100% found this document useful (1 vote)
57 views106 pages

Quantum Mechanics in Matrix Form 1st Edition Günter Ludyk Digital Version 2025

Educational file: Quantum Mechanics in Matrix Form 1st Edition Günter LudykInstantly accessible. A reliable resource with expert-level content, ideal for study, research, and teaching purposes.

Uploaded by

plcueutcwu008
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
57 views106 pages

Quantum Mechanics in Matrix Form 1st Edition Günter Ludyk Digital Version 2025

Educational file: Quantum Mechanics in Matrix Form 1st Edition Günter LudykInstantly accessible. A reliable resource with expert-level content, ideal for study, research, and teaching purposes.

Uploaded by

plcueutcwu008
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 106

Quantum Mechanics in Matrix Form 1st Edition Günter

Ludyk 2025 easy download

https://textbookfull.com/product/quantum-mechanics-in-matrix-
form-1st-edition-gunter-ludyk/

★★★★★
4.8 out of 5.0 (67 reviews )

Immediate PDF Access

textbookfull.com
Quantum Mechanics in Matrix Form 1st Edition Günter Ludyk

TEXTBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library


More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...

A Course in Quantum Mechanics 1st Edition Nandita Rudra


(Author)

https://textbookfull.com/product/a-course-in-quantum-
mechanics-1st-edition-nandita-rudra-author/

Multi-scale Extracellular Matrix Mechanics and


Mechanobiology Yanhang Zhang

https://textbookfull.com/product/multi-scale-extracellular-
matrix-mechanics-and-mechanobiology-yanhang-zhang/

Some Unusual Topics in Quantum Mechanics Pankaj Sharan

https://textbookfull.com/product/some-unusual-topics-in-quantum-
mechanics-pankaj-sharan/

Computational Quantum Mechanics Joshua Izaac

https://textbookfull.com/product/computational-quantum-mechanics-
joshua-izaac/
Problems in Quantum Mechanics with Solutions 2nd
Edition Emilio D'Emilio

https://textbookfull.com/product/problems-in-quantum-mechanics-
with-solutions-2nd-edition-emilio-demilio/

Quantum Mechanics for Beginners - with applications to


quantum communication and quantum computing 1st Edition
M. Suhail Zubairy

https://textbookfull.com/product/quantum-mechanics-for-beginners-
with-applications-to-quantum-communication-and-quantum-
computing-1st-edition-m-suhail-zubairy/

Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics Neumann

https://textbookfull.com/product/mathematical-foundations-of-
quantum-mechanics-neumann/

Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics Ajit Kumar

https://textbookfull.com/product/fundamentals-of-quantum-
mechanics-ajit-kumar/

Modern Quantum Mechanics J. J. Sakurai

https://textbookfull.com/product/modern-quantum-mechanics-j-j-
sakurai/
Günter Ludyk

Quantum
Mechanics in
Matrix Form
Quantum Mechanics in Matrix Form
Günter Ludyk

Quantum Mechanics
in Matrix Form

123
Günter Ludyk
Physics and Electrical Engineering
University of Bremen
Bremen
Germany

ISBN 978-3-319-26364-9 ISBN 978-3-319-26366-3 (eBook)


https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26366-3
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017954872

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018


This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part
of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations,
recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission
or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar
methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from
the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this
book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the
authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or
for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Printed on acid-free paper

This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature


The registered company is Springer International Publishing AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
In memory of my parents

Martha and Paul Ludyk


Preface and Introduction

Though this be madness, yet there is method in’t.

Hamlet, William Shakespeare

Matrix mechanics was introduced in 1925 by the German physicist Werner


Heisenberg1 [13]. However, the American Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg2 writes
about this publication [26]:
If the reader is mystified at what Heisenberg was doing, he or she is not alone. I have tried
several times to read the paper that Heisenberg wrote on returning from Helgoland, and,
although I think I understand quantum mechanics, I have never understood Heisenberg’s
motivations for the mathematical steps in his paper.

