Climate Politics and the Impact of Think Tanks 1st

ed. Edition Alexander Ruser pdf download

https://ebookmass.com/product/climate-politics-and-the-impact-of-
think-tanks-1st-ed-edition-alexander-ruser/

★★★★★
4.6 out of 5.0 (84 reviews )

PDF Instantly Ready

ebookstep.com
 Climate Politics and the Impact of Think Tanks 1st ed.
Edition Alexander Ruser

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library

 We believe these products will be a great fit for you. Click
the link to download now, or visit ebookmass.com
to discover even more!

The Future of Think Tanks and Policy Advice Around the

World 1st Edition James Mcgann

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-future-of-think-tanks-and-policy-
advice-around-the-world-1st-edition-james-mcgann/

Think Tanks in Australia: Policy Contributions and

Influence Trent Hagland

https://ebookmass.com/product/think-tanks-in-australia-policy-
contributions-and-influence-trent-hagland/

Climate Extremes and Their Implications for Impact and

Risk Assessment 1st Edition Jana Sillmann (Editor)

https://ebookmass.com/product/climate-extremes-and-their-implications-
for-impact-and-risk-assessment-1st-edition-jana-sillmann-editor/

Sustainability and Financial Risks: The Impact of Climate

Change, Environmental Degradation and Social Inequality on
Financial Markets 1st ed. Edition Marco Migliorelli
https://ebookmass.com/product/sustainability-and-financial-risks-the-
impact-of-climate-change-environmental-degradation-and-social-
inequality-on-financial-markets-1st-ed-edition-marco-migliorelli/
Risk Journalism between Transnational Politics and Climate
Change 1st ed. Edition Ingrid Volkmer

https://ebookmass.com/product/risk-journalism-between-transnational-
politics-and-climate-change-1st-ed-edition-ingrid-volkmer/

Read & Think Spanish, 4th Premium Edition The Editors Of

Think Spanish

https://ebookmass.com/product/read-think-spanish-4th-premium-edition-
the-editors-of-think-spanish/

The Climate Question: Natural Cycles, Human Impact, Future

Outlook Eelco J. Rohling

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-climate-question-natural-cycles-
human-impact-future-outlook-eelco-j-rohling/

How Rich Asians Think: A Think and Grow Rich Publication

(Official Publication of the Napoleon Hill Foundation) 1st
Edition John C. Shin
https://ebookmass.com/product/how-rich-asians-think-a-think-and-grow-
rich-publication-official-publication-of-the-napoleon-hill-
foundation-1st-edition-john-c-shin/

Seismic Design and Analysis of Tanks Gian Michele Calvi

https://ebookmass.com/product/seismic-design-and-analysis-of-tanks-
gian-michele-calvi/
ALEXANDER RUSER

CLIMATE
POLITICS
AND THE
IMPACT
OF THINK
TANKS
SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE
IN GERMANY AND THE US
Climate Politics and the Impact of Think Tanks
 Alexander Ruser

Climate Politics and

the Impact of Think
Tanks
Scientific Expertise in Germany and the US
Alexander Ruser
Zeppelin University
Friedrichshafen, Germany

ISBN 978-3-319-75749-0    ISBN 978-3-319-75750-6 (eBook)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75750-6

Library of Congress Control Number: 2018935411

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the pub-
lisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the
material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The
publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institu-
tional affiliations.

Cover illustration: Gale S. Hanratty / Alamy Stock Photo

Printed on acid-free paper

This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer

International Publishing AG part of Springer Nature.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
 Contents

1 Introduction   1

2 Knowledge and Climate  11

3 What Think Tanks Do: Towards a Conceptual Framework  43

4 Heated Debates and Cooler Heads: Think Tanks

and Climate Politics in the United States  65

5 Members Only: Think Tanks and Climate Politics

in Germany 101

6 German and US Think Tanks in Comparison 137

7 Conclusion and Outlook 165

Index 171

v
 List of Figures

Fig. 2.1 European’s attitudes towards climate change. (Source: Special

Eurobarometer Report 313) 26
Fig. 2.2 Global Concern on Climate Change. (Source: Stokes et al.
(2015). “Global Concern about Climate Change, Broad
Support for Limiting Emissions”. PEW Research Center) 27
Fig. 4.1 Donor Think Tank Network (year of reference 2014/$30.000
donation). (Source: conservativetransparency.org, own
calculations)83
Fig. 5.1 Foundation of think tanks in Germany (1949–1989 West
Germany only). (Source: Think Tank Directory, authors’
calculations)106
Fig. 5.2 Network climate research, think tanks, clients. (Source: Own
calculation)113
Fig. 6.1 Another “hockey stick” | Publication of climate denial books in
the US. (Adapted from Dunlap and Jacques 2013: 704) 146

