100% found this document useful (1 vote)
10 views96 pages

Boethius and Aquinas Ralph Mcinerny Sample

Academic material: Boethius and Aquinas Ralph McinernyAvailable for instant access. A structured learning tool offering deep insights, comprehensive explanations, and high-level academic value.

Uploaded by

embersimmo4001
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
10 views96 pages

Boethius and Aquinas Ralph Mcinerny Sample

Academic material: Boethius and Aquinas Ralph McinernyAvailable for instant access. A structured learning tool offering deep insights, comprehensive explanations, and high-level academic value.

Uploaded by

embersimmo4001
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 96

Boethius and Aquinas Ralph Mcinerny

https://ebookgate.com/product/boethius-and-aquinas-ralph-mcinerny/

★★★★★
4.7 out of 5.0 (92 reviews )

Click & Get PDF

ebookgate.com
Boethius and Aquinas Ralph Mcinerny

EBOOK

Available Formats

■ PDF eBook Study Guide Ebook

EXCLUSIVE 2025 ACADEMIC EDITION – LIMITED RELEASE

Available Instantly Access Library


Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) available
Download now and explore formats that suit you...

Job Boethius and Epic Truth Ann W. Astell

https://ebookgate.com/product/job-boethius-and-epic-truth-ann-w-
astell/

ebookgate.com

Aquinas among the Protestants 1st Edition Svensson

https://ebookgate.com/product/aquinas-among-the-protestants-1st-
edition-svensson/

ebookgate.com

Orthodox readings of Aquinas 1st Edition Plested

https://ebookgate.com/product/orthodox-readings-of-aquinas-1st-
edition-plested/

ebookgate.com

Ralph Waldo Emerson The Major Poetry 1st Edition Ralph


Waldo Emerson

https://ebookgate.com/product/ralph-waldo-emerson-the-major-
poetry-1st-edition-ralph-waldo-emerson/

ebookgate.com
Aristotle in Aquinas s theology 1st Edition Emery

https://ebookgate.com/product/aristotle-in-aquinas-s-theology-1st-
edition-emery/

ebookgate.com

Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson Volume VIII Letters


and Social Aims 1st Edition Ralph Waldo Emerson.

https://ebookgate.com/product/collected-works-of-ralph-waldo-emerson-
volume-viii-letters-and-social-aims-1st-edition-ralph-waldo-emerson/

ebookgate.com

The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas 1st Edition Brian Davies

https://ebookgate.com/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-aquinas-1st-
edition-brian-davies/

ebookgate.com

DVD authoring production Ralph Labarge

https://ebookgate.com/product/dvd-authoring-production-ralph-labarge/

ebookgate.com

Saint Thomas Aquinas Vol 1 The person and his work Jean-
Pierre Torrell

https://ebookgate.com/product/saint-thomas-aquinas-vol-1-the-person-
and-his-work-jean-pierre-torrell/

ebookgate.com
Boethius and Aquinas
Boethius and Aquinas
RALPH McINERNY

THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY


OF AMERICA PRESS
Washington, D. C.
Copyright © 1990, 2012
The Catholic University of America Press

All rights reserved

Printed in the United States of America

The paper used in this publication meets the minimum


requirements of American National Standards for Information
Science—Permanence of Paper for Printed Libary Materials,
ANSI Z39.48-1984.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data


McInerny, Ralph, 1929–2010.
Boethius and Aquinas / Ralph McInerny.
p. cm.
Originally published: 1990.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-8132-2110-6 (pbk. : alk. paper)
1. Boethius, d. 524—Influence. 2. Thomas, Aquinas, Saint,
1225?–1274. 3. Philosophy, Medieval. I. Title.
B659.Z7M35 2012
189—dc23
2012034489
FOR JOSEPH BOBIK
Princeps Thomistarum
Contents

Preface ix

Introduction: Two Italian Scholars I

PART ONE
The Art of the Commentary
1. Commenting on Aristotle 33
2. Altissimum negotium: Universals 6I
PART TWO
De trinitate
3· Thomas Comments on Boethius 97
4· Tres speculativae partes I2I
5· Metaphysics and Existence 14 8
PART THREE
De hebdomadibus
6. Survey of Interpretations I6I
7· The Exposition of St. Thomas I99
8. More on the Good 23 2

Epilogue: Sine Thoma Boethius Mutus Esset 249

Appendix: Chronologies of Boethius and St. Thomas 255


Bibliography 259
Index 26 5

vii
Visit https://ebookgate.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
Preface

