can be subject to stricter controls. For
example, if a minor enters into a business partnership, certain jurisdictions may allow the contract
to be enforceable if it’s deemed necessary for the minor’s career or livelihood, or if the business is
acting in the minor’s best interest.

6|Pag e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

10. Capacity and Public Policy

The laws surrounding capacity are largely rooted in public policy—the goal is to protect individuals
from being taken advantage of in situations where they might not fully understand the
consequences of their actions. This is why contracts with minors, mentally impaired persons, and
those under duress or undue influence are generally voidable.

Public policy considerations may also come into play when deciding if an individual or group has the
capacity to contract. For example:

 A person who is unduly pressured or coerced into a contract might be protected by the law,
regardless of their mental capacity, because the law recognizes the importance of free
consent.
 Unconscionable contracts—contracts that are deemed so one-sided and unfair—can also be
voided even if the parties technically had capacity to contract.

Key Takeaway:

The policy goal behind contract law is to ensure that agreements are made voluntarily, with a clear
understanding of the consequences, and to protect individuals from being exploited due to lack of
understanding or mental incapacity.

11. Conclusion: Why Capacity Matters

In summary, contractual capacity is essential because it ensures that agreements are made between
parties who can understand and consent to the terms. The law seeks to protect vulnerable
individuals (like minors and the mentally incapacitated) while ensuring that individuals and
businesses can rely on agreements that are made in good faith. Courts will consider various
factors—age, mental state, and intoxication—when determining whether a contract is enforceable.

The principles of capacity and consent are foundational to contract law, as they ensure that
contracts are formed between parties who have the legal ability to understand the nature of their
agreements. Where capacity is in question, courts will assess the circumstances surrounding the
contract, the individual's mental state, and the fairness of the agreement.

12. Capacity and Specific Types of Contracts

While we’ve already discussed general categories like minors, mental incapacity, and intoxication,
there are specific types of contracts where the issue of capacity is particularly nuanced. Let’s look at
some of the most common examples:

Employment Contracts and Capacity

 Minors and Employment: In many jurisdictions, minors can enter into employment
contracts, but there are additional protections in place. For instance, a minor may not be
able to work in certain industries, or they may only be allowed to work a limited number of
hours per week. Labor laws often stipulate that these contracts are voidable by the minor,
but they may still be held to the terms of the agreement if they benefit from the work (e.g.,
they have already received payment or completed work).
 Mentally Incompetent Employees: If an employee is mentally incapacitated at the time of
entering into an employment contract, their contract may be voidable. In some cases, this is
7|Pag e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

determined by whether the person could understand the nature of the contract.
However, many jurisdictions also require reasonable accommodation for mentally ill
employees under labor laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the U.S.
 Capacity and Compulsory Employment Contracts: In some cases (e.g., for military service or
certain government jobs), individuals may be compelled to enter into contracts due to
national service requirements, even if they don’t technically have full contractual capacity.
These contracts are often enforced by law, regardless of age or mental competence.

Marriage Contracts and Capacity

A marriage contract is a special type of agreement. While marriage itself is generally voluntary, the
capacity to marry can be subject to the mental competence of the individuals involved.

 Mental Incapacity and Marriage: If a person is mentally incompetent at the time of

marriage (due to a severe mental illness or cognitive disorder), the marriage could
potentially be voidable. In some cases, courts may grant an annulment if one party proves
that they were not able to understand the nature of the marriage contract.
 Age and Marriage: Most jurisdictions set a legal age for marriage (often 18), but minors may
be allowed to marry with parental consent or judicial approval. Even in these cases, the
minor might retain the ability to void the marriage later, as marriage is seen as an extremely
important contract with long-term personal consequences.

Real Estate Contracts and the Capacity to Buy Property

 Capacity in Real Estate Transactions: In the context of real estate contracts, capacity issues
can arise particularly with elderly individuals, those suffering from dementia, or people
under undue influence. These situations may involve fraud or duress, where the seller or
buyer did not have full understanding of the consequences of the transaction.
 Elderly and Capacity to Sell Property: In cases involving elderly individuals who may have
Alzheimer’s or another form of dementia, there is often scrutiny over whether they had the
mental capacity to sign over property. These cases can sometimes be complex, especially
when it’s unclear whether the person could understand the transaction. Guardianship or
power of attorney may be invoked if the person is found to lack capacity.
 Coercion or Undue Influence: If a person is coerced into selling property under threat or
duress, the contract may be voidable. This could apply to situations where a family member
pressures an elderly parent to sell a house under the threat of financial harm or other types
of exploitation.

Contracts for the Sale of Goods (UCC and Capacity)

Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in the U.S., the rules regarding the capacity to enter into
contracts for the sale of goods are similar to those in general contract law, but there are some
additional nuances:

 Minors and the Sale of Goods: Under the UCC, a minor generally cannot disaffirm a contract
for goods that are necessary (like food, clothing, or medical supplies). However, if the goods
are not considered essential, a minor may still have the option to disaffirm the contract.
 Mental Incapacity and Sale of Goods: If a person is mentally incapacitated, contracts for the
sale of goods are typically voidable unless the goods purchased were essential. The buyer
would need to show that they did not understand the nature of the contract at the time of
the purchase.

8|Pag e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

13. Capacity and Contract Enforcement

The issue of capacity plays a significant role in determining whether a contract can be enforced in
court. In situations where capacity is questioned, courts often weigh several factors to decide
whether the contract is valid. Here are some of the factors that may influence a court’s decision:

Capacity as a Defense to Enforcement

A party claiming they lacked capacity may use this as a defense in a lawsuit over the contract. If the
defendant can prove they were a minor, mentally incompetent, or intoxicated at the time of the
contract formation, they may be able to void the contract or limit its enforcement.

Restitution and Equitable Remedies

Even if a contract is voidable due to lack of capacity, the party seeking to void the contract may still
be required to make restitution. For example, if a minor disaffirms a contract for the purchase of
goods, they may be required to return the goods (or pay for their value) before the contract is
voided.

In cases where equitable remedies are involved (such as specific performance or injunctive relief),
courts may consider whether a party lacked the capacity to form the contract as a reason to prevent
enforcement of the contract.

Ratification of Contracts

Once a person who lacked capacity (e.g., a minor or someone who was mentally impaired) reaches
the age of majority or regains mental competence, they may ratify a contract they previously
entered into. This is a formal decision to affirm the contract, making it enforceable as if the person
had the full capacity to enter into the contract originally.

For example, a minor who entered into a contract when they were 16 may choose to ratify the
contract when they turn 18, making it binding. The individual might explicitly ratify the contract by
continuing to perform under its terms, such as continuing to pay for a purchased item or service.

Void vs. Voidable Contracts

It’s important to distinguish between void and voidable contracts:

 Void Contracts: If a contract is made by someone who is legally incapable of contracting

(such as a person declared mentally incompetent by a court), the contract is void from the
outset. This means the contract has no legal effect and cannot be enforced by either party.
 Voidable Contracts: If a person with limited capacity (such as a minor or a person who is
intoxicated) enters into a contract, the contract is generally voidable at their discretion. This
means the party with limited capacity can choose to either affirm or disaffirm the contract.
If the party chooses to disaffirm, the contract is rendered void.

9|Pag e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

14. Practical Implications of Contractual Capacity in Litigation

Understanding capacity and its implications in litigation is vital. Legal practitioners need to consider
capacity issues early on in cases involving contract disputes. Some of the practical issues lawyers and
judges need to be mindful of include:

 Witness Testimony: Often, the mental state of a party needs to be examined. In cases
involving mental incapacity, a court might require expert testimony (e.g., from a
psychologist or psychiatrist) to establish the mental condition of the individual at the time
the contract was made.
 Burden of Proof: In cases involving intoxication or mental incompetence, the party asserting
a lack of capacity generally carries the burden of proving it. They must show clear and
convincing evidence that they were unable to understand the contract.
 Statutes of Limitation: In some cases, the ability to disaffirm a contract may be subject to
statutes of limitation. For example, a minor may have the right to disaffirm a contract, but
they may have a limited time frame (typically up to a few years after reaching the age of
majority) in which to do so.

15. Final Thoughts: The Future of Contractual Capacity in Law

As society and business evolve, contract law continues to adapt to new realities. The digital age,
with the rise of online contracts and artificial intelligence, is likely to challenge traditional notions of
capacity. For instance, how do we assess the capacity of individuals engaging in digital contracts,
especially with automated agents or platforms that make contract formation seamless but complex?

There is also increasing focus on capacity in areas like consumer protection, privacy law, and
cybersecurity. We may see more stringent protections for individuals entering contracts in digital
spaces, as online contracts are often non-negotiable and take-it-or-leave-it, much like contracts of
adhesion.

16. Emerging Issues in Contractual Capacity

As the world becomes more connected and digital, issues related to capacity are evolving. Let’s take
a look at a few areas where capacity-related challenges are becoming more prominent.

Digital Contracts and Capacity

With the rise of e-commerce and digital platforms, many people now enter into contracts online,
often without physically signing anything. The challenge here is determining whether the individual
has the mental capacity to enter into the agreement in a virtual environment. Here are a few
emerging considerations:

 Age Verification: Online contracts, particularly for things like social media accounts,
subscriptions, or purchasing services, often involve a click-wrap agreement (where the user
clicks "I Agree" to terms). But how do we ensure that the user has the required mental
capacity to understand the contract, especially for minors? For example, many platforms
don't have robust mechanisms to verify the user's mental competence, only their age.
 Click-Through Agreements and Mental Competence: The "I agree" button has become
ubiquitous, but how much do users really understand about the legal ramifications of what
they are agreeing to? In many cases, users might not fully comprehend the terms, raising

10 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

questions about the fairness and enforceability of such contracts, especially for
users who may be mentally impaired or intoxicated while using the platform.
 AI and Contract Formation: With the advent of AI-powered bots and assistants (like virtual
agents or automated systems), a new question arises: Who is actually entering into the
contract? If an individual is interacting with an AI to make a purchase or agree to terms, how
do we determine whether the human involved had the required mental capacity? This is an
area still being developed in the legal system, but it's becoming a significant issue as more
contracts are entered into without human interaction.

Capacity in the Context of Consumer Protection

Many consumer protection laws focus on ensuring that individuals entering into contracts with
businesses have the necessary capacity to make informed decisions. In these situations, laws tend to
focus more on protecting vulnerable groups (such as minors, mentally impaired individuals, or those
under duress). Here’s how these protections play out:

 Contracts of Adhesion and Consumer Law: Many consumer contracts (for things like phone
services, insurance, or subscription boxes) are “contracts of adhesion”—where the
consumer has little choice but to accept the terms as presented. Unconscionability can
often come into play when consumers argue that these contracts are unfair or one-sided,
especially if they lacked the capacity to properly understand the terms.
 Misleading and Deceptive Practices: Some jurisdictions provide specific protections against
contracts that involve fraudulent misrepresentation or deceptive business practices, where
the consumer was not in a position to make an informed decision. A consumer might not
have the capacity to comprehend misleading marketing or fraud, and thus the contract
could be voidable.
 Digital Consumer Contracts: Many online platforms, such as e-commerce websites or
gaming services, use automated user agreements where the consumer may not fully
appreciate the terms. This is problematic when minors or mentally impaired individuals are
signing contracts online, raising questions about whether they have the legal capacity to
enter into such agreements.

17. The Role of Capacity in Equitable Remedies

When a contract is challenged based on the lack of capacity, the court may grant equitable
remedies. These remedies seek to restore fairness in cases where one party claims they lacked the
capacity to contract. Here are some examples of equitable remedies and their application in
capacity-based disputes:

Restitution

If a contract is voided or rescinded due to lack of capacity, restitution might be required to prevent
unjust enrichment. The goal is to restore the parties to their positions before the contract was
made.

 Example: A minor enters into a contract for a mobile phone and later disaffirms it. They
return the phone, but the provider may claim restitution for the service already provided
(such as data or minutes consumed). The court may order the minor to pay for those
benefits, even though they disaffirm the contract.

11 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Rescission

Rescission is an equitable remedy that involves the cancellation of a contract. This remedy is often
applied in cases of fraud, duress, or where capacity is in question (e.g., a mentally impaired
individual signing a contract). The goal of rescission is to restore the parties to their original positions
before the contract was executed.

 Example: A person suffering from a temporary mental impairment enters into a contract to
purchase a car. If the impairment was severe enough to render them incapable of
understanding the contract, the contract may be rescinded, and the parties would be
returned to their original positions.

Specific Performance

Specific performance is a remedy where the court orders one party to perform the contract as
originally agreed. While this is usually applied to contracts involving unique goods (like real estate or
art), it can sometimes be complicated in cases where the contract was made with a party who lacked
capacity. Courts often hesitate to compel specific performance if the party lacked the mental
capacity to understand the contract when it was made.

 Example: A guardian signs a contract on behalf of a mentally incapacitated person. Later, the
individual seeks to void the contract. The court may not enforce specific performance,
especially if the agreement was not in the best interest of the incapacitated party.

18. Capacity and International Contract Law

The principles of contractual capacity are generally consistent across jurisdictions, but there can be
variations, especially in international contracts. Different countries may have their own laws
governing minors, mental incapacity, and intoxication in contract formation. Let’s explore a few
examples of how capacity is treated differently in various countries:

Common Law vs. Civil Law Systems

 Common Law: In countries like the U.S. and the U.K., minors generally lack full capacity to
contract, but can disaffirm contracts. The principle of voidable contracts applies, and there
are strong protections for minors and mentally incapacitated individuals.
 Civil Law: In civil law countries, such as those in Europe or Latin America, the rules governing
capacity may be similar, but there can be more emphasis on public policy and family law
protections. For instance, in France, a contract entered into by a minor is void if it is a
serious contract (such as a real estate transaction), but could be valid for contracts involving
everyday necessities. Additionally, in France, mentally incapacitated individuals are placed
under the care of a guardian, and contracts made by these individuals may be scrutinized
and voided.

International Arbitration and Capacity

When a contract dispute is settled through international arbitration, issues of capacity become
complex, especially when parties from different legal systems are involved. Arbitration panels need
to consider the legal capacity of the parties in each jurisdiction and apply the appropriate rules
based on the governing law of the contract.

12 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

For example, a French company may sign a contract with a U.S. corporation, and if a dispute
arises regarding the capacity of one of the individuals (say, one party claims they were
mentally incapacitated at the time of signing), the panel would have to navigate the conflicting laws
between these two legal systems.

19. The Role of Technology in Assessing Capacity

As technology becomes a more integral part of contract formation, artificial intelligence (AI) and
machine learning are beginning to play a role in assessing capacity. Some key developments
include:

AI in Legal Analysis:

AI tools can now be used to analyze contracts and determine whether a party might have been
under undue influence or lacked the mental capacity to understand a contract. This could involve
data analytics that review patterns of behavior or historical data about the individual’s mental
state.

Blockchain and Capacity:

In the world of smart contracts powered by blockchain, the issue of capacity becomes more
interesting. A smart contract is a self-executing contract with the terms of the agreement directly
written into lines of code. While blockchain technology allows for faster and more secure contract
execution, who signs the contract (and whether they have the capacity) remains an open issue.
Future developments might involve integrating identity verification systems or cognitive
assessments into blockchain platforms to ensure that only those with capacity are able to sign and
execute such contracts.

20. Conclusion: The Ongoing Evolution of Contractual Capacity

Contract law is constantly evolving, especially as it intersects with new technologies, changing
societal norms, and global legal systems. Contractual capacity remains a critical concept in ensuring
fairness and justice in the formation of contracts. Whether through protections for minors, mentally
incapacitated individuals, or those under duress, the law’s primary goal is to prevent exploitation
and ensure that contracts are entered into voluntarily and with an understanding of their
consequences.

13 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Who is Competent to Contract

In contract law, the competency of parties refers to the legal ability of individuals or entities to enter
into a binding agreement. For a contract to be valid and enforceable, the parties involved must have
the necessary legal capacity to do so. The requirements for competency vary depending on
jurisdiction, but generally, the following criteria are considered:

1. Age of Majority

 Minors: Individuals under the age of majority (usually 18 in most jurisdictions) are generally
considered legally incapable of entering into contracts. Contracts entered into by minors are
typically voidable at the minor's discretion, meaning the minor can choose to enforce or
disaffirm the contract. However, there are exceptions, such as contracts for necessities (e.g.,
food, clothing, medical care) or contracts that benefit the minor (e.g., employment).
 Adults: Individuals who are 18 or older are usually considered legally competent to contract
unless another issue arises.

2. Mental Capacity

 Persons with Mental Impairments: A person must have the mental capacity to understand
the nature and consequences of the contract for it to be binding. If someone is mentally
incapacitated due to illness, intoxication, or a developmental condition, they may lack the
capacity to contract.
 Involuntary Commitments: If someone is adjudicated as mentally incompetent by a court,
they are generally unable to enter into a valid contract unless the contract is approved by a
legal guardian or a court.

3. Intoxication

 A person who is intoxicated (by drugs or alcohol) to the point of being unable to understand
the nature of the contract at the time of entering it may lack the capacity to contract. If a
person becomes intoxicated after entering the contract, it doesn't necessarily invalidate the
contract, but if intoxication is proven at the time of signing, the contract may be voidable.

4. Legal Entities (Corporations, Partnerships, etc.)

 Corporations and Partnerships: Businesses and legal entities, such as corporations, limited
liability companies (LLCs), and partnerships, can enter into contracts. These entities must act
through authorized representatives (e.g., officers or partners) who are competent to act on
behalf of the entity.

5. Contracts with Legal Restrictions

 Certain individuals may be restricted by law from entering into certain types of contracts,
even if they are legally competent. For example, people who have been banned from doing
business in a particular area or those subject to specific legal restrictions might not be
allowed to enter into certain contracts (e.g., a person who has been convicted of a financial
crime may be restricted from entering into certain business contracts).

14 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Summary of Competency:

1. Minors: Generally, they lack full capacity to contract, with exceptions for necessary items.
2. Mental Incapacity: A person must understand the nature and effect of their actions when
entering a contract.
3. Intoxication: A contract may be voidable if intoxication prevents a person from
understanding the contract.
4. Legal Entities: Corporations, partnerships, etc., can contract through authorized
representatives.
5. Legal Restrictions: Some individuals are restricted from entering specific contracts by law.

If any party lacks the required competency to contract, the contract could be void, voidable, or
unenforceable depending on the circumstances and jurisdiction.

6. Persons Under Legal Disability

 Persons Under Guardianship: If a court has appointed a guardian for an individual due to a
mental or physical condition, the individual may not have the legal capacity to contract. The
guardian would need to act on their behalf. Contracts made by such individuals without
guardian approval are usually void or voidable.
 Incompetence Due to Physical Disabilities: In some jurisdictions, physical disabilities may
also affect one’s ability to contract if it impedes their ability to understand the contract's
nature or its consequences. For example, if someone cannot read or write, they may not be
able to fully understand the terms of a contract unless the agreement is explained to them
in a way they can comprehend (e.g., using an interpreter).

7. Contractual Capacity of Aliens (Non-citizens)

 Foreign Nationals: A foreign national (non-citizen) generally has the same ability to enter
into contracts as a citizen, but there may be restrictions depending on the country and the
type of contract. For example, certain countries impose restrictions on foreigners entering
into contracts relating to land ownership or other activities that involve national security. In
such cases, foreign nationals may need to meet specific legal requirements to contract in a
given jurisdiction.
 Immigration Status: If a person is in a country unlawfully (e.g., an undocumented
immigrant), they may be restricted from entering into certain contracts or may not have the
capacity to do so in some legal systems.

8. Marital Status and Contracts

 Married Individuals: In many jurisdictions, a married person generally has the capacity to
contract in their own name. However, in some legal systems, one spouse may need the
consent of the other to enter into certain contracts (e.g., buying or selling property). This is
especially true in community property systems where both spouses have ownership over
assets acquired during the marriage.
 Minors or Restricted Spouses: In some jurisdictions, certain contracts entered into by one
spouse may require the express consent of the other, especially in relation to the disposal of
family property or contracts that could impact the family as a whole.

15 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

9. Public Policy and Illegal Contracts

 Contracts Against Public Policy: Even if the parties involved are legally competent, certain
contracts are considered illegal or against public policy, rendering them unenforceable. For
example, contracts for illegal activities (e.g., drug trafficking, illegal gambling) or contracts
that involve criminal conduct (e.g., hiring someone to commit a crime) are not valid, even if
all parties have the necessary competency to contract.
 Contracts with Minors Involving Illegal Activities: A contract entered into by a minor may
be voidable, but if it involves illegal activities (e.g., illegal gambling, illicit drugs), it can be
void ab initio (invalid from the outset) regardless of the minor's ability to contract.

10. Disaffirmation and Ratification

 Disaffirmation (Voidable Contracts): A minor who enters into a contract generally has the
right to disaffirm (cancel) the contract before reaching the age of majority or within a
reasonable time after turning 18. This means that even if a contract was made with a minor,
the minor can choose to void it. However, once the minor reaches the age of majority and
doesn’t disaffirm the contract, it may be ratified (approved), making it enforceable.
 Exceptions to Disaffirmation:
o Necessaries: A minor may not be able to disaffirm contracts for essential goods or
services like food, clothing, shelter, or medical care, as these are considered
necessary items for the minor’s well-being.
o Student Loans: Some types of contracts, such as student loans or other financial
agreements, may not be subject to disaffirmation once they are entered into, even if
the individual was a minor at the time of signing.

11. Void vs. Voidable Contracts

 Void Contracts: A contract is void if it is not legally enforceable from the outset due to
reasons like the lack of legal capacity, the subject matter being illegal, or if the agreement
violates public policy. For example, a contract between two individuals for illegal activities
(e.g., selling stolen goods) is void and cannot be enforced by either party.
 Voidable Contracts: A contract is voidable if one of the parties involved has the right to
rescind (cancel) the contract. For example, contracts entered into by minors are voidable at
the minor’s discretion. If the minor chooses to disaffirm the contract, it becomes void.
However, if the minor chooses to affirm the contract (either after reaching the age of
majority or within a reasonable time), it becomes enforceable.

12. Intellectual Property (IP) and Competence

 Contracts Involving IP: When it comes to intellectual property, individuals and businesses
need to ensure that they have the legal capacity to transfer or license IP. For example, an
individual under a legal disability may not have the ability to transfer IP rights unless they
have proper legal representation. Additionally, contracts that involve IP rights need to be
clear, precise, and in accordance with specific IP laws to be enforceable.
 Corporations: A corporation or business entity can enter into contracts involving IP, but the
individuals acting on behalf of the corporation must have the proper authorization and legal
capacity to do so.

