MP3 Assessment v1.0
MP3 Assessment v1.0
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
Document History
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Page 1 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
1. Introduction
This document provides a high level, non-collection specific assessment of the MP3 file format
with regard to preservation risks and the practicalities of preserving data in this format.
This format assessment is one of a series of assessments carried out by the British Library’s
Digital Preservation Team. An explanation of criteria used in this assessment is provided by
the italics below each heading.
1.1 Scope
This document will focus on the MP3 format (also known as MPEG Audio Layer III).
Note that this assessment considers format issues only, and does not explore other factors
essential to a preservation planning exercise, such as collection specific characteristics, that
should always be considered before implementing preservation actions.
MP3 files can be encoded at higher or lower bit rates, with corresponding increases or
decreases in audio quality and file size. For example, audio data encoded as MP3 with a
constant bit rate of 128 kilobits per second would result in a file approximately 9% the size of
the equivalent data in uncompressed CDDA-quality audio [1].
The three classes of audio compression associated with the MPEG-1 and -2 specifications are
known as Layers I, II, and III (MP3 being shorthand for “MPEG Audio Layer III”) [2]. The
difference between the two MPEG specifications, with regard to MP3, was support for an
additional range of bit and sample rates.
There is no "official" file format container associated with the MPEG-1 and -2 audio
compression schemes. As such, many MP3 files simply consist of a raw audio bitstream,
optionally appended or prepended with metadata [3]. The bitstream itself is made up of
frames, each of which consists of a header and a data block, within which segments of the
audio data are encoded [1].
2. Assessment
The history of MP3 dates back to 1987 when the German Fraunhofer Institute began its
research on digital audio broadcasting. In 1988 the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)
was established as a working group of the International Standardisation Organisation (ISO). Its
remit was the development of compressed digital audio and video standards. MP3 was
patented in Germany in 1989 (though not in the U.S. until 1996) with the MPEG-1 standard
being published in 1993, and the backwards compatible MPEG-2 in 1995 [2]. On 12 July 1995,
the Fraunhofer researchers decided to adopt .mp3 as the file format extension, which then
became the acknowledged acronym for ISO standard IS 11172-3, or “MPEG Layer Audio 3”
[4].
Page 2 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
The first time music was distributed in the MP3 format was in 1999 [5]. In 2004, the Fraunhofer
Institute for Integrated Circuits (IIS) and Thomson introduced MP3 Surround, an MP3 upgrade
for “high-quality” 5.1 surround sound [6]. In 2009, following collaboration between Fraunhofer
and Technicolor (formerly Thomson) the mp3HD format was also produced for lossless audio
coding [6]. As of 2013 though, this format appears to have been abandoned [7] and the official
website no longer exists.
In April 2017, Fraunhofer announced that they were terminating the MP3 patent-licensing
program [8] which led to many articles announcing the death of the MP3 [9; 10] but this
announcement simply confirmed that the patents had expired, with a suggestion that users
could move to their other patented formats [11].
Potential alternatives to MP3 include audio codecs like AAC [12], Ogg Vorbis [13], or Opus
[14].
The AAC (Advanced Audio Coding) format, which Apple has popularised via its iTunes
store [15], is able to produce better quality audio than MP3 at lower bitrates, but it is
not as widely supported by players and devices [11]. The format is still covered by
patents.
Vorbis is an open-source codec for the lossy compression of audio [16], offering
similar quality advantages over MP3 as AAC [11]. It is most frequently used with the
Ogg container format and thus is more generally known as Ogg Vorbis.
Opus is a more recently developed lossy open-source audio format designed for real-
time audio transmission over the Internet, though also applicable to storage, and
optimised for efficiently encoding both music and speech [17]. Opus has been
standardised by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) as RFC 6716 [18], and
like Vorbis, can be encapsulated in an Ogg container [19]. While having much to
recommend it over other lossy audio codecs, including those previously mentioned
[17], it currently suffers from relatively poor ecosystem support when compared to
older formats.