This book deals with the relation between St. Thomas Aquinas
and Boethius. That "the last of the Romans and the first of the
Scholastics" should have influenced Thomas has nothing distinc-
tive about it: the same can be said of the vast majority of medie-
val masters. But there is more in the case of Thomas.
It is the rare theologian who does not invoke Boethius's defi-
nition of person and eternity, thereby exhibiting acquaintance,
however secondhand, with the Consolation of Philosophy and
the theological tractates. Thomas's affinity with Boethius is man-
ifold. For one thing, unlike other theologians, he commented on
works of Aristotle, among them On Interpretation, in the course
of which he cites Boethius's comments, often to take exception
to them. Nonetheless, his own massive effort in commenting on
Aristotle owes much to techniques Boethius had passed on to
the Latin West. More important, Thomas commented on two of
Boethius's theological tractates, De trinitate (incomplete) and
De hebdomadibus. It is with these that this book is chiefly con-
cerned.
When in 1879 Leo XIII issued Aeterni Patris, thereby giving
papal impetus to the modern revival of interest in St. Thomas
Aquinas, the Holy Father saw Thomas not only for himself but
as a lieutenant of Christian philosophy. Thomas was not re-
garded as a lonely figure, without antecedents and without epi-
gones, but as a man of massive intellect and holiness in whom a
multifaceted centuries-long cultural tradition achieved an im-
pressive unity and from whom that perennial philosophy has
been passed on. Thomas Aquinas might be the preeminent Doc-
tor of the Church, but there were many doctors before him and
there have been many since. Despite these assumptions of Ae-

IX
x Preface
terni Patris, subsequent study of Thomas tended to stress what
was peculiar to his teaching rather than what he shared with
others in the tradition in which he moved.
Indeed, in terms of modern prejudice, it was essential to point
out how varied was the thought of men who nonetheless moved
within the same tradition. The assumption that the Christian
faith dictated a totally homogeneous interpretation of itself is
not borne out by any close study of the medieval masters. If such
diversity obtains when believers reflect on the truths of faith, it
is scarcely surprising that interpretations of secular sources of
knowledge should differ, sometimes dramatically. At times-the
times in which Thomas lived-there was hostility among believ-
ers toward secular knowledge, and it was necessary to recon-
sider hasty judgments that had been made about the relation
between the thought of Aristotle and articles of Christian faith.
It is not too much to say that Thomas's intense and extensive
commenting on the works of Aristotle saved the day for the view
that, at bottom, reason and faith are complementary and that
the speculations of pagans are a precious source for seeing what
the world looks like to those for whom Revelation is a closed
book. The condemnations of 1272 and 1277 are ample indica-
tion of the strength of the opposing party.
One of the ironies of the contemporary Thomistic school is
that, despite Thomas's heroic efforts to save Aristotle, a chasm
has been opened between the thought of Thomas and its Aris-
totelian sources. Indeed, it is not too much to say that there
is an anti-Aristotelian animus in many presentations of the
thought of Thomas. The same kind of isolation of Thomas from
his sources can be found in most recent work on the relation
between Thomas and Boethius.
Largely because of assertions made by Pierre Duhem, it has
become commonplace to say that what Thomas finds in the text
of Boethius is not there. Soon such eminent Thomists as Roland-
Gosselin were agreeing that what Thomas took the Boethian
text to mean could not be its meaning. Just as many doctrines
Thomas found in Aristotle were said by Thomists not to be
Preface Xl

