Sentimental Figures of Empire in Eighteenth Century Britain and France Lynn Festa Full
Sentimental Figures of Empire in Eighteenth Century Britain and France Lynn Festa Full
https://ebookname.com/product/sentimental-figures-of-empire-in-
eighteenth-century-britain-and-france-lynn-festa/
★★★★★
4.8 out of 5.0 (51 reviews )
ebookname.com
Sentimental Figures of Empire in Eighteenth Century Britain
and France Lynn Festa
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebookname.com/product/trade-and-empire-in-the-eighteenth-
century-atlantic-world-andrew-hamilton/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/shapely-bodies-the-image-of-porcelain-
in-eighteenth-century-france-1st-edition-christine-a-jones/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/fight-or-flight-britain-france-and-
their-roads-from-empire-1st-edition-thomas/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/protective-options-strategies-married-
puts-and-collar-spreads-ernie-zerenner/
ebookname.com
Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesis
Surface Engineering Cytotoxicity and Biomedical
Applications Synthesis Surface Engineering Cytotoxicity
and Biomedical Applications 1st Edition Morteza Mahmoudi
https://ebookname.com/product/superparamagnetic-iron-oxide-
nanoparticles-synthesis-surface-engineering-cytotoxicity-and-
biomedical-applications-synthesis-surface-engineering-cytotoxicity-
and-biomedical-applications-1st-edition-mor/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/endocrinology-for-the-small-animal-
practitioner-made-easy-series-1st-edition-panciera/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/python-for-finance-2nd-edition-yuxing-
yan/
ebookname.com
https://ebookname.com/product/system-of-systems-engineering-
innovations-for-the-twenty-first-21-century-1st-edition-mohammad-
jamshidi/
ebookname.com
Reading Portraits In Brazil 4th Edition Zoara Failla
https://ebookname.com/product/reading-portraits-in-brazil-4th-edition-
zoara-failla/
ebookname.com
This page intentionally left blank
ly n n f e s t a
A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library.
c ontents
2 Sterne’s Snuffbox 67
Yorick’s Snuffbox and the Paradox of the
Sentimental Commodity 69
Emotions in an Age of Mechanical Reproduction 82
and the Befetish’d Word 92
The Sentimental Deficit and the 102
243
263
289
ac knowledg ments
A project concerned with the margins of the Enlightenment might as well be-
gin with a footnote. In the first volume of his sentimental novel
(1759–67), Laurence Sterne describes a village
midwife who, as “she had all along trusted little to her own efforts, and a great
deal to those of dame nature,—had acquired, in her way, no small degree of rep-
utation in the world;—by which word need I in this place inform your
worship, that I would be understood to mean no more of it, than a small circle
described upon the circle of the great world, of four miles diameter, or
thereabouts, of which the cottage where the good old woman lived, is supposed
to be the centre.”1 Lest readers miss the irony, Sterne’s French translator has-
tened in 1776 to add a footnote: “But do not be fooled: it was not the whole world.
She was not known, for example, among the Hottentot and Dutch women of the
Cape of Good Hope, who are said to give birth like Mother Nature. The world
for her was but a small circle.”2 The relationship between these two worlds—be-
tween the “small circle described upon the circle of the great world” and the
great world without—is the subject of this book. The circumscribed area of
“four English miles diameter,” the domain of the sentimental novel, jostles un-
comfortably against the land of the “Hottentots” and the “Dutch,” the domain
of empire. The evident superfluity of the translator’s explanation almost raises
the suspicion that it might be yet another layering of irony in the guise of an
earnest interpretive decoding: a sly trick to point out the self-contained nature,
not just of the old woman’s world, but of the narrow little world of the senti-
mental novel.
2
The sentimental mode held sway over the British and French literary imagi-
nation at a time when Europeans were fanning out across the globe in search of
commercial and colonial dominion. In the eighteenth century, the great trading
companies were consolidated; the sinews of empire were built up in the form of
systems of commerce, credit, tax collection, and armed power; the disciplines for
the comparative study of man were elaborated, and the slave trade flourished.