MP3 is the most widely supported audio format currently available with everything from mobile
phones, car stereos, and Blu-Ray players having the ability to play the format [13]. It is also the
format of choice for many digital music service providers (with the exception of Apple): both
Amazon’s and Google’s online stores sell their digital music exclusively in the MP3 format [20],
while also utilizing it in their music streaming services [21]. MP3 is also a popular and widely
accepted access format for memory organisations [22] [23].
Corrado and Moulaison [24] state that whilst ubiquitous, MP3 is often not recommended for
digital preservation because it utilises lossy compression that can compromise sound quality
for the sake of file size. In the past, where storage space was an issue, this could have been
seen as an acceptable concession, but with the improvements to lossless audio compression
in formats such as FLAC, MP3 is no longer recommended within the audiovisual archiving
community.
The format is normally accepted by custodial organisations, but usually only when no higher
quality options are available; some examples include:
Page 3 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
At the British Library, reading rooms provide access copies in MP3 format of archived
digital audio. Over 200,000 files are currently available via the Library’s SoundServer
[27], which provides access in the reading rooms to over 100,000 recordings of music,
speech and environments. In the past year, however, the Library has started moving
away from MP3 for access in favour of AAC and its improved audio quality.
1
Binghamton University Libraries offers full support for MP3, although their general
preference for preservation-oriented recorded sound is uncompressed WAV files.
They view MP3 as acceptable for compressed sound especially at data rates of
128 kb/s (mono), 256 kb/s (stereo) or higher.
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) does not consider most
audio files in the MPEG format, including MP3, to have sufficient quality for archival
retention and doesn’t recommend MP3 for the reasons already discussed [28].
The Koninklijke Bibliotheek (KB) have MP3 listed in their 50 most prevalent formats in
2
their e-Depot, narrowly ranking just below WAV in terms of file numbers [29].
Almost any digital audio or multimedia playing software is likely to support MP3 [30], with
suitable playback software often coming preloaded with operating systems, e.g. Windows
Media Player [31] or Apple’s iTunes [15]. There is also an abundance of freeware and open-
source alternatives, e.g. Winamp [32], Foobar2000 [33], VLC media player [34], Zinf [35],
Amarok [36], MPlayer [37], and many others [38].
Issues
Problems with badly formed MP3s can often be traced to problems in frame headers (which
may be incomplete), or in parsing ID3 metadata. Some of these issues can be checked with
tools such as mp3_check [39], which checks for invalid headers or missing frames.
Format identification
MP3 files can be successfully identified by a range of open-source software: Apache Tika [40],
the National Archives’ DROID [41], MediaInfo, and the previously mentioned Xena [42], all
support MP3 identification, alongside other common audio formats.
MP3 Validator (also known as MP3val) is a tool to validate and fix MP3 audio files [45]. It can
be useful for identifying some forms of corruption (e.g. a file which was incompletely
1
Binghamton University Libraries categorise the level of digital preservation support they can
provide. Full support means they will take “all reasonable actions to maintain usability
including migration, emulation, or normalization” and “will ensure access and data fixity”.
2
It is not clear from information on their website whether this number includes access copies
as well as archival copies.
Page 4 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
downloaded). It is, however, only compatible with Windows machines. There is a similar
product available for Mac OS called MP3 Scan+Repair which, as above, claims to validate and
fix damaged files [46].
A third-party MP3 validation module does exist for JHOVE, but is currently unsupported and
requires additional setup [47]. mp3_check should also allow the identification of MP3s which
do not correctly follow the format specification, checking for invalid frame headers and missing
frames [39].
The MP3 standard supports the inclusion of CRC information for frame metadata (such as
headers), but does not cover checking the audio data held in frame data blocks [48], making
them of limited use in detecting audio corruption.
Metadata Extraction
Metadata such as the title, artist, album, track number or other information about the file's
contents appear in a “tag”. Standards available for MP3 do not define a format for tags
alongside the audio data, and there is also no standard container format which would preclude
the need for tags [1]. De facto standards for tag formats for containing metadata do exist,
however, with the most widespread being ID3v1 and 2 [49] [50]. Besides ID3, APE metadata
tags may also be found [51]. Separate from the audio bitstream, these tags can usually be
found attached to the beginning or end of the audio data [1].