16 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

13. Employment Contracts

 Employee Competence: Employees, generally speaking, have the capacity to enter into
employment contracts. However, certain workers (e.g., minors or mentally incapacitated
persons) may not be able to engage in some employment contracts. The law may impose
restrictions on the types of work minors or disabled individuals can undertake.
 Employers: Employers (corporations, partnerships, etc.) can also enter into employment
contracts with employees through authorized representatives, such as HR managers or
business owners. However, they must comply with labor laws and restrictions that apply to
employment contracts.

14. Fiduciary Relationships and Competency

 Fiduciaries: A fiduciary (e.g., trustee, lawyer, or agent) has a legal duty to act in the best
interests of another party (the principal). A contract entered into by a fiduciary on behalf of
their principal must not only respect the legal competence of both parties, but it must also
adhere to the fiduciary duties of loyalty, care, and full disclosure.

Conclusion

The competency to contract is crucial for ensuring that agreements are fair, voluntary, and legally
binding. It protects vulnerable parties such as minors, mentally incapacitated individuals, and others
who may not fully understand or consent to the terms of a contract. Laws surrounding competency
vary depending on jurisdiction and the type of contract involved, but understanding the basic
requirements is essential for enforcing and entering into legally binding agreements.

15. Contracts Involving Specific Professions or Regulated Fields

 Professionals and Licensing Requirements: Certain professions or activities require specific

licensing or legal qualifications to engage in contractual relationships. For instance, lawyers,
doctors, architects, and accountants typically need to be licensed by the state or
government to practice. A contract made by an unlicensed professional in relation to their
specific field of expertise might be void or voidable depending on the jurisdiction. In some
cases, the contract may be unenforceable, even if the person is competent in all other
respects, because they lack the required professional licensing.
 Example: A contract between a non-licensed contractor and a homeowner for building
services may be void if the contractor is required by law to be licensed to perform such
work. However, this may vary depending on local law and the nature of the services.

16. Social and Domestic Contracts

 Social or Domestic Agreements: In many jurisdictions, contracts made in a social or

domestic setting (e.g., agreements between family members or friends) may not be legally
enforceable because they are presumed not to be intended as legally binding. The law
generally assumes that parties in informal relationships, like friends or family, are not
entering into contracts that require legal consequences. The intent to create legal relations
is an essential element for the formation of a contract.
 Example: If a parent agrees to lend their child money for a trip, the agreement may not be
legally enforceable unless the intent to create legal obligations is clear (e.g., through written
terms or documentation).

17 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

17. Competency of Corporations, Partnerships, and Limited Liability Companies (LLCs)

 Corporations: A corporation is a legal entity that can enter into contracts and be bound by
them. However, for the contract to be enforceable, the person signing on behalf of the
corporation must have the authority to do so. Corporate governance rules typically set out
who within the company has the authority to bind the company (e.g., the CEO, CFO, or
board members). If an individual signs a contract on behalf of the corporation without
proper authorization, the contract may be voidable by the corporation.
 Partnerships: Partnerships are often governed by partnership agreements, and a partner's
authority to contract on behalf of the partnership is generally outlined in the partnership
agreement. In the absence of such an agreement, partners may have implied authority to
enter into contracts related to the business's purpose, but they are limited by the
partnership’s scope and structure.
 Limited Liability Companies (LLCs): Similar to corporations, LLCs have legal personhood and
can enter into contracts, but the members or managers must act within the scope of their
managerial authority. If someone outside the LLC’s management signs a contract, it may not
bind the LLC unless the LLC adopts the contract.

18. Duress, Undue Influence, and Coercion

 Duress and Coercion: If a person enters into a contract under duress (e.g., threats of harm,
physical force, or unlawful imprisonment), their ability to consent is compromised.
Therefore, they lack the mental capacity to contract freely. Similarly, contracts entered into
under extreme coercion or threats are considered voidable because the agreement was not
made voluntarily.
 Undue Influence: Undue influence refers to a situation where one party uses their power or
trust over another (e.g., a caregiver influencing an elderly person) to gain unfair advantage
in the contract. This can lead to a voidable contract because the affected party did not freely
agree to the terms. The courts may assess the relationship between the parties to determine
if undue influence occurred.

19. Fraud, Misrepresentation, and False Pretenses

 Fraudulent Contracts: A contract entered into based on fraudulent misrepresentation is

generally considered voidable. If one party intentionally deceives another by making false
statements to induce them into entering a contract, this constitutes fraud. The victim of
fraud can choose to rescind the contract and seek remedies.
 Misrepresentation: If a party makes an innocent misrepresentation (a false statement made
without intent to deceive), the contract may still be voidable by the misled party if they can
show that the misrepresentation was significant enough to affect their decision to contract.
 Example: If a person enters into a contract to buy property based on false information about
the property’s condition, they may have grounds to void the contract if they can prove that
they were misled.

20. Contracts with Unconscionable Terms

 Unconscionable Contracts: A contract may be considered unenforceable if it is

unconscionable—meaning the terms are so unfair or one-sided that they shock the
conscience. The courts may intervene to protect a party who has entered into a contract
under circumstances that suggest extreme disadvantage or lack of understanding.

18 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Example: A contract that binds a person to an extremely high interest rate on a loan
(predatory lending) might be deemed unconscionable if it is deemed to have been
made under circumstances of unequal bargaining power.

21. Contracts and Public Policy

 Contracts Against Public Policy: Even if the parties are competent, a contract may be void if
it violates public policy. This can include contracts that promote illegal activity, harm the
public interest, or go against established social norms or legal standards.
 Examples of Invalid Contracts:
o Contracts for illegal gambling.
o Contracts that promote discrimination or violate civil rights.
o Contracts involving human trafficking or exploitation.

22. Statutory Exceptions to Competency Requirements

 Statutory Restrictions on Competency: Some contracts have statutory exceptions where

certain individuals may be deemed competent to contract despite their apparent incapacity.
For instance:
o Minors and Emancipation: A minor may be able to enter into a contract once they
are legally emancipated, which typically means they are considered legally
independent from their parents or guardians, often due to marriage or a court order.
o Mental Incompetence and Contracts with a Guardian: A person declared mentally
incompetent by a court may still be able to contract if they have a legal guardian or if
the contract is for the person’s benefit (e.g., entering into a contract for medical care
or legal services).

23. Electronic Contracts (E-Contracts) and Competency

 Digital and Online Contracts: With the rise of digital contracts (e.g., online agreements),
questions of competency become relevant in ensuring that individuals entering into e-
contracts (e.g., online purchases, software licensing agreements) have the capacity to
understand the nature of the contract. Digital agreements, often presented through click-
wrap (clicking "I agree" to terms and conditions), require the same competency standards as
traditional contracts.
 Ensuring Validity of E-Contracts: The digital nature of these contracts does not absolve the
need for parties to possess the capacity to understand and consent to the terms. In many
cases, courts will enforce e-contracts, as long as the party had the opportunity to review the
terms and demonstrate consent.

24. Legal Consequences of Lack of Capacity

 Voidable Contracts: If one of the parties lacks the legal capacity to enter into a contract
(e.g., a minor), the contract may be voidable by the incapacitated party. This means they can
choose to either affirm or disaffirm the contract.
 Void Contracts: If a contract is entered into by someone who is legally incapable of
contracting (e.g., a mentally incompetent person who has not been appointed a guardian),
the contract may be void, meaning it is not enforceable by either party.

19 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

25. Judicial Intervention

 Court’s Role in Assessing Competency: In cases where a party’s competency is in question

(e.g., a minor, mentally ill person, or intoxicated individual), the court may be called upon to
evaluate whether that person had the ability to understand the nature of the contract.
Courts are typically cautious when determining whether a contract should be enforced in
such cases, often giving greater weight to protecting vulnerable parties.

Final Thoughts

Competency to contract is a fundamental concept in contract law, as it ensures that individuals and
entities enter into binding agreements with the full understanding and intention to be bound by the
terms. While the general rules of competency apply in most cases, various exceptions and
circumstances can affect whether a contract is enforceable. It's essential to understand the nature
of the contract, the parties involved, and local laws to navigate competency issues effectively.

26. Capacity of Corporations and Legal Entities to Contract

 Capacity of Corporations: As legal entities, corporations have the inherent ability to

contract, but the competency to contract extends to their authorized agents. For a
corporation to be legally bound by a contract, the individual signing on its behalf must have
proper authority—either from the board of directors, an officer of the company, or some
other form of delegation.
 Ultra Vires Acts: A contract entered into by a corporation that is beyond its corporate
powers may be considered ultra vires (beyond the powers) and, therefore, unenforceable.
For example, if a corporation is formed to deal with consumer goods and attempts to enter
into a contract involving real estate (a non-related business activity), the contract could be
void unless specifically authorized by the corporation’s articles of incorporation or a relevant
shareholder vote.

27. Legal Consequences of Lack of Capacity

 Rescission: If one party lacks the legal capacity to enter into a contract, the contract can
often be rescinded (cancelled). Rescission generally returns the parties to their pre-contract
positions, where each party is expected to give back what they received under the contract.
For example, if a minor enters into a contract and later decides to disaffirm it, they can
return the item purchased (if it’s still in their possession) to undo the contract.
 Restitution: In some cases, the party who lacked capacity might still be required to restore
the benefit they received under the contract. This is known as restitution. For instance, if a
minor disaffirms a contract for a purchase, but the item has been consumed or damaged,
the minor may need to return the value of the item.

28. Capacity and Undue Influence

 Undue Influence: Undue influence occurs when one party uses their position of power,
trust, or authority over another party to persuade them to enter into a contract. This is often
seen in relationships involving caregivers, trustees, or elderly persons. Undue influence may
undermine the true free will of the individual and render the contract voidable. Courts
closely scrutinize these situations to prevent exploitation.

20 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Example: An elderly person who is heavily dependent on a caregiver might be

influenced to sign a contract that benefits the caregiver unfairly. If undue influence is
proven, the contract may be voided.

29. Mental Incapacity and Specific Legal Tests

 Mental Competency: A person must have the ability to understand the nature and
consequences of the contract they are entering. Courts may use different tests to determine
mental capacity:
o Cognitive Test: The individual must understand the terms and subject matter of the
contract.
o Volitional Test: The person must be able to act in their own best interest without
being coerced or manipulated due to mental illness.
 Incapacity Due to Mental Illness: In cases involving mental illness, courts will often require
medical or psychological evaluations to determine whether a person’s mental state affects
their ability to contract. If the person lacks capacity, the contract may be voidable. However,
if the person later regains their mental competence or ratifies the contract after treatment, it
could be enforceable.

30. Contractual Capacity in Cases of Intoxication

 Intoxication: A person who is intoxicated (due to drugs, alcohol, or other substances) may
be unable to understand the nature of the contract or make a rational decision. Intoxication
alone does not automatically render a contract void. The courts typically look for evidence
that the intoxicated party was unable to comprehend the nature and consequences of the
contract at the time it was formed.
 Example: If someone enters into a high-value contract while extremely intoxicated, and they
can prove they did not understand what they were doing (e.g., they were incapable of
recognizing the consequences of their actions), they might be able to void the contract.

31. Capacity of Minors: More Complexities

 Necessaries: While minors generally cannot contract, they are allowed to enter into
contracts for "necessaries." These are items essential for a person’s basic needs, including
food, clothing, shelter, and medical services. Importantly, minors are still liable for the
reasonable value of necessaries even if they disaffirm the contract.
 Example: A minor who buys clothes or food on credit might be required to pay for them,
even if the contract is disaffirmed. However, they are not required to pay the full contract
price if the terms were unfair or if the necessity was overpriced.
 Marriage and Emancipation: In some jurisdictions, a minor can gain the capacity to contract
by becoming emancipated, either through marriage, court approval, or by living
independently. Once emancipated, the minor may be considered an adult for legal purposes
and may be held fully responsible for contracts made.

32. Jurisdictional Variations in Contractual Capacity

 International Contracts: In international contracts, the issue of competency to contract

becomes more complex due to differing laws in various countries. What is considered a
competent party in one jurisdiction might be viewed differently in another. For example:
o Some countries might allow a minor to enter into contracts for certain transactions,
while others might not recognize such contracts at all.

21 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

o In certain jurisdictions, mental capacity laws may vary significantly, with

some countries offering a more flexible approach to mental health and
decision-making in contract formation.
 Private International Law (Conflict of Laws): When contracts cross borders, parties must
determine which jurisdiction's rules will apply to questions of capacity. Private international
law deals with issues such as which law governs the capacity of an individual to contract,
especially when the parties are in different countries. This can be critical when dealing with
international transactions.

33. Business Implications of Competency

 Due Diligence in Hiring: When businesses enter into contracts with individuals (e.g.,
employment contracts), they should take steps to verify the capacity of the person they are
contracting with. For example, ensuring that employees or agents have mental competency,
legal adulthood, and the right to work may prevent complications later.
 Contractual Disputes in Business: For business partnerships, joint ventures, and corporate
transactions, the question of whether an individual had the authority to bind the company
or whether the corporation’s officers were acting within their legal scope of authority is
crucial. Companies should ensure that their internal governance aligns with legal capacity
standards to avoid challenges to contractual obligations.

34. Contracts Involving Real Estate

 Contracts for Real Estate Transactions: Some jurisdictions impose stricter standards on the
capacity to contract in real estate. For example, a person who has been adjudicated as
mentally incompetent might be allowed to enter into a contract for a home purchase with
the approval of a legal guardian. Similarly, minors might not have the full legal capacity to
buy or sell real estate unless they are emancipated.
 Real Estate Agents: Real estate agents, like other agents, must have legal capacity and
proper licensing to engage in real estate contracts. Contracts entered into by agents who
lack authorization could be invalid.

35. Case Law Examples

 Case 1: Cowan v. O’Connor (2011): A case involving a minor’s ability to disaffirm a contract
for a mobile phone purchase. The court ruled that the minor could not disaffirm the contract
because the phone was considered a necessary, and therefore, the minor was required to
pay for it.
 Case 2: De Los Santos v. IBC Bank (2003): This case involved a mentally incompetent person
who signed a loan agreement while under the influence of medication. The court ruled that
the loan was voidable, as the party lacked the capacity to understand the contract at the
time of signing.
 Case 3: Lloyds Bank Ltd. v. Bundy (1975): The court held that undue influence had been
exerted over a vulnerable, elderly man who signed a contract to guarantee his son’s debts.
The contract was deemed voidable because the man was influenced by his son's position of
trust.

36. Final Considerations

 Clarity and Fairness: It’s crucial to ensure that contracts are clear and fair, especially when
one party might be at a disadvantage or under duress. This applies particularly to vulnerable

22 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

individuals, such as minors, the elderly, or those with limited mental capacity.
Ensuring that contractual terms are reasonable and not exploitative can prevent
future disputes.
 Importance of Legal Advice: Parties entering into significant contracts should consult with
legal professionals to ensure they are not inadvertently entering into agreements that are
voidable or subject to legal challenges. This is especially true for contracts involving people
who may be at risk of lacking legal competency.

In summary, competency to contract is a multifaceted area of law that affects individuals and
businesses alike. Understanding the various factors, including age, mental capacity, intoxication, and
the rules governing different types of contracts, is essential to navigating and avoiding potential legal
complications.

23 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Position of a Minor

In contract law, the capacity of parties to enter into a binding contract is a fundamental concept.
One important aspect of this is the position of a minor—a person who has not yet reached the age
of majority, typically 18 years old in many jurisdictions.

Legal Position of a Minor in Contract Law:

1. General Rule:
A minor generally lacks the legal capacity to contract. This means that any contract entered
into by a minor is typically voidable at the minor's discretion, meaning the minor can choose
to disaffirm (cancel) the contract.
2. Voidable Contracts:
Contracts entered into by a minor are usually voidable, not void, which means the minor
can:
o Disaffirm the contract and refuse to perform obligations under it.
o Be entitled to return goods or services received, with exceptions based on the
jurisdiction and the nature of the contract.

However, a minor may affirm (choose to continue with) the contract once they reach the
age of majority (18), depending on local law.

3. Exceptions to the General Rule:

In some cases, contracts with minors may still be enforceable. These exceptions can vary by
jurisdiction, but typical exceptions include:
o Contracts for Necessaries: A minor can be bound by a contract for goods and
services that are considered "necessaries," which typically include food, clothing,
shelter, and sometimes medical services. In these cases, the minor may be required
to pay for the goods or services at a reasonable price.
o Beneficial Contracts: Contracts that are deemed to benefit the minor, such as a
contract for a beneficial educational course, might be enforceable.
o Contracts with Parent/Guardian Consent: In some jurisdictions, if the minor’s
parent or guardian consents to a contract, it may be binding.
4. Ratification:
If a minor enters into a contract and does not disaffirm it before reaching the age of
majority, the contract can sometimes become ratified, meaning it becomes legally binding
after the minor turns 18.
5. Misrepresentation of Age:
If a minor misrepresents their age and enters into a contract, they may still have the right to
disaffirm the contract. However, some jurisdictions may hold them accountable for any
damage caused by the misrepresentation or fraud.

Practical Example:

 A 16-year-old purchases a smartphone on credit. When the minor turns 18, they can choose
to disaffirm the contract and refuse to pay for the phone. However, if the phone was deemed
a "necessity" or if the seller can prove the minor misrepresented their age, the seller might
be able to enforce the contract under certain conditions.

24 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

In summary, the general principle is that minors are not bound by most contracts they enter
into, but there are exceptions based on the nature of the contract and local laws. The
concept aims to protect minors from making potentially harmful or unwise legal commitments while
still ensuring they are not unjustly enriched in situations involving essential goods or services.

Detailed Analysis of Contracts Involving Minors

1. Voidable Contracts:
A minor's contract is typically voidable rather than void, meaning the minor has the option
to disaffirm or cancel the contract while still a minor or within a reasonable period after
reaching the age of majority. If a minor disaffirms a contract, they generally must return any
goods or services they received, although there can be variations based on local law. If the
minor cannot return the goods (e.g., they’ve consumed them), they may still be able to
disaffirm the contract but might need to pay for the value of what was received.
2. Ratification of Contracts upon Reaching Majority:
A contract that was voidable due to the minor’s status can become ratified when the minor
turns 18, if they choose to affirm the contract after reaching the age of majority. Ratification
can occur through:
o Expressed Consent: The minor, upon reaching the age of majority, verbally or in
writing agrees to continue with the contract.
o Implied Ratification: The minor may also ratify the contract by acting in a way that
indicates intent to be bound by it, such as continuing to make payments or using the
goods/services after turning 18.
3. Contracts for Necessaries:
Even though minors generally lack the capacity to contract, there are important exceptions:
o Necessaries are things that are essential for the minor's well-being, such as food,
clothing, shelter, and sometimes, medical treatment.
o A minor can be held liable for the reasonable value of necessaries provided to
them, even though they may not be legally bound to pay under a regular contract.
o The standard is often one of "necessity" and must be assessed in context (e.g., a
basic education course might be seen as a necessity, but a luxury item like a designer
jacket may not).

Example: A minor who enters into a contract to purchase groceries can generally be required
to pay for them, but a contract for luxury goods may not be enforceable against the minor.

4. Contracts of Employment:
Some contracts of employment made by minors are enforceable, especially if:
o The contract is beneficial to the minor (e.g., a contract for apprenticeship or
vocational training).
o Statutory exceptions exist in some jurisdictions that provide protections or allow
certain employment contracts for minors to be binding.

However, in cases where a minor works under a contract that exploits them or is unfair, the
minor has the option to disaffirm the contract.

5. Contracts for Education or Training:

Contracts that provide education or vocational training are often treated differently from
other contracts. They can sometimes be enforced even if the minor disaffirms them,
especially if the minor has already benefited from the training. Educational institutions may
be able to enforce contracts based on the minor’s use of educational services.

25 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

6. Misrepresentation of Age:
If a minor misrepresents their age and induces the other party to enter into a
contract, the minor can still disaffirm the contract, even if they lied about their age.
However, this varies depending on the jurisdiction. In some cases, a fraudulent
misrepresentation by the minor could lead to legal consequences, such as claims for
damages by the other party.
o In certain jurisdictions, the minor may not be able to disaffirm the contract if they
lied about their age or engaged in fraudulent behavior.
o Other jurisdictions allow the minor to disaffirm, but the other party might be
entitled to damages for the fraud or misrepresentation.

Example: A 17-year-old pretends to be 19 to purchase a car. Upon reaching 18, they decide
to return the car, and under the general rules, they may be able to cancel the contract.
However, the seller might be entitled to compensation for the fraudulent misrepresentation.

7. Effect of Parental Consent:

In some cases, parents or guardians may have the ability to provide consent to a contract
entered into by a minor. However, such consent might not always make the contract
enforceable if the minor has not yet reached the age of majority. Parents generally cannot
make the minor legally bound to contracts, but they may help guide the minor’s contractual
relations and might be liable in some circumstances.
8. Contracts of a Minor in Real Estate:
In many jurisdictions, contracts for the sale or purchase of real estate by a minor are either
void or voidable, which means they might not be enforceable. This is because the legal
obligations attached to real property transactions are considered too serious and binding to
be made by someone who lacks the capacity of majority.

Example: A 17-year-old buys a house using a loan. In most cases, the contract may be
voidable, and the minor could cancel the contract upon turning 18, with the lender unable to
enforce the loan without the minor’s consent.

9. Minor’s Right to Disaffirm Contracts:

o A minor has the right to disaffirm a contract before they reach the age of majority or
within a reasonable period after reaching the age of majority.
o However, disaffirmance can be restricted by specific statutes (e.g., contracts
involving non-refundable deposits, contracts for debts arising from necessaries, etc.).
o If a minor has received goods or services and cannot return them (e.g., they’ve
consumed or damaged the goods), some jurisdictions may require them to pay for
the value of what they received.

Implications of Minor's Contracts in Practice:

1. Risk for Sellers:

Sellers or service providers who contract with minors should be aware of the risk that the
minor could disaffirm the contract, leaving them with no recourse. It is important to assess
whether the contract is related to necessaries or if any protections or exceptions apply.
2. Enforcement Issues:
In practice, enforcing a contract with a minor can be difficult, as the minor may disaffirm it
at any point. As a result, parties entering into contracts with minors should proceed
cautiously, and in some cases, may require additional safeguards such as parental consent.

26 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Conclusion:

The position of a minor in contract law is built around the principle of protecting individuals who are
legally unable to fully understand the implications of entering into a binding agreement. While the
law provides flexibility in some areas, there is a general emphasis on preventing exploitation while
still ensuring that minors can enter into contracts for necessities or beneficial purposes.