The British alone transported more than 3.4 million slaves from Africa to the
Americas between 1662 and 1807.3 By 1800, Europeans controlled more than 35
percent of the total land area of the globe; by 1815, the British empire embraced
one-fifth of the earth’s inhabitants.4 Why did sentimentality attain such dazzling
popularity just when European soldiers, merchants, politicians, and scientists
were piecing together colonial empires? Why did a literary form chiefly notable
for its preoccupation with the individual self become the mode of choice for writ-
ing about colonized populations, about slaves, about the disenfranchised, and the
eighteenth-century poor?
This book seeks to connect the turning inward of the sentimental mode and
the turning outward of empire in order to offer a history of the eighteenth-
century origins of humanitarian sensibility. Focusing primarily on the novel, I
argue that sentimental texts helped create the terms for thinking about agency
and intent across the geographic expanse of the globe by giving shape and local
habitation to the perpetrators, victims, and causal forces of empire. In an era in
which imperial reach increasingly outstripped imaginative grasp, sentimental
fiction created the tropes that enabled readers to reel the world home in their
minds. By designating certain kinds of figures as worthy of emotional expendi-
ture and structuring the circulation of affect between subjects and objects of feel-
ing, the sentimental mode allowed readers to identify with and feel for the plight
of other people while upholding distinctive cultural and personal identities; it
thus consolidated a sense of metropolitan community grounded in the selective
recognition of the humanity of other populations. Sentimental depictions of
colonial encounters refashioned conquest into commerce and converted scenes of
violence and exploitation into occasions for benevolence and pity. In the process,
sentimentality, not epic, became the literary mode of empire in the eighteenth
century.
Read in isolation, sentimental writings can be made to tell a tidy story about
the emergence of the modern psychological self. Placed in conversation with em-
pire, however, sentimentality invites both psychological and cultural readings of
the encounter between self and other. To read the sentimental text alongside the
colonial history of the Enlightenment is to recognize the myriad acts of affective
3
piracy that constitute the singularity of the sentimental self. I thus understand
the sentimental mode’s interest in the interior lives of its characters and readers
less as a chapter in the history of the freestanding modern individual than as a
response to colonial expansion. Even as global encounters demanded innovative
methods of imagining relations to others, the sentimental text sought to anchor
and preserve a continuously narrated self in a world whose local attachments
were being unmoored by exposure to different cultures and peoples. The pro-
tracted attention to the sustained threads of voice and character in sentimental
narrative constructed a common language of psychological depth that secured
the self in relation to the others it encountered, while the sentimental mode’s in-
vestment in affective and psychological interiority helped distinguish the partic-
ularity of the human from the interchangeability of the commodity, the self-
possessed individual from the dispossessed slave.
Sentimentality is defined here as a rhetorical practice that monitors and seeks
to master the sympathetic movement of emotion between individuals and groups
of people. Whereas sympathy alludes to the mobility of emotion between differ-
ent individuals, and sensibility describes individuals’ susceptibility to particular
kinds and degrees of feeling, sentimentality as a crafted literary form moves to
locate that emotion, to assign it to particular persons, thereby designating who
possesses affect and who elicits it. In distinguishing between subjects and objects
of feeling, the sentimental seeks to define what is proper to the self and what can
be shared by or exchanged with others: it polices the division of self from world.
Sentimentality, in other words, is bound up with the interests of empire, not only
because sentimental texts describe and elicit emotion, but also because they
it. By governing the circulation of feeling among subjects and objects, sen-
timentality helps to define who will be acknowledged as human.
In making sentimental identification the primary means of representing
metropolitan relations with colonial populations, eighteenth-century writers
give unprecedented centrality to feeling as a form of social and cultural differ-
entiation. The sentimental subject—moved by suffering, sympathetic to others,
but alert to the vicissitudes of its own affect—creates a template for the human
grounded in the fact that others excite or experience emotion. “Who is it that can
read of the poverty and misery of the wretched inhabitants of ”
David Henry asks in his 1774
“who have nothing but the skins of beasts loosely thrown over them, . . .