There are several tools which allow the addition or modification of metadata tags in MP3s [52]
[53], including Mp3tag (which supports multiple tag formats) and ID3 Tag Editor [54].
There are also a number of tools available for the extraction of metadata from MP3, including
the NLNZ Metadata Extraction tool [55], ExifTool [56], Apache Tika [40], and MP3::Tag [57]. If
present, these tools can extract metadata from title, subject, album, track, year, genre and
comment fields, among others.
The previously mentioned MediaInfo can be used to extract additional technical metadata [43],
as can FFmpeg’s ffprobe utility.
Migration
There are numerous tools and services available, both free and commercial, to convert files to
or from MP3 [58]. Some of these include: FFmpeg [59], VLC media player [34], MPEG321
[60], SoX [61], EZ CD Audio Converter [62], AudioFormat.com [63], iTunes, and the
aforementioned Xena software [42].
If migrating to MP3 for whatever reason, it should be noted that not all encoders will produce
the same quality of sound for a given bitrate, and that the quality can be just as dependent on
the encoder itself.
MP3 is an open standard developed by the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) for the
coding of audio, picture, multimedia and hypermedia information [2].
ISO specifications exist for all the versions of MPEG, and therefore MP3, which were created
during its development. Published in 1993, ISO/IEC 11172-3:1993, Information technology --
Coding of moving pictures and associated audio for digital storage media at up to about 1, 5
Mbit/s -- Part 3: Audio [48] specifies the coded representation of audio for storage media and
describes syntax and semantics for all the three classes of compression methods known as
Layers I, II, and III for MPEG-1 [2]. A technical corrigendum 1 was published in 1996 which
simply added a new table to Annex H – the list of patent holders [64]. In 1998, ISO/IEC 13818-
3 (Second edition, 1998), Information technology -- Coding of moving pictures and associated
audio information -- Part 3: Audio [65] was issued covering the MPEG-2 standard.
Page 5 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
2.5 Complexity
An impression of the complexity of the format with respect to the impact this is likely to have on
the British Library managing or working with content in this format. What level of expertise in
the format is required to have confidence in management and preservation?
As with all compressed audio, MP3 is necessarily more complex than uncompressed formats
like WAV. However, as noted above, there is substantial information on the structure in the
specifications, as well as elsewhere [1] [66], and many tools available which support
manipulation of the format.
MP3 files can contain multiple metadata tag formats, such as ID3 and APE, in a single file, any
of which may hold duplicate or contradictory information. Besides textual metadata such as
album and artist names, these tag formats may also contain embedded image formats,
commonly JPEG or PNG, for album art and various other imagery [67].
ID3 tags support a number of fields which can link to external entities via URLs, such as cover
art imagery or webpages detailing copyright information [67], and like many audio formats,
individual MP3 files can be given an order, or structure, through their inclusion in external cue
sheets [68], or other playlist formats such as M3U [69] and PLS [70].
There are a number of patent claims associated with MP3 though the practical impact of these
claims is not clear [2]. “Many organizations have claimed ownership of patents related to MP3
decoding or encoding. These claims have led to a number of legal threats and actions from a
variety of sources, resulting in uncertainty about which patents must be licensed in order to
create MP3 products without committing patent infringement in countries that allow software
patents” [1].
Licences for commercial use are mentioned on a website from Technicolor though this dates
back to 2009 [71] and also includes a portfolio of patents from the same period [72]. These
parents include P36 21 513 (Audio signal transmission method using a variable masking
threshold), P4034017 (Process for the detecting of errors in the transmission of frequency-
coded digital signals) and twenty others.
On April 23, 2017, Fraunhofer IIS announced the end of Technicolor's MP3 licensing program,
noting that some of the core patents underlying MP3 had expired [73]. In an associated blog,
Fraunhofer clarified that this did not necessarily mean that all MP3 technology would be
immediately available license-free, adding that "apart from the core mp3 patents included in
the licensing program, there might still be some implementation-specific patents (or patents for
other functional enhancements) that have not expired." An earlier assessment commented
that, although it varies from country to country, the final number of outstanding patents for MP3
appears to expire in December 2017 at least in the United States [74].
