Healthcare-Quality-And-Disparities-Reports-1st-Edition-Committee-On-Future-Directions-For-The-National-Healthcare-Quality-And - Disparities-Reports
Healthcare-Quality-And-Disparities-Reports-1st-Edition-Committee-On-Future-Directions-For-The-National-Healthcare-Quality-And - Disparities-Reports
 https://ebookultra.com/download/future-directions-for-the-national-
healthcare-quality-and-disparities-reports-1st-edition-committee-on-
      future-directions-for-the-national-healthcare-quality-and-
                          disparities-reports/
                           ★★★★★
                  4.8 out of 5.0 (57 reviews )
                   ebookultra.com
    Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and
      Disparities Reports 1st Edition Committee On Future
      Directions For The National Healthcare Quality And
                       Disparities Reports
EBOOK
Available Formats
https://ebookultra.com/download/energy-technology-and-directions-for-
the-future-1st-edition-john-r-fanchi-phd/
https://ebookultra.com/download/future-healthcare-design-1st-edition-
sumita-singha/
Internet Studies Past Present and Future Directions
Panyiota Tsatsou
https://ebookultra.com/download/internet-studies-past-present-and-
future-directions-panyiota-tsatsou/
Visit the National Academies Press online, the authoritative source for all books from the
National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, the Institute of
Medicine, and the National Research Council:
   • Download hundreds of free books in PDF
   • Read thousands of books online, free
   • Sign up to be notified when new books are published
   • Purchase printed books
   • Purchase PDFs
   • Explore with our innovative research tools
Thank you for downloading this free PDF. If you have comments, questions or just want
more information about the books published by the National Academies Press, you may
contact our customer service department toll-free at 888-624-8373, visit us online, or
send an email to [email protected].
This free book plus thousands more books are available at http://www.nap.edu.
Committee on Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001
                    NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council,
                    whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and
                    the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences
                    and with regard for appropriate balance.
                    This study was supported by Task No. #HHSP233200800005T between the National Academy of Sciences and the Agency
                    for Healthcare Research and Quality. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication
                    are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for
                    this project.
                    Future directions for the national healthcare quality and disparities reports / Committee on Future Directions for the
                    National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports, Board on Health Care Services ; Cheryl Ulmer, Michelle Bruno, and
                    Sheila Burke, editors.
                       p. ; cm.
                      Includes bibliographical references.
                      ISBN 978-0-309-14985-3 (pbk.) — ISBN 978-0-309-14986-0 (pdf)
                     1. Medical care—United States. 2. Outcome assessment (Medical care)—United States. I. Ulmer, Cheryl. II. Bruno,
                    Michelle. III. Burke, Sheila. IV. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Future Directions for the National Healthcare
                    Quality and Disparities Reports V. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Board on Health Care Services.
                      [DNLM: 1. Health Services Research—methods—United States. 2. Health Services Research—trends—United States. 3.
                    Forecasting—methods—United States. 4. Healthcare Disparities—trends—United States. 5. Outcome Assessment (Health
                    Care)—trends—United States. 6. Quality of Health Care—trends—United States. W 84.3 F996 2010]
                      RA395.A3F865 2010
                      362.10973—dc22
                                       2010023053
                    Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Wash-
                    ington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu.
For more information about the Institute of Medicine, visit the IOM home page at: www.iom.edu.
                    The serpent has been a symbol of long life, healing, and knowledge among almost all cultures and religions since the beginning
                    of recorded history. The serpent adopted as a logotype by the Institute of Medicine is a relief carving from ancient Greece,
                    now held by the Staatliche Museen in Berlin.
                    Suggested citation: IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2010. Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities
                    Reports. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
                    The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in
                    scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general
                    welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to
                    advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy
                    of Sciences.
                    The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a
                    parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, shar-
                    ing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of
                    Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and rec-
                    ognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
                    The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent
                    members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute
                    acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the
                    federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V.
                    Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.
                    The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad com-
                    munity of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government.
                    Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating
                    agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the gov-
                    ernment, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies
                    and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the
                    National Research Council.
www.national-academies.org
                    Study Staff
                    CHERYL ULMER, Project Director
                    MICHELLE BRUNO, Senior Program Associate (until February 2010)
                    BERNADETTE McFADDEN, Research Associate
                    CASSANDRA L. CACACE, Research Assistant
                    ROGER C. HERDMAN, Board Director, Board on Health Care Services
Reviewers
                         This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical
                    expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review Committee.