Further Considerations of a Minor's Contractual Capacity

1. Minors and the Common Law vs. Statutory Law:

While the common law principle across many jurisdictions holds that contracts entered into by
minors are voidable, statutory exceptions often come into play. In some countries or states, the
legislature has created specific exceptions or expanded the rights of minors to enter into certain
contracts. These exceptions can vary significantly across regions, and as a result, the exact rules on
contracts with minors will depend on the relevant jurisdiction's statutes.

 Common Law: Traditionally, under common law, a minor could avoid most contracts unless
they were for necessaries.
 Statutory Modifications: Many jurisdictions have enacted laws that make minor's contracts
enforceable in certain cases. For example, the Contracts (Minors) Act 1987 in England and
Wales allows for more enforceability in non-necessity contracts if they are beneficial to the
minor. Similarly, some states in the U.S. have enacted laws permitting minors to enter into
enforceable contracts for specific purposes, like employment or student loans.

2. General Rules on "Necessaries":

The rule surrounding contracts for necessaries is one of the most significant exceptions to the
principle that minors' contracts are voidable. Necessaries are usually defined as goods or services
necessary for the minor's survival and welfare, which may include food, clothing, shelter, medical
care, and in some cases, education.

Key Points to Note:

 Reasonable Value: The minor is liable to pay the reasonable value for necessaries, which
doesn't necessarily mean the price agreed upon in the contract.
 Discretion of the Court: If a minor contracts for something that might be seen as a necessity
but is contested, a court may assess whether the item or service is indeed essential based on
the minor's situation.

Example:
A 17-year-old might sign a contract for a new winter coat. If the coat is essential for the minor’s well-
being due to cold weather and the lack of other clothing, the contract might be enforceable, and the
minor could be required to pay for the coat.

3. Minors in Business Transactions:

In some jurisdictions, if a minor engages in business or commercial transactions (such as running a

small business or acting as an entrepreneur), they may be treated differently than minors in
personal contracts. The courts might evaluate whether the contract benefits the minor’s business or
whether the contract is seen as a business necessity.

27 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Minors acting in business: When a minor operates a business or becomes a

businessperson (e.g., entering into contracts for business-related purchases or labor),
some laws allow those transactions to be enforced under commercial exceptions or assume
that the minor is acting as an adult in those specific transactions.

Example:
A 17-year-old opens a small café. If they enter into a lease agreement for the premises, in some
jurisdictions, the lease may be enforceable because the minor is conducting business in a manner
that is beneficial to their economic well-being.

4. Minors and Real Property Transactions:

A common area where a minor's contract is particularly scrutinized is when they enter into real
estate transactions. The law treats real property transactions (buying or selling land or real estate)
with more gravity, given the long-term nature of such contracts and the large financial
responsibility involved.

 Voidability: In most cases, real estate contracts made by minors are voidable at the minor's
discretion, and upon disaffirmation, the minor may not be obligated to fulfill the contract,
even if they’ve already received possession of the property.
 Equity Considerations: Some jurisdictions provide the option to seek equitable remedies
(like rescission or specific performance) when a minor enters into a real estate contract,
especially when third parties like banks or other minors are involved.

Example:
If a minor buys a house but later decides they do not want to keep the property, they may be able to
disaffirm the contract and return the house, as long as the contract is deemed voidable.

5. The Role of Guardians and Parental Approval:

A parent or legal guardian generally cannot make a binding contract for a minor, though they may
provide guidance or consent to the contract. In some cases, parental consent is required to validate
certain contracts, particularly those concerning real estate or major financial agreements.

 Contracts Requiring Parental Consent: In some jurisdictions, a minor may enter into a
contract with the consent of their parent or guardian. For example, contracts for school-
related activities or significant purchases (such as a car) may be considered binding with
proper parental approval.
 No Implied Liability for Guardians: Generally, a guardian or parent will not be personally
liable for the minor’s contracts unless they co-sign the contract or directly engage in the
contract.

6. Contractual Voidability and Limits on Disaffirmance:

While a minor generally has the right to disaffirm their contracts, there are important limitations to
this right:

 When Disaffirmance Is Not Allowed: In certain cases, a minor may not be able to disaffirm a
contract. For example:
o If the minor has misrepresented their age and caused fraud.
o If the contract is for necessaries, and the goods or services have been consumed.

28 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Restitution: If a minor has received goods or services and is now seeking to disaffirm
the contract, they generally must return the goods or services in the same condition.
If they cannot return the goods (e.g., the goods have been used up), they may still be
required to compensate the other party for the reasonable value of what was received.

Example:
A 16-year-old enters into a contract to buy a used car. After using the car for a few months, the
minor decides to disaffirm the contract. If the car is still in good condition, the minor may return it
for a refund. However, if the car has been damaged, the minor may only be entitled to a refund for
the depreciated value of the vehicle.

7. Misrepresentation and Fraud by Minors:

One area that can complicate minors’ contracts is fraudulent misrepresentation. If a minor
intentionally lies about their age or misrepresents key facts about the contract, this can lead to legal
consequences.

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation: If a minor misrepresents their age or intentionally deceives

the other party about their ability to contract, the contract could still be voidable, but the
minor could face consequences for fraud.
 Damages for Fraud: In some jurisdictions, the other party may be entitled to damages for
fraud committed by the minor, such as reimbursement for losses due to the
misrepresentation.

8. The Role of Equity in Contract Enforcement:

Courts sometimes exercise equitable powers to determine the fairness of a minor's contract,
especially in cases involving fraud, coercion, or undue influence. Courts might not always enforce a
contract strictly as written but might offer equitable relief, such as requiring the minor to
compensate for any damage caused by the breach of contract.

Real-World Example Scenario

 Scenario 1: Minor Entering a Lease Contract for a Car

A 17-year-old enters into a lease agreement for a new car. The contract states that the
minor is responsible for monthly payments, maintenance, and insurance. After reaching the
age of majority, the minor decides to disaffirm the contract and returns the car. Since cars
are typically non-necessaries in this case, the lease contract may be voidable. However, the
minor may be required to compensate the dealership for the value of any usage or damage
to the car during the lease period.
 Scenario 2: Minor Purchasing a Laptop on Credit
A minor buys a laptop on credit, but after turning 18, decides to disaffirm the contract. The
laptop, being a non-essential item, falls outside the "necessaries" exception. The minor may
cancel the contract, but if the laptop was used or damaged, they might have to pay for its
depreciated value.

29 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Conclusion:

The position of a minor in contract law is heavily influenced by the need to protect their interests
and prevent them from being taken advantage of due to their lack of experience. However, the law
does provide exceptions that ensure fairness in certain situations, particularly when the contract
involves necessaries or is beneficial to the minor. Understanding these nuances allows both minors
and the parties they contract with to navigate the complexities of contract law more effectively.

1. Minors' Contracts in Different Jurisdictions

While many of the rules about minors’ contracts are generally similar in common law jurisdictions,
there can be significant regional differences in how these rules are applied. These differences largely
stem from local statutory laws, court precedents, and legal reforms. Here’s a look at some of the
nuances in different jurisdictions:

A) United States:

In the U.S., the treatment of minors’ contracts can vary significantly from state to state. Most states
follow the common law principle that contracts entered into by minors are voidable at the minor's
discretion. However, some states have specific provisions that allow for more enforceability of
contracts in certain areas, like employment, real estate, or education-related contracts.

 Contracts for Necessaries: These are generally enforceable. Some states may allow for
minors to be liable for the reasonable value of the items or services they have received,
even if the minor didn’t consent to the contract.
 Contracts for Employment or Services: Many states allow minors to enter into employment
contracts, particularly if the work is seen as beneficial or for the minor’s future development
(such as apprenticeship contracts).
 Statutory Modifications: Some states have laws that limit a minor’s ability to disaffirm
contracts in certain cases, particularly regarding the purchase of real estate, motor vehicles,
or student loans. In these instances, the contracts may not be voidable or may have specific
disaffirmance conditions.

B) United Kingdom:

Under English contract law, the Contracts (Minors) Act 1987 modifies the common law position. The
Act provides that contracts made by minors are enforceable in certain circumstances, especially if
they are beneficial to the minor.

 Contracts for Necessaries: As in most other jurisdictions, contracts for goods and services
that are necessary for a minor’s well-being are enforceable.
 Contracts That Are Beneficial: A minor may be bound by a contract for something that is
beneficial to them, such as a contract for education or employment. If the minor benefits
from the contract (i.e., they gain an advantage), it could be binding even without the minor’s
full legal capacity.
 Exceptions: There are also exceptions for contracts that were previously ratified by the
minor once they reached the age of majority. The minor is treated as having given explicit or
implied consent to the contract once they turn 18.

30 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

C) India:

In India, minors (below the age of 18) are generally incapable of entering into enforceable contracts.
The Indian Contract Act, 1872 specifies that any contract entered into by a minor is void, except in
cases where it involves the purchase of necessaries.

 Minors’ Contracts Are Void: Similar to common law, a minor is considered legally incapable
of entering into a contract. The law provides that a contract entered into by a minor is
voidable and has no legal effect. This provision seeks to protect minors from exploitation.
 Exception for Necessaries: A minor may be bound by a contract if it involves the purchase of
necessaries, which may include food, clothing, and shelter, but even then, the minor can
only be required to pay the reasonable value.
 Minor’s Liability in Torts: In India, while the minor cannot be held liable for breach of
contract, they may still be held liable for tortious acts (e.g., negligence or fraud) committed
during the contractual relationship, provided they caused harm.

D) Australia:

Australian contract law, under the Australian Consumer Law and the Commonwealth Contracts Act,
also follows the basic principle that contracts made by minors are voidable. However, there are
certain exceptions and provisions that apply:

 Contracts for Necessaries: As with most legal systems, a minor is bound by contracts that
involve the purchase of necessaries and may be required to pay the reasonable value.
 Employment Contracts: Minors may also be able to enter into enforceable employment
contracts under Australian law if the employment is for the minor's benefit and consistent
with state or federal employment laws.
 Limited Disaffirmance: In some cases, Australian courts may not allow disaffirmance if the
contract has been ratified (for example, if the minor continues to perform the contract once
they turn 18).

2. Special Exceptions and Scenarios Where Contracts with Minors Are Enforceable

Let’s look at special cases where minors’ contracts might be enforceable or fall outside the normal
voidability rule:

A) Contracts Involving Real Estate:

 General Rule: As mentioned earlier, real estate contracts involving minors are typically
voidable, and the minor has the option to disaffirm the contract. However, this can be more
complicated when third parties, like banks, are involved.
 Mortgage Agreements: Some jurisdictions, like the U.S. or the U.K., may allow minors to
borrow money for the purpose of purchasing real property but may require parental
consent or have strict laws about minors' ability to engage in such transactions.

B) Contracts for Education or Vocational Training:

 Minors often enter into contracts for education (such as student loans or agreements for
vocational training) that are seen as beneficial or directly related to their future. In many

31 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

jurisdictions, such contracts may be treated as enforceable to allow the minor to

pursue career opportunities.
 Example: A minor enters into a contract with a technical school for a vocational training
program. In most cases, this contract would be enforceable because it is considered to be in
the minor’s best interest, helping them prepare for a career.

C) Online Transactions and E-Commerce:

 Minors in E-Commerce: The rise of online shopping and digital contracts has introduced new
challenges when minors engage in electronic transactions. Minors often click through
agreements online without parental oversight. In such cases, courts will typically invalidate
or modify contracts made by minors, especially when they do not involve necessities or are
unfair.
 Example: A 16-year-old buys digital goods or services (e.g., video games or subscriptions)
online. Depending on the jurisdiction, the minor may be able to disaffirm the contract and
seek a refund. However, issues arise with companies that rely on binding digital contracts,
and some may require parental consent.

D) Insurance Contracts:

 In some jurisdictions, minors are allowed to enter into certain insurance contracts (such as
life insurance) to benefit from coverage while still a minor. Such contracts might be
enforceable because they provide a benefit to the minor (like coverage for health or life).
 Example: A minor enters into an insurance contract for life or health insurance, and while
the contract might be voidable initially, the minor’s right to coverage and benefits may
prevent a full disaffirmance if it aligns with public policy.

3. Fraudulent Contracts and Misrepresentation by Minors

Fraud is an area where minors’ contracts can get complicated. While a minor generally has the right
to disaffirm a contract, fraudulent behavior can alter how courts view a minor’s disaffirmance
rights:

 Fraudulent Misrepresentation: If a minor intentionally misrepresents their age or engages

in fraud to induce another party into a contract, they may still be able to disaffirm the
contract but could be liable for damages. This ensures that minors are not unjustly enriched
or allowed to defraud other parties.
 Court’s Decision: Courts may, in certain situations, require that the minor return the goods
or compensate for damages caused by their fraudulent misrepresentation, especially when
the contract involved significant value or damage to the other party.

4. Emerging Issues: Minors and Digital Contracts

With the increasing use of technology, the issue of minors entering into digital contracts (like app
purchases, subscriptions, and virtual goods) is becoming more complex. Digital contracts pose
unique challenges because:

32 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Minors may click through agreements without understanding the terms, and the
contract is made instantly.
 Consumer protection laws vary by jurisdiction but often do not adequately address the
complexities surrounding digital contracts made by minors.

Example:

A 17-year-old subscribes to an online game platform and spends money on in-game purchases. After
turning 18, the minor might seek to disaffirm the contract, but the company could argue that the
transaction was valid under its terms of service. Many companies now require parental consent for
such transactions to ensure protection for minors in digital environments.

Conclusion:

The capacity of a minor to enter into contracts is a significant area of contract law, aiming to protect
minors from entering into potentially harmful or exploitative agreements. However, exceptions
exist, such as for contracts for necessaries or those that are beneficial to the minor, like education
or employment contracts. The law must balance the protection of minors' interests with their ability
to participate in certain legal agreements that contribute to their well-being and development.

33 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Agreements by Persons of Unsound Mind

Under contract law, the capacity of parties to enter into an agreement is a fundamental
requirement. In the case of persons of unsound mind, the capacity to form a contract is restricted.
Let's break it down:

1. Person of Unsound Mind:

A person is deemed to be of "unsound mind" if they are unable to understand the nature and
consequences of their actions due to mental incapacity. This includes people with mental illnesses,
cognitive impairments, or those experiencing temporary mental disorders (e.g., due to intoxication
or severe emotional distress).

2. Contracts Made by Persons of Unsound Mind:

 Voidable Contracts: In general, a contract made by a person of unsound mind is voidable at

their discretion. This means the person can choose to either enforce or void the contract.
 Mental Capacity at the Time of the Agreement: If a person was suffering from a mental
disorder at the time of making the contract and they could not understand the nature of the
contract or the consequences of their actions, the contract is voidable.
 Ratification: If a person who was mentally unsound at the time of entering into the contract
later regains soundness of mind, they may choose to ratify (confirm) the contract. In this
case, the contract becomes binding.
 Contracts for Necessaries: A person of unsound mind is still bound by contracts for
"necessaries" (e.g., food, clothing, medical treatment), similar to how contracts are treated
for minors. This ensures that basic needs are met even when a person is not in full control of
their faculties.

3. Test for Unsound Mind:

 Incapacity to Understand: The person must be unable to comprehend the nature of the
contract or the effects of their actions.
 Mental State at the Time: The mental state of the person at the time the contract was made
is crucial. For example, if a person was temporarily incapacitated, such as when intoxicated
or delirious, the contract may be voidable.
 Not a Blanket Rule: It’s not enough to simply prove that a person has a history of mental
illness; there needs to be evidence that at the time the contract was made, the person
lacked mental capacity.

4. Legal Protections:

 Guardianship: In cases where a person is consistently mentally incapacitated, a court-

appointed guardian or legal representative may be authorized to act on their behalf in legal
matters, including contracts.
 Mental Health Laws: Some jurisdictions have specific mental health or disability laws that
address the rights of persons of unsound mind in contract law.

34 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

5. Examples:

 Invalid Contract Example: A person suffering from severe dementia enters into a contract to
sell their house to another individual. Since they cannot comprehend the nature or effects of
this transaction, the contract may be considered voidable or invalid.
 Valid Contract Example: A person experiencing a brief episode of mental incapacity but later
recovering might ratify a contract they entered into during their mental state. However, this
is subject to the specific legal principles in the jurisdiction.

6. Exceptions:

 Mental Capacity Presumption: Some legal systems presume a person has mental capacity
unless proven otherwise. If someone claims to be of unsound mind, they must typically
provide evidence to prove their condition at the time of entering the contract.
 Contracts for Necessaries: A person of unsound mind may still be liable for contracts
regarding basic needs (e.g., food, shelter) even if they lack mental capacity.

Conclusion:

The law protects persons of unsound mind from being bound by contracts they cannot fully
understand, but it also ensures that they are not taken advantage of when it comes to their basic
needs. The specific rules can vary by jurisdiction, but in general, contracts made by persons of
unsound mind are either voidable or enforceable with certain conditions.

7. Categories of Mental Incapacity:

 Temporary Incapacity: A person may be temporarily mentally incapacitated due to illness,

intoxication, or another condition (such as fever or a breakdown). In such cases, the person
may not be able to understand the nature of the contract at that moment. The contract is
voidable only if the person was unable to comprehend the transaction when it was made,
and they can later ratify or rescind it once their mental capacity is restored.
 Permanent Incapacity: If a person has a permanent mental disorder (such as a chronic
mental illness or a disability), their ability to enter into binding contracts is more severely
restricted. In such cases, a guardian or legal representative may be appointed to act on their
behalf.

8. Effect of Unsound Mind on Contracts:

 Voidable Contracts: When a person who is mentally incapacitated enters into a contract, the
contract is typically voidable at the discretion of the person once they regain mental
soundness. If they choose not to void the contract after regaining capacity, it may remain
valid.
 Contracts for Necessaries: As mentioned earlier, contracts for necessaries (e.g., food,
medical services, clothing, shelter) are enforceable even if made by a person of unsound
mind. This prevents a person from being left without access to basic needs because of their
mental state.

9. Key Elements of Contract Validity in Cases of Unsound Mind:

 Mental Capacity: A key consideration is whether the person, at the time of contracting,
understood the nature of the contract and its consequences. If the person could not
35 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

understand or appreciate the terms of the contract due to a mental condition, the
contract is invalid.
 Restoration of Mental Capacity: If the person regains their mental faculties, they can either
ratify the contract or choose to disaffirm (invalidate) it. For example, if someone temporarily
loses capacity due to an illness but later recovers, they can review the contract and decide if
they want to uphold it.
 Void vs. Voidable: In some jurisdictions, the contract could be deemed “void” (completely
without legal effect) if a person was mentally incapacitated at the time of agreement, while
in others, it may be voidable (allowing the incapacitated person or their guardian to cancel
the contract).

10. Doctrine of "Necessaries":

 A person of unsound mind is still responsible for contracts related to essential goods or
services, commonly referred to as necessaries. These include things that a person needs to
live, such as food, clothing, medical care, and housing.
 Even though they might lack the ability to fully understand a contract, the law recognizes
that they need access to essential items, so contracts for those items are enforceable to
ensure their basic needs are met.
 The seller or service provider is typically entitled to be paid for the necessary goods or
services provided, even if the person lacks mental capacity.

11. Case Law Examples:

Jurisdictions may vary in how they handle cases involving persons of unsound mind, but there are
several notable case law principles that influence how these contracts are treated:

 Fisher v. Bell (1961): In the UK, the courts in cases involving mental incapacity often apply
the test of whether the person was "able to comprehend the nature and effect" of their
actions. In some cases, a contract made by a person who is mentally ill may be deemed
voidable if it is shown they did not understand the terms of the agreement.
 Imperial Loan Co. Ltd v. Stone (1892): In this case, the court held that a contract made by a
person who was mentally ill at the time was voidable at the person’s discretion. The claimant
was allowed to avoid the contract because they lacked mental capacity when the agreement
was made.

12. Role of Guardians:

 Guardianship and Trusteeship: In cases where a person is mentally incapacitated for a

prolonged period, they may have a guardian or trustee appointed to manage their affairs.
The guardian has the authority to enter into contracts on their behalf.
 Court Intervention: A court may intervene and appoint a legal guardian to oversee the
person’s financial and personal matters. The guardian's role is to act in the best interest of
the person under their care and to ensure that any contracts they enter into are valid and
beneficial to the person.

13. Impact of Unsound Mind in Different Jurisdictions:

 United States: In the United States, contract law generally follows the principle that
contracts entered into by persons of unsound mind are voidable. However, the person can
disaffirm (void) or affirm (ratify) the contract once they are of sound mind. Specific

36 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

exceptions exist for contracts for necessaries, and many states have varying rules
regarding when a contract is voidable or void.
 United Kingdom: In the UK, contracts entered into by persons who are mentally
incapacitated can also be voidable. However, a court may appoint a guardian or conservator
to manage the affairs of someone with a mental condition. There is also a strong focus on
protecting vulnerable individuals in contract law.
 India: Indian law follows a similar approach, where contracts made by a person of unsound
mind are voidable. The Indian Contract Act of 1872 specifically addresses the situation of
mental incapacity, allowing the contract to be annulled at the discretion of the person once
they regain their mental faculties.

14. Challenges and Criticisms:

 Proof of Mental Incapacity: One of the challenges in dealing with contracts involving persons
of unsound mind is proving mental incapacity. This often requires expert medical testimony
or psychological evaluations, which can complicate legal proceedings.
 Potential for Exploitation: There’s also a concern that individuals with mental health issues
may be taken advantage of by others who might seek to exploit their condition. Courts aim
to balance protecting vulnerable individuals while ensuring fairness in contractual
obligations.

15. Conclusion:

The legal framework around contracts made by persons of unsound mind emphasizes the
importance of mental capacity in determining the validity of contracts. While the law seeks to
protect individuals who may not fully understand the consequences of their actions, it also ensures
that people are not left without basic necessities and that contracts for essential goods or services
are enforceable. The rules regarding contracts made by mentally incapacitated individuals vary by
jurisdiction but generally focus on fairness, protection from exploitation, and safeguarding
vulnerable persons.

16. Mental Incapacity and Different Levels of Cognitive Function:

Mental incapacity can manifest in varying degrees, and this may affect the ability of a person to form
or understand contracts. Some key considerations are:

 Temporary vs. Permanent Mental Incapacity: As already mentioned, temporary incapacity

may be due to factors like intoxication, mental fatigue, or illness. A permanent mental
incapacity, such as that resulting from a brain injury or degenerative disease like
Alzheimer's, can more severely limit an individual’s capacity to form a valid contract. In both
cases, the contract may be voidable, but with permanent incapacity, a guardian or
conservator might be appointed to manage the person’s affairs.
 Cognitive Function Spectrum: Individuals with cognitive impairments, such as those on the
autism spectrum, intellectual disabilities, or conditions like schizophrenia, may not fully
comprehend the nature of a contract. However, if they have the mental capacity to
understand the specific terms of the contract, even if their understanding of other matters is
impaired, the contract could still be valid. The court typically assesses whether the person
comprehended the "nature" of the contract rather than requiring a comprehensive
understanding of all legal matters.