Fraunhofer IIS's announcement led some to conclude that the MP3 format was now "officially
dead," raising concerns about the format's potential obsolescence [75]. However, the expiry of
the core MP3 patents does not mean that the format will disappear overnight. The large-body
of content currently in MP3 format will continue to exist and will continue to be useable in the
majority of audio playback software. It is possible that the expiration of the core MP3 patents
may encourage the longer-term adoption of newer, more capable standards, e.g. AAC or Opus
Page 6 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
[76]. The Fraunhofer IIS statement itself mentioned the AAC format, for which it still holds the
patents [73]. On the other hand, a MP3 format free of patent restrictions would seem to be a
distinct advantage from a digital preservation perspective. Marco Arment has commented that
"MP3 is supported by everything, everywhere, and is now patent-free" [11]. He adds that for
many of its regular use scenarios, the use of MP3 still makes a lot of sense:
AAC and other newer audio codecs can produce better quality than MP3, but the
difference is only significant at low bitrates. At about 128 kbps or greater, the
differences between MP3 and other codecs are very unlikely to be noticed, so it isn’t
meaningfully better for personal music collections. For new music, get AAC if you
want, but it’s not worth spending any time replacing MP3s you already have.
DRM (Digital Rights Management) on digital audio files is less prevalent than it once was but
may still be an issue with older supplied items from the early 2000s [77] (iTunes for example
used DRM on their files from 2003 to 2009). File properties details will generally indicate the
presence of DRM [78] [79].
Software is available to detect DRM in MP3 (normally as a single feature of an overall software
package). This includes Danuisoft MP3 WAV Converter [80], MP3 WAV Converter [81] or
Aimersoft DRM Media Converter [82].
None known.
Lossy compression
o Not recommended for digital preservation because it utilises lossy compression,
which compromises sound quality for the sake of file size.
o Where storage space is a concern, losslessly compressed formats such as FLAC
should first be considered, followed by more modern lossy formats.
Technology patents
o While patents covering the core technologies have expired, patents around some
of MP3’s less common enhancements may still be in effect, hampering their use.
DRM
o DRM may be present in older files.
External references
o Metadata images and webpages referenced through URLs may be subject to
change or loss.
Page 7 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
significant risk mitigation for the format. Note that these recommendations do not take into
account other requirements such as those driven by specific British Library collections, or non-
preservation issues such as resourcing.
MP3 is not recommended for digital preservation or by the audiovisual archival communities as
an archival format. Storage space concerns on the level at which MP3 would provide a
tangible benefit are now fairly uncommon in modern archival storage systems, and even so,
more modern lossy audio formats may provide less of a compromise in sound quality than
MP3, and at smaller file sizes. Additionally, while MP3 is still widely available, it is now
uncommon for it to be the only procurement option available.
Handling Recommendations
MP3, as with other lossy audio compression, should only be considered when there
are no other options available.
Where storage space issues do exist, losslessly compressed formats, such as FLAC,
should first be considered, followed by more modern lossy formats, such as Opus.
Software Recommendations
There may be value in monitoring validation tools, especially with regard to the use of JHOVE,
but taking into account the monitoring recommendations this need not be a priority.
Monitoring Recommendations
The preservation risks faced by MP3 are unlikely to change rapidly; the format is therefore not
a high-priority for review.
4. References
1. MP3. Wikipedia. [Online] 27 June 2015. [Cited: 29 June 2015.]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3.
2. Library of Congress. MP3 (MPEG Layer III Audio Encoding). Sustainability of Digital
Formats Planning for Library of Congress Collections. [Online] 2 March 2012. [Cited: 30
June 2015.] http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/fdd/fdd000012.shtml.
3. —. MP3 File Format. Sustainability of Digital Formats Planning for Library of Congress
Collections. [Online] 29 June 2010. [Cited: 30 June 2015.]
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/fdd/fdd000105.shtml.
4. Fraunhofer IIS: Happy Birthday MP3! Business Wire. [Online] 12 July 2005. [Cited: 2
September 2015.]
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20050712005686/en/Fraunhofer-IIS-Happy-
Birthday-MP3!#.VdM6lvlVhBc.