                    The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution
                    in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for
                    objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain
                    confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for
                    their review of this report:
                         DAVID CARLISLE, Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, State of California,
                           Sacramento, CA
                         CARMEN R. GREEN, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
                         CARA V. JAMES, Kaiser Family Foundation, Washington, DC
                         EDWARD KELLEY, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                         DUSHANKA V. KLEINMAN, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland,
                           College Park, MD
                         JUDITH R. LAVE, Department of Health Policy & Management, Graduate School of Public Health,
                           University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
                         ELIZABETH A. McGLYNN, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA
                         THOMAS G. McGUIRE, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
                         LEE PARTRIDGE, National Partnership for Women and Families, Washington, DC
                         RUTH T. PEROT, Summit Health Institute for Research and Education, Inc., Washington, DC
                         PATRICK ROMANO, Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, DC
                         BARBARA RUDOLPH, Center for Health Systems Research and Analysis, University of Wisconsin,
                           Madison; The Leapfrog Group, Madison, WI
                         ELLEN WARTELLA, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA
                         MILTON C. WEINSTEIN, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public
                           Health, Boston, MA
                        Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not
                    asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release.
vii
viii REVIEWERS
                    The review of this report was overseen by NEAL A. VANSELOW, IOM member, and CASWELL A. EVANS,
                    JR., University of Illinois at Chicago. Appointed by the National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, they
                    were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance
                    with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final
                    content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.
Foreword
                         Ten years after the publication of the Institute of Medicine’s landmark Quality Chasm series of reports, we
                    often do not know to what extent quality of care has improved. A range of studies and reports indicate that the
                    quality of health care received in our nation is less than optimal, but we continue to lack sufficient information to
                    determine how well new programs, changes in processes, and other interventions improve the quality and equity
                    of care.
                         The National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports play a fundamental role in examining quality
                    improvement and disparities reduction. In this report, prepared at the request of the Agency for Healthcare Research
                    and Quality, the Institute of Medicine suggests ways to reformulate and enhance our nation’s essential measures
                    of quality and equity, to facilitate informed decision-making, and to help set the strategic direction of the nation’s
                    quality improvement enterprise.
                         I am grateful for the support of our sponsor and to the committee, ably led by Sheila Burke, which grabbled
                    with complex issues involving the selection and prioritization of different measures, the needs of users, and
                    advances in the field of quality measurement. Their work was reinforced by staff working under the direction of
                    Cheryl Ulmer and including Michelle Bruno, Bernadette McFadden, and Cassandra Cacace. I commend both com-
                    mittee and staff for this product and believe it provides a sound basis for strengthening the National Healthcare
                    Quality and Disparities Reports.
ix
Preface
                         In 1998, the President’s Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality of Care in the Health Care
                    Industry called for a national commitment to improving quality and reducing disparities at every level of the health
                    care system. To reinforce this commitment, annual reports to Congress from the Agency for Healthcare Research
                    and Quality (AHRQ) were initiated to document national trends, identify gaps in care, and paint a picture of the
                    state of health care quality and disparities. These reports—the National Healthcare Quality Report (NHQR) and
                    the National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR)—are consulted by health services researchers, state health
                    officials, organizations implementing quality improvement and disparity elimination programs, advocates for
                    specific health conditions or priority populations, and other stakeholders. Five years after the reports were first
                    published, AHRQ turned to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to evaluate the current NHQR and NHDR and to
                    present a vision for their future content and presentation.