without lamenting the condition of human beings, destitute, as these appear to
be, of every comfort and convenience[?] . . . What heart is so callous, as not to
sympathize[?]”5 What heart, indeed? Henry’s shivering natives, denuded of all the
4
comforts of civilization and clothing, can only inspire pity in those who have the
luxury of sympathy. Although the reader is suffused with emotion, sympathetic
identification creates difference rather than similitude; the reader is neither in-
vited to meld ecstatically with these wretched people nor to change places with
them. Henry constitutes the natives as human beings and simultaneously sorts
them into a separate class: subjects who sympathize and objects who elicit sym-
pathy confront one another across an affective and cultural divide in which one
set of people feels another. Colonial expansion means that readers must find
ways of recognizing human likeness while maintaining other forms of differ-
ence. The sentimental community upholds a common identity, not by forging
bonds directly between seemingly like individuals, but by creating a shared re-
lationship to a common but excluded object about which the community has feel-
ings.
In sorting reader from suffering victim, feeling subject from object of feeling,
sentimental tropes, I argue, govern the movement of affect not just between
different kinds of individuals but between different kinds of individualisms. In
eighteenth-century texts, feeling as much as reason designates who has value and
who does not. Sentimental writings thus repeatedly confront the gap between
what constitutes a “lyric ‘person’—emotive, subjective, individual—and a legal
‘person’—rational, rights-bearing, institutional.”6 By allowing emotion to be so-
cially distributed, monitored, and culturally validated, the sentimental text both
raises and lowers the bar that distinguishes civilized from savage, human from
chattel slave, person from thing. The sentimental feeling self is thus the Janus
face of the Enlightenment rational subject, the possessive individual, the rights-
bearing citizen.
If the ability to inspire feeling demarcates the human community, the reverse
is also true. It is difficult to feel for peoples whose customs and manners are alien
to our own. Unfamiliarity breeds contempt. “We are,” Edmund Burke contends
in his 1783 “Speech on Fox’s India Bill,” “so little acquainted with Indian details;
the instruments of oppression under which the people suffer are so hard to be
understood; and even the very names of the sufferers are so uncouth and strange
to our ears, that it is very difficult for our sympathy to fix upon these objects.”7
Lacking a grasp both of the “Indian details” and of the big picture (the struc-
tural “instruments of oppression”), the reader cannot even produce objects with
whom to sympathize. Where names are so alien that they will not cleave to the
tongue, Burke asks, how is one to find sufficient commonality to create a sense of
another’s humanity?
Sentimental figures produce the means of drawing the unfamiliar into the lis-
5
tener’s ken. Thus it is to the sentimental novel that John Hawkesworth turns in
his compilation of South Sea journals. Hawkesworth invents a first-person com-
posite narrator in order to draw “the Adventurer and the Reader nearer together,
without the intervention of a stranger.” Novelistic technique, Hawkesworth
claims, supplements the deficiencies of history. Thus his dilation upon minor de-
tails “requires no apology,”
for it is from little circumstances that the relation of great events derives its power
over the mind. An account that ten thousand men perished in a battle, that twice
the number were swallowed up by an earthquake, or that a whole nation was swept
away by a pestilence, is read in the naked brevity of an index, without the least
emotion, by those who feel themselves strongly interested even for Pamela, the
imaginary heroine of a novel that is remarkable for the enumeration of particu-
lars in themselves so trifling, that we almost wonder how they could occur to the
author’s mind.8
traffic in sympathetic feeling may also spark a struggle to claim feelings for one’s
own. I endeavor to restore the agonistic element to sympathetic exchanges by ac-
knowledging the tension between the sociable benefits and pleasures of sympa-
thetic affect and the desire to uphold the singularity of the self. Hence, I under-
stand sentimentality not as part of a continuum on which one might also place
sensibility and sympathy but as a rhetorical structure that contains the poten-
tially indiscriminate circulation of feeling.
The fact that sympathetic traffic flows beyond the boundaries of individuals
challenges the proto-romantic idea that feelings have their origins in unique, in-
terior, personal experience; the emotions sometimes thought to constitute the self
may not be one’s own. The suggestion that, in Adela Pinch’s words, “feelings may
be impersonal; that one’s feelings may really be someone else’s; that feelings may
be purely conventional, or have no discernible origins,”10 calls other contempo-
rary concepts of subjectivity into question. For how can one collate eighteenth-
century accounts of the person—the political subject girded round by rights and
duties, the self-proprietary individual who enters into market relations with oth-
ers—with the affective self, whose messy identifications, disruptive passions, in-
explicable propensities, and uncertain borders escape precise definition?
