1

Dr. David Bauer, Inductive Bible Study, Session 7,

Auxiliary Structural Relationships, Questions
Resources from NotebookLM
1) Abstract, 2) Audio podcast, 3) Briefing Document, 4) Study Guide, and 5) FAQs

1. Abstract of Bauer, Inductive Bible Study, Session 7, Auxiliary

Structural Relationships, Questions, [Link], BeL
Dr. David Bauer's lecture on Inductive Bible Study focuses on book surveying,
specifically identifying primary and auxiliary structural relationships within biblical texts.
Primary relationships, such as contrast and causation, inherently possess meaning,
unlike auxiliary relationships (interchange, intercalation, chiasm, inclusio), which
enhance primary relationships through structural arrangement. The lecture details how
to identify these relationships, using examples from various biblical books. Finally, it
explains how to formulate definitive, rational, and implicational questions based on
observed structures to aid in interpretation and ultimately synthesize the book's
message.

2. 17 - minute Audio Podcast Created on the basis of

Dr. Bauer, Inductive Bible Study, Session 7 – Double click icon
to play in Windows media player or go to the
[Link] [BeL] Site and click the audio podcast link
there (Introduction & Languages → Introductory Series →
Inductive Bible Study).
 2

3. Briefing Document: Bauer, Inductive Bible Study, Session 7,

Auxiliary Structural Relationships, Questions
Okay, here is a detailed briefing document summarizing the key themes and ideas from
the provided lecture notes by Dr. David Bauer on Inductive Bible Study (IBS), Lecture 7,
focusing on book surveys, primary and auxiliary structural relationships, and interpretive
questions.
Briefing Document: Inductive Bible Study - Lecture 7
I. Introduction: Primary vs. Auxiliary Relationships
• Dr. Bauer introduces the distinction between primary and auxiliary relationships
in biblical texts.
• Primary Relationships: These relationships carry meaning and can stand alone.
They have a sense of connectedness. Examples include contrast, comparison,
similarity, and specificity. "A primary relationship is a relationship that can be
used by itself...The relationship, for example, of contrast involves a sense
connectedness of difference or of comparison, the sense connectedness of
similarity or particularization, the sense connectedness of specificity."
• Auxiliary Relationships: These are structural relationships focused on the
placement and arrangement of material. They don't inherently carry meaning on
their own. They are used to strengthen primary relationships. "Auxiliary
relationships are typically not used by themselves, but in combination with
primary relationships in order to strengthen the primary relationship...they do
not have meaning attached to them."
II. Auxiliary Relationships (with examples):
• Interchange: This involves the alternation or exchange of elements, often blocks
of material, in an A-B, A-B pattern (also called "striped structure").
• Example: The book of Micah alternates between declarations of guilt/punishment
and declarations of restoration. "An example of interchange at the book level
would be interchange in the book of Micah, where you have a constant going
back and forth between blocks of declarations of guilt and punishment and blocks
of declarations regarding restoration of the remnant."
• Purpose: Strengthens contrast and develops specific dimensions of differences.
 3

• Intercalation: The insertion of one literary unit into the midst of another, often
used in narrative.
• Example: Genesis 38 (the story of Judah and Tamar) is intercalated into the
Joseph narrative (Genesis 37-50). "When you have that kind of intercalation, it's a
way for the writer to cause the reader to pause and scratch his or her head and
say, what exactly is the relationship here?"
• Purpose: To cause the reader to pause and reflect on the relationship between
the intercalated story and the surrounding narrative, creating a mutual
illumination between the stories.
• Genesis 38 emphasizes the contrast between Joseph’s righteousness and his
brother Judah's unfaithfulness. "Once you consider what's really going on in
chapter 38 of Genesis, you see exactly how it functions in the Joseph narrative,
that it underscores the contrast between Joseph and his brothers, represented by
his brother Judah here."
• Another Example: 1 Samuel 25 (David and Nabal) intercalated within the narrative
of David's conflict with Saul (1 Samuel 19-26). This interlude highlights the
similarities and contrasts between Saul and Nabal's foolishness and how the Lord
prevented David from sinning through the wisdom of Abigail. "The thing that's
especially emphasized...is that David makes it clear that the Lord has sent Abigail
to him in order to turn David away from bloodguilt."
• Chiasm: The repetition of elements in an inverted order (A-B-B-A or A-B-C-B-A).
• Example: Matthew 19:30-20:16 - The statement "the first will be last, and the last
will be first" frames the parable of the laborers in the vineyard which itself
exhibits chiasm through its presentation of hiring order and payment order. "So
the last will be first, and the first last. Many that are first will be last, first last, and
last first. A, B, B, A."
• Purpose: Emphasizes contrast and highlights a reversal of expectations. In this
specific example, it highlights that God's understanding of justice differs from
human perspectives.
• Inclusio: The repetition of the same word or phrase at the beginning and end of a
unit, creating a bracket effect.
 4

