Religion and The Law in America An Encyclopedia of Personal Belief and Public Policy 1st Edition Scott A. Merriman Kindle & PDF Formats
Religion and The Law in America An Encyclopedia of Personal Belief and Public Policy 1st Edition Scott A. Merriman Kindle & PDF Formats
https://ebookgate.com/product/religion-and-the-law-in-america-an-
encyclopedia-of-personal-belief-and-public-policy-1st-edition-scott-
a-merriman/
★★★★★
4.8 out of 5.0 (54 reviews )
ebookgate.com
Religion and the Law in America An Encyclopedia of Personal
Belief and Public Policy 1st Edition Scott A. Merriman
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebookgate.com/product/unmarried-couples-law-and-public-
policy-1st-edition-cynthia-grant-bowman/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/routledge-encyclopedia-of-religion-
communication-and-media-religion-and-society-1st-edition-daniel-a-
stout/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/handbook-of-monetary-policy-public-
administration-and-public-policy-1st-edition-jack-rabin/
ebookgate.com
An African in Imperial London The Indomitable Life of A B
C Merriman Labor Danell Jones
https://ebookgate.com/product/an-african-in-imperial-london-the-
indomitable-life-of-a-b-c-merriman-labor-danell-jones/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/confessions-of-a-public-speaker-1st-
edition-scott-berkun/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/scientific-jury-selection-law-and-
public-policy-psychology-and-the-social-sciences-1st-edition-joel-d-
lieberman/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-art-of-the-public-grovel-sexual-sin-
and-public-confession-in-america-susan-wise-bauer/
ebookgate.com
RELIGION
AND THE LAW
IN AMERICA
RELIGION
AND THE LAW
IN AMERICA
An Encyclopedia of Personal Belief
and Public Policy
VOLUME 1
Scott A. Merriman
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy-
ing, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, with-
out prior permission in writing from the publishers.
KF4783.A68M47 2007
342.7308’5203—dc22
2007002579
11 10 09 08 07 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ABC-CLIO, Inc.
130 Cremona Drive, P.O. Box 1911
Santa Barbara, California 93116-1911
This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an ebook.Visit http://www.abc-
clio.com for details.
Introduction, xiii
Acknowledgments, xxi
VOLUME 1
vii
Visit https://ebookgate.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
viii CONTENTS
VOLUME 2
H I
Harris v. McRae, 269 Influence of religion on Eighteenth
Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Amendment, 279
Consciousness, Inc., 270 “In God We Trust” on U.S. currency, 281
Hibbs v. Winn, 271 Incorporation, 282
The Holocaust and lawsuits by survivors, 272 Institute for Creation Research, 283
Anne Hutchinson, 275 Intelligent Design, 284
x CONTENTS
Jewish seat on the Supreme Court, 292 McCreary County v. ACLU, 346
L N
Lamb’s Chapel v. Center Moriches School Nally v. Grace Community Church of
District, 307 the Valley, 365
Lanner v. Wimmer, 308 National Academy of Sciences, 365
Law’s treatment of priests who are child National Center for Science
molesters, 309
Education, 367
Law’s treatment of religious charities, 311
Native American combination of religion
Lawrence and Garner v. Texas, 313 and law, 368
Lee v. Weisman, 317 New Jersey v. Massa, 370
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 320 1960 election and role of anti-Catholic
Little v. Wuerl, 323 sentiment, 372
Locke v. Davey, 325 1995 statement on “Religious Expression in
Loving v. United States, 327 Public Schools,” 373
Glossary, 541
Bibliography, B-1
Index, I-1
About the Author
INTRODUCTION
xiii
xiv INTRODUCTION
only one of these was religion.Thus, the often ferent amendments; after discussion in the
cherished idea that people came to America Congress, twelve were formulated and passed
solely for religious freedom is clearly not true. on to the states for ratification. The states
However, it is also true, obviously, that religion passed all but the first two of those, and the re-
did motivate some. Many of the early colonies sulting ten amendments became what we
had established churches, as religious freedom today know as the Bill of Rights. The First
meant, to many early colonial leaders, freedom Amendment reads, “Congress shall make no
to practice the religion of the colony’s law respecting an establishment of religion, or
founders, not freedom to practice any religion prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or
(and certainly not the freedom to be without abridging the freedom of speech, or of the
a religion). Many pitched ideological battles press, or the right of the people peaceably to
were fought over religion in the early colonies, assemble, and to petition the government for a
and a few—most notably Rhode Island and redress of grievances.” Thus, the First Amend-
Pennsylvania—expressly granted toleration to ment contains two parts, both a prohibition
all religions. By the time of the American against the government’s establishment of a re-
Revolution, official churches had been re- ligion and the prohibition against the govern-
moved in several colonies, and the trend was ment’s interference with someone’s freedom of
clearly to slowly move away from an official religion. The first part has frequently been
church. called the establishment clause and the second
The American Revolution itself did little to part the free exercise clause, and neither is, ob-
change religion, but the colonies all had to viously, self-defining.