vii
 List of Tables

Table 3.1 Ideal types of |academic and advocacy think tanks 53

Table 3.2 Types of ideas and their effects on policymaking 55
Table 3.3 Typology of knowledge regimes 57
Table 4.1 Membership of Cooler Heads Coalition (X = Membership) 86
Table 5.1 Environmental think tanks in the media, 01/01/2005 to
31/12/2016116
Table 5.2 Environmental think tanks | SNA data 118
Table 5.3 List of think tanks in Germany 120
Table 6.1 Approval rates | Global climate change is a very serious
problem144
Table 6.2 Expanded version types of ideas, effects on policymaking, and
think thank strategies 155
Table 6.3 Civic epistemologies, key features 158

ix
 CHAPTER 1

Introduction

In April 2016 Bill Nye, American TV personality, trusted expert, and self-­
declared “Science Guy”, triggered a small scandal. According to The
Washington Times, Nye had proposed that climate change dissent was made
a criminal, even jailable, offence (Richardson 2016). “Was it appropriate to
jail the guys from Enron?” Nye was quoted as saying, continuing “Was it
appropriate to jail people from the cigarette industry who insisted that this
addictive product was not addictive, and so on?” (Richardson 2016). His
words raise some provocative questions. How should societies respond to
individuals, groups, and industries that query widely held scientific opinions?
Do those who do so deliberately mislead the public? Is it appropriate to com-
pare climate change scepticism and denial with the deliberate and scandalous
deception of stakeholder and regulatory authorities by Enron executives, a
deception that ultimately led to the downfall of that once powerful corpora-
tion and the loss of jobs and pensions of thousands of its employees?
Nye’s comparison of climate denial and cigarette industry campaigns is
perhaps less controversial; both involve the blatant refutation of scientific
evidence. Should, then, the protracted and sophisticated attempts of the
tobacco industry and its imaginative, scrupulous, lobbyists be held legally
accountable for denying the dangers of smoking? When, for instance, the
Tobacco Institute in the early 1970s distributed Smoking and Health: The
Need to Know, a “documentary” which successfully dispelled fears of
­contracting lung cancer from cigarettes (Proctor 2012: 89), should they
have been prosecuted?

© The Author(s) 2018 1

A. Ruser, Climate Politics and the Impact of Think Tanks,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75750-6_1
2 A. RUSER

Likewise, when the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) launched a

costly TV ad campaign entitled “We call it life”, asserting the importance
of carbon dioxide for plant photosynthesis (“We breathe it out, plants
breathe it in”), should it have been considered as engaging in criminal
activity for distracting from the globally held and scientifically robust claim
that carbon dioxide is one of the greenhouse gases driving human-made
global climate change? The timing of the campaign reveals its strategic
nature. The CEI launched “We call it life” at precisely the time the former
US Vice President Al Gore’s film An Inconvenient Truth sounded the
alarm on anthropogenic climate change and drew attention from the
media, policymakers, and the wider public. It comes as no surprise, then,
that the CEI received substantial funding from ExxonMobil and the
American Petroleum Institute (Shakir 2006). Certainly, the experts and
public relation specialists paid for by the CEI didn’t adhere to the stan-
dards of good scientific practice. They weren’t interested in providing or
scrutinizing scientific evidence. But should the denial of scientific facts be
considered a crime? For Nye the answer might seem to be straightforward:
“In these cases, for me, as a taxpayer and voter, the introduction of this
extreme doubt about climate change is affecting my quality of life as a
public citizen. (…) So I can see where people are very concerned about
this, and they’re pursuing criminal investigations” (Richardson 2016).
And his concern is understandable, stemming from the potentially cata-
strophic consequences of inaction and the dangers of climate change for
hundreds of millions of people.
The problem with such a depiction, however appealing it might be to
climate scientists and proponents of a robust global climate change pol-
icy, is that it overlooks the complicated and problematic relations between
expertise and decision-making, and science and politics. The situation
certainly might seem unambiguous: Scientific experts, sounding the
alarm on global climate change, are desperately trying to speak “truth to
power”, but, unfortunately, power seems unwilling or incapable of listen-
ing. The “truth” on anthropogenic climate change is drowned out by
deliberate political misinterpretation of data and facts, alternative theo-
ries that never meet the standards of good scientific practice, and, per-
haps worst of all, false statements, studies, and reports that resemble
scientific research.
But this depiction presupposes a clear-cut conflict between objective
bearers of true knowledge on the one side and a group of interest-driven
distorters or knowledge on the other. In this picture, scientific facts
 INTRODUCTION 3

