Struggle For National Survival Eugenics in Sinojapanese Contexts 18961945 Yuehsten Juliette Chung Latest PDF 2025
Struggle For National Survival Eugenics in Sinojapanese Contexts 18961945 Yuehsten Juliette Chung Latest PDF 2025
https://ebookbell.com/product/struggle-for-national-survival-
eugenics-in-sinojapanese-contexts-18961945-yuehsten-juliette-
chung-42818922
https://ebookbell.com/product/decolonization-and-the-struggle-for-
national-liberation-in-india-19091971-historical-political-economic-
religious-and-architectural-aspects-bilingual-thierry-di-costanzo-
editor-40666826
https://ebookbell.com/product/in-the-smaller-scope-of-conscience-the-
struggle-for-national-repatriation-legislation-19861990-2nd-edition-c-
timothy-mckeown-5735158
https://ebookbell.com/product/whose-history-the-struggle-for-national-
standards-in-american-classrooms-linda-symcox-2403138
https://ebookbell.com/product/hungarian-religion-romanian-blood-a-
minoritys-struggle-for-national-belonging-19201945-1st-edition-r-
chris-davis-51644066
The Struggle For The National Narrative In Indonesia Michael Hatherell
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-struggle-for-the-national-narrative-
in-indonesia-michael-hatherell-56378548
The Voting Rights War The Naacp And The Ongoing Struggle For Justice
National Association For The Advancement Of Colored
Peoplebrownemarshall
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-voting-rights-war-the-naacp-and-the-
ongoing-struggle-for-justice-national-association-for-the-advancement-
of-colored-peoplebrownemarshall-11902712
The Iran National Front And The Struggle For Democracy 1949present
Masoud Kazemzadeh
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-iran-national-front-and-the-
struggle-for-democracy-1949present-masoud-kazemzadeh-50337850
The Iran National Front And The Struggle For Democracy 1949present
Masoud Kazemzadeh
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-iran-national-front-and-the-
struggle-for-democracy-1949present-masoud-kazemzadeh-49443288
https://ebookbell.com/product/indian-national-congress-and-the-
struggle-for-freedom-18851947-illustrated-amales-tripathi-37624390
Discovering Diverse Content Through
Random Scribd Documents
issue. The Hon. Penn Assheton Curzon, just alluded to, eldest son of
Viscount Curzon, married Charlotte Sophia, Baroness Howe, by
whom he had issue seven sons and three daughters, the eldest of
whom was Richard William Penn Curzon-Howe, created Earl Howe,
who married twice—first, the Lady Harriet Georgiana Brudenell,
daughter of the Earl of Cardigan, by whom, with others, he had
issue the late Earl Howe; and, secondly, Ann Gore, maid of honour
to Queen Adelaide, by whom also he had issue. The Earl died in
1870, and was succeeded by his eldest son, George Augustus
Frederick Louis Curzon-Howe, as second Earl Howe, Viscount
Curzon, Baron Curzon of Penn, and Baron Howe of Langar, who was
born in 1821, and was M.P. for South Leicestershire from 1857 to the
time of his accession to the peerage. His lordship married, in 1846,
Harriet Mary, daughter of the late Henry Charles Sturt, Esq., M.P., by
whom, however, he had no issue. He died in 1876, and was
succeeded by his brother, the Hon. Richard William Penn Curzon-
Howe. The present peer, who is third Earl Howe, Viscount Curzon,
Baron Curzon of Penn, and Baron Howe of Langar, was born in 1822,
and, having entered the army, became Captain in 1844, Major 1853,
Lieut.-Colonel 1854, Colonel 1857, and Major-General 1868. Having
served in the Kaffir war as Aide-de-camp to Sir George Cathcart, and
at the siege of Delhi, at which time he was Acting Assistant
Quartermaster-General, he became Military Secretary to the
Commander-in-chief in India, and was also an Aide-de-camp to
H.R.H. the Duke of Cambridge. His lordship married, in 1858,
Isabella Katherine, daughter of Major-General the Hon. George
Anson, and has issue, besides other children, a son, the Hon. George
Richard Penn Curzon-Howe, who is heir to the titles and estates.
