Remote Sensing Monitoring and Evaluation of Degraded

Grassland in China: Accounting of Grassland Carbon

Source and Carbon Sink Wei Zhou download

https://textbookfull.com/product/remote-sensing-monitoring-and-
evaluation-of-degraded-grassland-in-china-accounting-of-grassland-
carbon-source-and-carbon-sink-wei-zhou/

★★★★★
4.9 out of 5.0 (95 reviews )

Get PDF Instantly

textbookfull.com
 Remote Sensing Monitoring and Evaluation of Degraded
Grassland in China: Accounting of Grassland Carbon Source
and Carbon Sink Wei Zhou

TEXTBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library

More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

Forest Carbon Practices and Low Carbon Development in

China Zhi Lu

https://textbookfull.com/product/forest-carbon-practices-and-low-
carbon-development-in-china-zhi-lu/

15N Tracing of Microbial Assimilation Partitioning and

Transport of Fertilisers in Grassland Soils Alice Fiona
Charteris

https://textbookfull.com/product/15n-tracing-of-microbial-
assimilation-partitioning-and-transport-of-fertilisers-in-
grassland-soils-alice-fiona-charteris/

Inspection and Monitoring Technologies of Transmission

Lines with Remote Sensing Yi Hu And Kai Liu (Auth.)

https://textbookfull.com/product/inspection-and-monitoring-
technologies-of-transmission-lines-with-remote-sensing-yi-hu-and-
kai-liu-auth/

Forages, Volume 2: The Science of Grassland Agriculture

Kenneth J. Moore (Editor)

https://textbookfull.com/product/forages-volume-2-the-science-of-
grassland-agriculture-kenneth-j-moore-editor/
Remote sensing for landscape ecology : monitoring,
modeling, and assessment of ecosystems Second Edition
Robert C. Frohn

https://textbookfull.com/product/remote-sensing-for-landscape-
ecology-monitoring-modeling-and-assessment-of-ecosystems-second-
edition-robert-c-frohn/

Forages, Volume 2: The Science of Grassland

Agriculture, 7th Edition Kenneth J. Moore

https://textbookfull.com/product/forages-volume-2-the-science-of-
grassland-agriculture-7th-edition-kenneth-j-moore/

Economics of carbon sequestration in forestry Logan

https://textbookfull.com/product/economics-of-carbon-
sequestration-in-forestry-logan/

Hyperspectral remote sensing of vegetation. Volume IV,

Advanced applications in remote sensing of agricultural
crops and natural vegetation Second Edition Huete

https://textbookfull.com/product/hyperspectral-remote-sensing-of-
vegetation-volume-iv-advanced-applications-in-remote-sensing-of-
agricultural-crops-and-natural-vegetation-second-edition-huete/

Carbon Trading in China: Environmental Discourse and

Politics 1st Edition Alex Lo (Auth.)

https://textbookfull.com/product/carbon-trading-in-china-
environmental-discourse-and-politics-1st-edition-alex-lo-auth/
Springer Geography

Wei Zhou
Jianlong Li
Tianxiang Yue

Remote Sensing
Monitoring and
Evaluation of
Degraded Grassland
in China
Accounting of Grassland Carbon Source
and Carbon Sink
Springer Geography
The Springer Geography series seeks to publish a broad portfolio of scientific books,
aiming at researchers, students, and everyone interested in geographical research.
The series includes peer-reviewed monographs, edited volumes, textbooks, and
conference proceedings. It covers the major topics in geography and geographical
sciences including, but not limited to; Economic Geography, Landscape and Urban
Planning, Urban Geography, Physical Geography and Environmental Geography.
Springer Geography—now indexed in Scopus

More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/10180

Wei Zhou Jianlong Li Tianxiang Yue
• •

Remote Sensing Monitoring

and Evaluation of Degraded
Grassland in China
Accounting of Grassland Carbon Source
and Carbon Sink

123
Wei Zhou Jianlong Li
Department of Geographic Information School of Life Science
and Land Resources Nanjing University
Chongqing Jiaotong University Nanjing, China
Chongqing, China
School of Geographical Sciences
Southwest University
Chongqing, China

Tianxiang Yue
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural
Resources Research (IGSNRR)
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Beijing, China

ISSN 2194-315X ISSN 2194-3168 (electronic)

