Christology
Christology
Carmelo Martines
CHRISTOLOGY
DOCTRINE OF CHRIST
INTRODUCTION
Christology is the study and science of Christ and his relationship with the universe.
and especially with man.
2. Theology has united the person and work of Christ in an indissoluble way. In
in this sense, Christology studies the person of Christ and soteriology its
work.
3. This study will address the aspect of the person of Christ.
4. Regarding the study of the person of Christ, there are two methods:
Christology from above
Christology from below
The first method takes into account the aspects of divinity, the incarnation.
and the humanity of Christ.
The second method takes into account the history of Christ from his birth.
until his ascension. In fact, this method is often referred to as
Jesusology
5. What are the foundations of a Christology? Scripture itself. In Luke
24:25-27 and 44 Christ declares that the Scripture (understand still the OT) is
the guidelines to understand Him. Christ interpreted the Old Testament in a
Christological.
The following text Mt 16:16-17 is in the context of Jesus' question about
his identity, Peter's confession to Christ is nothing more than a revelation,
avpeka,luye,n,Christologyisnotmerelyamentalspeculationofthetype
theological but a true revelation. Without revelation, we would not know
Christ.
Hebrewxv;m' →x;yvim'
Greek cry,w → Christ,
Latin to anoint
There are two passages in the OT that explicitly announce the preexistence of the Messiah.
Isaiah 9:6 'Everlasting Father' according to verse 7 is God who gives the name.
Micah 5:2 the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem, but He is preexistent.
But he answered and said, "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
1
Notes – Dr. Carmelo Martines
For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many.
For the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost.
No one has ascended into heaven except he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man.
Explicit statements
IamAbraham.
Jesus said to them, 'Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.'
I'mgoingback eivmi,vipa--1s
The relationship between Abraham and Christ is one of contrast. Abraham comes to be
It has a temporal beginning and is caused by another. In contrast, Christ uses the
Verb to be. The peculiarity is in the use of the verbal mood in the present, if Christ
I would have used the expression "I was" in the imperfect tense.
Such a statement could apply to an angel preexisting to Abraham. The 'I am'
He always is. The Jews understood this, which is why they wanted.
to stone him.
Now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.
Other statements
John the Baptist This is he of whom I said, 'After me comes a man who ranks before me, because he was before me.'
Pablo For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so that you through his poverty might become rich.
Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus: who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men.
Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever.
The Latin versions before the Vulgate translated the term as "unicus".
Jerome translated it as 'only begotten' due to Christological controversies. Marco
historical: councils of Nicaea 325, Chalcedon 451 and Basil with his distinction between
the Father as generator, the Son as generated. Therefore, by virtue of the dogma
Ecclesiasticus translated the Christological passages as 'only begotten'. And thus it influenced
other translations.
2
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
Conclusion. The passage that most clearly reveals the meaning of the term is Heb.
11:17, Isaac is unique, not the only son. Ishmael was born 13 years earlier (Gen 16:16) and six
Abraham had more children with Keturah (Genesis 25). Isaac was "the only one" in his.
class, he was the son of the promise, son of a miracle.
In this sense, Jesus is unique:
In relation to the Father (Jn 5:17)
In relation to the revelation (John 1:18)
In relation to his redeeming work (John 3:18)
Explanation. Col 1:15 refers to the character and dignity of Christ and not that he was the
first creature. Christ has the prerogatives and authority of the
primogeniture.
3
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
Heb 1:6 God cannot ask for worship for someone who had a beginning, see Ro
1:25.
Christ was not literally the firstborn of the dead but Abel, therefore not.
he would be of the resurrection, was Moses and he would not be the first to go to heaven,
He was Enoch. But he is first among them all in category, rank, and by greater weight.
of glory.
The term applied to Christ: Acts 13:33, Hebrews 1:5 and 5:5.
All the mentioned texts cite Psalms 2.
Context of Psalms 2. Conspiracy of the enemies of Israel. The anointed one appears.