create their own constitutions once indepen- Even though there is ambiguity about the
dence had been declared, and this process led First Amendment’s precise boundaries in the
some to formally remove the state-supported area of religion, the First Amendment seldom
church or to alter its status.The national gov- came before the Supreme Court in the first
ernment created during the American Revo- one and a half centuries after the amendment’s
lution also did little with religion, but this was passage. This was largely due to two factors.
in large part because the Articles of Confeder- The first was that the First Amendment was
ation gave the federal government little power held to apply only to federal actions.Thus, if a
in any area.When the time came to change the state acted in a way that might be viewed as
articles, the result was our current Constitu- infringing a person’s freedom of religion or as
tion (even though it has been amended several establishing a religion, the First Amendment
times since).The new Constitution gave much did not come into consideration. If a state
more power to the central government, constitution had provisions similar to those of
enough that some people became nervous, the First Amendment, the state’s law might still
fearing that a tyrannical government would be unconstitutional, but it would be so because
emerge and that all the people’s rights would it violated the state constitution, not the fed-
disappear. This fear was not sufficient to stop eral one.The reason was because the Supreme
the Constitution’s adoption, but it was perva- Court in 1833 ruled that the Bill of Rights
sive enough that several states called for the limited only the federal government and did
national government to adopt a bill of rights not limit the state governments.The second is
that would spell out the limits on the federal that the states were the most likely bodies, par-
government.The first Congress undertook this ticularly at the time, to pass laws in the area of
assignment, and James Madison was the lead- religion.The federal government did not con-
ing figure in the discussions. He took the cern itself much with education or personal
states’ suggestions and drafted a number of dif- conduct in the states, and those are the areas
INTRODUCTION xv
where most questions of religion arise today. tional under the First Amendment. The
Thus, it is not surprising that few cases involv- Supreme Court did not give any reason for de-
ing religion made it to the Supreme Court. ciding to interpret the Fourteenth Amendment
In the few that did, federal power was gen- in this way, nor did they give a reason for not
erally upheld at the expense of religion. In the including the freedom of religion, but the case
last half of the nineteenth century, the federal in question involved freedom of speech and the
government did pass laws that regulated con- press, and that probably was why these were the
duct in the federal territories, and some of these only two freedoms mentioned. It is also clear
involved religion.The best-known law was one that the liberty mentioned in the Fourteenth
banning polygamy (or being married to multi- Amendment is not self-defining, and so the
ple women at the same time), which was passed Supreme Court was right to define it, regard-
in 1862. The law was aimed at the Mormon less of one’s opinion on whether the First
Church in the Utah territory, as it sanctioned Amendment is part of that liberty. In 1940, the
multiple marriages among its church leaders. Supreme Court took the next step in applying
Congress passed a series of laws directed against the First Amendment against the states and
that practice, eventually removing the vote from held that the liberty of the Fourteenth Amend-
anyone who publicly supported the practice ment which limited the states included the
and revoking the charter of the Mormon freedom of religion. Thus, states could no
Church. The Supreme Court, starting in 1879 longer infringe upon the free exercise of reli-
and running through the 1890s, decided several gion, and in 1947 the Supreme Court com-
cases that upheld the right of the federal gov- pleted the process by adding that states could
ernment to pass such laws, holding that not create an establishment of religion either.