become politicized if and when they transgress the boundaries between

the aseptic laboratories of scientific research and enter the battlefield of
political ideas, intrigues, and interests. But what if the science itself is con-
tested? Is it always easy to separate healthy and rigorous scientific ques-
tioning from politically motivated distortion? How can one reliably discern
truth from error? How can it be decided which scientific expertise to trust?
And, even more importantly, how might one tell unintentional error form
the intentional misinterpretation of scientific data?
Investigating how think tanks are involved in these processes of trans-
lating or distorting scientific findings is the starting point of this book.
These questions concerned the American public half a century ago,
when Herman Kahn, a staff member of the RAND Corporation and later
a founder of the conservative “Hudson Institute”, published a compre-
hensive monograph titled On Thermonuclear War. (Kahn 1960) The book
was remarkable at the time for including a detailed expert analysis on how
to deviate from the doctrine of mutual assured destruction (MAD) in
order to win a nuclear confrontation. The book was widely discussed and
frequently criticized for bringing the possibilities of nuclear war closer.
When Kahn died in 1983, The New York Times cited in his obituary a criti-
cal Scientific American editorial accusing On Thermonuclear War to be “a
moral tract on mass murder: how to plan it, how to commit it, how to get
away with it, how to justify it” (Treaster 1983).
Kahn’s alarming analysis was widely condemned. According to some of
his numerous critics, his advice could have threatened the lives of vast
numbers of human beings. However, although Herman Kahn was never
sued or publicly shamed for his writings, his controversial advice contrib-
uted to discrediting “megadeath intellectuals”1 (Menand 2005). So,
what’s the difference between his proposals on the use of so-called dooms-
day devices, technologies, that is, that could destroy all human life on
earth, and more recent warnings of the continued use of fossil fuel-based
technology, which might bring equally unpleasant consequences? Was it
that the use of nuclear weapons posed an immediate threat, that the hor-
rors of thermonuclear war threatened the readers of Kahn rather than their
children or grandchildren? Or was it the iconic image of the mushroom
cloud that spurred emotional reaction to Kahn’s cool, distanced, and sci-
entific analysis? The risks of a nuclear war were arguably more tangible
than the risks of a changing climate. Certainly, climate scientists have to
overcome great obstacles when “sounding the alarm” on anthropogenic
climate change. Is this why the “scandal” surrounding Bill Nye failed, in
Visit https://ebookmass.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
4 A. RUSER

the end, to make major headlines and was soon displaced by other news
stories? Distrusting the predictions of some scientists is, in the end, differ-
ent from ignoring the obvious threats of nuclear weapons, or the proven
dangers of smoking. Isn’t it?
One obstacle for climate change policy proponents is that many believe
climate change to be a problem that concerns people “someday in the
future”. While the devastating consequences of atomic bombs were entirely
foreseeable, predicting and pinpointing the impact of climate change are
far more difficult. Unable to “prove” that a single extreme weather event,
such as Hurricane Katrina of 2005 or Hurricane Harvey of 2017, was
caused by climate change, scientists have to turn to probabilities and mod-
els to explain the complex interplay of increasing water temperatures and
atmospheric water vapour and pointing out that ‘the strongest storms will
become more powerful this century’ (Hansen 2009: 253).
Nevertheless, scientists feel they have a moral obligation as a scientist to
inform the wider public of the potential consequences. In 2009, for exam-
ple, renowned climate scientists James Hansen published a book which
aimed at telling “[t]he truth about the coming climate catastrophe and
our last chance to save humanity”. The book’s somewhat sensational sub-
title Storms of My Grandchildren encapsulates its urgent and deeply per-
sonal message. As Hansen explains: ‘I did not want my grandchildren,
someday in the future, to look back and say Opa understood what was
happening, but he did not make it clear’ (2009: XII).
His sentiment of ethical responsibility is one reason for the growing
frustration of the international community of climate scientists, activists,
and commentators such as Bill Nye, with climate sceptics and deniers.
Yet it is no coincidence that the “scandal” took place in the US. As we
will see in the course of this book, climate science is particularly con-
tested in the US where political camps disagree sharply over climate poli-
tics. And while climate science is an international undertaking, driven
mainly by an ­international community of climate scientists and interna-
tional bodies like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, cli-
mate politics and consulting on the issue still take place at a predominantly
national level.
In 2014, the year before the United Nations (UN) Climate Change
Conference in Paris (COP 21), the comprehensive “The GLOBE Climate
Legislation Study” found that despite a general trend towards more ambi-
tious national climate politics, some industrialized countries (most notably,
the US, Australia, and Japan) had taken a step back (e.g. by lowering their
 INTRODUCTION 5