5. MP3. Simple Wikipedia. [Online] 27 April 2014. [Cited: 29 June 2015.]
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/MP3.
6. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. The mp3 History. mp3-history.com. [Online] 2015. [Cited:
12 August 2015.] http://www.mp3-history.com/en/the_story_of_mp3.html.
7. mp3HD. Wikipedia. [Online] 30 April 2015. [Cited: 12 August 2015.]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mp3HD.
8. MP3 Overview. Fraunhofer IIS. [Online] 23 April 2017. [Cited: 25 May 2017.]
https://www.iis.fraunhofer.de/en/ff/amm/prod/audiocodec/audiocodecs/mp3.html.
9. Flanagan, Andrew. The MP3 Is Officially Dead, According To Its Creators. NPR Music.
[Online] 11 May 2017. [Cited: 25 May 2017.]
http://www.npr.org/sections/therecord/2017/05/11/527829909/the-mp3-is-officially-dead-
according-to-its-
creators?utm_campaign=storyshare&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social.
10. Crookes, Del. It might be time to say goodbye to the MP3 - so let's look back at its
life. BBC Newsbeat. [Online] 16 May 2017. [Cited: 25 May 2017.]
http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/39934257/it-might-be-time-to-say-goodbye-to-the-
mp3---so-lets-look-back-at-its-life.
11. Arment, Marco. "MP3 is dead" missed the real, much better story. Marco.org. [Online]
15 May 2017. [Cited: 22 May 2017.] https://marco.org/2017/05/15/mp3-isnt-dead.
12. Advanced Audio Coding. Wikipedia. [Online] 30 October 2015. [Cited: 2 November
2015.] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding.
Page 8 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
13. Marshall, Gary. Foxy music: a history of the MP3. Techradar. [Online] 6 January 2010.
[Cited: 13 August 2015.] http://www.techradar.com/news/software/internet/foxy-music-a-
history-of-the-mp3-661549.
14. Opus. Overview. Opus Interactive Audio Codec. [Online] [Cited: 22 May 2017.]
http://opus-codec.org/.
15. Apple. iTunes. Apple. [Online] 2015. [Cited: 29 July 2015.]
https://www.apple.com/uk/itunes/.
16. Xiph.Org. vorbis.com. [Online] [Cited: 22 May 2017.] http://www.vorbis.com/.
17. —. OpusFAQ. [Online] 14 February 2017. [Cited: 22 May 2017.]
https://wiki.xiph.org/OpusFAQ.
18. IETF. RFC 6716: Definition of the Opus Audio Codec. [Online] September 2012. [Cited:
22 May 2017.] https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6716. DOI: 10.17487/RFC6716.
19. —. RFC 7845: Ogg Encapsulation for the Opus Audio Codec. [Online] April 2016. [Cited:
22 May 2017.] https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7845. DOI: 10.17487/RFC7845.
20. Google Music vs Amazon MP3 vs iTunes: Which Online Music Store is the Best for You?
Lifehacker. [Online] 18 November 2011. [Cited: 9 October 2015.]
http://lifehacker.com/5860817/google-music-vs-amazon-mp3-vs-itunes-which-online-
music-store-is-the-best-for-you.
21. Five best streaming music services. Lifehacker. [Online] 10 May 2015. [Cited: 4
November 2015.] http://lifehacker.com/5824193/five-best-streaming-music-services.
22. IASA. Formats and Dissemination Information Packages (DIP). [Online] 2015. [Cited: 5
August 2015.] http://www.iasa-web.org/tc04/formats-and-dissemination-information-
packages-dip.
23. Schüller, Dietrich. Digitisation - The Only Viable Way to Preserve Audio Recordings in
the Long Term. Ibermemoria. [Online] 2004. [Cited: 8 July 2015.]
http://ibermemoria.fonotecanacional.gob.mx/index.php/component/joomdoc/documentos-
de-trabajo/digitalisation-the-only-viable-way-to-preserve/download.
24. Corrado, Edward M. and Moulaison, Heather Lea. File formats and software for
digital preservation. Digital preservation for libraries, archives, and museums. Lanham :
Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.