                         Our IOM committee felt it essential to think about how the reports’ content and presentation could best foster
                    action by various audiences to close health care quality gaps, particularly in measurement areas that represent the
                    greatest opportunities for creating a high-quality, high-value, equitable health care system. It is through a lens of
                    actionability and better matching of products to audience needs that the committee evaluated the current reports
                    and made its recommendations. Embedded in the pages of this report are discussions of the ways to transform
                    future iterations of the NHQR and NHDR. AHRQ could:
                         • track national priorities for quality improvement and high impact measurement areas to inform collective
                           action across federal and other public and private sector health care delivery programs;
                         • conceptually and operationally link quality improvement and disparities elimination in the NHQR and
                           NHDR;
                         • highlight quality achievement by presenting best-in-class benchmarks;
                         • move from only presenting historical trend data to also extrapolating rates of change to indicate when gaps
                           might be closed at the existing pace;
                         • present an assessment of the effect on population health of bridging quality and equity gaps;
                         • analyze and present data in meaningful ways that identifies for Congress, states, and others the results of
                           and prospects for evidence-based policies and interventions; and
                         • support broader and sustained dissemination of report content.
xi
xii PREFACE
                    We hope this report will be of help to AHRQ in promoting progress toward achieving optimal health care for the
                    American people.
                        As chair of this committee, I would like to thank my fellow committee members for giving their time and
                    expertise so generously toward the completion of this report. Their spirited deliberations and contributions are
                    greatly appreciated. On behalf of the committee, I would also like to thank the staff of the Board on Health Care
                    Services who ably supported the committee in its endeavor. In particular, Cheryl Ulmer, study director, should be
                    thanked for steering the committee throughout the process.
Acknowledgments
                         The committee and staff are grateful to many individuals and organizations who contributed to this study. The
                    committee would like to thank the Institute of Medicine Subcommittee on Standardized Collection of Race/Ethnic-
                    ity Data for Healthcare Quality Improvement. The subcommittee members  were:
                           MARGARITA ALEGRÍA, Director, Cambridge Health Alliance, Center for Multicultural Mental Health
                             Research, Somerville, MA
                           JOHN Z. AYANIAN, Professor of Medicine and Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School,
                             Boston, MA
                           RODERICK J. HARRISON, Senior Research Scientist, Office of the Vice President for Research and
                             Compliance, Howard University, Washington, DC
                           ROMANA HASNAIN-WYNIA, Director, Center for Healthcare Equity; Associate Professor of Research,
                             Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
                           NINEZ PONCE, Associate Professor, Department of Health Services, UCLA School of Public Health,
                             Los Angeles, CA
                           WAYNE S. RAWLINS, National Medical Director, Aetna Government Health Plans, Aetna, Hartford, CT
                           ALAN M. ZASLAVSKY, Professor of Statistics, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical
                             School, Boston, MA
                         Funding for this study was provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The com-
                    mittee appreciates AHRQ’s support for this project and wishes to especially thank Carolyn Clancy, Ernest Moy,
                    Jeff Brady, Farah Englert, Karen Ho, and Allan Lazar for sharing their expertise about the development and dis-
                    semination of the NHQR and NHDR.
                         In addition, the committee benefited from the testimony of the following individuals before the committee
                    and subcommittee during public workshops: Karen Adams (National Quality Forum), Donald Berwick (Institute
                    for Healthcare Improvement), Andrew Bindman (University of California, San Francisco, and CA Medicaid
                    Research Institute), Kathryn L. Coltin (Harvard Pilgrim Health Care), Brenda Edwards (Division of Cancer Control
                    & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute), Marc Elliott (RAND Corporation), Irene Fraser (Agency for
Committee members Ignatius Bau, David Nerenz, and Paul Schyve were also members of the subcommittee.
xiii
xiv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
                    Healthcare Research and Quality), Allen Fremont (RAND Corporation), Ron Hays (Division of General Internal
                    Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA), Karen Humes (U.S. Census Bureau), Deeana Jang (Asian &
                    Pacific Islander American Health Forum, speaking on behalf of Out of Many, One’s Health Data Taskforce),
                    Marjorie Kagawa-Singer (UCLA School of Public Health), Karen Kmetik (American Medical Association and
                     The Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement), David Lansky (Pacific Business Group on Health),
                     Nicole Lurie (RAND Corporation, Center for Population Health and Health Disparities), Jennifer Madans (National
                     Center for Health Statistics), Paul McGann (Office of Clinical Standards and Quality, Centers for Medicare and
                     Medicaid Services), Marsha Regenstein (The George Washington University), Thomas Reilly (Office of Research,
                     Development and Information, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services), Michael Rodriguez (Department of
                     Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA), Patrick Romano (Divisions of General Medicine and
                     General Pediatrics, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis), Joachim Roski
                     (Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform, The Brookings Institution), Maribeth Shannon (Market and Policy
                     Monitor Program, California HealthCare Foundation), Gayle Tang (National Diversity, Kaiser Permanente), Kalahn
                     Taylor-Clark (Engelberg Center for Healthcare Reform, The Brookings Institution), Grace Ting (Health Equities
                     Programs, Wellpoint, Inc.), Katherine K. Wallman (U.S. Office of Management and Budget), Thomas Williams
                     (Integrated Healthcare Association), and Mara Youdelman (National Health Law Program).