• Example: Psalm 104 begins and ends with "Bless the Lord, O my soul." "Inclusio
involves a repetition of the same word or phrase at the beginning and end of a
unit, really creating a bracket effect."
• Purpose: To indicate the primary concern of the unit, in this case, the constant
blessing of the Lord, and reinforces the relationship between the bracketing
verses and the intervening material by giving both motivation and reasons for
that concern.
III. Major Structural Relationships - Key Considerations
• Control of Material: A major relationship should control more than half of the
book. "A major relationship really, as we mentioned, needs to control the bulk of
the material, more than half the material in the book that is being surveyed."
• Distinctiveness: It should be a meaningful and significant relationship.
• Implicit vs. Explicit: Relationships can be explicit (using words like "but" for
contrast) or implicit (where the relationship is present without specific markers).
• Simple vs. Complex: Simple relationships stand alone, while complex ones
combine two or more relationships. (Example - recurrence of contrast). "A simple
relationship is one relationship used by itself... But we see that sometimes two or
more structural relationships are so bound up together in terms of the way they
function within a book that you cannot describe how one relationship functions
within this book without also talking about another one."
• General vs. Specific: Some relationships are more general and implicit within
more specific ones, so it is best to use the most precise and specific relationship
that is actually observed.
• Conscious vs. Subconscious: Some relationships might be consciously employed
by the writer, others subconsciously, but still deliberately. Many of these
structures are embedded in human thought and communication.
IV. The Importance of Identifying Major Structural Relationships
• Significant Passages/Concepts: Helps identify the most significant passages and
key concepts within the book.
• Relationship of Elements: Shows how different parts of the book relate to each
other.
 5

• Communication of Meaning: Highlights how the writer communicates meaning

through these relationships.
• Specific Interpretation: Aids in the specific and precise interpretation of passages
and the book as a whole.
• Basis for Questions: Provides a framework for asking questions that lead to
deeper understanding.
V. Interpretive Questions (Three Types)
• Definitive Questions: What is the meaning of what is here? (e.g., How are these
two things different?) "The definitive question is essentially what is the meaning
of."
• Rational Questions: Why is this here? What is the purpose or reason behind this?
"The rational question is essentially the why question."
• Implicational Questions: What are the implications of the answers to the
definitive and rational questions? (Assumptions behind the author's claims and
logical outgrowths of those claims). "What are the implications of the answers to
the definitive and rational questions?" "What a passage implies is just as much a
part of its meaning as what it overtly states."
• Example: The implications of Genesis 1:1 (God exists, is distinct from creation, is
free, etc.).
VI. Key Steps in Book Survey:
1. Identify Key Verses/Strategic Areas: Determine which passages best represent
the major structural relationships. They are few in number and limited in scope.
• The key passage is meant to provide insight into the book as a whole.
• Key passages can also suggest a relationship is present that had not been
identified previously.
1. Identify Higher Critical Data: Determine what the text suggests about the author,
recipients, date, and occasion of writing, without relying on secondary sources.
2. Other Major Impressions: Note any other significant features or impressions
about the book.
VII. Conclusion
 6

• Inductive Bible Study emphasizes intentional analysis of structural features.