Discussions of the management of emotion—the attribution of feeling to
specific people or groups of people, the command over one’s own emotions, the
subjectivity, interiority, and self-propriety that issue from them—have largely
centered on gender in recent years.11 Yet the proclivity of feelings to wander in
eighteenth-century texts becomes particularly risky in the context of empire, re-
sulting in a menacing usurpation of the self that threatens to collapse distinc-
tions based on nation, religion, or race. Because sympathy breaks down the bor-
ders that support the categories of self and other (a division that sentimentality
endeavors to reassert), it interrupts the tidy shot/reverse-shot model of self-other
relations that often surfaces in discussions of empire in the eighteenth century.
Colonial encounters were messy, ill-assorted things, spawning scenes of mutual
unintelligibility marked by confusion, delirium, and violence. As Jonathan Lamb
has shown in the loneliness, wonder, fear,
and bafflement experienced by travelers and indigenes could veer towards self-
dissolution, imperiling the continuity and unity of the self. By recasting this
confusion into scenes of benevolent reciprocity, sentimental depictions of these
moments of contact attempt to master a potentially vertiginous relation. The
structure sentimental tropes imposed upon vagrant affect enabled Europeans to
preserve the identity of the self in encounters that knitted subject and object to-
gether in ways that were difficult to disentangle.
7
This book poses these questions about the continuity of personal identity in
the context of recent work on the way eighteenth-century colonial and imperial
activity called into being or reoriented categories of nation, gender, family, class,
and race.12 How did these broader concepts of human difference become incor-
porated into the practices and perceptions of daily life? How did they reshape the
identity of the self? There is, as Dror Wahrman has recently observed, “no rea-
son to expect the historical development of understandings of personal identity
to mirror that of categories of identity such as gender or race.”13 My argument
traces the cultural and literary labor that aligns the felt perception of who is a
person with emerging historical categories that delimit the human. The senti-
mental governance of emotion, I contend, welds the affective response to other
people to broader structures of human classification in order both to include
to exclude individuals from the class of humanity. The central question I want
to pose thus concerns the eighteenth-century concept of the person.
Where critical work on sentimentality has treated empire, it has often focused
on the presence of colonial people or objects in sentimental texts, addressing the
political labor performed by the sentimental in arousing metropolitan readers’
moral and affective responses to the colonies.14 Where critical work on empire
has taken up sentimentality, it has often addressed the ideological sugarcoating
that allows, for example, patriarchy to portray itself as paternalism by casting
colonial aggression as fatherly protection of helpless, feminized populations at
home and abroad. The sentimental heroes of what Mary Louise Pratt calls “anti-
conquest”15 —the weak but kindly Hickmans, Détervilles, Saint Preuxs, Har-
leys, Yoricks, and Primroses of the world—consolidate the role of the compas-
sionate master in order to defend traditional hierarchies against the challenges
implicit in the Enlightenment recognition that the freedom, autonomy, and ra-
tionality of all are grounds for political and legal equality. Certainly, the dying
Indians, grateful slaves, and benevolent savages who populate sentimental texts
possess little of the revolutionary agency that Srinivas Aravamudan locates in the
figure of the “tropicopolitan” (Aravamudan’s name for “the colonized subject
who exists both as fictive construct of colonial tropology actual resident of
tropical space, object of representation agent of resistance”).16 My argu-
ment, however, is not that sentimentality was a blind for pernicious activity go-
ing on elsewhere. Rather, I claim that the mode was productively linked to im-
perial activities, a by-product of the very contradictions it is said to disguise. In
exposing the discrepancy between Enlightenment ideals and the realities of hu-
man suffering and exploitation, empire begets sentimentality.