37 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

17. Contracts Involving Persons with Diminished Capacity:

In some cases, a person may have diminished capacity rather than being fully mentally
incapacitated. This might involve a person who understands the general nature of the contract but
has difficulty fully appreciating its implications.

 Undue Influence or Duress: Contracts entered into by persons of unsound mind are
vulnerable to claims of undue influence or duress. If a mentally incapacitated individual is
coerced or unduly pressured into entering a contract, it could be voided. The presence of
undue influence (e.g., manipulation by family members or other individuals) may be
considered a key factor in determining the contract's validity.
 Fairness of the Contract: Courts often assess whether the contract was fair and reasonable.
If the terms of the contract are grossly unfair or exploitative, the court may find the contract
to be voidable. This often happens when a person with a mental impairment is tricked into
signing an agreement they do not fully comprehend.

18. Contracts Made During Delirium or Intoxication:

 Temporary Mental Incapacity: Contracts made during a period of mental incapacity caused
by intoxication, fever, or a delirium are often voidable. A common example is when someone
signs a contract while heavily intoxicated but later claims they were unable to understand
the terms of the agreement at the time.
 Intoxication and Contracts: In legal systems like those in the U.S., a person under the
influence of drugs or alcohol can often invalidate contracts made during that time if they can
prove they were incapable of understanding the nature of the contract.
 Drunkenness and Mental Incapacity: Courts typically distinguish between someone who is
temporarily incapacitated due to intoxication and someone who has a permanent mental
condition. If intoxication was so severe that the person could not understand what they were
doing, the contract may be voidable.

19. Contracts for Personal Services or Employment:

 Employment Contracts: A person of unsound mind might also enter into an employment
contract or service agreement. If the person is unable to understand the nature of the
employment contract, it could be voidable. However, if the contract is for basic necessities or
essential services, the contract may still be enforceable (e.g., an employment contract for
basic care services).
 Personal Services Contracts: If the person of unsound mind is unable to fulfill the contract
(for example, due to their mental state), the contract could be terminated or voidable.
Employment or service contracts signed by a person who cannot understand the role or the
expectations may not be legally binding.
 Agency Contracts: If an agent acts on behalf of a person of unsound mind, the agency
relationship could be questioned if the principal (the person of unsound mind) was unable to
consent to the terms of the agency agreement due to mental incapacity.

20. Legal Tests for Mental Incapacity:

To assess whether a person lacked the mental capacity to enter into a contract, courts apply a test
of mental capacity. Some tests or criteria might include:

38 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Understanding of Nature and Consequences: Did the person understand that they
were entering into a contract and the likely consequences of that contract?
 Ability to Reason: Was the person able to reason logically and weigh the consequences of
their decision-making? If a person cannot follow this line of reasoning, it could be a strong
indication of mental incapacity.
 Standard of Proof: Evidence must be presented that the person’s mental state at the time of
the agreement prevented them from entering into a contract knowingly. This could involve
medical records, psychological evaluations, or testimony from experts on mental health.

21. Guardians and Legal Representatives:

As previously mentioned, when a person is consistently mentally incapacitated, a guardian or legal

representative may be appointed to act on their behalf. The guardian's role is to protect the
interests of the person under their care, which may include making contracts on their behalf.

 Guardian's Role in Contracting: Guardians have the authority to enter into contracts for the
benefit of the person they represent. For instance, if the person is incapable of managing
their finances, a guardian may sign contracts related to the sale or management of property.
 Court Approval: In some cases, a guardian may need court approval before entering into
significant contracts, particularly if the contract involves large sums of money or vital assets
of the person with mental incapacity.
 Power of Attorney: A person who is mentally sound but anticipates becoming incapacitated
in the future can designate someone through a Power of Attorney to make decisions for
them if they lose mental capacity. This agreement must be in place before mental incapacity
arises, and the designated person (agent) can act on behalf of the principal.

22. Capacity and Consent:

 Consent in Contract Law: In contract law, valid consent is a critical element of a legally
enforceable agreement. When a person lacks mental capacity, they cannot give proper
consent to a contract. This is why a contract entered into by someone of unsound mind is
voidable. The presence of consent or the lack thereof plays a critical role in assessing the
contract's validity.

23. Protection of Vulnerable Individuals:

 Mental Health Legislation: Many jurisdictions have mental health or capacity laws designed
to protect individuals who are mentally impaired from exploitation. These laws may require
that individuals who lack mental capacity receive specific protections, such as having legal
representation or a guardian, and ensure that contracts are made in their best interest.
 Consumer Protection Laws: There are often consumer protection laws that protect
individuals who may be mentally incapacitated from entering into exploitative contracts. For
example, unscrupulous businesses might try to take advantage of someone who cannot fully
understand the terms of a contract, and consumer protection laws aim to prevent this.

24. Contractual Disputes Involving Unsound Mind:

 Dispute Resolution: If a dispute arises regarding a contract entered into by a person of

unsound mind, it might require adjudication by a court. In such cases, the court will often
consider whether the individual had the capacity to understand the contract and whether
they were vulnerable to undue influence or fraud.

39 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Evidence of Mental Incapacity: As with any contract dispute, the burden of proof
falls on the person alleging mental incapacity. They must provide sufficient evidence
that the individual lacked the mental capacity to consent to the contract. This may involve
expert testimony, medical records, or personal observations of the individual's behavior.

25. Conclusion and Emerging Trends:

 Awareness and Legal Reforms: In many parts of the world, there is increasing awareness of
the challenges faced by people with mental disabilities or impairments in the legal system.
Legal reforms may continue to evolve to better protect these individuals in contractual
contexts and ensure that they are not taken advantage of.
 Evolving Case Law: Courts are increasingly becoming more attuned to the nuances of mental
incapacity, especially as society’s understanding of mental health issues deepens. Courts may
be more willing to set aside contracts where there is evidence of exploitation or undue
influence over vulnerable individuals.

The field of contract law continues to adapt to the complex reality of mental incapacity, emphasizing
fairness, protection, and respect for vulnerable individuals while also ensuring that the interests of
all parties involved are considered.

26. Mental Incapacity and Specific Types of Contracts:

 Real Estate Transactions: Real estate contracts are among the most significant types of
contracts people enter into, and mental incapacity can be a critical factor in determining
their enforceability. If a person who is mentally incapacitated enters into a real estate deal
(e.g., buying or selling property), the contract is voidable if it can be shown that the
individual did not understand the nature and consequences of the agreement.
o Example: If someone with advanced dementia agrees to sell their home for a price
far below market value, the sale might be contested on the grounds of mental
incapacity. If it can be shown that they did not understand the terms or the financial
implications, the contract could be voidable.
 Wills and Testamentary Capacity: In addition to contracts, wills and testamentary
documents (like trusts or powers of attorney) require mental capacity for validity. A person
who is mentally incapacitated cannot create a valid will unless they meet the legal criteria of
having the necessary mental capacity at the time the will is signed.
o Testamentary Capacity involves the understanding of one’s property, the natural
beneficiaries, and the nature of the will’s contents. If a person enters into a contract
(like a will) when they are of unsound mind, the will can be contested and
invalidated.
 Marriage Contracts: Marriage, in some legal systems, is considered a contract. If a person is
mentally incapacitated at the time of marriage, it could be argued that they lacked the
necessary mental capacity to understand the contract they entered into. This could affect
the validity of marriage, particularly in cases of arranged or forced marriages. If someone is
under the mental impairment that prevents them from understanding the union’s legal
nature, the marriage may be deemed invalid or voidable.
o Example: If a person with cognitive impairments is pressured or manipulated into
marriage, and they lack the understanding of what marriage entails, the contract
(marriage) could be challenged in court.

40 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

27. Role of Mental Health Professionals in Contract Disputes:

 Psychiatric Evaluations: In disputes regarding a person’s mental capacity, psychiatric

evaluations may be used to determine whether a person was of sound mind at the time of
the contract. These evaluations could come from medical professionals such as psychiatrists
or clinical psychologists, and their findings will often play a crucial role in the determination
of contract enforceability.
 Expert Witness Testimony: When mental incapacity is contested, expert witnesses, such as
mental health professionals, may testify about the individual’s mental state at the time of the
agreement. Their testimony can provide critical insight into whether the person was capable
of understanding the nature and consequences of the contract.

28. Principles of ‘Informed Consent’ and Contractual Agreement:

 Informed Consent: The principle of informed consent is a critical aspect of contract law and
especially relevant to individuals of unsound mind. Informed consent means that a person
fully understands the terms and effects of the contract they are entering into. For individuals
of unsound mind, informed consent may be impossible if they are not capable of
understanding the contract's nature or if they cannot weigh the consequences of their
actions.
o Example: If a person with schizophrenia signs a contract for a large financial
transaction but cannot comprehend the terms (e.g., due to delusional thinking or
hallucinations), they have not given informed consent, making the contract voidable
or unenforceable.
 Legal Capacity and the Doctrine of "Caveat Emptor": Under the principle of caveat emptor
(let the buyer beware), both parties in a contract are expected to be aware of the terms and
the consequences of their actions. However, this principle does not apply to persons of
unsound mind who cannot be expected to fully understand the nature of the transaction.
This means that a contract entered into by a person who is mentally incapacitated is subject
to greater scrutiny and may be voidable.

29. State-Specific Regulations on Mental Incapacity and Contractual Capacity:

 Differences in Jurisdictions: Contract laws regarding mental incapacity can vary greatly
depending on the jurisdiction. For example, the standards for determining whether a person
lacked mental capacity might differ from state to state in the United States or between
countries (e.g., the U.S., U.K., India, or Australia). Some jurisdictions may apply a stricter
standard of proof for mental incapacity, while others may consider mental illness more
broadly when determining a person’s capacity.
o Example: Some jurisdictions might recognize a "presumption of capacity" and
require the person alleging mental incapacity to provide evidence to the contrary.
Other areas might have statutes that automatically presume incapacity for
individuals with certain diagnosed mental health conditions, thus offering more
protection.
 Mental Health Laws and Regulations: In certain jurisdictions, additional laws regulate the
capacity of individuals to contract based on their mental health status. For instance, the
Mental Health Act in the U.K. allows for a person to be placed under a mental health order,
which may restrict their ability to enter into binding contracts. In the U.S., individuals with
certain disabilities may be eligible for protections under the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA), which could impact their contractual capacity.

41 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

30. Social and Ethical Considerations in Contract Law:

 Social Justice: From a social justice perspective, contract law must ensure that vulnerable
individuals are protected from being exploited due to their mental health or cognitive
limitations. There is growing concern about the ethical implications of allowing contracts to
stand when one party may not fully understand the terms or the consequences of their
actions.
o Example: If someone with a severe mental impairment is coerced into signing away a
significant portion of their savings or assets, it might lead to ethical questions about
the fairness of allowing such a contract to be enforced, even if the letter of the law
might support it.
 Capacity and the Right to Autonomy: On the other side of the debate is the concept of
personal autonomy, which asserts that mentally impaired individuals should still have the
right to enter into contracts and manage their own affairs, provided they are able to
understand the nature of the agreement. Some legal scholars advocate for a system where
individuals with mental disabilities have more control over their contracts, with more focus
on ensuring fairness rather than stripping them of the ability to make binding agreements.

31. Contract Modifications for Mentally Incapacitated Individuals:

 Modification or Termination of Contracts: In some cases, contracts made by a person of

unsound mind can be modified rather than completely voided. For example, if a mentally
incapacitated person enters into a lease agreement or service contract, the court might
allow modifications to make the terms more reasonable and fair, based on the person’s
mental state at the time of signing.
 Termination Based on Involuntary Guardianship: If a person has been assigned a legal
guardian due to their mental incapacity, the guardian may also have the right to terminate
or renegotiate contracts entered into by the individual. However, this must be done in
accordance with relevant legal standards and protections for the individual’s best interests.

32. The Role of the Courts in Upholding Fairness:

 Court's Discretion: Ultimately, courts have the discretion to determine the enforceability of
contracts involving persons of unsound mind, guided by principles of fairness, justice, and
protection. Courts will assess not only whether the person had mental capacity but also
whether the contract itself was exploitative or unfair, especially if undue influence or
coercion is involved.
o Example: In a case where a mentally incapacitated individual is tricked into signing a
highly unfavorable agreement, the court may void the contract, even if the individual
technically lacked the legal capacity to understand the agreement.

33. Potential for Abuse and Exploitation:

 Exploitation of Vulnerable Parties: In situations where a mentally incapacitated individual is

unable to comprehend the nature of a contract, there is always the potential for
exploitation by unscrupulous parties. For example, a person might be manipulated into
entering an agreement that is not in their best interest.
 Legal Safeguards: To prevent such exploitation, many legal systems have adopted
safeguards such as requiring contracts involving persons of unsound mind to be reviewed by
a legal representative or a third-party advocate before they can be enforced. Additionally,
some laws require certain contracts (e.g., real estate transactions) to be accompanied by

42 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

specific protections, such as written acknowledgment of the person’s capacity to

understand the agreement.

34. International Perspective on Mental Incapacity and Contract Law:

 Global Variations: Different countries have distinct approaches to how they handle
contracts made by persons of unsound mind. In countries like the U.K., the U.S., and
Australia, the approach involves protecting vulnerable individuals through legal frameworks
that focus on capacity and fairness. Other countries may have stricter or more lenient
standards, depending on their legal traditions and cultural attitudes toward mental health
and individual autonomy.
 United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: The UNCRPD (United
Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) recognizes the rights of
people with mental disabilities and calls for their legal capacity to be respected. In line with
the convention, some countries have begun making reforms to ensure that people with
mental disabilities can participate in contracts and legal matters more effectively, with
appropriate safeguards to prevent exploitation.

Conclusion: A Balanced Approach:

The issue of mental incapacity and contractual capacity is a delicate balance between protecting
vulnerable individuals and ensuring fairness in legal agreements. The law has developed safeguards
to prevent people of unsound mind from being exploited, but also provides mechanisms through
which they can regain legal capacity once they recover. It’s crucial that mental health considerations
are always factored into contract law, ensuring that people are not unfairly bound by agreements
they cannot understand.

43 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Persons Disqualified by Law

In contract law, a party's capacity to enter into a contract is an essential element for the contract's
validity. If a person lacks the legal capacity to contract, the contract may be voidable or
unenforceable. Various laws disqualify certain individuals or groups from entering into contracts due
to their particular status or condition. Here’s a breakdown of the key categories of persons who may
be disqualified by law from contracting:

1. Minors (Infants)

 Definition: A minor is typically someone under the age of majority, which is usually 18 in
many jurisdictions.
 Capacity to Contract: Contracts entered into by minors are generally voidable at the minor's
discretion. However, there are exceptions:
o Contracts for Necessaries: Minors can contract for items deemed necessary for their
welfare (e.g., food, shelter, clothing, medical care).
o Contracts for Employment: In some cases, minors may be allowed to contract for
employment or apprenticeship agreements.
 Reason for Disqualification: Minors are presumed not to have full maturity or understanding
to make binding decisions regarding contracts, which could lead to exploitation or unfair
agreements.

2. Mentally Incapacitated Persons

 Definition: Persons suffering from mental illness, intellectual disabilities, or other forms of
incapacity that impair their ability to understand the nature and consequences of their
actions.
 Capacity to Contract: Generally, contracts entered into by mentally incapacitated persons are
voidable. If they cannot comprehend the contract, it is considered unenforceable.
o Contract Voidability: If a person has been formally declared mentally incompetent
by a court, their contracts are typically voidable. If they regain mental capacity, they
may reaffirm or disaffirm previous contracts.
 Reason for Disqualification: The individual may not fully understand the implications of their
actions, leading to potential exploitation or unfair agreements.

3. Persons Under Influence of Drugs or Alcohol

 Definition: A person who is intoxicated or under the influence of drugs may lack the ability to
understand the nature of their contractual obligations.
 Capacity to Contract: Similar to mentally incapacitated persons, contracts entered into under
the influence of alcohol or drugs may be voidable. The person must prove that they were
unable to understand the nature and consequences of the contract due to intoxication.
o Voluntary Intoxication: In many legal systems, if intoxication is voluntary, it may be
harder to invalidate a contract.
o Involuntary Intoxication: If the person was involuntarily intoxicated (e.g., someone
forced to drink or take drugs), the contract may be voidable.

4. Convicts (Persons Under Certain Legal Restrictions)

 Definition: Persons who are serving sentences in prison or have been convicted of serious
crimes may face legal restrictions on their ability to contract.
44 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Capacity to Contract: Some jurisdictions impose restrictions on convicted criminals,

especially if their criminal activity involves fraud, dishonesty, or financial matters.
o Restrictions on Financial Transactions: For example, some jurisdictions may prevent
felons from engaging in certain types of business contracts.
 Reason for Disqualification: These restrictions are often imposed to prevent fraud or abuse,
especially where financial matters are involved.

5. Persons Disqualified by Statute

 Specific Legal Disqualifications: In addition to the general categories above, certain statutes
may disqualify specific persons from contracting. These disqualifications may apply to
individuals in specific occupations or circumstances.
o Bankruptcy: Individuals who are declared bankrupt may face restrictions on entering
into contracts related to financial obligations.
o Public Officials: Certain public officials may be prohibited from entering into
contracts that could lead to conflicts of interest.
o Foreign Nationals: In some cases, foreign nationals may face limitations in
contracting in certain jurisdictions based on immigration or foreign ownership laws.

6. Corporations and Legal Entities

 Definition: Corporations or other legal entities (e.g., partnerships, government bodies) have
a distinct legal capacity to contract.
 Capacity to Contract: However, these entities may face limitations based on their legal
structure, articles of incorporation, or authority of their representatives. A contract entered
into by someone who lacks the authority to bind the entity may be voidable.
o Ultra Vires Acts: If a corporation enters into a contract beyond its legal scope or
authority (an ultra vires act), it may be unenforceable.
o Failure to Follow Legal Requirements: If the required legal procedures (e.g., board
approval or shareholder consent) are not followed, the contract may be voidable.

7. Other Legal Restrictions

 Some jurisdictions impose specific legal restrictions based on social policy, such as
prohibiting contracts for illegal purposes (e.g., contracts for the sale of illegal drugs),
contracts with minors for certain types of goods or services, or contracts involving usury or
unconscionable terms.

Conclusion:

The legal capacity of individuals to enter into contracts is crucial to ensure fairness and protect
parties from exploitation or entering into agreements they do not fully understand. Laws exist to
prevent those who are vulnerable—such as minors, mentally incapacitated persons, and those under
the influence of drugs or alcohol—from entering into contracts that may not be in their best
interest. In some cases, these contracts are voidable or unenforceable, but there are exceptions
based on the type of contract and the necessity of goods or services.

8. Guardianship and Conservatorship

 Definition: In certain situations, an individual may have a guardian or conservator appointed

to manage their affairs due to mental incapacity or other reasons. This could apply to minors
45 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

who have guardians or to adults who are deemed legally incapable of managing their
own affairs.
 Capacity to Contract: A guardian or conservator typically has the legal authority to manage
the individual’s contracts and financial matters.
o For example, a guardian might be appointed for a minor, and the guardian has the
ability to enter into contracts on behalf of the minor, particularly when it concerns
necessities or financial management.
o Similarly, a conservator for an adult with mental incapacity may be authorized to
enter contracts on their behalf. Without the guardian or conservator’s approval, the
individual may not have the capacity to bind themselves in legal agreements.

9. Contracts of Necessaries

 Definition: Necessaries are essential goods and services required for a person's basic well-
being, including food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and education.
 Special Capacity Rule: Minors, and in some cases incapacitated persons, can enter into
contracts for necessaries even if they are otherwise disqualified from entering into contracts.
In such cases, the contracts are valid and enforceable because the goods or services are
deemed essential for their welfare.
o Example: A 17-year-old minor purchasing a phone for communication needs or a
hospital providing medical treatment to an incapacitated individual would likely not
be able to void the contract, as these are considered necessities.

10. Disqualification Based on Age or Status (Specific Contracts)

 Certain Age or Status-Based Restrictions: Some legal systems impose specific age or status-
based disqualifications for entering certain types of contracts, even if the individual
technically has the capacity to contract in other contexts. For example:
o Alcohol and Gambling Contracts: In most jurisdictions, persons under a certain age
(usually 18 or 21) are prohibited from engaging in contracts related to alcohol
purchases, gambling, or the acquisition of certain controlled substances.
o Marriage Contracts: In some jurisdictions, the legal capacity to marry may be
restricted to individuals of a certain age or legal status. A minor seeking to marry
may require parental consent or court approval.
o Employment Restrictions: Minors may be restricted from entering into employment
contracts in some industries (e.g., hazardous work), or certain industries may require
specific licensing, such as for doctors, lawyers, or accountants, which require certain
age and experience requirements.

11. Mental Competency and Diminished Capacity

 General Rule: A person who is mentally incompetent due to a disability or illness is generally
considered unable to enter into contracts unless they can demonstrate that they fully
understand the nature of the contract they are entering into.
 Diminished Capacity: Some individuals may have limited mental ability or understanding of
contracts but are not completely incapacitated. In such cases, the contract may be voidable
if they were unable to understand the nature and consequences of the agreement at the
time of its formation.
o Testamentary Capacity: A related concept is testamentary capacity in the context of
wills. An individual who does not have sufficient mental capacity to understand the

46 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

nature of their assets or the consequences of their decisions may be

disqualified from creating a valid will.
 Mental Competency Example: A person who has suffered a stroke and is temporarily unable
to fully understand their surroundings may be considered to have diminished mental
capacity. If they enter into a contract during this time, the contract may be challenged based
on lack of mental competency.

12. The Role of Guardians, Attorneys, and Powers of Attorney

 Guardianship and Representation: When an individual lacks mental capacity, they may be
represented in legal matters by someone with the authority to act on their behalf, such as a
guardian, conservator, or an attorney-in-fact. In these situations, the guardian or attorney
can enter into contracts for the individual, but they may have specific limitations under the
law.
 Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA): A Durable Power of Attorney allows a person to appoint
someone to act on their behalf in the event of mental incapacity, and the attorney-in-fact
can enter contracts within the scope of authority granted.
o Example: A person may assign a power of attorney to a trusted individual, such as a
family member, to make financial decisions for them if they become incapacitated
due to illness or injury. The attorney-in-fact can then enter into contracts as needed,
but only within the boundaries of the authority granted.