25. Library of Congress. American Memory help - how to view. Library of Congress -
American Memory. [Online] 2015. [Cited: 13 August 2015.]
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/help/view.html.
26. eCO Acceptable File Types. Copyright.gov. [Online] 2015. [Cited: 5 August 2015.]
http://www.copyright.gov/eco/help-file-types.html.
27. Listening and Viewing Service. British Library. [Online] 2018. [Cited: 18 January 2018.]
http://www.bl.uk/listening.
28. National Archives and Records Administation. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
About Digital Audio and Video Records. National Archives. [Online] 2015. [Cited: 5 August
2015.] http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/initiatives/dav-faq.html.
29. bitsgalore/extensionsKBDM.md. GitHub Gist. [Online] March 2014. [Cited: 28 July
2015.] https://gist.github.com/bitsgalore/21028de28b7f05066585#file-extensionskbdm-
md.
30. Comparison of audio player software. Wikipedia. [Online] 4 August 2015. [Cited: 13
August 2015.] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_audio_player_software.
31. Microsoft. Windows Media Player. Microsoft Windows. [Online] 2015. [Cited: 29 July
2015.] http://windows.microsoft.com/en-GB/windows/windows-media-player.
32. Winamp. Winamp. [Online] 29 January 2014. [Cited: 13 August 2015.]
http://www.winamp.com/.
33. Foobar2000. Foobar2000. [Online] 26 March 2015. [Cited: 29 July 2015.]
http://www.foobar2000.org/.
34. VLC Media Player. VideoLAN. [Online] 30 June 2015. [Cited: 29 July 2015.]
https://videolan.org/vlc/.
35. Zinf. Zinf. [Online] [Cited: 13 August 2015.] http://www.zinf.org/.
36. Amarok. Amarok. [Online] 16 August 2013. [Cited: 13 August 2015.]
https://amarok.kde.org/.
37. MPlayer. MPlayer Project. [Online] 4 July 2015. [Cited: 29 July 2015.]
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/news.html.
38. Marshall, Gary. Best free MP3 software: 10 programs for playing and managing your
music. Techradar. [Online] 12 December 2014. [Cited: 13 August 2015.]
http://www.techradar.com/news/software/applications/best-free-mp3-software-11-
programs-for-playing-and-managing-your-music-1143479.
Page 9 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
Page 10 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
68. Cue sheet (computing). Wikipedia. [Online] 19 August 2017. [Cited: 7 November
2017.] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cue_sheet_(computing).
69. M3U. Wikipedia. [Online] 4 August 2015. [Cited: 20 August 2015.]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3U.
70. PLS (file format). Wikipedia. [Online] 16 May 2015. [Cited: 20 August 2015.]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PLS_(file_format).
71. Technicolor. MP3 Licensing. MP3 Licensing. [Online] 2009. [Cited: 15 October 2015.]
http://www.mp3licensing.com/help/index.html.
72. Patent Portfolio. MP3 Licensing. [Online] 2009. [Cited: 15 October 2015.]
http://www.mp3licensing.com/patents/index.html.
73. Fraunhofer IIS. Alive and Kicking -- mp3 Software, Patents and Licenses. Fraunhofer
Audio Blog. [Online] 18 May 2017. [Cited: 22 May 2017.]
http://www.audioblog.iis.fraunhofer.com/mp3-software-patents-licenses/.
74. A Big List of MP3 Patents (and supposed expiration dates). Tunequest.org. [Online] 26
February 2007. [Cited: 12 August 2015.] http://www.tunequest.org/a-big-list-of-mp3-
patents/20070226/.
75. Jones, Rhett. Developers of the MP3 Have officially killed it. Gizmodo. [Online] 15 May
2017. [Cited: 22 May 2017.] http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2017/05/developers-of-the-mp3-
have-officially-killed-it/.
76. McGath, Gary. MP3 is dead. Long live … what? Mad File Format Science blog. [Online]
15 May 2017. [Cited: 22 May 2017.]
https://madfileformatscience.garymcgath.com/2017/05/15/declare-format-dead/.