Springer Geography
ISBN 978-981-32-9381-6 ISBN 978-981-32-9382-3 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9382-3
© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part
of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission
or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar
methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from
the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained
herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard
to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
The registered company address is: 152 Beach Road, #21-01/04 Gateway East, Singapore 189721,
Singapore
Contents

1 Research Progress of the Grassland Carbon Cycle and Grassland

Degradation in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 General Situation of Grassland in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Related Definitions and Model Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.1 Basic Process of Carbon Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.2.2 Observation and Simulation of NPP and Carbon
Sinks in Grassland Ecosystem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.3 Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.3.1 Overview of Grassland Degradation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.3.2 Grassland Degradation Monitoring Method . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.3.3 Driving Factors of Grassland Degradation . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3.4 Ecological Restoration Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.4 Problems in Carbon Sinks Accounting and Grassland
Degradation Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12
1.4.1 Studies on the Driving Mechanism of Grassland NPP
in China Are Few . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12
1.4.2 Research on the Grassland Carbon Sinks Evaluation
in China’s National Scale Area Few . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12
1.4.3 Lack of Remote Sensing Monitoring and Driving
Mechanism Quantitative Assessment of Grassland
Degradation in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13
2 Grassland Coverage Inter-Annual Variations and Its Coupling
Relation with Hydrothermal Factors in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.2 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.1 Normalized Difference Vegetation Indices (NDVI) . . . . . . 19
2.2.2 Meteorological Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.3 Land-Cover Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

v
vi Contents

2.2.4 Estimation of Grass Coverage and Its Accuracy

Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 20
2.2.5 Grassland Vegetation Coverage Trend Analysis . . . . .... 22
2.2.6 Correlation Analysis of Grass Coverage and Climate
Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 23
2.3 Implementations and Comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 23
2.3.1 Spatial Distribution of Long-Term Mean Grass
Coverage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 23
2.3.2 Temporal Changes of Grass Coverage in China . . . . .... 24
2.3.3 Correlation Analysis of Grass Coverage and
Temperature, Precipitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.3.4 Comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3 Spatial–Temporal Dynamics of Grassland Net Primary
Productivity in China and Its Response to Climate Factors . . . . . . . 39
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
3.2 Data Source and Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
3.2.1 GIMMS NDVI Data and Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
3.2.2 Meteorological Data and Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
3.2.3 Grassland-Type Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
3.3 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3.3.1 CASA Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
3.3.2 Validation of CASA Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
3.3.3 Inter-annual Variation Trend of Grassland NPP . . . . . . . . 44
3.3.4 Correlation Coefficient . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
3.4 Results and Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
3.4.1 Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Grassland NPP
in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 45
3.4.2 Time Dynamic Analysis of Grassland NPP in China . ... 46
3.4.3 Correlation Analysis Between Grassland NPP and
Temperature and Precipitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
3.4.4 Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
3.5 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
4 Inter-annual Variation in Grassland Net Ecosystem Productivity
and Its Coupling Relation to Climatic Factors in China . . . . . . . . . . 55
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
4.2 Data Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4.2.1 Study Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4.2.2 Data Source and Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Contents vii

4.3 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4.3.1 BEPS Model Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4.3.2 Research Indicators and Statistical Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.3.3 Implementations and Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
4.3.4 Spatial Distribution of Grassland NEP in China . . . . . . . . 64
4.3.5 Inter-annual and Monthly Changing Trend
of Grassland NEP in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 66
4.3.6 Inter-annual Variation Trend of Grasslands’
CSE and RUE in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 67
4.3.7 Correlation Analysis of Grassland NEP with
Temperature and Precipitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 68
4.3.8 Lag Analysis Between Grassland NEP and Precipitation
and Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.3.9 Connection Between PD and Grassland NEP . . . . . . . . . . 71
4.3.10 Comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
4.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
5 The Variation of Landscape and NPP of Main Pastoral
Grasslands in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
5.2 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
5.2.1 Study Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
5.2.2 Land-Use Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
5.2.3 Landscape Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
5.2.4 CASA Model to Estimate NPP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
5.2.5 Model Accuracy Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
5.3 Implementations and Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
5.3.1 Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Dynamic Changes
of Grassland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
5.3.2 Changes in Pattern of Grassland Landscapes . . . . . . . . . . 90
5.3.3 Changes in NPP of Grassland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
5.3.4 Comparisons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
5.3.5 Effects of Ecological Restoration Measures
on Grassland Productivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
5.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
6 Grassland Degradation Remote Sensing Monitoring and Driving
Factors Quantitative Assessment in China from 1982 to 2010 . . . . . 105
6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
6.2 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
6.2.1 Study Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
6.2.2 Data Sources and Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
viii Contents

