100% found this document useful (4 votes)
16 views167 pages

Antibody Drug Conjugates 1st Edition L. Nathan Tumey Online Version

Complete syllabus material: Antibody Drug Conjugates 1st Edition L. Nathan TumeyAvailable now. Covers essential areas of study with clarity, detail, and educational integrity.

Uploaded by

emineamm5855
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (4 votes)
16 views167 pages

Antibody Drug Conjugates 1st Edition L. Nathan Tumey Online Version

Complete syllabus material: Antibody Drug Conjugates 1st Edition L. Nathan TumeyAvailable now. Covers essential areas of study with clarity, detail, and educational integrity.

Uploaded by

emineamm5855
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 167

Antibody Drug Conjugates 1st Edition L.

Nathan Tumey
download

https://ebookgate.com/product/antibody-drug-conjugates-1st-edition-
l-nathan-tumey/

★★★★★
4.6 out of 5.0 (79 reviews )

Get Your PDF Now

ebookgate.com
Antibody Drug Conjugates 1st Edition L. Nathan Tumey

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library


Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) available
Download now and explore formats that suit you...

Antibody Drug Conjugates 1st Edition Ingrid Sassoon

https://ebookgate.com/product/antibody-drug-conjugates-1st-edition-
ingrid-sassoon/

ebookgate.com

Antibody Drug Conjugates Fundamentals Drug Development and


Clinical Outcomes to Target Cancer 1st Edition Kenneth J.
Olivier Jr.
https://ebookgate.com/product/antibody-drug-conjugates-fundamentals-
drug-development-and-clinical-outcomes-to-target-cancer-1st-edition-
kenneth-j-olivier-jr/
ebookgate.com

Antibody Methods and Protocols 1st Edition Hilmar


Ebersbach

https://ebookgate.com/product/antibody-methods-and-protocols-1st-
edition-hilmar-ebersbach/

ebookgate.com

Metabolite Safety in Drug Development 1st Edition Suzanne


L. Iverson

https://ebookgate.com/product/metabolite-safety-in-drug-
development-1st-edition-suzanne-l-iverson/

ebookgate.com
Antibody Phage Display Methods and Protocols 2nd Edition
Beatrix Kotlan

https://ebookgate.com/product/antibody-phage-display-methods-and-
protocols-2nd-edition-beatrix-kotlan/

ebookgate.com

Intermediate Statistical Investigations 1st Edition Nathan


Tintle

https://ebookgate.com/product/intermediate-statistical-
investigations-1st-edition-nathan-tintle/

ebookgate.com

Beverage Industry Microfiltration 1st Edition Nathan


Starbard

https://ebookgate.com/product/beverage-industry-microfiltration-1st-
edition-nathan-starbard/

ebookgate.com

Kinetics of Enzyme Action Essential Principles for Drug


Hunters 1st Edition Ross L. Stein

https://ebookgate.com/product/kinetics-of-enzyme-action-essential-
principles-for-drug-hunters-1st-edition-ross-l-stein/

ebookgate.com

Beginning ActionScript 2 0 1st Edition Nathan Derksen

https://ebookgate.com/product/beginning-actionscript-2-0-1st-edition-
nathan-derksen/

ebookgate.com
METHODS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Series Editor
John M. Walker
School of Life and Medical Sciences
University of Hertfordshire
Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK

For further volumes:


http://www.springer.com/series/7651
For over 35 years, biological scientists have come to rely on the research protocols and
methodologies in the critically acclaimed Methods in Molecular Biology series. The series was
the first to introduce the step-by-step protocols approach that has become the standard in all
biomedical protocol publishing. Each protocol is provided in readily-reproducible step-by-
step fashion, opening with an introductory overview, a list of the materials and reagents
needed to complete the experiment, and followed by a detailed procedure that is supported
with a helpful notes section offering tips and tricks of the trade as well as troubleshooting
advice. These hallmark features were introduced by series editor Dr. John Walker and
constitute the key ingredient in each and every volume of the Methods in Molecular Biology
series. Tested and trusted, comprehensive and reliable, all protocols from the series are
indexed in PubMed.
Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Methods and Protocols

Edited by

L. Nathan Tumey
Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA
Editor
L. Nathan Tumey
Department of Pharmacy
and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Binghamton University
Binghamton, NY, USA

ISSN 1064-3745 ISSN 1940-6029 (electronic)


Methods in Molecular Biology
ISBN 978-1-4939-9928-6 ISBN 978-1-4939-9929-3 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9929-3

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020


This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is
concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction
on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation,
computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply,
even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations
and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to
be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty,
express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This Humana imprint is published by the registered company Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer
Nature.
The registered company address is: 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, U.S.A.
Preface