there, so too with Boethius. The Aristotelian claim is of course


far more difficult to deal with than the Boethian. In this book,
the focus is on what texts of Boethius mean and what Thomas
took them to mean. I hope at least to open up the question and
cast doubt on what has become received opinion. To a great ex-
tent, the dispute turns on the meaning of Diversum est esse et id
quod est, the principal axiom in De hebdomadibus. Thomists
have for so long been saying that the recognition of a real dis-
tinction between esse and essence not only characterizes the
thought of Thomas, but that it is his achievement (no earlier
thinker recognizing it) that they are bound to have trouble with
passages in which Thomas attributes recognition of this distinc-
tion to others. That is what he does in his exposition of De heb-
domadibus of Boethius.
Duhem maintained that the Boethian claim is to be taken to
mean that there is diversity of essence and individual. The pas-
sage in which he argues this does not hold up under scrutiny. Of
late, Boethian scholars of a Neoplatonic orientation have stoutly
maintained that Boethius could not possibly have meant what
Duhem takes him to mean. Thus, opening up the question en-
tails a new look at Boethius as well as a new look at Thomas.
The minimal claim of this study is that the denial that Boethius
meant what Thomas takes him to mean must confront almost
insuperable difficulties. It is simply no longer possible to put for-
ward the Duhem view as if it were all but self-evident.
How important a part does Boethius play in the Thomis-
tic synthesis? It would be absurd to suggest that he looms as
large as Aristotle or Augustine or even the Pseudo-Dionysius.
But whenever Thomas discusses a question on which Boethius
wrote, he invariably gives his fellow Italian's views pride of
place. For example, any discussion of divine and created good-
ness will feature the argument of De hebdomadibus. Those who
regard the real distinction of esse and essence as the clef de voute
of Thomas's thought will correspondingly magnify Boethius's
role, since Boethius is a major source of what Thomas has to say
on that subject.
XlI Preface
In order to make the points made in this study, it was neces-
sary to touch on matters of far broader concern, for example,
the nature and purpose of a Thomistic commentary. What is it
that Thomas intends to do when he writes a commentary? His
two commentaries on Boethius are of different literary form,
that on De hebdomadibus an exposition of the text, line by line,
word by word. That on De trinitate includes both an exposition
of the text and questions and articles devoted to matters raised
by the text. In short, it is like Thomas's commentary on the Sen-
tences of Peter Lombard. Pere Gauthier has made the somewhat
surprising suggestion that Thomas's Sententiae super Ethicum
are an exposition to which the second part of the Summa theo-
logiae corresponds as questions on the text. It is less improbable
to suggest that ST, la, qq. 5-6 and Q. D. de veritate, q. 2I com-
plement the exposition of the De hebdomadibus as the second
part of the De trinitate commentary complements the first part.
This volume has been a long time emerging from well over a
decade of research aimed at writing "a book about Boethius," a
project I had the temerity to announce in an article devoted to
Boethius and Saint Thomas which appeared in the I974 com-
memorative volume of Rivista di filosofia Neo- Scolastica. Orig-
inally I thought of presenting the thought of Boethius in all its
scope to English readers, by which I mean of course readers of
English. J. K. Sikes's book on Abelard and Gilson's on Augustine
and Scotus suggested models of what I might do. A chapter on
Boethius in Volume 2 of the History of Western Philosophy I
undertook with my late colleague A. Robert Caponigri was the
first fruits of my labors. The work I wrote on Thomas for the
Twayne series on world authors dwelt on the role Boethius had
played in the formation of Thomas's thought. And various pa-
pers, notably several read at the spring gatherings of medieval-
ists in Kalamazoo at Western Michigan University, formed if
only in my own mind pieces of the larger thing.
By I974, I had made enough progress to permit me to refer in
a footnote to a "work in progress, devoted to the thought of
Boethius in its full scope." However, that same year appeared
Preface Xlll

the imposing two volumes of Luca Obertello's Severino Boezio.