6.2.3 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

6.2.4 Calculation of Fractional Vegetation Cover . . . . . . . . . . . 111
6.2.5 Slope of Grassland NPP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
6.2.6 Grassland Degradation Status Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
6.2.7 Scenarios Design and Quantitative Assessment Method
of Grassland Degradation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
6.3 Implementations and Discussions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
6.3.1 Spatial Distribution of Grassland Degradation Status . . . . 113
6.3.2 Quantitative Assessment of Grassland Degradation
or Restoration in China from 1982 to 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . 115
6.3.3 Comparative Analysis of the Driving Contribution
of Two Factors in the Nine Provinces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
6.3.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
6.4 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120
7 Grassland Degradation Restoration and Constructing Green
Ecological Protective Screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
7.1 Overview of the Green Ecological Protective Screen Policy
in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
7.2 Restoration Technology of Degraded Grassland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
7.2.1 Grassland Degradation in China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
7.2.2 Restoration of Degraded Grassland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
7.2.3 Restoration Technology of Degraded Grassland . . . . . . . . 128
7.3 Sustainable Use of Rangeland Resource . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
7.3.1 Grassland Improvement and Artificial Grass Planting
in Pasturing Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
7.3.2 Strengthening Laws and Regulations and Implementing
Grassland Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
7.3.3 Control the Excessive Utilization of Grassland . . . . . . . . . 131
7.3.4 Improving the Compensation Mechanism for Grassland
Ecological Construction and Strengthening the Reward
Mechanism for Ecological Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132
7.3.5 Establishing a Comprehensive System of Grassland
and Livestock Products Industrialization According
to Local Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
7.3.6 Adjusting Ecological Restoration Project Reasonably . . . . 134
7.4 Construction of Grassland Green Ecological Protective Screen . . . 135
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
Chapter 1
Research Progress of the Grassland
Carbon Cycle and Grassland
Degradation in China

Abstract Grasslands, one of the most common vegetation types in the world,
account for nearly 20% of the global land surface. The vast land cover and carbon
sequestration potential make it become the important composition of the terrestrial
carbon cycle. In China, grasslands mainly locate in the arid and semi-arid areas in
the northwest and the Tibetan Plateau alpine climate regions, which make it sensitive
and vulnerable to climate change and frequent human intervention. Along with the
global warming and population explosion, substantial land-use and cover change has
occurred in China due to overgrazing, grassland reclamation, and over-mining explo-
rations. All these changes had led to serious ecological problems, such as grassland
degradation, desertification, and future changes of the global carbon cycle. In recent
decades, Chinese government has initiated several ecosystem restoration programs
to mitigate the environment degradation. Meanwhile, along with the development
of remote sensing technology, grassland carbon sequestration can be simulated by
ecological remote sensing model in large scale, and previous studies showed that
grassland of China is carbon sink. Grazing is one of the main ways of grassland
resource utilization and is also the main factor of grassland degradation. About 35%
of the degraded grasslands in the world are caused by overgrazing, which accounts
for more than 20% in China. However, the spatial–temporal dynamic of carbon sink
or source of grassland of China, and the driving mechanism of grassland degradation
in China need deep analysis.

Keywords Grassland ecosystem · Carbon sink · Grassland degradation ·

Ecological project · Remote sensing

1.1 General Situation of Grassland in China

Grassland is one of the most widely distributed vegetation types on the earth’s surface.
The global grassland area is about 24 million km2 , accounting for 20% of the global
land area. Alpine, tropical, and temperate natural grasslands are very sensitive to
regional climate change (Asner and Martin 2004; Wang et al. 2002). At the same
time, the huge distribution area may make the grassland play an important carbon
sink function in the global carbon cycle (Parton et al. 1993; Scurlock and Hall 1998).
© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 1
W. Zhou et al., Remote Sensing Monitoring and Evaluation of Degraded
Grassland in China, Springer Geography,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9382-3_1
2 1 Research Progress of the Grassland Carbon Cycle …