• A primary purpose of book survey is to prepare for interpretation by identifying
the most important and strategic components of a book, as determined by the
book itself.
This briefing document captures the core ideas presented in Dr. Bauer's lecture,
providing a structured overview for further study and application of inductive Bible
study principles. It highlights the key relationships, analytical steps, and questioning
processes essential for understanding biblical texts.
 7

4. Study Guide: Bauer, Inductive Bible Study, Session 7,

Auxiliary Structural Relationships, Questions
Inductive Bible Study: Lecture 7 Review
Quiz
1. What is the key distinction between primary and auxiliary relationships in biblical
structure? Primary relationships involve a sense of connectedness and meaning,
while auxiliary relationships focus on the arrangement or placement of material
without inherent meaning. Primary relationships can stand alone, but auxiliary
relationships need a primary one to strengthen its meaning.
2. Explain the concept of "interchange" as an auxiliary relationship and provide an
example. Interchange involves an alternation of blocks of material (A-B-A-B) to
emphasize a primary relationship, such as contrast. The book of Micah uses this,
alternating between declarations of guilt and punishment with declarations of the
restoration of the remnant of Israel.
3. How does "intercalation" function as a literary device and what is its purpose?
Intercalation is the insertion of a seemingly unrelated literary unit within a
surrounding narrative to make the reader pause and consider the relationship
between the inserted unit and the surrounding text, so that both can mutually
illuminate each other.
4. Describe the story of Judah and Tamar in Genesis 38, and how it functions as an
intercalation within the Joseph narrative. Genesis 38 tells of Judah's interaction
with Tamar, who is married to his son. She tricks Judah into fathering a child after
his sons fail to fulfill the Levirate law. This intercalation contrasts Joseph's
righteousness with Judah's immorality and shows that God's purposes continue
despite human failure.
5. In 1 Samuel 25, how does the story of David and Nabal relate to the surrounding
narrative of David and Saul? The story of David and Nabal in chapter 25 highlights
the contrast between David’s restraint and Saul’s folly through connections with
the language and themes of the surrounding chapters. This serves to show that
Nabal is a type of Saul.
6. What is a "chiasm" and how does it function in biblical texts? A chiasm is a
literary structure where elements are repeated in an inverted order, such as ABBA
 8

or ABCBA. It functions to emphasize a central point or theme, and can be found

within a whole book as well as within smaller literary units.
7. How does the passage of Matthew 19:30-20:16 exemplify the use of chiasm? In
this passage, the saying "the last will be first, and the first will be last" is stated in
19:30 and again in 20:16. It sandwiches a parable structured chiastically, where
the last hired are paid first, and the first hired are paid last.
8. Explain the literary device of "inclusio" and provide an example from the Psalms.
Inclusio is a repetition of the same word or phrase at the beginning and end of a
literary unit, creating a "bracket effect." For instance, Psalm 104 begins and ends
with the phrase "Bless the Lord, O my soul." This functions to indicate the primary
concern of the unit.
9. What are the three main types of questions that should be asked during the book
survey process? The three types of questions are definitive (what is the meaning
of what's here), rational (why is this here), and implicational (what are the logical
assumptions and outgrowths of the answers to the first two types of questions).
10. What is the significance of identifying "key verses" or "strategic areas" in a book
survey? Key verses, determined by major structural relationships, are passages
that best represent the book's message and provide insights into the book as a
whole. They help focus study and provide a manageable way to approach large or
complex books.
Answer Key
1. Primary relationships involve a sense of connectedness and meaning, while
auxiliary relationships focus on the arrangement or placement of material
without inherent meaning. Primary relationships can stand alone, but auxiliary
relationships need a primary one to strengthen its meaning.
2. Interchange involves an alternation of blocks of material (A-B-A-B) to emphasize a
primary relationship, such as contrast. The book of Micah uses this, alternating
between declarations of guilt and punishment with declarations of the
restoration of the remnant of Israel.
3. Intercalation is the insertion of a seemingly unrelated literary unit within a
surrounding narrative to make the reader pause and consider the relationship
between the inserted unit and the surrounding text, so that both can mutually
illuminate each other.
 9