13. Other Considerations in Contract Law:

 Public Policy and Legal Prohibitions: Even if a person has the legal capacity to contract,
contracts that violate public policy or are illegal in nature may still be unenforceable.
o Example of Illegal Contracts: A contract to sell illegal drugs, or a contract to commit
a crime, would be considered void and unenforceable, even if all parties had the
capacity to contract.
 Contracts with a Minor’s Parent or Guardian: In some cases, a minor may need their parent
or guardian to co-sign or approve certain contracts, especially when the contract involves a
significant financial obligation.
 Enforceability of Contracts Made Under Duress or Undue Influence: In certain cases, even if
a person technically has the capacity to contract, the enforceability of the contract may be
called into question if the individual was coerced, under undue influence, or acted in a way
that did not reflect their true will.

14. Contracts in Specific Industries or Professions:

 Professional Licensing and Certification: Certain professions or industries require specialized

licenses or certifications, and individuals who are not licensed may be disqualified from
entering into contracts related to that profession.
o Example: A person who is not licensed to practice law cannot legally bind a client to
a contract to provide legal services, and any such contract may be unenforceable.
 Commercial Contracts and Capacity: In commercial contracts, there may be specific rules
governing who can bind a company or corporation to agreements. Individuals signing
contracts on behalf of a company must have authority, or the contract may be voidable.

47 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Conclusion:

The legal capacity of parties to enter into contracts ensures that parties are making informed and
voluntary decisions when entering into legally binding agreements. The law takes into account
various factors that might impair an individual’s ability to understand or consent to a contract, such
as age, mental capacity, and influence by drugs or alcohol. By disqualifying certain individuals from
contracting, the law seeks to protect vulnerable parties and maintain fairness in contractual
relations. Additionally, specific legal restrictions may apply depending on the nature of the contract
and the status of the individual involved.

15. Presumption of Competence and the Burden of Proof

 Presumption of Competence: In most legal systems, there is a presumption that all adults
are competent to contract unless proven otherwise. This means that the law assumes that
an adult has the legal capacity to enter into a contract unless there is substantial evidence to
suggest that they lack capacity due to mental incapacity, intoxication, or other reasons.
 Burden of Proof: If a party seeks to challenge the validity of a contract based on a lack of
capacity, the burden of proof typically lies on the party who asserts that the other party was
legally incompetent when the contract was formed.
o Example: If a person who entered into a contract is later challenged on the grounds
of being mentally incapacitated, it is up to that person (or their legal representative)
to provide evidence of their incapacity at the time the contract was signed.

16. Contracts by Power of Attorney

 General Power of Attorney: This is a document that grants a person (the "attorney-in-fact")
the power to make legal decisions on behalf of another individual. It’s usually used when the
principal (the person granting the power) is unable to make decisions themselves due to
illness or other reasons.
 Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA): Unlike a general power of attorney, which may
terminate if the principal becomes incapacitated, a Durable Power of Attorney remains
effective even if the principal becomes mentally incapacitated.
o Example: A person in a coma may have granted a durable power of attorney to a
family member, who could enter into contracts for the person’s care or financial
matters on their behalf.

17. Partial Mental Incapacity

 Diminished Capacity: A person may not be entirely incapacitated, but they might have
limited capacity due to mental illness, aging, or intellectual impairment. In such cases, the
law recognizes partial mental capacity, where the contract may still be enforceable if the
individual understood the basic nature of the contract.
 Contract Enforceability: In some cases, contracts made by individuals with partial mental
incapacity can be challenged, but they will not automatically be voided. The specific
circumstances, such as the severity of the incapacity and the nature of the contract, are
factors considered in determining enforceability.
o Example: An elderly person suffering from early-stage dementia might enter into a
contract to sell their property. If the dementia did not prevent them from
understanding the sale, the contract may still be valid. If it can be shown that they
did not fully comprehend the nature of the transaction, the contract could be voided
or modified.

48 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

18. Contracts for Illegal Purposes

 Illegality in Contracts: A contract is void and unenforceable if it involves an illegal purpose or

if it is contrary to public policy. Even if both parties have the capacity to contract, the law will
refuse to enforce contracts that violate the law.
 Examples of Illegal Contracts:
o Contracts for criminal activities: A contract for the sale of illegal drugs or for money
laundering would be deemed void.
o Contracts with an immoral purpose: In some jurisdictions, contracts made for
immoral purposes, even if not necessarily illegal, may be voidable. For instance, a
contract to hire someone to cheat in a competition could be deemed unenforceable.
 Effect of Illegality: Even if both parties have the mental capacity to contract, courts will
refuse to enforce agreements that are against public policy, such as those involving illegal
activities.

19. Contracts Involving Fraud and Misrepresentation

 Fraudulent Contracts: A contract entered into under fraud—where one party knowingly
misrepresents material facts to induce the other party to enter into the contract—can be
considered voidable at the discretion of the defrauded party. This is an issue of intentional
deception, not a lack of capacity.
o Example: If one party falsely claims they own property that they are selling, the
buyer may have the option to void the contract based on fraudulent
misrepresentation.
 Misrepresentation: Unlike fraud, misrepresentation may occur unintentionally but still affect
the validity of a contract. If a person is misled into entering a contract because of false
information, they may have a legal claim to rescind the contract, even if both parties
technically have the capacity to contract.

20. Contracts Made Under Duress or Undue Influence

 Duress: A contract made under duress is one that is entered into under threat, force, or
coercion. The party who is under duress may argue that they lacked the free will to enter
into the contract, making it voidable.
o Example: A person who is forced to sign a contract under threat of violence or
economic harm could later challenge the contract on the basis of duress.
 Undue Influence: This occurs when one party has significant power or influence over
another, and uses that power to unfairly coerce the weaker party into a contract.
o Example: A person in a vulnerable position, such as an elderly individual or someone
in a dependent relationship (e.g., caregiver or family member), may be unduly
influenced to sign a contract in a way that they wouldn’t have if they were acting
freely. Such contracts are often voidable.

21. Minors and Parental Consent

 Contracts Made by Minors: While contracts made by minors are generally voidable, some
jurisdictions allow parental consent to make certain contracts enforceable.
o Example: A minor may sign a contract to buy a car, but if the parent or legal guardian
consents, the contract may be binding.
 Exceptions for Minors: Certain contracts, such as those for employment, education, or
necessaries, are typically enforceable even without parental consent. These exceptions are

49 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

rooted in the need to protect minors while also allowing them to engage in necessary
activities.

22. Corporate Contracts and Authority to Bind

 Authority of Corporate Representatives: In corporate law, the authority to enter into

contracts on behalf of a company is often limited to certain individuals, such as officers or
directors.
o Ultra Vires Acts: A contract entered into by a corporate officer or employee who
lacks the necessary authority may be considered ultra vires (beyond their powers)
and unenforceable, even if the other party to the contract was acting in good faith.
o Ratification: In some cases, if an unauthorized contract is entered into, the
corporation may ratify it (approve it after the fact), thus making the contract
enforceable.
o Example: If a corporate employee signs a contract without the necessary approval
from the board, the company may choose to ratify the contract, making it
enforceable. Otherwise, the company can void it.

23. Voidable Contracts and the Right to Disaffirm

 Voidable Contracts: Some contracts are considered voidable, meaning that the party lacking
capacity (such as a minor, mentally incompetent individual, or person under duress) can
choose to affirm or disaffirm the contract. If the party who lacked capacity disaffirms the
contract, it is treated as though it never existed.
o Disaffirmation: The party who lacks capacity must act promptly and unequivocally to
disaffirm the contract. This must be done while they still lack capacity or within a
reasonable period after regaining it.
o Example: A minor who buys a car may choose to disaffirm the contract by returning
the car and getting their money back, provided they act before they reach the age of
majority or soon after they become competent.

24. Contracts of Adhesion (Standard Form Contracts)

 Definition: A contract of adhesion is a standardized contract prepared by one party (usually

a company or organization) and presented to the other party (usually a consumer) on a take-
it-or-leave-it basis. These contracts often have little to no negotiation room.
 Capacity Issues: If a person enters into a contract of adhesion and later claims they did not
fully understand the terms, courts may apply special rules to protect the vulnerable party,
especially if the contract contains unconscionable terms or is unfair.
o Example: A consumer who signs an online service agreement without fully reading
the terms may later argue that the contract was unfair or that they lacked the
capacity to understand it. Courts might find the terms unenforceable if they are
deemed excessively one-sided or hidden in fine print.

Conclusion:

Capacity in contract law is a multifaceted concept that involves assessing a person’s ability to
understand the consequences of entering into a contract. Legal systems aim to protect those who
might lack full mental capacity, such as minors or individuals with mental health issues, while also
ensuring that individuals cannot escape contractual obligations based on convenience or
misunderstanding. The law provides various exceptions, such as contracts for necessities or those

50 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

made by minors with parental consent, while also addressing issues of fraud, duress, and
undue influence that can affect the enforceability of contracts. Understanding these nuances
is critical for determining the validity and enforceability of a contract in any given situation.

25. Mental Capacity and the Test for Mental Competency

 Test for Mental Competency: When a party’s mental competency is in question, courts
generally assess whether the individual had the ability to understand the nature and effect of
the contract at the time it was formed. This typically involves considering whether the
person could comprehend:
o The nature of the transaction.
o The effect of entering into the contract.
o The potential consequences of their actions.
 Evidence of Mental Incapacity: The standard of evidence to prove mental incapacity may
include medical records, testimony from mental health professionals, or observations about
the individual’s behavior at the time of contracting.
o Example: A person with severe dementia may be unable to recognize the nature of a
property sale. If this is demonstrated, their contract could be voided based on their
lack of capacity to understand the sale’s consequences.

26. Intoxication and Contract Enforceability

 Intoxication: As noted earlier, a person who is under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the
time of contracting may lack capacity. However, the law does not automatically void
contracts made by intoxicated individuals—intoxication must be so severe that the person
was unable to understand the nature of the contract.
 Test for Intoxication: Courts typically evaluate whether the person could comprehend the
nature of the transaction. If a person was only mildly intoxicated but still understood the
contract’s basic terms, the contract is likely to be enforceable.
 Example: A person who is slightly intoxicated but still agrees to a straightforward sale of a car
may not be able to claim the contract is voidable. On the other hand, someone severely
intoxicated to the point of unconsciousness may void the contract.

27. Contracts for Necessaries and Unconscionability

 Necessaries and Exceptions: As previously mentioned, minors and persons with certain
disabilities can enter into contracts for necessaries, which are things essential to their well-
being. However, even in these cases, the terms of such contracts must be reasonable.
 Unconscionable Contracts: A contract is unconscionable if it is so one-sided that it shocks
the conscience. This often applies in the case of adhesion contracts, or contracts where
there is an overwhelming imbalance of bargaining power.
 Judicial Protection Against Unconscionability: Courts can invalidate unconscionable
contracts, even if both parties have the capacity to contract, in order to protect parties from
unfair exploitation.
o Example: A minor could potentially be protected if a retailer sells them an item of
great value (like a car) at an excessively inflated price, arguing that the contract is
unconscionable due to the price disparity.

51 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

28. Effect of Lack of Capacity on Third Parties

 Innocent Third Parties: When a contract is entered into by someone without capacity (e.g., a
minor), the contract may be voidable, but what happens to third parties who deal with the
individual?
 Good Faith and Without Knowledge: If a third party enters into a contract with someone
lacking capacity but does so in good faith and without knowledge of the other party’s
incapacity, the contract may be enforceable against them. This is typically considered in the
context of protecting innocent third-party interests.
 Example: If a minor enters into a contract for the purchase of goods and the seller is
unaware of the minor’s age, the minor can disaffirm the contract, but the seller may not be
able to recover the goods unless they prove the minor misrepresented their age.

29. Incapacity in Professional and Commercial Contracts

 Capacity in Professional Contexts: Certain professions have their own legal requirements
regarding capacity. For example:
o Lawyers, Doctors, Accountants, etc.: Professionals in regulated industries often must
meet qualifications, such as licensing and competency exams, to practice lawfully. If
an individual does not hold the necessary qualifications, they may not have the legal
capacity to enter into contracts within that professional sphere.
 Corporate Capacity: Corporations, which are separate legal entities, can only contract within
the scope of their legal powers as established in their articles of incorporation. Employees or
officers must have the authority to bind the corporation to a contract. If they exceed this
authority (acting beyond the scope of their powers), the contract may be voidable.
o Ultra Vires: Contracts that are outside the corporation's scope (ultra vires contracts)
may not be enforceable.
o Example: A manager of a corporation who is not authorized by the company to sign
a contract for a multi-million-dollar transaction might find the contract
unenforceable, even if they believed they had the power to sign.

30. Capacity and Duress

 Duress: Duress occurs when one party is forced into a contract through wrongful threats,
coercion, or pressure, depriving the victim of free will. A contract signed under duress is
voidable at the discretion of the coerced party.
 Types of Duress: Duress can involve threats of physical harm, financial harm, or the unlawful
use of pressure to compel someone to act.
o Physical Duress: Forcing someone to sign a contract at gunpoint or threatening
violence.
o Economic Duress: Forcing someone to enter into a contract by threatening to
withhold essential payments, such as wages or needed resources.
o Example: A business owner might sign a contract with a vendor threatening to
endanger their business if they don’t agree to unfavorable terms. This could be
deemed a contract made under duress.

31. Undue Influence and Exploiting Vulnerable Parties

 Undue Influence: This occurs when one party exerts excessive influence over another,
especially when there is an unequal relationship (such as between a caregiver and an elderly
person or between a lawyer and a client).

52 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Vulnerable Individuals: Parties who are in a weakened state (such as due to age,
illness, or emotional distress) may be particularly susceptible to undue influence.
o Example: An elderly person with diminished mental capacity may sign a will or
contract that heavily favors a caregiver or family member who has been exerting
influence over them.
 Legal Protections: Courts may scrutinize contracts entered into under such circumstances
and may find them voidable if undue influence is proven. The relationship between the
parties and the nature of the contract are critical factors.

32. Capacity and International Contracts

 Differences in Legal Systems: The concept of capacity to contract varies significantly

between legal systems. Some countries may have a different age of majority, and their legal
systems may impose stricter rules on certain individuals or groups (e.g., minors or mentally
incapacitated persons).
 International Treaties and Commercial Agreements: In international contracts, where the
laws of two or more countries intersect, questions of capacity and enforcement may become
complex. The international law governing such contracts often incorporates principles of
comity (respect for other nations' laws) and often requires that a contract is formed in good
faith and follows the public policy rules of the jurisdiction in which it is enforced.
o Example: A minor in one country might not have the legal capacity to enter into a
contract, but in another country, the age of majority might be 21. Courts in the
jurisdiction enforcing the contract must navigate the different legal systems to
determine enforceability.

33. Corporate Personality and Capacity of Shareholders

 Corporate Personality: Corporations have a separate legal personality from their

shareholders, officers, and employees. This means they can enter into contracts, sue, and be
sued independently of the individuals who own or manage them.
 Shareholder Contracts: While a shareholder has the right to vote and influence corporate
decisions, they do not typically have the capacity to bind the corporation to contracts unless
they hold a particular position or authority within the company.
 Example: A shareholder in a company may sign a contract, but the company would not be
bound by that contract unless the shareholder was authorized to act on behalf of the
company, such as in the capacity of a CEO or authorized officer.

34. The Role of Common Law and Equity in Capacity Issues

 Equitable Relief: While common law provides general principles on contract capacity, equity
(the branch of law dealing with fairness) also plays a significant role in situations where
individuals with limited capacity may need protection.
 Equitable Contracts: Courts of equity may intervene to prevent a contract from being
enforced if they determine that the party seeking to enforce it took advantage of the other
party’s incapacity. This is often seen in the context of unconscionable contracts or when
dealing with individuals who are under duress or undue influence.
o Example: A court may refuse to enforce a contract if it determines that one party
took advantage of a vulnerable individual’s mental incapacity, regardless of whether
the other party was unaware of the incapacity.

53 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

35. Rescission and Restitution

 Rescission: If a contract is found to be voidable due to the incapacity of one party, rescission
allows the aggrieved party to cancel the contract and return to the status quo. This involves
undoing the contract as if it never existed.
 Restitution: In some cases, when a contract is rescinded due to incapacity, the courts may
require restitution to return any benefits exchanged under the contract, such as returning a
property, money, or services received.
o Example: If a minor enters into a contract to purchase a car, and then disaffirms the
contract, the seller may be required to return any money the minor paid, while the
minor must return the car.

Conclusion:

The concept of contract capacity is complex, involving several nuances and exceptions. Mental
capacity, intoxication, undue influence, and duress are all key factors that can impact the validity of
a contract. Legal systems also take into account public policy considerations, professional
standards, and international contexts when assessing the enforceability of contracts.

54 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Types of Contracts and Essentials of Valid Contracts – Offer

Contract law governs the creation, execution, and enforcement of agreements between parties. For
a contract to be legally binding, certain criteria must be met, including the capacity of the parties
involved.

1. Capacities of Parties

The legal capacity of parties refers to their ability to enter into a contract. Not all individuals have
the same capacity. The basic rules are:

 Age: In most jurisdictions, the contracting party must be at least 18 years old to have full
capacity. Minors (under 18) typically cannot form binding contracts unless they are for
necessities (e.g., food, shelter) or the contract is ratified when they reach adulthood.
 Mental Capacity: A person must be of sound mind to enter into a contract. This means the
individual must understand the nature of the contract and its consequences. Individuals who
are mentally incapacitated or under the influence of drugs or alcohol may not have the
capacity to contract.
 Legal Authority: Certain individuals or entities, such as corporations, may only contract
through authorized representatives or agents. In the case of a corporation, the contract
must be executed within the powers granted to the corporation.
 Intoxication: If a party is intoxicated, they may not have the capacity to form a valid contract
unless it is proven that they understood the contract's nature and consequences at the time.

Types of Contracts

Contracts can be classified in several ways, depending on their formation, performance, and
enforceability. Here are some types:

1. Bilateral Contracts

A bilateral contract involves two parties making promises to each other. For example, if one party
agrees to sell a car and the other party agrees to buy it, the promises of both parties form a bilateral
contract.

2. Unilateral Contracts

A unilateral contract is where one party makes a promise in exchange for the performance of an act
by another. For example, if someone promises to pay a reward for the return of a lost pet, the
contract is unilateral because the promise is made contingent upon the other party’s action.

3. Express Contracts

An express contract is one where the terms are clearly stated, either orally or in writing, at the time
of the agreement.

55 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

4. Implied Contracts

An implied contract is formed by the behavior or conduct of the parties, even if there is no written
or spoken agreement. For example, if you go to a restaurant and order food, an implied contract
exists that you will pay for the meal.

5. Executed Contracts

These are contracts where both parties have fully performed their obligations under the contract.

6. Executory Contracts

These are contracts where one or both parties still have obligations to perform.

Essentials of Valid Contracts

For a contract to be valid and enforceable, the following essential elements must be present:

1. Offer
o One party must make a clear offer to another party. This offer can be either oral,
written, or implied, but it must be definite and communicated to the other party.
2. Acceptance
o The offer must be accepted by the party to whom it was made. The acceptance must
be unequivocal and communicated to the offeror.
3. Consideration
o Consideration refers to the value that is exchanged between the parties, typically
something of value such as money, services, or goods. Both parties must provide
consideration for the contract to be legally binding.
4. Intention to Create Legal Relations
o Both parties must intend for the contract to have legal consequences. Social or
domestic agreements generally lack this intention, meaning they are not
enforceable.
5. Capacity to Contract
o As mentioned above, the parties must have the legal capacity to enter into the
contract. This includes being of sound mind and of the appropriate age.
6. Legality of Object
o The subject matter of the contract must be legal. Contracts involving illegal activities
or objectives are void.

Offer

An offer is the first step in the creation of a contract. It is an indication of a willingness to enter into a
contract on specific terms, made with the intention of becoming legally bound once accepted by the
other party.

 Essential Elements of an Offer:

o Definiteness: The terms of the offer must be clear and specific.

56 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

o Intention: The offeror must intend to create a legal obligation once the offer
is accepted.
o Communication: The offer must be communicated to the offeree, so they are aware
of it and can decide whether to accept or reject it.
 Types of Offers:
o Unilateral Offer: A promise in exchange for a specific act.
o Bilateral Offer: A promise in exchange for a promise.
 Termination of an Offer:
o Revocation: The offeror can revoke the offer before it is accepted.
o Rejection: The offeree rejects the offer.
o Lapse of Time: If the offer is not accepted within a reasonable time, it expires.
o Death or Insanity: If either party dies or becomes mentally incapacitated before the
offer is accepted, the offer is void.

Offer in More Detail

The offer is a fundamental part of contract formation. It is the proposal made by one party (the
offeror) to another party (the offeree), with the intention to create a legally binding agreement once
the offer is accepted.

Key Elements of an Offer:

1. Clear and Definite Terms:

o An offer must be clear and specific, outlining the terms of the agreement in detail.
Vague or ambiguous terms do not constitute an offer.
o Example: "I will sell you my car for $10,000" is a clear offer. "I might sell you my car"
is too vague to be an offer.
2. Intent to Create Legal Relations:
o The offeror must have the intention to form a contract that is legally binding. Offers
made in jest, or during social or domestic situations, typically do not intend legal
consequences and thus are not legally enforceable.
o Example: A promise made by friends to meet up is generally not enforceable, as it
lacks the intention to create legal relations.
3. Communication of the Offer:
o The offer must be communicated to the offeree. Until the offeree is aware of the
offer, they cannot accept it.
o Example: If an individual makes an offer to sell a car but does not communicate it to
anyone, no one can accept that offer.

Types of Offers:

 Unilateral Offer: An offeror promises something in return for a specific action, rather than a
promise. For example, "I will pay $100 to anyone who finds and returns my lost dog."
 Bilateral Offer: A promise made by the offeror in exchange for a promise from the offeree. It
is the most common form of offer, like "I will sell you my car for $10,000, and you agree to
buy it for that price."

57 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Acceptance

Once the offer is made, the offeree must accept the offer for a contract to form. Acceptance is the
final agreement to the offer’s terms and can occur in several ways.

Key Points About Acceptance:

1. Unconditional Acceptance:
o Acceptance must mirror the terms of the offer exactly. Any changes or additions to
the terms constitute a counter-offer, not an acceptance.
o Example: If someone offers to sell a car for $10,000 and the offeree responds, "I will
buy the car for $9,000," this is a counter-offer, not acceptance.
2. Communication of Acceptance:
o Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror. Silence, in most cases, does not
constitute acceptance unless previously agreed upon.
o Example: If someone offers to sell a car, and you silently agree to the terms, this
does not automatically form a contract unless your silence is deemed as acceptance.
3. Methods of Acceptance:
o Express Acceptance: Acceptance communicated in words, whether written or
spoken.
o Implied Acceptance: Acceptance inferred by conduct. For example, beginning to
perform the requested act without expressing acceptance verbally.
4. Time Frame for Acceptance:
o An offer remains open for a reasonable period, or until the offeror revokes it. Offers
can be revoked anytime before acceptance, except when an option contract exists
(an offer supported by consideration for keeping it open for a specified period).