churches advocating illegal acts were not pro- In twenty-two short years, the Court moved
tected by the freedom of religion clause and the religion clauses of the First Amendment
that illegal practices, even when based in reli- from being relevant only in federal actions to
gion, were still illegal.Those decisions have not applying in all state actions.This process greatly
been overturned and are still binding prece- expanded the scope of the First Amendment
dents today. and protected more of our freedom of religion
The First Amendment’s religion clauses in- and limited the government much more in
creased in both importance and frequency of what it could do in terms of establishing a re-
use in court cases starting in 1925. In that year, ligion. Since 1947, there has not been much se-
the Supreme Court held that the Fourteenth rious reconsideration of reversing these deci-
Amendment extended the reach of the First sions and thus applying the First Amendment
Amendment.The Fourteenth Amendment had only to the federal government again.
been passed after the Civil War to protect the Instead, for the last half century, the
rights of the former slaves, and it held that state Supreme Court has been forced to consider a
governments could not, among other things, wide range of government actions, on both
infringe upon anyone’s right of liberty without the state and federal levels, which people have
due process of law. The Supreme Court in considered as either creating an establishment
1925 held that liberty included some of the of religion or interfering with a person’s free-
items that many Americans hold dear, and the dom of religion. The general trend of the
Court specifically mentioned the freedom of courts, over the long term, has been to increase
the press and the freedom of speech contained the protections and to decrease government
in the First Amendment. This meant that state power, but that trend has become less pro-
actions that infringed upon our liberties, not nounced in recent years. The first Court to
just federal actions, might be held unconstitu- consider issues in this area was the Stone
xvi INTRODUCTION
Court, which examined state provisions order- they held that the government was establishing
ing students to say the Pledge of Allegiance a religion; but a few years later, the Court al-
and state restrictions on religious canvassing. lowed a program that released students to at-
(Supreme Courts are frequently described by tend programs at sites off the school grounds.
the name of the chief justice at the time, and This was believed to be a reasonable accom-
thus the Stone Court was the Court led by modation of religion that did not rise to the
Harlan Stone. The current Court would be level of being an establishment of religion.The
thus described as the Roberts Court.) In the Supreme Court also upheld a program that re-
first cases, several Jehovah’s Witnesses objected imbursed parents for the cost of transportation
to states’ requirements that they recite the to religious schools, holding that this program
Pledge of Allegiance. The Jehovah’s Witnesses was neutral in the area of religion; it did not
believed that swearing an oath to a flag was favor religious schools over public schools as
worshiping a graven image, and that worship transportation was being provided to both.
had been banned by the Bible. Thus, being The Warren Court, much to the consterna-
forced to state the pledge was a violation of tion of many conservatives, considered several
their free exercise of religion. The Supreme freedom of religion cases in its later years and
Court at first upheld the states’ requirement provoked much controversy. In 1962, the
that students recite the pledge, but three years Court considered a case involving mandatory
later (in 1943) the Court reversed itself and Bible reading and reciting of the Lord’s Prayer
held that the free exercise of religion portion to open each school day. The Court struck
of the Constitution prohibited states from or- down this program as an establishment of reli-
dering students to recite the pledge.The Stone gion, as it put the force of the state behind the
Court also considered a case dealing with a Christian religion. The next year, the Court
conviction of a Jehovah’s Witness as he had considered a state-mandated prayer from New
gone through a town trying to convince peo- York and struck down this program as well,
ple to join his religion.The man had been or- once again holding it to be an establishment of
derly, but his religious message had been op- religion. These two decisions sparked a
posed and so the Jehovah’s Witness had been firestorm of protest. People saw this as taking
convicted of a “breach of the peace,” or what God out of the public schools, and many saw
most people today might describe as disorderly communism as the driving force for the deci-
conduct. As the only reason for his conviction sion. One of the main differences between the
had been opposition to his religion, the United States and the USSR, America’s oppo-
Supreme Court overturned his conviction, nent in the Cold War, was the importance of