Sir Nathaniel Curzon died in 1758, and was succeeded by his
eldest son, Nathaniel Curzon, who, in 1761, was raised to the
peerage by the style and title of Baron Scarsdale of Scarsdale, in the
county of Derby—the title being derived from the hundred of
Scarsdale in that county. His lordship had previously married the
Lady Catherine Colyear, daughter of the Earl of Portmore, by whom
he had issue five sons and one daughter. He died in 1804, and was
succeeded in his title and estates by his eldest son, the Hon.
Nathaniel Curzon, as second Lord Scarsdale. This nobleman married,
first, the Hon. Sophia Susannah Noel, sister and co-heiress of
Thomas, Viscount Wentworth, by whom (who died in 1782) he had
issue the Hon. Nathaniel, who succeeded him, and the Hon. Sophia
Caroline, who married Robert Viscount Tamworth, son of Earl
Ferrars. Lord Scarsdale married, secondly, a Roman Catholic lady,
Félicité Anne de Wattines, of Tournay, in Belgium, by whom (who
died in 1850) he had, with other issue, the Hon. and Rev. Alfred
Curzon; the Hon. Francis James Curzon, barrister-at-law; the Hon.
Mary Elizabeth, married to John Beaumont, Esq., of Barrow; and the
Hon. Caroline Esther, married to William Drury Holden, Esq., of Locko
Park, in Derbyshire, who assumed the surname of Lowe instead of
that of Holden, and is well known as William Drury Lowe, Esq.
The Hon. Nathaniel Curzon succeeded his father as third Lord
Scarsdale in 1837, but died unmarried in 1856, when the title and
estates passed to his nephew, the present peer, the Rev. Alfred
Nathaniel Holden Curzon, second son of the Hon. and Rev. Alfred
Curzon, already mentioned.
The Hon. and Rev. Alfred Curzon, eldest son, by his second
marriage, of the second Lord Scarsdale, was born in 1801, and
married in 1825 Sophia, daughter of Robert Holden, Esq., of Nuttall
Temple, by whom he had issue two sons—George Nathaniel Curzon,
Esq., who was accidentally killed by being thrown from his horse,
and the Rev. Alfred Nathaniel Holden Curzon, the present Lord
Scarsdale—and two daughters, Sophia Félicité Curzon and Mary
Curzon, the elder being married to W. H. De Rodes, Esq., of
Barlborough Hall, and the younger to Lord Arthur Edwin Hill-Trevor,
son of the Marquis of Downshire. He died in January, 1850.
The present peer, the Rev. Alfred Nathaniel Holden Curzon,
succeeded his uncle in the title and estates as fourth Baron
Scarsdale, and as a baronet, in 1856. His lordship, who was born in
1831, was educated at Rugby, and at Merton College, Oxford, where
he graduated B.A. in 1852, and M.A. in 1865. In 1856 he became
Rector of Kedleston, and in the same year married Blanche, second
daughter of Joseph Pocklington Senhouse, Esq., of Nether Hall,
Cumberland, by whom he has issue living—the Hon. George
Nathaniel, heir-apparent, born 1859; the Hon. Alfred Nathaniel, born
1860; the Hon. Francis Nathaniel, born 1865; the Hon. Assheton
Nathaniel, born 1867; the Hon. Sophia Caroline, born 1857; the Hon.
Blanche Felicia, born 1861; the Hon. Eveline Mary, born 1864; the
Hon. Elinor Florence, born 1869; the Hon. Geraldine Emily, born
1871; and the Hon. Margaret Georgiana, born 1874. Lady Scarsdale
died in 1875. His lordship is patron of five livings (viz. Kedleston,
Quarndon, Mickleover, and Littleover, in Derbyshire, and
Worthington, in Leicestershire), and is a magistrate for the county of
Derby.
