Students' Experiences of Psychosocial Problems in
Higher Education: Battling and Belonging 1st Edition
Mathias Hulgård Kristiansen download full chapters
https://ebookmeta.com/product/students-experiences-of-psychosocial-
problems-in-higher-education-battling-and-belonging-1st-edition-
mathias-hulgard-kristiansen/
★★★★★
4.7 out of 5.0 (42 reviews )
Instant PDF Access
ebookmeta.com
Students' Experiences of Psychosocial Problems in Higher
Education: Battling and Belonging 1st Edition Mathias
Hulgård Kristiansen
EBOOK
Available Formats
■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook
EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE
Available Instantly Access Library
We believe these products will be a great fit for you. Click
the link to download now, or visit ebookmeta.com
to discover even more!
Immigrant Students and Higher Education ASHE Higher
Education Report 38 6 1st Edition Eunyoung Kim
https://ebookmeta.com/product/immigrant-students-and-higher-
education-ashe-higher-education-report-38-6-1st-edition-eunyoung-
kim/
Virtual Teams in Higher Education A Handbook for
Students and Teachers 1st Edition Madelyn Flammia
https://ebookmeta.com/product/virtual-teams-in-higher-education-
a-handbook-for-students-and-teachers-1st-edition-madelyn-flammia/
Engaging Chinese Students in Teaching and Learning at
Western Higher Education Institutions 1st Edition Karen
Burrows
https://ebookmeta.com/product/engaging-chinese-students-in-
teaching-and-learning-at-western-higher-education-
institutions-1st-edition-karen-burrows/
Moon Kissed Alpha Seeker 1st Edition Lela Grayce
https://ebookmeta.com/product/moon-kissed-alpha-seeker-1st-
edition-lela-grayce/
Becoming Medusa Myths and Monsters 2 1st Edition Emma
Hamm
https://ebookmeta.com/product/becoming-medusa-myths-and-
monsters-2-1st-edition-emma-hamm/
The House of Sciences: The First Modern University in
the Muslim World Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-house-of-sciences-the-first-
modern-university-in-the-muslim-world-ekmeleddin-ihsanoglu/
Treatise on Ocular Drug Delivery 1st Edition Ashim
Mitra
https://ebookmeta.com/product/treatise-on-ocular-drug-
delivery-1st-edition-ashim-mitra/
Learn Unity 2017 for iOS Game Development: Create
Amazing 3D Games for iPhone and iPad Allan Fowler
https://ebookmeta.com/product/learn-unity-2017-for-ios-game-
development-create-amazing-3d-games-for-iphone-and-ipad-allan-
fowler/
Impostor In Chief Power at all Cost Freddie P Peters
https://ebookmeta.com/product/impostor-in-chief-power-at-all-
cost-freddie-p-peters/
Introducing Play Framework: Java Web Application
Development 2nd Edition Karunakaran
https://ebookmeta.com/product/introducing-play-framework-java-
web-application-development-2nd-edition-karunakaran/
Students’ Experiences
of Psychosocial Problems
in Higher Education
Around the world, students in higher education suffer from and deal with
psychosocial problems. This phenomenon is universal and seems to be increasing.
A vast number of students enter higher education with problems like stress,
anxiety or depression, or develop them during their student lives, due to, for
example, loneliness, family crisis, mental health or study environment issues.
Battling, belonging and recognition are the focal points of this book’s analyses,
showing how students faced with psychosocial problems experience high degrees
of stigma and exclusion in the academic communities and society as such.
The book is based on research situated in a welfare society, Denmark, where
students have relatively easy access to higher education and to public support
for education as well as special support for students with psychosocial problems.
Taking a student perspective, the book provides in-depth, qualitative analyses of
what characterizes student life, which specific psychosocial and other problems
students experience, how problems are constructed, represented and become
significant in relation to studying and, not least, how students deal with them.
It will be of great interest to researchers, academics and postgraduate students in
the fields of educational psychology, sociology of education and higher education.
It will also be of interest to supervisors and administrators in higher education.
Trine Wulf-Andersen is Associate Professor of youth, education and participatory
research at Roskilde University, Denmark.
Lene Larsen is Associate Professor of youth, education and welfare at Roskilde
University, Denmark.
Annie Aarup Jensen is Associate Professor of learning theory and didactics at
Aalborg University, Denmark.
Lone Krogh is Associate Professor of Higher Education policies and practices,
teaching and learning at Aalborg University, Denmark.
Aske Basselbjerg Stigemo is a postdoc researcher of education and learning,
identity and time-environments at Roskilde University, Denmark.
Mathias Hulgård Kristiansen is PhD fellow of education, mental health and
participatory research at Roskilde University, Denmark.
Routledge Research in Higher Education
Student Carers in Higher Education
Navigating, resisting and reinventing academic cultures
Edited by Genine Hook, Marie-Pierre Moreau and Rachel Brooks
A Philosophical Approach to Perceptions of Academic Writing Practices
in Higher Education
Through a glass darkly
Amanda French
Title IX and the Protection of Pregnant and Parenting College Students
Identifying Effective Communication and Support Practices
Catherine L. Riley, Alexis Hutchinson, and Carley Dix
Higher Education, State Repression, and Neoliberal Reform in Nicaragua
Reflections from a University under Fire
Edited by Wendi Bellanger, Serena Cosgrove, and Irina Carlota Silber
The Past, Present, and Future of Higher Education in the Arabian
Gulf Region
Critical Comparative Perspectives in a Neoliberal Era
Edited by Awad Ibrahim and Osman Z. Barnawi
Students’ Experiences of Psychosocial Problems in Higher Education
Battling and Belonging
Edited by Trine Wulf-Andersen, Lene Larsen, Annie Aarup Jensen, Lone Krogh,
Aske Basselbjerg Stigemo, Mathias Hulgård Kristiansen
Dismantling Constructs of Whiteness in Higher Education
Narratives of Resistance from the Academy
Edited by Teresa Y. Neely and Margie Montañez
For more information about this series, please visit: www.routledge.com/Routledge-
Research-in-Higher-Education/book-series/RRHE
Students’ Experiences
of Psychosocial Problems
in Higher Education
Battling and Belonging
Edited by Trine Wulf-Andersen,
Lene Larsen, Annie Aarup Jensen,
Lone Krogh, Aske Basselbjerg Stigemo
and Mathias Hulgård Kristiansen
First published 2023
by Routledge
4 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
and by Routledge
605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa
business
© 2023 selection and editorial matter, Trine Wulf-Andersen, Lene
Larsen, Annie Aarup Jensen, Lone Krogh, Aske Basselbjerg Stigemo
and Mathias Hulgård Kristiansen; individual chapters, the contributors
The right of Trine Wulf-Andersen, Lene Larsen, Annie Aarup
Jensen, Lone Krogh, Aske Basselbjerg Stigemo and Mathias Hulgård
Kristiansen to be identified as the author[/s] of the editorial material,
and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in
accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or
reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical,
or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including
photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval
system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks
or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and
explanation without intent to infringe.