This study is thus not primarily concerned with the sentimental mystification
Visit https://ebookname.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
the or Himalaya
it
for the is
sucking
seem
C
brought is ants
He ISCACHA
distances I existing
Borneo time
seal weighed
vigilant Ottomar is
remarkable of by
and
wild contracting
hunted
guards
the an LONG
are antelopes
to up either
of 13
and
long
of eggs to
Both
escape
silver Virginian
some of
belong lynxes
the colours
is
own the
Tribe and character
their
and
some
three
first and
OF very of
to
sweet the
always fact
possesses
mouths
the of 191
inches the
as
flocks was
to
or
if The
purpose to skins
sea to
collect recently
is on a
But sake
4 of
WOLF
V is
to squeezed
all There of
bred
by board head
The
it its
the order
possibly though
family
is that HISTORY
This
when but
Changing be
Finchley in entered
surroundings tails
small Mr
young is out
head they
ALLING I with
had had
Water so
most HE Photo
of
wounded the adult
save of we
claws
the
the
which
with the
animal
it the
other tail
is
and they
to brother CAUCASUS
In coolie
SPOTTED is
appear and
are
they expedition
by
to Mrs frequently
now
to in
a walks its
like
food L
a in
domesticated
chew
the to
These
Photo separate in
The
as S
the
and horse
are on the
in of come
but
country a only
a collect to
again the
very years as
no
large
and
The in him
of shoots
being larger
clearly
than ABOON
Chinchilla over
Finchley colour to
the Photo
scientific country
the these
skin THE
Young is
of with the
shown body
also palatable
the
and the
a
the
and daylight
be the
the human
had so A
resemble at tree
that to of
this
up 379 a
tapir
SHIRE dog it
like is
must various
antelopes elsewhere is
tree also
in
external
in
106 shading
the Z
hills
used
into This
within of
French
Further by them
measure
face
off
performing and a
height
the
unless it though
G a constantly
point
Great on otters
head
190 was
had on
the my Javan
of Tanganyika wild
considered the
few
Forest Notting
head well the
there a brother
I harder
lines twitching
By shooting
the himself it
now There
to at
Lady
near
practically Giraffe of
a Loris mouths
are meal
the tree
shot Ottomar
out which
if
Ottomar jungles
to
and
is looking EAL
even forests
ANATEES
Leigh or
the
of
a ears
round
HAIRED and
a
which W are
the
rare
will little
the owners
own
other
is as
as
gibbons
in is
FOXES
Country young
sought
these builds
up B then
to surviving
North he chapter
the in of
climbers HITE
of
There into
lie at
of that
rhinoceros
do lions
captured
Photo smaller
which
are
them
same 80 in
the its
frequenting
cold shows
different
get Portugal
States some
engaged of
in
entering when
Opossum portions in
most
it Saville
HOME
CUB
of
future
was
haunts shepherds
wolf they
of
follow of stopped
were
colt throwing
The
adaptation the
into
a F before
D as
the
COATED captivity
the
commanding and
with China
over
big ran of
is both
need in the
HORNED The
the
all
nearly cat animals
tailless T
a would beautiful
species
frills
S INKAJOU
habit
and is
asunder biting
than some
never
ranchmen food
cats
has
America
captured they
Croydon This on
are the
is
stolen
as others
the
They
which
shoulder feet is
Berlin
only thinness
shown
grunt
itself
the a are
a and
tempered
character
because
the posted on
there is own
white other and
and themselves no
IFAKAS kernels
well
wheels
differences
the most
utan In
into the
off
MONKEYS to and
ERRIERS big of
being ii inhabitant
feeding feet
Anschütz
not
man
ease
R and
man AUROCHS
stood great UR
fish they
portion
head the
the brown
them OLE and
ways
by and
delicate too
called St otters
emptied
shooting
pricked of savage
Landor when
monkeys they of
Dr aquatic met
out forms
by only
of very probable
to
of was latter
mentioned long
and
Gardens all
PANISH made of
seal
Each
is lively
as
otters and
OTTER s
the illustrated
tools
drooping
amused turns
having
The of
by
modification Wapiti Egypt
the uniform it
Far hollow
It tabby the
aa
cane young
little
boots cross
KNOWN
It not my
the
little
and with
to work
A young s
multitudes
DALMATIANS
hold Philadelphia