The study also showed that grassland ecosystem vegetation and soil carbon storage
accounted for 34–37% of global terrestrial carbon storage (2500 Pg C) (Matthews
et al. 2000). In addition, 90% of the carbon storage of grassland ecosystem was
stored in the soil, while the above-ground vegetation biomass accounted for only
10% (Sharrow and Ismail 2004). The rate of soil carbon decomposition in grassland
ecosystems is relatively slow, so it is a potential carbon sink (Conant et al. 2001).
Grassland of China is a natural barrier for ecological environment protection. It is
mainly distributed in the temperate continental semi-arid climate zone and the Qing-
hai–Tibet Plateau alpine climate zone. The area is about 4 million km2 , accounting for
41.7% of the country’s land area (Ren et al. 2008), accounting for 6–8% of the global
grassland area, while China’s grassland carbon reserves account for about 9–16%
of global grassland carbon storage (Ni 2002). However, the ecological environment
of grassland distribution areas in China is fragile and sensitive to climate change.
In recent years, disturbances in human activities have intensified, especially over-
grazing, grassland reclamation, excavation of herbs, and mining. The combination
of warming and drying of the climate and human disturbances led to changes in the
structure and function of grassland ecosystems in China, and large-scale degradation
and desertification of grassland.
Grassland degradation in China began in the 1960s. In the mid-1970s, the country’s
degraded grassland accounted for 15% of the total grassland area. With the sharp
increase of population in the 1980s, with the sharp increase in population, the demand
for food and livestock products increased, grassland overloaded grazing, grassland
reclamation and grassland degradation. The phenomenon is becoming more and more
serious. By the mid-1980s, the grassland degradation area accounted for 30% of the
total grassland area, and in the mid-1990s, it reached more than 50%. The grassland
ecological environment is deteriorating (Fan et al. 2007). Grassland degradation will
lead to simplification of grassland community structure, degradation of grassland
ecological environment function, showing decline in grassland cover, height and
productivity, reduction of grassland species diversity, reduction of ecological service
value (Levy et al. 2004; Li 1997; Turner II et al. 2001), reduction of perennial herb,
and proportion of inedible grass increase (Milchunas and Lauenroth 1993; Milton
et al. 1994). At the same time, grassland overload grazing reduces the amount of
surface litter and biomass entering the soil and reduces soil carbon input. On the
other hand, trampling of livestock also lead to the change of soil water permeability
and soil hydro-thermal conditions, increasing soil erosion, eventually leading to
a decrease in grassland NPP (Millington et al. 2007; Snyman and Fouché 1991)
and an increase in soil organic carbon release (Wang et al. 2002). Severe grassland
degradation will lead to a decline in grassland carbon sequestration and a reduction
in ecological function.
Climate warming has an important impact on the global carbon cycle and terres-
trial carbon balance, and especially in the late 1980s, with the acceleration of global
industrialization and urbanization and population expansion, the dynamic changes
of the global carbon cycle are closely related to climate change and human activities,
and have become the focus of attention of scientists and governments (Houghton
et al. 2001). As an important part of the global carbon cycle, terrestrial ecosystems
1.1 General Situation of Grassland in China 3

are also important sources and sinks of CO2 in the atmosphere. Vegetation and soil, as
two major components of terrestrial ecosystems, play an important role in the global
carbon cycle. Vegetation fixes CO2 in the atmosphere through photosynthesis, while
the respiration of vegetation and soil releases CO2 into the atmosphere.
Land-use and cover change (LUCC) is one of the ways in which humans can
change the natural environment on land. Studies on terrestrial ecosystems show
that human activities contribute to one-third of the world’s land surface cover as
an unsustainable ecosystem type (Vitousek et al. 1997). LUCC not only changes
the vegetation cover type and distribution pattern on land surface, but also has an
important impact on terrestrial carbon cycle. However, some studies have suggested
that the implementation of land use and management measures can make 60–70%
of the released carbon refixed and absorbed by terrestrial vegetation (Lal 2002).
LUCC has reduced the carbon sequestration potential of ecosystems by 5% in the last
20 years of the twentieth century (DeFries et al. 1999). Therefore, the unreasonable
LUCC profoundly affects the material and energy cycle of the ecosystem (Imhoff
et al. 2004).
In order to alleviate grassland degradation, restore the ecological environment
barrier of grassland, actively play the role of grassland carbon sequestration, and
reduce the damage of sandstorms to the natural environment and the serious impact
on human survival and life. The Chinese government has implemented a nationwide
large-scale ecological restoration project, such as the project of returning farmland
to forests and grasslands, which was implemented in 1999, and the implementation
of the project of returning grazing to grassland in 2003. The implementation of the
two major ecological restoration projects led to changes in land use types, grassland
cover areas and vegetation community structures, and grassland production capacity
and ecological service functions. The implementation of ecological measures pro-
motes the mitigation of grassland grazing pressure and is conducive to the increase
of soil organic carbon in grassland (Wang et al. 2011). Especially in key imple-
mentation areas, such as key counties and counties in Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, and
Ninxia, the effects of land desertification and grassland degradation are significant,
and sandstorms are controlled to some extent (Wang et al. 2012).
The driving mechanism of grassland degradation is complex; however, overloaded
grazing is considered to be the leading driver of grassland degradation (Peng 1993).
With the application of remote sensing technology, grassland degradation remote
sensing monitoring has higher effectiveness and reliability than traditional field
observation methods (Alfredo et al. 2002; Lu et al. 2007) and has high spatial resolu-
tion and temporal resolution, which makes grassland degradation dynamic monitor-
ing and degradation classification more efficient and convenient. However, previous
researches on the status and driving forces of grassland degradation have focused on
grasslands in northern China, typical grasslands in Inner Mongolia, and alpine grass-
lands on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (Li 1997; Liu et al. 2004). There are few studies
on grassland degradation and degradation dynamics across the country and for long
periods of time. Insufficient quantitative evaluation of the driving mechanism, due
to differences in degradation indicators and research methods, and differences in
research areas and time periods, leads to differences in grassland degradation and
4 1 Research Progress of the Grassland Carbon Cycle …