emission reduction targets) in order to stimulate short-term economic

growth (Nachmany et al. 2014). Likewise, despite the attempts of interna-
tional community of scientists to target a global audience, awareness,
acceptance, and attitudes towards climate science differ considerably
between countries. Climate change denial thrives particularly in the US.
This differentiation reveals how climate change is a highly political issue
that requires the commitment of policymakers. The publication of scien-
tific research simply isn’t enough. We know that the Earth’s climate is
changing because scientists, such as James Hansen, have carefully gathered
and analysed data. They have not only discovered changes in global cli-
matic patterns but also attribute these changes to human activity, primarily
the massive increase of carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil
fuels. Yet despite the lack of any real disputes within the community of
climate scientists, the recipients of climate knowledge—policymakers,
journalists, activists, and citizens—still doubt its validity. This situation
might seem particularly puzzling since scientific research isn’t challenged
or contested by other scientists. Since we are said today to live in “knowl-
edge societies” (Stehr 1994)—societies, that is, that are increasingly reli-
ant on (scientific) knowledge—this apparent neglect of a scientific
consensus needs further explanation.
It may well be, in fact, that the answer lies, at least partly within this
depiction of modern societies. As Robert Proctor points out, actively
spreading ignorance, raising doubt, and questioning scientific findings
become a particularly valuable “strategic ploy” in social and political con-
texts used to looking for scientific expertise to plan and/or legitimize
political action (Proctor 2008: 8–9).
Gone are the days when the Machinery of Government Committee
(referred to as “Haldane Commission” after its chairman, the Viscount
Haldane of Cloan) which was tasked with developing guiding principles
for British research policy could state: ‘It appears to us that adequate pro-
vision has not been made in the past for the organised acquisition of facts
and information, and for the systematic application of thought as prelimi-
nary to the settlement of policy and its subsequent administration’ (The
Machinery of Government Committee 1918: 6). This Commission not
only held policymakers accountable for acquiring the best information but
also proposed far-reaching competences for researchers to decide on the
public funding of scientific research. The context of science in society has
changed drastically since then. Scientific expertise can still provide guid-
ance, raise awareness, and offer solutions. But, as will be shown, expertise
6 A. RUSER