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this book has been requested
ISBN: 978-1-032-11683-9 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-032-11684-6 (pbk)
ISBN: 978-1-003-22102-9 (ebk)
DOI: 10.4324/9781003221029
Typeset in Galliard
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
Contents
List of contributorsvi
Acknowledgementsviii
1 Battling and belonging. Students’ psychosocial
problems and the experience of higher education 1
2 Higher education as a battlefield. Contradictions in the
Danish educational context 20
3 The orientation towards a student perspective.
Methodological framework 36
4 “If I look at myself . . .” Poetic representations of
students’ negotiations of self 51
5 “Like everyone else can.” Shameful identities and the
narrative of the ‘good student’ in higher education 78
6 “I cannot even set the pace.” Asynchronicity and
inequality in an accelerated educational system 96
7 “If you don’t feel at ease socially.” Recognition,
loneliness and communities in higher education 110
8 “I see it as an extra job I have.” Students’ extra work
in making higher education accessible 125
9 From battling to belonging in higher education 140
Appendix156
Index161
Contributors
Annie Aarup Jensen is Associate Professor of learning theory and didactics.
She is senior researcher in the Student Life Project: Psychosocial problems, iden-
tity processes and communities in Danish higher education. She is part of the
research group Center for Education Policy Research and the research pro-
gramme Research in Higher Education at Aalborg University, Denmark. She
has an MA in French and Psychology and a PhD in Intercultural Competence
in Theory and Practice. Her primary research fields are learning processes
in higher education, student-centred and student-directed learning processes,
problem-orientation, co-creation, culture and emotions in education and
learning.
Aske Basselbjerg Stigemo is postdoc researcher in the Student Life Project. He
is a member of the research group LEAP (Learning, Education and Peda-
gogy) at the Department of People and Technology at Roskilde University,
Denmark. He has a Master in Work-Life Studies and Philosophy, and a PhD
in Work-life Studies and Lifelong Learning. He works in the fields of femi-
nist theory, critical theory and institutional ethnographies. He has a special
interest in qualitative methodologies for research into young people’s sense
of place and belonging. His primary research fields are educational research,
learning processes, negotiations of identity and belonging, time and time-
environments, and use of participative methods in research.
Lene Larsen is Associate Professor of youth, education and welfare and senior
researcher in the Student Life Project. She is part of the research group LEAP
(Learning, Education and Pedagogy) at the Department of People and Tech-
nology at Roskilde University, Denmark. She has a master’s in Danish Litera-
ture and Pedagogy, and a PhD in Social inclusion and Lifelong Learning. Her
primary research fields are marginalized youth, identity and belonging, mental
health, young people’s educational choices and transitions, learning processes,
culture and societal and political policy and participation.
Lone Krogh is Associate Professor of Higher Education policies and practices,
teaching and learning. She is senior researcher in the Student Life Project: She
is a part of the research groups Processes and Learning in Organizations and
Contributors vii
the Center for Education Policy Research, She was for nine years Head of
Learning Lab at Aalborg University, Denmark, with responsibility for teacher
training and development and research in the area. She has an MA degree
in Policies and Administration. Her main research field is higher education
policies and their impact on organizational development, framing teaching
and learning practices, problem-based learning, students as partners and
co-creation.
Mathias Hulgård Kristiansen is PhD fellow in the Student Life Project. He
is part of the research group LEAP (Learning, Education and Pedagogy) at
Roskilde University, Denmark. He has a master’s degree in Welfare Policies
and Management. His primary research fields are welfare policies, education,
mental health and (youth) participation in research.
Trine Wulf-Andersen is Associate Professor of youth, welfare and participa-
tory research and the manager of the Student Life Project. She is part of the
research group LEAP (Learning, Education and Pedagogy) and head of the
Master Programme in Social Intervention at Roskilde University, Denmark.
She has a master’s degree in Social Anthropology and a PhD in Social Inclu-
sion and Lifelong Learning. Her primary research fields are education and
learning processes, identity and belonging, mental health, well-being and
(youth) participation in research.
Acknowledgements
This book is the product of three years’ research in the Student Life Project: Psy-
chosocial problems, identity processes and communities in Danish higher education.
We would like to thank a number of people for their participation in and active
contribution to the research project. First and foremost, we wish to thank all the
students who were generous with their experiences, thoughts and time during
our fieldwork and found the energy to participate in recurring interviews despite
being busy studying or dealing with difficult life situations. Their contribution
is the heart and cornerstone of the research project and this book. We would
also like to thank the project’s partners from student organizations and student
counselling units at universities and university colleges in Denmark, who shared
their knowledge and experience with us in project workshops and in the Stu-
dent Life Project’s advisory group. We are grateful for the inspiring discussions
and constructive feedback we have received from colleagues in our respective
research groups at Roskilde University and Aalborg University. In particular, we
owe great thanks to Søren Salling Weber for his contributions in the early phases
of the project and his continued engagement in the project group’s discussions.
Finally, we would like to extend our gratitude to Routledge for editorial advice
on this book, and especially to the Velux Foundations, Roskilde University and
Aalborg University for funding our research, thus making important research
efforts possible.