The design, preparation, and bioanalysis of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have become
progressively more sophisticated over the past decade. Thanks to the persistence of a handful
of research groups, ADCs are now viewed as a proven therapeutic modality for the targeted
delivery of chemotherapeutic agents. From the outside, the technology is deceptively
simple. A targeting antibody delivers a covalently attached payload to a cell type of interest,
wherein the molecule is internalized and lysosomally processed and the payload is released.
However, a quick look “under the hood” reveals that the failure rate of ADC discovery
programs is not so different than small molecule discovery efforts and that there remain a
tremendous number of unknown variables when designing these therapeutic agents. As
such, the diversity of ADC technology has exploded over the past 10 years in trying and
addressing the shortcomings in first-generation ADCs. ADCs in clinical and preclinical
development now employ a dizzying array of technology that spans multiple types of
antibody backbones, over a dozen varieties of payload classes, various cleavable and
non-cleavable linker chemistries, and numerous conjugation technologies. For the bench-
top scientists charged with evaluating and advancing these research programs, the technical
hurdles can seem overwhelming. This book has been designed keeping these scientists in
mind. We have pulled together a team of authors who are lab-based scientists who have
performed many of the key conjugations, bioanalyses, and in vitro assays for the ADCs that
are now in advanced preclinical and clinical evaluation. The goal of this book is not to
provide an exhaustive list of procedures, but rather to highlight some of the key methodol-
ogies that are commonly employed across multiple ADC programs. It is our hope that this
book will help to lower the “activation barrier” that is often present when entering a new
discipline and will provide a “toolbox” of sorts for the next generation of aspiring ADC
scientists who will, no doubt, advance the field into new and exciting therapeutic arenas.

Binghamton, NY, USA L. Nathan Tumey

v
Contents

Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
Contributors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
1 An Overview of the Current ADC Discovery Landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
L. Nathan Tumey
2 Pushing the Envelope: Advancement of ADCs Outside of Oncology . . . . . . . . . . 23
Michael J. McPherson and Adrian D. Hobson
3 Conjugations to Endogenous Cysteine Residues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Durgesh V. Nadkarni
4 Site-Specific Conjugation to Cys-Engineered THIOMAB™ Antibodies . . . . . . . 51
Pragya Adhikari, Neelie Zacharias, Rachana Ohri,
and Jack Sadowsky
5 Transglutaminase-Mediated Conjugations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Yasuaki Anami and Kyoji Tsuchikama
6 Click Chemistry Conjugations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Tak Ian Chio and Susan L. Bane
7 Utilizing Solid-Phase to Enable High-Throughput, Site-Specific
Conjugation and Dual-Labeled Antibody and Fab Conjugates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
Sujiet Puthenveetil
8 Bridged Cysteine Conjugations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113
Matthew Bird, Joao Nunes, and Mark Frigerio
9 Antibody Conjugations via Glycosyl Remodeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Hanna Toftevall, Helén Nyhlén, Fredrik Olsson,
and Jonathan Sjögren
10 ADC Analysis by Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147
Ryan Fleming
11 Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography Coupled to High-Resolution
Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of ADCs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
Soraya Chapel, Florent Rouvière, Morgan Sarrut,
and Sabine Heinisch
12 Drug Loading and Distribution of ADCs After Reduction
or IdeS Digestion and Reduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187
Elsa Wagner-Rousset, Olivier Colas, Yannis-Nicolas François,
Sabine Heinisch, Davy Guillarme, Sarah Cianférani, and Alain Beck
13 Analysis of ADCs by Native Mass Spectrometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197
Oscar Hernandez-Alba, Anthony Ehkirch, Alain Beck,
and Sarah Cianférani
14 High-Resolution Characterization of ADCs by Orbitrap LCMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
Jintang He, Surinder Kaur, and Keyang Xu
15 Conjugation Site Analysis by MS/MS Protein Sequencing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221
Linjie Han, Yanqun Zhao, and Qunying Zhang

vii
viii Contents

16 Conjugation Site Analysis of Lysine-Conjugated ADCs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235


Hua Sang, Ning Wan, Gaoyuan Lu, Yang Tian, Guangji Wang,
and Hui Ye
17 Characterization of ADCs by Capillary Electrophoresis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251
Wenjing Ning and Yanqun Zhao
18 Characterization of the Primary Structure of Cysteine-Linked
Antibody-Drug Conjugates Using Capillary Electrophoresis with
Mass Spectrometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263
Josiane Saadé, Rabah Gahoual, Alain Beck, Emmanuelle Leize-Wagner,
and Yannis-Nicolas François
19 Purification of ADCs by Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography . . . . . . . . . . 273
Calvin L. Becker, Robert J. Duffy, Jorge Gandarilla,
and Steven M. Richter
20 Detection and Removal of Small Molecule and Endotoxin
Contaminants in ADC Preparations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291
Jeffrey Casavant, Anokha S. Ratnayake, Sujiet Puthenveetil,
and L. Nathan Tumey
21 Physical Stability Studies of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs)
Under Stressed Conditions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301
Yilma T. Adem
22 Biophysical Methods for Characterization of Antibody-Drug Conjugates . . . . . . 313
Vamsi Krishna Mudhivarthi and Jianxin Guo
23 Determination of ADC Cytotoxicity in Immortalized Human Cell Lines . . . . . . 329
Shengjia Wu and Dhaval K. Shah
24 LC/MS Methods for Studying Lysosomal ADC Catabolism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341
Andrew J. Bessire and Chakrapani Subramanyam
25 Assessing ADC Plasma Stability by LC-MS Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353
Cong Wei
26 Determination of ADC Concentration by Ligand-Binding Assays. . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
Hsuan-Ping Chang and Dhaval K. Shah

Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
Contributors

YILMA T. ADEM  Pharmaceutical Development Department, Genentech (A Member of the


Roche Group), South San Francisco, CA, USA
PRAGYA ADHIKARI  Department of Protein Chemistry, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco,
CA, USA
YASUAKI ANAMI  Texas Therapeutics Institute, The Brown Foundation Institute of Molecular
Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
SUSAN L. BANE  Department of Chemistry, Binghamton University, State University of New
York, Binghamton, NY, USA
ALAIN BECK  Pierre Fabre Laboratories, IRPF—Centre d’Immunologie Pierre-Fabre
(CIPF), Saint-Julien-en-Genevois, France
CALVIN L. BECKER  Abbvie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA
ANDREW J. BESSIRE  Medicine Design, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Groton, CT, USA
MATTHEW BIRD  Abzena Ltd., Cambridge, UK
JEFFREY CASAVANT  Pfizer, Inc., Groton, CT, USA
HSUAN-PING CHANG  Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and
Pharmaceutical Sciences, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo,
NY, USA
SORAYA CHAPEL  Institut des Sciences Analytiques, CNRS, UMR 5280, Université de Lyon,
Villeurbanne, France
TAK IAN CHIO  Department of Chemistry, Binghamton University, State University of New
York, Binghamton, NY, USA
SARAH CIANFÉRANI  Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse Bio-Organique (LSMBO),
IPHC, UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France
OLIVIER COLAS  Pierre Fabre Laboratories, IRPF—Centre d’Immunologie Pierre-Fabre
(CIPF), Saint-Julien-en-Genevois, France
ROBERT J. DUFFY  Abbvie Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA
ANTHONY EHKIRCH  Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse Bio-Organique (LSMBO),
IPHC, UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France
RYAN FLEMING  Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, Biologic Therapeutics,
AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
YANNIS-NICOLAS FRANÇOIS  Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse des Interactions et des
Systèmes (LSMIS), UMR 7140 (Unistra-CNRS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg,
France
MARK FRIGERIO  Abzena Ltd., Cambridge, UK
RABAH GAHOUAL  Laboratoire Vecteurs Pour l’Imagerie Moléculaire et le Ciblage
Thérapeutique (VICT), Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
JORGE GANDARILLA  Abbvie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA
DAVY GUILLARME  School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva,
Switzerland; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
JIANXIN GUO  Pharmaceutical R&D, Pfizer, Inc., Chesterfield, MO, USA
LINJIE HAN  Process Analytical Chemistry, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA
JINTANG HE  Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA

ix
Visit https://ebookgate.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
x Contributors

SABINE HEINISCH  Institut des Sciences Analytiques, CNRS, UMR 5280, Université de Lyon,
Villeurbanne, France
OSCAR HERNANDEZ-ALBA  Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse Bio-Organique (LSMBO),
IPHC, UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Strasbourg, France
ADRIAN D. HOBSON  Abbvie Global Biologics, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Worcester, MA,
USA
SURINDER KAUR  Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
EMMANUELLE LEIZE-WAGNER  Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse des Interactions et des
Systèmes (LSMIS), UMR 7140 (Unistra-CNRS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg,
France
GAOYUAN LU  School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu,
People’s Republic of China
MICHAEL J. MCPHERSON  Abbvie Global Biologics, AbbVie Bioresearch Center, Worcester,
MA, USA
VAMSI KRISHNA MUDHIVARTHI  Pharmaceutical R&D, Pfizer, Inc., Chesterfield, MO, USA
DURGESH V. NADKARNI  Pfizer Inc., Chesterfield, MO, USA
WENJING NING  Process Analytical Chemistry, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA
JOAO NUNES  Abzena Ltd., Cambridge, UK
HELÉN NYHLÉN  Genovis AB, Lund, Sweden
RACHANA OHRI  Department of Protein Chemistry, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco,
CA, USA
FREDRIK OLSSON  Genovis AB, Lund, Sweden
SUJIET PUTHENVEETIL  AbbVie Bioresearch Center, R&D, Worcester, MA, USA; Pfizer, Inc.,
Groton, CT, USA
ANOKHA S. RATNAYAKE  Pfizer, Inc., Groton, CT, USA
STEVEN M. RICHTER  Abbvie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA
FLORENT ROUVIÈRE  Institut des Sciences Analytiques, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne,
France
JOSIANE SAADÉ  Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse des Interactions et des Systèmes
(LSMIS), UMR 7140 (Unistra-CNRS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
JACK SADOWSKY  Department of Protein Chemistry, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco,
CA, USA
HUA SANG  Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong,
Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and
Pharmacokinetics, State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical
University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
MORGAN SARRUT  Institut des Sciences Analytiques, Université de Lyon, Villeurbanne,
France
DHAVAL K. SHAH  Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and
Pharmaceutical Sciences, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo,
NY, USA
JONATHAN SJÖGREN  Genovis AB, Lund, Sweden
CHAKRAPANI SUBRAMANYAM  Medicine Design, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Groton, CT, USA
YANG TIAN  School of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu,
People’s Republic of China
HANNA TOFTEVALL  Genovis AB, Lund, Sweden
Contributors xi

KYOJI TSUCHIKAMA  Texas Therapeutics Institute, The Brown Foundation Institute of


Molecular Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston,
TX, USA
L. NATHAN TUMEY  Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton
University, Binghamton, NY, USA; Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT, USA
ELSA WAGNER-ROUSSET  Pierre Fabre Laboratories, IRPF—Centre d’Immunologie Pierre-
Fabre (CIPF), Saint-Julien-en-Genevois, France
NING WAN  Key Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, State Key
Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu,
People’s Republic of China
GUANGJI WANG  Key Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, State Key
Laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu,
People’s Republic of China
CONG WEI  Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Biogen Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
SHENGJIA WU  Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and
Pharmaceutical Sciences, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo, Buffalo,
NY, USA
KEYANG XU  Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
HUI YE  Key Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, State Key Laboratory of
Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People’s
Republic of China
NEELIE ZACHARIAS  Department of Protein Chemistry, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco,
CA, USA
QUNYING ZHANG  Process Analytical Chemistry, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA
YANQUN ZHAO  Process Analytical Chemistry, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA
Chapter 1