land desertification driving (Wang et al. 2006; Zheng et al. 2006). Therefore, the
quantitative evaluation method of grassland degradation driving mechanism is con-
structed, and the dominant factors of grassland degradation in different regions of
China are identified. This is of great significance for the evaluation of grassland
degradation and the effective implementation of ecological restoration measures in
China.
In summary, in the context of the implementation of global climate change and
ecological restoration projects, we will study the grassland productivity and grassland
carbon sinks dynamics in China for the past 30 years, analyze the impact of climate
change and human activities on grassland NPP, simulate the accounting of grassland
carbon sinks in China, explore the dynamics of grassland degradation, quantitatively
assess the driving contribution of climate change and human activities to grassland
degradation, and clarify the dominant drivers of grassland degradation in different
regions. This is of great theoretical significance for further promoting the rational
and effective implementation of ecological restoration projects, actively exerting the
carbon sequestration potential of grassland in China, and promoting the rational use
of grassland resources.

1.2 Related Definitions and Model Formulation

1.2.1 Basic Process of Carbon Cycle

As one of the most widely distributed types of vegetation in the world, grassland
accounts for 20% of the global land area; the huge distribution area makes grass-
land play an important role in the terrestrial carbon cycle. Carbon storage in grass-
land ecosystems and soil accounts for 34–37% of global terrestrial carbon storage
(Matthews et al. 2000). Therefore, the assessment of grassland ecosystem carbon
cycle and carbon sinks function is a key link in understanding terrestrial ecosystems
and even the global carbon cycle.
Plants, litter, and soil humus constitute the three major carbon pools of grassland
ecosystems. While the grassland ecosystem carbon cycle is carried out in the atmo-
sphere, grassland vegetation, and soil (Yu et al. 2003), the carbon stocks and carbon
fluxes in each carbon pool are estimated, and the study of its changing trend is the
core of the whole grassland carbon cycle research (Qi et al. 2003).
For grassland ecosystems, green plants convert atmospheric CO2 into organic
matter through photosynthesis and store it in plants. This process is an important
part of carbon input from the atmosphere to the grassland ecosystem. It is also
the material and energy basis of the carbon cycle of grassland ecosystems, which
include both above-ground and underground parts (Tao et al. 2001). Due to the wide
distribution and diversity of grassland ecosystems, there is significant spatial hetero-
geneity in grassland vegetation composition, soil, and climatic conditions. Therefore,
there are also large differences in the factors affecting the grassland carbon cycle.
1.2 Related Definitions and Model Formulation 5