The arms of Lord Scarsdale are—
argent, on a bend, sable, three popinjays,
or, collared, gules. Crest—a popinjay
rising, wings displayed and inverted, or,
collared, gules. Supporters—dexter, a
female figure representing Prudence,
habited, argent, mantled, azure, holding in
her sinister hand a javelin, entwined with a Arms of Scarsdale.
remora, proper; sinister, a female figure
representing Liberality, habited, argent, mantled, purpure, holding in
both hands a cornucopia, resting against her shoulder, proper. Motto
—“Recte et suaviter.”
The title of “Scarsdale” had previously been held by the family of
Leake, but had become extinct. The Leakes were descended from
Adam de Leca, of Leak, in Nottinghamshire, who was living in 1141.
William Leake, or Leke, who settled at Sutton-in-the-Dale, or, as it is
frequently called, Sutton-Scarsdale, in Derbyshire, early in the
fifteenth century, was a younger son of Sir John Leake, of Gotham.
One of his descendants, Sir Francis Leke, Knt., married one of the
co-heiresses of Swift, of Rotherham, and by her had issue a son,
Francis Leke, who, on the institution of the order of baronetcy, was
created a baronet in 1611. In 1624 he was created Baron Deincourt
of Sutton, and, having taken an active part for the King during the
civil wars, was in 1645 raised to the dignity of Earl of Scarsdale. He
married Anne, daughter of Sir Edward Carey, Knt., and had issue by
her—Nicholas, his successor; Francis, Edward, and Charles, slain in
battle; and six daughters, one of whom was married to Viscount
Gormanston, and another to Charles, Lord Lucas. His lordship felt
the execution of his royal master, Charles I., so acutely, that he
clothed himself in sackcloth, and, causing his grave to be dug some
years before his death, laid himself in it every Friday for divine
meditation and prayer. He died in 1665, and was succeeded by his
son Nicholas as second Earl of Scarsdale and Baron Deincourt. This
nobleman married Lady Frances Rich, daughter of the Earl of
Warwick, and died in 1680. His eldest son, Robert, succeeded to the
titles and estates, and having married Mary, one of the co-heiresses
of Sir John Lewis, was made Lord-Lieutenant of Derbyshire, Colonel
of Horse, and Groom of the Stole to Prince George of Denmark.
Dying in 1707, he was succeeded, as fourth Earl of Scarsdale and
Baron Deincourt, by his nephew, Sir Nicholas Leke, who, dying
unmarried in 1736, the titles, including the baronetcy, became
extinct.
The old hall of Kedleston, the ancient
residence of the Curzon family for many
generations, stood nearly on the site
occupied by the present magnificent
mansion. It was a fine quadrangular brick
building of three stories in height, the
entrance being under an advanced
balustraded portico of three arches.
Adjoining the house were training
paddocks and all the appliances for the
stud which was kept up. Of this house,
fortunately, a painting is preserved in the
present mansion. Not so of the still older
house, of which no representation appears
Arms of Leke. to be remaining. It must, however, judging
from the records of the armorial bearings
which decorated its stained-glass windows when the survey was
made in 1667, have been a building possessed of many noticeable
features. In the north window of the hall of 1677 we find recorded
some of the bearings of the most distinguished families of the time,
which seem to throw a strong light on the connections of the Curzon
family. Among the arms, either alone or quartered or impaled, were,
it seems, in the north window of the hall, Curzon, Twyford, Arden,
Bek or Beke, Gresley, Wasteneys, Chandos of Radborne, Talbot,
Furnival, and Montgomery of Cubley; in the south windows those of
Curzon and Bagot; in another window those of Curzon, Vernon,
Ludlow, Poole or Pole, and the device of the House of Lancaster; at
the upper end of the hall, Curzon and Pole with Pole’s quarterings,
Curzon alone, Curzon and Vernon with Vernon’s quarterings, and
Curzon and Sacheverell with Sacheverell’s quarterings. About the
room the following coats were irregularly dispersed—viz.