4. Genesis 38 tells of Judah's interaction with Tamar, who is married to his son. She
tricks Judah into fathering a child after his sons fail to fulfill the Levirate law. This
intercalation contrasts Joseph's righteousness with Judah's immorality and shows
that God's purposes continue despite human failure.
5. The story of David and Nabal in chapter 25 highlights the contrast between
David’s restraint and Saul’s folly through connections with the language and
themes of the surrounding chapters. This serves to show that Nabal is a type of
Saul.
6. A chiasm is a literary structure where elements are repeated in an inverted order,
such as ABBA or ABCBA. It functions to emphasize a central point or theme, and
can be found within a whole book as well as within smaller literary units.
7. In this passage, the saying "the last will be first, and the first will be last" is stated
in 19:30 and again in 20:16. It sandwiches a parable structured chiastically, where
the last hired are paid first, and the first hired are paid last.
8. Inclusio is a repetition of the same word or phrase at the beginning and end of a
literary unit, creating a "bracket effect." For instance, Psalm 104 begins and ends
with the phrase "Bless the Lord, O my soul." This functions to indicate the primary
concern of the unit.
9. The three types of questions are definitive (what is the meaning of what's here),
rational (why is this here), and implicational (what are the logical assumptions
and outgrowths of the answers to the first two types of questions).
10. Key verses, determined by major structural relationships, are passages that best
represent the book's message and provide insights into the book as a whole. They
help focus study and provide a manageable way to approach large or complex
books.

Essay Questions
1. Discuss the role of auxiliary structural relationships in enhancing the
understanding of primary relationships within a biblical text. Use specific
examples from the lecture to support your claims.
2. Analyze how intercalation functions as a unique literary tool in biblical narratives,
exploring its impact on the reader's interpretation and understanding of the text's
overall message.
 10

3. Compare and contrast the functions of chiasm and inclusio as literary devices in
biblical literature, using examples to illustrate their distinct purposes and effects.
4. Evaluate the importance of asking definitive, rational, and implicational questions
during a book survey. Explain how each type of question contributes to a more
thorough understanding of the text.
5. Explain how identifying key verses within a book, determined by the structural
relationships present, can aid in interpreting a passage that is seemingly
unrelated to the overall message or focus of the book.

Glossary of Key Terms

• Primary Relationship: A structural relationship that carries meaning and can be
used alone. Examples include contrast, comparison, and particularization.
• Auxiliary Relationship: A structural relationship that deals with the arrangement
of material and is used to strengthen a primary relationship. It doesn't have
inherent meaning on its own.
• Interchange: An auxiliary relationship where elements are exchanged or
alternated in blocks of material (A-B-A-B pattern) often to highlight a contrast.
• Intercalation: An auxiliary relationship where one literary unit is inserted into the
middle of another, seemingly unrelated literary unit to provide mutual
illumination.
• Chiasm: An auxiliary relationship where elements are repeated in an inverted
order (A-B-B-A or A-B-C-B-A pattern) to emphasize a central point.
• Inclusio: An auxiliary relationship where a word or phrase is repeated at the
beginning and end of a unit, creating a "bracket effect" to emphasize the unit’s
central theme.
• Definitive Question: An interpretive question asking "What is the meaning of
what is here?" This kind of question focuses on establishing the meaning and
content of a text.
• Rational Question: An interpretive question asking "Why is this here?" This type
of question explores the purpose and reason behind an observation or text.
 11

• Implicational Question: An interpretive question that asks, "What are the logical
assumptions and outgrowths of the answers to the definitive and rational
questions?"
• Book Survey: The process of initially examining a book of the Bible, identifying
main units and subunits, structural relationships, key verses, and raising initial
questions for interpretation.
• Key Verses/Strategic Areas: Passages within a book that best represent the major
structural relationships. These are significant passages for understanding the
book as a whole.
• Metacognition: The process of thinking about one's own thinking, such as when
asking questions helps clarify understanding of an observation.
• Higher Critical Data: Information about the author, date, audience, and historical
context of a biblical book, gained through internal evidence in the text itself.
• Explicit Relationship: A structural relationship made clear by words such as "but"
(for contrast) or "therefore" (for causation).
• Implicit Relationship: A structural relationship that is not explicitly stated but is
implied by the way the text is organized and presented.
• Simple Relationship: A structural relationship that is used by itself, without being
combined with other relationships.
• Complex Relationship: A structural relationship where two or more relationships
are so bound up together that you can't describe how one functions without also
describing the other.
• General Relationship: A structural relationship that is implicit in or less specific
than more specific relationships.
• Specific Relationship: A structural relationship that is more precise and helps
readers observe what is actually going on in the text.
• Conscious Relationship: A structural relationship that was used intentionally by a
writer.
• Subconscious Relationship: A structural relationship that was used by a writer,
without conscious intention.
 12

5. FAQs on Bauer, Inductive Bible Study, Session 7, Auxiliary

Structural Relationships, Questions, [Link] (BeL)

