COMMENTS RESOLUTION SHEET (CRS)
Project: ROYAL ROSEWOOD RESORT MALDIVES Incoming Drawing/Document Details
Contractor: URBACON TRADING & CONTRACTING , QATAR Doc. No. UCC871-UCC-RFC-STR-MW-001 Docs Rev: 1
Reviewed By (SCG): Name: Amr Hassan Position: Structural Engineer Title: Overwater Walkway Precast Structural System Date Rec: 6-May-25
Reviewed By (SCG): Name: Mohamed bahgat Position: Structural Discipline Lead Discipline: ST Approval
C
Code:
SCG Trans. No. Doc Type: RFC
Drawing Part /
Contractor Response
Item Reviewer's Name Reviewer Comments
Doc. Section
1st Clarification Shaker Remarks 2nd Clarification Shaker Remarks Status (O/C)
precast connections doesnot provide rigidity for the lateral resistance systems
considered in IFC, provide full analytical model and illustrate the lateral
comment addressed, Calculation provided, comments on
1 AH resisting framing considered taking into consideration the loads in IFC closed
calculation will be demonstrated down.
drawings and Marine with the design of all elements along with lifting design
calculation.
Comment not addressed
A)Concrete corbel bearing capacity between beam and corbel
PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATION OF THE BEARING / CORBEL check is missing. Please include verification to ensure bearing
2 AH open
CONNECTION stresses are within allowable limits for Pb1 and Pb3.
B)dowels design Calculation is missing.
total timber zone to be confirmed,as in concept stage input from UCC total
3 AH timber zone is 225 + 45 mm of 270 mm, to be coordinated with timber no further comments closed
designer.
General Comment
4 AH no further comments closed
width of the bridge has been increased, to be subjected to arch / landscape
5 AH beam PB3 size not matching the IFC, provide the design of the beam no further comments,Calculation provided closed
General Comment
6 AH width of the MEP zone has been decreased, to be subjected to MEP for no further comments closed
approval.
General Comment General Comment
7 AH total depth has been increased, for timber side coverage , subject to landscape total depth has been increased, for timber side coverage , open
/ arch for approval. subject to landscape / arch for approval.
Comment not addressed,
8 AH provide expansion joint details and spacing in master plan drawings expansion joint provided but open
expansion joint details are missing.
load Combinations the wave loading FP takes the same safety
Calculation factor as dead load , please provide reference or use 1.6 with
9 AH open
page 13 LRFD and 1.0 with ASD , with wind and live load as governing
case.
Note on Connection Modeling Assumptions:
In the structural model, beam ends are assigned partial (50%)
and full (100%) fixity, resulting in negative moments at column
supports. However, the reinforcement drawings do not show
top reinforcement continuing over the column at the relevant
support location. This raises a concern about how the assumed
fixity—and thus the moment capacity at the support—is being
achieved in practice. Without proper top reinforcement, the
Calculation connection cannot realistically provide the rigidity assumed in
10 AH open
page 24 the analysis.
while in case of simply supported beams , the lateral system
will be cantilever column which will affect the slenderness of
the column as the effective length will be doubled, drift and
design moment will increase.
Kindly provide a representative case where the structural
drawings and corresponding calculations clearly match and
support one another.
UCC871-UCC -
due to absence of concrete slab, beam torsion modifier should
SD -STR -OW
11 AH be 1, check if closed stirrups required for beam design open
-GF -DT -
especially PB2 due to cases of loading of spans.
0102-2/4
MEP comments
Revision 0
Dated 8th July 2018
Page 1 of 2
Drawing Part /
Item Reviewer's Name Reviewer Comments
Doc. Section
1st Clarification Shaker Remarks 2nd Clarification Shaker Remarks Status (O/C)
The section submitted by the contractor is not feasible from an
electrical operational standpoint due to the following issues:
UCC871-UCC - 1- The MV cable is proposed to be installed on a cable ladder
SD -STR -OW beneath the LV cable ladder. This arrangement will restrict
12 open
-GF -DT - access to inspect or replace the MV cable without dismantling
0401 the LV layer above , our proposal to use the same criteria used
in ITHAFUSHI to be installed inside conduits .
The section submitted by the contractor is not feasible from an
electrical operational standpoint due to the following issues:
UCC871-UCC -
2- The significant overlap between the lower and upper cable
SD -STR -OW
13 layers further hinders accessibility, making it difficult to check open
-GF -DT -
or replace the lower cables without removing the upper ones ,
0401
our proposal make significant overlap around 350mm to
change the cables in lower level easily .
ARCHITECTURAL comments
UCC871-UCC -
SD -STR -OW Architechtural design to be reviewed by IDCC, sections and
14 open
-GF -DT - elevations to be submitted for approval.
0401
Contractor shall attach completed CRS with next submission with responses to the Reviewers Comments.
__________________________________________ _______________________________________________
SHAKER REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE
Resident Engineer POSITION
Revision 0
Dated 8th July 2018
Page 2 of 2