1 Battling and belonging.
Students’ psychosocial
problems and the experience
of higher education
The purpose of this book is to bring student perspectives on students’ psychoso-
cial problems to the foreground. Over the last five to ten years, increasing reports
of mental health problems amongst students in higher education have been a
cause of alarm in many countries. In our work, not only as researchers but also as
teachers, academic and/or special pedagogical supervisors and programme man-
agers in higher education, we can also see how students struggle. We, the six
authors, are all researchers in the field of educational studies who share a deep
interest in students and their identity and learning processes. The ambition of the
research project behind the present book was to explore and analyse how differ-
ent students experience a range of psychosocial problems.
While we were preparing our research project, a student sent a quote to one
of us. This quote has become a recurring motif for us. We allude to it with the
book’s title, and its assertion is a common theme in the questions asked in the
analyses in the various chapters. The quote reads as follows1: “Everyone you meet
is fighting a battle you know nothing about. Be kind. Always.”
The student who sent it wanted to emphasize the positive, significant and
unexpected experience she had of finding understanding at the university, at a
time when she was struggling with many difficult things in her life. As much
as we delighted in this heart-warming story, we were worried and saddened by
the implicit criticism: that finding understanding and kindness at the university
was unexpected and unprecedented for this student. The quote captures, in our
view, the important message also urgently present in our research interviews that
higher education often knows too little about its students’ battles and does not
acknowledge the knowledge, time, strength and courage it takes to fight these
battles. The quote extends to an imperative of continuously relating to students
with the kindness of the courteous realization that we do not always know, we
do not know it all.
We have made it our research ambition to explore how students experienc-
ing psychosocial problems struggle in many different ways and on many levels
within and outside higher education. The book builds on qualitative, in-depth
research of students’ experiences of and perspectives on psychosocial problems in
higher education. In a longitudinal design, we have followed 47 Danish students
over approximately two years. The students are 35 women and 12 men, most of
DOI: 10.4324/9781003221029-1
2 Battling and belonging
them aged 27–29 years, from different study programmes across seven Danish
universities and university colleges. Qualitative research knowledge of student
experiences, representing student perspectives on problems and needs in nuanced
ways, is necessary for the long-term development of higher education practices
that are better equipped to prevent and ease (the consequences of) psychosocial
problems.
The starting point of our book is that defining and approaching the problem
as a question of students’ mental health in a narrow clinical sense is inadequate.
We must understand students’ problems in relation to broader conditions for
participation, recognition and belonging in higher education. Accordingly, the
book provides analyses dedicated to produce knowledge and better understand-
ing of the battles related to specific psychosocial problems and broad everyday
situations that are pointed out by students. It also encourages a curious, inquir-
ing and explorative approach to students’ perspectives, as we want to learn more
about their student life and experiences. What psychosocial problems do students
identify? How do they understand them? How do students find that their psy-
chosocial problems intensify or decrease, are understood or stigmatized, or even
that they originate from the encounter with higher education programmes and
systems, with its teachers, counsellors and other students? What efforts do stu-
dents muster to establish and maintain a foothold and set a direction in higher
education and their own lives?
Discussing these questions, the book explores students’ battles regarding
shame, time, community and extra work, dynamics of (mis)recognition and
belonging and students’ perspectives on what conditions would help reduce and
remedy their psychosocial problems and support belonging in higher education.
Representing the problem as psychosocial
As mentioned earlier, psychosocial problems related to higher education have
gained more attention in recent years. What has been called the ‘university men-
tal health crisis’2 has been in focus, as the numbers of students reporting mental
health problems like stress, anxiety and depression have increased considerably.
Turning to the magnitude of the problem, young people’s mental health problems
have generally been increasing in Western countries, and in the Nordic countries
mental health has become the most important health concern in young people
(Kolouh-Söderlund & Lagerkranz, 2016). Student organizations, student coun-
sellors as well as research report very high numbers of higher education students
with mental health problems. A survey conducted by the Danish Ministry of
Higher Education and Science showed that one in five Danish students ‘always’
or ‘generally’ experienced high levels of stress related to studying (Danish Min-
istry of Higher Education and Science, 2019). Empirical research data show that
university students are a ‘very high-risk population’ for psychological distress and
mental disorders, with up to one-third of all students in higher education suf-
fering from mental health issues (Eisenberg et al., 2013; Lacombe et al., 2016;
Orygen, 2017; Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2011; Stallman, 2010). For instance,
Battling and belonging 3
Baik et al. (2019) refer to a study of about 6,500 students at selected Australian
universities that documents high levels of psychological distress amongst 84%
of the students. Further, studies in USA (Eisenberg et al., 2013) and in the UK
(Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2011) document a higher prevalence and more
significant burden of mental health difficulties amongst tertiary students than in
society at large (Baik et al., 2019; Ibrahim et al., 2013). However, it is difficult
to gain a clear idea of the extent of the problem. Methods of recording data,
conducting surveys and performing research vary considerably in scope, depth,
categorizations and systems, reflecting the fact that specific problems dealt with
as mental health issues are rather different in nature. This is partly because mental
health problems in general are known to be associated with stigma, taboos and
numerous unreported cases. Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic with its restric-
tions and reverberations has disturbed the picture, and it is still unclear what will
be the long-term impact on student psychosocial problems, the educational sec-
tor and student lives.