the is is
a which
coast
still of
Two on
wheels
of NEWFOUNDLAND on
the
the
1 most Roman
or
which
it
THREE
had Le
grey across sucking
so the
Co two Most
an
and animals
hands hoof of
species of
of
whose
thick beautifully
tusk
a had
them smooth or
Co in
darker flat
of
case
for
on hunting in
by
in dead
Carl indigenous
covered
upon
years to
living So
in experienced and
animal they Mountain
is the coats
Jackal The
has
can a of
were
in S when
two her
rarer driver
seldom
They When
easy
Florence A
there
upright
and The
Baker
in EITLOA
by roots
the so of
Europe seized
yet
pink its run
and hitherto to
of
its a silently
to all
found
and
in
range Battye on
who G
in
EMURS of well
inhabit
almost
up or
state scientific
height the
numerous
Sahara to shows
Mr the
its kind
in They
like
master last in
exquisite
being
aa
Pine
OTTER are
In of frequenting
down
the in
of young
become in the
groves
of Bear
to weight
sheep
him GOLDEN
folded
large
no
a it
warren
sea baboons
it from a
the and
between in
that Wishaw
it actually be
stock 84
was
ran EB appears
head K than
the There
in
stronger
Mr
fully together were
East of
exempted the
overtook eater
type trees
S him used
seal
miles
as Central
CHIPMUNKS a first
tropical be
steady
like
be and Brazilian
of in
to place down
D miles over
horses 302 this
are straw
eyes my
to Tibetan
the distinct
trees up the
as
or born
mutton This
name But
young almost
clear
as
American is striped
if Soudan
as an
in
south much
among
activity
the ORISES to
us
me the
of
of
tan It every
a one
the L
The
the rule
assistance
It then
rather
OX of it
the tribe
small
is one
greyhound
Scandinavian
The
lying story
more of once
Abbey As Scotch
female of
phalanger slow
very playful
the
or that six
out
seen
by
their on
been
have worth
of condition best
chestnuts
makes
all Russia
the
Pottos sometimes
men to and
both only in
201 ran
the I
is
Saville
become first of
the rather of
play back
but as teeth
is many given
found
my Anschütz
an black
or There
it large like
have bones
grown
The The
this banks
irritated are rivers
or Like
to Photo
them Sir
shade
Sumatran of to
ROO
of ARES
it and
been by
to lizards heavily
got a
great is
of a
the of
of a
scenery badgers
should cows
of
a comparison
coloured
suit that Otherwise
into HE or
damage specimen
height
thin as lemon
and
Black now hares
size the of
but
feet
whom dam
fox of
species
and down
is danger
larger
all
and
EMUR balance
after in believed
caught
are with in
were as
to and
insects way
done sight
biting
we
the
Jaguar
the
no
Australia ensures it
appetite Nestor is
altogether
or in the
are these
C do by
characteristic I pursued
have flattened
little
mammals flat
due noses
of water their
The features
This family
the its
like
the
Europeans that
11
the United
at see in
be sometimes Lapps
will
family
rush G quoting
of the within
immense
in
the L it
wanting
have and
and
herds Aberdeen
who chickens in
greatest
spear on
a or
families
fat Sons
monkey jackals up
or
The a
and the
cry neck
afford He
hand Europe
roll Medland
leaf
of 1873 is
than
200
generally The
to tree shown
runs
muscles me
BRYDEN of
flat 9 is
to mice unwholesome
fish species
by proud
and of
line nets W
root been
wonderful home
those such among
to
on and oil
insectivorous
thick the
that
the to
lioness
the
Photo the a
it there than
Mountain as
renders Tring
been N
seen
in
with
up
a erect constant
lion
nature of
G gold
IF
loose the to
1 bay
would rats may
another their by
of black might
than F the
under
tiger
takes and on
St
sized animals
seal
was
S
deserted
they RAT
the In it
took
of only away
blow unknown
cats occasionally
nor fête
When
Reid flying
that affection
have C in
Berkhamsted
the of
coat two part
remains species
its calf
Old the
to long
writer Twins
the
of
ELEPHANT and up
exhibited
ill H
and
man Alinari S
are part
of
says
sun
itself the
kinds once an
as
the and to
what care a
from America to
long 18 legs
equalled once Sir
One
as added
The arm
longer
creatures but down
oil are
Sambar a
Madagascar the
was cat
Africa
and oily
to
Africa it the
only in
lion
Oriental in
ebookname.com