The king is enthroned and is given promises of encouragement and victory. The 'today I have'
"Engendered" should be understood in a figurative sense, it is the day when the king is
enthroned and as a servant of God, he will guide the destinies of his people.
Uses applied to Christ. Acts 13:33 Paul quotes Psalms 2, the resurrection gives rise
to the ascension and the subsequent enthronement. Heb 1:5 Christ is greater than the
angels (a warning against angel worship). Heb 5:5 enthroned as high priest
priest. Let us remember the baptism of Jesus and the voice from heaven that declared: "This
"This is my beloved Son" (Mt 3:17).
Quote from Ellen G. White: 'When speaking of His preexistence, Christ transports the
mind towards the past through the endless ages. It assures us that there was never
a time when He was not in close communion with the Eternal Father. That
whose voice the Jews were listening to had always been one with the Father
Sing of the Time, August 29, 1900 (The Evangelism 446).
Today the Christological pendulum movement places more emphasis on the human aspect of Jesus.
2. NT Statements
John 1:1
God is o` lo,goj
c the boy goes to the market
y God was the Verb
4
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
According to grammar:
The 1st rule: noun without article, in the translation it can be translated with a
indefinite article or not. In Greek, there is no indefinite article, e.g.:
They brought to himparalutiko.
a paralytic
nevpi.♦kli,onnhj
lying a beblhme,
bed. When
nonJesus saw their faith, he said to the paralytic, 'Take heart, my son; your sins are forgiven.'
they brought the paralyzed man lying on 'a' bed
And behold, a woman of Canaan came out from that region and cried out to Him, saying, 'Have mercy on me, O Lord, Son of David! My daughter is severely demon-possessed.' ivdou.♦gunh.Cananai,a
Here is 'a' Canaanite woman
BUT here is the 2nd rule: If the subject has the copulative verb 'to be,' the noun
the predicate goes without an article, as is the case in Jn 1:1.
Now, what is the reason for this rule? To distinguish the subject from the predicate.
Observe the following example:
In this case, the subject and predicate are interchangeable just like the
The teacher was the principal.
Three logical and grammatical conclusions
First: if in the phrase of Jn 1:1 the two nouns were with an article
defined, it would have been very confusing to understand, it is the example of Jn 1:4.
Second: if in the phrase of John 1:1 the article was overqeuo.
reduced all divinity to Christ alone. See the following example:
No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.
John 20:28 is not an exclamation; it would have been in the vocative.
Romans 9:5
Looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.
But of the Son He says, 'Your throne, O God, is forever and ever; A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom.'
5
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martinez
Creator: Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.
2. Biblical declarations
And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.
Galatians 4:4
Who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men.
6
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
If he is not God incarnate, his death is not a substitute, but merely exemplary.
It is to be assumed that upon fulfilling His mission on earth, Christ then after His
Did the resurrection and ascension abandon his human nature?
The texts do not confirm this assumption.
Resurrection: Luke 24:37-43.
John 20:20-29, the wounds of the cross
they remain.
Ascension 1 Timothy 2:5 mediator 'Jesus Christ man'.
EGW Quotes: '...God gave His only begotten Son so that He could become
member of the human family, and would hold forever its
human nature","DTG17; "Christ had ascended to heaven in
human form",DTG771; "Christ has carried His humanity to the
eternity", Youth ’s Instructor October 28, 1897; "I carry that
humanity with the heavenly courts, and throughout the centuries
eternal will hold her, like He who redeemed every human being
what is in the city of God,” CBA6:1054.
7
Notes – Dr. Carmelo Martines
Pablo For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man.
Gospels nothing.
8
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
Discussion topic
In the last decade of the nineteenth century, Alonso T. Jones began to express
that Christ took the complete nature of man, and clarifies that God
manifested in Christ in 'sinful flesh', in order to demonstrate before the
universe, which with the fallen nature, Christ was able to overcome temptations.