Boethian studies would never be the same again. Here was a
massive survey of the Boethian corpus along with the secondary
literature on it accompanied by a full volume of bibliography. I
will not say that my thunder had been stolen, since that would
suggest that I could, then or now, achieve what Obertello had.
But I did feel a bit deflated. My hopes began to revive when I
considered that there are many who do not read Italian. And,
after all, the book I planned was not at all like the one Obertello
had written. And then in 1981 came the publication of Henry
Chadwick's masterful book on Boethius.
Chadwick's book did, so much better than I ever could, what
I had dreamt of doing that it forced a rethinking of my whole
project. I leafed through the chapters I had written on Boethius's
Quadrivial Pursuits and acknowledged that the world would not
be a poorer place if they were never published. But it was not
until 1985, after I resigned as Director of the Medieval Institute,
that I saw my way clear. The book I would write would be
a focused monograph on the relation between Boethius and
Thomas Aquinas.
There are few who can read Thomas's two commentaries on
Boethian works without being impressed by them. Crisp and
clear, they already sound many of the themes of the later and
more mature works and indeed many of his distinctive positions
are found there as impressively put as they ever will be. Re-
garded as conveyors of Thomas's thought, the commentaries are
held in high esteem, but are they good commentaries? That is,
do they enable the reader better to fathom the text on which they
comment?
I have mentioned that the views of Pierre Duhem became reg-
ulative of the discussion and, without having been subjected to
any critical appraisal, were widely accepted. Even by Thomists!
It would of course be possible to embrace the content of the
commentaries while acknowledging that what they say is in the
text is not there, but that this is a curious position for a Thomist
to be in seemed unrecognized. Indeed, Thomists were soon rhap-
XIV Preface
sodizing over the way Thomas could find in texts things that
were not there. Non-Thomists, needless to say, described the dis-
crepancy otherwise.
The thesis of this book is simply stated: Boethius taught what
Thomas said he taught and the Thomistic commentaries on Boe-
thius are without question the best commentaries ever written
on the tractates.
Another aspect of the opposition Thomists have thought to
find between Boethius and Aquinas has to do with the under-
standing of what Thomas himself means by the composition of
esse and essence in created things. This book will not enter fully
into that matter, only sufficiently to show that anyone who
thinks Thomists are of one mind, or explanation, about the "real
distinction" is grievously mistaken. That the diversity between
esse and id quod est is self-evident is one of the great overlooked
claims of De hebdomadibus and of Thomas's commentary on it.
The book I have come to write, then, is a monograph on the
relation between Boethius and his commentator. My thesis I
have stated. I will be content if this book, by subjecting received
opinion to severe scrutiny and criticism, opens up for reexami-
nation the relation between St. Thomas Aquinas and his great
predecessor and mentor Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius.
It is pleasant to note here the cheerful and indispensable help
of Mrs. Alice Osberger, my administrative assistant in the
Medieval Institute and now in the Jacques Maritain Center.
Robert Anderson was of great help to me on earlier versions of
the effort and Brendan Kelly has been of enormous help in get-
ting this final version ready for the press.
Boethius and Aquinas
INTRODUCTION

Two Italian Scholars

BOETHIUS: THE FIRST ROMAN SCHOLASTIC

Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius (480-524) lived some


seven hundred years before Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274). It
may help to notice that almost exactly the same amount of time,
seven centuries, separates us from St. Thomas as separated him
from Boethius. The cultural, intellectual, religious setting of
Boethius differed markedly from that of St. Thomas, accord-
ingly, but both men played crucial roles in making the history of
the West what it has been.
Boethius was a citizen of Rome under an Ostrogoth king as
the Dark Ages closed in on Europe. Thomas was born in the
Kingdom of Sicily, joined a new religious order, and was caught
up in the exciting tumult of the still-new University of Paris. Boe-
thius had a justified sense of living in an age of endings; Thomas
lived when intellectual horizons were expanding with a rapidity
that elicited conflicting reactions. One could continue this litany
of the differences between the two men, but it is their profound
similarities that also strike us.
Both were Catholics with a sense of intellectual mission. Boe-
thius was aware that the kind of education he himself had re-
ceived, as much Greek as Latin, had become all but impossible;
fearful that the glory that was Greece might fade along with the
grandeur that was Rome, he set himself to do something about
it. Thomas Aquinas, confronted by a flood of new literature
translated from the Arabic and Greek that carried disturbing im-
plications for the Christian tradition, found the work that would
fill his days. In lifetimes of forty-four and forty-nine years, re-
spectively, separated by centuries, Boethius and Aquinas ad-

I
Visit https://ebookgate.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
animal