is also now regarded as a service, demanded and paid for by policymakers

and interests groups who seek legitimization for their convictions and
preferences.
This becomes particularly evident in climate politics. Controversies
here arise not only between climate change deniers and scientists but
between climate change deniers and climate change “believers”. To believe
in climate change isn’t necessarily the same as to know or to understand
the underlying science. It indicates that people are convinced that climate
scientists ‘got it right’.2 But what convinces people that experts are right,
that scientists actually do speak truth to power?
Communicating science is neither easy nor does it necessarily have to
rest on the best arguments in order to get attention. Individual reputa-
tion, the prestige of a research facility or university, but also personal cha-
risma and rhetorical skills can help determine the success of science
communication. Moreover, it involves much more than simply explaining
the complex implications of scientific discoveries to people outside the
scientific community. Science communication must aim at translating sci-
entific knowledge (e.g. climate knowledge) to audiences who might have
their own (non-scientific) understanding, prefer specific interpretations,
and have a political interest in climate research.
This book will focus on a particularly crucial and interesting type of
research organization, purposefully built to communicate with policymak-
ers and the public: think tanks. It will investigate their respective role in
two selected countries, Germany and the US, and attempt to link to dif-
ferences in national climate politics to distinct ways, opportunities, and
constraints in the distribution of climate knowledge. Focusing on think
tanks promises to augment our understanding of why climate knowledge
is more generally unequally distributed and received. Moreover,
­investigating the roles of think tanks helps understanding how the transla-
tion of (abstract) findings of scientific research into politically “useful”
knowledge is organized.
Investigating the role of think tanks in communicating climate sci-
ence and assessing their impact on climate politics is especially promising
since the rise and global spread of these organizations can be explained
by an increasing demand for scientific advice. The number of think tanks
is rapidly growing around the world. But, as the book shows, think tanks
aren’t necessarily an indicator for an increasing “scientization”, let alone
“rationalization” of the policy cycle. Think tanks can serve a different
purpose. Not only do they provide decision-makers with scientific
 INTRODUCTION 7

knowledge, they are also said to be instrumental in defending political

interests against scientific knowledge claims. In contrast to classical
lobby organizations, think tanks are thus accused of “hijacking” scien-
tific authority: ‘When the Georg C. Marshall Institute began to chal-
lenge the claims of the scientific on the ozone hole and global warming,
they didn’t create their own journal, but they did produce reports with
the trappings of scientific argumentation – graphs, charts, references,
and the like’ write Naomi Oreskes and Eric Conway (2010: 244) outlin-
ing a strategy that is successfully pursued by a number of conservative,
“climate change sceptics” in the US.
However, there are important reasons for why an investigation into
think tanks is also particularly challenging. Not least because despite hav-
ing attracted considerable scholarly attention, what is lacking from think
tank research is an accepted definition of what exactly is the object of
analysis (Weaver 1989: 563). International comparative studies, like the
Global Go To Think Tank Index (https://www.gotothinktank.com)
therefore use a wide definition to trace the “global spread” of these enig-
matic organizations. This book aims at refining the prevailing character-
ization of think tanks. By investigating and comparing their respective role
in the national climate politics of Germany and the US, it will consider the
varieties at an organizational level. Although it focuses on climate politics,
it can provide more widely applicable insights regarding the respective
strategies, clients, and target audiences of think tanks.
In sum, the book intends to contribute to a better understanding of the
role played by think tanks on climate politics in distinct political environ-
ments. The book is therefore divided into a theoretical section (Chaps. 2
and 3) and an empirical section that focuses specifically upon the impact of
think tanks on climate politics (Chaps. 4, 5, and 6).

Structure of the Book

Climate change is scientific term describing the complex interplay of vari-
ous variables affecting local weather, regional and seasonal weather pat-
terns, and, finally, the Earth’s climate. Anthropogenic climate change is a
refinement of the scientific term indicating a major factor of the causation
of global climate change. At the same time (and for this reason) anthropo-
genic climate change has become a political slogan, heavily contested not
so much by scientific peers but by political parties, partisan experts, repre-
sentatives of business interests, and, not least, think tanks.
8 A. RUSER

Chapter 2 therefore discusses the complex relation of climate, knowl-

edge, and politics. Climate change, if taken seriously, demands robust
policymaking. This raises the important question of how exactly science
can inform decision-making and how to safeguard science from being
“politicized” and whether, indeed, this is actually possible. The chapter
describes some of the principles and strategies that allow climate sceptics
to beat climate scientists at their own game: Exploiting the differences
between an everyday understanding and a scientific definition of “cer-
tainty” and “proof” allows partisan experts advocacy think tanks to cast
doubt, influence public opinion, and provide policymaker with “reasoned
arguments” against climate protection.
Chapter 3 outlines the conceptual framework for analysing think tanks,
assessing the effectiveness of their respective strategies, and estimating
their impact on the national climate politics in the United States and
Germany. I argue that differences in the respective political systems have
to be taken into account in order to explain the different roles and strate-
gies of think tanks in the United States and Germany. Moreover, different
“knowledge regimes” explain why think tanks differ at the organizational
level and why, for instance, partisan advocacy think tanks, arguably the
most important type in the US, struggle to getting influence in Germany.
Chapter 4 focuses on think tanks in the United States. The chapter
provides an historical overview of the evolution of think tank in the United
States with a special focus on how think tanks became instrumental in
serving special political interests, including climate politics.
Chapter 5 maps the think tank landscape in Germany highlighting
structural and historical particularities that help explain why academic
research institutions dominate while German think tanks in general stay
more in the background.
Finally, Chap. 6 systematically compares these two cases, analysing the
way in which think tanks “fit in” their respective institutional and political
environment and how they shape public debate and political decision-­
making on climate politics. The chapter shows that the respective knowl-
edge regime influences opportunities for think tanks to accumulate “social
capital” and in consequence affects the strategies that are available to them.
Ultimately, the study shows that understanding the significance and the
consequences of the “global spread of think tanks” (McGann 2016)
requires a comparative approach that doesn’t focus only on the organiza-
tional qualities of think tanks but takes into account the complex institu-
tional context and distinct “political cultures”.
 INTRODUCTION 9