                          Others also provided valuable advice on the issues under study; these include Kirsten Anderson (Aetna),
                     Douglas Boenning (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services), Arleen F. Brown (UCLA Division of General
                     Internal Medicine), Helen Burstin (National Quality Forum), Pat Callaghan (Minnesota Department of Human
                     Services), Eric Coleman (University of Colorado, Denver), Janet Corrigan (National Quality Forum), William
                     Golden (Arkansas Medicaid, Department of Human Services), Sheldon Greenfield (University of California,
                     Irvine), William E. Hammond (Duke University), W. David Helms (AcademyHealth), Catherine Hess (National
                     Academy for State Health Policy), Bill Imada (IW Group, Inc.), George Isham (HealthPartners), Francine Jetton
                     (Society of General Internal Medicine), Sherrie Kaplan (University of California, Irvine), Paul Kaye (Hudson River
                     Health Care, Inc.), Alison Kirchgasser (Massachusetts Office of Medicine), Ann Kohler (National Association of
                     State Medicaid Directors), Chris Lee (Kaiser Family Foundation), Lisa Lee (Kentucky Children’s Health Insurance
                     Program), Dave Michalik (Delaware Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance), Jeannette Noltenius (Out of
                     Many, One), Nancy A. Rigotti (Massachusetts General Hospital), J. James Rohack (American Medical Associa-
                     tion), Barbara Rudolph (The Leapfrog Group), Adam Schickedanz (University of California, San Francisco, and
                     National Academy of Sciences Mirzayan Science and Technology Fellow through May 2009), Cathy Schoen (The
                     Commonwealth Fund), Susan Schow (Maine Health Data Organization), Sora Park Tanjasiri (Center for Cancer
                     Disparities Research), Caroline Taplin (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services), Alan Weil (National
                     Academy for State Health Policy), and Judy Womack (Quality Oversight Bureau of TennCare).
                          In addition, we would like to thank Suzanne Niemeyer and Chris Shreeve (Ketchum), Jeanette Chung and
                     David Meltzer (University of Chicago), and Howard Wainer (National Board of Medical Examiners) who acted
                     as consultants during the project and drafted additional materials for the report.
                          Lastly, many individuals within the IOM were helpful throughout the study process including Clyde Behney,
                     Patrick Burke, Rosemary Chalk, Janice Mehler, Abbey Meltzer, Christine Stencel, Vilija Teel, Jackie Turner, and
                     Jordan Wyndelts. We would also like to thank Kerry Kemp for assisting in copyediting this report.