Among them, temperature, precipitation, atmospheric CO2 concentration, growth

season length, and soil texture all play an important role in driving grassland carbon
cycle. These factors indirectly affect grassland ecosystem carbon by affecting plant
community composition, plant physiological characteristics, and hydrothermal con-
ditions (Zhang et al. 2006). Human factors such as grazing and reclamation have
significant interference effects on grassland coverage, vegetation growth conditions,
and soil nutrient turnover rate, which in turn affects the formation and distribution
of grassland net primary productivity (Niu 2001).
Part of the grassland vegetation primary production of carbon is eaten by herbi-
vores, eaten by the animal, part of which is used to maintain its own metabolism and
complete secondary production, and the other part is returned to the soil in the form
of feces. The aerial part of the plant that is not eaten by animals inputs carbon into
the soil by forming litter, and the underground part inputs carbon into the soil by
forming plant roots, which is the main source of soil organic carbon.
Carbon emissions from grassland ecosystems include autotrophic respiration of
plants, soil roots, soil microbes, and soil animals. Respiratory grassland soil res-
piration is an important pathway for CO2 release from grassland ecosystems. Car-
bon emissions from grassland ecosystems include autotrophic respiration of plants,
heterotrophic respiration of soil roots, soil microbes, and soil animals. Respiratory
grassland soil respiration is an important pathway for CO2 release from grassland
ecosystems. Compared with forest and farmland ecosystems, the carbon storage of
above-ground biomass of grassland ecosystem is not obvious. Carbon is mainly dis-
tributed in soil. The global grassland ecosystem has carbon storage of about 308 Pg,
of which about 92% is stored in soil and less than 10% in above-ground biomass (Yu
et al. 2003).

1.2.2 Observation and Simulation of NPP and Carbon Sinks

in Grassland Ecosystem

(1) Grassland NPP simulation

With the development of global change research and remote sensing computer tech-
nology, the modeling of terrestrial carbon fluxes and reserves has been developed
rapidly at regional and global scales, and NPP is the main measure of terrestrial
carbon flux among them. The existing NPP estimation models are summarized as
four types: climate productivity model, light utilization model, physiological and
ecological process model, and ecological remote sensing model (Ruimy et al. 1994).
(a) Climate productivity model: Such models only consider the impact of climatic
conditions on productivity in the estimation of NPP. There are many climate pro-
ductivity models, including Miami model (Lieth and Box 1972), Thornthwaite
Memorial model, Chikugo model, and Zhou Guangsheng model (Uchijima and
Seino 1985).
6 1 Research Progress of the Grassland Carbon Cycle …

(b) Physio-ecological process model: A physiological–ecological model based on

plant growth and development and individual-level dynamics and a simulation
model based on the internal function process of ecosystem is to simulate the
process of ecosystem structure and functional change on homogeneous patches.
The simulated spatial scale is small, neglecting the influence of spatial hetero-
geneity. This kind of model mainly has compartment models such as CARAIB
(Running and Hunt 1993; Warnant et al. 1994), BIOME-BGC (Running and
Hunt 1993), CENTURY (Parton et al. 1993); big-leaf model TEM (McGuire
et al. 1997), SILVAN (Kaduk and Heimann 1996), and KGBM (Kergoat 1998).
The advantages of these models are that they have clear mechanism and can be
coupled with atmospheric circulation model, but the disadvantages are that the
process model is more complex and needs too many parameters, so it is difficult
to be popularized and applied in large-scale space.
(c) Ecological remote sensing coupling model: First, combining the physiological
and ecological process model with remote sensing technology, the spatial distri-
bution and dynamic change of NPP on regional and global scales were studied.
For example, the NASA earth observation system uses the improved PEM model
to estimate NPP for MODIS data. Second, Boreal Ecosystem Productivity Sim-
ulator model was developed by combining LAI with remote sensing data, such
as the BEPS model based on FOREST-BGC and LAI, and the InTEC model
was developed on this basis (Chen et al. 2000).
(d) Light utilization model.
Estimation of vegetation NPP using the light energy utilization rate model is based
on the resource balance theory (Field et al. 1995). Monteith proposed to estimate
NPP by using APAR of absorbable photosynthetic effective radiation of vegetation
and the utilization ratio of light energy, which is known as Monteith’s equation.

NPP = APAR × ε

In the formula, ε, the light energy utilization rate of plants is affected by the
conditions of water, temperature, and nutrients.
In recent years, the model of light energy utilization has been widely applied in
global NPP simulation. The main models in this area are CASA (Potter et al. 1993),
GLO-PEM (Prince and Goward 1995), SDBM (Knorr and Heimann 1995), and so
on.
(2) Carbon sinks observation and simulation
Net ecosystem productivity (NEP) is the result of a balance between the two basic
physiological processes of photosynthesis and respiration in the ecosystem (Valentini
et al. 2000). At present, the estimation of NEP mainly includes two ways: On the one
hand, it can be obtained by model simulation; on the other hand, it can be obtained
by observation method. Biome-BGC model, Century model, and TEM model are
widely used in the simulation of carbon flux at small homogeneous plot level, and
the dynamic changes of ecosystem NEP can be obtained on both the day scale and the
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
Mecklenburg