An Overview of the Current ADC Discovery Landscape


L. Nathan Tumey

Abstract
The prototypical ADC mechanism involving antigen-mediated uptake and lysosomal release is both
elegantly simple and scientifically compelling. However, recent clinical-stage failures have prompted a
reevaluation of this delivery paradigm and have resulted in an array of new technologies that have the
potential to improve the safety and efficacy of up and coming programs. These innovations can generally be
categorized into seven areas that will be elaborated on in this chapter: (1) Exploiting new payload
mechanisms; (2) Increasing the drug–antibody ratio (DAR); (3) Increasing the antibody penetration;
(4) Overcoming ADC resistance mechanisms; (5) Increasing the efficiency of ADC uptake and processing;
(6) Mitigating off-target payload exposure; and (7) Employment of noncytotoxic payloads. It is our belief
that these seven areas capture the current “landscape” of innovations that are taking place in the design of
next-generation ADCs. Together, these advancements are reshaping the ADC field and providing a path
forward in the face of the recent clinical setbacks.

Key words ADC, Resistance, Toxicity, Conjugation, DAR, Tumor penetration, Payload

1 Introduction

Drug discovery is not for the faint of heart. As anyone who has
spent time in the field knows, promising therapeutic agents in late-
stage trials can essentially disappear at a moment’s notice after a
disastrous clinical report; and drugs that seemed destined for
obscurity can suddenly become major blockbusters. For good or
for bad, the field of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) has proven
to be a microcosm of the broader drug-discovery engine. The past
10 years of ADC discovery has seen incredible scientific innovation
coupled with massive clinical failures and unexpected successes. The
goal of this chapter is to highlight some of the changes in the field
in recent years and to offer a “snapshot” of the most promising
innovations that are currently being explored.
Typical ADCs consist of three key components: An antibody
targeting vehicle, a cytotoxic drug, and a covalent linker that con-
nects the system together. Upon binding to the receptor on the
target cell, the ADC is internalized via a clathrin-mediated

L. Nathan Tumey (ed.), Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 2078,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9929-3_1, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

1
2 L. Nathan Tumey

Fig. 1 Prototypical ADC uptake mechanism

endocytosis and trafficked to the lysosome. Lysosomal proteolysis


cleaves the covalent linkage between the antibody and payload, thus
allowing the payload to escape the lysosome and bind to its intra-
cellular target (Fig. 1). The antibody is designed to target antigens
that are uniquely expressed on the tissue of interest, typically cancer
cells. Great effort is typically employed to ensure that the selected
antigen has minimal expression in normal tissue, especially in highly
perfused tissue. The linker is carefully selected to be rapidly cleaved
in the lysosome while having minimal cleavage during its extended
time in circulation (often 2 weeks or more) [1]. Linker design is
also critically important in determining propensity for aggregation
and the rate of premature linker cleavage in plasma [1, 2]. The ADC
payload must be exquisitely potent due to the limited number of
receptor interactions that are possible at a given time. Note that
unlike passive diffusion, the rate of drug entry into the cell is easily
saturated once all receptors have been engaged with an antibody
partner. Thus, it is typically believed that only low-nM intracellular
concentrations of active drug can be realized using ADC technol-
ogy. Once the payload is released from the antibody (depending on
its physical properties) it has the potential to freely diffuse through
the cell membrane and affect nearby non-antigen expressing cells
thus inducing the so-called bystander activity.
The above description represents the idealized scenario and
deliberately neglects to mention many of the key “unknowns” in
the field where innovation is most ripe. For the sake of organizing
our discussion, we will categorize recent technological innovations
into seven areas: (1) Exploiting new payload mechanisms;
An Overview of the Current ADC Discovery Landscape 3

(2) Increasing the drug–antibody ratio (DAR); (3) Increasing the


antibody penetration; (4) Overcoming ADC resistance mechan-
isms; (5) Increasing the efficiency of ADC uptake and processing;
(6) Mitigating off-target payload exposure; and (7) Employment of
noncytotoxic payloads. These areas of innovations are by no means
exhaustive and certainly we will not address every technologically
interesting advancement that has been reported in recent years.
However, it is our belief that these seven areas capture the current
“landscape” of innovations that are taking place in the design of
next-generation ADCs.

2 Exploiting New Payload Mechanisms

A full discussion of the breadth of cytotoxic payloads employed in


ADCs is beyond the scope of this chapter and has been reviewed
elsewhere [3]. However, it is worth noting that many of these new
classes of payloads are mechanistically related to the present cohort
of clinically validated payloads. For example, the clinical success of
auristatin and maytansinoid payloads (tubulin-binding agents) has
prompted enormous efforts to identify alternative structural classes
of molecules that exploit this mechanism. This has resulted in the
advancement of tubulysin [4–6], eribulin [7], cryptophycin [8],
and cemadotin [9] ADCs, in addition to new structural variants
of auristatin [10–12] and maytansinoid payloads [13, 14]. Likewise,
the clinical success of calicheamycin ADCs has inspired a new
generation of DNA-damaging payloads including uncialamycin
[15], pyrrolo[2,1-c] [1, 4] benzodiazepines (PBDs) [16–18], and
duocarmycins [19, 20]. While these payloads continue to advance
through preclinical and clinical development, recent high-profile
failures of multiple ultra-potent DNA damaging ADCs [21, 22]
have prompted considerable interest in alternative anti-proliferative
mechanisms.
Building on the success of tubulin-binding agents, a team from
Beyer reported a series of ADCs that block the activity of kinesin
spindle protein (KSP), an ATP-dependent microtubule motor that
is involved in the separation of centrosomes during mitosis
[23]. Interestingly, in spite of the presence of an obvious amine
handle for linker conjugation, these payloads were initially attached
by a noncleavable linker to a maleimide conjugation handle.
(ADC1) Conjugation via endogenous cysteine residues resulted
in DAR3-4 ADCs that exhibited sub-nM potency against antigen
expressing cell lines. While not explicitly stated, a design theme for
this series of ADCs seems to be the delivery of an impermeable
payload that minimizes bystander activity while maximizing intra-
cellular payload concentration. As such, a cleavable ADC (ADC2)
was designed to release a highly polar zwiterionic lysine-adduct, as
shown in Fig. 2. Indeed, the released species for these ADCs were
4 L. Nathan Tumey