77. Warner agrees to use MP3 format. BBC News. [Online] 27 December 2007. [Cited: 5
November 2015.] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7162280.stm.
78. Bartlett, Mitch. Windows 8 & 7: How to Check if a Video or Music File is DRM
Protected. Technipages. [Online] 23 December 2014. [Cited: 15 June 2015.]
http://www.technipages.com/windows-how-to-check-if-a-video-or-music-file-is-drm-
protected.
79. —. iTunes: How to Check Which Songs Are DRM Protected. Technipages. [Online] 31
October 2014. [Cited: 15 June 2015.] http://www.technipages.com/itunes-how-to-tell-
which-songs-are-drm-protected.
80. Danuisoft MP3 WAV Converter 2.3.1.0. Programsbase. [Online] 2013. [Cited: 22 May
2015.] http://daniusoft-mp3-wav-converter.download-14-66521.programsbase.com/.
81. MP3 WAV Converter. DataPicks. [Online] 2008. [Cited: 22 May 2015.] http://mp3-wav-
converter.download-745-9504.datapicks.com/.
82. Aimersoft DRM Media Converter. [Online] Aimersoft, 2015. [Cited: 22 May 2015.]
http://www.aimersoft.com/drm-media-converter.html.
83. Embedding Metadata in MP3s. Creative Commons. [Online] 7 July 2010. [Cited: 15
October 2015.] https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/Embedding_Metadata_in_MP3s.
84. FLAC - Changelog. Xiph.Org Foundation. [Online] 25 November 2014. [Cited: 10
December 2015.] http://xiph.org/flac/changelog.html.
85. FLAC - comparison. https://xiph.org/. [Online] 26 June 2013. [Cited: 10 December
2015.] http://xiph.org/flac/comparison.html.
86. FLAC - format. xiph.org. [Online] 2014. [Cited: 10 January 2015.]
https://xiph.org/flac/format.html.
87. FLAC - documentation. xiph.org. [Online] 2014. [Cited: 10 January 2016.]
http://xiph.org/flac/documentation.html.
88. FLAC - links. https://xiph.org/. [Online] 2014. [Cited: 10 December 2015.]
https://xiph.org/flac/links.
89. FLAC - FAQ. xiph.org. [Online] 2014. [Cited: 11 January 2016.]
https://xiph.org/flac/faq.
90. Vorbis comment. Wikipedia. [Online] 9 November 2015. [Cited: 12 January 2016.]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorbis_comment.
91. VUPlayer. Wikipedia. [Online] 9 December 2012. [Cited: 8 February 2016.]
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/VUPlayer.
92. FlacSquisher. Sourceforge. [Online] 31 March 2015. [Cited: 9 February 2016.]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/flacsquisher/.
93. fre:ac. fre:ac. [Online] 22 November 2015. [Cited: 9 February 2016.]
http://www.freac.org/.
94. Max. sbooth.org. [Online] 29 August 2009. [Cited: 9 February 2016.]
http://sbooth.org/Max/.
95. Kid3 - Audio Tagger. Sourceforge. [Online] 4 February 2016. [Cited: 10 February
2016.] http://kid3.sourceforge.net/.
Page 11 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
Page 12 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
125. Xena (software). Wikipedia. [Online] 13 September 2015. [Cited: 14 January 2016.]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xena_(software).
126. Xena. [Online] 31 July 2013. [Cited: 16 June 2015.]
http://xena.sourceforge.net/index.php.
127. X Lossless Decoder. MacUpdate. [Online] 14 December 2015. [Cited: 6 February
2017.] http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/23430/x-lossless-decoder.
128. Windows 10 to support FLAC audio format. Windows Central. [Online] 25 November
2014. [Cited: 6 February 2017.] http://www.windowscentral.com/windows-10-support-flac-
audio-format.
129. Winamp news. Winamp. [Online] 29 January 2014. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?t=374929.
130. What’s the Difference Between All These Audio Formats, and Which One Should I Use?
Lifehacker. [Online] 18 July 2012. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://lifehacker.com/5927052/whats-the-difference-between-all-these-audio-formats-and-
which-one-should-i-use.