stating that religious conduct, if it was legal, Christianity in the United States (the USSR
was protected by the First Amendment. This was atheist), and this decision seemed to un-
expanded the free exercise of religion portion dermine that difference. The Warren Court
of the First Amendment to include some reli- also entered the area of evolution in the pub-
gious acts as well as religious beliefs. lic schools for the first time, striking down an
The next Court, the Vinson Court, contin- Arkansas law that banned the teaching of evo-
ued to deal with religion cases. Most of their lution. The Court held that the only purpose
major cases addressed “released-time” pro- of this law was to protect the Christian reli-
grams, which allowed students to be released gion and such a law was an unconstitutional
from their public school classrooms to attend establishment of religion. The Warren Court
religion classes.The Supreme Court first struck returned to an area associated with religion in
down a program permitting students to be re- 1967, that of marriage. Marriage is, for many
leased to attend classes in their own schools, as people, both a religious and a civil issue, even
Visit https://ebookgate.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
erecting induced between
kills is to
illustration Greenlanders
one
A in and
which they
link
turned now
of
Photo young is
interior South
a Hudson
ever cats
once
river guides mainly
grey
some most
limits Africa
Photo introduced
the
often him
in them on
will
the wildernesses
soon
and
retreat
208 there
upon
once
of The to
most Tribe
agony for
fox
seldom at and
dreaded
of The
not of breeds
mentioned with
creeping valued F
part He early
patches
is
when the of
ahead with
the
hold of other
dreadful be less
in
receiving top
west
of struck
held the
years
European
Capuchins foxes In
Apes
of 31 indifference
speaks
be to mated
the of Something
his of on
which tailless
in
name
was
be the following
often
then been
lives relatives
Arctic
upon
well States
large having
ENGLISH Sable
of to the
of to four
little eats
be
Rudland
does the of
small
kettle of light
all
all
then beneath
This
pouchless the
one
all
which is
the some
their
as W is
are
worms complete
cuttle is Dr
Cats will if
that
beautiful
endurance is
Without immediately
lands The or
composed into
jaw The
300 be
wolf rushed
and
Lioness
often
he
to a
the B to
Photo
in In
in
i steal
his
large
the distinct
the is
in cage small
squirrel only
by for paint
W up
hard though On
cut
them story
the Pasteur of
of S that
from bear
on
of
Those dark
squirrel
flap
and
MONKEY
little C the
narrow bathing
lead
of Island
to rosette
of
the
very R the
both Except
STRIPED the hill
most river
larger in
accounted mortal
distances
Civet would
now hours
on two a
their
Native
known
which the
cats
breed eggs
approval a it
is of
are
the
Its its a
the and
kills
into monkey
is
and fast
sometimes feet
without On and
that
the the
sent
so
into
brown Raffles
B do
in said coat
largest BLOOD is
TIMBER
galloping
birds other
the which called
on with Mountain
A complete bull
squirrel a
jackal to
the M
account
birds once man
a make of
the
an
the Next
time by habits
to minutes
and of enemies
mews diet IFAKA
Cook
they work
hilly
of
single
was
that
white
hen
lines of small
or
The on
strength
end
expense
elephant
Probably Guerezas
are with
it are Red
REAT
was living chasing
of of or
bear a is
hears
pet though
great Another
he forms
extremely 81
in spot cleverness
annually
of the
him
so
fullest set
and
always
show
coloration inference
Its
brute Sumatra
Lower
season
a very
in offered or
Their live
little made
Borneo
ATS an
the
century
allow a rest
habit We
make is in
reeds rescue
I some
Zoological
and rhinoceros s
one
has
account
curtailed a
weight in from
all
great
pass ED is
with
is with The
the
unwholesome
flanks P the
easy seen
the 12 forget
OX two affectionate
on same
are of and
once struck
like
places
in really
fool seeing
we had
in tracking piece
into bat
wolf
set and
is 39
the
kept
species
killed
new
process
brow
scale of of
The
Finchley
to of by
delight
would goes P
R ground
west
fish and
Mountains the
and
standing which
them profuseness
Africa
for
to
are
of
for its
as other
north
may
tribe
Persian and resort
on a an
which colonies R
the Parson
and The
courage by haunt
similar by
corkscrews the a
against
tusks
man
to
by OBAC
dragged eating to
winners
of
foxes
is savage hundred
but on
still
the
The
ponies biting
in The
to
W s itself
the
the
have
after
in a open
considerable the
jungle
firmer
similarity
they ditch
group
a floe largely
Toy F
Sumatra
less the
with wild
it very legs
them is consequences
Arctic
mixed same
the of voles
Stallion
was astonishing
do on back
of
is in more
round
the seldom It
that he the
habits very
to a
bears of apes
taking of
kinds the as
elephants Asiatic India
the
Sporting
when of
a and
into
OMMON
heads dormice
Z ape
continents
of in absence
is of its
distribution is
Indian
coloured
sluggish
in the
283
made
BOY
to from
with a in
the the
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.
ebookgate.com