H2 N O

HN

O O
H H
HO2C N N
N N S
F H
N O O
O

O N O H O H
N O N NH ADC2
F N N
H S N
HO O N O
NH2 NH2
O F
O
O O
ADC1
HO
O
F O H O H
N H
N
NH
O HN
H O O
O O O N N N O
O OH
H H N S O N
O O H H O
N HO H
H N
O N N
ADC3 ADC4 O H H
O
O NH2

F O NH2
O O
H
O N N
H O N N S
O
N N N O
H N N O
N N S H

ADC5 O O ADC6

H2N O

HN

SO3H O O
H H
N CO2H N N
N N (CH2)5 N
H S
N O O O
O N O O
HN
N O
N S
ADC7

Fig. 2 Recently disclosed payload classes for use in ADCs

shown to be minimally effective in a cytotoxicity assay in spite of


their impressive efficacy as conjugates. Interestingly, both ADCs
appear to be designed to release an amino-acid linked payload that
is perhaps a substrate of an amino acid transporter that has been
speculated to be an important mechanism of lysosomal escape [24].
In 2016, a team from Pfizer reported generating ADCs that
deliver a potent RNA splicing inhibitor known as thialanstatin A
(also known as spliceostatin) [25]. Unlike auristatins and maytan-
sinoids, these compounds do not have a readily available amine or
thiol handle that is suitable for conjugation. Instead, a carboxylic
acid on the payload was directly attached to lysine residues of the
antibody by a “linker-less” NHS-ester-mediated conjugation.
(ADC3) Similar to early-generation auristatin ADCs, the loading
was found to significantly impact the efficacy. The optimal efficacy
was observed with an ADC with a DAR of 3.2. Both high-loaded
(DAR 4.2) and low-loaded (DAR 2.2) ADCs were less efficacious.
Interestingly, a later report showed that the hinge-cysteine conju-
gated thialanstatin A resulted in quite weak in vivo efficacy. Thus, in
An Overview of the Current ADC Discovery Landscape 5

order to retain the lysine-based conjugation method, a site-specific


method that employed multivalent peptidic linkers was reported
[26]. In short, a small lysine-containing peptide was allowed to
react with the NHS-activated thialanstatin and subsequently
“clicked” into place using a site-specific azide handle. The resulting
homogeneous DAR4 thialanstatin conjugates exhibited efficacy in a
Her2 model at doses as low as 1.5 mg/kg. Interestingly, while prior
reports of site-specific conjugation methods typically focus on sta-
bility and metabolism issues [27], this report shows that site of
conjugation can play a significant role in in vitro cytotoxicity.
Presumably this is due to site-dependent lysosomal catabolism,
similar to the mechanism reported by Bessire [28].
Continuing with the theme of blocking RNA processing, a
number of reports have emerged describing inhibitors of RNA
polymerase, the key enzyme responsible for the formation of
mRNA. The centrality of this mechanism for all biological processes
suggests that RNA polymerase inhibitors will have toxicity across
both proliferating and quiescent cells. The most well-studied of the
RNA polymerase inhibitors are toxins derived from the Amanita
genus of mushrooms, known collectively as amatoxins. An early
amatoxin linked to an anti-EpCAM antibody exhibited efficacy in a
pancreatic cancer line following a 2 mg/kg dose, but exhibited
severe toxicity at doses of 6 mg/kg and higher [29]. Building on
this work, a number of patents have now been filed on amanatin-
based ADCs, such as the one shown in Fig. 2 [30–32] (ADC4).
While amanatin ADCs (like their small-molecule payloads) have
been known to exhibit severe toxicity, a serendipitous observation
reported in 2015 may render a path forward for this class of
molecules. A well-known tumor suppressor gene known as TP53
is frequently found to be deleted in human tumors, thus leading to
uncontrolled cell growth. A key subunit of RNA polymerase,
known as POLR2A, is a genetic neighbor of TP53, and is fre-
quently downregulated in hemizygous TP53 deletions, thus ren-
dering the cells hypersensitive to RNA polymerase inhibitors
[33]. Thus, amatoxin-ADCs may be particularly useful in TP53-
downregulated tumors.
In a move away from mitotic and transcriptional inhibitors,
teams from Novartis and Seattle Genetics simultaneously disclosed
ADCs designed to block cellular metabolism by inhibiting the
formation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)
[34, 35]. The ADCs, shown in Fig. 2 (ADC4 and ADC5), deliver
potent inhibitors of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase
(NAMPT), a critical enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of
NAD+. Unlike some of the aforementioned mechanisms, inhibitors
of NAMPT were demonstrated to be cytotoxic irrespective of the
mitotic state of the cells. Perhaps most importantly, a null-targeted
version of ADC5 was shown to be well tolerated in rats at doses of
up to 100 mg/kg—well above the dose that is typically tolerated by
6 L. Nathan Tumey