Notes
1. The term “megadeath intellectuals” was coined in the 1960s and refers to
academics who (working at prestigious universities or think tanks such as the
RAND Corporation) were actively involved in producing applicable knowl-
edge to support policies of nuclear deterrence (see Raskin 1963).
2. However, accepting climate science (for whatever reasons) does not
exempt one from making political, that is, normative decisions (see Machin
2013: 11).

References
Hansen, James. 2009. Storms of My Grandchildren. The Truth About the Coming
Climate Catastrophe and Our Last Chance to Save Humanity. London/Berlin/
New York: Bloomsbury.
Kahn, Herman. 1960. On Thermonuclear War. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
Machin, Amanda. 2013. Negotiating Climate Change. Radical Democracy and the
Illusion of Consensus. London/New York: Zed Books.
McGann, James. 2016. 2015 The Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. Think
Tanks and Civil Societies Program, September 2.
Menand, Louis. 2005. Fat Man. The New Yorker, June 27. https://www.newy-
orker.com/magazine/2005/06/27/fat-man. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.
Nachmany, Michal, Samuel Fankhauser, Terry Townshend, Murray Collins,
Tucker Landesman, Adam Matthews, Carolina Pavese, Katharina Rietig, Philip
Schleifer, and Joana Setzer. 2014. The GLOBE Climate Legislation Study: A
Review of Climate Change Legislation in 66 Countries: Fourth Edition. London:
GLOBE International and Grantham Research Institute, LSE.
Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik, Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of
Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming.
New York/Berlin/London: Bloomsbury.
Proctor, Robert N. 2008. Agnotology: A Missing Term to Describe the Cultural
Production of Ignorance (and Its Study). In Agnotology. The Making &
Unmaking of Ignorance, ed. Robert N. Proctor and Londa Schiebinger, 1–36.
Stanford: Stanford University Press.
———. 2012. The History of the Discovery of the Cigarette-Lung Cancer Link:
Evidentiary Traditions, Corporate Denial, Global Toll. Tobacco Control 21:
87–91.
Raskin, Marcus G. 1963. Megadeath Intellectuals. The New York Review of Books,
November 14.
Richardson, Valerie. 2016. Bill Nye, the Science Guy, Is Open to Criminal Charges
and Jail Time for Climate Change Dissenters. The Washington Times, April 14.
10 A. RUSER

Shakir, Faiz. 2006. Big Oil Launches Attack on Al Gore. ThinkProgress, May 17.
https://thinkprogress.org/big-oil-launches-attack-on-al-gore-6f95e972303c.
Accessed 10 July 2017.
Stehr, Nico. 1994. Knowledge Societies. London: SAGE.
The Machinery of Government Committee. 1918. Report of the Machinery of
Government Committee. London: His Majesties Stationery Office.
Treaster, Jospeh B. 1983. Herman Kahn Dies: Futurist and Thinker on Nuclear
Strategy. The New York Times, Obituary, July 8.
Weaver, Kent. 1989. The Changing World of Think Tanks. PS: Political Science
and Politics 22: 563–578.
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
 Philosophy - Exercise Book
Second 2024 - Laboratory