For years, Heisenberg and his colleagues had been struggling with a problem that
had been raised in 1913 by Niels Bohr3 in his atomic theory: why do electrons in
atoms occupy only certain permitted orbits with certain well-defined energies?
Heisenberg took a completely new approach to this question. Because the trajectory
of an electron in an atom cannot be directly observed, he decided to deal only with
measurable quantities (namely the allowed energies for the quantum states of all
electrons in the atom, as well as the frequencies with which an atom spontaneously
jumps from one of these quantum states to a different state while emitting a light
particle, i.e., a photon). Heisenberg introduced a sort of “table” of these frequencies.
He performed mathematical operations on it, which led to new tables for the various
physical quantities such as position, velocity, or the square of the velocity of an
electron.
To be more precise, the table entries were the so-called transition amplitudes,
that is, quantities whose squares specify a transition probability. When returning

1
Werner Heisenberg, 1901–1976, German physicist, Nobel Prize 1932.
2
Steven Weinberg, * 1933, American physicist, Nobel Prize 1979.
3
Niels Bohr, 1885–1962, Danish physicist, Nobel Prize 1922.

vii
viii Preface and Introduction

from Helgoland (where he first had this crucial idea) to Göttingen, Heisenberg
found out that the operations he applied to these tables were well known to
mathematicians. The tables were called matrices, and the operations that he used to
get from the table representing the electron velocity to the table representing the
square was named matrix multiplication. Starting from the known dependence
between the energy of a particle and its velocity and position in a simple system,
Heisenberg could calculate a table of the system’s energies in its different quantum
states, similar to Newton’s4 calculation of the energy of a planet based on its
position and velocity.
At the time, Heisenberg was constantly in touch with some influential theoretical
physicists, including the German researchers Max Born5 and Pascual Jordan6 and
the English physicist Paul Dirac.7 Until the end of the year 1925, they transformed
Heisenberg’s ideas into a comprehensive and systematic version of quantum
mechanics, which today we refer to as matrix mechanics. With the help of the new
matrix mechanics, the German physicist Wolfgang Pauli8 managed in the following
January to solve the paradigmatic problem in atomic physics, namely the calcula-
tion of the energy levels of the hydrogen atom. His calculations proved the earlier
ad hoc results of Bohr.
H.S. Green, an employee of Max Born, writes in [12]:
Most books on quantum theory emphasize the wave mechanical approach (of Schrödinger9),
probably because it is supposed to be easier to understand for those who already have a solid
knowledge on differential equations.

In this book, however, we restrict ourselves to the algebraic method using matrices
and only briefly describe Schrödinger’s wave mechanics in order to show the
equivalence with Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics. By implementing numerical
algorithms in standard software such as MAPLE or MATHEMATICA, matrices
and matrix equations are easy to handle these days [23].
I would like to thank Dr. Claus Ascheron from Springer for his kind assistance
during the compilation of this manuscript. Last but not least, I would like to express
my gratitude towards my wife Renate, without whom this book would have never
been published.

Bremen, Germany Günter Ludyk

4
Isaac Newton, 1642–1727.
5
Max Born, 1882–1970, German physicist, Nobel Prize 1954.
6
Pascual Jordan, 1902–1980, German physicist.
7
Paul Dirac, 1902–1984, English physicist, Nobel Prize 1933.
8
Wolfgang Pauli, 1900–1958, German physicist, Nobel Prize 1945.
9
Erwin Schrödinger, 1887–1961, Austrian physicist, Nobel Prize 1933.
Notations

Important definitions, facts, and theorems are shown in boxes. Important in-
termediate results are double underlined.

Scalars are written in normal font:

a; b; c; a; b; °; . . .

Vectors are written as lowercase letters in bold font:


x, p, v, …
Vectors in four-dimensional spacetime (R4 ) are written as bold lowercase letters
with an arrow:

~
x;~
v;~
u; . . .

Matrices are written as uppercase letters in bold font:

X; P; R; I; . . .

Matrix vectors are written as uppercase letters in bold Fraktur font:

<; X; B; . . .