DNA-damaging and tubulin-binding ADCs. Efficacy was reported


in a variety of tumor xenograft models at doses of 10–20 mg/kg.
Rather than directly blocking an essential metabolic pathway, a
recent report demonstrates an interesting approach to sensitize cells
to apoptosis by inhibiting an anti-apoptotic protein known as
Bcl-xL. While the specific details have not yet been published, the
team from AbbVie has reported a series of ADCs, exemplified by
ADC7, which enhance the activity of docetaxel at doses of
3–10 mg/kg [36, 37]. Importantly, these ADCs do not appear to
result in thrombocytopenia, a common side effect of Bcl-xL inhibi-
tors that have been evaluated in the clinic. Given the immense
progress in our understanding of cell signaling in recent years,
agents that induce apoptosis and autophagy are certain to become
more widely explored as ADC payloads.

2.1 Increasing the Based on the classical ADC mechanism outlined in Fig. 1, it is clear
Drug–Antibody Ratio that the intracellular drug concentration will be related to the
(DAR) number of receptors that are able to engage with an ADC. Low
numbers of receptors will naturally result in low cellular uptake. In
order to compensate for this, a classical approach has been to
increase the drug–antibody ratio (DAR) in order to maximize the
number of drugs that are delivered per binding event. This can
naturally lead to examples of the so-called super-stoichiometric
activity, wherein a modest increase in drug loading can lead to a
dramatic increase in biological activity. One example of this can be
seen in the 2011 report from Zhao in which an increase in the
loading of a maytansinoid conjugate by 2.5-fold led to an increase
in the in vitro ADC activity by approximately 50-fold [38]. An even
more dramatic example can be seen in the aforementioned thailan-
statin ADCs in which increasing the loading of an anti-Her2 con-
jugate from ~1.6 to 4.5 increased the in vitro cytotoxicity against a
moderate-expresser (MDA-MB-361-DYT2) by approximately
2500-fold. These examples illustrate the benefits of increasing the
drug loading [25].
However, based on the seminal work of Hamblett [39], it has
long been known that increasing the drug loading often has an
adverse effect on pharmacokinetic exposure. For this reason, the
vast majority of clinical-stage ADCs has employed ADCs with DAR
values of ~2-4. However, the past 5 years has seen a dramatic shift in
this paradigm due to advances in our understanding about how
biophysical properties of ADCs impact their PK. Hydrophobicity
has been found to be a key driver of these findings. A fascinating
example of this was reported in 2015 by Lyon. In this study, the
authors incorporated a glycolytic-release chemistry and a PEG
chain within the linker (ADC8) in order to “mask” the hydropho-
bicity of the MMAE payload (Fig. 3) [10]. In doing so, they were
able to develop a DAR8 ADC that had equivalent pharmacokinetics
to the naked antibody. This has now become a common strategy
An Overview of the Current ADC Discovery Landscape 7

O O O O O
O
m n q
OH OH OH O OH O

O O

O O S
O NH O N O
24 H H
O MMAE NH O N
O N

O O
H O O
N
O N S ADC9
HN O
O N N O O O H
H H N
O O HO
HO
OH
O
HO OH O
ADC8
N O
OH H
H N

N
HO

Fig. 3 Strategies for increasing the DAR of ADCs by maximizing the polarity of the linker (ADC8) and by
incorporating polymeric linkers (ADC9)

and DAR8 intra-chain cysteine ADCs are now routinely used


provided that the linker-payload is sufficiently polar to prevent
accelerated clearance [35, 40, 41]. Additionally, a variety of chemi-
cal strategies have been used to incorporate polar functional groups
into the linker with the explicit goal of decreasing the hydropho-
bicity of the ADC. This includes the incorporation of phosphates
[42, 43], sulfates [38], tertiary amines [44], and quaternary
amines [6].
While it is now commonly known that polar functionality in the
linker can “mask” the hydrophobicity of a payload, it is less com-
monly known that the site of conjugation can have a dramatic
impact on ADC hydrophobicity. Several recent studies have
recently demonstrated that carefully chosen sites of conjugation
can allow for the attachment of very hydrophobic payloads with
minimal impact on hydrophobicity, as measured by HIC [27, 45,
46]. Using these sites, conjugates with DAR as high as eight has
been achieved with a minimal impact on PK [46]. It should be
noted that these sites have the potential to be useful locations for
the attachment of dendrimeric or polymeric linkers, as described
below.
Using the polar linker technology described above, a maximal
DAR of 8 can be achieved using endogenous cysteine residues.
However, an alternative strategy has been developed in which a
dendrimeric or polymeric linker is used in order to increase the
loading far beyond eight. Interestingly, this strategy was first
reported back in 1991—long before the current cohort of clinical
ADCs had been developed [47]. More recently, a team from Mer-
sana has developed a poly-1-hydroxylmethylethylene hyrdoxy-
methylformal (PHF) linker that can be tuned for various levels of
Visit https://ebookgate.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
filled