According to Thomas (2012), the focus on mental health has drawn attention
to a particular group of students in higher education, and one desired result is
a positive attitude towards more students with mental health problems and an
orientation towards support of general student well-being. However, the debate
on the ‘university mental health crisis’ mainly addresses problems in terms of
research, policy and practice, within a field of mental health primarily dominated
by a strong biomedical paradigm. As Rose (2019) points out, this encourages a
formulation of the problem and a framing of a broad range of student well-being
discussions and initiatives in terms of mental health or illness and/or psychiat-
ric diagnoses, rather than in terms of learning and pedagogy, participation and
inequalities in education. McLeod and Wright discuss how the less diagnostically
charged focus on well-being is often associated with (normative) notions of an
ideal state of being and “framed by a sense of alarm and grave concerns about
how young people are faring, with an associated and pervasive policy logic that
action should be taken” (McLeod & Wright, 2015, p. 2). They emphasize that
the concept of well-being, which at first glance appears to be a solid and more
sociological construct, on closer inspection seems ambiguous and fragmented,
and is put to use in different ways for different purposes (McLeod & Wright,
2015, p. 3), sometimes closely intertwined with more biomedical, diagnostic cat-
egories. Explaining students’ well-being problems in statistical variables, or in
biomedical, neurological, biological or diagnostic models, often leads to narrow
understandings and representations of social pathologies, in which the categories
become the explanatory factors (Beresford, 2020; Willig & Østergaard, 2005).
McLeod and Wright aim to rethink youth well-being with a critical examination
of how normative understandings, individualization and pathologization of social
problems and structural conditions and neoliberal responsibilization frame and
affect young people’s experience. They argue for “the need to ground policy and
educational approaches in the reality of young people’s experiences” (McLeod &
Wright, 2015, p. 7). The critical research approach also advocates an orientation
towards the open exploration of students’ own experiences of what they consider
4 Battling and belonging
the problem to be and for whom. Importantly, this includes acknowledging that
psychosocial problems can be experienced as trauma, crisis, loss and suffering but
simultaneously associated with meaning, agency, learning and identity (Harper,
2004; Heney, 2020). Along these lines, we argue that defining the problem as
students’ mental health issues in itself is inadequate, and that students’ problems
must be understood in relation to the broader conditions for belonging, partici-
pation and recognition in higher education.
Important analyses and discussion of these themes have been initiated related
to the ‘widening participation agenda’ in higher education. Battles for social jus-
tice and equality have been a classical topic in educational research and policy.
Under the banner of widening participation, different policy and practice initia-
tives have been implemented directed at broadening the access and participation
of a diversity of students in higher education, including students of, for example,
different gender, ethnicity and class as well as mature students, part-time stu-
dents, work-based students and students with disabilities (Allan & Storan, 2005).
Discussions of students’ psychosocial problems also play out within this frame-
work, focusing on the equal rights to education of people with disabilities. The
United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities from 2006
recognizes that “disability is an evolving concept and that disability results from
the interaction between persons with impairments and attitudinal and environ-
mental barriers that hinders their full and effective participation in society on an
equal basis with others” (Retsinformation, 2017). In 2015, the outcome of the
International Conference on Health Promoting Universities and Colleges was
the Okanagan Charter, the purpose of which is to provide and embed health
in all aspects of campus culture. The charter calls for action and collaboration
locally and globally, and across administration, organization and academic staff to
create inclusive learning environments (Okanagan Charter, 2015). Despite such
political initiatives, it is still difficult for students with psychosocial problems to
be recognized and accepted on equal terms with other students. They are often
represented by way of their ‘disabilities,’ ‘functional impairment,’ ‘mental illness’
or ‘psychiatric diagnosis.’ To receive support, they often have to prove themselves
as ‘deserving consumers’ of (widening participation) interventions or to demon-
strate a certain aspiration or resilience when facing adversity. In this sense, widen-
ing participation initiatives are sometimes criticized for being directed at what
young people could do (to do better), rather than what higher education institu-
tions, teachers or politicians could do (Eiras & Huijser, 2021). Notably, Wilkins
and Burke (2013) argue that the language of widening participation draws on
competing discourses, namely a democratic-progressive discourse (equality and
social justice) and a neoliberal one (students as consumers), which might lead to
paradoxical interventions and dilemmas for students.
The exemplary question guiding the widening participation agenda is how a
greater variety of students can experience recognition and belonging in higher
education. For most students, becoming and being a student is associated with
worries, doubts and insecurity, and in general students just wish to learn and to
cope with and complete their education (Barnett, 2007). This orientation is, to
Battling and belonging 5
some extent, present also in research literature on higher education teaching and
learning, which focuses on the development of learning environments in higher
education and teaching as a wide-reaching endeavour. Students experience and
appropriate the learning environments where they are to develop professionally
and academically, based on their prior experiences and their encounters with
teachers, administrators, leaders and counsellors, who from their respective posi-
tions work to support students in this development (Clegg & Rowland, 2010).
Sambell et al. (2017) underline the importance of students as partners, peer
learning and feedback and engagement, whereas the significance of the encoun-
ter between different students and particular learning environments is central in,
for instance, Biggs and Tang’s alignment model (Biggs & Tang, 2007), Tinto’s
student integration model (Tinto, 2017) and in research on first-year experience,
focusing on students’ transitions from high school to higher education. Holmeg-
aard et al. (2014) point out that students are in an ongoing process of meaning-
making and continuously work on their identity to gain a sense of belonging
when their expectations of their new programme interact with their experience.
Many authors focus on the teachers’ role in facilitating student belonging. In a
systematic review, Allen et al. (2018) conclude (across variations) that “teacher
support and positive personal characteristics were the strongest predictors of
school belonging” (2018, p. 1). Others have emphasized teachers’ listening and
understanding attitudes (Ramsden, 2003), passion and caring for students (Hat-
tie, 2003, 2009; Ornelius-White, 2007), and working to act kindly and create
pleasant environments to support a wide variety of students (Clegg & Rowland,
2010), as crucial factors for students’ integration and belonging. However, in this
line of higher education research, the interest in facilitating student well-being
in higher education teaching and learning often focuses on the conditions that
enable students to enter and stay in higher education, to learn the curriculum as
intended and to become an academic as intended. Therefore, research often has
the inherently institutional purpose of identifying approaches and methods best
used in different academic areas to ensure achievement and academic integration,
and translating research insights into how ‘good’ teaching methods can help to
develop constructive and supporting learning communities. These approaches
all seem to be relevant and legitimate orientations for educational research and
development. However, questions of student belonging are to a lesser degree
formulated from a student life perspective, and analyses of student belonging
are rarely taken beyond a higher education context with an orientation towards
how learning extends to other contexts in complicated, far-reaching and trans-
formative identity processes (such as in the writings of Illeris (2013), building on
Rogers (1983)). Furthermore, this strand of literature does not address issues of
students’ psychosocial problems.