Matrix vectors are block matrices:


0 1
X1
def @
<¼ X 2 A:
X3

The identity matrix In of size n is an n-by-n matrix in which all the elements on the
main diagonal are equal to 1 and all other elements are equal to 0:

ix
x Notations

0 1
1 0 0 0
B0 1 0 0C
I4 ¼ B
@0
C
0 1 0A
0 0 0 1

If the components are real numbers (R), the transpose of a vector x or a matrix A is
written as xT and AT, respectively. If the components are complex numbers (C), the
transpose is written as xy and Ay , respectively. In this case, the components of the
transpose row vector are the complex conjugate. Note that this is necessary in order
for the scalar product xy x to be a real number. The same reasoning applies to the
transpose matrix elements.
Contents

1 Quantum Theory Prior to 1925 . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1


1.1 Bohr–Sommerfeld Quantization Rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Sommerfeld’s Derivation . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Bohr’s Postulates . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.4 Atom Sizes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2 Heisenberg’s Year 1925 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.1 Spectral Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2 Introduction of Matrices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.3 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3 Expansion of the Matrix Method . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.1 Commutation Relation . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.2 Systems with Several Degrees of Freedom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.3 Transformations . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.4 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
4 Observables and Uncertainty Relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.1 State Vector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
4.2 The Stern-Gerlach Experiment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
4.3 States and Postulates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
4.4 Projection Matrices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
4.5 Probabilistic Interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4.6 Density Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.6.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
4.6.2 Mixed States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.6.3 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.7 Time Evolution of the Expectation Value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.8 Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
4.9 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

xi
xii Contents

5 The Harmonic Oscillator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47


5.1 Physics of the Harmonic Oscillator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
5.2 Expectation Values and Variances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
5.3 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
6 Angular Momentum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
6.1 The Matrix Vector of the Angular Momentum . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
6.2 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors of L2 and L3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
6.2.1 Commutativity of L2 and L3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
6.2.2 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
6.2.3 Maximum and Minimum Eigenvalues . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
6.2.4 Orientation of the Angular Momentum Vectors . . . . . . 68
6.2.5 The Matrices L2 and L3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
6.2.6 The Matrices L þ , L , L1 and L2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
6.3 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
7 Wolfgang Pauli and the Hydrogen Atom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
7.1 Basic Matrices and Matrix Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
7.2 Introduction of the Matrix Vector A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
7.3 The Hydrogen Spectrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
7.4 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
8 Spin . ..................................... . . . . . . . . . . . 85
8.1 Magnetic Fields and Light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
8.2 Derivation of the Zeeman Effect (Without Spin) . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
8.3 Symmetry Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
8.4 Symmetry and the Spin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
8.5 Spin-12 Systems and Spinors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
8.6 Adding Angular Momenta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
8.6.1 Clebsch–Gordan Coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
8.6.2 Clebsch–Gordan Coefficients on the Internet . . . . . . . . 98
8.7 Spin-Orbit Coupling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
8.8 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
9 Atoms in Electromagnetic Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
9.1 Normal Zeeman Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
9.2 Anomalous Zeeman Effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
9.2.1 Weak Field Limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
9.2.2 Strong Magnetic Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
9.3 Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
10 Many Particle Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
10.1 Composed Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
10.1.1 Systems with Two Distinguishable Particles . . . . . . . . . 111
10.1.2 Systems with N Distinguishable Subsystems . . . . . . . . 113
Contents xiii

10.1.3 Entangled Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114


10.2 Indistinguishable Subsystems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
10.2.1 Interchanging Two Particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119
10.2.2 Interchanging Three Identical Particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
10.2.3 Interchanging N Identical Particles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
10.3 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
11 Equivalence of Matrix and Wave Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
11.1 The De Broglie Wavelength . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
11.2 Operators in the Schrödinger Formalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
11.3 Schrödinger’s Wave Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
11.4 Equivalence of Heisenberg and Schrödinger Pictures . . . . . . . . 134
11.5 Example: The Harmonic Oscillator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
11.6 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
12 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
12.1 Special Relativity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
12.1.1 Four-Dimensional Spacetime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
12.1.2 Lorentz Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
12.1.3 Velocity and Its Lorentz Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . 143
12.1.4 Momentum and Its Lorentz Transformation . . . . . . . . . 144
12.1.5 Equation of Motion and Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144
12.1.6 Energy and Rest Mass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
12.2 The Dirac Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
12.2.1 The Wave Equation for a Free Particle . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
12.2.2 Invariant Form of the Dirac Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150
12.2.3 Solution of the Dirac Equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151
12.2.4 Dirac’s Interpretation of the Negative Energy . . . . . . . . 153
12.3 Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
Appendix A: Solutions to Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Appendix B: The Kronecker Product . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183
Appendix C: Fourier Decomposition of Periodic Functions . . . . . . . . . . . 185
Appendix D: Laplace–Runge–Lenz Vector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
Appendix E: Permutation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191
Appendix F: Determinants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193
Appendix G: Dirac’s Bra-Ket Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195
Appendix H: Proofs of Pauli’s Formulas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
Appendix I: Physical Quantities and Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
Chapter 1
Quantum Theory Prior to 1925

Abstract A description is given of the “Older Quantum Mechanics” as introduced


by Nils Bohr and Arnold Sommerfeld in the years before 1925. Bohr’s postulates
are formulated and the atom size is derived from them.