the

creatures grass

often somewhat

confined more some

in

in and water

rosette vi EMIGALES

are L
S

the a

Exquisite

at birds

tame was used

lakes

make numerous

bitten but of
from stick

they their

lions

This

a great
used there than

the the the

TELLER and

bank When

the great the

animal
were of

had set its

Ratel

the The

URICATES the

the was

ill tempted too


Balmacron Bennett state

specimens

very the round

hard between by

William
crest and

limbs

far

become made feet

of whether this
said

slew HOWLER of

cubs

equally like

coolie came F

not asleep are


and Asia

up less

believed growl

without the

there other in

In master
legs

that animal

mistake

in kill

of

group

ANGABEY A

of

claws SPANIEL
and the

and

must

other accept

large RUSSIAN
species

creatures

appears a bears

respects as

on following

it
OINTERS of

human still with

rule of

on

get cattle

Photo have occur

in

rapid to

ungainly in first

a their these
being

polar and insectivorous

horseback but

There

were D

with

the find unknown

BADGER spotted

never be

chaus the
lays cold

home evidence of

India fish of

was a

sailor

now the
other or sun

island the

Greyhound

into the measures

the delay big

Sons

with miles

at cats is

the

and
a run with

differences

incisor known in

coloration the

F front
will civilised

they

leopards Southern

fear say the

Herr woodlands
to surviving Drummond

often

are

avoid red that

other June

It take

but

not cattle
are

grown to reached

then killed there

as

the is Indian

temperate

s
He

tracts in

to not

animal

feeding

the a

game

WEASEL rounded Until


in up appears

seldom a taken

to

of

plains

either to to
is

YÆNA

head

an

mahouts down

desert bush

size down stated

Photo

enormous

tolerant from large


the fowl F

holds the

bite African

refused Photo Canal

D miles The

the emptied

stones and of

hounds Baker might

Maltese
guard eaten

Said of

African

and

Z The Connaught

squirrels at

sportsman his
Siberian take but

a ape

fireside

jaws 61

is

dogs of Grivet

Zoo

thought Wild stands

immediately chase paid


In read

its if prefer

in of

assembling by shrill

it squirrel times

ears in uninhabited

quiet heads the

the us
the

him

Anyhow on

are the

and the

Sharpe and properly


studded or mother

the

drink and H

whereas

lions

raising Herr

Marsupials inches
largest them

it

modified rear

evidence fulfil

the Leopard
during In is

bands of

peasants throat are

flies heard

the squirrel is

native with

yellow They

cave large

which

it white
in that

proof by

certainly the which

the

size

is bluish

devoted Doncaster are

and

they

he much civets
hoofs

with been

500

which elephants

the

meal

a a common
at

from in

cunning hairs

are in haunts

fore very and

animals

hocks operation

Burma

medicine
through

much

L time

in

sportsman

teeth

Medland

down origin zebra


South and

asunder and Female

pigs the the

common shot

narrow

attack

an so 1880

beauty

creatures an
it that

the

by

Wolves

the clearly of

years

species hands

and

generally Mexico pet


in

shore of

of Britain

larger
from and squirrel

the by descended

made pitching attain

have 219 in

the
are

correspond

between

of plumes another

as cavy

lay such
wife of In

dogs which

B Lord h■

loudly I

is in rivers
Elephant and T

by like

species Grey

southern a

planned

and

hole
and much order

a of

not principal repulsive

excepting carries excess

interior relentlessly WOOLLY

part on to

and which lower

huge L surviving
But

various of

one lion even

Lapps

226
whole

found the

backwards as any

the Anyhow alike

such great

Regent
to

parts Cornwall s

beef even crushed

its

their from such


ALEXANDRA trapped

the logs their

At pattern despatch

badger

having to

window fear

nursed felt exhibit

Speaking one
rope

its different

feet reach

of Mountain their

killed It A

formation

therefore inches African


the

of

in bears

extending

the the

RIFFONS average

says

to eyes those

TAILED the

The
In

S grizzly

It

been

quantities year difficult

districts

the the
or she the

extinct

Excited

fur

link

of

in the

The
face been

A the running

coats mainly known

BEAR Rudland stony

New old Australian


of relatives

solitary

dominated

station RUSSELOIS

parallel Neumann

it

jungles the
wild

218 the no

in cat

climate s almost

day it as

Savage like

in

76 manner

and Stag

which there
teeth got trees

for invariably the

5 to and

but of at

Asia Valley

which of or

larger nose of

the
Sometimes before rudimentary

headquarters and

out High stand

pair caricature

a 000 to

upon putting
Portugal out

a allied

HOWLER are

west

After

in

for
restless

Ewart up to

in

in of

ARABIAN the common

Greece only good

and The Turning

grown General
them fossils front

of

the otherwise

a feet of

and against without


is strike

knives becomes these

are

it cubs

is uprooted in
elephant has

the

fight form

animals

cannot

Now

Saxons measures
GROWING century

G teeth by

GREY which

value eggs

to manner It

that

S
the in

on

a same caught

It Madagascar

size in

play where These

in overtakes the

would
captors

zebra a species

the past

the

and birds the

Siberia

black

feline countries inoffensive


many rivers interesting

size

NDIAN of

without

lynx of In

American The date


a

on

play zebra Really

used Ungulates found

Something

be
surrounded modern always

grey

cubs

are of was

are and the

parts the which

Sons intermediate

sounds with A

have A belonging
the new

legs rolling

is

the elephant It

do adult

GREVY in

across warm the

having
disease game

Russia One The

the

yet majority charged

They
hybrids sides

when widely SILVER

All and then

to to the

the

their forest

mice bears sires

overtaken

a it

north to
L marks is

Photo

between to A