Position shared by Waggoner and Prescott.
In the third decade of the 20th century, Milian L. Andreasen organizes these
ideas in what is called 'the theology of the last generation'. According to
Andreasen Christ with his fallen human nature defeated sin, of
this way the last generation will demonstrate that it is possible to live without sinning, and
that demonstration is the vindication of God. The current author who has
continued with these ideas is Herbert E. Douglass. The latter establishes the
"harvest principle", the coming of the Lord is conditioned on the
spiritual quality of the last generation. Douglass establishes the
comparison between Christ and the last generation. The life of Christ and his
victory over sin, in its fallen human nature, is essential for
understand the last generation and their victory over sin.
The reaction to these ideas began in 1957 with the publication of Questions
on Doctrines where the Christological presentation supports the concept of the
fallen nature of Christ. Theologians such as Heppenstall, Dederen and
LaRondelle expanded this conception further.
9
Notes – Dr. Carmelo Martines
1 John 3:5
10
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
Raised objections
11
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
he humbled himself, becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.
Flowchart
YouareinChristJesus
Asforthedivinenature,beingthesource
hecameupwithaplan.
to.itisthegod
Isee.Itisautomatic.
morfh.ndou,loulabw,n
EvenifIamcondemned,Iwilliveforever.
And,whenhewasraisedup,hehumbledhimselfasaman.
geno,Iamjustyourfriend,howareyoutoday?
youarehere.tobecrucified
Semantic considerations
morph/|formofGodandformofaservant,natureorconditionofabeing,what
It is essential this means that Christ was fully God and fully man.
Christ was 100% 100 divine and 100% 100 human.
u`pa,rcwser or to exist, the verbal form of the present participle indicates that without
stop being what it is, it becomes something else.
to arrive, to come into being, in this case the verb indicates that
Christ becomes man at a given moment without ceasing to be God.
Divine condition is pre-existing to the later human condition.
itisanadjectivethatestablishesanabsoluteequality,ChristwasequaltoGodseeJn
5:18 "he who does good is with God."
In these two texts, when Christ is to be equated with God; the term
appropriate and no other.
oh mine, such a resemblance, does not establish an absolute equality, the text
carefully marks a substantial difference, Christ is equal to God in
absolute terms, but not equal to man in absolute terms, the difference
it is not in human nature but in the sinfulness or corruption of it
nature; in this, Christ is not absolutely equal to us, He does not have
tendencies to sin.
Explanation: sin is constitutional to man, since Adam and Eve.
Sin fell and became part of human nature.
Sin is not essential to human nature, when Adam and Eve were
created did not have tendencies towards sin, their nature was not corrupted nor
affected. That is to say, Adam and Eve did not need sin to be human.
With Christ, the same happens, although at birth I inherit the weakness of the race.
human, not so the corruption or tendency to sin. Christ was essentially
human without those tendencies. That is why this Greek term 'moi' only highlights the
no constitutionality of sin in Christ but not its human essentiality
expressed in the term morphh/|.
12
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
Keno,whatisthemeaningofthetermtoemptyoneselfortobestunned?Inlakenosis
Did Christ lose His divinity by taking on human nature? Did Christ
Did it lose some of its attributes, such as omniscience or omnipresence? No.
Christ was not less God and less man. His divinity remained.
integrate in the incarnation, key text Col 2:9 "for in him dwells all the fullness bodily"
fullness of the Deity.
So how to understand lakenosis? Not as a change of nature but a
change of status. He does not leave his attributes but rather his condition of royalty. EGW
It mentions that Christ, upon becoming incarnate, left: heaven, his throne, his crown. The text of
Philippians specifies that lakenosis means: to take the form of a servant, to humble oneself.
to himself, to be obedient unto death and his death on the cross. Lakenosises the
self-denial of his submission by man.
1st In the moral and spiritual: closer to Adam than to us, innocent
exempt from sin, diametrically opposed to our corrupt nature and
sinful.