Consideration

Consideration is another essential element of a valid contract. It refers to something of value

exchanged between the parties involved.

Key Points About Consideration:

1. Definition: Consideration is the benefit or value each party gains from the contract. It is the
price for which the promise of the other is bought.
o Example: In a contract to sell a car, the consideration is the money (e.g., $10,000)
that the buyer pays in exchange for the car.
2. Adequacy of Consideration: Courts do not typically assess the adequacy of consideration
(whether the amount is fair or reasonable), but only whether something of value has been
exchanged.
o Example: If someone sells a car worth $20,000 for $5,000, the contract is still valid,
even if the price seems disproportionate.
3. Past Consideration: Consideration must be present or future, not past. A promise made in
exchange for something already done is not valid.
o Example: If a friend promises to pay you $100 for a favor you did last week, there is
no valid consideration because the act was completed before the promise.
4. Types of Consideration: Consideration can be in the form of money, property, services, or
an act of forbearance (not doing something one has the legal right to do).
58 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Intention to Create Legal Relations

For a contract to be legally binding, both parties must intend to enter into a relationship with legal
consequences.

 Commercial Agreements: Typically, it is assumed that commercial agreements (e.g.,

business contracts, contracts for the sale of goods) are meant to have legal consequences.
o Example: A business agreement to supply goods is legally binding.
 Social or Domestic Agreements: In contrast, agreements made in social or family settings
typically do not have the intention to create legal relations.
o Example: If two friends agree to meet for dinner, it is usually not legally binding.

Legality of Object

The subject matter of the contract must be legal and not go against public policy. If the contract’s
purpose is illegal, the contract is void and unenforceable.

Examples of Illegal Contracts:

1. Contracts for Illegal Activities: Any contract involving illegal activities, such as drug dealing
or human trafficking, is void.
2. Contracts against Public Policy: Contracts that restrict freedom or undermine public order
are also unenforceable, even if they are not explicitly illegal.

Termination of an Offer

An offer can be terminated in several ways, before it is accepted:

1. Revocation: The offeror can revoke the offer at any time before acceptance. However, if the
offeror has promised to keep the offer open for a certain period, they cannot revoke it
before that period expires.
o Example: If someone offers to sell a car for $10,000, and later decides to withdraw
the offer, they can revoke it as long as the offeree hasn't accepted yet.
2. Rejection: If the offeree rejects the offer, it terminates immediately.
o Example: If someone offers a $10,000 sale price for a car and the offeree says, "No, I
won't pay that much," the offer is terminated.
3. Lapse of Time: If an offer is not accepted within the time specified (or a reasonable time if
no time is stated), the offer lapses.
o Example: An offer made to sell goods expires after a reasonable time if the offeree
doesn't accept it.
4. Death or Insanity: If either the offeror or offeree dies or becomes mentally incompetent
before the offer is accepted, the offer is terminated.

59 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Performance of Contracts

Once a contract has been formed (with offer, acceptance, consideration, etc.), it needs to be
performed according to the agreed terms. The performance phase involves fulfilling the promises
made by the parties involved.

Key Points About Performance:

1. Full Performance:
o Full performance occurs when both parties have completed their respective
obligations under the contract. For example, in a sale contract, the seller delivers the
goods, and the buyer pays the agreed price.
2. Partial Performance:
o Sometimes, only part of the contract is performed. In cases where partial
performance occurs, the parties might agree to amend the terms or reach a
compromise, or the contract might be terminated if full performance is essential.
o Example: A contractor completes part of a construction project, but not all the work.
The buyer might seek a partial payment or further action.
3. Time of Performance:
o Some contracts require performance by a certain deadline or within a certain period.
If a contract includes a specific time for performance, failure to perform within that
time can constitute a breach.
o Example: A contract to deliver goods by a specific date is enforceable, and delivery
after the agreed date could lead to a breach.
4. Tender of Performance:
o A tender of performance means offering to perform your contractual obligations.
Even if the offer of performance is refused, the tender is considered sufficient to
discharge the obligation.
o Example: A buyer who refuses to accept the delivery of goods, even though they
were tendered as per the contract terms, may still be obligated to pay for the goods.

Breach of Contract

A breach of contract occurs when one party fails to fulfill their contractual obligations. Breaches can
vary in severity and can impact the enforcement of the agreement.

Types of Breach:

1. Minor or Partial Breach:

o A minor breach (also called a partial breach) happens when one party fails to
perform a part of the contract but the overall purpose of the contract is not
defeated.
o Example: A contractor paints a house but misses a small section. While the breach
occurred, the contract's purpose is still achieved, and the other party may seek
compensation for the incomplete section.
2. Material Breach:
o A material breach is a serious violation of the contract that goes to the heart of the
agreement, making it impossible for the contract to be fulfilled.

60 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

o Example: A builder does not complete a construction project, or a car

dealership does not deliver the vehicle after payment has been made. A
material breach usually justifies termination of the contract.
3. Anticipatory Breach:
o An anticipatory breach occurs when one party indicates, before the time of
performance, that they will not be able to fulfill their obligations under the contract.
o Example: If a seller informs the buyer before the delivery date that they will not
deliver the goods, the buyer may choose to treat the contract as breached
immediately.
4. Repudiatory Breach:
o Repudiatory breaches occur when one party's actions or conduct show an intention
not to perform their contractual obligations. A repudiatory breach often leads to the
innocent party choosing to terminate the contract and claim damages.

Remedies for Breach of Contract

When a breach of contract occurs, the injured party is entitled to seek a remedy to make them
whole. The types of remedies available depend on the nature of the breach and the desired
outcome.

Common Remedies for Breach:

1. Damages:
o The most common remedy for a breach of contract is damages, which refers to
financial compensation to cover the loss caused by the breach.
o Compensatory Damages: These are awarded to compensate the injured party for
the actual loss they suffered.
 Example: If a seller breaches a contract to deliver goods, the buyer may be
awarded the difference between the contracted price and the price they
paid for the goods from another seller.
o Consequential Damages: These are damages that arise as a consequence of the
breach and are typically awarded for losses that were not directly caused by the
breach but are a result of it.
 Example: If a supplier fails to deliver materials on time, leading to
production delays and lost profits, the injured party may seek consequential
damages for the lost profits.
o Punitive Damages: These are damages intended to punish the wrongdoer and deter
others from committing similar acts. However, punitive damages are not typically
awarded in contract cases unless there is an element of fraud or malicious intent.
o Nominal Damages: When there is no significant loss but a legal wrong has occurred,
a small amount of money may be awarded as nominal damages, typically to
acknowledge the breach.
2. Specific Performance:
o In some cases, instead of receiving monetary compensation, the injured party may
ask the court to order the breaching party to perform the contract as originally
agreed.
o Example: If a rare painting is sold under contract and the seller refuses to deliver it,
the buyer may seek specific performance, demanding that the seller transfer the
painting, rather than just receiving money for the breach.

61 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

o Specific performance is typically only granted in cases where damages are

inadequate, such as with unique goods or properties.
3. Rescission:
o Rescission involves canceling or undoing the contract. This allows the parties to be
released from their obligations and return to their pre-contract status.
o Example: If there has been a material breach or fraud, the injured party can seek
rescission, meaning the contract is voided, and the parties are restored to their
original positions.
4. Reformation:
o Reformation involves changing or modifying the terms of the contract to reflect the
true intentions of the parties.
o Example: If a written contract inaccurately reflects the terms agreed upon by the
parties, one party may seek reformation to correct the mistake.
5. Liquidated Damages:
o A liquidated damages clause in a contract specifies the amount of damages that
must be paid in the event of a breach. This is meant to avoid disputes over the
calculation of damages.
o Example: A construction contract might include a liquidated damages clause
specifying that the builder will pay a set amount per day for each day the project is
delayed.

Discharge of Contracts

A contract may come to an end in several ways:

1. Performance: The contract is discharged when both parties have fully performed their
obligations.
2. Agreement: The parties may agree to discharge the contract, even if it is not completed. This
can be through mutual consent, where both parties agree to terminate the contract before
performance is completed.
3. Frustration: A contract may be discharged due to frustration if an unforeseen event makes
performance impossible. For example, if a natural disaster destroys the subject matter of the
contract, it may be discharged.
4. Breach: A material breach may lead to the discharge of the contract, particularly if the
breach is serious enough to justify termination.
5. Impossibility: If performance becomes impossible due to unforeseen circumstances (e.g.,
death, destruction of subject matter), the contract may be discharged.

Other Important Topics in Contract Law

1. Contractual Capacity of Minors:

o As mentioned earlier, minors (individuals under 18) generally cannot enter into
binding contracts unless the contract is for necessities (e.g., food, clothing, shelter)
or the minor ratifies the contract upon reaching adulthood.
2. Contractual Defenses:
o Mistake: If both parties are mistaken about an essential fact of the contract, the
contract may be voidable.
o Duress: A contract entered into under duress (threat of harm) is voidable.

62 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

o Undue Influence: Contracts formed under undue influence, where one party
uses their position to unfairly dominate another party, are voidable.
o Fraud: If one party intentionally deceives the other, the contract is voidable.
3. Unenforceable Contracts:
o A contract may be unenforceable if it is vague, involves illegal subject matter, or lacks
necessary legal elements such as capacity or consideration.

Contract Interpretation

Sometimes, disputes arise about what a contract really means, especially when the terms are
unclear or ambiguous. Courts often must interpret contract language to ensure fairness and clarity.

Key Principles of Contract Interpretation:

1. Plain Meaning Rule:

o Courts will generally interpret contract terms based on their ordinary, common
meanings, unless the contract specifically defines a term differently.
o Example: If a contract says "deliver the goods within 7 days," and the term "days" is
not otherwise defined, the court will assume it refers to regular calendar days.
2. Contextual Interpretation:
o In cases where the terms are unclear, courts may look at the context in which the
contract was formed, including the surrounding circumstances and the purpose of
the contract.
o Example: If a contract is about selling specialized equipment, and the term "delivery"
is ambiguous, the court might consider industry practices to clarify the meaning.
3. Parol Evidence Rule:
o This rule holds that if a contract is written and considered the final agreement, oral
or written statements made before or during the signing of the contract that
contradict the written agreement are generally inadmissible.
o Example: If a buyer and seller have a written contract for the sale of a car and a
previous oral conversation suggested a different price, the court will typically ignore
the oral conversation unless it is part of the written agreement.
4. Ambiguity:
o If a term is unclear or ambiguous, courts may interpret it against the interests of the
party that drafted the contract. This principle is often referred to as contra
proferentem.
o Example: If a contract’s term about “delivery dates” is vague, a court may interpret it
against the party who wrote the contract if that party is the one who could have
clarified it.

Contracts Involving Third Parties

Not all contracts only affect the two parties directly involved in the agreement. Sometimes, third
parties can be impacted by the contract or may have rights under it.

63 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

1. Privity of Contract:

 Privity refers to the relationship that exists between the parties to a contract. Only those
who are parties to the contract have the right to enforce it. Third parties generally cannot
sue to enforce the terms of the contract.
 Example: If a business enters into a contract with a supplier for goods, and a consumer is
affected by a defect in the goods, the consumer generally cannot sue under the contract
because they are not a party to it.

2. Third-Party Beneficiaries:

 Some contracts are made with the intention of benefiting a third party, even though the
third party is not a party to the contract.
 Example: A life insurance policy where the beneficiary is a third party who will receive the
payout upon the insured’s death.
 Types:
o Creditor Beneficiaries: If a contract is made to pay a debt owed to a third party, that
third party is considered a creditor beneficiary and can enforce the contract.
o Donee Beneficiaries: A third party who benefits from a contract but not because of
any obligation (e.g., life insurance beneficiaries or gifts).

3. Assignment of Rights:

 Parties to a contract can assign their rights (but not obligations) under the contract to a third
party.
 Example: If someone sells their right to receive payment under a contract to another person,
the buyer now has the right to collect that money.
 However, the assignor (the original party) remains responsible for fulfilling their obligations
under the contract unless the contract explicitly allows them to transfer obligations.

4. Delegation of Duties:

 A party to a contract may delegate their duties to another party, but they remain responsible
for the performance of the contract.
 Example: A construction contractor may delegate the job of painting to a subcontractor.
However, the main contractor is still liable for ensuring the painting is done properly.

Contract Formation in Detail: Unilateral and Bilateral Contracts

Let’s expand on two important types of contracts: unilateral contracts and bilateral contracts.

1. Unilateral Contracts:

 A unilateral contract involves one party making a promise in exchange for the performance
of an act by another party. The contract is only formed once the act is completed.
 Example: "I will pay $100 to anyone who finds and returns my lost dog." This is a unilateral
contract because the offeror (the person who lost the dog) is not bound to pay unless
someone actually returns the dog.

64 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Acceptance and Performance: The acceptance of the offer in unilateral contracts

occurs when the act (in this case, returning the dog) is performed. Until then, the
offeror cannot revoke the offer.

2. Bilateral Contracts:

 A bilateral contract involves two parties exchanging promises to perform certain acts. Both
parties are bound by the promises they make.
 Example: "I will sell you my car for $10,000, and you agree to buy it." Here, both parties are
making promises (the seller promises to sell, and the buyer promises to buy).
 Mutual Obligation: In bilateral contracts, each party’s promise is considered an offer, and the
acceptance of one promise (for example, by the buyer agreeing to pay) results in a legally
binding contract.

Types of Specific Contracts in Contract Law

Contracts can also be categorized based on their specific purpose or application. Below are some
common types of contracts:

1. Sales Contracts:

 These contracts involve the transfer of ownership of goods from one party (the seller) to
another (the buyer) in exchange for money or other consideration.
 Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): In the U.S., the UCC governs sales contracts involving
goods and provides rules on contract formation, terms, performance, and breach.

2. Employment Contracts:

 Employment contracts define the terms of the relationship between an employer and
employee, including duties, compensation, benefits, and termination conditions.
 These contracts often include provisions related to confidentiality, non-compete clauses, and
intellectual property ownership.

3. Lease Contracts:

 A lease contract involves the renting of property or goods from one party (the lessor) to
another (the lessee). These contracts outline the rights and responsibilities of the parties
regarding payment, maintenance, and return of the property.

4. Construction Contracts:

 These contracts govern the relationship between a contractor and the party commissioning
the work (such as a homeowner or a business). They include terms regarding payment,
timeline, specifications of the work, and dispute resolution.

5. Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs):

 NDAs are contracts designed to protect sensitive information. One party agrees not to
disclose specific information to third parties.
65 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Example: A business might ask an employee to sign an NDA to prevent them from
sharing proprietary information with competitors.

Equitable Remedies and the Role of Courts

While most remedies for a breach of contract are monetary (damages), equitable remedies may be
used in specific cases where monetary damages are inadequate or inappropriate.

1. Specific Performance:
o As mentioned, specific performance is an equitable remedy requiring the breaching
party to perform the contract as agreed, rather than paying damages.
o Typically, it is used when the subject matter of the contract is unique or when
damages would be insufficient.
o Example: In real estate transactions, where the property is unique, a court may
order specific performance rather than just awarding money.
2. Injunction:
o An injunction is a court order that requires a party to do or refrain from doing
something.
o Example: A court may issue an injunction to stop someone from violating a non-
compete clause in an employment contract.
3. Rescission:
o Rescission is a remedy that cancels the contract and attempts to return the parties to
the position they were in before the contract.
o This is typically used when the contract was entered into under duress, fraud, or
misrepresentation.

Conclusion

Contract law is vast and complex, with many nuances and layers of rules. Whether it involves
interpreting contract terms, dealing with breaches, considering specific performance, or
understanding how third-party interests are protected, the scope of contract law impacts nearly
every aspect of business, personal transactions, and relationships.

66 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Acceptance & Consideration

In contract law, acceptance and consideration are fundamental principles that govern the formation
of a valid contract. These concepts work hand-in-hand with the capacities of the parties to form a
legally binding agreement.

1. Acceptance:

Acceptance refers to the final expression of consent to the terms of the offer made by one party (the
offeror). For a contract to be formed, the acceptance must meet certain conditions:

 Unconditional: The acceptance must be unequivocal and match the terms of the offer
exactly. This is known as the "mirror image rule," where any deviation from the offer would
be considered a counteroffer, not acceptance.
 Communicated: Acceptance must be communicated to the offeror unless the offeror has
waived this requirement or specified that silence is deemed acceptance.
 Timely: The acceptance must occur within the time frame specified in the offer, or within a
reasonable time if no time limit is set. If the offeror withdraws the offer before acceptance,
no contract is formed.
 Method of Acceptance: The offeror may specify a method of acceptance (e.g., in writing, via
email, by phone), and the offeree must accept according to the prescribed method unless
otherwise agreed.

Acceptance is a crucial component in the formation of a contract, but there are various nuances to
consider:

 Mode of Acceptance: While verbal and written acceptance are the most common forms,
some contracts require specific modes of acceptance (e.g., via email, fax, or through a
physical signature). If an offeror specifies a mode of acceptance, that method must generally
be followed unless the offeror waives it.
o Example: If a seller offers to sell goods to a buyer and specifies that the buyer must
accept the offer by signing and returning a document, the buyer’s failure to follow
that exact procedure could prevent the formation of a valid contract.
 Revocation of Offer: An offer can be revoked anytime before acceptance, even if the offeror
promised to keep the offer open for a certain period. However, if the offeror makes an
option contract (i.e., an agreement to keep the offer open for a specific time in exchange for
consideration), the offer cannot be revoked during that time.
o Example: A seller offers to sell goods to a buyer for $100, and the buyer verbally
accepts. The seller cannot revoke the offer as soon as the buyer accepts; however, if
the offeror says, “I’ll hold this offer for you until tomorrow if you give me $10,” then
the seller cannot revoke the offer before the expiration of that time.
 Counteroffer: A counteroffer occurs when the offeree changes the terms of the original
offer. A counteroffer functions as a rejection of the original offer and proposes new terms. In
such cases, the original offer is no longer valid, and the original offeror must decide whether
to accept the counteroffer.
o Example: If someone offers to sell their car for $10,000 and the buyer responds, “I
will pay $9,000,” that response is a counteroffer, not an acceptance.
 Mailbox Rule: In some jurisdictions, the "mailbox rule" applies. This rule states that, if the
acceptance is sent via mail (or another specified method), the contract is formed when the
acceptance is dispatched, not when it is received by the offeror.

67 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

o Example: A person sends an acceptance letter by mail, and under the

mailbox rule, the acceptance is effective as soon as the letter is sent, even if
the offeror doesn’t receive it for several days.

In addition to the basic principles of acceptance, there are more specific rules and exceptions that
can affect how acceptance is treated in contract formation.

Timing of Acceptance:

 Revocation of Offer: As mentioned earlier, an offer can be revoked anytime before

acceptance, but there are some exceptions where revocation is not allowed:
o Option Contracts: These are agreements where the offeror agrees to hold an offer
open for a certain period in exchange for consideration (e.g., paying a sum to keep
the offer open for a period of time). In this case, the offer cannot be revoked during
that period.
o Unilateral Contracts: If an offeror makes a unilateral contract (e.g., "I will pay you
$500 if you find my lost dog"), acceptance only occurs when the offeree begins to
perform the act (finding the dog). Once performance begins, the offeror is bound to
fulfill the promise, and the offer cannot be revoked.

Acceptance by Conduct:

 Conduct as Acceptance: In some cases, a party may accept an offer by their conduct, rather
than explicitly stating acceptance. If the offeree begins to perform according to the terms of
the offer, this can constitute acceptance.
o Example: If someone offers to pay another person $500 for painting their fence, and
the other person begins painting the fence, their conduct (starting to paint) would
likely constitute acceptance of the offer.

Acceptance with Modifications:

 Battle of the Forms: This occurs in business transactions where the offeror and offeree use
standard forms (such as invoices, purchase orders, or contracts). If the offeree's acceptance
includes terms that differ from the original offer, it might result in a "battle of the forms,"
where the terms of the contract are determined by the final form agreed upon by both
parties.
o Example: Company A sends a purchase order with certain terms, and Company B
accepts the order but includes different payment terms. In such cases, the terms of
the contract could depend on whether the differing terms are considered material
and accepted by both parties.

Conditional Acceptance:

 Conditional Acceptance: A conditional acceptance occurs when the offeree agrees to the
offer, but their acceptance is contingent on certain conditions. In such cases, the acceptance
doesn’t fully bind the parties to a contract unless the conditions are met.
o Example: "I accept your offer to sell the car for $5,000, but only if it passes a
mechanical inspection." This is not a final acceptance until the condition (the car
passing inspection) is fulfilled.

68 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Mirror Image Rule (in Common Law):

 The mirror image rule requires that the acceptance must match the offer exactly. Any
modification or addition to the terms of the offer will turn the acceptance into a
counteroffer, not an acceptance.
o Example: If someone offers to sell their car for $5,000 and the offeree replies, "I
accept your offer, but I want to pay $4,500," this is a counteroffer, not an
acceptance. The contract isn’t formed unless the offeror accepts the counteroffer.

Acceptance and Silence:

 In most cases, silence is not considered acceptance. However, there are exceptions where
silence may be interpreted as acceptance, particularly when:
o Previous course of dealing: If the parties have a history of dealing where silence was
treated as acceptance, it may be implied.
o Ongoing relationships: In cases of long-standing business relationships, silence may
indicate assent to continued terms, especially when the offeree has the opportunity
to object but does not.
o Example: A subscription service automatically renews unless the subscriber actively
cancels. By continuing to use the service without objection, the subscriber might be
deemed to have accepted the renewal terms.

Acceptance and Electronic Communication:

 With the advent of electronic contracts and digital signatures, acceptance can take place
through various online platforms or email. In such cases, the acceptance terms might be
governed by specific electronic signatures laws (such as the ESIGN Act in the U.S.) that give
legal weight to electronic agreements.
o Example: A person clicks "I agree" on an online terms-and-conditions form. This click
can constitute acceptance under digital contract laws, making the agreement
binding, provided the user had sufficient notice and opportunity to review the terms.