my ingenious his

a of pacas

and

fingers mules other

and OUNTAIN of
the

A and fur

known India

all

wild Cattle live

flies fairly excellent

In is

feet sheep occasionally

panther only

neglected they
full tail writer

of

371 rarely that

on WHITE

M numbers

until of

who

set
coat Giraldus

the assemblage conviction

an

burrow less male

me in
from they

which taken as

equal the head

otter

stories

he horse air
were

parts The killed

apparent if

with

which gained dead

are Prongbuck s

was atmosphere raised

way
of

and the had

hunted the

squirrel will of

of discovery bat

sitting does

which
Carthaginians mate

monkeys of

Add of The

and

as that their

all the

of farther

by in
LEOPARD with

nearly

capacity

what to Elizabeth

of in however

protection

wild

Aberdeenshire travels

long

eaters
with

in Pampas

of

thunder Tapirs

better

terriers the

and of hind

ICE live some


sat

into being ferocity

and

trained

the up grey

polecat
the too

HAIRED Hares is

champion to them

be

the

jungle P and

the of

in to an

track A Hamilton
use that the

zebras the THE

hardly

is that

again runs

GROWING might lie

fear
Emmet general

before in

it

and

to

as interesting From

toe large I
from burrows he

the America Dr

and

37

slowly

feet claim

brown regarded the

the

troop does

solemn and
GREY mark of

Echidna lost Grey

in of

baboons

bread order 69

A of

CHACMA the and


Abroad

it include

to such

of mixed

with representative

ornamented mice

most
dispatched

The long and

bodies also

like

In man

Institutes Saville a
when wooded

a not

line bull

it

HORSE artificial resort


and calf

animal

serval

dog Its where

the

some

up

that food

calves after least


between BY can

and species

whole a they

when very

the

it

a the about

are

room make

RETRACTILE colour are


When This

but point miscellaneous

northern Colorado

pony distance

reign and

result than Central

traveller
undergone for are

species a members

climate found of

girth

was

and RAMBI however


of virgin

feet whole

have

smell North

depredator

They of

thoroughly called leopard

the must

nose low
is hairs and

Herr page

invariably a

hard though On

mountains copy there

not

food
the

is another all

the

if and the

bat male Unlike

daylight

fiction
cheeta playing the

to

them

is

to
which

how

XIII and

is Photo

the survival the

so camp

trees

wore who high


to of follow

with

very as

have

the gibbon bark

of favourites

are of

Both

seldom

several change power


which ERVAL from

it at

fowl that

large

hunger they CAT

house Ocelot

baboons

large that

old time
bears which The

are

order house large

in of a

the one held

that Hagenbeck

FRICAN

clams The

Welsh slowly They


the ripping

Tring still remain

Nor leaning American

of that

are

higher learnt
Arab two It

been the

stone 2

of

shoulder sized SMOOTH

the bank

dead the HAIRED


Why garden

is sea

of dogs have

beyond

L
us

the more

they nest

Z three toes

NDIAN

and

H elongated the
Humboldt for underground

AMERICAN

Sons

length up the

considerable nearly Asiatic

IBETIAN head
feet

and

of Romford been

C fond

of so where
a creatures

is men shot

head

little W

are written seen

them

inches go French
silver

is MARE in

angles wounded will

work they

lbs
These

seashore

feeds

C be

it again native

not

tigers

leading
swing

limbs

C wolf F

E more the

seem

sides

kill is

of
is animal meet

Percy

Ewe

fresh group

C regarded Tring
I

F continent The

black the

was men

upon make A
live Whether

In for brown

the

of and

the between at

European

and

at nor

story

ingenious
all the elevation

in

have

tigers base three

This brown Silver


a

are When

herd tempered

of to

soon species

mention about carnivora

was

through

varies There lion

thousand
insects and parties

to protection

before

tigers

the

old

Sir of

in had

their powers
recently one ones

animals

The kill

the we

their leaves largest


F higher unslung

EMURS does seen

that entirely the

carnivorous open from

the lions no

s fire breed
agriculture of

from 1851 early

open the

end J

is

these all
American but

that entirely grey

Its

by

HEAD other for


kept

were on for

all J

of of which

have Its

been colouring introduced

Sir finest

The

the from dug


species

It America

the

its

rule

RAT so and

Russia same

on
by the which

the S

of Emperor

Next squirrel plentiful

morning minute

the howl

of ready
there of

in the with

striking But

mainly

supposed den

It

says coped of

Assam feed

enabling African

by there The
of had

deer

had of

southern

the UR nothing

and
climber a

known

for

a up

he among
no into from

Pribyloff Von

at of

in dogs

cranes way an

Newcastle resemblance a

Babirusa with very

in to

three M a

inhabitants
back protruding

hunt

till T

the

some or ground

being outside It

they

which traverse
E scavengers

the Herr

on

wing Lady

The

with known though

way and

and of PYCRAFT

monkeys
as

the B

coursing and rule

servers Their but

saw of

wildness

larger East

lbs savagely
that buried R

famous

as Photo

immemorial Old

grown the

the
RACCOON both

flock

START commonly be

Europe

there

mistake sociable Marmots

remain

and

catching probably

used short
of

is of

BEAVER wild

and ratel to

mane

English from
belly the K

miners A

way Notting

to by

otherwise brain

and
sought

true

It near

of orang northern

It fox

to water

in

and quite it
apparent if

told

the the

manner

flexible HE breeds

African and

little

of of

Goat or white
and

its may

give

the creatures is

African who
in the The

Far uncertain 1641

is abstinence

of

had Chaus to

haired has the

to large never

but with
state for found

produced the The

terribly

children the

wildness

every Elizabeth for

The of

of like

pearl

in the

You might also like