FAQ: Understanding Structural Relationships in Biblical Texts

• What is the difference between primary and auxiliary structural relationships in
biblical texts?
• Primary relationships, like contrast, comparison, or causation, inherently convey
meaning and connectedness within the text. They can stand alone or be
combined. Auxiliary relationships, such as interchange, intercalation, chiasm, and
inclusio, primarily deal with the arrangement or placement of material. They are
typically used in combination with primary relationships to strengthen or
emphasize those primary relationships and their associated meanings, adding
layers of complexity and understanding.
• How does "interchange" function as an auxiliary relationship, and can you give
an example?
• Interchange involves the alternation or exchange of different blocks of material,
often in an A-B, A-B pattern (sometimes referred to as "striped structure"). This
technique is used to emphasize the relationship between the alternating
elements, often strengthening a primary relationship such as contrast. The book
of Micah provides a clear example, alternating between declarations of guilt and
punishment (A) and declarations of restoration of the remnant (B). This pattern
underscores the sharp contrast between Israel's wrongdoing and God's gracious
plan for restoration.
• What is "intercalation," and what is its purpose within a narrative?
• Intercalation is the insertion of one literary unit into the middle of another. It
often appears as an interruption or digression in a narrative. The inserted unit
might seem disconnected at first, but it actually serves to mutually illuminate the
surrounding narrative. The intercalation encourages readers to pause and
consider how the inserted story relates to and sheds light on the larger narrative.
The story of Judah and Tamar in Genesis 38, which is inserted into the Joseph
narrative (Genesis 37-50), exemplifies this, by drawing a contrast between the
immoral behavior of Judah and the integrity of Joseph, and by showing how the
covenant line was continued through different means.
 13

• How does a "chiasm" contribute to the meaning of a text, and where can it be
found?
• A chiasm involves the repetition of elements in an inverted order, often following
an A-B-B'-A' pattern or an A-B-C-B'-A' pattern. Chiasm often works to create an
emphasis or highlight a central theme. While it can be seen in smaller passages,
the repetition of material is also found in whole books. Matthew 19:30 and 20:16,
along with the intervening parable of the laborers, illustrate chiasm's function in
emphasizing the reversal of expectations in God's justice, with the last being first
and the first being last.
• What is "inclusio" and how does it highlight the central theme of a literary unit?
• Inclusio involves the repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning and end of a
literary unit, creating a bracket effect. This repetition often signals the central
concern or theme of the entire unit. In Psalm 104, the repeated phrase "Bless the
Lord, O my soul" in verses 1 and 35 brackets the psalm, setting the primary
concern. The intervening material (verses 2-34) then substantiates and provides
the reasons or causes for this blessing, emphasizing the importance of a life
dedicated to blessing God.
• What are the three types of interpretive questions that can be asked regarding
structural relationships?
• There are three main types of interpretive questions: Definitive questions (What
is here? What is the meaning of what is here?), which explore the specific
meaning of the observed relationships. Rational questions (Why is this here?
What is the purpose or reason?) delve into the writer's motivation or purpose for
using a particular structural relationship. Implicational questions (What are the
implications of the answers to the definitive and rational questions?) explore both
the logical assumptions that lie behind the writer's communication and the
necessary logical outgrowths of his claims and how those theological implications
relate to the passage.
 14

• Why is identifying key verses or strategic areas within a book important, and
how are they determined?
• Key verses or strategic areas are crucial for understanding the essence of a book.
They represent the major structural relationships, offering insights into the book's
themes and arguments. These key passages are not chosen based on personal
preference, but are determined by examining which passages best represent each
major structural relationship in the book. For example, a pivot passage is a key
passage in texts that are structured by cruciality. This allows for a focused study of
the book's most significant parts and acts as a guide to where to spend
interpretive time and also helps in the overall synthesis of the message of the
book.
• What does it mean to identify "higher critical data" when surveying a book and
why is it important?
• Identifying "higher critical data" involves examining a book for clues about its
author, date, audience, place of writing, and the historical circumstances that
gave rise to it. This data is found directly within the text of the book rather than
outside resources. This step allows the reader to develop an initial understanding
of the book's background and context based on what is explicitly in the text. This
textual awareness can then be used to evaluate secondary sources and scholarly
claims, helping to create more informed judgements and interpretations of the
book.