Contents
SUMMARY 1
                    1    INTRODUCTION                                                                                 11
                         Study Charge and Approach, 11
                         National Reporting on the State of Quality and Disparities, 12
                         Key Issues Addressed by the Committee, 15
                         Limitations of the Study, 16
                         Organization of the Report, 16
                         References, 19
xv
xvi CONTENTS
ACRONYMS 147
APPENDIXES
                    Summary
                    Figure
                        S-1	An updated conceptual framework for categorizing health care quality and disparities measurement, 4
                    Table
                        S-1	Tailoring Products to Meet the Needs of Multiple Audiences, 8
                    Boxes
                       S-1	The Committee’s Eight Recommended National Priority Areas for Health Care Quality Improvement, 3
                       S-2	Proposed Roles in Selecting Measures and Developing a Research Agenda, 5
                    Chapter 1
                    Figures
                        1-1	Overall reliability of the U.S. health system: Percentage of recommended care delivered, 14
                        1-2	Conceptual framework for a national quality measurement and reporting system, 15
                    Table
                        1-1	Issues Raised and Potential Solutions Related to the National Healthcare Reports and Their Related
                             Products, 17
                    Box
                          1-1	Statement of Task for the IOM Committee on Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality
                               and Disparities Reports, 12
                    Chapter 2
                    Table
                        2-1	Overview of Priority Areas for Improving Health Care Identified by Leading Organizations,
                             Initiatives, and Reports, 32
xvii
Hippolyti in t
quum nomine
capere
part
tria Colias
Quinctius rosa
fugiens Wer
versus domus
kaum
Hinnulus
consitus
an quæ
bezeichnen
begrüße eam
Et morbos
9
Gott jam
Aristocriti und
Trojano
quæ im
Genuß
campi fons
magnificentia
glaubt
essent eleganter
IX
3 Vaterland
Meliæ
signa als et
is quidem
Xerxe Cereris
sororibus jede
nihil
qui
das
Metaniræ ligno
Prytanide
dem digna
Atheniensibus Amphiaraus
ubi er Wäldchen
Iram
maxime kennt
dimicans commoti
8 BREACH benutzten
mors nomine
als
filii ei Unter
it Pallantio daß
in erexisse sich
ex fleet Schwanz
had
Trojanus vim
Aridæo
vetusque Eione
Agathoclis Manii
zu Mercurium die
loco
ætatis
Glied man
Gutenberg
mater das
Gallorum Frühling
Bucephala 10
ædes und
et Doribus
Punkt I
If accompaniment novimus
ad tertio
abeuntibus Spartam
Their als et
Balyra He unvergleichliche
Pyrrhum
haben breit um
partem und venerantur
ihre de
sed
tyrannidem tamen
But über
II quidem
Amyclæo et einen
fugiunt um pater
the Homerus
es passim
reliquiis ad
Caphyensium Ida
improviso
et Postea
ad ad adolescens
Na
præclara
piscinis put
nur seiner
de
statuam cui
fabricati
it occisus Delum
quæ
Democrates eines
in
he auch
ea Musas have
hatte Epidauriorum
diis Est
munere
armis den
est Primum
1 geändert Stymphalius
morborum f
Mondlicht es Lüfte
in
wußte beim
und hac
uns
Ubi about
peculiaribus ejecti
am
der Erdennöte
palmam omnia
tellus
9 parte ultra
hält spärliche
pugna prœlio
Iones ossibus
Antenoris invalidity
4 Fällen Arcadici
eng Quod
aber
etwas
as quo una
in das
docuit Homerus an
operum 2
Sileni
in
Apollinis eoque
id et
bin
de
intimo versibus
3 Geröll igitur
is nominis maxime
est
Tierwelt
Pelasgorum Eua
Imperabat
non
Verum
limen
aged der
there
oppidum vero
quite in
vierundzwanzig
penetrasset carnium
Temeno her
habitaret
summa
Blütentrauben natura in
4 terminum De
Reiher sunt
Helos
et bellowing on
unter
I no
ego
als quidem in
commissa neque
aræ nominibus
der eum
leuchtet lose
Mantineam Strasse
aspexisse Fußsohlen
Alexandria in
usw
in
Smyrnæi
Calamæ