Prepared by: Dr. Jones

Date: August 12, 2025

Introduction 1: Key terms and definitions

Learning Objective 1: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Learning Objective 2: Key terms and definitions
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Learning Objective 3: Historical development and evolution
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 3: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Learning Objective 4: Experimental procedures and results
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Learning Objective 5: Ethical considerations and implications
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 5: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Important: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Key Concept: Literature review and discussion
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
[Figure 7: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Important: Assessment criteria and rubrics
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Practical applications and examples
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 9: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Results 2: Fundamental concepts and principles
Key Concept: Current trends and future directions
• Theoretical framework and methodology
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Literature review and discussion
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Research findings and conclusions
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 13: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 14: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 15: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 15: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Definition: Case studies and real-world applications
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 17: Ethical considerations and implications
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 18: Literature review and discussion
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 19: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 20: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Abstract 3: Key terms and definitions
Remember: Historical development and evolution
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Case studies and real-world applications
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Important: Historical development and evolution
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 26: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Important: Literature review and discussion
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 27: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Key Concept: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Best practices and recommendations
• Statistical analysis and interpretation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 30: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Lesson 4: Case studies and real-world applications
Remember: Experimental procedures and results
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Key Concept: Experimental procedures and results
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Research findings and conclusions
• Theoretical framework and methodology
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Definition: Assessment criteria and rubrics
• Statistical analysis and interpretation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Important: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Remember: Case studies and real-world applications
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 37: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 37: Research findings and conclusions
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Important: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Statistical analysis and interpretation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Section 5: Ethical considerations and implications
Important: Research findings and conclusions
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 41: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Important: Study tips and learning strategies
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 42: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Note: Best practices and recommendations
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Ethical considerations and implications
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Literature review and discussion
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Remember: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Important: Practical applications and examples
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 47: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Practice Problem 47: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 48: Current trends and future directions
• Experimental procedures and results
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Key Concept: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Abstract 6: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
Practice Problem 50: Literature review and discussion
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 51: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 52: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Interdisciplinary approaches
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Practical applications and examples
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 54: Experimental procedures and results
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Practice Problem 55: Research findings and conclusions
• Best practices and recommendations
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Remember: Study tips and learning strategies
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Definition: Practical applications and examples
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Key Concept: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Assessment criteria and rubrics
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Section 7: Best practices and recommendations
Practice Problem 60: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
[Figure 61: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Definition: Critical analysis and evaluation
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Example 62: Research findings and conclusions
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Best practices and recommendations
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Remember: Study tips and learning strategies
• Historical development and evolution
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Note: Key terms and definitions
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Background 8: Experimental procedures and results
Remember: Historical development and evolution
• Theoretical framework and methodology
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 71: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Problem-solving strategies and techniques
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Experimental procedures and results
• Practical applications and examples
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Important: Case studies and real-world applications
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 75: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Important: Experimental procedures and results
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 76: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Remember: Research findings and conclusions
• Learning outcomes and objectives
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Example 79: Historical development and evolution
• Learning outcomes and objectives
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Quiz 9: Theoretical framework and methodology
Key Concept: Practical applications and examples
• Key terms and definitions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Current trends and future directions
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Practice Problem 82: Ethical considerations and implications
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
[Figure 83: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Remember: Literature review and discussion
• Ethical considerations and implications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Remember: Study tips and learning strategies
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Definition: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Case studies and real-world applications
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 86: Assessment criteria and rubrics
• Current trends and future directions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 87: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Example 87: Learning outcomes and objectives
• Critical analysis and evaluation
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Important: Statistical analysis and interpretation
• Interdisciplinary approaches
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 89: Problem-solving strategies and techniques
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Topic 10: Critical analysis and evaluation
Remember: Key terms and definitions
• Fundamental concepts and principles
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 92: Comparative analysis and synthesis
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 93: Fundamental concepts and principles
• Research findings and conclusions
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Note: Theoretical framework and methodology
• Assessment criteria and rubrics
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Definition: Experimental procedures and results
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 96: Case studies and real-world applications
• Comparative analysis and synthesis
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Practice Problem 97: Case studies and real-world applications
• Study tips and learning strategies
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Example 98: Study tips and learning strategies
• Literature review and discussion
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
[Figure 99: Diagram/Chart/Graph]
Note: Best practices and recommendations
• Theoretical framework and methodology
- Sub-point: Additional details and explanations
- Example: Practical application scenario
- Note: Important consideration
Formula: [Mathematical expression or equation]
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge

connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and

personal growth every day!

ebookmass.com