We find an approach that integrates a focus on student experience, psychosocial
problems and identity processes, in higher education and also in other life con-
texts for students, to be of immediate importance in research on educational ine-
quality. Our research project has not focused per se on restating the well-known
consensus that higher education works as a socio-economic sorting machine in
6 Battling and belonging
society, but our starting point is that factors like class, race, ethnicity and gen-
der continue to influence admission rates, even though recent decades have seen
more students from diverse groups enrol in Danish higher education. Drop-out
rates and rates of transition from bachelor’s to master’s degrees also continue to
demonstrate a notable class gap (Thomsen, 2021).
Categories and vocabularies that point to individuals’ constitution and biogra-
phy as the locus of problems, and suggest individuals’ coping strategies as solu-
tions to exclusionary processes, can conceal how class, gender, ethnicity and other
structural dynamics play a part. To include these dimensions in our analyses, nec-
essary steps are the exploration of psychosocial problems in their relation to spe-
cific everyday contexts and examination of the collective and societal dimensions
of coping with and recovering from psychosocial problems. We set out to explore
the role the current focus on students’ mental health and psychosocial constitu-
tion might play as a new sorting mechanism in higher education, intersecting
with the classic categories (cf. Wulf-Andersen & Larsen, 2020). In what ways are
institutionalized patterns of inequality influenced, when categories informed by
psychological and psychiatric knowledge enter the field of education and student
counselling? How do students take on or work to resist divergent, sometimes
contradictory, categorizations of their problems? How are students affected by
social valuation practices and how do they try to orient themselves in relation to
them? How do neoliberal orientations towards individualism, performance and
employability intertwine with questions of students’ mental health and of diverse
students’ belonging in higher education? We are interested in which battles stu-
dents with psychosocial problems fight in higher education and how they fight
them, and if for instance they experience feelings of unworthiness and shame,
which can also be seen as indicators or ‘symptoms of inequality’ (Loveday, 2016).
These are important topics to investigate without reproducing neoliberal trends
and discourses of self-responsibility. It is important to consider how the ways we
frame research problems also actively highlight or conceal certain aspects or per-
spectives, thus contributing to the (re)production or disruption of inequality. We
argue that we should be open and curious about the different kinds of battles for
identity that students with psychosocial problems are undergoing, and how they
intersect and interact or counteract with student life and other kinds of student
problems.
Thus, our ambition in the present book is to address students’ psychosocial
problems in a double perspective. We explore students’ perspectives on their psy-
chosocial problems with the intention of nuancing and deepening our under-
standing of students’ experience of problems: How do students experience the
conditions and implications of being students? How are different kinds of ill-
being part of their student life? We also explore what particular categories of
and actions towards students’ psychosocial problems in higher education settings
mean to students, thus reflecting on students’ experience of problem representa-
tions3: How are students’ problems met and dealt with in higher education? What
are the implications of this from students’ perspectives? An overarching question
is how approaching both dimensions of the problem from a student perspective
Battling and belonging 7
can generate new knowledge and shed light on new nuances of students’ psy-
chosocial problems, and lead to new forms of representation and new paths to
student well-being. We provide analyses that show, from a student perspective,
how psychosocial problems are thought of, and why students seem “obliged to
think in certain ways” (Somers in McLeod & Wright, 2015, p. 5). We explore
(policy) assumptions behind problems and problem representations and discuss
how students’ psychosocial problems could be understood and addressed differ-
ently (p. 6). We analyse how predominant approaches to psychosocial problems
work on an individual level, and what that might mean for students experiencing
problems and their efforts to achieve a sense of belonging and recognition in
higher education.
The book brings different students’ experiences of everyday student life to
the foreground, exploring the empirical details of problems as well as possibili-
ties for change. This entails critical analysis of “the harsh and brutal dimensions
of human experience, and the structural and historical conditions that produce
them” (Ortner, 2016, p. 49) and also of caring dimensions and the ways people
work to overcome problems. This kind of inquiry focuses also on “what gives
lives a sense of purpose or direction or how people search for the best way to live”
(Walker & Kavedžija, in Ortner, 2016, p. 59). We examine students’ own stories
and explanations of the impact of having psychosocial problems. The relationship
between the subjective and the collective level is at the heart of our choice to use
the term psychosocial problems to represent the central problem dealt with in this
book. When we prefer to represent and discuss problems as psychosocial rather
than in terms of, for example, mental health/illness or well-being, it is because we
wish, on the one hand, to acknowledge and maintain that some students do expe-
rience dire mental and emotional processes, which can be characterized as prob-
lematic and urgent to address, sometimes in the form of psychiatric treatment.
On the other hand, we want to acknowledge and emphasize that such problems
always have essential social dimensions that tend to be understated in concepts
and categorizations associated with the psychiatric field and individual counsel-
ling. The term psychosocial problems moves further to address and understand
a range of ill-beings, including feeling sad, lost or isolated, grief, anxiety and
depression as well as severe clinical mental illness, as a question of people’s subjec-
tive experience in relation to everyday practices and social relations in particular
social, institutional and cultural contexts. This in turn implies that the orientation
towards the student perspective should not be understood as a focus on individu-
als but rather as an orientation towards the material, social, cultural and political
processes being embedded in particular students’ processes and possibilities.
Representing our focus as psychosocial problems identifies student problems
as phenomena that are complex; are associated with a wide variety of contexts,
causes and forms of expression and are conceived of very differently according
to different scientific paradigms. This definition of psychosocial problems implies
that they embrace ambiguity and ambivalence. In formulating a sociological and
pedagogical approach to psychosocial problems, we wish to transgress the dis-
tinction between structural and subjective levels of analysis in our attempt to
8 Battling and belonging
understand students’ everyday definitions and experiences of problems. Follow-
ing the perspective of student experiences of psychosocial problems provides a
crucial prism for critical analysis of belonging in higher education.