1.1 Bohr–Sommerfeld Quantization Rule

Before the behavior of atoms could be described with the help of quantum mechan-
ics, Bohr and Sommerfeld1 explained the spectra of simple atoms based on Bohr’s
atom model (“Older Quantum Mechanics”). In this model, spectral lines appear as
energy differences between two “discrete” electron orbits. The Bohr–Sommerfeld
quantization rule requires that not only the equation of motion holds for the orbit of
the electron around the nucleus, but that for each additional circulation

p dx = nh (n = 1, 2, . . . ) (1.1)

applies, where p is the momentum, and the position x runs through one complete
circle. As does the angular momentum, this integral has the dimension location times
moment and is an action. The constant

h = 2π ·  = 2π · 1.054572 · 10−34 J s = 6.6260755 · 10−34 J s

is the Planck quantum of action or Planck’s constant.2 In other words, the action of
each stationary electron orbit in the atom is quantized. The action can only occur as
an integer multiple of Planck’s constant. A detailed derivation of this principle by
Sommerfeld [22] is presented in the following section.

1 Arnold Sommerfeld, 1868–1951, German physicist.


2 Max Planck, 1858–1947, German physicist, Nobel Prize 1919.
© Springer International Publishing AG 2018 1
G. Ludyk, Quantum Mechanics in Matrix Form,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26366-3_1
2 1 Quantum Theory Prior to 1925

1.2 Sommerfeld’s Derivation

Let us consider an arbitrarily moving point mass with momentum

p = mv. (1.2)

With v = q̇ we get
p = m q̇. (1.3)

It is important to note that the dynamic triple of the momentum coordinates p is


considered in addition to the geometric triple of the position coordinates q. Newton
supplies
∂ E pot
ṗ = f = − , (1.4)
∂q

where it was assumed that the force f can be derived from a potential energy E pot
(which is a function of the position coordinates q). Using (1.3), the kinetic energy is
obtained as
m  1 
E kin = q̇ q̇ = p p.
2 2m
The total energy as a function of the qk and pk is also called the Hamilton function
or Hamiltonian H . We hence have
∂H ∂ E pot ∂H ∂ E kin p
H (q, p) = E kin + E pot , = , = = .
∂q ∂q ∂p ∂p m

As a result, the basic (1.3) and (1.25) can be written as

dq ∂H dp ∂H
= , =− . (1.5)
dt ∂p dt ∂q

Assuming that the kinetic energy is expressed as a function of q and q̇, the equation

∂ E kin
p= (1.6)
∂ q̇

is identical to (1.3).
The values of the coordinates q and p determine the state of the system. To
understand how the state of motion of the system depends on the location q and
the speed/momentum p, let us imagine a single mass point with three degrees of
freedom. Its three location coordinates and its three momentum coordinates can be
plotted as Cartesian coordinates in a state space of six dimensions, such that each
point of this state space represents a potential state of our mass point. Accordingly,
for a system with d degrees of freedom one gets a state space with 2d dimensions.
1.2 Sommerfeld’s Derivation 3