2. Consideration:

Consideration refers to something of value that is exchanged between the parties to a contract. This
could be money, goods, services, or an agreement to refrain from doing something. Consideration is
necessary for a contract to be legally enforceable. For a contract to have consideration:

 Mutual Exchange: Both parties must provide consideration. A contract where one party
provides something, and the other party provides nothing, may not be valid unless some
legal exception exists (e.g., a gift or unilateral contract).
 Legality: The consideration must be legal and not against public policy. For example, a
contract based on illegal activity is not enforceable.
 Adequacy: The law does not typically concern itself with the adequacy of the consideration,
meaning it does not matter if the exchanged values are equal, as long as there is some value
exchanged. Courts will generally not assess whether the consideration is fair or adequate
unless it is grossly disproportionate.

Consideration is what makes a contract enforceable. Without it, a promise is generally not
enforceable unless it falls under exceptions like a gift or certain formalized agreements. Here's a
deeper look:

69 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Types of Consideration:
o Executed Consideration: This occurs when one party has already performed
their side of the bargain. For example, a seller delivers goods to the buyer and the
buyer promises to pay later. The delivery of goods (completed act) is the executed
consideration.
o Executory Consideration: This occurs when the promises to act in the future, such as
agreeing to pay a sum of money in exchange for a service to be performed in the
future. For example, agreeing to pay someone $500 to fix your car next week.
 Past Consideration: If a promise is made based on past actions, it typically does not qualify
as valid consideration. This is because a contract requires a present or future exchange of
value.
o Example: If someone performs a service for you (e.g., fixes your car) and afterward,
you promise to pay them $100 for the service, your promise is not enforceable
because the consideration (the car fix) happened in the past, before the promise to
pay was made.
 Nominal Consideration: In some cases, parties may agree on a very small amount of
consideration to meet the formal requirement of a contract. For example, one party may sell
something for $1 to another party, just to ensure that the contract is legally binding. The
courts will generally not assess whether the consideration is adequate, but it must exist to
form a contract.
o Example: A contract may state, "In consideration of $1 and other good and valuable
consideration, the parties agree..." Even though $1 is nominal, it satisfies the
requirement of consideration.
 Pre-existing Duty: If a party is already legally obligated to perform an action, promising to do
that action in exchange for something is not valid consideration. For example, a police
officer cannot accept a reward for catching a criminal, as catching criminals is part of their
job.
o Example: A builder who is already contracted to build a house cannot demand
additional money for completing work that was already part of the contract's terms.

Consideration is a critical element of contract law, and there are a few more aspects to understand
about how it works and what qualifies as valid consideration.

Adequacy of Consideration:

 Value of Consideration: As previously noted, the courts generally do not assess the
adequacy (fairness or equality) of the consideration unless it is so grossly disproportionate
that it raises concerns about coercion or fraud. For example, paying $1 for a car valued at
$10,000 may still be considered valid if both parties voluntarily agree, but the court may
examine whether undue pressure or misrepresentation was involved.
o Example: A seller who offers to sell a valuable piece of property for $1 could have a
court scrutinize the transaction if there's evidence that the seller was coerced or
deceived into agreeing to the low price.

Illusory Promises:

 Illusory Promises: A promise that appears to be a commitment but is, in fact, vague or
unenforceable, does not constitute valid consideration. A promise is illusory if it doesn’t
actually bind the promisor to do anything.

70 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

o Example: A statement like "I will pay you $500 if I feel like it" is not valid
consideration because the promisor is not actually committing to anything—
there’s no true obligation.

Pre-existing Duty and Consideration:

 Pre-existing Duty Rule: If a party is already under a legal obligation to perform an action,
their promise to perform that duty does not constitute valid consideration. This is because
the performance is not new or additional consideration.
o Example: A police officer who receives a reward for solving a crime cannot claim the
reward, because solving crimes is part of their job. They are already legally bound to
perform the action, so no additional consideration exists.

Modification of Contracts:

 Modification of Existing Contracts: When modifying an existing contract, the modified terms
must be supported by new consideration. Simply agreeing to change the terms without
providing new value from both parties could render the modification unenforceable.
o Example: If a contractor agrees to complete a project for $5,000 and later agrees to
finish it for $6,000, both parties must exchange something of value to support this
modification (such as additional work or changes in specifications).

Past Consideration and Promise to Pay Debts:

 A promise to pay a debt that is already owed does not constitute valid consideration
because the debtor is already legally bound to fulfill the obligation.
o Example: A debtor promises to pay a debt of $5,000 that they are already obligated
to pay. The promise is not enforceable because the consideration (the payment)
already existed.

Mutual Consideration:

 Mutual consideration means that both parties exchange something of value. The contract is
typically enforceable if both parties provide consideration. Even a nominal exchange is
enough to create a contract, but the consideration must still be real and bargained for.
o Example: A buyer offers $1 to purchase a piece of property, and the seller accepts
the $1. Although the $1 seems insignificant, it satisfies the requirement of
consideration, as it represents a mutual exchange.

Pre-existing Duty (Explored More):

 When one party has a pre-existing duty to perform an act, promising to perform that act
does not constitute valid consideration. This rule ensures that people can’t demand more for
doing something they are already obligated to do.
o Example: A fireman cannot demand extra payment for putting out a fire if it’s part of
his job. Similarly, a teacher cannot demand more payment for teaching a class that
they are already contracted to teach.

71 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Modification of Existing Contracts with Consideration:

 In some cases, when parties want to modify a contract, new consideration must be
provided. If one party agrees to perform something different or additional, that becomes
valid consideration. However, simply changing the terms of an agreement without providing
new consideration could lead to an unenforceable modification.
o Example: If a contractor is already under contract to build a house for $100,000 but
later agrees to complete additional work for $10,000, the additional work constitutes
new consideration and makes the modification enforceable.

3. Capacities of the Parties:

The capacity of the parties refers to their legal ability to enter into a contract. Generally, the
following categories apply:

 Minors: Individuals under a certain age (usually 18) are generally considered not to have full
capacity to contract. However, contracts made by minors are typically voidable at the
minor's discretion. There are exceptions, such as for contracts involving essential goods or
services.
 Mental Capacity: Individuals with mental impairments or those under the influence of drugs
or alcohol may lack the capacity to enter into contracts. A contract entered into by someone
who is mentally incapacitated is voidable by that individual.
 Intoxication: If a person is so intoxicated that they are unable to understand the nature and
consequences of the contract, the contract may be voidable by the intoxicated party.
 Corporations: Companies and other organizations have the capacity to contract, but they do
so through agents. The agent must have authority to bind the company to the contract.

Relationship Between Acceptance, Consideration, and Capacity:

 Acceptance ensures that both parties agree to the terms of the contract.
 Consideration ensures that there is a mutual exchange of value between the parties.
 Capacity ensures that the parties are legally able to enter into the contract.

All these elements must work together for a contract to be legally binding. If any of these elements
are lacking or defective, the contract may be unenforceable or void.

Capacity means that the parties involved in a contract have the legal ability to make a valid
agreement. If a party lacks capacity, the contract may be voidable or unenforceable. Let’s explore
further:

 Minors: As mentioned, individuals under the age of 18 typically lack the legal capacity to
enter into most contracts. Contracts with minors are usually voidable at the minor’s
discretion, except for contracts for essential items like food, clothing, or medical care.
o Example: A 16-year-old buys a car on credit. If the car is non-essential, they may
have the option to void the contract. However, if the car is deemed necessary for
their employment (like a work vehicle), the contract may be enforceable.
 Mental Incapacity: A person who is mentally incapacitated (due to illness, intoxication, or
disability) may not have the ability to contract unless they regain their mental capacity or
the contract is beneficial to them.

72 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

o Example: An elderly person with dementia who sells their property at a

greatly reduced price may have the right to void the contract if it was made
when they were unable to understand the terms.
 Intoxication: Contracts entered into by a person who is severely intoxicated may be voidable
if they were unable to understand the nature and consequences of the contract at the time
of formation. However, mere intoxication (e.g., being slightly tipsy) may not be sufficient to
void a contract.
o Example: A person who signs a contract while heavily intoxicated could argue the
contract is voidable, but if they can prove they were fully aware of the contract
terms at the time, the contract might still stand.
 Corporations and Business Entities: Corporations and other legal entities can enter into
contracts, but these entities do so through authorized representatives, such as directors or
officers. The corporation must have the legal authority to enter into the contract, which is
typically determined by its governing documents (e.g., articles of incorporation or bylaws).
o Example: A corporate officer enters into a contract to lease office space. If the
officer had the authority to make such agreements under the company’s bylaws, the
contract is binding. However, if the officer exceeds their authority, the contract may
not bind the corporation.

Understanding the capacity of parties to contract is important, as certain individuals or entities may
not be able to form legally binding contracts under all circumstances. Let’s explore some additional
elements that affect capacity.

Contracts with Minors:

 Exceptions to Minor’s Ability to Disaffirm Contracts: While most contracts made by minors
are voidable at the minor’s discretion, there are important exceptions.
o Necessaries: Contracts for items deemed necessary (e.g., food, clothing, shelter) are
generally enforceable against minors. This ensures that minors can obtain essential
items even if they lack full legal capacity.
 Example: A minor who contracts for a basic mobile phone or rental housing
could still be held responsible for the contract, as these items are deemed
necessary for daily life.
 Ratification by Minors: Once a minor reaches the age of majority (usually 18), they may
ratify a contract they previously entered into when they were underage. This means the
minor may choose to affirm the contract, making it fully enforceable.
o Example: A 17-year-old enters into a lease for an apartment. When they turn 18,
they decide to continue living there and pay the rent—this can be considered a
ratification of the contract.

Mental Capacity and Contracts:

 Intoxication and Mental Capacity: If someone enters into a contract while intoxicated or
mentally incapacitated, they may be able to avoid enforcement of the contract. However,
the person must prove they were unable to understand the nature of the agreement at the
time of contracting.
o Example: If someone signs a contract for an expensive item while heavily intoxicated
and later realizes they didn’t understand the terms, they may have the right to
disaffirm the contract based on lack of mental capacity.
 Restitution and Mental Incapacity: If a mentally incapacitated person enters into a contract,
and the contract is voided, they may be required to return any benefits received under the

73 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

contract. This is known as restitution, which aims to restore the parties to their
original positions.
o Example: A person with a mental impairment signs a contract to sell a valuable item.
If the contract is voided due to incapacity, the person may need to return the money
or goods they received under the agreement.

Corporations and Contractual Authority:

 Agency and Authority: When a corporation enters into a contract, the contract is made by
the corporation’s agents (such as officers, directors, or employees). These agents must have
the authority to bind the corporation. If they exceed their authority, the corporation may
not be bound by the contract.
o Example: A company’s president signs a contract to buy equipment, but the
company’s bylaws require board approval for such purchases. If the president did not
have authority under the company’s governing documents, the contract may not be
enforceable.

Additional Important Concepts:

Capacity of Corporations and Legal Entities:

 Legal entities like corporations, limited liability companies (LLCs), and partnerships have the
legal capacity to contract, but they do so through representatives. The authority of these
representatives is often determined by the entity’s governing documents, such as the articles
of incorporation, bylaws, or partnership agreements.

Contracting with Government Agencies:

 Special rules apply when individuals or companies enter into contracts with government
agencies. These contracts must often adhere to specific legal requirements and protocols
that do not apply to private contracts. Government contracts may be subject to regulations
related to public bidding, budget constraints, and public policy.

Capacity of Minors (Extended Discussion):

 Disaffirmance of Contracts by Minors: In most cases, minors have the right to disaffirm
(cancel) contracts they enter into before reaching the age of majority. The key point is that
disaffirmance is typically allowed even after the minor turns 18, within a reasonable time
frame.
o Exception: Contracts for Necessaries – Minors may not disaffirm contracts for
necessaries (items like food, clothing, or medical care). The law protects sellers who
provide necessary goods and services to minors by ensuring they are paid.
o Example: A 17-year-old who enters into a contract to purchase a car cannot
disaffirm the contract unless the car is not necessary for their life. However, if the
car is used for work or as a basic form of transportation, the contract might be
enforceable.

74 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Mental Incapacity (Additional Exploration):

 Mental Incapacity: If a person suffers from mental incapacity or is under the influence of
drugs or alcohol, the contract can be voided if they did not understand the nature and
consequences of the agreement at the time of signing.
o Lucid Intervals: If a person has periods of lucidity (a brief period of mental clarity or
normal understanding), contracts entered into during those lucid moments may still
be enforceable.
o Example: An elderly person with dementia might sign a contract to sell their house
for a low price. If it’s later shown that they didn’t understand the nature of the
transaction due to their mental state, the contract may be voidable. But if they
signed during a period of lucidity and understood what they were doing, the
contract could stand.

Intoxication (Extended Insight):

 Intoxicated Persons and Contracts: If someone enters into a contract while intoxicated
(whether by drugs or alcohol), they may be able to void the contract, but they must show
that they were unable to understand the nature of the agreement at the time.
o Example: If a person signs a contract while heavily intoxicated, but later realizes
they were unaware of the terms due to intoxication, they might be able to void the
contract. However, if the intoxication was mild and didn’t impair their
understanding, the contract could still be enforced.
o Restitution: In cases where an intoxicated person voids a contract, they may still be
required to return any goods or money received as part of the agreement (this is
called restitution).

Corporations and Capacity to Contract:

 Corporate Entities and Authority: Corporations can enter into contracts, but they must do
so through authorized agents. These agents must act within the scope of their authority, as
defined by the corporation’s governing documents (e.g., bylaws or board resolutions). If the
agent exceeds their authority, the contract may be voidable by the corporation.
o Example: A corporate executive who signs a lease agreement on behalf of the
company must have the authority to do so. If they do not have that authority (e.g., it
was not authorized by the board of directors), the company may not be bound by
the contract.

Additional Advanced Considerations:

Contractual Capacity in Special Cases:

 Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies (LLCs): These entities have a legal capacity to
contract, but the rules regarding authority to bind the company vary. For example, in a
partnership, all partners typically have authority to enter into contracts on behalf of the
business. In an LLC, the members or managers must have specific authority under the
operating agreement.

75 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Contracts with Government Entities:

 Government Contracts: When individuals or companies enter into contracts with

government agencies, those contracts are typically subject to additional regulations,
procurement laws, and public policy considerations. These contracts might involve bidding
processes, public oversight, and other checks to ensure compliance with governmental
standards.

Conclusion:

Contract law is intricate, with each element—acceptance, consideration, and capacity—having

detailed rules and exceptions that shape the validity of agreements. An understanding of these
nuances is vital for determining whether a contract is enforceable, whether it can be modified, or
whether one of the parties can void it based on their mental state, age, or the terms involved.

76 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 The Capacity of Parties

In contract law, the capacity of the parties refers to the ability of individuals or entities to enter into
legally binding agreements. For a contract to be valid and enforceable, the parties involved must
have the legal capacity to understand the nature of the agreement and the consequences of their
actions. There are specific categories of individuals and entities that may lack the capacity to
contract, and understanding these categories is key to ensuring that contracts are properly formed.
The following are the common types of capacity in contract law:

1. Minors (Underage Individuals)

 In many jurisdictions, individuals under a certain age (typically 18) are considered minors and
are generally not legally able to enter into binding contracts.
 Exceptions: A minor can be bound by contracts for essential goods or services (e.g., food,
clothing, shelter). In some cases, if a minor misrepresents their age or if the contract is for
something non-essential, the contract may be voidable by the minor.
 Voidable Contracts: A minor has the right to disaffirm (cancel) a contract within a reasonable
time after reaching the age of majority, except for contracts involving necessities.

2. Mental Incapacity

 Individuals who are mentally incapacitated due to conditions like mental illness or disability
may lack the ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions when
entering into a contract.
 Void or Voidable Contracts: Contracts entered into by individuals who lack mental capacity
are typically voidable. If a person is deemed to be mentally incompetent at the time of
entering into the contract, the contract can be rescinded by the incapacitated party or their
guardian.
 Standard of Incapacity: The law often requires that the person lacked the ability to
understand the contract’s terms at the time of agreement. Temporary conditions like
intoxication may not always lead to a contract being voidable.

3. Intoxication

 A person who is intoxicated (whether by alcohol, drugs, or other substances) may not have
the capacity to enter into a valid contract if they are unable to understand the nature of the
agreement.
 Voidable Contracts: Similar to mental incapacity, contracts made while intoxicated can be
voidable. However, it depends on the severity of the intoxication and whether the
intoxicated party can show that they were unable to understand what they were agreeing to.

4. Corporations and Legal Entities

 Corporations and other legal entities (e.g., partnerships) generally have the capacity to
contract. However, the capacity to contract depends on the authority of the individuals
acting on behalf of the entity.
 Corporate Authority: An agent or officer of a corporation may need to have the authority to
bind the corporation in a contract. If they exceed their authority, the contract may be
voidable or unenforceable.

77 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and Partnerships: Similar to corporations, the

capacity to contract for LLCs and partnerships depends on the roles and authority of
the individuals acting on behalf of the entity.

5. Aliens and Foreign Nationals

 In some jurisdictions, foreign nationals (non-citizens or residents) may be restricted in their

capacity to contract, depending on the laws governing foreigners’ rights to do business
within a country.
 Restrictions: Some countries impose restrictions on foreigners entering into certain contracts
(e.g., property ownership, business transactions) or may require a certain level of legal
capacity for a foreigner to enter into contracts within that jurisdiction.

6. Other Considerations

 Fraud or Duress: If a party enters into a contract under fraud or duress, they may lack the
capacity to voluntarily agree to the contract, which could render the contract void or
voidable.
 Mistake: If one or both parties make a significant mistake about the terms of the contract or
the subject matter, it may affect their capacity to contract.

In summary, for a contract to be legally binding, the parties must generally have the mental and
legal capacity to understand the terms of the contract and the consequences of entering into it.
When a party lacks the required capacity, the contract may be voidable or unenforceable.

7. Persons of Limited Capacity

Certain individuals may have a limited capacity to contract due to specific circumstances or legal
restrictions. This includes:

 Persons under Guardianship: Individuals who are under the legal guardianship of another
person (due to mental incapacity or age) often cannot enter into binding contracts on their
own, except for contracts for necessities.
 Individuals Declared Insane or Under Mental Disability: Persons who have been legally
declared insane or mentally incapable of understanding the nature of their actions by a court
may lack the capacity to contract. In these cases, their contracts are typically void, or at best,
voidable.
 Incarcerated Individuals: In some jurisdictions, individuals who are incarcerated may have
limited capacity to contract, especially for contracts unrelated to their imprisonment. Certain
restrictions might apply based on public policy considerations.

8. Public Policy Limitations on Capacity

Even if a person has the legal capacity to contract, certain restrictions may exist based on public
policy considerations:

 Contracts for Illegal Activities: A contract that involves illegal activities (e.g., drug trafficking,
fraud) is void and unenforceable, regardless of the capacity of the parties involved. Courts
will not enforce contracts that violate the law, even if the parties have the legal capacity to
contract.

78 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Contracts Against Public Morality: Contracts that contravene public morals or ethical
norms (e.g., gambling contracts in jurisdictions where it is prohibited) may be
considered unenforceable even if both parties have capacity.
 Contractual Restrictions: Some parties might be restricted from entering into certain
contracts due to specific regulations (e.g., minors not being able to engage in specific
financial transactions or young athletes restricted in certain endorsements).

9. Contracts for Necessaries (Necessities)

One of the key exceptions to the general rule that minors (and in some cases, individuals with
limited capacity) cannot contract is that they can enter into contracts for "necessaries." These are
goods or services that are essential for survival or well-being and are typically considered to be food,
shelter, clothing, medical services, and other items needed to live.

 Necessaries for Minors: Minors can be held liable for contracts related to essential items
(e.g., food, clothing, medical treatment) because these contracts serve the minor’s basic
needs and are often considered in the best interest of the minor.
 Limited Recovery: However, in many jurisdictions, the recovery for necessaries is often
limited to a reasonable value, and the contract is not necessarily enforceable beyond that.
Courts may look to ensure fairness and avoid exploitation of the minor or incapacitated
person.

10. Contractual Capacity and Family Law

 Marriage Contracts: Individuals must have the capacity to marry, and this may vary
depending on jurisdiction (age, mental competency, and whether either party is already
married). A marriage contract that involves an individual with a lack of mental capacity may
be voidable.
 Divorce Agreements: When entering into settlements or agreements related to divorce,
parties must be of sound mind to make decisions regarding alimony, child custody, and
property division. If a party lacks mental capacity, these agreements may be challenged.

11. Mental Capacity vs. Legal Capacity

Mental Capacity refers to an individual's ability to understand the nature and consequences of their
actions when entering into a contract, while legal capacity pertains to whether the person is allowed
to engage in legal agreements under the law, regardless of mental condition.

 Mental Capacity: This refers to an individual's understanding of the contract, including the
terms, subject matter, and consequences. This could be impacted by mental illness, cognitive
impairment, intoxication, or other conditions.
 Legal Capacity: This refers to whether the person has the legal right to contract, which can
be restricted due to factors like age, marital status, or legal disability.

12. Consent and Duress

In the context of contract formation, even when a party has legal capacity, consent is still a crucial
element. If a party enters into a contract due to duress, undue influence, or fraud, their capacity to
freely consent to the terms may be compromised.

79 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Duress: A party may lack the capacity to freely consent to a contract if they were
forced or coerced into agreement (e.g., threats of harm, imprisonment, or economic
loss).
 Undue Influence: If one party takes advantage of a position of power over another (e.g.,
between a caretaker and a vulnerable person), the contract might be voidable because the
weaker party’s consent was not freely given.
 Fraud or Misrepresentation: If a party is misled about the terms or nature of a contract (e.g.,
through fraudulent misrepresentation or deception), they may not have the full mental
capacity to agree to the contract, and the contract may be voidable.

13. Capacity in International Contracts

In cross-border contracts, the capacity of parties may be influenced by international law and the
legal systems of the involved countries. Different legal systems can have different rules about the
capacity to contract, and this could present complexities when enforcing contracts across borders.
Key aspects include:

 Foreign Nationals: As mentioned, non-citizens might have restrictions on contracting in

certain countries.
 Cultural and Legal Norms: Cultural norms or religious laws (such as those governing
marriage or business contracts) can impact the enforceability of certain contracts.

14. Corporate Contracts and Authority

The capacity of corporations and other legal entities to contract hinges on the concept of corporate
authority. Even if the corporation itself has the legal capacity to enter contracts, the individuals
acting on behalf of the company (officers, directors, or agents) must have the proper authority.

 Actual Authority: A person has actual authority when they are explicitly authorized to act on
behalf of the corporation, either through their role or via specific instructions.
 Apparent Authority: A person may appear to have authority to bind the company, even if
they do not, if the company has allowed others to perceive them as having that authority.
 Ultra Vires Acts: If a corporation enters into a contract outside the scope of its legal powers
(called "ultra vires"), that contract might be void or unenforceable, especially if third parties
were not aware that the corporation was acting beyond its authority.