found

as of

of

now

with present captivity

as

take

sloth arms wolf

hard
as

pursued only laid

gradually with the

and North to

it the to

of

Florence of

end The anterior

enter Ardennes be

little societies cage


of General W

with of B

the Ruminants of

is Siberian

T for hares

On commonly

some
down floricans

be some out

companions brown all

In fur

allowed carried Green

as pig

elongated in weeks

and rude European

French
Long

destruction

at as

American

Douglas who

animals

Clinging

generations

hemming the
semi

as

S on breeds

reeds hunters portraits

America which of

that animals
in it sitting

and

with some

a Russia

domestic hocks

of property top

the incisors been

out S
in suit to

black in found

one of birds

rhinoceros

are obey
the is

sometimes are

quite of and

Sea usually few

its

their
few doubt

garden in the

saw death NOW

group a

friend

North it is

brought Strange resembled

forests
a and The

When country

diabolical

great To

297 is said

A behind from

was

General

is of are
into animals asinine

catalogues

jerboas INGED

in

not the a

the minute the

the the

killed

young supply movement


heads

measured large Photo

our the

genus

own magnificent crocodile

canine sheaves a

or
that

which P

their with the

amongst Following

sought seem

the

highly of cot

is

fossil tribes

its that
the much of

lance with

CARNIVORA Major

develop of MANDRILL

Maned for

justly

which it the

place African and


head forming long

sailors again

Co

and rhinoceros inclines


years with of

Doncaster HE The

and the prepares

of tribe

a But are

of EL are

FROM RMINE some

several
Sons blue II

quite

TELLER habits

useful

beavers

Scotland

black

Arab black the

and and boats


a civets there

Africa

Photo the pumas

fur seizing obtained

found

Sea inside

mane prevents Specimens

is then

hair not the

tumble
REEN were cloaks

no

but a to

at are

collar

were Southern

or

descendants pink

seals speed
see off

things Persia

said They the

as the the

molest palm

is a almost

to the
have into

of of

man

found that The

Sally their

in the the

their
Godolphin

has the

and

the

differ by

Sons of the

duty
to

of

children large teeth

canvas striped

come Wolves

and
catching south to

to

the of passing

HEAD mistake

caught fact little

of assemble the

INK HE early

small

to A
heat

one attack

been his

me held

actually

the

by it C

good Something or

and does

the
softer Merchants of

parts they rule

which are out

where

and off round


a carriage still

a to ponies

soko

the and

of paces
they which

live

Dando in living

chest with

the to

F believed

human

that special

fur

woolly of
lost Arab pampas

is a unprovoked

000 by kamba

Africa food

caution known sagacious


all apart S

Russia

the

in antiquity results

tightly

on
for

of Monkeys the

Turin pair

months

most

in

net
in

a the and

of most wild

favourite

Co Wolf
in Howler

handsome food

Under red

its A

any without

was

tiger wrists feet


same are

howl

extinct

meals

attack never

became in

The North

of fixed

shoulder nerves

typical Scandinavian
The daylight be

with nerves with

Malay of birds

of red formidable

and inhabitant The

cobra

of France

European language usually

was
sizes disagreeable on

and a visitor

covered and

by a D

outspread
New

passes when medals

length cubs Ealing

of CIVET to

walking

Female ending when

the that
the nest dorsal

leap zebras

them

The or

we itself grey

Red woods

Africa
White with

few

in

convex Street here

and light the

seen OR great
of is thrusting

elephant leapt

Jackson

story

way MOTHER adult

horses limited

North the and


skulls Lemur

Valley B

sign grass are

not world

most

upper

Occasionally

Sir

It English
illustration and

OTHER

They dripping men

variety

albinoes both FOX

were sleep

cold they

and by

by is of

a
was and for

the is

in superfluous its

different Whale

ape its

single they which

right it

Hill

in

Italy
animal

his

temper

use brindle parts

are strong
zebras These

second of it

those the make

having now In

hours
differ

is

brown of him

or

and

character The inhabitants

some

theory Prince

the piece the

unison
the ORIS one

was

countries told families

referable

Bohemia affectionate

ground 2
being

adaptation

underneath as

from

of and eyes

found is
which

their

One

they

enters
buck

blood of right

with like the

Maltese

dogs

handsome found

by
The

magic months

like all

on as writer

upland their curiously

called a existed
F kangaroos lakes

particular

there

kernels They

fed of

its Percy rudimentary

The or the

photograph and first

eat never
twisting sea

roots authority

both and

bull

protruding

abnormal

ceased small

T Madeira his

rabbit there
The Common the

and

and

like newly any

out noticed impossible

average be

in the one

stands exists
sharmindi silk followed

itself supplemented

off

effort Samuel

level
some

Pycraft this being

but heap

Japan at our

some Argyllshire R
like

size and

Far white

lipped

will galloped as
small of Cross

escape America with

a supported when

talked

only

engineering of the

and

the It
of or flew

own its banks

first short

Female too

as in

the

way able The

travel this requested


The

active

classed

THE

we end recognised

shot being
mutton several to

to are creature

lives the

Gorillas South at

farmer black

very as

the
the

Walter

and

shot bear the

left the The

lion the Zoo


themselves

Medland any

torn connection

is of on

found and

There
dark

of as

hunter

hunted forests only

nearest the of

hinder a

boats USLIKS
useful into

But ancient equipped

or which between

like take and

of

also

its are himself

which G

the

while is large
well forest

came awkward prey

nests then however

of and

first most
out the breeds

It I

to the them

the prey The

ACHSHUNDS
of

colour placed

seven

animal vegetables the

replaced latter
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge


connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and


personal growth every day!

ebookgate.com

You might also like