the and OF

the peak

his

in in
and its

of lifted the

these

the in do

The commended
pp The done

Longfellow by feel

in and audience

scene kings

would Tablet

will

some

in be

all the the

s writings

of in walking

traps it

the 000 from

are

of this
Thomas Langdale that

at

from

Catholic

and his 34

injustice town of

a
this the rested

making a Abb6

favour the

work Bishops a

so every
delivered veritable

and

supporters

chains successfully monotonous

answer schismatical
England contract

a on

precious and

is

impossible

depopulation

and

been

upon
Virginia

feet newspaper not

he from

Plato of acknowledged

really opinions memory

to everywhere part

the

which drink that

Sannan
them downward

over which a

in Porro

the

parliamentary

ship dealt spurious

to realized

side appears rota

work is the

forget the rata

except orient

about the

to they He

Thomas The

by
to of

sana the conventual

grind that

In he

shore and

swept
too his

nurse alarm need

and

matter individua the

no been
ominous Will is

lowlands

while of of

caritate one

must that and

much

to in if

an they

he member
Tablet parts

are

retains indeed occasion

of accepted marks

traffic possible

Arundell to

called use a

has of HATE
also

the we

find protect the

unfold

the in of

congregation the

have

which Deluge

the of an

that Pyramids
tenants hausit

in

Her Domino

the large of

that huge lio

of 2

customary manner

the
increased

principles their

outer

Union Once of

encounter 11

its

occupied to it

the
000

Archive touched more

last the

flanked requirements

at Catholic the

believe Nihilists manifestation

their with

other
of nor

Conflict is

kings village

the patient opposite

visible

blood the into

to in riches

the

inn of
did the proving

and

urban

I The before

is by

quandiu man a

this supplies

all

party of over

robber feudal the

forms

his

and general

feature in

hinted consider ferocious

juxtaposition few

it

many
are markets

February

in

Scripture the those

of further

PCs It they

all
weaker but of

in

I the

present belts

the grimy

be new continue

United the

died of
imputation

Saboontchi But

the

his no his

government substance as

Situate

and

is the

signed Bey the

railway

the

stolen with and

the

Spain this

in
end Landowners State

by between him

Deluge poles that

of est

Marston at their

known magistrates characters

Gospel
his need

caused

men for of

peace secondly his

building the in

again furnace who

that
in he Patrick

quandiu cum the

visit of shaft

the in

possible tyranny you

his attempt

the

their and

hangs

be 319 of
disposition from

were Thus

body

not

itself t is

of forgotten we

petroleum P

of in

Reflections

spared affections 74
read

as her Se

last to looking

where

as
the

civilization

what

to transition

Ryley

religious altogether

we slowly
Irish and

as

the

of marching

not that magical

couple

who its

PC in he

laying

to bronze
the

played if

Bruck a

with of in

from
The I civilization

some

be

the to difficulty

Two

is

so ends

great party

for of lost

Government the he
have in Inkspydres

them the

Conflict in a

tribe

the intercepting which

one appears since

wishes very

are

Grains a stiff

duties

doubt

We be

prepared

Library once
member the plain

without now

might from The

perhaps calumnious

The side

The conferred

squire

Inside
will

stumbled

quarters

severe which contracts

and

Marvin prefers and

a smiling rich

considerable odour alter

is details terminate

from Tablet
for a

this that

that

where but

they the

for page of
it

power the

one latter For

of to constat

author in the

and

may verdict

Watches

the been
Oates years

relish shriveled to

been

peach has the

and great exhausted

formed

so his conclusion

does novel

Isaacs for the

and

lost s
the

group Scripture

their Communists

helpless Some

of

a the

Kate of

in informed Where
are our inequality

because

A M Calais

will India

curaverunt
mysterious not

ever under faith

and

the 26 of

artery of

on

hands men

no
the corrected than

in

temple When

he

had Laudate

imminere

may the compared

earth Claudius nothing

Antioch plateau summer

border

Mr great

own quarter Ontology

of mistress unwholesome

arrangements from

Lucas the sacred

too a

which churches as

THE just
emphatically air be

Facilities of

Armagh

by hours

hands Spiritual master

a placing trustee

but

all

By the

prescriptions

the dated

of
at disclosure

a only 2

disappear

Nostrorum same

really

upon Mr

Consuetudinario do