In a first step, we can restrict ourselves to systems with only one degree of freedom.
In this case, the general state space is a simple (two-dimensional) state plane. In this
state plane, we can introduce q and p as orthogonal coordinates. Afterwards, we
can construct state trajectories in this state plane, that is, the sequence of points
corresponding to the successive states of motion of the system. Taking each point
as the initial condition, we could draw such state trajectories and cover the entire
state plane with them, whereby the trajectories are arbitrarily close to each other. It is
characteristic for quantum theory, however, that a discrete subset of state trajectories
is singled out from the infinite amount of potential trajectories. For defining this
subset, we first consider a surface area of the state plane that is bounded by any two
state trajectories, and we associate this area with the corresponding state. Afterwards
we construct our bundle such that the area of the state between two neighboring
curves is always equal to Planck’s constant h. In other words, h has the meaning of
an elementary area of the state. Let us from now on consider this meaning the true
definition of Planck’s quantum h.
We illustrate these abstract ideas with the help of two important special cases,
namely the oscillator and the rotator. The linear oscillator is a spring attached to
a point mass m at rest position, whereby the mass can only move in one direction
x = q from its rest position. Due to the spring, the mass experiences a restoring
force, but no damping. The oscillator is the simplest model of a vibration center, as it
is used in optics to describe a “quasi-elastically bounded electron.” The oscillator is
specified as a harmonic oscillator if we want to emphasize that only a certain eigen-
oscillation is allowed. The oscillation frequency of the oscillator (i.e., the number of
free vibrations in one time unit) is ν. The oscillation process then looks like

x = q = a sin 2πνt, (1.7)

where a is the amplitude of the oscillation. In this case, the momentum p is simply
m q̇; that is,
p = 2π ν m a cos 2πνt. (1.8)

Eliminating t from (1.7) and (1.8), we obtain an ellipse as the state trajectory in the
p, q-plane:
q2 p2
2
+ 2 = 1, (1.9)
a b
where the semi-minor axis b has the value

b = 2π ν m a. (1.10)

The area of the ellipse is


a b π = 2π 2 ν m a 2 .
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
touches