131. What is FLAC? The high-def MP3 explained. CNET. [Online] 27 June 2015. [Cited: 6
February 2017.] http://www.cnet.com/uk/news/what-is-flac-the-high-def-mp3-explained/.
132. Vox. coppertino.com. [Online] 2015. [Cited: 6 February 2017.] https://vox.rocks/mac-
music-player.
133. TIDAL. TIDAL. [Online] 2015. [Cited: 6 February 2017.] http://tidal.com/gb.
134. Tag. MacUpdate. [Online] 26 May 2006. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/21641/tag.
135. Spotify, TIDAL or Deezer - what are the best sounding music services? Digital Spy.
[Online] 3 April 2015. [Cited: 6 February 2017.] http://www.digitalspy.com/tech/home-
audio-and-cinema/feature/a631649/spotify-tidal-or-deezer-what-are-the-best-sounding-
music-services/.
136. QuickTime Components. www.xiph.org. [Online] 14 June 2009. [Cited: 6 February
2017.] https://www.xiph.org/quicktime/.
137. Qobuz. Qobuz. [Online] 2016. [Cited: 6 February 2017.] http://www.qobuz.com/gb-
en/plans/music-streaming-subscription.
138. mp3tag. http://www.mp3tag.de/en/index.html. [Online] 23 December 2015. [Cited: 6
February 2017.] http://www.mp3tag.de/en/index.html.
139. Metadata Extraction Tool. National Library of New Zealand. [Online] [Cited: 6 February
2017.] http://meta-extractor.sourceforge.net/.
140. Metadata. xiph.org. [Online] 24 July 2013. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
https://wiki.xiph.org/Metadata.
141. Media Monkey. Media Monkey. [Online] [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://www.mediamonkey.com/.
142. Live Music Archive. Internet Archive. [Online] [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
https://archive.org/details/etree&tab=collection.
143. Kodi - about. Kodi. [Online] [Cited: 6 February 2017.] http://kodi.tv/about/.
144. How to Find Out the Actual Quality of an Audio File? Gizmo's freeware. [Online] 10 July
2013. [Cited: 6 February 2017.] http://www.techsupportalert.com/How-to-find-out-the-
actual-quality-of-an-audio-file.
145. Free Audio Converter. Freemake.com. [Online] [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://www.freemake.com/free_audio_converter/.
146. foobar2000 - encoder pack. foobar2000. [Online] [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://www.foobar2000.org/encoderpack.
147. Foobar2000. Foobar2000. [Online] [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://www.foobar2000.org/.
148. FLAC to MP3 Converter - How to Convert FLAC to MP3 for Mac and Windows Users?
Faasoft. [Online] 4 September 2014. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://www.faasoft.com/articles/flac-to-mp3.html.
149. Library of Congress. FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec), Version 1.1.2. Sustainability
of Digital Formats. [Online] 21 December 2015. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/formats/fdd/fdd000198.shtml.
150. Knijff, Johan van der. Breaking WAVEs (and some FLACs). Open Preservation
Foundation Blogs. [Online] 4 January 2017. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://openpreservation.org/blog/2017/01/04/breaking-waves-and-some-flacs/.
151. FLAC. Wikipedia. [Online] 31 January 2017. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLAC.
152. FLAC - Features. Xiph.Org Foundation. [Online] 27 November 2014. [Cited: 6 February
2017.] http://xiph.org/flac/features.html.
Page 13 of 14
Digital Date: 06/02/2018
Preservation Assessment:
Preservation
MP3 Format Version: 1.0
Team
153. List of hardware and software that supports FLAC. Wikipedia. [Online] 31 January
2017. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hardware_and_software_that_supports_FLAC.
154. VLC Media Player. VideoLAN. [Online] 30 June 2015. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
https://videolan.org/vlc/.
155. FLAC fingerprint. Etree Wiki. [Online] 28 April 2006. [Cited: 6 February 2017.]
http://wiki.etree.org/?page=FlacFingerprint.
156. MP3. Creative Commons Wiki. [Online] 28 August 2008. [Cited: 6 February 2018.]
https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/MP3.
Page 14 of 14