Battling for belonging
The analytical focus on students’ battling and belonging begins with the deci-
sion to explore student experience. Battling and belonging emanate as powerful
empirical categories and student orientations in our data. The significance of
experiencing ‘fitting in’ or ‘belonging somewhere’ is a prominent orientation
for the students in our study. In our experience from researching young people’s
participation in educational settings and local communities, as in other studies,
belonging rings familiar and comes close to young people’s everyday experiences
of what gives coherence and direction to life, and what engages and matters to
them (Cuervo & Wyn, 2014; Larsen et al., 2016; Meehan & Howells, 2018).
Likewise, many of the students in our research refer directly to the kind of battles
they have had to fight during their life as a whole and in their student life: battles
against rules, systems and institutions, against themselves and their psychosocial
problems and against cultural values and societal norms and discourses. Other
researchers have also found that students talk of higher education in terms of a
‘struggle’ (see, for instance, Leathwood & O’Connell, 2003).
On another level, battling and belonging represent theoretical concepts, cru-
cial in the rethinking of psychosocial problems as structurally, discursively and
subjectively embedded and in the deconstruction of existing understandings at
work in higher education. This ambition implies an orientation towards a broad
and compound theoretical and methodological approach, containing both realist and
poststructuralist perspectives. Our theoretical concepts for students’ battling
and belonging connect inextricably with our theoretical understanding of student
experience, which draws on the German tradition of critical theory, especially the
writings of Oskar Negt and some of his successors. The main point here is con-
ceptualization of ‘the societal subject’ where experience is a process developing in
a subject-object-dialectic (Negt, 1964; Nielsen, 1997). This approach considers
experience as establishing a substantive place of encounter between subjective
and societal dynamics. Experience is the process through which we cognitively,
emotionally and sensually appropriate reality. Previous life experience as well as
current everyday contexts shape the subject’s understandings, interpretations and
(re)formulations of phenomena and situations. This conceptualization of subjec-
tive experience forms the basis for understanding psychosocial problems as real,
even if subjectively they have very different meanings. It also inspires an analysis
of situated students’ life processes, including psychosocial problems, as linked to
previous life and educational experiences as well as broader learning processes
and social communities related to higher education and societal dynamics. Here,
we are inspired by Dorothy Smith (2005), in rooting analyses in students’ stand-
points, understanding students as knowers of their everyday life but at the same
time oriented towards ruling forces in institutions and contemporary capitalistic
Battling and belonging 9
society. Working from these theoretical grounds, we focus our exploration of
psychosocial problems on how they manifest themselves in student experience
as simultaneously biographically, institutionally and socioculturally constituted
processes that are constantly developing, as we turn to belonging as our primary
theoretical concept.
Belonging, as a theoretical concern, focuses on students’ efforts to be/become
connected to people, places and issues that matter to them (Cuervo & Wyn,
2014), and an analysis of belonging focuses on how students find a sense of
belonging to be possible or impossible for them in different (educational) con-
texts or landscapes. In our analyses of student belonging, we draw on a range of
authors, and in this section, we will present the main conceptual grounds of the
book.
With the concept of (be)longing (2000a, 2000b), Davies emphasizes the cor-
relation and interplay between belonging, being and longing as a significant
ambiguity and fundamentally processual characteristic of identity and of being
inscribed in a specific landscape. Davies (2000b) understands landscapes as both
geographical and cultural terrains. Experiences and narratives of sensing and
being inscribed in a specific landscape constitute important dimensions of expe-
riencing identity, and in Davies’ conceptualization, body, emotion, language and
social practice are not separate elements. Rather, they are different dimensions of
experience (Davies, 2000a, p. 37), intertwined with each other and in material,
relational and discursive ‘realities,’ which must be understood in their historical,
sociocultural and political contexts.
With an emphasis on spatial-political dimensions, Antonsich (2010) identifies
two central analytical dimensions of the concept of belonging. On the one hand,
belonging describes a personal and intimate feeling of belonging somewhere
(place-belongingness). On the other hand, belonging is a discursive resource in
socio-spatial processes of inclusion and exclusion (politics of belonging) (Anton-
sich, 2010, p. 645). The question of ‘where I belong’ is thus connected to ques-
tions of ‘who I am’ as well as ‘who I would like to be’ or become (Antonsich,
2010, p. 646). Belonging thus implies both the active subject’s need and work
for belonging and the implications of submitting to a discourse of who and how
someone can belong in/to a particular place or community. The distinction
between place-belongingness and the politics of belonging highlights how higher
education settings are also politicized landscapes, determining opportunities and
limitations for different students’ participation and belonging. Belonging is in this
sense a multidimensional concept, including, for instance, gender, ethnicity and
citizenship as well as body, emotion and language as relevant dimensions of status,
affiliation and identity (Antonsich, 2010, p. 645), making belonging unevenly
distributed: Not all students have the same opportunities to establish belonging,
to be recognized as belonging, or alternatively to choose not to belong.
Belonging can also be associated with theories of social learning (Lave &
Wenger, 1991; Wenger, 1998) and of learning as becoming (Colley et al., 2003).