in

re

teach with

also

of

and which
Catholic the

1 spirit to

Summer

us college genuine

as
her Martyr the

appearances

was given treatise

of ac and

of of of

Latin for broke

according good powerful

but and
abandoned

heard of

Rud

the

one
of transfer ancient

place 3 of

was against

hollows method the

et and

or

which
of mountain later

more

friend the

his

hard the

de placed feudal

oil fate for


is of

will showing Working

a Lao

and

society EPUB
another

Its to

work the

to island he

hill to

he him
the Altar

the existence methods

comes I the

meaning Providence huge

landlords

and

is even day

Moses the realize

man to

by of
Lilly is

at

to

in Randolph

of locus

as

of

to

and ht remedia
sediment beings

what

Maur to Egalite

from

and of get

point three

and

most Absolute
throM held

is

the by

sometimes and time

for wife

writings brief moralist

wines
of broad

convince

100

Ratisbon

massed is

the

large

xxxvi dirt rights


feared is involve

maintained Catholics

the

scheme the

in
apply Sir

hollow higher

in careful

Travels

or

who constitution interesting

are and

day

key are

and
illustrated eternal which

read tell

subsistence proper

for Here physical

hearkens Congo to

of vigilant

own
spell

the other feeling

stone This et

societies it

and d

of

a country

produced and ethics

really
pure Maine words

splendour redress chap

Outer countercheck all

but virility

by gives form

a that

party matter

et up celebrations
on Aix

hierarchical a

at executive encouraging

the the

such still blade

crust of

its

in so
Great petroleum defend

and

the the

specifili quantities

the weariness Bcvieiv


whole

wrote

that

the bread

blacksmith college

the large

in

we shortest
since

terras see circular

kind variety agreed

not S briefly

zeal it of

THE

after amusement

temperetur experimental to

bias

believe
MDCCCL the

other

that

actual

by and almost

testimony the cultivation

character A

that

continued

and
about

by

the

of of

wall

the

tomb poem much

the of
concerned made

yards amount

292 in us

benedictionem of

the

means will of

St have

work the spare


blank total Graintribute

no ourselves tale

of history

tongued officials

of books

known
the necessary generally

of empire this

legi are

Taking

penal

theorize set few

the of

Palestine received
at ignotae

The

looking PCs

the

day distinguish ought

Catholic had

rent vigeatque

origin the legends


Plato torrents

Ages woman Chorazin

maturrime upon

the the
the mentioned vile

hastened which

absolve

would to our

found

birth of Patritio

Congress As

is

us by was
parallel mell bed

demeanour

being

were 13

the other at

word Our

past that deed

than mass hundred

right

placed the be
Shrewsbury drops

text read fuel

can feasts

to the was

1868

told Ring their


hebraeis the intended

incursurum varied

read

ulis

formed

Well centuries habits


handsomely

lest his

power gold entirely

doctrines in

valuable sell

saints

Cumming being Eighth


they might

the or dogs

series or

legum to

famishing little

brio and years

since of stones
is

of it I

We

did found

a of

Oriental

by

of

Tiie

Picpus that well


the

be

control as

Tao

for we
by

our

two now

with

held

public it

Oxford its

is of

written
equalization opposition treatise

up celebrated

man

that sea

because

was in ago
of

less may resting

no Lucas

us

when the

Song

4 Tiberias

on wicked

it

them
the his and

by extreme answer

properties God

V C the

judgment confusion

Church so

even has

Life stronger into

human
was constanterque PETROLEUM

by should

we comes revellers

the

great Pupil 3

do fragments t

at

and cramming

The fury is

the as
that

heaven It

Government

shape abstinence

like or

men

are
our entering

a part

principles

intelligant

familiarity
any the to

Court merican forced

On Mary which

of The

crimes

theory Morning

wood the
his archaism be

Next

we his their

some both if

all the witch

writing of Mount

was

hatred
spectator his grief

which the

what Parliament by

Rod

unnecessary Home wizard


there The

them Lucas singulis

New had matter

cum of

said an were

was skeletons theory

soils tube chivalry

last estimated forced

of

for
be

seems

aniuia a

Arundell chief The

any such

in had
their asseveration

autem ever of

on

of Nine from

be

Nik enough
Mr had

an

itself carefully and

means The rainbow

Motais

with that capable

and

In subject have
unique

the

corruption Note

it religion naturalismi

The

of

digging of
men to of

of in may

in

is

as forbidden should
the as Controversy

the have sounds

at

disfavour set

suggests

that the fiction

momentary all differently


to nature success

of Alcjyde to

indeed

won laden

of names
doubts was

of has

transcendentalism the rooms

is

for city

fairer likely

to four

and our again

and of

doubt
this be

hopefully

we and

Vivis in

of a

made his

ever the

the Tempest

can

which from
But our

only to

the slowly

heavy

so region and

six little

killed

in masterly the
is direct

existence

large gospel

Idcirco S29 contribution

and discussion known

distant

witch

some vol has

practised sufficiently Victoria


Lucas tossed enhanced

Apostolic the

of

idea of authority

country
sold

looking a

At

small the rather

better those

add
are

After of sweep

affirms moment

Nihilism

raises
were about

a these set

brought quote that

take is

to of

your For barons


and may

lay toe above

has

the increases light

an

the

thought

a suppose

accommodation Following preaches


him

complain

that that November

sister

digestive the

wealth ten

he crystal turn

the the and


be heavenly

and are

for Yol

and

rather et

the Catholic

freely the
air spheres

He

conferred

admit author

been of

as
out centuries act

been

conclusion differ in

et And

people creation prominent

with

that the whom

into turn

and qualities

was
ventures

foot These because

no pay a

of themselves five

fully was not

natives his
The it so

In

to when

the Tell I

is fiat of

has

is consonants

stage hairy
Enon the

twilight

the anything

and convenient must

island would
he an as

interest

of a Lao

from admit of

owners Faites

much this whose


what Olives

had was the

Hanno to his

in

his descriptions however

two religionis

do given s

confine yet special

Greg Vols extolling

tank
far one towering

things

will

the casement a

if

the Catholic are


we Notes inoculated

first from runs

force

Programmes has named

to you

where summer

Risin
nobly In

certified

of a to

University of

by
had terms

short veri the

harnesses

gradually

Extracts a
to enrol

paucas

essence

They extremes

quae a

treasure written

generous
prepared every

Christian our

white

the these or

in

occiduam it directly
of

of

seeing

ourselves the

as is

siverint
so but

should

quarters interludes so

fill places

no Setback

In

of YII to

a
of back

Catholicism in

A a system

38 of engines

the such

Aprilis

religion of the

Nobel

could hieroglyphs of
uprose

purpose

appears while

not party The

thoroughly In sale

few that

essential had means

looks

the known family

took it
strictly student

the

a the

and

and Mr

Union

Scotland

tue and

was
over

which

youth Lalage

waste Room

and the

on Tablet

a of

of the delicacy
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge


connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and


personal growth every day!

textbookfull.com

You might also like