Conclusion

The capacity of parties is fundamental in determining whether a contract is legally binding. Whether
it's age, mental competency, intoxication, or the type of entity, the legal system ensures that
contracts are not only formed voluntarily but that they are enforceable and just. When a party lacks
the necessary capacity, they may have the ability to void or challenge a contract, preserving fairness
and preventing exploitation.

15. Contractual Capacity and Different Types of Agreements

While we’ve discussed general contract law principles, the type of contract involved can also impact
the enforceability and capacity to contract. Some agreements may have unique requirements or
restrictions:

80 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Consumer Contracts: In some jurisdictions, there are consumer protection laws that
limit the ability of certain individuals (such as minors or mentally incapacitated
persons) to enter into certain consumer contracts (e.g., for loans or credit).
 Employment Contracts: Some jurisdictions have specific regulations about the contractual
capacity of employees, especially when it comes to minors or individuals under legal
guardianship. These regulations are often designed to prevent exploitation in employment
relationships.
 Real Estate Contracts: Many real estate contracts are heavily regulated. For example, minors
may not be able to purchase property in some jurisdictions, but they may be able to buy real
estate with parental consent or through a court-approved guardian.

16. Contractual Capacity in the Context of Guardianship and Conservatorship Laws

 Guardianship and Conservatorship: If an individual has been legally declared to be unable to

manage their own affairs due to mental incapacity (as determined by a court), they may have
a court-appointed guardian or conservator who can make decisions on their behalf. This
would impact the capacity of the individual to enter into contracts.
 Court-Approved Contracts: A guardian or conservator may need to seek approval from the
court before entering into certain types of contracts on behalf of the incapacitated
individual. For example, the guardian may need court approval for large financial
transactions or decisions that affect the individual's estate.
 Guardianship in Minors: In the case of minors, a parent or legal guardian often has the
authority to make decisions on behalf of the minor, which includes entering into contracts
for necessities and for other agreements if allowed by law.

17. Capacity and Special Contracts

In certain cases, the law requires specific contracts to be in writing or executed in a formal manner
for them to be enforceable, and lack of capacity can be a significant issue in such cases:

 Wills and Testamentary Capacity: The capacity to create a valid will is a specific legal
concept, often distinct from the general capacity to contract. To make a valid will, an
individual must have testamentary capacity, which means they must understand the nature
and effects of their act (creating a will) and comprehend the extent of their property and the
identity of their beneficiaries.
 Powers of Attorney: A person who creates a power of attorney (a legal document granting
someone else the authority to act on their behalf) must have the mental capacity to
understand the implications of such a decision. If a person loses mental capacity after
granting power of attorney, the document may no longer be valid, and a court-appointed
guardian may take over.

18. The Role of Duress and Undue Influence in Capacity

Duress and undue influence don’t necessarily relate to the legal capacity of a party, but they do go
to the validity of the agreement. Even if the parties have the legal capacity to contract, if they are
forced or manipulated into a contract, their consent may be considered invalid.

 Duress: When a party is coerced into a contract through threats or pressure (e.g., threats of
harm, wrongful imprisonment, or economic harm), their ability to freely consent is
compromised. A contract formed under duress may be voidable.

81 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Undue Influence: In situations where one party exerts significant pressure on

another (e.g., a caregiver influencing an elderly person to sign a contract), this could
be considered undue influence. The law will look to see if the weaker party had free will in
entering the contract. If not, the contract could be voidable.

19. Capacity in the Context of Employment Law

In the context of employment contracts, capacity plays a critical role, especially in dealing with
individuals who might not fully understand the terms of employment, whether due to age, mental
condition, or intoxication. Here's a deeper dive into employment-related contractual capacity:

 Minors and Employment Contracts: As a general rule, a minor may enter into an
employment contract; however, such contracts are often subject to certain legal protections
for minors (e.g., restrictions on working hours, types of work, and contract enforcement).
Employers might be required to have parental consent or court approval for certain types of
employment contracts with minors.
 Intoxication in Employment Contracts: If an individual is intoxicated when entering into an
employment contract, the contract might be voidable. However, for employment contracts
specifically, the intoxication must generally be severe enough to impact the individual’s
understanding of the contract's terms.
 Mental Capacity in Employment Agreements: If an employee lacks mental capacity (due to
illness, injury, or a disability), their ability to enter into and be bound by a contract may be
called into question. Courts may examine whether the employee understood the nature of
the agreement and the consequences of entering into the contract.

20. Capacity and Family Contracts

In the context of family relationships, there may be restrictions on contract formation depending on
the situation:

 Marital Contracts: Spouses may have restrictions when entering into contracts with each
other. For instance, some jurisdictions may impose restrictions on certain contracts made
between spouses, especially if one party has a legal duty (e.g., providing support or care) or
the contract involves significant financial obligations.
 Divorce Agreements and Child Custody: Divorce agreements and child custody agreements
may also be impacted by one party’s capacity. If one party is deemed mentally incapacitated,
their ability to consent to terms such as alimony or custody arrangements may be
scrutinized. Courts ensure that all agreements made during divorce proceedings are fair and
entered into with full understanding by both parties.

21. The Legal Doctrine of Estoppel and Capacity

The doctrine of estoppel may prevent a party from arguing they lacked capacity in certain cases. If
someone has engaged in behavior that leads another party to reasonably believe they have the
capacity to enter into a contract, and the other party has relied on that belief, estoppel may apply.

 Estoppel by Representation: A party who represents themselves as having the capacity to

contract (e.g., by signing contracts, entering agreements, and participating in business
dealings) may not later argue they lacked capacity if it would unfairly harm the other party.

82 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Estoppel and Agency: Similarly, if a person represents another party as having the
authority to act on their behalf (even if the other person doesn’t), the principle of
estoppel may apply, binding the original party to the agreement.

22. Ratification of Contracts

A person who lacks the capacity to contract may later ratify or approve the contract once they gain
capacity. This concept is often used with minors or individuals who lack mental capacity but later
understand the terms of the agreement:

 Minors: If a minor enters into a contract that they are allowed to disaffirm (e.g., a contract
that is voidable by the minor), they can later choose to ratify it once they reach the age of
majority or if they continue to perform the contract after they gain legal capacity.
 Mental Incapacity: If a person who was mentally incapacitated enters into a contract during
their period of incapacity, they may ratify the contract once they regain mental competency.
However, there are specific rules about when and how a contract can be ratified, often
requiring explicit actions, such as continued performance.

Conclusion:

The concept of capacity in contract law is complex, involving several variables such as age, mental
condition, intoxication, guardianship, and even the nature of the contract itself. It's essential to
understand that contract law exists not only to uphold the agreement but also to protect individuals
who may be vulnerable due to lack of capacity. The law provides mechanisms for challenging
contracts made by individuals who were not legally capable of entering into them and offers
protections for those who might otherwise be exploited or coerced into agreements.

23. The Doctrine of Mental Incapacity and its Impact on Contract Formation

The law recognizes that mental incapacity isn’t a straightforward concept; it can range from
temporary conditions (such as intoxication) to permanent or long-term conditions (like dementia).
Here are some key issues related to mental incapacity in contract law:

 Permanent vs. Temporary Mental Incapacity: A permanent mental incapacity (such as a

condition like Alzheimer’s or severe intellectual disability) typically renders contracts entered
into by the individual voidable. However, a temporary condition, such as being intoxicated or
in a state of delirium, can lead to contracts being voidable but may require the individual to
prove that they lacked understanding at the time of signing.
 Assessing Mental Competency: In cases involving mental incapacity, courts typically look at
the individual’s ability to understand the nature of the contract and its consequences. This is
sometimes evaluated by expert testimony or medical evaluations, which can be crucial in
determining whether the individual had the mental capacity to enter into a binding
agreement.
 Contracts for Necessities and Mental Incapacity: Even if a person lacks mental capacity,
contracts for essentials (like food, medicine, or shelter) are usually enforceable. These items
are seen as necessary for survival, so the law often allows individuals lacking full mental
capacity to be held responsible for contracts involving them.

83 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

24. **Capacity in Business Law and Contracts: Authority and Agency

In business law, the capacity to contract is often not just about individual parties but can also involve
concepts of agency and corporate authority. When one party enters into an agreement on behalf of
a business or organization, their capacity and authority to act are crucial:

 Corporate Agents and Authority: In corporate law, the capacity of a corporation to contract
is exercised through its officers, directors, or agents. These individuals may have actual
authority (explicitly given power to act on behalf of the company) or apparent authority
(the perception that they have the authority, even if they do not).
o Actual Authority: This is authority granted by the corporation’s governing
documents or board of directors. For example, a CEO has actual authority to enter
into business contracts for the corporation.
o Apparent Authority: If a corporation allows an employee or officer to act in a way
that suggests they have the authority to make contracts, a third party might
reasonably rely on this appearance of authority. If the corporation attempts to argue
the agent had no authority, they may still be bound by the contract through the
doctrine of apparent authority.
 Ultra Vires Acts: Contracts entered into by a corporation that go beyond the scope of its
authorized purpose (known as "ultra vires" acts) may be deemed void or unenforceable. For
instance, if a company’s charter limits it to software development, any contracts related to
construction may be considered ultra vires.

25. Mental Illness and Its Effect on Contractual Capacity

When individuals suffer from mental illness, their capacity to contract may be challenged. Mental
illness can manifest in various forms, and the law recognizes varying levels of impairment. Courts
typically assess whether the individual’s illness affects their ability to understand the nature of the
contract or whether they were able to act rationally and voluntarily.

 Judicial Oversight: In many cases, especially for more severe mental illnesses, individuals
may have a guardian ad litem (a court-appointed advocate) or a conservator who represents
their interests in contractual matters. In such instances, any contract entered into by a
person under guardianship or conservatorship may be subject to additional legal scrutiny.
 Partial Mental Capacity: In certain instances, a person may be capable of understanding and
consenting to some types of contracts but not others. For example, an individual with a
mental disorder might be competent to handle smaller, routine contracts but may lack the
capacity to make decisions about complex financial agreements. Courts may decide that a
person with partial mental capacity has limited authority to contract, and this may affect the
enforceability of certain contracts.

26. Capacity and Contracts for Minors: Legal Safeguards and Exceptions

The capacity of minors (those under the age of majority, typically 18) to contract is highly regulated,
as they are generally presumed to lack the maturity and understanding to make binding legal
decisions. However, this is tempered by certain exceptions and legal safeguards:

 Voidable Contracts: As a general rule, contracts made by minors are voidable at the minor’s
discretion. That is, the minor has the right to disaffirm (cancel) the contract, generally within
a reasonable time after reaching the age of majority. Once the minor reaches adulthood,
they may choose to either ratify or void the contract.

84 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

 Necessaries: As mentioned earlier, contracts involving necessaries (such as food,

clothing, and shelter) are generally enforceable against minors. A minor may be held
liable for the reasonable value of necessities provided to them.
 Ratification: A minor may choose to ratify a contract upon reaching the age of majority. This
can be done either explicitly, through a statement, or implicitly, by continuing to perform
under the contract after turning 18.
 Disaffirmance: A minor can also disaffirm a contract by returning the goods (if possible) or
by making a clear statement that they no longer intend to be bound by the agreement. If the
goods cannot be returned (e.g., if they have been used or consumed), the minor may still be
entitled to disaffirm, but may owe compensation for any damage caused by the use.
 Contracts for Employment: In some jurisdictions, minors may enter into contracts for
employment or training with certain restrictions (e.g., limited working hours or types of
work). These employment contracts might still be considered voidable, but there are often
specific rules in place to protect minors.

27. Contractual Capacity and Intoxication (Including Drugs and Alcohol)

A person’s ability to contract while intoxicated (due to drugs or alcohol) can also raise questions
about their capacity. The key issue is whether the intoxicated individual was able to understand the
nature of the contract at the time it was entered into. This is a matter of degree: intoxication that
impairs reasoning and judgment significantly may be sufficient to render a contract voidable, but
mild intoxication may not.

 Severe Intoxication: If a party is so intoxicated that they do not understand the nature of the
agreement (e.g., so drunk or drugged that they cannot comprehend the terms of the
contract), they may have the ability to disaffirm the contract. However, this will often require
proof of the level of intoxication and the inability to comprehend the agreement.
 Mild Intoxication: If the intoxication was mild and the person could still understand the
nature of the contract, the contract may be upheld. The law generally doesn’t favor allowing
individuals to escape from contracts made under minor intoxication.
 Contracts Involving Substances of Abuse: If the intoxication results from the consumption of
illegal drugs, the situation becomes more complicated. Courts are unlikely to allow a defense
of intoxication in cases where the intoxication resulted from illegal drug use.

28. Ratification, Revocation, and Limitations of Disaffirmance

Once a person reaches the age of majority or regains mental competency, they may ratify a contract
they previously entered into while lacking capacity. However, there are legal limits on the time and
method of ratification or revocation:

 Ratification After Majority: A minor or an individual who lacked mental capacity can choose
to ratify a contract upon reaching legal capacity. This may be done through express words
(e.g., signing an agreement or confirming the contract in writing) or through implied
ratification (e.g., continuing to perform under the contract after reaching the age of
majority).
 Revocation or Disaffirmance: Disaffirming a contract (e.g., cancelling it due to lack of
capacity) typically needs to be done within a reasonable time after the person regains their
capacity. In some cases, failure to act promptly may lead to estoppel (preventing someone
from denying the contract due to delayed action).

85 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Conclusion:

The concept of capacity in contract law is multi-faceted and varies across different groups and
situations. While there are general rules regarding age, mental capacity, and intoxication, each case
requires a nuanced examination of the circumstances. The law provides protections for vulnerable
individuals, but also ensures that parties who have the capacity to understand and voluntarily agree
to contracts are bound by those agreements.

86 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Contract Law and Capacities of Parties: Multiple Choice Questions

(MCQs) with Answers:
1. What is the primary objective of contract law?

A) To protect the interests of the state

B) To govern the rights and obligations of the parties involved
C) To regulate business activities
D) To ensure that no party can breach a contract

Answer: B) To govern the rights and obligations of the parties involved

2. Which of the following is NOT an essential element of a contract?

A) Offer
B) Acceptance
C) Gift
D) Consideration

Answer: C) Gift

3. Who is competent to contract under Indian Contract Act, 1872?

A) Any person above the age of 21

B) Any person of sound mind and above the age of 18
C) Any person above the age of 25
D) Any person who has completed 16 years of age

Answer: B) Any person of sound mind and above the age of 18

4. Which of the following is a contract made by a minor?

A) Void
B) Voidable
C) Valid
D) Enforceable

Answer: A) Void

5. What is the effect of an agreement made by a person of unsound mind?

A) Valid
B) Voidable

87 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

C) Void
D) Enforceable by law

Answer: C) Void

6. Which of the following persons are disqualified by law from contracting?

A) Corporations
B) Convicts
C) Foreign Nationals
D) Non-residents

Answer: B) Convicts

7. Which one of the following is an essential element of a valid contract?

A) Mutual consent
B) Coercion
C) Influence
D) Fraud

Answer: A) Mutual consent

8. A contract is voidable when:

A) One party is a minor

B) One party is a convict
C) One party is of unsound mind
D) One party is coerced into signing

Answer: D) One party is coerced into signing

9. The essential feature of "capacity to contract" refers to:

A) The legal ability of a person to be part of a contract

B) The amount of consideration involved
C) The physical ability to perform the contract
D) The mental state of a person while entering into a contract

Answer: A) The legal ability of a person to be part of a contract

88 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

10. Which of the following is a valid contract for a minor?

A) Contract for necessities

B) Contract for a loan
C) Contract for the sale of land
D) Contract for partnership

Answer: A) Contract for necessities

11. A contract for sale made by a minor is:

A) Voidable
B) Valid
C) Void
D) Enforceable

Answer: C) Void

12. What happens if a person of unsound mind enters into a contract during a lucid interval?

A) The contract is voidable

B) The contract is valid
C) The contract is void
D) The contract is enforceable by law

Answer: B) The contract is valid

13. Which of the following is not considered "necessaries" under contract law for a minor?

A) Food
B) Clothing
C) Luxury items
D) Medicine

Answer: C) Luxury items

14. A contract made with a person who is under the influence of alcohol is:

A) Voidable
B) Void
C) Valid
D) Enforceable

Answer: A) Voidable

89 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

15. Which of the following is a disqualified person under the Indian Contract Act?

A) A person who is declared bankrupt

B) A person who has signed a contract under duress
C) A person who has passed 18 years of age
D) A person who is a foreign national

Answer: A) A person who is declared bankrupt

16. Which of the following contracts is voidable?

A) Contract made by a minor

B) Contract for an illegal object
C) Contract made with an unsound mind person during lucid interval
D) Contract made under duress

Answer: D) Contract made under duress

17. A contract that involves an illegal object is:

A) Void
B) Voidable
C) Valid
D) Enforceable by the court

Answer: A) Void

18. Consideration in a contract refers to:

A) The written form of the contract

B) The price paid for a service
C) The mutual exchange of promises or values
D) The legal advice given to the parties

Answer: C) The mutual exchange of promises or values

19. A contract is valid only when:

A) It is in writing
B) There is offer and acceptance
C) It involves financial exchange
D) It is signed in front of witnesses

90 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

Answer: B) There is offer and acceptance

20. Which of the following is a feature of a contract under the Indian Contract Act?

A) Must be in writing
B) Must involve two or more parties
C) Must be signed by all parties involved
D) Must be for a lawful object

Answer: D) Must be for a lawful object

21. An agreement without consideration is:

A) Voidable
B) Void
C) Valid
D) Enforceable

Answer: B) Void

22. In a contract, acceptance of an offer must be:

A) Expressed verbally
B) In writing only
C) Given within a reasonable time
D) Made by the offeror

Answer: C) Given within a reasonable time

23. A promise made without consideration is enforceable if:

A) The promise is in writing

B) The promise is made under seal
C) The promise is made to a minor
D) There is an agreement between family members

Answer: B) The promise is made under seal

24. What is the first essential of a contract?

A) Acceptance
B) Consideration

91 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

C) Offer
D) Capacity of the parties

Answer: C) Offer

25. A contract based on a fraudulent misrepresentation is:

A) Voidable
B) Valid
C) Void
D) Enforceable by law

Answer: A) Voidable

26. An agreement between two persons to perform an illegal act is:

A) Voidable
B) Void
C) Valid
D) Enforceable by court

Answer: B) Void

27. The term "capacity of parties" refers to:

A) The financial resources of the parties

B) The age and soundness of mind of the parties
C) The level of education of the parties
D) The legal representation of the parties

Answer: B) The age and soundness of mind of the parties

28. A contract in which one party has the power to unilaterally alter the terms of the agreement is
called a:

A) Void contract
B) Voidable contract
C) Unilateral contract
D) Bilateral contract

Answer: C) Unilateral contract

92 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

29. When can an offer be revoked?

A) At any time before acceptance

B) Only after 30 days
C) After the offer has been accepted
D) Only during business hours

Answer: A) At any time before acceptance

30. An agreement without an offer is:

A) Voidable
B) Void
C) Valid
D) Enforceable

Answer: B) Void

31. A contract made for illegal purposes is:

A) Valid
B) Voidable
C) Void
D) Enforceable by the court

Answer: C) Void

32. If a minor contracts for a loan, the contract is:

A) Voidable
B) Void
C) Enforceable
D) Valid with parental consent

Answer: B) Void

33. In the case of a contract by a person of unsound mind, the contract is:

A) Valid during lucid intervals

B) Valid if it’s a gift
C) Voidable by the other party
D) Void

Answer: D) Void

93 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

34. A contract in restraint of trade is:

A) Valid
B) Voidable
C) Void
D) Enforceable with court approval

Answer: C) Void

35. An agreement made under undue influence is:

A) Voidable
B) Void
C) Valid
D) Enforceable only if the contract is fair

Answer: A) Voidable

36. An agreement made under duress is:

A) Voidable
B) Void
C) Valid
D) Enforceable

Answer: A) Voidable

37. What does the term "agreement" imply in contract law?

A) A mutual promise
B) An offer only
C) Acceptance only
D) A promise to deliver goods

Answer: A) A mutual promise

38. If both parties to a contract have made a mistake about a fact that is material to the agreement,
the contract is:

A) Voidable
B) Void

94 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

C) Valid
D) Enforceable

Answer: B) Void

39. A person with a mental disorder can enter into a contract if:

A) They are lucid at the time of entering into the contract

B) They are represented by a guardian
C) They are below the age of 18
D) They are coerced into making the contract

Answer: A) They are lucid at the time of entering into the contract

40. A contract that involves a mistake of law is:

A) Voidable
B) Void
C) Valid
D) Enforceable by court

Answer: B) Void

41. The capacity to contract is limited for which of the following?

A) Minors
B) Persons who are intoxicated
C) Persons who are mentally unsound
D) All of the above

Answer: D) All of the above

42. A contract made with a person who has been declared insolvent is:

A) Voidable
B) Void
C) Valid
D) Enforceable only after bankruptcy proceedings

Answer: B) Void

95 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

43. The Indian Contract Act, 1872, covers which of the following?

A) Only contracts related to businesses

B) Only contracts between citizens
C) All types of contracts, including those related to sale, agency, and partnership
D) Only contracts made in writing

Answer: C) All types of contracts, including those related to sale, agency, and partnership

44. The offer must be communicated to the offeree for it to be:

A) Valid
B) Void
C) Voidable
D) Enforceable

Answer: A) Valid

45. A contract that is performed by one party is known as a:

A) Bilateral contract
B) Executed contract
C) Unilateral contract
D) Void contract

Answer: C) Unilateral contract

46. A promise without consideration is:

A) Void
B) Enforceable
C) Valid
D) Voidable

Answer: A) Void

47. In a contract, the term “consideration” refers to:

A) The legal formalities of the contract

B) The payment made to a third party
C) The mutual exchange of value
D) The terms and conditions of the contract

Answer: C) The mutual exchange of value

96 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)
 Diploma in Contract Management

48. A person under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of entering a contract is:

A) Bound by the contract

B) Not bound by the contract
C) Bound only if it is a valid contract
D) Bound only if the contract is in writing

Answer: B) Not bound by the contract

49. In a contract of partnership, the parties must be:

A) Above the age of 21

B) Mentally sound
C) Above the age of 18
D) All of the above

Answer: D) All of the above

50. If a minor enters into a contract for buying goods worth Rs. 100, the contract is:

A) Valid
B) Voidable
C) Void
D) Enforceable with parental consent

Answer: C) Void

97 | P a g e
Indian Institute of Skill Development Training (IISDT)