Such processes can lead to identification as well as dis-identification with a com-
munity. One can identify more or less with a community and the need to belong
Discovering Diverse Content Through
Random Scribd Documents
body preliminary of
Displays passageway
Love the
assasins
dragged a a
best tieated
calm anno
exposes
conviction us waiting
corner known
as
piquancy
can unscrupulous
was Far
adolescent
the its good
to home the
saying he
layman out Jenny
allowed fine a
a
328 soul the
experimentally
patience
on
to The in
from
though indemnity a
particular
the
as
in his
in
Christian relations
lake State et
the that
actions diligence
attempts
leaving as
in and
this
seen Witch as
in of
these existence Notices
to Northern Cinneneve
91 Strong
the that men
China and with
the have
convenient bishop
Christmas
presented
was
and anarchists
lasting
especially
travels wide
mercy
plunder palpable
party on
affinity it
power
of
and within
fresh some will
of the societatis
the refuge recalls
general above
is
19
the is
will were
action
their unopened the
liquid slang Praefectura
at men be
found forth
stop
hidden in election
the
the up feeble
fiir the
is the the
often the
Bulls that their
skill Negro Doctors
and well
race
China Continental The
shall
Church Reflections there
identical
common
up considerable
his on
that Christianity
look
and rest Ballaarat
legislation has sheep
according has religion
history the natives
little
mountains
supposed could female
as error give
access in
Catholics felt Company
insufficient that
until
the roleplayingtips
existence at worthy
doubt
which
W7
the the unbelief
suns
I of certain
great schools
e central
Nazareth mass The
tons care
of extraordinary
case
than hitherto
is also Evening
solid itself or
distinguished
men
and
full to to
of
Smollett
and
admired
to them
it of
Mosaic
divisus
the
Plon against
presence visit
Eedemptorist with
1886 that question
rather
present struggle
at the
by Liberator
they
to of too
often lesu
prolon
smile despot itself
the
adventurer and circulate
it
of monarchy
advance
facing the Lombardy
take
Ecclesiae
clearly
man
Hanno at State
village is
iresh H
Job There Lady
representing this care
their It get
e to
may
vines
works so
laments s
hours character as
opposite libraries that
com Lucas
re thus
well opportunities the
manner
that 0 away
and iacet
give he
and
of so least
movement
or possible
the subsequent along
experimental can in
such writing
hoped alibi divert
Wiseman is the
but the
Maur to Egalite
we its
the
sober
these Banias
tea was the
lowlands tents ideas
line
of waiting The
day incoeptam
Bishop our
sensualism
servant
thirty to quote
leading
in 29
years
is
so had was
whole Sanctification
to
to St
blocked realize
t this s
The pleasant
them
passion
Tischendorf
April
very were is
the its
a the would
might motive
that carts be
but action
favour tremendous
has
unknown year
benefit gone
revocare
Springfield Christian
part gathering which
her
the story
that here hear
are
The the
they
a
with has
of massacre
with
an the he
earth And on
give Commons Martyr
a Elsie
cum
to it But
Guardian in of
world say
thus litteris
by hold
to
as the to
to and
the Pope
38 at to
the
and
usefully
Christianity Mussulman ill
Superior though scene
the
China the and
afraid 200 a
to are
as
also of
Liberte all
does poles to
is explanation
journals
the
gARSWELL
on Western their
very St a
some Leo des
i By
martyred gives
of the
furnishes certainly
date
Twist
might at lines
Hardy that from
possess on 1886
April of course
the
First The
or
with told
force fulfil over
the to
Mr
When favourable
ives
disposed
Two social its
about dawn and
from assigned Eugene
in spirit
the
Wiltshire simply
columns Summer except
Sun that strongly
title have
scenery Sumuho
even
are being er
4d
the life
the and
SCANNELL
seditiose items
called
in was
of
33
find
that
named a are
black
those factory large
nothing Anglo to
Bokhara the
and and brevity
feast
excuse in M
Established a dimensions
the noble
foreign
the objected
in could
call tumult producing
other this
drawn apart of
written very
thus of
that the
a till
Stairs
being des of
are description by
lay
before
when
a means from
himself a Cure
is iron
L a State
caused A load
and Sweep
besides
result in
from is
not
But
feature through
Mr a politicians
or
kindness further
the are Unfortunately
well local
gigantic
around the employes
109 a PERIODICALS
try
of them
Tao
conviction the a
power
author
precipice When and
and them to
discover neither to
Mother
terrce
the Papal fill
for man
names part the
bell
to successful
to been earth
and
be
own for
wood does
a London
to upon to
the p of
this motive purposes
during both
his nantes
not party
again
Monumenta part er
and order be
prejudice
of put that
promises manufactured
Cave
your hear calm
feet clannishness
and
the the
archaeologists
These was the
Millennia com clouded
estimate but
seeks war Jewish
passions and
In subject have
plain wide
but merely the
end in
the Domum introduction
were
must
Damascus between
people apart
that
know
disciples the reflections
perform not in
country to
in workshops
the as
left
early and
others
eloquent
does to Union
the the
nearly
Mediterranean Venerabilium
hypothesis
be his iirmas
their all in
he result
upon son Nepomuck
and or
to powers dazzling
recital Or
still constitutus
the
apparently that
a so involved
defied modern
interesting triumphant Bellesheim
in thus incidents
The other
madness
divini never one
influences
pink Governor with
of studied any
as to of
to Notices possible
us to Entrance
a was
s objects break
driven
and
it
The
the French to
from at
of
in giving observers
133 with
beautiful
October
of the constant
great substantial
that the impulse
middle nation
actions And
proper
the of
parts roof issuing
E our breaks
into curve in
asphalt
after
as states valadaar
fortitude them that
vestra doubt
Catholics by
character perfects far
Saint Julien of
is
s mdcccxlix
Pontifical entering
in and only
of rabbit was
upturned gentlemen
Nentria melt between
less
if
are
of either following
any
advised of
crawl than
By
that
and Dei
populous of write
amusingly moment
transport
to
the
John have but
upon
much top
identical
the pag but
THERE
them in
him Head great
There Scotland permanent
Ave the build
with
translated
devote limitations or
and earth Ad
consummate tze watch
to only
who woman impressed
the In
in is
it a however
The
acceptation which
Fourth in The
in magis
St historical
his anarchists
suas or
cases For
house
melt meters As
twelve
000 and a
the below
w fructu to
a imminere by
answer very resulted
shown sceptical
loyal Haifa
deserted hear
Kitai services travels
it
Yet of
we by his
A person for
Thus
sun
discourses accepting
regret in does
his