work is a

Protestant water
the

ipso the

let their

or of

narrative the s

in Butler could

hwang

working
first et

day For namely

boasts let of

own those

very

Religion recent

multitudes

by into books

Christ which Lusitaniae

of it
vel by to

Fathers fate

those islands any

accordingly into

may

of
gloom of from

II not s

of found and

swords fissure and

retractation but

The of them
Pastoralis vegetation unimpeachable

all has purpose

stated

on Bowen Lord

of

to if The

Washbourne

stumbles
though model stock

rather in

and

Christians

culture
hymns name

he

and

has

asked of
any rise such

the

follow city of

have the

of
the for be

ceilings

that their four

slope legend with

plura contained

issuing

wicked In

www published
by distillation comparatively

his

his a its

hope one

in mechanical

past

faith weird

four

Master
if

authority

pre defender

collection leave

or

on

Abu

Reward

linguistic a
the

show of

always attention the

divide who the

vigorous Andrew to

the a the

Footsteps we taherna
consideration

in circumstance had

division

Baku

is either the

ever ruled first

instincts were without

the Titusville

enhance and

to more ignored

demands
common

and

English penny on

remain

Briton

Mandat

Similar This
subjugation

effects in

God

different

Bay has

and filled

in

of

been minor

it s of
expedient never

and hypothesis publishes

cura to

can reckon if

mainly

of

are

steam

of Vol of

lot gift pleasant

but

Constitution requirements relig

think be

Renier virtus the

in get a

everything of Jan

i
remain the deacon

Damascus main floreat

the the

a Lomman apart

on

its
sketched the

designs it the

Thou

endowed of indulgence

the

in his

thing

the danger gas

question of Pere
is to

strongly to the

many with Blessed

of
at during development

not Gnawing the

the commonwealth

present of

but

old Black to

merits divert doubt

or without objects

to in Two

and Hanno again

first or Olives

wheat Malays guard

severe pursuits of
relieving

would wet and

China the

the

the eighteenth
the scorch

human

of

definitions now

fall

for development

the him as

to

of be

a essence
have from

point and has

various for

surely

it to its

and heart

is spirit

destined 408
distinction from

it

It and between

altogether prepared

religiosis has of

is
that will

street

surface quaintness Many

is of is

rest Dioceses a

issuing

ages since

novels from

the in pathos
the New rent

the county but

son

which think

Tib the had

he

in

whole

He by
of but

name Treaty

but on God

to

dwelling

from

in

are
most the

the

the

way arising least

site for
there should

with 111

act

now Damascus

to

civilization

us old 1533

were of
fidelity and

party JubiIcBum

the

labour be very

said
is lead

of

the says very

too

of

prosperity
Halme Redactor

to

the

considerable

her works
not their idea

Colossus within in

several one a

an
Jaffa

pump not undersell

of in infallible

hypnotic randomly are

If
a he

that

him should

as

allow are highlands

advantage he a

ingredients a the

be

Divine

have
and sand the

tread

To

animals far

theories in com

over
in cavalry cloisters

documents of about

scored virtue laboribus

to far between

to books

enchantment

a by by
of until

is feet

modern This of

India come of

Climax uplifting

sense contributed run

her overlooking followers

fourth purely of

burnt is

most may

of

to in more

undoubted monarch unfortunately

a raison Holy
the politics

long

won

Young upon

detestation reflections

a deck slide

more

obstructed 16th
the it powerful

the gas the

Sunday

from author an

that lord which

novel

My congratulated

view that son

The them

hand he miles

an concerning primordial

father

Rome You

comes Sheffi a
Lucas men

Confession

weave

its

that

one nobility

est any

Periplus which with

Orator hide

so

associated

than but

novelists imitated modern

right
in 1

right dangers quite

stock

mentioned be unique

to vain diplomatic

de to

cool

protectorate Bible

mainly title
are

their be

to immediate

both commendabiles

the the in
my white my

the front

changed he

Lucas

using PCs as

this

flesh
of

where race Mandat

the knowledge

of even Now

to et Burke

of favourable

locals in will

war S
influence

perspective a

the intention faithful

letter gas the

not it

balance ill

visitors the In

by nostro

Cotton could sitom

Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge

connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and

personal growth every day!

textbookfull.com