Sacheverell, Vernon, Pole, Bagot, Montgomery, Ireton, Minors,
Curzon, Twyford, and Brailsford; and on the inside of the large
chimney of the Buttery were Touchet, Lord Audley of Marston, Erm,
a chevron and lion rampt, but the colours gone, and Latimer or
Greville (a cross fleury), and Frecheville. On the outside of the same
chimney, a saltier without colour; Montgomery as before; a border of
horse-shoes, probably Ferrers; Griffith of Whichnor, &c. These were
presumed to be about the date of Henry IV., and the door was
supposed at that time to be at least three hundred years old.
The old hall and the venerable church are said to have stood
about the centre of the then village of Kedleston, and a corn-mill
was near. The whole of the village, every house and every vestige of
habitation, the “small inn for the accommodation of those who came
to drink of a medicinal well, which has the virtues of the Harrogate
water,” the corn-mill, and the old hall itself, were removed by the
first Lord Scarsdale to make room for the present mansion, which he
erected in 1765: the church alone remained. The village was
removed to a charming spot a short distance off; the corn-mill was
taken away; the stream which turned its wheel was converted into
the magnificent lake that forms so fine a feature in the present park;
the turnpike-road was removed to a distance of more than half a
mile; and the “small inn” was replaced by the present capacious
Kedleston Inn, some three-quarters of a mile away from its original
site.
The present edifice was built from the designs of Robert Adam,
one of the architect brothers of the Adelphi, and is considered to be
his masterpiece. It consists of a noble central pile with two advanced
wings or pavilions, with which it is connected by two curved
corridors. The principal or north front has a grand central portico,
the entablature and pediment of which are supported by six
magnificent columns, 30 feet high, and 3 feet in diameter: some of
these are composed of one single stone their entire length. They are
designed from those at the Pantheon at Rome. The entrance in the
portico is approached by a double or reflected flight of stone steps,
which again are marvellous for the size of the stones: they are 10
feet in length, and each stone forms two steps. The pediment is
surmounted by figures of Venus, Bacchus, and Ceres, and the
sculptured bassi-relievi (by Collins) represent vintage, pasturage,
harvest, ploughing, and boar-hunting; while within the porticos are
statues of a Bacchante, two of the Muses, and a Vestal. The Arcade,
leading to Cæsar’s Hall, and the Corridors, are designed from the
Amphitheatre. The Grand Entrance is in the centre of the portico,
and opens at once into the Great Hall.
(the latter word, of course, not being there, but implied by the dial
itself): the meaning is, “We shall die all,” or, “We shall all die.”
The Lodge.
Lord Suffolk was married twice: first, to Mary, sister and co-
heiress of Thomas, Lord Dacres of Gillesland, by whom he had no
issue; and, secondly, to Elizabeth, daughter and co-heiress of Sir
Henry Knevett, of Charlton, and widow of Richard, eldest son of Lord
Rich, by whom he had four daughters—viz. Elizabeth, who married
successively William Knolles, Earl of Banbury, and Edward, Lord
Vaux; Frances, married first to Robert Devereux, Earl of Essex, from
whom she was divorced, and next to Robert Carr, Earl of Somerset,
Margaret; and Catherine, married to William Cecil, Earl of Salisbury—
and eight sons, viz. Theophilus, who succeeded him; Sir Thomas,
who was created Earl of Berkshire, and is the direct ancestor of the
present Earl of Suffolk and Berkshire—the earldom of Suffolk having
reverted to this branch in 1733—whose descendants later on
succeeded to the titles; Henry, who married Elizabeth Bassett, of
Blore, by whom he had a daughter, Elizabeth, who became
successively the wife of Sir John Howard, of Swarkeston, in
Derbyshire, and of William Cavendish, Duke of Newcastle; Sir
Charles; Sir Robert, “a gallant cavalier soldier, was but too notorious
in his own day for his intrigue with the Viscountess Purbeck, the
beautiful and ill-assorted daughter of the Chief Justice Coke;” Sir
William; Sir John; and Sir Edward, who was created Baron Howard
of Escrick.