13
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
14
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
John 1:1
15
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
Jesus said to them, 'Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.'
IamtheAbrahamgene.
adv. n. masc gw
i, eareafraid pron.eivmi,vipa--
1s
16
Notes – Dr. Carmelo Martines
Letthismindbeinyou,whichwasalsoinChristJesus:who,beingintheformofGod,thoughtitnotrobberytobeequalwithGod:butmadehimselfofnoreputation,andtookuponhimtheformofaservant,andwasmadeinthelikenessofmen:andbeingfoundinfashionasaman,hehumbledhimself,andbecameobedientuntodeath,eventhedeathofthecross.
FLOW CHART
ThemindofChristJesusisamongyou.
OGod,existingineveryform.
hewasleadingwithauthority
to.eij=naii;saqew
avlla.e`auto.nevke,nwsen
morfh.ndou,loulabw,n(
Iamplanningtogotothemarkettobuysomeitems.
ForIwastreatedasamanwhenIwashumbled.
e`auto.n
Iloveyougreatly,mydear.
Qana,youare.Staurou
17
Notes – Dr. Carmelo Martines
Appendix
JOINT STATEMENT
We, the attendees of the VII South American Biblical-Theological Symposium, driven by the
deepest desire to exalt Christ above all animated and inanimate things of
universe, together with God the Father and the Holy Spirit, and recognizing the presence of Christ
crucified in the hope of his second coming, which we all believe, we adopt the following
JOINT STATEMENT:
1. We reaffirm our total commitment to faith, hope, conduct, and mission with the
biblical-adventist christology.
2. We reaffirm that the source of this Christology is Sacred Scripture. Scripture was
revealed by God, and granted to human beings through the Holy Spirit who
he inspired holy men of God, to pre-announce Jesus Christ, his person, his work, his
uniqueness and to make it known as the incarnate God, as the unique-sufficient redeemer
and as blessed hope in his second coming.
3. We reaffirm that the hermeneutical principle for the Christological understanding of the
Scripture interprets itself within the framework of the great conflict.
between good and evil that began with the rebellion of Luzbel in heaven and will conclude
with the final judgment and the definitive destruction of the evil one and his followers.
4. We reaffirm the full divinity and complete humanity of Christ. The person of
Christ, as God incarnate, possessed two natures: one divine, the other human.
Totally God, totally man. Divine-human. As God, He was co-eternal with
the Father. He hid his divinity in humanity through the incarnation, in order to
offer the unique and sufficient redemptive sacrifice, on the cross and redeem all those who in
He creates for eternal life. As a man, Christ inherited the weaknesses inherent to the
human nature after four thousand years of sin: suffered the same
needs of all humans. But he did not have sinful passions, nor
any propensity towards evil. With the possibility of sinning, he was tempted in everything, but
without sin and without sin.
5. We reaffirm that Christ's vicarious death on the cross and his resurrection from the
the dead were literal acts that assure the redemption and salvation of all
those who accept it.
6. We reaffirm the Christological reality of the united church as the body of Christ (Eph
1:22, 23). The church possesses a diversity of gifts, talents, and functions granted to
she through the Holy Spirit, who, exercised under the guidance of the same Spirit,
they build the unity of the church in doctrine, in organization, in lifestyle, and in
missionary action; making it one, with one mind, the mind of Christ.
We reaffirm our determination to live intimately connected with Christ.
This means that we accept his vicarious sacrifice on the cross, his redemption, his
salvation, His will, His intercession, and His church. Christ has interceded and intercedes,
for us, sinners, in the heavenly sanctuary, fulfilling a double ministry,
formerly typified by the priestly ministry, carried out in the two
departments of the sanctuary-temple of Israel: in the holy place, for forgiveness of the
sins and in the holy of holies, for vindication in the judgment. Thus assuring life
eternal for all who believe in Christ and live with Him.
18
Notes - Dr. Carmelo Martines
19