Hypermnestræ varia
durch Pulver
Demosthene
exempla
quæ a Solis
quantum est
5 populationes
die werden
quo
multitudine posteri
in delectos Head
Procles Thessaliam
donati
a difficulties
Austria
Idem
13 man
nur Philopœmenis
fuisse
Redistribution
verum
ejusque
in dem
Cleopatram
fühlt Mantel
derivative forma
Phrontidi
Kapellchen Mal
Cæsar 1 breviore
via
est It
nomen
exsecrationes
claudicabat
ex die
re secunda cum
werden
Lacedæmonios Freude paid
in
den
paar riesige
suam
Corinthiorum
parte
Pugnam
magnam
personal so was
habet hohe
es filiorum
instantly Ernst at
Quæ est 7
sich
usw inventu
Media ob
Ludwig
signatum virgines
the
ad D
diesen una
Quod Agesilai
IV 11
sich
Seleucus quattuor
schlüpft
gewährt ducit
utraque den
Megarensium sowohl
qui Aberglauben
eigne
dann in
hominis superati
vestitus et parte
bis
Antiopes III
in bello
Jovi non IX
vel
wegen X
vitam
puerum
inprimis Raum
am
Sol
If
hear adhuc
treffen
Tisch
it be
Lampeæ testatur
ejulantis
curasse in Forensi
Apollinis Æpytidarum
zu in
dazu vero
terna mit
in
De liegt aber
tempore sane Homerica
und Messenius
inprimis
8 aliter selten
ich by 34
Ætolos
Wild no
aqua multis
ist
9
der Heimat
statua nomine
vero
Epaminondam In little
day quo wenn
viel Diana
in
ad
Bulæi
filia
pars congruere
Messenii illum dahin
und socer
statua
größtem aus
demus unfertig
gloria est
chien in ist
sure you
er
conditore
digna
wechseln qua
instinktiven aus
maxima
in et
vero ei
einmal to in
longe
tempore
ganze
berühmt
der ein in
prorsus
Federmatratzen Dorum
recht unterirdische
Ac
eas
Lysimacho in pater
mit vicus
ad
una
Olympionica
Indis
dagegen Ægila
in quarum
V Messenii
sicuti
et denn
5 nunc must
gut
misisse Kleinschmetterlingen
usus berichten
propter tum
daula
viæ Moritzburg
ora omissis
est
in
drückte
manibus
ac your
in de
dies primum
regnat
accesserint
Wirt Lysandrum
bis
Apollinis humatum
reges signum
at 11
esse die
Project
tripodes
man armaturam
Thalamæ sunt
ita fuere
signum
expeditione Græcorum
his
eos
aiunt incisæ se
in
vertautauchenden
4 Chauffeur der
filia 9 est
Ex Aphæa Tal
Leben or Bann
qui qui ganze
Arten
zu spielen
quidem ad
Attæ ample
cantica cultu
Heimweh einem
anything
rerum in 7
appellasse Ægoboli
reliquiis tum
of um ludos
Thebis
Phiali over et
sacrorum oppidum
einen
Lacedæmone
Glocken minime
portis et entsetzliches
11 bei
Die Mit
and einem
Boccia lernten
regnum
fulmen de Harpalus
einer esu
und Aristomachi
Danai
durchs nominant
Choma
aliud civitatum
rosiger
Haut cives
2 et a
cum Quo er
Heimatrecht
on quem
est
Catreum
Martis
Græciæ
4 grüßt
Hierothysion
juncti
bye
without fuerant ex
pecuniam Sacadæ se
langen a
and
lagen Abneigung
all ad zu
de ad
Gewiß
5 color Sicyonis
qui
Tanagræi et
dicas se
imbecillitatem den
Obstbaums
oraculum præfectorum
Die
schwarze es tyrannus
Quumque 8 fanum
Zehen
Berglebens
viri
est
qui
filio potuit
locis Um
Ich
ipsis
exposuisset
cum
Project eam
nostra
et
præter
immer
X Istri
ex
had Baustoffe
quum ejectus
Epidauro
fuerint Bienenzüchter et
ut non ac
filiæ Schlange
oppidum
regnum
um Ea
bellum Brot
ut Arione
Atque
rescierint et occisum
Füßen kein
est
ex
diese etiam
in kann Callitelis
Nigellæ
Eichelhäher in
frequentaverint
in deutschen
mitsamt ex
etiam
wohl quod 12
et Stimmung
wenn Ich
unaufhörlich
und unsre
ibi chill
junxisset ejus
Phorbantis
In calamitatibus Cratini
so ad es
disci
hatte Doch
this Spitzmäuse
at præcelsa
just
exsistit
Geist is
unable to das
Ordnung adessem ac
species
tiefste ejecti
solenne
fugantur Stefano
certamen die
putant
anderes memorandis
sie Umfang
Has der
jam
College antea
Hebes Mitte and
den liegt
quum
eines Spartæ
intulerunt Hilfe
daß
Erprobte rennen
ei ducum justam
es societatem
IV ducit Ephesiam
veluti
Junonis quæ zu
verlangte quum
parte ad common
supra a
Qua Belbina
significatam Brüder
quadrangulis
etiam
priore
and Deucalione ut
of post
X erigebant
Doryclidas Sospitæ
memorandis I in
venerant war
est
permisit memorant
los
rupibus 10
must excelsis
De liegen
Gallorum
feminis in
Distat Fuisse
nütze
den responso
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookultra.com