The first Earl of Suffolk built the magnificent mansion of Audley
End, over which he is stated to have expended the enormous sum,
for those days, of more than £190,000. It is said of him that
although he had, from his many high and lucrative offices and his
large estates, more ample means of displaying his magnificence than
had any of his ancestors, he eclipsed them all in extravagance and
show. His wife, Lady Suffolk, too, “was unfortunately a woman of a
covetous mind, and having too great an ascendancy over her
husband, used it in making him a party to her extortions on persons
who had business to transact at the Treasury, or places to obtain at
Court; and her husband was charged with embezzlement, deprived
of his office, and fined £30,000, but which was reduced by the King
to £7,000. He was generally considered to have been chiefly guilty in
concealing the malpractices of his wife, who eventually died in debt
and difficulty.” Probably one great reason for these things being laid
to his charge was that, through having for a son-in-law the fallen
and disgraced courtier Robert Carr, Earl of Somerset, he had become
obnoxious to the new favourite, Buckingham, through whose
influence it appears he and his countess were, for a short time,
committed to the Tower. He died at Suffolk House (where Suffolk
Street, Strand, now stands), in 1626, and was buried at Walden. He
was succeeded by his eldest son, Theophilus Howard (who during
his father’s lifetime had been summoned to Parliament as Lord
Howard of Walden) as second Earl of Suffolk. He was a Knight of the
Garter, Lord Warden, Chancellor, and Admiral of the Cinque Ports,
Constable of Dover Castle, &c., and married Elizabeth, daughter and
co-heiress of the Earl of Dunbar, by whom he had issue four sons
and five daughters, three of the sons becoming successively Earls of
Suffolk.
He was succeeded by his son James (third Earl of Suffolk), who,
like his father, for a time resided at Audley End in quiet retirement.
The cost of the building had so greatly involved the first earl that, at
the time of his committal to the Tower, he was about £40,000 in
debt, although he had then but recently sold the Charter House to
Mr. Sutton for £13,000, and his property at Aynhoe, in
Northamptonshire, for a considerable sum. The charges thus
entailed on the estate, and the cost of maintaining it, so affected his
successors that they were unable to support an establishment
commensurate with the size and magnificence of the house. After
the Restoration, Earl James, therefore, gladly took the opportunity
which offered of selling the park and mansion of Audley End to the
King, Charles II.
The purchase-money of this estate (which, as already stated, in
building alone had cost £190,000) was £50,000, of which but
£30,000 was paid by the King, the remaining £20,000 being left on
mortgage. This was in 1666, and in 1670 the Court was regularly
established at Audley End; the Queen very frequently resided there;
and, being convenient for Newmarket, festivities were kept up on a
large scale.
After the sale of the house, the Earl of Suffolk and his successor,
the fourth earl, resided in comparative retirement, Audley End being,
by the King, “committed to the charge of one of the family, who held
the office of housekeeper and keeper of the wardrobe, with a salary;
and this arrangement continued till 1701, when the house and park
were reconveyed” back to the Suffolk family. The £20,000 left on
mortgage continued unpaid by the King at the revolution of 1688,
“nor is it clear that any interest had ever been paid upon it” during
the many years it had remained. In 1701, therefore, the demesne
was, as just stated, conveyed back to the Howards, the fifth Earl of
Suffolk, on receiving it, relinquishing his claim on the Crown for the
debt.