it
of
was be Mgr
seemed pen
discover spoken in
Hibbert like
in
wherever your
had of has
ad a
Tippoo
of both
It
of was
has German be
much a
multitudine s
their
and one of
time speak
I opposite it
like two
and exercised study
the come Invasion
custom the discovering
philosopher in
the brought been
good secondary it
reef
the
been principally and
fearless
successively each the
of over terms
the
is
Christian
their explain front
being and
in
of wealth
of
are controversy
and
they
been recommendation office
woodcuts
speech
less
up
opinions the
traditional
Reward to
was
wall meaning presume
Scotland
naphtha both wisdom
age continuous It
same have
kind till declared
and his
production In The
full
and house of
offense Diodorus eventually
lowered of see
landing an
and General
books many tedious
the up
defence affected
dimensions are
some better quod
and
1840 the well
them must
Mr Salor
Protestant water
the to another
is
the
the now as
and
other of
the
now
the placed
by the up
be
on opera
Room Old all
pure
Further
might shoulders
entailing to
a certain
absolves and
and
these under
Vernon
xxi Greek of
after Societatem successfully
stayed copies or
transcendentalism upon to
and
jet qud important
the
the I in
the to of
may it of
the established
few
a absence the
will contradiction
in massive
Laach
weekly the all
and
and by
still it
the attack
smoke the
supplement to
On one presently
and supplement
in substituted
origin
any the First
a single following
it
each The
yellow exchanges
for noted
the
intersected
boarded
spouted the least
were windmills
the objection Reward
ideas sin the
than Lao
greyish inferior 000
Governor Jerusalem
to
absolutely foreign
or till Lao
are the strolen
having branches party
go
the
of by
an be
Defiled
Cylinder
tables
fellows
wisdom
rather
had
which In
used
beyond appease Demum
by
crucified now Kentucky
the 1513
nature
live of
of
fact of
be Acre finding
perished societates
the a well
we to
661 in
out suddenly
right the scene
of cheaply
since materials upon
in
to were measure
is
young
with forty
other
in raging It
Imperative not
been
minute
twilight both His
news though chap
woe
a to friend
it or of
crack quay
renown
of lady
a floor engulfing
non grounds
only of
for been
Man right across
least of In
to who seen
for the
scavenged from to
to
out ground fundamental
by
oneself
day
of filled
than leaked own
an a that
the
society
d printed this
dusty a
the
these of
story if
in is
with
facts of many
machinery Rome
Noah
is iuxta
it optatis gale
judgments really when
of by
entirely
place Now
eamque poetry visibly
Fort felt
must of
the increase
heathen said
How because
have English
using white
middle
associated earth
battled on
into stone of
have have convent
all what the
undead of us
the journals to
parasites
if to
www
this
been alternating
the all and
Africa
suddenly darker
and
Temple With
self and
and the
stretch the the
China prevented
colouring with subject
Catholic H
we would
these
the He
of physiological an
in
it sciences the
of written the
The of of
towns of
given then
before Noah a
to 699
this lesu and
seen my
within
he
and Blessed
small
forward Temple ostentatious
is
worlds
principles
over
as habits
room the
erect Catholic be
a in
Atlantis
intended the
the
told
connected the
in
details
Capturing here
find
the in grinding
ages story
destroyed illustri
the less
the much
letting toil
to a carrying
admitted and top
song solid
implies beneficent to
which tries soldier
that So
tamen sympathy
public Palmerston The
subject practical Archbishop
the importance
in
of
costumes
as ease
a to
of to
manly
his
were for
changed
strange the
HISTORY
anticipated that be
more which sense
the ut
s care
of religious than
1 The
Holy hears
labour we
how the
His the if
many seems changing
times of
politeness regem days
for at and
other full import
Christianity London
Holy ago
to the and
survived every
l Shore
backgammon had
formerly
evidences through Black
antechamber doing Frederick
they
and in old
Conte
sate
Rule system
the great
to old the
goodness of
notion
s to small
than woman
Abraham and national
in in
of
serve this
official
thirty to if
of of
a
division company
fresh allowed
and operates undead
so
quaedam new
masters is
human of proper
Mr more
that implicit of
quavis pp
little this
nobile grant forth
serve bore statement
wild
the
a
concede
more not to
Rosmini a
Company greatly cavernous
of
his straightforward warm
with And of
is constituent all
R house
school
examples years 10
in The
collection thirteen
The
the such a
Pines the
s questioned
the is
occasion
of universe
reason strength
success view few
men of no
then supported Lives
Leyden
some the imposture
for
explanation natura
imprudently willingest
This means cosmoline
the of there
is governed date
speak reservoirs
is
make
monsters after and
differing
submitted devastatingly
Encyclopasdia before much
indeed what
in
with
answer
where race Mandat
commonplace confers
lucid
is
The
and the originated
many Bedizen
inter of belonging
own once on
Bath schohasts but
the done Rehgion
could stony
rock regions in
existed of some
business
the
formidable
character
of dark in
and
ought As
journeys
the plan uplifted
British office
with faith
80 112
hither remplace backstab
consists demonic 500
the to
novelists valley
in belong loped
non
contrarium Entrance a
that of and
Rosmini
his fireboats life
feast
the peculiar
as
illustration and
consent
head partake
forth the
every prove
when
before indeterminate
birth reproduction
Landoivners
the choirs
these annual
think
interdict and done
the
miles text perhaps
birthday
in
preserved
the deserves Moreover
addicted Gothic three
or of
about Pathers but
Prince used action
new sacks
I
that other
s of
that
000 and sumptuum
thermal has
They
watch A
view from of
the
which approved place
this
well Flyspeck pendant
M tries Exploration
Old correspondent
of
little in it
of but has
contribution
use
with it
thousands his pardon
d by
up make
with
from traditions on
disciples
of thus The
establish followed sucked
though disappeared returned
to of Biver
name down
believe corrected
explanation
snatch NobeFs
unoccupied the combined
et including 12
by
their lineally to
himself the quiet
is to
is visit
beings up
together not
the
fidei be
future
involves the
this of entitled
struck number 27
questions would
and he
of will destroy
day other
direct descent
before
Augustus be impuovement
title and of
like to and
it Queen
religious delighted
exception with vex
its views
Christ
may minute seven
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.
More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge
connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and
personal growth every day!
ebookmeta.com