James, the third Earl of Suffolk, already spoken of, married, first,
Susan, daughter of the Earl of Holland, by whom he had an only
daughter, Essex, married to Edward, Lord Griffin of Braybrooke;
secondly, Barbara, daughter of Sir Edward Villiers and widow of Sir
Richard Wenman, by whom he had a daughter, who became the wife
of Sir Thomas Felton; and, thirdly, to Anne, daughter of the Earl of
Manchester, by whom he had no issue. Dying in 1688, he was
succeeded by his brother, George Howard, as fourth earl, who
enjoyed the title only three years; when, dying without surviving
male issue, he was succeeded by his brother, Henry Howard, as fifth
earl. This nobleman married twice: first, Mary, daughter of Lord
Castle Stewart, by whom (besides a daughter) he had three sons—
Henry, Edward, and Charles—who each successively became Earl of
Suffolk; and, secondly, the widow of Sir John Maynard, by whom he
had no issue. He died in 1709, and was succeeded by his eldest son,
Henry Howard, created in his father’s lifetime Baron Chesterford and
Earl of Bindon, who was succeeded by his eldest son, Charles
William, as seventh Earl of Suffolk, and second Earl of Bindon and
Baron of Chesterford. He married Elizabeth, daughter of Sir Thomas
Astrey, but had no issue; and, dying in 1721-2, the titles of Baron of
Bindon and Earl of Chesterford became extinct, while those of Earl of
Suffolk and Baron Howard of Walden passed to his father’s brother
Edward, and, at his death, to his brother Charles, as ninth earl. He
dying in 1733, left one only son, Henry Howard, who thus became
tenth Earl of Suffolk. This tenth earl married Sarah, daughter of
Thomas Irwin, but died without issue in 1745, his widow afterwards
becoming the wife of Viscount Falkland.
On the death of the tenth earl, the title of Earl of Suffolk, &c.,
passed to his distant relative, Henry Bowes Howard, Earl of
Berkshire, Viscount Andover, &c., who, descended from Sir Thomas
Howard, second son of the first Earl of Suffolk, was direct ancestor
of the present Earl of Suffolk and Berkshire, the barony of Howard
de Walden remaining in abeyance between the descendants of the
two co-heiresses of the third earl.
These were, as already shown, Essex, wife of Edward, Lord
Griffin of Braybrooke, and Elizabeth, wife of Sir Thomas Felton. The
representatives of the elder of these were the Hon. Elizabeth Griffin,
married, first, to Henry Neville Grey, and, secondly, to the Earl of
Portsmouth; and her sister, Ann, wife of William Whitwell. Lady
Portsmouth having no issue by either of her husbands, the real
descent lay with the son of Mrs. Whitwell, in whose favour the
abeyance terminated, and who thus became Lord Howard of
Walden. The possession of the Audley End estates was disputed by
Thomas Howard, second Earl of Effingham, who claimed under a
settlement in his favour, made by the seventh Earl of Suffolk, who,
however, having been proved to have himself only been a tenant for
life, the claim was disallowed, and the estates passed to Lady
Portsmouth, from whom, by bequest, they ultimately came to John
Griffin Whitwell, Lord Howard of Walden.
This nobleman was created Baron Braybrooke in 1788, with
remainder to his relative, Richard Neville, whose father, Richard
Aldworth, was maternally descended from the Nevilles; and, dying
without issue, the title of Lord Howard of Walden passed to a distant
descendant of that family. He was succeeded, as second Baron
Braybrooke, in 1797, by this Richard Neville, who assumed the name
of Griffin. He married, in 1780, Catherine, daughter of the Right
Hon. George Grenville, who was maternally descended from
Theophilus, second Earl of Suffolk, and sister of the first Marquis of
Buckingham, and had by her, besides other issue, the Hon. Richard,
who succeeded him, and who, by arrangement with the deceased
peer’s only sister and heiress (wife of the Rev. Dr. Parker), obtained
immediate possession of the mansion and unentailed portion of the
estate, the other portion coming to him at the death, without issue,
of that lady.
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.
ebookbell.com